RESULTS FRAMEWORK Planned

Transcription

1 IMPACT (and target group):by 2020 Priority fisheries in the South West Indian Ocean are being managed based on socially inclusive and environmentally sustainable approaches and are contributing to increased socio-economic benefits to the local fishing communities and the respective countries Outcome 1: SWIOFC, SWIO states and local fishing communities ensure that sustainably managed healthy and productive populations of coastal fish stocks in Kenya, Tanzania and Mozambique are contributing to food security and national economies and supporting the livelihoods of local communities 1.1 Number of fisheries demonstrating improved levels of sustainable management, stock status and ecosystem health as measured by the Bench Marking and Tracking Tool (BMT)* Index/score. Current BMT Indexes: - Octopus in Tanzania: 48% (2016) - Lobster in Kenya: 78% (2015) - Deep-water shrimp fisheries in Mozambique: 56% (2015) - Shallow water shrimp fisheries in Mozambique: 66% (2015) Lobster 80+% in Kenya Octopus 60+% in Tanzania Shallow water shrimp 60+% in Mozambique Deepwater shrimp 80+% in Mozambique Annual Fisheries Statistics, government Output 1.1 WWF and National Fisheries Management Organizations in Kenya, Tanzania, Madagascar and Mozambique have reviewed the fisheries improvement plans (FIPs)** for lobster, octopus and shrimp respectively and strengthen CSO market capacity. (delivers on outcome indicator 1.2) Output 1.2 WWF and local partners, including national fisheries management organizations, have developed harvest strategy and control rules for the priority community fisheries (delivers on outcome indicator 1.1) Output 1.3 WWF and the local partners (CSOs, the industry, the national and local governments, research institutes) develop Monitoring and Compliance strategies for the lobster (in Kenya), octopus (Tanzania and Madagascar) and shrimp (Mozambique). (deliver on outcome indicator 1.3 and 1.1.) 1.2 Number of inshore commercial fisheries that are going through the MSC certification process Economic contribution of small scale marine fisheries sub-sector to the local fishing communties and the national economy Number of national FIP review Number of reviewed FIP action plans Number of harvest strategy and control rules developed for the lobster (in Kenya), octopus (Tanzania and Madagascar) and shrimp (Mozambique) Output 1.4 WWF and national fisheries research institues have assessed the impact of fishing for lobster (Kenya), octopus (Tanzania and Madagascar), shrimp (Mozambique) on Endangered, Threatened and Protected Species (ETPs) (deliver on outcome indicator 1.1.) 1.4 Number of assessment/research studies/ Output 1.5 WWF and the industry partners have commissioned 1.5 Assessment report for the Kenya and concluded full assessment of the Kenya lobster fishery along lobster fishery the MSC standards (deliver on outcome indicator 1.2.) 1 (Hake Fishery in South Africa) 2 (1 in Kenya and 1 in Mozambique) Records of MSC assessment Kenya; Lamu as artisanal tuna case study: Quantity, 152Mt annually; valued at US$ 200,000 (2015). Tanzania- Zanzibar case study. some 34,104 Mt (2016) of small scale fisheries valued at US$ 64.7 M are landed in Zanzibar Archipelago annually. On average 1 per 2 years per FIP 4 FIPs are in place (lobster in Kenya, Octopus in Tanzania and Madagascar; and Shrimp (deep/shallow water) in Mozambique) which are subjected to regular annual reviews to monitor progress Economic contribution increased by at least 14%, compared to the 2015 levels National statistics, repeat case studies 12 (1 per FIP per year in Kenya, of Mozambique and Tanzania) 4 FIP Action plans 0 4 (one each country) Harvest strategies and control rules Number of organized 0 16 (three per contry) Meeting 1.3 Number of MCS strategies developed one for each country (Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique and Madagascar) one for each country (Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique and Madagascar) 0 (pre-assessment of the Kenya lobster fishery was done in 2009 and FIP Action plan which is currently under with the BMT Index of 78%) Monitoring and Compliance strategies Assessment/studies 1 in Kenya Assessment report

