Additional Cofinancing

Transcription

1 Additional Cofinancing Sri Lanka Project Number: Loan/Grant Number: 2455/0116-CAM August 2012 Proposed Administration of Grant Kingdom of Cambodia: Emergency Food Assistance Project (Cofinanced by the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program)

2 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 August 2012) Currency unit riel (KR) KR1.00 = $ $1.00 = KR4,085 ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank ADF Asian Development Fund CFW cash for work CPMU Central Project Management Unit GAFSP Global Agriculture and Food Security Program NGO nongovernment organization PPMU provincial project management unit NOTE In this report, "$" refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated. Vice-President S. Groff (Operations 2) Director General K. Senga, Southeast Asia Department (SERD) Director P. Brimble, Officer-in-Charge, Cambodia Resident Mission (CARM), SERD Team leader Team members Peer reviewers N. Ikemoto, Senior Natural Resources Specialist, Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture Division, SERD C. Chea, Gender Specialist, CARM E. Gagnon, Senior Procurement Specialist, Central Operations Services Office S. Hung, Senior Social Development Specialist, Regional and Sustainable Development Department (RSDD) B. Konysbayev, Senior Counsel, Office of the General Counsel P. Long, Senior Implementation Specialist, CARM (co-team leader) C. Ramiro, Senior Operations Assistant, SERD S. Sokunthea, Senior Procurement Specialist, CARM P. Song, Operations Assistant, CARM S. Sophana, Project Analyst, CARM N. Britton, Principal Disaster Risk Management Specialist, RSDD M. Katagami, Senior Natural Resources and Agriculture Specialist, RSDD In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

3 CONTENTS PROJECT AT A GLANCE Page I. THE ONGOING PROJECT 1 II. THE ADDITIONAL FINANCING 1 A. Rationale 1 B. Impact, Outcome, and Outputs 2 C. Cofinancing 3 D. Staff Views 4 III. THE PRESIDENT'S RECOMMENDATION 4 APPENDIX Revised Design and Monitoring Framework 5 SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIXES (available upon request) 1. Grant Agreement 2. Cambodia Global Agriculture and Food Security Program 3. Project Administration Manual 4. Design and Monitoring Framework (Additional Cofinancing Scope) 5. Summary of Project Performance 6. Contribution to the ADB Results Framework 7. Summary Poverty Reduction and Social Strategy 8. Gender Action Plan 9. Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan 10. Economic and Financial Analysis

4 PROJECT AT A GLANCE 1. Project Name: Additional cofinancing for Emergency Food Assistance Project 2. Project Number: Country: Cambodia 4. Department/Division: Southeast Asia Department/Cambodia Resident Mission 5. Sector Classification: Sectors Primary Subsectors Agriculture and natural resources Agriculture and rural sector development Agricultural production and markets 6. Thematic Classification: Themes Primary Subthemes Economic growth Developing rural areas Social development Other vulnerable groups 6a. Climate Change Impact 6b. Gender Mainstreaming No climate change indicator available Gender equity theme (GEN) 7. Targeting Classification: General Intervention Geographic dimensions of inclusive growth 9. Project Risk Categorization: Low Targeted Intervention Millennium Development Goals Income poverty at household level Effective gender mainstreaming (EGM) Some gender benefits (SGB) No gender elements (NGE) 8. Location Impact: National Rural Medium High 10. Safeguards Categorization: 11. ADB Financing: Environment Involuntary resettlement Indigenous peoples No ADB financing available C C C 12. Cofinancing: 13. Counterpart Financing: 14. Aid Effectiveness: Administration Financier Category Amount ($ Million) Type Global Agriculture and Food Official-Grant 24.5 Full Security Program Total 24.5 Source Amount ($ Million) Government 3.3 Total 3.3 Parallel project implementation unit Program-based approach Yes No

