LIFT Logical Framework ( )

Transcription

1 LIFT Logical Framework (-) Last updated: 8 January LEVEL PURPOSE: To improve the incomes and nutrition status of poor people in Myanmar by promoting resilient livelihoods and food security PO 1: Increased incomes of rural households PO 1.1: Number of LIFT households with increased income (by sex of HH PO 1.2: % of households in LIFT villages below the poverty line (by 138,000 hhs 217,234 hhs 305,076 hhs 364,119 hhs 30 % 28 % 21 % 15 % PO 2.1: Number of LIFT households with increased asset ownership score 50,217 hhs 79,125 hhs 110,065 hhs 125,716 hhs PO 2: Increased resilience of rural households and communities to shocks, stresses and adverse trends PO 2.2: Number of LIFT households with increased income diversity score PO 2.3: Number of people whose resilience has been improved and ability to cope has increased (by sex) 0 hhs 14,872 hhs 33,017 hhs 44,438 hhs 788,294 people 1,135,424 people 1,515,434 people 1,766,394 people PO 3.1 Number of LIFT households with an acceptable food diversity score 97,000 hhs 115,257 hhs 134,691 hhs 147,721 hhs PO 3: Improved nutrition of women PO 3.2: Number of LIFT households with an increase in food security by at least one month (by sex of HH 252,000 hhs 329,663 hhs 415,933 hhs 474,190 hhs Page 1

2 Improved nutrition of women and children. PO 3.3: % of moderately/ severely stunted children under 5 years of age in LIFT villages (by sex and age group) 33 % 32 % 31 % 30 % PO 3.4: Proportion of children under 5 with diarrhoea in the previous 2 weeks (by sex and age group) 15 % 14 % 13 % 12 % PO 4: Improved policies and effective public expenditure for pro-poor development PO 4.1: Number and type of public sector/rural development policy influenced by LIFT PO 4.2: Number and type of changes in public sector/rural development budget allocation and spending influenced by LIFT Pr 1: Increased sustainable agriculture and farm-based production by smallholder farmers Pr 1.1: Number of LIFT households reached by advisory services (by sex of HH Pr 1.2: Number of LIFT households who trial and/or adopt improved practices, inputs and technologies Pr 1.3: Number of LIFT households with an increase in production crops only 80,617 hhs 119,500 hhs 176,730 hhs 220,909 hhs 87,819 hhs 128,707 hhs 178,914 hhs 218,126 hhs 133,000 hhs 169,286 hhs 216,721 hhs 251,011 hhs Pr 2.1: Number of LIFT households who are members of functional producer groups 38,709 hhs 54,327 hhs 72,284 hhs 83,203 hhs Page 2

3 Pr 2: Improved market access and market terms for smallholder farmers Pr 2.2 Number of LIFT households adopting new marketing practices (by 0 hhs 6,473 hhs 13,046 hhs 17,232 hhs Pr 2.3: Number of LIFT households securing higher returns (profit) from agriculture/livestock/fishery activties 0 hhs 45,282 hhs 107,915 hhs 148,104 hhs Pr 3: Increased and safe employment in non-farm activities for smallholders and landless Pr 3.1: Number of LIFT households supported in non-agricultural skills development Pr 3.2: Number of trained people who establish their own enterprises or become employed (by sex) Pr 3.3: Number of LIFT households with an increase in income from nonagricultural activities (by sex of HH 13,486 hhs 31,569 hhs 53,236 hhs 65,286 hhs 71,219 hhs 72,920 hhs 88,087 hhs 96,522 hhs 17,928 hhs 29,321 hhs 42,971 hhs 50,563 hhs Pr 4.1: Number of LIFT MFIs financially self-sustaining 2 MFIs 2 MFIs 10 MFIs 14 MFIs Pr 4: Increased access to adequate and affordable financial services by smallholders and landless Pr 4.2: Number of LIFT households with access to financial services (by Pr 4.3: Number of LIFT households accessing financial services by purpose 574,746 hhs 890,856 hhs 1,149,492 hhs 1,436,865 hhs 272,000 hhs 472,016 hhs 672,033 hhs 772,041 hhs Page 3

4 Pr 5.1: Number of LIFT households reached with nutritionally sensitive information 42,394 hhs 60,692 hhs 116,747 hhs 160,767 hhs Pr 5.2: Number of men/women in LIFT households with awareness of nutritional needs of women and children in the community (by sex of HH n/a 59,543 people 139,862 people 188,596 people Pr 5: Improved nutrition, sanitation and hygeine practices Pr 5.3: Number of children 6-23 months with acceptable dietary diversity (by sex) Pr 5.4: Number of infants (0-5 months of age) who received only breast milk during the previous 24 hours (by sex) Pr 5.5: Number of LIFT households using an improved sanitation facility 800 children 18,144 children 35,787 children 59,909 children 800 children 29,363 children 61,756 children 84,138 children 0 hhs 21,248 hhs 42,495 hhs 51,119 hhs Pr 5.6: Number of LIFT households using protected water source (by sex of HH 114,602 hhs 158,750 hhs 210,505 hhs 260,192 hhs Page 4

5 Pr 6: Safeguarded access to and sustainable use of natural resources for smallholders and landless Pr 6.1: Number of LIFT villages where common property resource management is taken up (by type) Pr 6.2: Number of LIFT households benefitting (directly/indirectly) from protected/managed natural resources (by type) 244 villages 403 villages 662 villages 822 villages 0 hhs 4,583 hhs 18,806 hhs 27,221 hhs Pr 7: Strengthened local capacity of communities, local government, CSOs and private enterprises to support and promote food and livelihood security Pr 7.1: % of LIFT funds managed by national entities Pr 7.2: Number and type of local groups and institutions supported to promote food and livelihood security Pr 7.3: Number and type of supported local groups and institutions actively promoting food and livelihood security To be determined 180 local groups 381 local groups 588 local groups 637 local groups 0 local groups 175 local groups 374 local groups 423 local groups Pr 8: Generation of policy-relevant evidence regarding pro-poor development Pr 8.1: Number of LIFT-supported policy oriented events organised Pr 8.2: Number of LIFT policyoriented publications published and disseminated to stakeholders 26 events 29 events 42 events 54 events 0 publications 8 publications 15 publications 29 publications Page 5