Field Instructor Evaluation Rating (1 item, mean 3

Transcription

1 ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES (FOUNDATION COURSES) UNIVERSITY OF ST. FRANCIS MASTERS OF SOCIAL WK PROGRAM LAST COMPLETED ON JUNE 2016 Form AS 4 A This form is used to assist the COA in the evaluation of the program s compliance with Accreditation Standards stated below The program provides evidence of ongoing data collection and analysis and discusses how it uses assessment data to affirm and/or make changes in the explicit and implicit curriculum to enhance student performance The program appends the summary data for each measure used to assess the attainment of each competency for at least one academic year prior to the submission of the self-study. All Council on Social Work Education programs measure and report student learning outcomes. Students are assessed on their mastery of the competencies which comprise the accreditation standards of the Council on Social Work Education. These competencies are dimensions of social work practice which all social workers are expected to master during their professional training. A measurement benchmark is set by the social work programs for each competency. An assessment score at or above that benchmark is considered by the program to represent mastery of that particular competency. COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 1. Identify as a Professional Social Worker 1.Advocate for client access to services 2. Practice personal reflection and self-correction to assure continual professional development. Field Instructor Evaluation Rating (1 item, mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark: Score 75% A. SWRK 500:Generalist Practice I Assignment Completion of Psychosocial Assessment/Proposed Intervention/Prevention model Benchmark: B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (3 items, score 3 on 3pt scale) Benchmark: Score 100% C. SWRK 500: Generalist Practice I Reflection Assignment: Critique of Video Interviews Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 1 N=9 Psychosocial Assessment Aggregate Grade N= % met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 2 N=9 Field Liaison Evaluation Attitudes : a. Student willingly accepts assignments b. Student asks for information and suggestions c. Student shares observations Students critically reflect on two videoed role play exercises and examine their skill development though self-evaluation and reflection on peer feedback. N=10 N= % met benchmark

2 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 1. Continued 3. Attend to professional roles and boundaries. 4. Demonstrate professional demeanor B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (2 items, score 3 on 3 pt scale) Benchmark: Score100% C. SWRK 500: Generalist Practice I Reflection Assignment: Critique of Video Interviews Benchmark: B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (5 items, score 3 on 3 pt scale). Benchmark: Score 100% C. Generalist Practice I Reflection Benchmark: D. Generalist Practice I - Assignment: Critique of Video Interviews Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 3 N=9 Field Liaison Evaluation Communication Skills/Attitudes a. Student adheres to Field policies, b. Behavior reflects basic understanding of field instruction Students critically reflect on two videoed role play exercises and examine their skill development though self-evaluation and reflection on peer feedback N=10 N= % met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 4 N=9 Field Liaison Evaluation Work Habits a. Student is on time to class, b. Comes to seminar regularly, c. Advises of absences in advance, d. Completes work on-time e. Work adheres to proper format. Reflection Paper Aggregate Grade Students critically reflect on two videoed role play exercises and examine their skill development though self-evaluation and reflection on peer feedback N=10 40% met benchmark N= %met benchmark 5. Use supervision and consultation. pt scale) Benchmark: Score 75% B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (1 item, score 3 on 3 pt) Benchmark: Score100% Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 5 N=9 Field Liaison Evaluation Student demonstrated the ability to use the supervisory relationship. N=10 90% met benchmark

