DARFUR FOOD SECURITY MONITORING

Transcription

1 DARFUR FOOD SECURITY MONITORING WEST DARFUR ROUND 6 May 2010 Highlights The sixth round was carried out at the beginning of the lean season when household food stocks are thought to be depleted and market prices are high. Despite the above conditions, an improved food security situation among mixed communities and IDPs an was reported compared with last round in February 2010, with a significant improvement among the resident communities. Compared to May 2009 there are positive trends for all communities, moving from the moderately food insecure group to the food secure group. The reasons for this is believed to be improved income levels and relatively stable cost of living. The cost of the minimum healthy food basket has increased slightly (14 percent) compared to February 2010 and May This is mainly attributed to the increase in prices of sugar, dry tomatoes and cereals. Population movements occurred during the month due to intertribal conflict in Zalingi and Mukjar. Coping strategies remain stable compared to the same time last year. This implicates that the majority of households do not face food/money shortages and thus have not adopted any coping strategies. Food Security Situation Compared to May 2009, the food security situation shows a positive trend for all communities as more households have moved from moderately food insecure to food secure. Similar to the last round, IDPs remain the most food insecure with 40 percent of the households being moderately food insecure. The overall food security situation is thus stable and acceptable for all three population groups, with a significant improvement for resident communities compared to February By location, the mean food consumption and expenditure composite indicator in May 2010 shows that all locations have a score above the lower threshold (severe), with all but four locations having a mean above the highest threshold. Mukjar, Fubaranga IDPs, Delei and Kandobi are within the moderately food insecure 10 6 Food security, by community type 73% 74% 81% 44% 54% 6 59% 51% 58% 62% 41% 38% 33% 35% 22% 24% 5% 5% 2% 5% 2% 4% 1% 6% 19% IDP camps M ixed communities Resident communities Round 2 (May Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (May thresholds. The food security situation in locations such as Dorti camp, Dorti Falata, Furbaranga residents, Um shalaya and Morni camp has significantly improved compared to the last round and May However, the situation in Furbaranga IDP camp has significantly deteriorated compared to the last round but remained similar to May METHODOLOGY Purposively selected sentinel sites covering IDPs in camps, residents and mixed communities. Complemented with market price monitoring and seasonal metrological and agricultural information. 575 households were surveyed. Replacement sites are used when insecurity prevents visits to original site. Dietary Diversity and Consumption Score: Using a 7-day recall period, information was collected on the variety and frequency of different foods and food groups to calculate a weighted household food consumption score. Weights are based on the nutritional density of the foods. Households are classified as having either poor, borderline or good consumption based on the analysis of the data. The Food Security Indicator is a composite score that combines values for food consumption, relative expenditure and absolute expenditure. The lower thresholds is 15.4 while upper one is The Coping Strategy Index is classified into four categories: 0=no coping, 1-5=low coping; 6-10 medium coping; and 11>= high coping. These findings are not representative for the State but only for the targeted locations due to the sampling method. 1