2 Output 1.6 Industry partners and CAB Consultant with the financial support of WWF organize stakeholder consultations and public reviews on the Kenya lobster fishery assessment report (deliver on outcome indicator 1.2.) Output 1.7 WWF provide financial support to the industry partners to refine the assessment report and have it submitted to the MSC for consideration of the award of MSC certification to the lobster fishery. (deliver on outcome indicator 1.2.) Output 1.8 WWF and the local partners (national fisheries management organizations, CSOs and local fishing communities) have identified model fisheries co- management units (e.g Beach Management Units) in priority sites for infrastructural development and improvements along the value chain (deliver on outcome indicator 1.3.) Number of model co-management units/landing sites identified Output 1.9 WWF with the local partners (CSOs and local fishing communities) have developed business plans on developing infrastructure along the value chain in model co-management units (deliver on outcome indicator 1.3.) Output 1.10 WWF and partners have developed and integrated rights-based approaches in the national/local fisheries policies and management plans for the priority nearshore/coastal fisheries (deliver on outcome indicator 1.3.) Output 1.11 WWF and partners have trained and built the capacity of local fishing communities to lobby and influence fisheries related policies that are pro-poor (deliver on outcome indicator 1.3.) 1.6 Number of stakeholder consultations 0 4 in Kenya Meeting Final assessment report 0 1 in Kenya MSC assessment report 6 (3 in Kenya and 3 in Tanzania) 10 (3 in Mozambique, 3 in Kenya, 3 in Tanzania and 1 in Madagascar) Meeting, project, Government 1.9 Number of business plans 0 4 Business plans Number of fisheries policies/plans that integrate rights-based approach to fisheries management Output 1.12 WWF with partners have organized lesson learning Number of lesson learning tours tour involving the relevant fishing communities, WWF oficials and and exchange programmes governments institutions (deliver on outcome indicator 1.3.). 1 (Mozambique) 3 (Kenya, Tanzania and Madagascar) National fisheries policies and management plans Number of fishers trained representatives of local fishing communities trained per year Number of training workshops 2 10 (3 in Mozambique, 3 in Kenya, 3 in Tanzania and 1 in Madagascar) 2 4 ( involving at least 4 representatives of fishing communities per country) Training/meeting Training/meeting Mission/trip Outcome 2: SWIO range states develop and proposing IOTC resolutions, that ensure that tuna fisheries are sustainably managed and are contributing to increased fish productivity and economic returns from fisheries to the respective national economies and local fishing communities. 2.1 Number of proposals submitted to the annual session of the IOTC 0 (1 Submitted on offshore YFT measures by Kenya in 2016 but none on coastal tuna) 2.2 Tuna fisheries contribution to the Kenya: $2,034,147 (2014) national economy for respective SWIO Tanzania: $ 2,080,500 (2014) states Mozambique: $ 614,815 (2014) 2.3 Number of SWIO states that have adopted and are implementing low cost innovative technologies to improve transparency for informed decisions that drive fisheries to sustainability, fair trade and legal practices. 2 per year IOTC Sessions Document Lists (available online) 20% increase in fisheries contribution to the national economies Annual Fisheries Statistics, Annual Economic of CEA countries 0 3 (Mozambique, Kenya and Tanzania) Government

3 Output 2.1 WWF with partners (national fisheries management 2.1 Number of national tuna fisheries organizations and CSOs) have organized national tuna/fisheries dialogues dialogues to share experiences and review progress made with the of national tuna fisheries management strategies in the respective SWIO range states. (deliver on outcome indicator 2.2.) Output 2.2: WWF provides financial and technical support to enable National Fisheries Management Organizations and other key stakeholders (including CSOs) in the SWIO to develop tuna fisheries management plans for priority fisheries (deliver on outcome indicator 2.2.) Output 2.3: WWF and partners (CSOs) have undertaken a detailed assessment and organized round table discussions with the national fisheries management organizations and shared recommendations of the MCS, transparency and traceability gap analysis in IOTC members States. (deliver on outcome indicator 2.3.2) Output 2.4: WWF and partner have trained government staff in the IO range states on lobbying and negotiation skills for fair and equitable sustainable fisheries acccess arrangements with the Distant Water Fishing Nations (DWFN) (deliver on outcome indicator 2.2.) Outcome 3: SWIOFC member states strengthen subregional fisheries governance Number of tuna management plans that have been drafted through an all inclussive stakeholder process and encompassing WWF sustainability principles Number of roundtable discussions on transparancy organized 0 4 annual national tuna dialogues (in Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique and Madagascar) 4 (Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique and Madagascar) 6 (2 in Mozambique, 2 in Kenya and 2 in Tanzania) 0 6 (1 in Mozambique, 2 in Kenya, 1 in Madagascar and 2 in Tanzania) Meeting Management plans, meeting on roundtable discussions Transparancy gap analysis 1 in process, draft report available for some countries in the SWIO and needs to be shared with the respective countries. Need to undertake studies for other select countries in the SWIO region, due for completion by end FY17. 