3 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 1. Continued 6. Engage in career-long learning 3 on 4 pt scale). Benchmark: Score 75% B. Generalist Practice I Personal History Paper Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 6 N=9 Personal History Paper Aggregate Grade N= % met benchmark C. Generalist Practice I - Assignment Critique of Video Interviews. Benchmark: Interview Critique Aggregate Grade N= % met benchmark 7. Recognize and manage personal values in a way that allows professional values to guide practice. B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (1 item, score 3 on 3 pt scale) Benchmark: Score 100% C. Generalist Practice I Assignment: Personal History Paper Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 7 N=9 Field Liaison Evaluation Students has an understanding of the NASW Code of Ethics Personal History Paper - Specifically sections 3 and 4 of rubric N=10 N= % met benchmark 2. Apply Ethical Principles 8. Make ethical decisions by applying the NASW Code of Ethics. B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (1 item, score 3 on 3 pt scale) Benchmark: Score 100% C. SWRK 516: Policy II: Paper #1: Why Care for the Stranger Benchmark Score Field Evaluation Section 2, Behavior 1 N=9 Field Liaison Evaluation Student has an understanding of the NASW Code of Ethics N=10 Paper Aggregate Grade N=11 9. Tolerate ambiguity in resolving ethical conflicts B. SWRK 516: Policy II: Paper #2: Social Reform and/or Treatment of the Individual Benchmark: Score Field Evaluation Section 2, Behavior 2 N=9 Paper Aggregate Grade N=11 84% met benchmark

4 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 2. Continued 10. Apply strategies of ethical reasoning to arrive at principled decisions. B. Field Evaluation Section 2, Behavior 3 N=9 3. Apply Critical Thinking 11. Distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom. 12. Analyze models of assessment, prevention, intervention, and evaluation. 13. Demonstrate effective oral and written communication in working with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and colleagues. B. SWRK 515 Completion of Evidence-based Practice Assignment Benchmark: B. SWRK500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Assignment Completion of Psychosocial Assessment/Proposed Intervention/Prevention model Benchmark: B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (3 items, score 3 on 3 pt scale) Benchmark: Score 100% Field Evaluation Section 3, Behavior 1 N=9 Evidence Practice Assignment - Specifically integrates practice wisdom and research-based knowledge. N=3 99% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 3, Behavior 2 N=9 Psychosocial Assessment Aggregate Grade N= % met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 3, Behavior 3 N=9 Field Liaison Evaluation - Communication Skills a. Demonstrates ability to write in standard English b. Speak clearly and appropriately c. Present material to audiences. N=10 70% met benchmark 4. Engage Diversity in Practice 14. Recognize to the extent to which a culture s structures and values may oppress, marginalize, alienate, or create/enhance privilege and power. B. SWRK 500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Reflection Assignment on Cultural Competence Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 4, Behavior 1 N=9 Reflection paper aggregate grade N=17 95%met benchmark

5 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 4. Continued 15. Gain sufficient selfawareness to eliminate personal biases and values when working with diverse groups. 16. Recognize and communicate their understanding of the importance of difference in shaping experiences. 17. View themselves as learners and engage those with whom they work as informants. B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (2 items, score 3 on 3 pt scale) Benchmark: Score 100% C. SWRK 500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Reflection Assignment on Cultural Competence Benchmark: B. SWRK 500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Reflection Assignment on Cultural Competence Benchmark: B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (1 item, score 3 on 3 pt scale).benchmark: Score 100% Field Evaluation Section 4, Behavior 2 N=9 Field Liaison Evaluation Skills a. Student shows an understanding of the social work approach. b. Student has an understanding of the NASW Code of Ethics N=10 90% met benchmark Reflection paper aggregate grade N=17 95%met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 4, Behavior 3 N=9 Reflection paper aggregate grade N=17 95%met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 4, Behavior 4 N=9 Field Evaluation Skills Students behavior reflects understanding of field instruction. N=10 90% met benchmark 5. Advance Human Rights/ Social and Economic Justice 18. Understand the mechanisms of oppression and discrimination. pt scale) Benchmark: Score 75% B. SWRK 500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Reflection Assignment on Cultural Competence Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 5, Behavior 1 N=9 Reflection paper aggregate grade N=17 95%met benchmark 19. Advocate for human rights and social and economic justice. B. SWRK 511: Social Work Generalist Practice II: Macro Practice Group Assignment Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 5, Behavior 2 N=9 Students work in a task group to plan, research, develop, and present an effective intervention strategy for a community need that demonstrates cultural competent social with practice with complex systems 96% met benchmark COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK

6 5. Continued 20. Engage in practices that advance social and economic justice. B. SWRK 511: Social Work Generalist Practice II: Macro Practice Group Assignment Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 5, Behavior 3 N=9 Students work in a task group to plan, research, develop, and present an effective intervention strategy for a community need that demonstrates cultural competent social with practice with complex systems 96% met benchmark 6. Engage Research Informed Practice/ Practice Informed Research 21. Use practice experience to inform scientific inquiry B. SWRK 503- Social Work Research Complete Research Proposal Benchmark: Score 80% Field Evaluation Section 6, Behavior 1 N=9 Research Proposal Aggregate Grade N=14 85% met benchmark 22. Use research evidence to inform practice. B. SWRK 515: Field Practicum Seminar II - Evidence-based practice Assignment Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 6, Behavior 2 N=9 Aggregate grade N=2 50% met benchmark 7. Human Behavior Knowledge 23. Utilize conceptual frameworks to guide the processes of assessment, intervention, and evaluation. B. SWRK500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Assignment Completion of Psychosocial Assessment/Proposed Intervention/Prevention model Benchmark: C. SWRK 501: Human Behavior and the Social Environment Theory Critiques Benchmark: D. SWRK 501: Human Behavior and the Social Environment Population-at-Risk Paper Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 7, Behavior 1 N=9 Psychosocial Assessment Aggregate Grade N= % met benchmark Written critique aggregate grade N=18 94% met benchmark Paper Aggregate Grade N=18 94% met benchmark

7 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 7. Continued 24. Critique and apply knowledge to understand persons and the environment. B. SWRK500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Assignment Completion of Psychosocial Assessment/Proposed Intervention/Prevention model Benchmark: C. SWRK 501: Human Behavior and the Social Environment Theory Critiques Benchmark: D. SWRK 501: Human Behavior and the Social Environment - Population-at-Risk Paper Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 7, Behavior 2 N=9 Psychosocial Assessment Aggregate Grade N= % met benchmark Written critique aggregate grade N=18 94% met benchmark Paper Aggregate Grade N=18 94% met benchmark 8. Engage Policy Practice to Advance Well- Being and Deliver Services 25. Analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance social well-being. 26. Collaborate with colleagues and clients for effective policy action. B. SWRK 511: Social Work Generalist Practice II: Macro Practice Group Assignment Benchmark: C. SWRK 502: Social Work Policy I: Analysis and Practice Benchmark: 3 on 4 pt scale)benchmark: Score 75% B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (1 item, score 3 on 3 pt scale) Benchmark: Score 100% Field Evaluation Section 8, Behavior 1 N=9 Students work in a task group to plan, research, develop, and present an effective intervention strategy for a community need that demonstrates cultural competent social with practice with complex systems 96% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 8, Behavior 2 N=9 Field Liaison Evaluation Skills a. Student shows an understanding of the social work approach. b. Student expresses interest in the profession N=10 90% met benchmark

8 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 9. Respond to Practice Contexts 27. Continuously discover, appraise, and attend locales, populations, scientific and technological developments and emerging societal trends to provide relevant service. 28. Provide leadership in promoting sustainable changes in service delivery and practice to improve the quality of social services. B. SWRK 511: Social Work Generalist Practice II: Macro Practice Group Assignment Benchmark: B. SWRK 511: Social Work Generalist Practice II: Macro Practice Group Assignment Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 9, Behavior 1 N=9 Students work in a task group to plan, research, develop, and present an effective intervention strategy for a community need that demonstrates cultural competent social with practice with complex systems 96% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 9, Behavior 2 N=9 Students work in a task group to plan, research, develop, and present an effective intervention strategy for a community need that demonstrates cultural competent social with practice with complex systems 96% met benchmark 10a.Practice Engagement 29. Substantively and affectively prepare for action with individuals, families, groups, organizations and communities. 30. Use empathy and other interpersonal skills. B. SWRK500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Assignment Completion of Psychosocial Assessment/Proposed Intervention/Prevention model Benchmark 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark: Score 88% B. SWRK 500: Generalist Practice I - Assignment Critique of Video Interviews Benchmark: Score 85% C. SWRK 515: Field Practicum Seminar II Process Recording Assignment Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 1 N=9 Psychosocial Assessment Aggregate Grade N= % met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 2 N=9 Students critically reflect on two videoed role play exercises and examine their skill development though self-evaluation and reflection on peer feedback, learning the value of peer and instructor consultation. N= % met benchmark Process recording aggregate grade N=7 85% met benchmark