2 Market Situation The cost of the minimum healthy food basket in May 2010 has increased slightly (14 percent) from 0.94 SDG in February 2010 to 1.07 SDG per person per day in May. This is a result of high prices of sorghum, sugar, dry tomatoes and onions. Cereal prices, as expected to further increase during the lean season, are at an upward trend (20 percent in excess for sorghum and 7percnet in excess for millet) compared to the last round, while sorghum prices are 56 percent higher than same time last year. The poor harvest of the last rainy season had a negative impact on food prices, as household food stocks are expected to be depleted earlier than normal this year. The Terms of Trade (TOT) of a goat (number of sorghum bags for one goat) has slightly decreased compared to last round in February 2010 and to the five year average. This is due to the poor harvest of the last rainy season which has resulted in higher cereal prices and reduced livestock prices since the beginning of this year. SDG/ 90 kg sack Sorghum Prices in Geneina Market kg sack Sorghum Sacks Purchased Per Male Goat Sold in Geneina Market J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D 5 yr average Year 2009 Year yr average Year 2009 Year 2010 Agriculture The relatively improved security situation in West Darfur since the beginning of 2009, with exception of a few locations, has had a positive impact on the increased areas being prepared for cultivation in the 2009/2010 rainy season compared to the 2008/2009. Last season s poor harvest and consequently higher cereal prices have encouraged people to increase the area of cultivation in the coming season, and a high proportion of households from IDP camps, resident and mixed communities will either have better or the same access to land as last season. However, some 12 percent on average report having a problem with access this season and will plant less area that last season. The main source of seeds for the three population groups is mainly the markets. Production of seeds is lower than last year and this is attributed to the relatively poor harvest. Donations by NGOs/UN/Ministry of Agricultures is the only source for few to obtain their seeds this year. Land access this season compared to last season 6 47% 49% 42% 55% 29% 13% 9% Better Same Worse Better Same Worse Better Same 16% Worse % Main source of seeds 82% 5 29% 21% 13% 7 9% IDP camps Mixed communities Resident communities IDP camps M ixed communities Resident communities 2

3 Income Sources This section shows the importance of different income sources by presenting how much each of them contributes to the total household income. Wage labour (agricultural, domestic etc.) and business (kiosk, tea selling etc.) are important for all community types; firewood and charcoal collection is important to camp and mixed communities; and sale of crops is important to mixed and resident communities. More specifically, 38 percent of the income of IDP households are from wage labour activities, 22 percent from firewood and charcoal collection, 19 percent from business and 7 percent from crop production (representing areas where some households have access to wadi cultivation). Mixed communities receive a greater proportion of their income from business (24 percent). In addition, 24 percent of income is generated from wage labour, 14 percent from sale of cultivated crops and 11 percent from firewood/charcoal collection. For resident communities 33 percent of income comes from