5 I. THE ONGOING PROJECT 1. On 2 October 2008, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved the Emergency Food Assistance Project with a $17.5 million grant and SDR million loan financing. 1 The project was designed to improve the immediate food security of approximately 500,000 poor and vulnerable people affected by high food prices. This would be achieved through (i) compensatory consumption support, (ii) productivity enhancement support, and (iii) capacity development for emergency response to food crisis and project management. The Ministry of Economy and Finance is the executing agency, and the central project management unit (CPMU) set up within the Ministry of Economy and Finance has been implementing the project. A major change in scope was approved in June 2009 to adjust the original design to address increased vulnerability due to the global economic crisis. 2 A 1-year extension of project closing date was approved in September Under the project, a series of time-bound interventions have been implemented without any major delays. The last review mission (25 November 7 December 2011) reported that the project exceeded the original targets and the intended outputs and outcome have been successfully achieved. 3 II. THE ADDITIONAL FINANCING A. Rationale 2. The project is performing well based on the criteria in ADB s Additional Financing Policy: 4 (i) the strong capacity of the Ministry of Economy and Finance to coordinate and implement multisector interventions and achieve the intended outputs and outcome without any major delay; (ii) good contract awards and disbursement records against projections; (iii) compliance with covenants including safeguards; and (iv) successful management of risks by (a) partnering with the private sector to use the established storage and distribution system, (b) distributing agricultural inputs in a transparent and participatory manner, and (c) empowering the community to carry out supervision, monitoring, and implementation of food-for-work and cash-for-work (CFW) schemes. 3. While the intention was to provide one-off emergency countermeasures under the project, the original scope has evolved based on lessons learned and implementation needs to include interventions that address structural constraints faced by many poor smallholders that cause low productivity. In particular, a CFW scheme, including a small-scale civil works contract, was introduced as a result of the major change to complement machine-based works with labor-based soil works to improve tertiary canals and roads for increased production and market access. Quality seed production was introduced based on the recommendation of the midterm project review in July 2010 and through minor change in scope approved on 20 September 2010 to sustain increases in rice yields (40% 47% on average). 5 Quality seed production and sales at affordable prices increased local availability to poor smallholders, which 1 ADB Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors for the Proposed Loan and Asian Development Fund Grant to the Kingdom of Cambodia for the Emergency Food Assistance Project. Manila. 2 The major changes included (i) increased budget for compensatory support by reallocating $5 million from Component 2 to Component 1, allowing (a) cash as a means of compensation (cash for work) and (b) including a civil works contract; and (iii) cancellation of SDR3.52 million Asian Development Fund loan originally allocated for Component 2. Thus, the project has a total revised cost of $33.56 million. 3 The summary of the project performance is in Supplementary Appendix 5. 4 ADB Additional Financing: Enhancing Development Effectiveness. Manila 5 Rice yield generally declines drastically after the third year if the same seeds are used year after year. To enable continued access to quality seeds by the project beneficiary farmers, the minor change in scope was approved to provide facilities and operational support to the existing research stations to increase their quality seed production.

6 2 in turn is creating demand for quality seeds and contributing to the development of quality seed production. 4. Formulation of the recommendations for the emergency food reserve system was an original output of the project. The recommendations were endorsed by the National Food Security Task Force in June 2011 and the prime minister in July 2011, and the project was extended by 1 year to draft a subdecree, agreements, and standard operating procedures and to carry out consultations for the establishment of the Cambodia Food Reserve System using the grant savings. The finalized subdecree will be submitted for legal approval and is expected to be approved by the prime minister in August The Cambodia Food Reserve System is one of the government's efforts to develop a long-term mechanism to build resilience at the country and household levels to minimize food insecurity, avoid negative coping strategies, and maintain farm production. 5. The Global Agriculture and Food Security Program (GAFSP) approved a provisional allocation of $39.1 million to Cambodia. 6 ADB participates in the GAFSP as a supervising entity. 7 The government, GAFSP Steering Committee, and ADB agreed to utilize an allocation of $24.5 million from the GAFSP as additional financing to the project to implement the Cambodia GAFSP components 1 (Raising Agricultural Productivity) and 3 (Reducing Risk and Vulnerability). This would (i) improve synergies and maximize the development impacts, (ii) avoid duplication and the risk of exceeding the absorptive capacity of the institutions in charge of agriculture and food security investments, and (iii) utilize the existing implementation structure to realize faster disbursement. B. Impact, Outcome, and Outputs 6. The proposed additional financing is consistent with ADB's country partnership strategy To accommodate the proposed additional financing, a change in scope of the project is proposed to: (i) increase the CFW, quality seeds and fertilizer distribution with training, and quality seed production in the new target communes and add six new provinces (for a total of 10 target provinces); 9 (ii) continue strengthening the capacity and information and data management system supporting food security at the national and provincial levels; (iii) include new activities focusing on nutrition and diversified livelihood; 10 and (iv) modify indicators for outputs, outcome, and impact. The remaining short-term emergency measures under the project do not require additional financing. The intended impact is reduced vulnerability of households that lack food security in the target provinces. 7. The original outcome has been modified to ensure improved access to sufficient and nutritious food by households that lack food security in the target provinces. The expected outputs are (i) increased availability and awareness of nutritious food and hygiene through (a) a 6 The GAFSP is a multilateral mechanism; Cambodia is one of the eligible countries. ADB became the supervising entity in June 2011 (footnote 6). 7 ADB Global Agriculture and Food Security Program: Proposed Participation by the Asian Development Bank as a Supervising Entity. Manila. 8 ADB Country Partnership Strategy: Cambodia, Manila 9 The 10 GAFSP provinces comprise four existing provinces (Banteay Meanchey, Kampong Thom, Otdar Meanchay, and Siem Reap) and six new provinces (Kampong Cham, Kampong Speu, Prey Veng, Preah Vihear Svay Rieng, and Takeo). 10 Nutrition and diversified livelihood activities that include livestock and aquaculture, hygiene awareness, and disaster preparedness and mitigation in agriculture are activities included in the Cambodia GAFSP but are not included in the Emergency Food Assistance Project.