9 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 10a. Continued 31. Develop mutually agreedon focus of work and desired outcomes. B. SWRK 500: Generalist Practice I - Assignment Critique of Video Interviews Benchmark: C. SWRK 515B: Field Practicum Seminar II Case Presentation Assignment Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 3 N=9 Students critically reflect on two videoed role play exercises and examine their skill development though self-evaluation and reflection on peer feedback, learning the value of peer and instructor consultation. N= % met benchmark Case presentation aggregate grade N=4 10b. Practice Assessment 32. Collect, organize, and interpret client data B. SWRK 500: Generalist Practice I - Assignment Critique of Video Interviews Benchmark: Score 85% C. SWRK 515: Field Practicum Seminar II Case Presentation Assignment Benchmark: Score 85% Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 4 N=9 Written critique aggregate grade N= % met benchmark Case presentation aggregate grade N=7 85% met benchmark 33.Assess client strengths and limitations B. SWRK500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Assignment Completion of Psychosocial Assessment/Proposed Intervention/Prevention model Benchmark: C. SWRK 515: Field Practicum Seminar II Case Presentation Assignment Benchmark: Score 85% Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 5 N=9 Psychosocial Assessment Aggregate Grade N= % Case presentation aggregate grade N=7 85% met benchmark

10 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 10b. Continued 34. Develop mutually agreedon intervention goals and objectives. 35. Select appropriate intervention strategies. B. SWRK 500: Generalist Practice I - Assignment Critique of Video Interviews Benchmark: Score 85% C. SWRK500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Assignment Completion of Psychosocial Assessment/Proposed Intervention model Benchmark: B. SWRK500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Assignment Completion of Psychosocial Assessment/Proposed Intervention model Benchmark: C. SWRK 515: Field Practicum Seminar II Case Presentation Assignment Benchmark: Score 85% Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 6 N=9 Written critique aggregate grades N= % met benchmark Psychosocial Assessment Aggregate Grade N= %met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 7 N=9 Psychosocial Assessment Aggregate Grade N= %met benchmark Case presentation aggregate grade N=7 85.7% met benchmark 10c. Practice Intervention 36. Initiate actions in order to achieve organization goals 37. Implement prevention interventions that enhance client capacities. B. SWRK 511- Task Group Assignment Benchmark: B. SWRK500: Social Work Generalist Practice I Assignment Completion of Psychosocial Assessment/Proposed Intervention/Prevention model Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 8 N=9 Task Group that student participated in to complete Macro Project Assignment 90.3% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 9 N=9 Psychosocial Assessment Aggregate Grade N= % met benchmark

11 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVI COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 38. Help clients resolve problems. 39. Negotiate, mediate, and advocate for clients. 40. Facilitate transitions and endings B. SWRK 500: Generalist Practice I - Assignment Critique of Video Interviews Benchmark: Score 85% C. SWRK 515: Field Practicum Seminar II Case Presentation Assignment Benchmark: Score 85% B. SWRK 515: Field Practicum Seminar II Case Presentation Assignment Benchmark: Score 85% B. SWRK 515B: Field Practicum Seminar II Case Presentation Assignment Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 10 N=9 Aggregate grade N= % met benchmark Case presentation aggregate grade N=7 85.7% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 11 N=9 Case presentation aggregate grade N=7 85.7% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 12 N=9 Case presentation aggregate grade N=4 10d. Practice Evaluation 41. Critically analyze, monitor, and evaluate interventions B. SWRK 515B: Field Practicum Seminar II Case Presentation Assignment Benchmark: Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 13 N=9 Case presentation aggregate grade N=4

