STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
|
|
- Gervais Edwards
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 ATTACHMENT 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DETERMINATION OF ADEQUACY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE OLMSTED WASTE-TO-ENERGY FACILITY: MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTOR UNIT 3 PROJECT ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FINDINGS OF FACT The Olmsted Waste-to-Energy Facility: (Project) came before the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for an adequacy decision on November 28, After affording all interested persons the opportunity to present written and oral data, statements to the MPCA, after reviewing the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), and considering all of the evidence in the records, files, and proceedings herein, the MPCA, being fully advised, hereby makes the following,, and Order. PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. The Olmsted County Public Works (OCPW) is proposing to expand the Olmsted Waste-to-Energy Facility (OWEF). The OWEF site is located on the east side of Rochester in Olmsted County (County). The facility is situated along the west side of Silver Creek Road and the south side of the Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad, approximately 0.4 miles north of College View Road East (County Road 9). 2. The OCPW is proposing to install one new municipal waste combustor (MWC) with a proposed capacity of 200 tons per day, doubling the capacity of the existing plant. The facility currently processes over 62,000 tons of municipal solid waste (MSW) annually, using two MWC s of 100 tons per day capacity each. The energy recovered from this process is used to provide steam, electricity, and chilled water service to a district energy system serving 26 buildings. The proposed MWC Unit 3 would also operate in a co-generation mode, simultaneously producing steam for district heating/cooling and electrical power. This arrangement maximizes the overall thermal efficiency of the waste-to-energy system. 3. The building housing the new unit will be constructed on the west side of the existing OWEF in a flat area that is covered with gravel and grass. The proposed cooling tower is to be constructed in a grassed area on the north side of the facility. The new condenser and cooling tower will be installed to serve as the related heat sink. 4. A new steam turbine generator is also proposed and it will have a five-mega-watt (gross) rating. Electrical power produced in excess of that required by directly connected loads will continue to be sold to the Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency. The steam turbine generator will be equipped with extraction ports at pressures correlating to the steam pressures in the existing plant and District Energy System so that it will be fully compatible with the existing plant. New balance of plant auxiliary equipment will be installed to serve the proposed MWC Unit 3, including new boiler feed pumps, new condensate pumps, and a new deaerating feed tank.
3 5. The proposed MWC Unit 3 will be equipped with a Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS) like the ones installed for MWC Units 1 and 2. Those systems are capable of monitoring carbon monoxide, inlet/outlet sulfur dioxide (SO2) concentrations, opacity, oxygen (used as a diluent measurement), steam flow, fabric filter inlet temperature, powdered activated carbon feed rate, and stack gas flow (for mass emission limits). The proposed MWC Unit 3 CEMS will include the addition of a nitrogen oxide monitor. The existing CEMS enclosure is of sufficient size to accommodate the additional equipment. 6. Building systems that will need to be expanded into the new area include lighting, heating, electrical power, service air, service water, communications, and fire protection. The amount of surface area disturbed during construction is expected to be less than 1.0 acre. 7. The existing ash system will be expanded to handle the ash produced by the proposed MWC Unit 3. Some modifications will be necessary, but the capacities of the existing system are sufficient to serve the proposed MWC Unit 3, so these modifications will be relatively minor. All OWEF ash is permanently disposed of in a permitted, dedicated ash cell(s) at the County-owned and operated Kalmar Landfill in Kalmar Township. The capacity of the Kalmar Landfill ash cells are sufficient to handle the additional ash generated by the proposed MWC Unit The following approvals and permits would be required for the proposed Project. a. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program Permit Amendment and Major Amendment to Part 70 Operating Permit b. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Water Appropriation Permit Amendment (Water Supply) c. Rochester-Olmsted Planning Department Site Development Plan Review d. City of Rochester Industrial Discharge Permit notification of significant increase in volume of wastewater discharges Building Permit and Zoning Certificate Grading Permit Structure Height Variance NEED FOR AN EIS 9. Minn. R , subp. 1, Threshold Test, and subp. 13, Solid Waste, require that an EIS be prepared for the construction or expansion of a mixed MSW energy recovery facility or incinerator with a capacity of 250 or more tons per day of input. Although the proposed Project will have a planned capacity of 200 tons per day and not meet or exceed the threshold of a mandatory EIS, the OCPW has voluntarily agreed to complete an EIS for the proposed Project. 10. In compliance with Minn. R , subp. 1, and , subp. 13, the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) for the EIS is the MPCA. 2