7 3 cash for work program (including civil works contract), (b) food use and nutrition training for women and children, (c) home gardening, and (d) basic health, hygiene, and sanitation training; (ii) increased access to improved agricultural inputs and technologies through (a) quality seed and fertilizer distribution, (b) quality seed production, (c) diversified livelihood (livestock and aquaculture), and (d) emergency preparedness and mitigation in agriculture; (iii) improved capacity to mainstream food security through (a) an improved food security and nutrition monitoring and evaluation system, and (b) improved institutional coordination supporting food security at the national and provincial levels; and (iv) effective project implementation and management. The implementation period is 1 October 2012 to 31 December The project s overall implementation period will be more than 48 months. The revised design and monitoring framework is in Appendix 1. C. Cofinancing 8. The cost of the modified project scope is estimated at $27.73 million. The government requested ADB to administer an additional cofinanced grant of $24.5 million from the GAFSP (Tables 1 2). The overall project cost (including the modified scope) is estimated at $61.29 million, out of which the original project cost after major change in scope is $33.56 million (comprising Asian Development Fund [ADF] loan of $11.67 million equivalent, ADF grant of $17.50 million, and counterpart funds of $4.39 million). The government will provide an estimated $3.23 million as counterpart funds to finance taxes and duties, and operating costs. The ADB loan will cover a part of the recurrent costs. Table 1: Revised Investment Plan Current Allocation Amount Additional Financing Item Total A. Base Cost a 1 Compensatory Consumption Support Productivity Enhancement Support Capacity Development for Food Security Project Management Subtotal (A) B. Contingencies b C. Interest During Implementation c Total (A+B+C): a The four components listed under the base cost have been revised to include four outputs listed in para. 7. b For additional financing, physical contingencies are computed at 2.5% of the total cost and price contingencies are computed at 1.5% of the total base cost. c Interest during implementation has been computed at 1% per annum on the emergency loan amount. Source: ADB estimates. Table 2: Revised Financing Plan Current Loan and Grant Financing Additional Financing Total Share of Share of Actual Amount a ($ million) Total (%) Amount ($ million) Total (%) Amount a ($ million) Share of Total (%) Source ADF loan ADF grant Government GAFSP Total ADF = Asian Development Fund, GAFSP = Global Agriculture and Food Security Program. a As of July Source: ADB estimates.

