Protein Sources : State of Play in Europe

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Protein Sources : State of Play in Europe"

Delilah Thompson
6 years ago
Views:

1 Protein Sources : State of Play in Europe Spijkenisse, May 12 th 2016 Dr.ir. Leon Marchal Director Nutrition & Innovation Leon.Marchal@forfarmers.eu Overview Current state of play Demand & Supply Influencing factors Outlook Will the type of protein we use change? Conclusion / Take home message 2 1

2 ForFarmers Nutritional solutions provider #1 European feed producer Servicing over 25,000 farmers Total Feed volume of 9.1mT More than 2,300 employees ForFarmers clients, species and products All farm sizes Ruminant Swine Poultry Total Feed solution On farm advisory and support Compound feed Specialties Dry Moist Liquid (DML) Crop Volume: 45% 34% 21% A look at animal protein NL protein consumption 42% 50% 3% Feed conversion [ds feed /kg carcass] 0,8 4,5 8 2,3 1,5 2,1 Protein conversion [CP carcass, milk, egg 25 33% 35% / CP feed] 9% 24% 19% 37% Human consumable / non consumable

Livestock Feed EU 28 475m tonnes in 2014 (Source: FEFAC DG Agriculture / eurostat, million tonnes) Purchased

Composition by Compound Feed Industry 2014 (Source: FEFAC) Dried Forage, 1% Dairy Products, 1% Pulses, 1% Minerals,

3 Livestock Feed EU m tonnes in 2014 (Source: FEFAC DG Agriculture / eurostat, million tonnes) Purchased Straight Feedingstuffs 38mt Home grown cereals 51mt Forages 233mt Industrial Compound Feed 153mt 5 Feed Material Composition by Compound Feed Industry 2014 (Source: FEFAC) Dried Forage, 1% Dairy Products, 1% Pulses, 1% Minerals, Additives and Vitamins; 3% All Others; 4% Feed cereals 48% Cakes & Meals 28% 6 Oils & Fats 2% Co Products from Food Industry 12% 3

EU 27 balance sheet protein Raw material Self sufficiency Soybeans/meal 2% Rapeseed and sunflower seed/meals 74% Pulses 94% Dried forages 106% Misc.

4 EU 27 balance sheet protein Raw material Self sufficiency Soybeans/meal 2% Rapeseed and sunflower seed/meals 74% Pulses 94% Dried forages 106% Misc. (groundnuts, linseed, cotonseed, corn gluten 56% Feed etc) Total protein rich feedstuffs [Eu] 31% Total protein in compound feeds [Europe] 52 56% Total protein in total ration [Europe] 73 76% Source: Prolea/Fefac 2012/2013 & WUR (Marinus van Krimpen) 7 EU import and production protein rich More or less stable the last 40 year 8 4

5 How will the future look? 9 European Protein status Increasing demand Decreasing demand Protein Increasing supply Decreasing supply 10 5

6 Increasing protein demand? Yes Most likely No 11 Meat consumption per capita decreases Population almost constant million and decreasing after 2035 (Eurostat, 2011) 12 6

Meat consumption decreases: Sustainability Worries on impact meat

about Animal welfare Romantic pictures <> perceived reality Worries

world standard welfare requirements environmental requirements Pork

7 Meat consumption decreases: Sustainability Worries on impact meat consumption Focus on less food waste = less production Worries about Animal welfare Romantic pictures <> perceived reality Worries about Health 13 Import/export More export Less export Stricter than world standard welfare requirements environmental requirements Pork & Poultry Global demand increase Quality Dairy Most likely less export 14 7

8 Efficiency increase Broiler Chicken Parameters Body weight [kg] Age at slaughter [days] Feed conversion rate [ ] (Source: IFIF 2013) 15 Efficiency increase 1 2% efficiency increase per year Genetic improvements Better housing / management Improved feeds Aminoacids Enzymes (phytases, xylanases etc) Phytogenic compounds More advanced nutrient systems i.e. 16 8

Efficiency increase Customized feeding Sensor

individual (genetic) potential 17 Efficiency

feed/ kg egg Battery Cage (now banned in EU) 1.

27 Source:ForFarmers, 2009,2013 15% decrease

9 Efficiency increase Customized feeding Sensor technology Dynamic Feeding Feeding to individual (genetic) potential 17 Efficiency decrease Alternative housing Type of housing Kg feed/ kg egg Battery Cage (now banned in EU) 1.98 Voliere 2.14 Free Range 2.27 Source:ForFarmers, 2009, % decrease Improved welfare is a good development, but has impacts on resources needed 18 9

10 Efficiency decrease Organic System Swine (Feed conversion 25kg end) Organic 2.98 Regular 2.51 Source: Agroscoop, % decrease Reasons: More welfare, which again is a good thing no amino acids no enzymes like phytase higher protein levels in the feed 19 Efficiency decrease Organic could be much more environmental friendly when: Allowing the use of amino acids Allowing the use of modern enzymes like phytase Both are in essence natural fermentation products 20 10

Area and yields for major crops Supply Production [million t]

2005/2007 2050 2005/2007 2050 Wheat 614 858 222 225 2.8 3.