4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SCOPING PROCESS 11. A Draft Scoping Decision Document was prepared on the proposed Project and distributed to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) mailing list and other interested parties on June 30, A press release containing notice of the public meeting regarding the Draft Scoping Decision Document was provided to newspapers serving the Project area on June 30, A notice of the availability of the scoping document was published in the EQB Monitor on July 4, The scoping period began July 5, 2005, ran for 35 days, and ended on August 8, The MPCA also held a public meeting in, on July 27, Written comments regarding the Scoping Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) were received from the three local units of government: the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and the Minnesota State Historical Society. Two comment letters were also received from interested parties. Those comments were incorporated into the Final Scoping Decision Document. 14. A scoping decision was adopted by the MPCA Citizens Board on September 27, The Final Scoping Decision Document contained an anticipated EIS schedule, a listing of issues to be addressed in the EIS, and a description of alternatives to be addressed in the EIS. 15. The Final Scoping Decision Document identified a number of issues that required additional information and were examined in the EIS. They are identified below: a. The EIS contains a focused human health risk analysis of air toxic emissions from MWC Unit 3, including human health hazards and cancer risks from exposures to air, soils, and biota. b. The EIS includes an analysis of the mercury emissions and local deposition including the following: 1. Assessment of the air concentrations and deposition of mercury, in the vicinity of the facility, to waters of the state that are associated with MWC Unit 3 emissions. 2. Estimation of any increase in methylmercury concentrations in fish tissue associated with MWC Unit 3 emissions. 3. Calculation of the percent increase of mercury in fish tissue associated with MWC Unit 3 emissions as compared to estimates of existing concentrations. 16. The EQB rules, found at Minn. R. ch. 4410, require that an EIS evaluation address the no build alternative and at least one alternative from each of several alternative types, or provide a concise explanation of why an alternative from a particular alternative type is not evaluated. 17. The EIS assessed the consequences of a no build decision for the proposed Project using information compiled by the Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance (MOEA). The MOEA staff conducted an inventory of available solid waste management facilities that take MSW in Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota, and Iowa. 3
5 18. The inventory of available facilities was provided by the MPCA. The list of available facilities was limited to those facilities that are most likely to accept MSW diverted from the County if the OWEF were not available. 19. The issue of design alternatives was not discussed in the Scoping EAW because the design of the proposed expansion must meet specific design specifications that are required by both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the MPCA. Therefore, this alternative discussion was not carried forward to the EIS. 20. The issue of location alternatives was not discussed in the EIS as the proposed Project is an expansion of an existing facility. Also, relocation of the proposed Project is not likely to have significant environmental benefits. 21. The issue of alternative technologies was not discussed in the Scoping EAW because the design of the proposed expansion must meet specific design specifications that are required by both the EPA and the MPCA. Therefore, this alternative discussion was not carried forward to the EIS. 22. The modified size alternative section compared the following scenarios for consideration: a. Two 100-ton per day units. b. Four 50-ton per day units. c. Alternate size capacities (minimum/maximum) for the new waste-to-energy boiler. d. Alternate size capacities (minimum/maximum) for the new steam turbine-generator. 23. Economic and Social Impacts Assess the potential for the Project and the no-build alternative to directly and indirectly affect the local economic and sociological impacts; the facility s impact on cost to the user of the facility and general public was identified. The effect of the proposed facility on regional and county solid waste system costs and public economic risks was evaluated. Inventories were completed of any nearby existing and planned recreational resources. Any potential impacts resulting from the expansion were described. Historical and archeological resources do not appear to exist at or near the site, and there was no analysis of these issues in the EIS. DRAFT EIS 24. The Draft EIS was prepared in a manner consistent with EQB rules (Minn. R ) and in accordance with the scoping decision. The Draft EIS contained: a. A cover sheet identifying the RGU and a contact person there, the Project proposer and the proposer s contact person, the Project title, the Project location, the date of the public meeting on the Draft EIS, and the date for the end of the comment period and a one paragraph abstract of the EIS. b. A summary which stressed the major findings, areas of controversy, and issues to be resolved, including the choice among alternatives. 4