wage labour, 19 percent from business, 17 percent from sale of crops and 5 percent from firewood and charcoal collection. Livestock, donations and sale of food aid contribute very little to households income. Expenditure (income proxy) and purchasing power The total proportion of expenditure spent on food has slightly increased compared to the last round from 61 to 62 percent. This is attributed to the increase of cost of the minimum healthy food basket. The majority of the expenditure on food was on cereal 15 percent, dry tomatoes 12 percent, meat 10 percent and sugar 9 percent. The proportion of expenditure on non-food items is 7 percent on health care, 5 percent on construction, 4 percent on clothing and debts and 3 percent on milling costs. The income level has improved showing a significant increase in the mean income proxy (SDG/person/day) compared to February 2010 as well as May 2009 for Dorti camp, Dorti Falata, Mornei camp, Forbaranga residents and House rent, Transport, 2% Other, 4% M illing, 3% Construction, 5% Debts, 4% Social events, Food, 62% 3% Firewood, 4% Animal feed, Clothing, 2% 4% Education, Health, 7% Breakdown of household expenditures Cereals, 15% Oil, 6% M eat, 1 Pulses, 2% Sugar, 9% Dairy, Dry 2% vegetables, Cooked food, 12% Other 1% food items, 5% Beida. There is also a slight increase reported in UM dokhon, Mukjar and Garsila camps compared to February but similar to May Access to wadi cultivation might have an impact on the income increment particularly for locations where a significant improvement was observed. Purchasing power has consequently improved and more households can afford the minimum food basket. In May 2009, as many as 58 percent of the IDPs could not afford the basket while this has now been reduced to 15 percent. Also, the other community groups have improved but not significantly. Proportion of households 6 Income proxy by community type compared with cost of food basket 58% 64% 73% 43% 46% 36% 42 45% % 25% 33% 39% 29 21% 15% 23 12% 14% 14% 21 6% IDP camps M ixed communities Resident communities Round 2 (May Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (May 3

4 Food Consumption and Sources Resident communities have the highest proportion (99 percent) of households in the acceptable food consumption category among the three population groups. Among IDPs, 92 percent have an acceptable food consumption iwhich is significantly compared to the last round and the last year. Mixed communities have fewer households in the acceptable category than last round, while their consumption is stable compared to May It is notable that none of the population groups have households in the poor consumption category. Food assistance greatly influences the food consumption score and thus it should be noted that IDPs in West Darfur receive 62 percent of the emergency ration and mixed communities receive 50 percent of the emergency ration. Additionally, the residents in West Darfur (apart from Abata) received drought mitigation rations in March and late April 2010, which contributed to the better consumption. When looking at food consumption by location, all locations have a score above the upper threshold, and there is a significant improvement in Mornei camp, Un Shalaya and Furbaranga residents compared to last round and last year. This can partly be attributed to food assistance. Furbaranga IDP camp has a significantly lower score than last round but similar to May 2009, nevertheless its consumption score is better than the threshold for acceptable score. Coping Strategy Index 10 6 Food consumption score, by community type 92% % 24% % 1 99% 