12 ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES (ADVANCED COURSES) UNIVERSITY OF ST. FRANCIS MASTERS OF SOCIAL WK PROGRAM LAST COMPLETED ON JUNE 2013 Form AS 4B This form is used to assist the COA in the evaluation of the program s compliance with Accreditation Standards stated below The program provides evidence of ongoing data collection and analysis and discusses how it uses assessment data to affirm and/or make changes in the explicit and implicit curriculum to enhance student performance The program appends the summary data for each measure used to assess the attainment of each competency for at least one academic year prior to the submission of the self-study. All Council on Social Work Education programs measure and report student learning outcomes. Students are assessed on their mastery of the competencies which comprise the accreditation standards of the Council on Social Work Education. These competencies are dimensions of social work practice which all social workers are expected to master during their professional training. A measurement benchmark is set by the social work programs for each competency. An assessment score at or above that benchmark is considered by the program to represent mastery of that particular competency. COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVIS COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 1. Identify as a Professional Social Worker. 1. Demonstrates leadership that advanced professional social work practice within the advanced generalist values of empowerment, social justice, and cultural competence. 2. Understands and articulates the advanced generalist practice model of social work practice. 3. Demonstrates competency at an advanced level in organizing and managing professional duties and responsibilities. A. Field Instructor Evaluation Rating (1 item; mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark Score 75% B. Advanced Generalist Practice I Self-evaluation. Benchmark A. Field Instructor Evaluation Rating (1 item; mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark 75% B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (1 item, score 3 on 3pt scale) Benchmark 100% 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark 75% B. EBP Presentation (Clinical Experience; 36/45points) Benchmark 80% Field Evaluation Section I, Practice Behavior 1 N=27 89% met benchmark Self-evaluation aggregate grade Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 2 N=27 Field Liaison Evaluation, Skills Student shows understanding of the social work approach n=31 Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 3 N=27 50% met benchmark COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVIS COMPETENCY BENCHMARK

13 1. Continued 4. Appropriately represents agency and/or organization in a professional manner to multiple constituencies 5. Is purposeful and selfreflective in planning professional development and career-long learning. 6. Seeks and accepts feedback, support, and constructive criticism from supervisors and colleagues to enhance advanced generalist practice. 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark 88% mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark 88% 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark 88% B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (2 items, score 3 on pt scale) Benchmark 100% C. Advanced Practice I Reaction to Videotaping small group role-play. Benchmark 85% Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 4 Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 5 N=27 67% met benchmark N=27 67% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 1, Behavior 6 N=27 Field Liaison Evaluation, Professional Attitude/Skills a. Student willingly accepts assignments, b. Student demonstrates the ability to use the supervisory relationship. n=31 Reaction paper aggregate grade 100 % met benchmark 2. Apply Ethical Principles. 7. Recognizes and manages personal biases as they affect the clientworker relationship within advanced generalist practice. B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (1 item, score 3 on 3 pt scale) Benchmark 100% C. Journal (Part II; 20/25) Benchmark 80% Field Evaluation Section 2, Behavior 1 N=27 79% met benchmark Field Liaison Evaluation: Professional Attitudes, Student shares observations. n=31 84% met benchmark Journal Aggregate Grade N=30 87% met benchmark

14 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVIS COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 2. Continued 8. Demonstrates advanced skills in ethical decisionmaking and ability to resolve value conflicts consistent with the NASW Code of Ethic 9. Employs a critical analysis of various options when exploring increasingly complex ethical dilemmas 10. Applies values of empowerment, social justice and cultural competency to ethical decision-making B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (1 item, score 3 on 3 pt scale) Benchmark 100% C. SWRK 604: Ethical Issues in Contemporary Social Work Paper Assignment: Ethical Reasoning Regarding Ethical Dilemmas in Your Agency (utilizing the NASW Code Ethics) Benchmark pt scale) Benchmark 88% B. SWRK 604: Ethical Issues in Contemporary Social Work Paper Assignment: Analyzing and Making a Decision about an Ethical Dilemma Benchmark pt scale) Benchmark 88% B. Advanced Generalist Practice II Paper Assignment on Agency Ethical Issues Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 2, Behavior 2 N=27 Field Liaison Evaluation: Skills, Student has the understanding of NASW Code of Ethics. Paper aggregate grade n=31 N=11 Field Evaluation Section 2, Behavior 3 N=27 Paper aggregate grade N=11 Field Evaluation Section 2, Behavior 4 N=27 82% met benchmark Paper aggregate grade N=13 92% met benchmark 3. Apply Critical Thinking. 11. Distinguishes, appraises, and integrates culturally sensitive evidence-based knowledge into Advanced Generalist Practice. 12. Evaluates, selects, and implements appropriate multidimensional assessment, intervention, and evaluation tools. B. EBP Presentation (Conclusion; 20/25) Benchmark 80% B. Advanced Practice I Group Presentation on theories of helping, present role-play based on model. Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 3, Behavior 1 N=27 60% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 3, Behavior 2 N=27