6 c. A table of contents. d. A list of preparers. e. A project description identifying the purpose of the Project, its size, scope, environmental setting, geographic location, and the anticipated phases of development. f. A list of all known governmental permits and approvals required by the Project. g. A discussion of the potentially significant impacts of the proposed Project and the environmental, economic, employment, and sociological impacts generated by the Project and a brief discussion of any major differences of opinion concerning significant impacts of the proposed Project on the environment. h. A discussion of the other reasonable alternatives that were considered and their potentially significant impacts or an explanation why an alternative of a particular type was not included. i. An identification of reasonable mitigation measures proposed to eliminate or minimize any adverse effects of the Project. 25. The Draft EIS was distributed to the mailing list contained in EQB Rules, to the Project proposer, the governmental units known to have permitting or approval authority over the Project, and to persons requesting the EIS. A notice of availability of the Draft EIS was published in the EQB Monitor on September 25, 2006, and a press release was also issued to newspapers in the area on September 25, The public notice and press release provided a brief description of the Project, information on the date, time, and location of the public meeting, the date on which the public comment period would end, and the locations at which copies of the Draft EIS were available for review. 27. A public meeting to receive comments on the Draft EIS was held on Tuesday, October 17, 2006, from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m., to discuss the Draft EIS for the Project. The hearing was held in the Olmsted County Government Center Board Room, 151 4th Street Southeast,. The meeting was attended by the Project proposer, two representatives from the League of Women Voters, the OCPW staff, and several County Commissioners. The meeting was recorded via court reporter and a transcript is available. 28. According to Minn. R , subp. 1, Contents, the Final EIS shall respond to timely substantive comments on the Draft EIS. One comment letter was received during the comment period from Chris Moates, District 6 Planning Director, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT), stating that the proposal appears to have no impacts on MNDOT roadways. Another comment was submitted, via , after the close of the comment period, from Marcia L. Brown of the Rochester League of Women Voters, in support of the proposed Project. As the comment letters do not convey substantive information concerning the adequacy of the EIS, and no other comments letters were received, a separate response to comments document was not prepared. 5
7 FINAL EIS 29. The MPCA staff prepared a Final EIS pursuant to the requirements in Minn. R The MPCA staff determined that the information in the Draft EIS had not changed. 30. Although Minn. R , subp. 2, describes the Final EIS as comprised of the Draft EIS, the written comments suggesting minor changes to the Draft EIS and responses to those comments, as noted in item 27, no substantive comments were received; therefore, the Draft EIS document that was mailed to interested parties on June 30, 2006, together with the following minor clarifying changes recommended by MPCA staff, comprise the Final EIS on the Project. The following revisions to the draft EIS should be noted: Cover Page: The word Combuster in the title should be changed to Combustor. Abstract: The word combuster should be changed to combustor , Risk Characterization: carcinogenic or noncarcinogenic should be changed to carcinogenic or potential for noncarcinogenic for consistency with other sections of the EIS. MDH/MPCA s cancer risk limit of 1x10-5 should be changed to MDH/MPCA s cancer risk level of 1x10-5 for consistency with other sections of the EIS. 31. A notice of availability of the Final EIS was published in the EQB Monitor on November 6, 2006, and a press release was issued to newspapers in the Rochester area on November 3, These notices indicated the locations at which copies of the Final EIS were available for review and the date on which the comment period on the Final EIS was to expire (November 21, 2006). 32. The MPCA distributed copies of the Final EIS on November 3, 2006, in a manner consistent with Minn. R , subp. 3. Copies were provided to all persons receiving copies of the Draft EIS, all parties who submitted comments on the Draft EIS, and all persons requesting copies of the Final EIS. DETERMINATION OF ADEQUACY AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 33. The MPCA, as RGU for the proposed Project, is the appropriate governmental unit for making a determination of adequacy pursuant to Minn. R The information presented in the Final EIS adequately addresses the issues identified in the Final Scoping Decision Document adopted September 27, The proposed action is described in sufficient detail. 36. The EIS adequately analyzes and addresses the potentially significant issues and alternatives raised in scoping. 6
