Oakland to San Jose Phase 2A Planning Studies, Environmental Documentation, and Final Design RFSOQ Pre-Submittal Meeting

Transcription

1 Oakland to San Jose Phase 2A Planning Studies, Environmental Documentation, and Final Design RFSOQ Pre-Submittal Meeting October 16, 2018 Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA)

2 Agenda RFSOQ Overview Key Project Elements CCJPA DBE Program RFSOQ Dates and Process Evaluation Criteria Q&A

3 RFSOQ Overview Complete pre-construction planning, environmental, and engineering design for Oakland to San Jose Phase 2A Service Expansion Project Budget: $5 million initially, but will expand as scope is developed with more details Schedule: 6 years Work Directive-based Primary Project goals Reduce travel time for passenger rail services between Oakland and Newark Increase overall railroad capacity between Oakland and Newark Reduce freight and passenger rail conflicts Provide better opportunities for intermodal connections between Peninsula and East Bay

4 Key Project Elements

5 Key Project Elements Industrial Parkway Vital for optimizing freight rail movements DRAFT Conceptual Alternative

6 Option A DRAFT Conceptual Alternative Option B DRAFT Conceptual Alternative Niles Junction/Shinn connection Vital for optimizing freight rail movements Consolidation of rail lines can open rail locked parcels to land use changes Option C DRAFT Conceptual Alternative

7 Key Project Elements Proposed intermodal (rail + bus) station at intersection of Coast Subdivision and SR 84, in the Ardenwood Fremont/Newark area: Two-level station (passenger rail on bottom and bus/highway on top) Median busway facility connecting with SR 84 Parking structure Key stakeholders: Caltrans AC Transit Private shuttle providers Cities of Fremont and Newark

8 Key Project Elements RTC modeling (UPRR led) to scope rail network capacity Ridership modeling Passenger rail AC Transit Private shuttle providers Environmental documentation analyses Some creek crossings Noise impacts Freight rail impacts Public outreach Local communities Public agencies

9 CCJPA DBE Program CCJPA/BART DBE Policy The CCJPA, through BART, its managing agency, is committed to carrying out the all of the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Requirements of 49 CFR Part 26, as amended Ensure non-discrimination Create a level playing field

10 CCJPA DBE Program DBE Goal: NO Goal DBE Program Still Applies * BART Office of Civil Rights will be monitoring the overall Agreement for DBE participation per your DBE commitment goal, if any * DBE primes, including DBE JV partners, will not count towards the DBE commitment * Monthly DBE reports will be due, if DBEs listed * Substitutions of DBEs will require replacement with DBEs or good faith efforts * DBEs, as listed on Exhibit 1, must perform a commercially useful function * DBEs will be counted only for the work for which they are certified

11 CCJPA DBE Program Certifications: DBEs must be certified prior to the proposal submission date DBEs must be certified by the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP)

12 RFSOQ Dates and Process SOQ Submission Nov 30 Notification for Oral Interviews Dec 14 Oral Interviews Jan 11 All questions about the RFSOQ received at this meeting and over will be recorded and the answers will be made available online at

13 Evaluation Criteria Project Team Qualifications 25% Experience of the Firms 25% Qualifications and relevant experience of the Key Personnel relative to the Scope of Services. Overall strength and approach of the Project Team, including any previous working relationships among the team members. Project Team s approach and understanding of the project should be included in SOQ, including a draft project schedule. Demonstrated experience and capability of the firms on similar environmental documentation and railroad engineering design projects for Class I freight/passenger rail operators, including projects performed directly for UPRR following their design standards. Experience in intermodal transit center design and planning, including busways and park-and-ride facilities should also be demonstrated. Oral Presentation 50% Qualifications and experience of the Project Team. Proposer s approach to the Project and demonstrated technical knowledge of Project requirements.

14 Q & A