15 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVIS COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 3. Continued 13. Effectively communicates professional judgments to other social workers and to professionals from other disciplines, in both verbal and written formats. pt scale) Benchmark Score 88% B. Field Liaison Evaluation Rating (3 items, score 3 on 3 pt scale) Benchmark Score 100% C. Journal (Part I; 20/25) Benchmark Score 80% Field Evaluation Section 3, Behavior 3 N=27 Field Liaison Evaluation: Communication Skills, Student demonstrates ability to write in standard English, speak clearly and appropriately, and present material to an audience of peers, faculty, or community. N=31 90% met benchmark Journal Aggregate grade N=30 87% met benchmark 4. Engage in Diversity in Practice. 14. Assesses policies and practice to advance cultural competency and social justice 15. Uses culturally appropriate practice methods that foster enhanced cultural identity and empowerment. 16. Demonstrates compassion and acceptance of difference in working with diverse client systems. 17. Researches and applies knowledge of diverse cultures to advanced generalist practice. mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark Score 88% B. SWRK 615 Cross-Cultural Practice Systems Cultural Competence Self- Assessments/Reflection. Benchmark Score 90% mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark Score 88% B. EBP Presentation (Client Preferences; 20/25) Benchmark Score 80% mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark Score 88% mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark Score 88% B. Journal (Part III; 20/25) Benchmark Score 80% Field Evaluation Section 4, Behavior 1 N=27 Reflection paper aggregate grade N=8 Field Evaluation Section 4, Behavior 2 N=27 89% met benchmark Paper aggregate grade 75% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 4, Behavior 3 N=27 78% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 4, Behavior 4 N=27 Journal Aggregate grade N=30 97% met benchmark COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVIS COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 5. Advance Human Rights/Social Justice 18. Applies knowledge of oppression and pt scale) Benchmark 88% Field Evaluation Section 5, Behavior 1 N=27

16 discrimination to advanced generalist practice 19. Advocates at multiple levels for marginalized and disenfranchised individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. 20. Actively participates with others in creating new, modified, or improved services, resources, and opportunities for client systems B. Cross Cultural Practice Pre/Post Self- Assessments. Benchmark 85% pt scale) Benchmark 88% B. Advanced Generalist Practice II Film reflection paper. Benchmark pt scale) Benchmark 88% B. Advanced Generalist Practice II Paper 3: Macro level dilemmas and students plan to solve. Benchmark 78% met benchmark In-class assessment Aggregate grade N=8 87.5% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 5, Behavior 2 N=27 Paper Assignment Aggregate grade N=13 92% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 5, Behavior 3 N=27 Paper assessment aggregate grade N=13 6. Engage in Research Informed Practice and Practice Informed Research. 21. Provides an advanced rationale for choosing one intervention over another. 22. Participates in the generation of new advanced generalist practice knowledge, through research and practice. B. EBP Presentation (Literature Review ; 75/100) Benchmark 75% A. Field Instructor Evaluation Rating (1 item mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark 88% B. SWRK 613 Advanced Research Methods: Poster Presentation of Program Evaluation Study Benchmark Score: 80% C. SWRK 613 Advanced Research Methods: Presentation of a Logic Model for a Program in Field Placement Benchmark Score: 80% Field Evaluation Section 6, Behavior 1 N=27 N=3 66% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 6, Behavior 2 N=27 Poster Presentation Aggregate Grade N= 10 Logic Model Aggregate Grade 91.3% met benchmark