8
TO INTERESTED PARTIES: RE: Chippewa Valley Ethanol Company Expansion
TO INTERESTED PARTIES: RE: The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has approved the,, and Order for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) on the proposed Project, Swift County. The Findings
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
p-ear2-80b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED REG ALBERT LEA, LLC PROJECT FREEBORN COUNTY
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED ELK RIVER LANDFILL INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE GENERATOR
More informationRE: Olmsted Waste-to-Energy Facility: MWC Unit 3 Project Environmental Impact Statement
July 4, 2005 TO: INTERESTED PARTIES RE: : MWC Unit 3 Project Environmental Impact Statement An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is being prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) on
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
p-ear2-44b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED RANDY S SANITATION TRANSFER FACILITY PROPOSED
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT. Project Description
p-ear2-46b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED SHAMROCK RECYCLING AND TRANSFER STATION
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
p-ear2-75b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED EAGLE BEND WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
More informationSOUTH ST. LOUIS SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT FINDINGS OF FACT
SOUTH ST. LOUIS SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RECORD OF DECISION In the Matter of the Determination of the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Sargent Creek Channel and Floodplain
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED ANDERSEN CORPORATION - PROJECT XL WASHINGTON COUNTY
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED FLINT HILLS RESOURCES, LP MARSHALL TANK FARM EXPANSION
More informationTO INTERESTED PARTIES: RE: Heartland Corn Products Ethanol Plant Expansion
TO INTERESTED PARTIES: RE: Heartland Corn Products Ethanol Plant Expansion The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has approved the Findings of Fact for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT. St. Francis Wastewater Treatment Facility Project Description
p-ear2-78b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED ST. FRANCIS WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ST. LOUIS
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
p-ear2-68b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED PIRKL GAS, INC. PROPANE STORAGE EXPANSION
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
p-bp15-01-02b ATTACHMENT 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED LESTER PRAIRIE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
p-ear2-20b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED LONG PRAIRIE MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
More informationMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Industrial Division
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Industrial Division APEC Ethanol Production Facility Request for Approval of Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order and Authorization to Issue a Negative Declaration
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED NEW FASHION PORK, ENGELKES SITE NOBLES COUNTY WORTHINGTON,
More informationTO INTERESTED PARTIES: RE: Al-Corn Clean Fuels Plant Expansion
TO INTERESTED PARTIES: RE: Al-Corn Clean Fuels Plant Expansion The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has approved the for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) on the proposed Al-Corn Clean
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED LONSDALE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION,
More informationAIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. ConAgra Flour Milling Company P.O. Box 3500 Omaha, NE For
AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 03700020-001 IS ISSUED TO ConAgra Flour Milling Company P.O. Box 3500 Omaha, NE 68103-0500 For CONAGRA FLOUR MILLING COMPANY - HASTINGS 2005 South Vermillion Street Hastings, Dakota
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT FACILITY HISTORY
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED HOWARD LAKE WASTEWATER TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED BRAUN HOG FEEDLOT EXPANSION PRAIRIEVILLE TOWNSHIP/BROWN
More informationFINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS
FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS I-694/ I-494/ I-94 Interchange Improvements State Project No. 8286-81 Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation July, 2018 CONTENTS STATEMENT OF ISSUE... 2 ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT. Project Description