84 IDP camps M ixed communities Resident communities Round 2 (M ay Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (M ay The proportion of households who have not experienced any food shortage or lack of cash to purchase food have increased among the resident communities compared to the last round. However, the situation is not as good as it was at the same time last year. The situation is similar to the last round for mixed communities and has slightly improved compared to May However, Coping strategies index, by community type 91% 87% 10 83% 88% 91% 97% 94% 79% 6 18% 12% 8% 11% % 3% 2% 9% 1% 1% 3% 6% 2% IDPs have a smaller proportion of households who never experienced any shortage of food or cash compared to the last round and last year. Among the IDPs some 8 percent of the households are engaged in low risk coping strategies while 11 percent are engaged in medium risk strategies, which is a shift from low to medium risk strategies compared to the last round. Mixed communities and residents have 9 percent and 6 percent respectively of their households who engaged in low risk coping strategies. Similar to last year, households with high coping strategies represented only 2 percent of the IDP households in this round. IDP camps M ixed communities Resident communities Round 2 (M ay Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (M ay DEMOGRAPHICS UPDATE 626 households were interviewed 22% were femaleheaded households. Average household size is 7 persons. The residential status of households included in the sample are: 42% resident 38% IDPs in camps 18% IDPs outside camps 2% refugees in camps 4

5 Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) MUAC measurement was carried out on 565 women in the productive age of 18 to 45 years. Generally MUAC has been stable since last year. Compared to last round in February 2010, there is even a reduction in the proportion of households with a MUAC measurement less than 225 mm in the three population groups. However, as seen in the graph the confidence intervals are overlapping and the error bars are very long indicating that there is a wide variation in the sample. It is not clear why there was a peak in February. Food Aid Utilization Proportion of women with low MUAC (<225 mm) 14% 12% 1 8% 6% 4% 2% 3% 9% MUAC for women 4% 2% 1 4% 5% 5% IDP camps Mixed communities Resident communities Round 2 (M ay Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (May 2% The proportion of households who reported selling food assistance is the same compared to the last round and the same time last year. There has been a slight increase in the proportion of resident households who sell food aid in this round compared to in last round 16 percent compared to 11 percent. However it is less than the same time last year May 2009 when as many as 21 percent reported having sold food aid % 5 25% 85% 86% No Food aid sold 15% Sale of Food aid 14% Food aid sold 72% 65% No Food aid sold 35% 28% 20 Food aid sold No Food aid sold 21% Food aid sold The situation in IDPs is very stable as shown in the IDP camps Mixed communities Resident chart and some 15 percent of IDPs report selling communities Round 2 (May Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (May food aid. There has not been a decrease in selling of food aid despite the lower ration in this round compared with the same time last year. Also among the mixed communities there is slight increase in the proportion of household selling food assistance in this round compared to the last round in February, however, it has decreased compared to the same time last year. The main commodities