17 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVIS COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 7. Human Behavior Knowledge. 23. Critically chooses and uses relevant theories, assessments, and diagnostic tools (including DSM-IV-TR) appropriate to the practice setting. 24. Uses an advanced generalist assessment process that incorporates a holistic and complex view of client situations. mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark Score 88% B. Advanced Generalist Practice I Theoretical Model Case Presentation. Benchmark Score 85% mean 3 on 4 pt scale) Benchmark Score 88% B. Comparative Theories Analysis paper: Treatment Practices. Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 7, Behavior 1 N=27 In-class presentation aggregate grade N=13 Field Evaluation Section 7, Behavior 2 N=27 Paper assessment aggregate grade N=19 8. Engage in Policy Practice to Advance Well-Being and Deliver Services 25. Analyzes organizational policies, procedures, resources, and client characteristics to improve services for a specific group or organization 26. Advocates with others for policy change on behalf of a specific group or organization. B. SWRK 615 Cross-Cultural Practice Systems Community Actions/Social Change Paper: Benchmark pt scale) Benchmark 88% B. SWRK 616 Advanced Generalist Practice II Presentation of Macro-Level Dilemmas on Values/Ethics: Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 8, Behavior 1 N=27 78% met benchmark Paper assessment aggregate grade N=8 87.5% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 8, Behavior 2 N=27 78% met benchmark In-class presentation Aggregate grade N=13 9. Respond to Practice Contexts 27. Analyzes current, critical local, state, and/or national policy initiatives that influence practice with agency s clients B. SWRK 601 Advanced Generalist Practice I Group Presentation of Role Play Based on Different Theoretical Paradigms: Benchmark C. SWRK 616 Advanced Generalist Practice II Presentation of Macro-Level Dilemmas on Values/Ethics: Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 9, Behavior 1 N=27 63% met benchmark Group presentation aggregate grade In-class presentation Aggregate grade N=13 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVIS COMPETENCY BENCHMARK 9. Continued D. SWRK 604 Ethical Issues in Contemporary Paper aggregate grade N=11

18 28. Identifies and proposes sustainable changes to programs or services that improve services Social Work Ethical Reasoning Regarding Ethical Dilemmas in Your Agency: Benchmark B. SWRK 601 Advanced Generalist Practice I Group Presentation of Role Play Based on Different Theoretical Paradigms: Benchmark C. SWRK 616 Advanced Generalist Practice II Presentation of Macro-Level Dilemmas on Values/Ethics: Benchmark D. SWRK 604 Ethical Issues in Contemporary Social Work Ethical Reasoning Regarding Ethical Dilemmas in Your Agency: Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 9, Behavior 2 N=27 63% met benchmark Group presentation aggregate grade Group presentation aggregate grade N=13 Paper aggregate grade N=11 Practice Engagement 29. Displays a genuine and authentic quality in working with client systems of all sizes. B. SWRK 601 Advanced General Practice I - Group Presentation of Role Play Based on Different Theoretical Paradigms: Benchmark C. SWRK 616 Advanced General Practice II Presentation of Ethical Responsibility to Assist the Client: Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 1 N=27 78% met benchmark Group presentation aggregate grade Group presentation aggregate grade N=13