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED STROBEL FARMS JUNGBLOET SITE & BUECKSLER SITE BLUE
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
p-ear2-59b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED HEARTLAND HUTTERIAN BRETHREN, INC. FEEDLOT
More informationMINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY RMAD and Industrial Divisions Environment & Energy Section; Air Quality Permits Section
001 p-bp15-01-02a 002 003 004 005 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY RMAD and Industrial Divisions Environment & Energy Section; Air Quality Permits Section The University of Minnesota Twin Cities Combined
More informationAIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. ConAgra Flour Milling Company P.O. Box 3500 Omaha, NE For
AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 03700020-002 IS ISSUED TO ConAgra Flour Milling Company P.O. Box 3500 Omaha, NE 68103-0500 For CONAGRA FLOUR MILLING COMPANY HASTINGS 2005 South Vermilion Street Hastings, Dakota
More informationPermitting and Environmental Review
Permitting and Environmental Review Senate Environment and Natural Resources Committee Jeff J. Smith MPCA Industrial Division Director Larry R. Kramka MnDNR Assistant Commissioner lppt-2bsy11 January 27,
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY In the Matter of the Decision on the Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Remer Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion FINDINGS
More informationContent Copy Of Original
Content Copy Of Original Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change Ministère de l Environnement et de l Action en matière de changement climatique Tractebel Management Inc. 4375 Sandwich Street Windsor,
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MARATHON DANE COUNTY Branch
STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MARATHON DANE COUNTY Branch SAVE OUR AIR RESOURCES, PAUL SCHWANTES, and ROBERT HUGHES Case No.: Petitioners, Case Code: 30607 vs. Administrative Agency Review WISCONSIN
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED WAHKON WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION MILLE
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED PJM PORK, INC. SWINE FEEDLOT EXPANSION PROJECT COURTLAND
More informationAIR EMISSION PERMIT NO Administrative Amendment IS ISSUED TO. ConAgra Food Ingredients Co
AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 03700020-003 Administrative Amendment IS ISSUED TO ConAgra Food Ingredients Co CONAGRA FLOUR MILL - HASTINGS 2005 South Vermillion Street Hastings, Dakota County, MN 55033 The emission
More informationMinnesota Pollution Control Agency
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency STATE OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency MUNICIPAL DIVISION PUBLIC NOTICE OF INTENT TO REISSUE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)/ STATE
More informationHigh-Efficiency Integrated Solid Wasteto-Energy
High-Efficiency Integrated Solid Wasteto-Energy System Kuanrong Qiu and Skip Hayden CANMET Energy Technology Centre-Ottawa Natural Resources Canada Drivers and Opportunities Landfills not a sustainable
More informationPerham Resource Recovery Facility Expansion Project
Perham Resource Recovery Facility Expansion Project FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MARCH 2013 Prairie Lakes Municipal Solid Waste Authority 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 p-ear2-30f
More informationDRAFT AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO Major Amendment IS ISSUED TO. Miller Milling Co LLC
DRAFT AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 07900006 004 Major Amendment IS ISSUED TO Miller Milling Co LLC Miller Milling Co LLC 100 2nd Avenue Southwest New Prague, Le Sueur County, MN 56071 The emission units, control
More informationAIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. Pope/Douglas Joint Solid Waste Management Board
AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 04100021-003 IS ISSUED TO Pope/Douglas Joint Solid Waste Management Board POPE/DOUGLAS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 2115 Jefferson Street South Alexandria, Douglas County, MN 56308 The
More informationMinnesota s State Implementation Plan
Minnesota s State Implementation Plan What is in Minnesota s SIP? SIPs that were submitted by states to the EPA and acted upon by the EPA are listed in 40 CFR pt. 52. Minnesota s SIP is identified in 40
More informationMINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD
Next Publication: August 20, 2012 Vol. 36, No. 16 Submittal Deadline: August 13, 2012 Submit to EQB.Monitor@state.mn.us Subscribe to receive the EQB Monitor. If you would like to receive the Monitor regularly,
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED FLINT HILLS RESOURCES, LP - ULTRA LOW SULFUR DIESEL
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED MINNESOTA SOYBEAN PROCESSORS COOPERATIVE OILSEED PROCESSING
More informationMinnesota Pollution Control Agency
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency STATE OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency MUNICIPAL DIVISION PUBLIC NOTICE OF INTENT TO REISSUE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)/ STATE
More informationAIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. Van Hoven Company, Inc.
AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 03700070-001 IS ISSUED TO Van Hoven Company, Inc. VAN HOVEN COMPANY, INC. 505 Hardman Avenue South South Saint Paul, Dakota County, Minnesota 55075-2413 The emission units, control
More informationGOVERNMENT of PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD
GOVERNMENT of PUERTO RICO OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD Air Quality Area STATEMENT OF BASIS Title V Initial Permit The Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board (EQB) is issuing a draft
More informationMinnesota Pollution Control Agency
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency STATE OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency INDUSTRIAL DIVISION PUBLIC NOTICE OF INTENT TO REISSUE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)/
More informationMinnesota Pollution Control Agency
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency STATE OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency INDUSTRIAL DIVISION PUBLIC NOTICE OF INTENT TO REISSUE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)/
More informationMn/DOT Outstate District SWPPP
SWPPP Table of Contents Introduction......4 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH...5 Distribute Educational Materials...5 Implement an Education Program...6 Education Program: Public Education and Outreach...7
More informationMPCA Citizens Board. Michael Sandusky Director Environment Analysis and Outcomes Division
DEPARTMENT : POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY DATE : September 17, 2010 SF-00006-05(4/86) STATE OF MINNESOTA Office Memorandum TO : FROM : MPCA Citizens Board Michael Sandusky Director Environment Analysis and
More informationNAWTEC UNIQUE ELEMENTS OF THE OLMSTED COUNTY FACILITY EXPANSION
Sixteenth Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference Proceedings of NAWTEC16 16th Annual North May American 19-21, 2008, Waste-to-Energy Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Conference May 19-21, 2008, Philadelphia,
More information2. How can the University have an expansion of the Cogeneration Facility without an increase in the amount of coal used?
Responses to Questions Raised at the November 9, 2005 Public Hearing on the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill s Special Use Permit Modification Request 1. What is the nature of the surveying
More informationCCR COMPLIANCE FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN. Prepared for: Tucson Electric Power Company Springerville Generating Station Springerville, Arizona
CCR COMPLIANCE FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL PLAN Prepared for: Tucson Electric Power Company Springerville Generating Station Springerville, Arizona Prepared by: CB&I Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. Pittsburgh,
More informationASA Bloomingburg, LLC. Air permit-to-install (PTI) number Public Hearing Date April 18, 2006 Comment Period End Date April 25, 2006
ASA Bloomingburg, LLC Air permit-to-install (PTI) number 01-01306 Public Hearing Date April 18, 2006 Comment Period End Date April 25, 2006 Summary of Comments and Ohio EPA Responses August 2006 Introduction
More informationDecember For additional information, contact: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD
A Working Citizen s with Guide: Consultants: An Introduction A Guide to for Environmental Project Proposers Review The Environmental Quality Board (EQB) draws together the Governor s Office, five citizens
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED BUFFALO LAKE ETHANOL, LLC FAIRMONT, MINNESOTA FINDINGS
More informationMANDATORY CATEGORIES RULEMAKING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD (BEGINS AT 9AM)
MANDATORY CATEGORIES RULEMAKING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARD (BEGINS AT 9AM) PRESENTATIONS AT 9AM, 10:30AM (AS TIME ALLOWS) Background Rulemaking Project Charter Communication Proposed
More informationVariance Request Form
Variance Request Form Ocotillo Express Wind LLC Variance: 019 Pier 1 Bay 3 Request No.: Rev 0 San Francisco CA 94111 Date Submit: _8/30/2012 415-283-4000 Date Approval Needed: 9/6/2012 Date Agency Received:
More informationAIR EMISSION PERMIT NO [AMENDMENT TO AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO ] IS ISSUED TO
AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 05301050-021 [AMENDMENT TO AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 05301050-011] IS ISSUED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA AND FOSTER WHEELER TWIN CITIES, INC. FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN
More informationADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION. LCB File No. R Effective January 28, 2010
ADOPTED REGULATION OF THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION LCB File No. R004-09 Effective January 28, 2010 EXPLANATION Matter in italics is new; matter in brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted.
More informationPlease note that comment letters submitted to the MPCA do become public documents and will be part of the official public record for this project.