being sold are oil, pulses and cereal and the reasons for selling food assistance are to purchase other food commodities (23 percent), to cover milling cost (13 percent) and to purchase firewood (3 percent). Population movement Inter-tribal clashes in February between the two Arab tribes Misseriya and Naweiba resulted in increased insecurity in the area. More clashes have occurred around Mukjar, Bendisi and Um dokhon since April 2010, consequently leading to numerous population movements due to destruction of villages. All new arrivals were verified and registered following an interagency assessment that took place in the first half of May The total number of new arrivals is 28,252 people in Mukjar area, of whom 22,248 have received food assistance in May. Of the total arrivals, some have received one-month rations while others received food for two months depending on access. The remaining 6,000 people will receive food assistance in June. There have also been population movements during the month of May 2010 due to the frequent clashes between the same tribes around Zalingi, where some 4,686 were verified and registered and who will also be given food effective of June For further information, please contact: Ahmed Sabeel (Ahmed.Sabeel@wfp.org) or Yvonne Forsen (yvonne.forsen@wfp.org) UNITED NATIONS WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME SUDAN 5

6 Annex 1 Profile of Sentinel sites Name of Site Geographical characteristics Residential category Livelihood zone Last General Food Distribution Dorti Camp Geneina town IDP camp IDPs in camp IDP Camp in urban setting Agro- Pastoral North February 62% EMOP ration Dorti Falata Geneina satellite village Local residents Agro-pastoral North Seasonal Support Kulbus Northern Corridor Local residents Agro-pastoral North Seasonal Support Selea Northern Corridor Mixed community Agro-Pastoral North January 5 food ration Kandobi Northern Corridor Mixed community Agro-pastoral North February 5 food ration Um Tajouk Geneina East Mixed community Wadi February 5 food ration Azerni Geneina East Mixed community Wadi February 5 food ration Mornei Geneina East IDPs in camp IDPs in Rural Setting Wadi February 62% EMOP ration Um Shallaya Geneina East Local residents Wadi Seasonal Support Um Shallaya Refugees Geneina East Refugees in camp Refugees in Rural Setting Wadi February 62% ration Habila South/Southwest Corridor Mixed community Agro-pastoral South Received 5 ration for two months in January For Baranga IDPs South/Southwest corridor IDPs in camp IDPs in Urban Setting Agropastoral Received 5 ration for South two months in January For Baranga Residents South/Southwest Corridor Local residents Agro-Pastoral South Seasonal Support Sala South/Southwest Corridor Mixed community Agro-Pastoral South Received 5 ration for two months in January Beida South/Southwest Corridor Mixed community Agro-Pastoral South Received 5 ration for Mukjar Refugees South/East corridor Refugees in camp Refugees in Urban Setting West- Jebel Marra Lowland two months in January February 62% ration Garsila South/East corridor IDPs in camp IDPs in Urban Setting West-Jebel February 62% ration Marra Lowland Delej South/East corridor Mixed community West-Jebel Marra Lowland February 62% ration Um Dokhon South/East corridor Mixed community Cattle Agro-pastoral February 62% ration Al Karanik Zalingi town IDP camp IDPs in camp IDPs in Urban Setting West-Jebel Marra Lowland February 62% ration Shabab Zalingi town IDP camp IDPs in camp IDPs in Urban Setting West-Jebel February 62% ration Marra Lowland Abata Zalingi Satellite village Local residents West-Jebel Marra Lowland Not under GFD 6

