The race to reinvent the process for developing connected and autonomous vehicles. CSD&M2018 Paris Stephane GUIGNARD,

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "The race to reinvent the process for developing connected and autonomous vehicles. CSD&M2018 Paris Stephane GUIGNARD,"

Transcription

1 The race to reinvent the process for developing connected and autonomous vehicles CSD&M2018 Paris Stephane GUIGNARD,

2 Agenda Aras at a Glance Automotive Industry Context Digital Tools & Processes Challenges Aras Approach Conclusion 2

3 Aras at a glance

4 Aras Company Overview Enterprise Product Lifecycle Management Fastest growing worldwide 46% Global Operations Veteran PLM Team North America, Europe and Asia Focus on markets with complex products & processes Automotive & Industrial Aerospace & Defense High Tech Electronics Consumer Goods Life Sciences Energy 3 year compounded annual growth 450+ employees and hiring 300+ Subscribers Worldwide 1,000+ Companies running Aras Open 4

5 Sample Customers 5

6 Automotive Industry Context

7 Growing number of assistence features picture source: 7

8 From car manufatcurer. to part of an ecosystem 8

9 Maintaining In-Service Products Interpreting IoT data and managing updates in the field Over The Air Updates (OTA) OTA software updates will not only affect your infotainment system but also power train and vehicle safety systems 9

10 Coordinating Cross-Discipline Development 80% of product innovation and differentiation is now electrical, electronics and software. Not mechanics. - Siegmar Haasis, R&D, CIO, Daimler 10

11 Managing Outsourced Activities Now suppliers control critical technologies 11

12 Delivering sytems & services globally 12

13 Growing degree in digitalization of product Eco Systems Digital Product grows exponentially Autonomous driving Connected Car / IoT Connectivity Assisted Driving GAP Infotainment Automotive Digital Tools stay behind heute 13

14 Digital Tools & Processes Challenges

15 Main Challenges for Digital Tools and Processes 15

16 Aras Approach and Beliefs

17 No Single Product Definition Without a single, integral product definition managed by a single, integral product configuration, how do you enable MBSE? Multi-domain modeling and simulation? Product lines, options, variants? Configuration and change management? Verification and validation? Connected products / IoT? Digital thread? Digital twin? Digital transformation? Mechanical MCAD/ PLM Electrical ECAD Systems PLM, ALM, or Standalone Product Definition??? Electronic EDA Software ALM

18 Platform Overlay Approach Concept Development Manufacturing Service Platform Applications Platform Services MBSE Simulation ECAD PDM MCAD PDM ERP MES Maint. Mgt. Depots & Shipyards ALM

19 A Single Platform for Product Definition Common Applications Quality V&V Collaboration Common Services Permissions Role-based contexts & views Etc. Mechanical Systems & Requirements Systems Electrical Electronic V&V Collaboration Common Processes Config/Change Variants PLE Software Common Apps Common Svcs

20 Reconciling CM Models The optimal way to solve the challenge Create CM meta-models for each domain Reconcile differences in domain-specific CM models through the meta-models Mechanical Electrical Product Software Systems Electronic Product Lifecycle Domain Lifecycles

21 Adding ALM Capabilities to PLM Integrate or Replace? Functions Integrations Reqs Mgt Model Mgt Test Mgt SCM Modeling IDEs Code Analysis Agile Planning & Execution / Project Mgt Change Mgt & Defect Tracking Simulation Test Automation Unit Test Devops Services APIs Best Practice Configuration Management Services

22 Thank you for your attention 22