November 4, 2005 TO: INTERESTED PARTIES RE: Enclosed is the (EAW) for the proposed Elk River Landfill Internal Combustion Engine D, City of Elk River, Sherburne County. The EAW was prepared by the Minnesota
More informationSYCAMORE COGENERATION PROJECT (84-AFC-6C)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1516 NINTH STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-5512 www.energy.ca.gov DATE: October 13, 2011 TO: FROM: Interested
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF A REQUEST FOR A CONTESTED CASE HEARING
ATTACHMENT 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF A REQUEST FOR A CONTESTED CASE HEARING ON AND THE PROPOSED ISSUANCE OF AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO.13700063-004 FOR UNITED
More informationNSPS for Dc Boilers Burning Residual Oil
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency AQ Doc. # 8.07 February 1998 Facts about NSPS for Dc Boilers Burning Residual Oil In an effort to regulate new sources of air pollution and ensure that those sources
More informationEnvironmental Information Worksheet
Environmental Information Worksheet Water System Owner (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Needs and Alternatives Provide a brief narrative that describes: Current drinking water system needs. Project
More informationEssar Steel Minnesota L.L.C. Supplement to Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) Preparation Notice
Essar Steel Minnesota L.L.C. Supplement to Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) Preparation Notice I. Title of EIS being supplemented and dates of completion: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Minnesota
More informationVIRIDOR WASTE MANAGEMENT ARDLEY EFW PLANT EP APPLICATION - NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY
VIRIDOR WASTE MANAGEMENT ARDLEY EFW PLANT EP APPLICATION - NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY S1014-0340-0008MPW NTS Rev1.doc Print Date 19 February 2009 ISSUE NUMBER 1 DATE 19/02/09 AUTHOR CHECKED MPW SMO Title Page
More informationCHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1300
CHAPTER 2003-144 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 1300 An act relating to citrus; amending s. 403.08725, F.S.; redefining the terms new sources and existing sources ; amending
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
p-ear2-94b STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CITY OF MORGAN CONSTRUCTION OF WASTEWATER
More informationMining and Our Natural Resources
Mining and Our Natural Resources February 28, 2008 Jennifer Engstrom Division of Lands and Minerals MN Department of Natural Resources Overview Brief overview of environmental review Permit to Mine for
More information[Including Revisions to Affected Portions of the Interstate Transport SIP for the hour Ozone and 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS]
[Including Revisions to Affected Portions of the Interstate Transport SIP for the 1997 8-hour Ozone and 1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS] Department of Environmental Quality March 20, 2013 Table of Contents List of Tables...
More informationPublic Notice ISSUED: April 5, 2019 EXPIRES: May 6, 2019
APPLICANT: Aitkin County Highway Department Public Notice ISSUED: April 5, 2019 EXPIRES: May 6, 2019 REFER TO: MVP-2019-00387-EJI SECTION: 404 - Clean Water Act 1. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO discharge fill
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEETS EAW Comment Deadline: December 19, 2007
Next Publication: December 3, 2007 Vol. 31, No. 24 Submittal Deadline: November 26, 2007 Project Title: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEETS EAW Comment Deadline: December 19, 2007 Project Title: Northern
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to reviewers: The Worksheet (EAW) provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. This EAW was prepared by
More informationSTATEMENT OF BASIS for NEWARK BAY COGENERATION PARTNERSHIP L.P.
I. FACILITY INFORMATION Newark Bay Cogeneration Partnership L.P. is located at 414-514 Avenue P, Newark, New Jersey, Essex County and consists of a 120-megawatt cogeneration plant. The facility is owned
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED PLAINVIEW ELGIN WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
More informationRULE Prevention of Significant Deterioration Adopted 9/24/84, Amended 11/18/85, 9/2/99, Amended 1/12/12 (Effective 2/8/13)
RULE 210.4 Prevention of Significant Deterioration Adopted 9/24/84, Amended 11/18/85, 9/2/99, Amended 1/12/12 (Effective 2/8/13) I. Purpose The purpose of this Rule is to include the federal Prevention
More informationEPA EMISSION RULES - BOILERS
EPA EMISSION RULES - BOILERS WHAT S NEXT FOR OWNER AND OPERATORS? On March 21, 2011 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency published three rules regarding air emission standards in the Federal Register.