7 Annex 2 Results of the 5 rounds of 2009/10 7

8 Annex 3 Result by indicator by sentinel site Location Round 1 (Feb Food Consumption and Expenditure Indicator Round 2 (May Round 3 (Aug Round 4 (Nov Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (May Dorti (camp) (-21%) 46 (-3%) 49 (6%) 59 (21%) 67 (13%) Dorti Flata (21%) 69 (-7%) 70 (1%) 68 (-3%) 68 (-1%) Kulbus (33%) 59 (-16%) 59 (-1%) 70 Selea (mixed) (-18%) 42 (15%) 38 (-9%) 61 Um Tajouk (mixed) (21%) 61 (27%) 55 (-9%) 61 (11%) 66 (8%) Azerni (mixed) (4%) 43 (-3%) 55 (28%) 59 (7%) 58 (-2%) Mornei (camp) (-22%) 53 (36%) 43 (-19%) 46 (8%) 66 (43%) Um Shalaya (-8%) 51 (12%) 47 (-8%) 49 (5%) 69 () Um Shalaya (camp) (-1%) 44 (4%) 43 (-3%) 52 (23%) 58 (11%) Habila (mixed) (-1) 42 (-9%) 55 (3) 55 (-1%) 61 (12%) Furbaranga (camp) (-22%) 50 (44%) 35 (-31%) 57 (63%) 41 (-28%) Furbaranga (12%) 36 (-52%) 52 (45%) 39 (-25%) 69 (77%) Sala (mixed) () 41 (-21%) 46 (11%) 53 (15%) 59 (12%) Beida (mixed) (16%) 59 (8%) 49 (-17%) 59 () 67 (13%) Mukjar (camp) (-19%) 44 (5%) 43 (-2%) 45 (6%) 40 (-12%) Garsila (camp) (5%) 40 (-14%) 38 (-5%) 47 (26%) 49 (3%) Um Dukhun (mixed) (-13%) 52 (4%) 60 (17%) 57 (-6%) 52 (-9%) Al Karanik (camp) (3) 51 (-16%) 45 (-12%) 45 () 57 (28%) Nertiti (camp) (16%) 55 (-6%) 53 (-3%) 52 (-3%) 51 (-1%) Abata (-19%) 58 () 64 (12%) 62 (-3%) Delej (mixed) (-27%) 61 (46%) 51 (-17%) 51 () Kandobi (mixed) (-32%) 52 (54%) 54 (3%) 46 (-15%) Location Round 1 (Feb Food consumption score Round 2 (May Round 3 (Aug Round 4 (Nov Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (May Dorti (camp) (-21%) 46 (-3%) 49 (6%) 59 (21%) 67 (13%) Dorti Flata (21%) 69 (-7%) 70 (1%) 68 (-3%) 68 (-1%) Kulbus (33%) 59 (-16%) 59 (-1%) 70 Selea (mixed) (-18%) 42 (15%) 38 (-9%) 61 Um Tajouk (mixed) (21%) 61 (27%) 55 (-9%) 61 (11%) 66 (8%) Azerni (mixed) (4%) 43 (-3%) 55 (28%) 59 (7%) 58 (-2%) Mornei (camp) (-22%) 53 (36%) 43 (-19%) 46 (8%) 66 (43%) Um Shalaya (-8%) 51 (12%) 47 (-8%) 49 (5%) 69 () Um Shalaya (camp) (-1%) 44 (4%) 43 (-3%) 52 (23%) 58 (11%) Habila (mixed) (-1) 42 (-9%) 55 (3) 55 (-1%) 61 (12%) Furbaranga (camp) (-22%) 50 (44%) 35 (-31%) 57 (63%) 41 (-28%) Furbaranga (12%) 36 (-52%) 52 (45%) 39 (-25%) 69 (77%) Sala (mixed) () 41 (-21%) 46 (11%) 53 (15%) 59 (12%) Beida (mixed) (16%) 59 (8%) 49 (-17%) 59 () 67 (13%) Mukjar (camp) (-19%) 44 (5%) 43 (-2%) 45 (6%) 40 (-12%) Garsila (camp) (5%) 40 (-14%) 38 (-5%) 47 (26%) 49 (3%) Um Dukhun (mixed) (-13%) 52 (4%) 60 (17%) 57 (-6%) 52 (-9%) Al Karanik (camp) (3) 51 (-16%) 45 (-12%) 45 () 57 (28%) Nertiti (camp) (16%) 55 (-6%) 53 (-3%) 52 (-3%) 51 (-1%) Abata (-19%) 58 () 64 (12%) 62 (-3%) Delej (mixed) (-27%) 61 (46%) 51 (-17%) 51 () Kandobi (mixed) (-32%) 52 (54%) 54 (3%) 46 (-15%) * Cells contain mean values and within parenthesis the percent change of the mean compared to the preceding monitoring round * Red cells indicate statistically significant deterioration and green cells statistically significant improvement compared to the preceding monitoring round. 8

9 Annex 4 Result by indicator by sentinel site Absolute income (Per day per person) Location Round 1 (Feb Round 2 (May Round 3 (Aug Round 4 (Nov Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (May Dorti (camp) (-6) 1 (9%) 1.1 (5%) 2 (87%) 3.7 () Dorti Flata (-28%) 1.6 (6%) 2 (24%) 1.9 (-7%) 5.9 (217%) Kulbus (-8%) 2.2 (15%) 1.7 (-26%) 4.2 Selea (mixed) (-7) 0.9 (97%) 1.1 () 2.3 Um Tajouk (mixed) (-44%) 1.4 (69%) 1 (-29%) 3 (199%) 3.4 (15%) Azerni (mixed) (-5) 1.1 (43%) 1.2 (8%) 2.5 (11) 2.9 (17%) Mornei (camp) (-61%) 1.1 (83%) 0.7 (-34%) 1.7 (131%) 2.9 (77%) Um Shalaya (-33%) 1.1 (-14%) 