Replacing Analytical Methods for Release and Stability Testing CBER Perspective
|
|
- Phyllis McBride
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Replacing Analytical Methods for Release and Stability Testing CBER Perspective Presentation at the CMC Strategy Forum January 27, 2014 Lokesh Bhattacharyya Chief, Lab of Analytical Chemistry and Blood Products, Div. of Biological Standard and Quality Control, OCBQ/CBER/FDA
2 Disclaimers My comments are an informal communication and represent my own best judgment. These comments do not bind or obligate FDA. All examples are based on typical review experience but are not taken from specific individual BLA or supplement 2
3 Introduction Method changes are normal part of product life-cycle Triggered by variety of factors Technical/scientific reasons replacing legacy methods Regulatory reasons Business Decision Other reasons Welcomed and encouraged by CBER Better product characterization Better understanding of product quality More robust and rugged methods with greater sensitivity, selectivity (specificity) and reliability Better insight into product stability factors affecting stability
4 Outline Categories of change Regulations and Guidances Submission Requirements (Perceived) Concerns Comparability Study Two Examples Changing Method During Stability Study 4
5 What do we do? Work in an ISO compliant Laboratory Quality System environment Routine Lot release testing of Vaccines, Blood Products and Blood Donor Kits for identity, potency, impurities and other critical components (e.g., thimerosal, adjuvant) using physicochemical, biochemical and biological assays Testing in support of BLA and Supplements Testing in support of CBER Reference Standards program BLAs and supplements: Review of physicochemical, biochemical and biological assays for the test methods and their validations for vaccines and blood products 5
6 Guidances FDA Guidances Demonstration of Comparability of Human Biological Products, Including Therapeutic Biotechnology-Derived Products, 1996 Changes to Approved Applications: Biological Products, 1997 Changes to an Approved Application for Specified Biotechnology and Specified Synthetic Biological Products, 1997 Comparability Protocols - Protein Drug Products and Biological Products-Chemistry, Manufacturing, & Controls Information, 2003 Changes to an Approved NDA or ANDA, 2004 ICH Q2(R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures, 2005 ICH Q5E - Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process,
7 Regulations 21 CFR (a)(1) An applicant must inform the FDA, through submission of a supplement to the original license application, about changes in the product, production process, quality controls or labeling established in the approved license application. (2) Before distributing a product made using a change, an applicant must assess the effects of the change and demonstrate through appropriate validation and/or other clinical and/or non-clinical laboratory studies the lack of adverse effect of the change on the identity, strength, quality, purity, or potency of the product as they may relate to the safety or effectiveness of the product. 7
8 Regulations The reporting categories for changes to an approved application are based on the probability of the changes to have a substantial, moderate or minimal potential to adversely affect the identity, strength, quality, purity and potency of the product as they may relate to the safety or effectiveness of the product. Risk Based (b) (1) Major Changes Substantial potential for adverse effect on the product - Prior Approval Supplement (c) (1) Moderate Potential - Supplement Changes Being Effected in 30 Days (d) (1) Minor Changes - Annual Report 8
9 FDA Guidance : Major Changes Changes to Approved Applications: Biological Products, July 1997 Changes requiring supplement (PAS) submission and approval prior to distribution of the product made using the change (major changes) (b) Any change in manufacturing processes or analytical methods that, Results in change(s) of specification limits or modification(s) in potency, sensitivity, specificity, or purity Establishes a new analytical method Deletes a specification or an analytical method Eliminates tests from the stability protocol Alters the acceptance criteria of the stability protocol
10 FDA Guidance : Major Changes New lot of, new source for, or different in-house reference standard or reference panel (panel member) resulting in modification of reference specifications or an alternative test method. This is a critical issue for many biochemical, immunochemical and biological assays, e.g., clotting assay for FIX potency Extension of the expiration dating period and/or a change in storage temperature, container/closure composition, or other conditions, other than changes based on real time data in accordance with a stability protocol in the approved license application.
11 FDA Guidance : Major Changes Prior Approval Supplements Content Detailed description of the proposed change The intermediates/drug substances/products involved The manufacturing site(s) or area(s) affected Detailed description of the new/revised method Description of studies performed to evaluate the effect of the change comparability report Describe the statistical method of evaluation in detail The data derived from those studies (report) Relevant validation protocols and data (report) A reference list of relevant standard operating procedures (SOPs)
12 FDA Guidance : Moderate Potential Changes requiring supplement submission at least 30 days prior to distribution of the product made using the change (c) Change in the site of testing from one facility to another From the license holder to a new contract lab From an approved contract lab to a new contract lab From a contract lab to the license holder Every thing else should remain the same assay procedure, standard, same/equivalent reagents and equipment, same qualification criteria, etc.