1 in the region Transparancy gap analysis report Number of government staff in the SWIO trained 3.1 Number of agreed regional fisheries management policies/strategies harmonized 0 20 (at least 2 from each country) Training/meeting 1 (Regional Minimum Terms & Conditions for Fisheries Access adopted by 3 countries in the region) - Kenya, Tanzania and Mozambique 1 Rregional Fisheries Accord 1 Minimum Sustainability Terms and Conditions Regional agreements Output 3.1 WWF has provided technical and financial support to the SWIO range states to update and adopt the regional Minimum Terms and Conditions for fisheries access arrangements (deliver on outcome indicator 3.1.) Output 3.2 WWF has provided technical and financial support to the SWIO range states through the SWIOFC- Working Party on Tuna Matters, for improved governance including the MTC and SWIO Fisheries Accord. in the development of a Regional Fisheries Accord (deliver on outcome indicator 3.1.) Number of WWF facilitated 4 2 addiotinal ones SWIOFC, MTC drafting/consultation on regional Taskforce MTC Draft MTC 1 1 (updated) Draft MTC document Number of WWF facilitated 3 5 (3 WPCCTF and 2 SWIOFC ) SWIOFC drafting/consultation on regional Fisheries Accord Draft fisheries accord 0 1 (high level meeting) Draft Regional Fisheries Acoord Output 3.3 WWF has provided SWIO states financial and technical support to actively and productively participate in the SWIOFC regular sessions, Scientific committee and tuna working party (deliver on outcome indicator 3.1.) Number of proposals and decisions by countries that promote stock sustainability and improved fisheries governance. 0 5 SWIOFC meeting

4 3.3.2 Number of facilitated by WWF 4 (Since 2013, WWF has been providing financial and technical support to the SWIOFC working party on tuna matters, and most recent ones being the SWIOFC regular commission meeting held in 2015 in which WWF was given an award by SWIOFC during their 10th year Annivassary celeberation in Maputo, and SWIOFC Working Pary meeting held in Zanzibar in March (1 meeting of the SWIOFC Working Party on Tuna Matters per year) SWIOFC meeting Output 3.4: WWF and SWIO states have commissioned and concluded a consultancy to review and assess the compliance of the SWIO to the EU IUU Regulation requirements (deliver on outcome indicator 3.1.) Output 3.5: WWF provide financial support to SADC to support the establishment of the SWIO sub-regional MCS Coordination Centre in Maputo to curb IUU fishing (deliver on outcome indicator 3.1.) Outcome 4: Indian Ocean Tuna Commision (IOTC) has adopted and implemented effective conservation and sustainability measures related to the four principal tuna stocks, key neritic tuna stocks and tuna-like species. Output 4.1 WWF and partners (e.g. ISSF and the retail-sector) educate and lobby for adoption of conservation and sustainable measures related to priority tuna stocks at, or rebuild to, ecologically sustainable levels (deliver on outcome indicator 4.2; 4.5.) 3.4 Number of assessment on the status and level of compliance with the EU IUU Catch certification scheme by SWIO range states. 3.5 Regional MCS Coordination center operationalized 4.1 Level of stock sustainability of principle tuna species (MSY) 4.2 Level of stock sustainability of neritic tuna species (MSY) 0 1 Assessment report 0 1 in Mozambique on operationalization of MCS centre Albacore (Catch = 40,981t; MSY = 47,6000t), Bigeye (Catch = 100,231t; MSY = 132,000t; Skipjack (Catch = 432,467t; MSY = 684,000t), Yellowfin (Catch = 430,327t; MSY = 421,000t) bullet tuna (catch = 8,117t; MSY = unknown), frigate tuna (catch = 97,980t; MSY = unknown), longtail tuna (catch = 147,587t; MSY = 122,000t) kawakawa (catch = 162,854t; MSY = 152,000t), Indo-Pacific mackerel (catch = 45953t; MSY = 43,000t), narrow-barred spanish mackerel (catch = 153,425t; MSY = 127,700t) All tuna catch managed at or below MSY IOTC/ISSF Assessment All tuna catch managed at or below MSY IOTC/ISSF Assessment 4.3 Level of by-catch Baseline to be determined by Q By-catch reduced by 50% compared to 2015 IOTC/ISSF Assessment 4.4 Level of compliance with the IOTC conservation and management measures 0, % IOTC Compliance Committee 4.5 Number of IOTC member states that have implemented the IOTC conservation and sustainability measures (e.g. Harvest Strategy and Control Rules, reduced fishing effort on yellowfin tuna IOTC Working Party on Compliance established Number of technical, position papers and recommendations on sustainabilty measures prepared Number of workshops / consultations held with member states and IOTC Baseline to be determined by Q % of the IOTC member states have implemented the measures IOTC, national 0 1 within IOTC framework IOTC 5 overall 5/year IOTC/ISSF Assessment 1/year 16 on consultative