1.3 (21%) 2.8 (118%) 4 (42%) Um Shalaya (camp) (1%) 0.7 (-34%) 0.9 (21%) 2.6 (199%) 2.8 (9%) Habila (mixed) (29%) 1.7 (-19%) 2 (21%) 1.6 (-) 2.2 (36%) Furbaranga (camp) (-58%) 2.5 (184%) 0.9 (-64%) 2.9 (228%) 1.8 (-38%) Furbaranga (-26%) 1 (-66%) 2 (115%) 1.6 (-24%) 5.3 (2) Sala (mixed) (-43%) 2.5 (66%) 1.3 (-47%) 1.6 (21%) 2.7 (66%) Beida (mixed) (-3%) 3 (95%) 1.3 (-55%) 1.9 (43%) 3.3 (72%) Mukjar (camp) (11%) 0.9 (-32%) 0.6 (-3) 1.5 (144%) 1.5 () Garsila (camp) (51%) 0.8 (-48%) 0.6 (-34%) 1.5 (172%) 1.4 (-9%) Um Dukhun (mixed) (14%) 1.7 (-) 1.5 (-1) 1.8 () 2.1 (14%) Al Karanik (camp) (62%) 2.3 (19%) 1.5 (-35%) 1.6 (9%) 2.7 (67%) Nertiti (camp) (-18%) 2.6 (72%) 1.7 (-35%) 2.3 (37%) 2.5 (9%) Abata (-33%) 1.4 (-27%) 2.9 (102%) 2.4 (-15%) Delej (mixed) (-51%) 1.6 (22%) 2 (31%) 1.8 (-1) Kandobi (mixed) (2%) 1.4 (94%) 2.1 (58%) 2.8 (29%) Proportion of expenditures spent on food Location Round 1 (Feb Round 2 (May Round 3 (Aug Round 4 (Nov Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (May Dorti (camp) 67% 65% (-3%) 6 (-8%) 61% (3%) 67% (9%) 61% (-9%) Dorti Flata 68% 58% (-15%) 59% (1%) 6 (3%) 64% (6%) 48% (-24%) Kulbus 58% 59% (1%) 56% (-5%) 64% (13%) 62% Selea (mixed) 7 74% (5%) 6 (-19%) 72% () 72% Um Tajouk (mixed) 63% 55% (-13%) 46% (-16%) 61% (32%) 63% (2%) 57% (-1) Azerni (mixed) 79% 67% (-15%) 54% (-) 73% (36%) 54% (-26%) 57% (5%) Mornei (camp) 67% 63% (-6%) 53% (-16%) 69% (3) 62% (-9%) 61% (-2%) Um Shalaya 69% 6 (-12%) 58% (-4%) 65% (13%) 53% (-18%) 51% (-5%) Um Shalaya (camp) 67% 65% (-3%) 6 (-8%) 71% (19%) 63% (-11%) 63% () Habila (mixed) 76% 6 (-21%) 58% (-3%) 62% (6%) 59% (-5%) 66% (12%) Furbaranga (camp) 73% 74% (2%) 51% (-31%) 7 (37%) 61% (-12%) 73% (19%) Furbaranga 65% 57% (-12%) 66% (16%) 61% (-8%) 68% (12%) 55% (-19%) Sala (mixed) 6 48% (-21%) 54% (14%) 71% (3) 62% (-12%) 63% (2%) Beida (mixed) 71% 58% (-18%) 51% (-13%) 64% (26%) 66% (3%) 6 (-9%) Mukjar (camp) 52% (54%) 73% (-1) 65% (-1) 68% (5%) 74% (8%) Garsila (camp) 63% 6 (-5%) 76% (27%) 61% (-) 57% (-6%) 67% (17%) Um Dukhun (mixed) 68% 6 (-1) 6 (-1%) 66% (1) 59% (-1) 63% (6%) Al Karanik (camp) 58% 48% (-17%) 54% (13%) 56% (4%) 63% (12%) 58% (-8%) Nertiti (camp) 6 49% (-19%) 52% (8%) 6 (14%) 61% (3%) 58% (-6%) Abata 42% 65% (53%) 67% (3%) 5 (-26%) 62% (24%) Delej (mixed) 48% 66% (37%) 61% (-7%) 61% (-1%) 72% (18%) Kandobi (mixed) 64% 65% (1%) 66% (2%) 59% (-11%) 7 (19%) 9

10 MUAC Location Round 1 (Feb Round 2 (May Round 3 (Aug Round 4 (Nov Round 5 (Feb Round 6 (May Dorti (camp) (-6%) 256 (-5%) 242 (-5%) 270 (11%) 268 (-1%) Dorti Flata (-1%) 257 (1%) 252 (-2%) 251 () 251 () Kulbus (-1%) 260 (-6%) 276 Selea (mixed) (-9%) 256 () 275 Um Tajouk (mixed) (1%) 285 (2%) 270 (-5%) 253 (-7%) 279 (1) Azerni (mixed) (3%) 275 (2%) 270 (-2%) 257 (-5%) 271 (5%) Mornei (camp) (9%) 282 () 269 (-5%) 249 (-7%) 263 (6%) Um Shalaya (9%) 275 (-1%) 259 (-6%) 259 () 254 (-2%) Um Shalaya (camp) (1%) 276 (1%) 261 (-6%) 259 (-1%) 278 (7%) Habila (mixed) (4%) 265 (-2%) 256 (-4%) 278 (9%) 284 (2%) Furbaranga (camp) (-6%) 258 (-1%) 262 (2%) 283 (8%) Furbaranga (-17%) 274 (16%) 277 (1%) 282 (2%) Sala (mixed) (5%) 261 (-4%) 257 (-1%) 251 (-3%) 284 (13%) Beida (mixed) (3%) 269 (-7%) 259 (-3%) 280 (8%) 266 (-5%) Mukjar (camp) (4%) 269 (-5%) 260 (-3%) 255 (-2%) Garsila (camp) (6%) 267 (-2%) 269 (1%) 263 (-2%) 260 (-1%) Um Dukhun (mixed) (2%) 273 (2%) 271 (-1%) 262 (-3%) 264 (1%) Al Karanik (camp) (5%) 267 (-1%) 268 () 265 (-1%) 250 (-6%) Nertiti (camp) (-5%) 272 (5%) 248 (-9%) 261 (5%) 269 (3%) Abata (-3%) 272 (4%) 263 (-3%) 255 (-3%) Delej (mixed) (2%) 265 (-2%) 260 (-2%) 257 (-1%) Kandobi (mixed) (-11%) 257 (3%) 276 (7%) 272 (-1%) 10