13 FDA Guidance : Moderate Potential Submission requirements same as PAS (Major Change) at least 30 days prior to distribution Submission should include adequate comparability data Reproducibility study (%RSD from replicate measurements in two labs) alone is not sufficient
14 FDA Guidance : Minor Changes Changes to be described in an annual report (minor changes) (d) Submission requirements A list of all products involved A full description of the changes The manufacturing site(s) or area(s) involved The date each change was made A cross-reference to relevant validation report(s) and/or SOPs Relevant data from studies and tests performed to evaluate the effect of the change on the identity, strength, quality, purity, or potency of the product as they may relate to the safety or effectiveness of the product
15 FDA Guidance : Minor Changes Changes that can be reported in the annual report (d) Modifications in analytical procedures with no change in the basic test methodology or existing release specifications provided the change is supported by validation data Tightening of specifications for existing reference standards to provide greater assurance of product purity, identity, and potency Establishment of an alternate test method for reference standards, release panels, or intermediates, except for release testing of intermediates licensed for further manufacture A change in the stability test protocol to include more stringent parameters (e.g., additional assays or tightened specifications)
16 FDA Guidance : Minor Changes Addition of time points to the stability protocol Change in the storage conditions of in-process intermediates based on data from a stability protocol in an approved license application, which does not affect labeling, except for changes in storage conditions which are specified by regulation Relocation of equipment within an approved operating room or rearrangement of the operating area
17 (Perceived) Concerns What if I find something new in an approved product (after changing to a new and improved method)? What will happen after opening Pandora s Box? This something has been in your product all the time your previous methods just did not see it Your manufacturing method is still the same you product composition is still the same Your product has been used and proven safe and efficacious Characterize this new thing (impurity) If it is really something that has safety issues, you rather want to know it now before it is too late FDA may ask you to do some additional studies to show that it is safe.
18 Comparability Study Analysis of the same samples by multiple analysts using both methods Multiple analysis of the same lot vs analysis of multiple lots How many lots or replicates? Clear understanding of what is changing/being compared Manufacturing process? Product characteristics? Ability to perform assay in a comparable manner? Comparability of analysts ability, equipment performance, reagents, etc.?
19 Comparability Study Selection of appropriate statistical method(s) for the evaluation of results What is the question you are asking? Understanding the purpose of the comparability study Appropriate null hypothesis Selection of samples How many factors do you want to vary at a time? Can your statistical method handle multivariate analysis? Number of samples/replicates should be large enough to have adequate statistical power Explain your statistical method in the comparability study report
20 Comparability Case Study 1 A SEC HPLC method is replaced by a RP-HPLC method for an impurity assay in a drug product Submitted as an annual report Justification Same basic methodology HPLC New method was reported as validated No validation data or comparability data included in the annual report This change should be submitted as a PAS a new analytical method All validation and comparability data should be included
21 Comparability Case Study 2 A potency method is transferred from Lab A to Lab B Data Submitted: Intermediate precision in each lab Three lots, three analysts in each lab Reportable results: %RSD Met acceptance criteria Reproducibility study between two labs Reportable results: %RSD Met acceptance criteria Comparability data for 6 lots, each analyzed three analysts in each lab Data analyzed by paired t-test PW > F crit at 95% CI but < F crit at 99% Conclusion : Pass My Observation: Lab 2 greater than Lab 1 for all 6 six lots; Ratio of results for 6 lots from 1.5 to 3.4
22 Changing Method During Stability Study Changing a method in the middle of an ongoing stability study presents many questions and uncertainties that need to be adequately addressed Is the new method stability indicating? Is the validation of the new method (as a stability indicating method) alone sufficient to introduce the new method in the middle of an ongoing stability study? How to compare results from both methods? What statistical method to use? How do you ascertain power of the statistical method, particularly if you are monitoring an impurity Should you run a pilot to make a prior assessment?