19 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVIS COMPETENCY BENCHMARK Practice Assessment 30. Connects with clients using respectful, empathetic, and culturally competent approaches. 31. Establishes an empowerment and strengths based process that encourages clients to be equal participants in the establishment of goals and interventions. 32. Conducts a multidimensional and comprehensive assessment that is appropriate to the agency and community context. 33. Identifies clients strengths as well as limitations and appropriately uses this information for advanced interventions. B. SWRK 601 Advanced General Practice I, Process Recording: Benchmark C. SWRK 616 Advanced General Practice II - Presentation of Ethical Responsibility to Assist the Client: Benchmark B. SWRK 604 Ethical Issues in Contemporary Social Work Ethical Reasoning Regarding Ethical Dilemmas in Your Agency: Benchmark B. SWRK 604 Ethical Issues in Contemporary Social Work Ethical Reasoning Regarding Ethical Dilemmas in Your Agency: Benchmark B. SWRK 601 Advanced Generalist Practice I Process Recording: Benchmark C. SWRK 616 Advanced General Practice II - Presentation of Ethical Responsibility to Assist the Client: Benchmark D. SWRK 604 Ethical Issues in Contemporary Social Work Ethical Reasoning Regarding Ethical Dilemmas in Your Agency: Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 2 N=27 67% met benchmark Process recording aggregate grade Presentation aggregate grade N=13 Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 3 N=27 Paper aggregate grade N=11 Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 4 N=27 60% met benchmark Paper aggregate grade N=11 Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 5 N=27 67% met benchmark Process recording aggregate grade Presentation aggregate grade N=13 Paper aggregate grade N=11

20 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVIS COMPETENCY BENCHMARK Practice Intervention 34. Manages transitions and change in complex client interactions 35. Selects and modifies evidence-based intervention strategies based on continuous multidimensional assessment. 36. Provides leadership to identify and achieve group, organization, or community goals. 37. Develops and implements collaborative strategies to address group, family, organization, or community issues. pt scale) Benchmark 88% B. SWRK 601 Advanced General Practice I - Group Presentation of Role Play Based on Different Theoretical Paradigms: Benchmark C. SWRK 616 Advanced General Practice II Presentation of Ethical Responsibility to Assist the Client: Benchmark A. Field Instructor Evaluation Rating ( 1 item, B. SWRK 604 Ethical Issues in Contemporary Social Work Ethical Reasoning Regarding Ethical Dilemmas in Your Agency: Benchmark B. SWRK 601 Advanced General Practice I - Group Presentation of Role Play Based on Different Theoretical Paradigms: Benchmark C. SWRK 616 Advanced Generalist Practice II Presentation of Macro-Level Dilemmas on Values/Ethics: Benchmark B. SWRK 616 Advanced Generalist Practice II Presentation of Macro-Level Dilemmas on Values/Ethics: Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 6 N=27 74% met benchmark Group presentation aggregate grade Presentation aggregate grade N=13 Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 7 N=27 67% met benchmark Paper aggregate grade Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 8 N=27 78% met benchmark Group presentation aggregate grade Presentation aggregate grade N=13 Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 9 N=27 Presentation aggregate grade N=13

21 COMPETENCY PRACTICE BEHAVIS COMPETENCY BENCHMARK Practice Evaluation 38. Initiates actions to achieve organizational goals 39. Demonstrates advanced generalist skills in facilitating or co-facilitating groups. 40. Uses management and planning skills to enhance agency and program capacities 41. Facilitates transitions and endings in his or her relationships with client 42. Evaluates the implementation, impacts, and outcomes of practices, programs, and policies, and makes recommendations for improvement. B. SWRK 604 Ethical Issues in Contemporary Social Work Ethical Reasoning Regarding Ethical Dilemmas in Your Agency: Benchmark C. SWRK 616 Advanced Generalist Practice II Presentation of Macro-Level Dilemmas on Values/Ethics: Benchmark B. B. SWRK 616 Advanced Generalist Practice II Presentation of Macro-Level Dilemmas on Values/Ethics: Benchmark B. SWRK 601 Advanced Generalist Practice I Process Recording: Benchmark C. SWRK 616 Advanced General Practice II - Presentation of Ethical Responsibility to Assist the Client: Benchmark pt scale) Benchmark Score 88% B. Advanced Generalist Practice II Case analysis of Community services. Benchmark Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 10 N=27 89% met benchmark Paper aggregate grade Presentation aggregate grade N=13 Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 11 N=27 75% met benchmark Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 12 N=27 Presentation aggregate grade N=13 Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 13 N=27 75% met benchmark Process recording aggregate grade Presentation aggregate grade N=13 Field Evaluation Section 10, Behavior 14 N=27 70% met benchmark Case analysis aggregate grade