8 4 9. The additional financing will continue to target households classified as poor level 1 and 2 according to the Identification of Poor Household Program, a national targeting mechanism developed by the Ministry of Planning. The additional financing will continue to adopt the participatory and transparent approaches and procedures. The CFW guidelines have been revised to increase women s participation in the project committee. Open village meetings and an independent monitor (a nongovernment organization [NGO]) will be retained to ensure a transparent and participatory implementation process. A new scope for nutrition and livelihood activities will be implemented through engagement of an umbrella NGO (or a firm) to engage local NGOs with close collaboration with relevant line ministries and their local agencies. To ensure continuity and avoid implementation delay, ADB will continue to recruit individual consultants and an independent monitor, while the Ministry of Economy and Finance will engage the umbrella NGO or firm for nutrition and livelihood activities to ensure close coordination with the CPMU, implementing agencies, and provincial project management units (PPMUs). All procurement will be carried out in accordance with ADB s Procurement Guidelines (2010, as amended from time to time). 10. The existing implementation arrangements for the project will be retained with minor adjustments at the province level. The CPMU within the Ministry of Economy and Finance will continue its execution responsibility. The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries; Ministry of Rural Development; Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology; Ministry of Women s Affairs; Ministry of Commerce; National Committee for Disaster Management; and Council for Agriculture and Rural Development are the implementing agencies. There will be 10 PPMUs the existing four PPMUs in Banteay Meanchey, Kampong Thom, Otdar Meanchey, and, Siem Reap provinces will continue their operations, while new PPMUs will be set up in each of the six new provinces. To expedite implementation, advance contracting will be used. D. Staff Views 11. Staff supports the proposed additional financing because it will build on prior experiences to (i) improve resilience in agriculture at the household level (high poverty and malnutrition in the target areas), (ii) demonstrate effective partnerships with civil society by upscaling ongoing nutrition and community-based livelihood interventions, and (iii) demonstrate effective gender mainstreaming by specifying staff responsibility and collecting and analyzing sex-disaggregated data in a structured way. The additional financing has strong government ownership as the counterpart allocation has increased from $1.83 million for the whole GAFSP proposal to $3.23 million for this additional financing part alone. Prior to Board approval, advance contracting actions are ongoing to set up PPMUs and complete the procurement of vehicles and recruitment of consulting services. 12. The proposed additional financing has been reviewed and supported by the Central Operations Services Office, the Controller s Department, the Office of Cofinancing Operations, the Office of the General Counsel, and the Regional Sustainable Development Department. III. THE PRESIDENT'S RECOMMENDATION 13. The President recommends that the Board approve ADB administering a grant not exceeding the equivalent of $24,500,000 to the Kingdom of Cambodia for the additional financing of the Emergency Food Assistance Project to be provided by the Global Agriculture and Food Security Program.

9 Design Summary (Current Project) Impact Design Summary REVISED DESIGN AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines (current project) Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines (Overall project) Data Sources and Reporting Mechanisms Assumptions and Risks Assumptions Reduced vulnerability of foodinsecure households in the target provinces (unchanged) Target beneficiary households not falling below food poverty line ($0.42 per capita per day) Increased local supply and household reserve of food The number of foodinsecure households (including food-insecure households headed by women) in the target provinces is reduced by 10% through: Increase in income of target beneficiary households by 10% Increased local supply and household reserve of food for at least 3 months of consumption (changed) Reports of the NIS Provincial and district statistics covering economic activities and poverty status Project baseline and periodic survey and monitoring data End-line survey Macroeconomic and political stability Government commitment to rural development focusing on inclusive growth and poverty reduction Risks Lack of coherent strategies and policies in addressing food security Lack of transparency in the management of public resources Outcome Improved access to sufficient food by food-insecure households in the target provinces Improved access to sufficient and nutritious food by food-insecure households (changed) National emergency food security and response system prepared and adopted (achieved) Operational national food security response system 10% yield increase of rice by target farmers in the project provinces from the pre-crisis level by 2010 (achieved) FSN Monitoring & Evaluation system with MIS improved and quarterly bulletin on F SN produce (changed) Subdecree, SOP, and relevant agreements on food (including seed) reserve system Progress reports FSN Quarterly Bulletin produced and disseminated by CARD End-line survey mirroring methods and coverage of baseline survey Assumptions Effective institutional support and coordination by CARD, NCDM, PCDM, and relevant line ministries (e.g., MAFF, MRD, MOWRAM, MOH. and MOWA) Target beneficiaries willing to adopt new technology or knowledge Target households have access to quality food products Appendix 1 5