23 Changing Method During Stability Study Accelerated stability study evaluated using both old and methods? May often involve significant amount of additional work My personal thought (not CBER s position) avoid if you can If you plan to do so, draft your study-plan and discuss with FDA review staff for concurrence before introducing the new method in the stability program
24 Thank you Questions?
Replacing Analytical Methods for Release and Stability Testing A Regulatory Perspective
Replacing Analytical Methods for Release and Stability Testing A Regulatory Perspective Presentation at The IVT s 12 th Annual Analytical Procedure and Method Validation Conference Dec 12, 2016 Lokesh
More informationCommon Issues in Qualification and Validation of Analytical Procedures
Common Issues in Qualification and Validation of Analytical Procedures Alexey Khrenov, PhD OTAT/CBER/FDA CMC Strategy Forum January 29, 2018 - Washington, DC Disclaimer These comments are an informal communication
More informationAnalytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics
Final Guidance for Industry Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics Analytical procedures and Method Validation June 21, 2016 Lokesh Bhattacharyya Chief, LACBRP/DBSQC OCBQ/CBER/FDA
More informationGuidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Comparability Protocols - Protein Drug Products and Biological Products - Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls Information DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed
More informationRegulatory Perspective on Analytical Method Validation During Product Development
Regulatory Perspective on Analytical Method Validation During Product Development CASSS CMC Strategy Forum 2018 Jacek Cieslak CDER/OPQ/OBP FDA Disclaimer This presentation reflects the views of the author
More informationCell Therapy Product Manufacturing Considerations. July 17, 2017 CMC Strategy Forum Mo Heidaran, Ph.D.
Cell Therapy Product Manufacturing Considerations July 17, 2017 CMC Strategy Forum Mo Heidaran, Ph.D. Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies FDA/CBER Overview Establishing Manufacturing Control Applying
More informationWrap Up Summary CMC Strategy Forum. Bridging Analytical Methods Jan 27, 2014
Wrap Up Summary CMC Strategy Forum Bridging Analytical Methods Jan 27, 2014 Common Messages Industry and Regulatory Method lifecycle includes several elements that occur over time as needed to assure accurate,
More informationEstablished Conditions: Reportable CMC Changes for Approved Drug and Biologic Products Guidance for Industry
Established Conditions: Reportable CMC Changes for Approved Drug and Biologic Products Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments
More informationAnalytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics
Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics Lucinda (Cindy) Buhse, Ph. D. Acting Director, Office of Testing and Research Office of Pharmaceutical Science CDER, FDA CHPA Quality
More informationControl strategy and validation. Emanuela Lacana PhD Office of Biotechnology Products CDER/FDA
Control strategy and validation Emanuela Lacana PhD Office of Biotechnology Products CDER/FDA 1 Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the speaker and should not
More informationRegulatory Expectations for Method Transfers: Health Canada's Perspective CMC Strategy Forum Methods on the move January 23, 2017
Regulatory Expectations for Method Transfers: Health Canada's Perspective CMC Strategy Forum Methods on the move January 23, 2017 Hugo Hamel, Senior Biologist/Evaluator, BGTD Overview of the Post-NOC Changes
More informationStrategies for IND Filing Success: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls
Strategies for IND Filing Success: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls October 21, 2016 Presented by: Sharon Ayd, Ph.D., MBA Chief Scientific Officer and SVP, Pharmaceuticals document contains proprietary
More informationGuidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Cooperative Manufacturing Arrangements for Licensed Biologics Additional copies of this guidance are available from the Office of Communication, Training and Manufacturers Assistance
More informationBiotechnology Industry Organization 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006
Biotechnology Industry Organization 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006 December 4, 2003 Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061 Rockville,
More informationOctober 10, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852
October 10, 2017 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Re: Docket No. FDA 2017 D 2802: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls
More informationRegulatory Issues and Drug Product Approval for Biopharmaceuticals
Regulatory Issues and Drug Product Approval for Biopharmaceuticals Vinod P. Shah, Ph. D. FIP Scientific Secretary Biotech 2007 Southern African Regional and International Regulatory Biotechnology Workshop
More informationExamples of regulatory expectations for analytical characterization and testing
Examples of regulatory expectations for analytical characterization and testing AT Europe 2016, 18 March 2016 Vicki Venizelos Quality RA B.V. Leiden, the Netherlands Overview What are the regulatory expectations?