2 Source: FAO 2012 21 Supply Use the Carbohydrates & Lipids

11 Area and yields for major crops Supply Production [million t] Harvested Area [million ha] Yield [tonnes/ha] 2005/ / / Wheat Maize 734 1, Soya beans Source: FAO Supply Use the Carbohydrates & Lipids Protein Increases of raw material ingredient price More supply of (cheaper) protein 22 11

Supply & Demand Increased feed prices good or

meat/egg/ milk prices: Feed prices meat/egg/milk

Demand Feed prices meat/egg/milk prices Lead to:

Better housing and management is more economic

12 Supply & Demand Increased feed prices good or bad? When imbalance between feed prices and meat/egg/ milk prices: Feed prices meat/egg/milk prices 23 Increased feed prices when: Supply & Demand Feed prices meat/egg/milk prices Lead to: Better feeding of the animals is more economic Better housing and management is more economic Less waste of food by consumers Less protein needed 24 12

13 Overall Less European consumption Less export (meat, eggs) More efficiency Increased yields own production Higher prices More export (Dairy) Less efficiency (organic, welfare) Decreased European acreage Most likely a decrease in European protein demand 25 Will the type of proteins we use change? 26 13

14 Drivers for change Driver Technology Legislation Consumer demand / acceptance Output Cost reduction Safer / cleaner Better (Consumer benefit) Drivers for change Animal protein Driver Technology Legislation Consumer demand / acceptance Output Cost reduction Was main focus Safer / cleaner Better (Consumer benefit) Should be more future focus Hard to distinguish Small % premium products and mainly on animal welfare issues Small % can absorb additional sustainability costs 14

Other protein sources? Legislation: Impact EU legislation & agricultural policy Consumer Is the consumer willing to pay something more and for what?

15 Other protein sources? Legislation: Impact EU legislation & agricultural policy Consumer Is the consumer willing to pay something more and for what? Technology Is new technology providing protein cheaper or better? 29 Legislation EU law Reintroduction of Processed Animal Protein Insect protein Novel protein law Very restrictive EU GMO laws Slows down the developments of new protein crops in Europe EU agriculture policy Greening = 5% of acreage = less production Positive incentives for EU protein production? Luddism (1812) 30 15

16 Consumer Small percentage of consumer is really informed on facts Consumer is mainly focused on animal welfare NGO s play a role Main themes Local Non gmo Sustainability (i.e. certified soy) Increase the reference protein price 31 Reference protein price The current price levels and origin of protein are mainly a reflection of technology & markets i.e. protein is produced were it is most economic When considering alternatives the protein price will increase Improved technology may lower this price gap (not a guarantee) 32 16

17 Other protein sources? A) More cultivation of know varieties EU soja and other oilseeds Legumes peas, beans, lupins Focus should be improving the yield under EU conditions Breeding efforts are essential 33 Other protein sources? B) New protein sources Leaf proteins Insects Aquatic proteins Largely still in research phase Have a positive marketing effect (a story to tell) 34 17

18 Leaf protein Sugar beet leaves Grass + Good amino acid profile Energy consumption (transport, isolation protein and drying) Economics Insects

Insects in feed EU directive: 8 October 2015 Insect meal is still not allowed Live feeding to farm animals is not forbidden Substrate of insects should be GMP+ Further need to investigate safety

19 Insects in feed EU directive: 8 October 2015 Insect meal is still not allowed Live feeding to farm animals is not forbidden Substrate of insects should be GMP+ Further need to investigate safety aspects 37 Insects Life feeding of insects larvae (black soldier fly) Chickens love insects More lively natural behaviour Part of enrichment concepts 38 19

duckweed 38% CP, 20 25 ton ds per ha Very efficient nutrient uptake Part of manure

conversion) of 1 2% per year Most likely a decrease in European protein demand None

20 Aquatic proteins i.e. duckweed 38% CP, ton ds per ha Very efficient nutrient uptake Part of manure treatment Conclusion/ take home message Efficiency increase (yield acre, feed conversion) of 1 2% per year Most likely a decrease in European protein demand None of the drivers for change in the type and origin of proteins used (Consumer, Legislation, Technology) are currently strong In some premium segments more European protein For the rest certified (especially soy) imported proteins 40 20

21 the total feed business Dr.ir. Leon Marchal Director Nutrition & Innovation 41 21

Feed Industry Perspective on EU Protein Production Nick Major FEFAC President

Feed Industry Perspective on EU Protein Production Nick Major FEFAC President 23 November 2018 Vienna What is FEFAC? European Association of Compound Feed Manufacturers Founded in 1959 Association of associations