TRANSPARENCY IN STRATEGIC PROJECTS DIVISION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TRANSPARENCY IN STRATEGIC PROJECTS DIVISION"

Transcription

1 TRANSPARENCY IN STRATEGIC PROJECTS DIVISION Scott Spradlin, P.E. Strategic Projects Division, TxDOT Footer Text October 13, 2015 Date

2 INNOVATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY

3 INNOVATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY AUTHORITY AND LIMITATIONS TxDOT Traditional Project Delivery TxDOT Districts Innovative Project Delivery TxDOT s large complex projects Design-Bid-Build Transportation Code 223 Subchapter A and B Design-Build Transportation Code 223 Subchapter F Comprehensive Development Agreement (CDA) Transportation Code 223 Subchapter E & Section 371 CDA Design-Build CDA Concessions 3

4 TXDOT P3 PROGRAM OVERVIEW PRE-PROCUREMENT** $ 5.8 Billion 5 Projects PROCUREMENT $ 2.4 Billion 3 Projects DESIGN - CONSTRUCTION $ 8.4 Billion 12 Projects OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE $ 9 Billion* 5 Projects Transportation Alternative Delivery Program Total = $25.6 Billion* **Delivery Method Not Determined * Includes SH-130 Seg. 1-4, $1.3 B 4

5 TRANSPARENCY

6 DOING BUSINESS WITH TXDOT STRATEGIC PROJECTS DIVISION Firms can do business with TxDOT SPD through: Professional Services Contracts (Qualification Based-Competitively Selected) General Engineering Consulting Contracts (GEC) Procurement Engineering Contracts (PcE) Independent Engineering Contracts (IE) Program Management Contracts (Primarily ROW Services) (PMC) Teamed with A Private Firm/Developer/Contractor (Selected by the Private Entity) On a Design Build Team On a Comprehensive Development Team Economically disadvantage and small business programs overseen by Office of Civil Rights Disadvantage Business Enterprise (DBE) Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUB) Small Business Enterprise (SBE) 6

7 PROCUREMENT DELIVERY PROCESS SUMMARY Project agreements entered into a thorough competitive procurement process defined in statute and code 3-4 months 6-9 months 4-6 months Evaluate project needs and assessment Procurement qualification and shortlist (RFQ) Procurement proposal development and evaluation (RFP) Conditional award, recommendation, selection and notification Contract negotiation and execution Commission Action Agreements* Commission Action RFQ Approval Commission Action RFP Approval Commission Action Award *Agreements requiring transfer of funds, ROW, PDAs, AFA 7

8 TYPICAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Additional Contract and Financial Overview 1420 Committee Legislative Budget Board Attorney General Commission Executive Director Project Steering Committee Commission Actions: Announces conditional award Authorizes TxDOT to initiate negotiations; issue NTP ESRC Committee FHWA Oversight RFP Advisory Subcommittees Pass / Fail / Responsiveness Qualifications and References Technical Selection Advisory Facilitators / Observers Conditional award, recommendation, selection and notification 8

9 TXDOT CDA PROCUREMENT PROCESS RFP Best-Value Selection Process Best Value = Price and Other Factors that impact the project Based on Best Value, not necessarily lowest bid Established evaluation procedure Selection Criteria Cost of project Quality of project Quality 10% 20% Typical Best Value Weighting Schedule 10% 15% Cost of Project 70% 80% Schedule Conditional award, recommendation, selection and notification 9

10 TXDOT RISK ALLOCATION Delivery Methods: Risk Allocation Assignments 1 Risk Type Environmental Approval Traffic & Revenue Financing Operation & Maintenance Environmental Compliance ROW Acquisition 2 Utility Delays Design Construction Schedule Delays Project Delivery Method / CDA Business Model Design-Build Concession Owner Shared Developer 1 Actual risk assignments may vary by project 2 Eminent Domain delays retained by the owner 10

11 ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY CONCEPTS (ATC) Allows for contractor/developer innovation resulting in cost savings 12projects to date delivered over $425 Million in savings and 88 ATCs implemented To be acceptable, the ATCs must result in: Performance and quality equal to or better than original design; and/or DFW Connector: SH 114/SH 121 split Potential cost savings TxDOT has sole discretion in the performance and quality determination DFW Connector 11

12 COMMITTEES & TASK FORCE ATC Evaluation Committee Alternative Delivery Joint Committee TxDOT-AGC Joint Liaison Committee TxDOT-AGC Safety Measurement & Reporting Task Force DB Training Task Force District Partnering House Select Committee on Transportation Planning Small DB Specifications Task Force Contracts, Terms & Conditions and Procurement Task Force 12

13 PROJECT SHEETS / FUNDING SHEET REPORTS Publicly available project information: Project Description Major equity members Capital Costs Funding Sources Project schedule Compliance with Texas Administrative Code reporting requirements for Major projects 13

14 TXDOT ONLINE Overview of Public Documents RFQ and RFP Documents TxDOT website Agreements Awarded project list, Developers, Team List and Scorings Transportation Commission Meetings & Presentations Minute Orders 14

15 QUESTIONS Scott Spradlin, P.E. Procurement Project Manager Strategic Projects Division Texas Department of Transportation TxDOT website 15