10 Design Summary (Current Project) Design Summary Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines (current project) Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines (Overall project) xx 1 % decrease in malnourished children under 5 years old (disaggregated by gender, consistent with selected CDHSs and CNIP nutrition indicators) (added) (Baseline survey in 2012) xx 2 % increase in beneficiaries practicing improved hygiene and sanitation practices (added) (Baseline survey in 2012) Data Sources and Reporting Mechanisms Annual/periodic reports and bulletins of executing agency, MAFF, CARD, NCDM, MOH, MOWA, and umbrella NGO Periodic survey of beneficiaries in the project provinces Assumptions and Risks Risks Inadequate storage and distribution system for fertilizer and seeds Occurrence of natural disaster, e.g., flood, drought, or serious disease or pest infestation, if any 6 Appendix 1 10% decrease in foodinsecure households (including households headed by women) reporting lack of food months (added) (Baseline survey in 2012 ) Periodic survey of beneficiaries in the project provinces At least 20% yield increase of rice by target beneficiary households in the project provinces from the 2012 level (added) (Baseline survey in 2012) End-line survey mirroring methods and coverage of baseline survey 1 The baseline survey available in December 2012 will determine the feasible quantitative target. 2 The baseline survey available in December 2012 will determine the feasible quantitative target.

11 Design Summary (Current Project) Outputs 1. Increased availability of food for vulnerable households Design Summary 1. Increased availability and awareness of nutritious food and hygiene among foodinsecure households (changed) Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines (current project) 113,000 households reached through food distribution and food-forwork program (achieved) Rice consumption needs of 3 4 months for the target population are met (achieved) 2 million labor days exchanged and claimed for food/cash under the foodfor-work scheme (achieved) Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines (Overall project) 1 million labor days exchanged and claimed for cash under the CFW scheme by 2014 (added) 300 kilometers of tertiary roads and 500 hectares of irrigation potential created by 2014 added) At least 30% female representation in project committees and 20,000 female beneficiaries as participants in CFW projects (added) Data Sources and Reporting Mechanisms Progress reports of the provincial coordination offices in each project province Periodic reports and final report of executing agency, MRD, MOWRAM, and MAFF Progress reports of the provincial coordination offices in each project province Periodic reports and final report of executing agency, MRD, MOWRAM, MOWA, and umbrella NGO End-line survey mirroring methods and coverage of baseline survey Assumptions and Risks Assumptions Availability of competent national and local NGOs to deliver health and nutrition interventions Target female beneficiaries willing to take a leadership role as envisaged Risks Disproportionate allocation of households resources towards food Availability of alternative employment opportunities At least 50% of target beneficiary households (children and women) received training and provisions on home gardening, nutrition, basic health, hygiene, and sanitation (disaggregated by gender) (added) Appendix 1 7

12 Design Summary (Current Project) 2. Support the input needs of smallholders and marginal farmers Design Summary 2. Increased access to improved agricultural inputs and technologies among food-insecure farmers and women (changed) Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines (current project) 70,000 farmers are provided with fertilizer, rice seeds, and extension services (achieved) 1350 tons of quality rice seeds and 46 tons of quality vegetable seeds produced (achieved) Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines (Overall project) 40,000 target beneficiary households (including 20,000 female beneficiaries) adopt highyielding inputs and technologies (added) 1,250 tons of quality rice seeds and 50 tons of vegetable and other crops seed produced (added) At least 50% of target beneficiary households received training and provisions on fish, livestock and crops (added) 400 existing and/or established SHGs transformed to farmer organizations (with 50% female members and 30% female management) and trained on community projects for disaster preparedness and mitigation in agriculture (added) Data Sources and Reporting Mechanisms Quarterly progress reports Pre and post survey reports Progress reports of the provincial coordination offices in each Project province Periodic reports and final report of MAFF, umbrella NGO, and executing agency 200 farmer organizations registered by end of year 1 and all (400 farmer organizations) registered at the end of the project End-line survey mirroring methods and coverage of baseline survey Assumptions and Risks Assumptions Seeds and fertilizer can be readily procured from local sources or produced in the project provinces Target beneficiaries willing to adopt new technology or knowledge Risks Delay in delivery of fertilizer and seeds by suppliers Inability of beneficiaries to repay credit for quality seeds and fertilizers within the project time frame (from crop-failure, low yield, etc.) Occurrence of natural disaster (flood or drought) or serious disease or pest infestation, if any, affecting supply or production of inputs 8 Appendix 1