More informationPhase-Appropriate Analytical Method Validation: A Regulator s Perspective
Phase-Appropriate Analytical Method Validation: A Regulator s Perspective Jayda Siggers, PhD Biologist/Scientific Evaluator, Cytokines Division Centre for Evaluation of Radiopharmaceuticals and Biotherapeutics
More informationWhile the recognition
Designing the Perfect Change Control System Change control systems today are expected to be designed in a way that provides a system to not only document and approve changes, but also to anticipate change
More informationABB Industries PAT Validation
Alison Harrington ABB Industries PAT Validation ABB Industries - 1 - Topics PAT disciplines and framework FDA evolution PAT Regulatory Process Quality System Comparability Protocol Submission example Validation
More informationGuidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Cooperative Manufacturing Arrangements for Licensed Biologics DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions regarding
More informationExperience with Health Canada s Approach for Post-Approval Changes. Kiran Krishnan Vice President US Regulatory Affairs September 2014
Experience with Health Canada s Approach for Post-Approval Changes Kiran Krishnan Vice President US Regulatory Affairs September 2014 Important Quotes to consider Dr. Janet Woodcock on desired state: A
More informationRegulation of Microbiota- Based Products
Regulation of Microbiota- Based Products LCDR Matthew Steele, PhD Team Leader, Regulatory Review Branch 1 Division of Vaccines and Related Products Applications CBER/OVRR My presentation is an informal
More informationTECHNICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Q12
INTERNATIONAL CONCIL FOR HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED GUIDELINE TECHNICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT LIFECYCLE
More informationComparability Studies for Autologous Cell Therapy Products. Chris Shen July, 2017
Comparability Studies for Autologous Cell Therapy Products Chris Shen July, 2017 Forward Looking Statements/Safe Harbor To the extent statements contained in this presentation are not descriptions of historical
More informationCopyright. Jeremiah J. Kelly (2015). All rights reserved. Further dissemination without express written consent strictly prohibited.
Statutory Framework for Biologics Drugs Investigational Use Application IND Pre-Market Approval Applications 505(b)(1) NDA 505(b)(2) NDA 505(j) ANDA Over-the-Counter (OTC) Non- Rx Drugs Monograph Biologics
More informationChanges to a Potency Bioassay for Biotechnology Products: a Regulatory Perspective Kathleen A. Clouse, Ph.D., Director Division of Monoclonal Antibodi
Changes to a Potency Bioassay for Biotechnology Products: a Regulatory Perspective Kathleen A. Clouse, Ph.D., Director Division of Monoclonal Antibodies Office of Biotechnology Products Center for Drug
More informationTECHNICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Q12
INTERNATIONAL CONCIL FOR HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE ICH HARMONISED GUIDELINE TECHNICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT LIFECYCLE
More informationDrug Product Comparability: Using Process and Product Knowledge for Successful Comparability Exercises
Drug Product Comparability: Using Process and Product Knowledge for Successful Comparability Exercises Jamie Moore Head, Late Stage Pharmaceutical Development CMC Strategy Forum July 18-19, 2016 Many Reasons
More informationScientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product. Guidance for Industry
Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product Guidance for Industry U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation
More informationPost Approval Change Management Protocols/Comparability Protocols (PACMPs/CPs) Current and Future State
Post Approval Change Management Protocols/Comparability Protocols (PACMPs/CPs) Current and Future State AAPS 2017 AM Sunrise Session Pramod Kotwal, Ph.D. Global Reg. Affairs Clinical Safety- CMC Policy
More informationPPQ-to-Approval Timelines Acceleration Approaches at BMS
PPQ-to-Approval Timelines Acceleration Approaches at BMS Marcus Boyer Bristol-Myers Squibb Associate Director Process Life-cycle Management Syracuse, NY USA Kristen Manchester Bristol-Myers Squibb Sr.
More informationANALYTICAL VALIDATION CHALLENGES DURING THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT OF KEYTRUDA
ANALYTICAL VALIDATION CHALLENGES DURING THE RAPID DEVELOPMENT OF KEYTRUDA January 29, 2018 CMC Strategy Forum Industry Considerations for Phase-Appropriate Method Validations Athena Nagi Abstract and Outline
More informationICH guideline Q12 on technical and regulatory considerations for pharmaceutical product lifecycle management
1 2 3 14 December 2017 EMA/CHMP/ICH/804273/2017 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use 4 5 6 7 ICH guideline Q12 on technical and regulatory considerations for pharmaceutical product lifecycle
More informationCC: Richard Levy, PDA; Denyse Baker, PDA
Bethesda Towers 4350 East West Highway Suite 150 Bethesda, MD 20814 USA Tel: +1 (301) 656-5900 Fax: +1 (301) 986-0296 www.pda.org OFFICERS Chair Harold Baseman ValSource Chair-Elect Martin VanTrieste Amgen
More informationValidation of Analytical Methods used for the Characterization, Physicochemical and Functional Analysis and of Biopharmaceuticals.