5 Output 4.2 WWF and partners (e.g. ISSF and the retail-sector) Number of technical, position papers and recommendations on educate and lobby key member states and Indian Ocean Tuna sustainaibilty measures prepared Commision (IOTC) to adopt and implement effective conservation and sustainability measures related to the key Number of consultations held with neritic tuna stocks at, or rebuild to, ecologically sustainable levels member states and IOTC (deliver on outcome indicator 4.2.) Output 4.3 WWF and partners (e.g. ISSF and the retail-sector) educate and lobby key member states and IOTC to adopt international best practice conservation and management measures to effectively mitigate by-catch/non-target species catch. (deliver on outcome indicator 4.3.) Output 4.4 WWF and partners (e.g. ISSF, Retail Sector, National fisheries sector, CSOs) lobby and train Indian Ocean states administrations (with focus on SWIO countries) to comply with IOTC management and conservation measures for the principal tuna fisheries in the IOTC area of competence Output 4.5 WWF, CSOs and non-state actors orchestrate a joint advocacy campaign to lobby and influence IOTC member states to adopt and implement effective MCS to create transparency and traceability, as well as establish an equitable quota system. Output 4.6 WWF, ISSF and CSOs lobby and provide procedural support for the establishment of an IOTC Working Party on Compliance within the IOTC governance framework deliver on outcome indicator 4.6.) 1/year 5 IOTC/ISSF Assessment 1/year 16 on consultative Number of technical, 1 position paper 2 IOTC/ISSF Assessment position papers and recommendations on by-catch prepared Number of consultations held with member states and IOTC 4.4 Number of capacity building and training sessions on IOTC compliance 4.5 Number of advocacy campaigns on MCS and equitable quota systems Number of position papers and recommendations on Working Party on Compliance prepared Number of consultations held with member states and IOTC 1 8 on consultative 0 5 events with at least 100 representatives Training 1 3 Report on advocacy campaign 1 2 Position papers 1 4 on consultative Output 4.7 WWF has provided SWIO states financial and 4.7 Number of WWF has 4 (Since 2009, WWF has been providing financial 5 IOTC. facilitated attendance by SWIO states and technical support to enable SWIO countries technical Outcome support 5: CSOs to are actively empowered and productively and adequately participate engaged in the 5.1 Level of CSO engagement on TuNA (Tanzania): 1 (2013) All platforms achieveing 3 or higher Level of engagement and in fisheries decision making and policy processes, and they fisheries decision making and policy TUFAK (Kenya): TBD action assessment report processes increases as measured by FOSCAMC (Mozambique: TBD are holding the SWIO governments, Regional Fisheries the CSO level of engagement tool. Management Organisations (RFMO s), Regional Economic Communities (RECs) and Inter-Governmental Agencies (IGOs) accountable 5.1 WWF and partners have trained and build the capacity of the CSO platforms to lobby and influence fisheries, trade and market related policies that are in favour of WWF sustainability principles and best practices (deliver on outcome indicator 5.1.) Number of training workshops on fisheries policies Capacity of CSO platforms as measured by capacity assessment tool 4 (2 in Kenya and 2 in Tanzania) 9 Training TuNA: TBD TUFAK: 4 (2012) FOSCAMC: TBD CSO platforms move one level higher on CSO capacity asessment tool CSO Capacity Assessment Output 5.2 WWF and partner CSOs have organized public debates at relevant national and regional forums to address fisheries sustainability and equitable benefit sharing at national and regional levels in the SWIO range states(deliver on outcome indicator 5.1.) Output 5.3 WWF and partner CSOs establish alliances/networks of CSOs at national and regional level as part of the Number of public debates organized 0 9 on public debates, news releases, etc Number of position papers prepared by CSOs 5.3 Number of CSO platform that are established and actively engaging in 0 5 Position papers 4 TUFAK in Kenya; TuNA in Tanzania; FOSCAMC in Mozambique; SWIOTUNA - 7 (3 additional national forums for the island states Registration certificates for the CSO