13 Design Summary (Current Project) 3. Capacity development for food crisis and project management Design Summary 3. Improved capacity to mainstream food security (changed) Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines (current project) A consolidated national framework and an implementation system to handle food security is prepared (achieved) Performance Targets and Indicators with Baselines (Overall project) One workshop per year is conducted to promote FSN program formulation and use of FSN information (with a minimum of 25% female participation) (added) Data Sources and Reporting Mechanisms Final report and recommendations therein adopted by National Food Security Task Forth and prime minister Reports of NCDM, CARD, and executing agency Quarterly progress reports Assumptions and Risks Assumption Commitment of executing agency and implementing agencies to effective staff capacity building activities Risk Staff retention ratio after capacity building activities 4. Project management strengthened (separated) Number of trainings provided at the national and subnational level (with a minimum of 25% female participation) (added) Number and types of training on project management and implementation (including project M&E and reporting, sensitization to GAP) (added) Quarterly progress reports Activities with Milestones 1. Increased availability and awareness of nutritious food and hygiene among food-insecure households 1.1. Identify target beneficiaries for cash-for-work program by end of September 2012 and target beneficiary households, SHGs, and farmer organizations for livelihood activities, food use, nutrition and basic health care, and sanitation trainings, by end of December Implement and supervise cash-for-work program including civil work contracts, continuously throughout the project period 1.3. Select and contract an umbrella NGO for delivery of health and nutrition and livelihood interventions through national and local NGOs, by end of September Capacity building/training to selected target beneficiaries, by end of April Socioeconomic and nutrition baseline survey among target beneficiary households in the 10 target provinces, by end of December 2012 Inputs (Additional financing) ADB/GAFSP: $ million Government: $3.23 million Item Amount ($ million) ADB/GAFSP Materials: $18.90 million Equipment and vehicles: $0.19 million Consulting services: $3.00 million Recurrent cost: $1.29 million Contingencies: $1.12 million Appendix 1 9

14 2. Increased access to improved agricultural inputs and technologies among food-insecure farmers and women 2.1. Identify target beneficiary households, by end of October Procure/produce, transport, and store seeds and fertilizer at the beginning of production season, from November 2012 to the end of project period 2.3. Contract a microfinance institution to collect payments, by end of October Sell seed and fertilizer at affordable prices to target beneficiary households at the beginning of production season, from November 2012 to the end of project period 2.5. Identify improved pro-poor and pro-women technologies, by end of March Deliver livelihoods interventions, by end of September Identify SHGs and farmer organizations and their capacity building, by end of April Transform SHGs to farmer organizations, by end of project period 3. Improved capacity to mainstream food security 3.1. Provide training to operationalize FSN M&E system with MIS at national and provincial levels, by the end of December 2012 and continuously throughout the project period 3.2. Strengthen coordination between and among line ministries and with other stakeholders at national and provincial levels to mainstream food security 4. Project management strengthened 4.1 Establish PPMUs and carry out disbursement training 4.2 Procure vehicles, motorcycles, and office equipment for new PPMUs 4.3 Recruit individual consultants, independent monitor, and umbrella NGO/firm 4.4 Recruit a firm/ngo to conduct baseline survey 4.5 Establish an independent monitoring system to oversee target beneficiary households selection, distribution of inputs, and compliance with fiduciary requirements, by end of September Strengthen project management and monitoring capacity of the executing agency and implementing agencies through on-the-job training and workshops throughout the project period Government: Item Amount ($ million) Government of Cambodia: Recurrent cost: $1.10 million Investment cost: $0.39.million In-kind (taxes and duties): $1.74 million CARD = Council for Agricultural and Rural Development; CDHS = Cambodia health and demographic survey; CFW = cash-for-work; CNIP = Cambodia Nutrition Investment Plan; FSN = food security and nutrition; GAP = gender action plan; MAFF = Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; MIS = management information system; MOH = Ministry of Health; MOWA = Ministry of Women Affairs; MOWRAM = Ministry of Water Resources and Meteorology; MRD = Ministry of Rural Development; NCDM = National Committee for Disaster Management; NGO = nongovernment organization; NIS = National Institute of Statistics; PCDM = provincial committee for disaster management; PPMU = Provincial Project Management Unit; SHG = self-help group; SOP = Standard Operating Procedures 10 Appendix 1