More informationCarpinteria Valley Water District Carpinteria Advanced Purification Project
NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND SCOPING MEETING Carpinteria Valley Water District Carpinteria Advanced Purification Project TO: Agencies, Organizations, and Interested Parties DATE: January 7, 2019 SUBJECT:
More informationNOTICE OF EIS PREPARATION
Next Publication: June 11, 2012 Vol. 36, No. 11 Submittal Deadline: June 4, 2012 Submit to EQB.Monitor@state.mn.us Subscribe to receive the EQB Monitor. If you would like to receive the Monitor regularly,
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
ATTACHMENT 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED POET BIOREFINING-GLENVILLE WEST ETHANOL
More informationRegulatory and Permitting. for Metallic Mining in Minnesota
Regulatory and Permitting Framework for Metallic Mining in Minnesota Jennifer Engstrom Reclamation Manager Division of Lands and Minerals Department of Natural Resources May 6, 2010 Overview of Presentation
More informationFinal Environmental Impact Statement Addendum: Agreement for the Central Corridor Light Rail Transit Project through the University of Minnesota,
Final Environmental Impact Statement Addendum: Agreement for the Central Corridor Light Rail Transit Project through the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities-Minneapolis Campus OCTOBER 2010 I. Background
More informationPoly Met Mining, Inc. Antidegradation Review - Preliminary Determination for 401 Certification
Poly Met Mining, Inc. Antidegradation Review - Preliminary Determination for 401 Certification Summary Poly Met Mining, Inc. (PolyMet) submitted an application for a Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality
More informationCITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Jeff Schneider, Deputy Director of Public Works Tina Folch, Contracts Administrator Agenda Item No.: Meeting Date: December
More informationCommunity Development Committee Meeting date: January 16, 2006
C Community Development Committee Meeting date: January 16, 2006 Executive Summary Item: 2007 22 Metropolitan Council meeting date: January 24, 2007 ADVISORY INFORMATION Date: January 10, 2007 Subject:
More informationAIR EMISSION PERMIT NO IS ISSUED TO. Northern States Power Company
AIR EMISSION PERMIT NO. 01300015-001 IS ISSUED TO Northern States Power Company NSP - Key City/Wilmarth 1040 Summit Avenue Mankato, Blue Earth County, Minnesota 56001 The emission units, control equipment
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
ATTACHMENT 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION TO REISSUE THE MINNESOTA NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED BINFORD FARMS SECTION 4 FEEDLOT EXPANSION MAGNOLIA
More informationENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEETS
June 5, 2006 EQB Monitor ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEETS Comments due on July 5, 2006 Meadowbrook Description: Meadowbrook is a 232 acre project located in Sections 12 and 13, Township 33, Range 27,
More informationATTACHMENTS: 1. Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law, and Order 5/24/07
The MPCA is the governmental unit responsible for preparing an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) when an animal feedlot project meets the thresholds specified in Minn. R. 4410.4300, subp. 29A. As
More informationSeptember 16, EQB Board Members. George Edwin Johnson EQB Staff
September 16, 2004 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: EQB Board Members George Edwin Johnson EQB Staff 651 296-2888 Two Permits for Mankato Energy Center (MEC) Site Permit (655 megawatt Large Electric Power Generating
More informationDRAFT Subject to modifications
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 7 From: Date: Staff July 17, 2009 Council Meeting Subject: Florida Power and Light Company Riviera Beach Energy
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
STATE OF MINNESOTA BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Nancy Lange Dan Lipschultz Matthew Schuerger John Tuma Katie Sieben Chair Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner In the Matter of
More informationMinnesota EAW Supplement
Appendix I: Minnesota EAW Supplement Lower Pool 2 Channel Management Study: Boulanger Bend to Lock and Dam No. 2 Minnesota EAW Item Identification A supplement prepared for the Minnesota DNR to identify
More informationNational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/ State Disposal System (SDS) Permit Program Fact Sheet Permit Reissuance MNG960000
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/ State Disposal System (SDS) Permit Program Fact Sheet Permit Reissuance Permittee: Facility name: Multiple Industrial By-Product General Permit
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF MINNESOTA MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED ARMSTRONG FEEDLOT FREEDOM TOWNSHIP/WASECA COUNTY WASECA,
More information