6 Outcome 6: Fisheries and seafood supply chain actors (processors, traders, mongers, retailers) create market incentives for conservation and sustainable use of fish and seafood resources in the SWIO region by committing to produce, source, promote and market sustainable seafood Output 6.1: WWF, CSOs and other non-state actors rank and benchmark seafood supply chain actors against the MSC-BMT and WWF s sustainability criteria(deliver on outcome indicator 6.1.) Output 6.2: WWF and CSO partners informed and consulted fisheries and seafood supply chain businesses that have been benchmarked and ranked regarding necessary improvements to meet the MSC-BMT and WWF sustainability criteria (deliver on outcome indicator 6.1.) Output 6.3: WWF, CSOs and other relevant partners (e.g. MSC and ISSF) educate consumers about sourcing sustainable seafood, including developing consumer guiding tools (e.g. seafood guides and co-branding in case of MSC-certified seafood) (deliver on outcome indicator 6.2.) Output 6.4: WWF and CSOs promote 100% sustainable seafood businesses (outcome of the benchmarking under 6.1) as a reliable source to consumers and Industry partners (processors and retailers) on local, national and global markets. (deliver on outcome indicator 6.1.) Output 6.5: WWF lobbies for and implements transparency monitoring and documentation pilots with Governments, the RFMOs and relevant actors in the tuna supply chain, tuna trade and export market to implement and adopt transparency. (deliver on outcome indicator 6.2.) 6.1 Number of supply chain actors 1 (shrimp) 10 fisheries companies and 20 supply from the seafood committed 6.2 Number to of produce processors and and source traders/ 1 (shrimp) chain 5 actors in SWIO region business/entreprises from the seafood mongers/retailers in the seafood sector that have adopted and are implementing transparent trade monitoring and reporting protocols. business/entreprises Number of businesses benchmarked and ranked Number of workshops and consultations with fisheries and seasfood supply chain businesses Number of consumer campaigns educating and promoting sustainable seafood choices 0 20 fisheries companies 50 seafood supply chain businesses 10 key seafood exporting businesses Benchmarking 0 5 workshops: one each in Tanzania, Kenya, of workshops and Mozambique, South Africa and Madagascar consultations 25 bilateral consultations: on average 5 per country WWF-SA has a well developed seafood sustainability programm in partnership with seafood businesses 6.4 Number of seafood businesses promoted by WWF and CSOs (e.g. by communication tools like buyers guides; B to B recommendations at seafood shows including education and promotion of WWF FIP fisheries and PR as well as cobranding in case of MSC certified seafood) WWF-SA and businesses are promoting sustainable seafood through it s SASSI platform 6.5 Number of pilot projects on transparancy, monitoring and documentation implemented (including AIS or equivelant GPS tracking, traceability-measures, (electronic-) monitoring and catch documentation and certification schemes for fisheries, etc.) 5: one each in Kenya, Tanzania, WWF documents, Madagascar, South Africa and Mozambique from the seafood business/entreprises. Clippings and newspapers 10 sustainable seafood businesses (including fisheries) WWF and CSO publications, PR documents 1 (AIS pilot in Mozambique) 3 (1 country introduces AIS/GPS transmitters as mandatory measure for WWF, Government. from the fishing vessels; 1 product traceability pilot; 1 seafood e-catch documentation pilot) business/entreprises *The MSC Benchmarking and Tracking Tool (BMT) is a tool specifically designed to track fisheries as they improve towards MSC Certification (see **A fishery improvement project (FIP) operates via an alliance of seafood buyers, suppliers, and producers. These stakeholders work together to improve a specific fishery by pressing for better policies and management, while voluntarily changing purchasing and fishing practices to reduce problems such as illegal fishing, bycatch, and habitat impacts. ***Maximum sustainable yield or MSY is theoretically, the largest yield (or catch) that can be taken from a species' stock over an indefinite period. Work to be put on hold until further funding secured Work to be supported by current Norad grant funds,