Validation of Analytical Methods used for the Characterization, Physicochemical and Functional Analysis and of Biopharmaceuticals. 1 Analytical Method Validation: 1..1 Philosophy: Method validation is
More informationPhase Appropriate Method Validation
Phase Appropriate Method Validation Aryo Nikopour Irvine, California January 12, 2017 The Southern California Pharmaceutical Discussion Group (SCPDG) of AAPS OUTLINE What is Validation Guidelines Method
More informationUS FDA: CMC Issues for INDs
ISBTC Global Regulatory Summit October 29, 2008 US FDA: CMC Issues for INDs Keith Wonnacott, Ph.D. keith.wonnacott@fda.hhs.gov US Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
More informationPDA & West Present: Combination Products Combination Product Hot Topics: Post Approval Device Changes and the New EU MDR Article 117 Requirements
PDA & West Present: Combination Products Combination Product Hot Topics: Post Approval Device Changes and the New EU MDR Article 117 Requirements Doug Mead, Sr. Director, CMC RA, Devices and Combination
More informationAncillary Materials for Cell & Tissue Therapies Definitions, US Regulatory Approach, and USP s Risk-Tiered Approach
USP/ISCT Workshop 2012 Seattle, WA, USA Ancillary Materials for Cell & Tissue Therapies Definitions, US Regulatory Approach, and USP s Risk-Tiered Approach Elizabeth Read, MD Head of Product Development
More informationICH Q12 Perspectives: The Robust PQS
ICH Q12 Perspectives: The Robust PQS PQRI October 5 th, 2015 Mahesh Ramanadham, Pharm.D./MBA Branch Chief, Inspection Assessment Branch 2 Division of Inspection Assessment Office of Process and Facilities
More informationDivision of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, rm Rockville, MD 20852
Reference No.: FDAA10017 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 VIA WEB SUBJECT: Approval Pathway for Biosimilar and Interchangeable
More informationSynopsis: FDA Process Validation Guidance
Synopsis: FDA Process Validation Guidance This synopsis is a comparison of the draft version 2008 and the final version 2011 of the U.S. FDA Guidance Process Validation: General Principles and Practices.
More informationRegulatory considerations for manufacturing and testing of investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products
Regulatory considerations for manufacturing and testing of investigational chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products Xiaobin Victor Lu Product Reviewer Gene Therapies Branch DCGT/OCTGT/CBER/FDA MEASUREMENT
More informationOctober 10, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm Rockville, MD 20852
October 10, 2017 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Re: Docket No. FDA 2017 D 2802: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls
More informationPost-approval Change Management Protocols - Current Status and Next Steps on the Way towards a Global Tool
Post-approval Change Management Protocols - Current Status and Next Steps on the Way towards a Global Tool Dr. Markus Goese Lead EU CMC Regulatory Policy F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel - Switzerland Presentation
More informationThe Device Side of Combination Products
The Device Side of Combination Products Technical and Regulatory Challenges in Life Cycle Management Bob Laughner Associate Director, Combination Products 04 May 2016 What are combination products? Combination
More informationNew and Revised Draft Q&As on Biosimilar Development and the BPCI Act (Revision 2)
New and Revised Draft Q&As on Biosimilar Development and the BPCI Act (Revision 2) Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and
More informationA Life Cycle Approach to Raw Material Qualification for Cell and Gene Therapy Products
A Life Cycle Approach to Raw Material Qualification for Cell and Gene Therapy Products Angela Whatley, Ph.D. Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies CBER/FDA CMC Strategy Forum on Cell & Gene Therapies
More informationCurrent Hotspots during CMC Evaluation a European Regulatory Perspective
www.pei.de Current Hotspots during CMC Evaluation a European Regulatory Perspective CMC Strategy Forum Japan 2018 3-4 December, Tokyo Steffen Gross, Head Section monoclonal - and polyclonal Antibodies
More informationAutomating HPLC and GC Analytical Method Validation Fusion AE Software Program White Paper
Automating HPLC and GC Analytical Method Validation Fusion AE Software Program White Paper Varian, Inc. 2700 Mitchell Drive Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA www.varianinc.com Introduction Chromatographic
More informationThe Deemed to be a License Provision of the BPCI Act Questions and Answers Guidance for Industry
The Deemed to be a License Provision of the BPCI Act Questions and Answers Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only. Comments and suggestions
More informationPractical challenges in the CMC development of biosimilars. Simon Hotchin Executive Director Regulatory Affairs Amgen Inc.
Practical challenges in the CMC development of biosimilars Simon Hotchin Executive Director Regulatory Affairs Amgen Inc. Overview Introduction Statistical methodologies in the assessment of analytical
More informationHow to Avoid Common Deficiencies in INDs and NDAs. Ramesh Raghavachari, Ph.D. Branch Chief, Branch IX ONDQA/OPS/CDER
How to Avoid Common Deficiencies in INDs and NDAs Ramesh Raghavachari, Ph.D. Branch Chief, Branch IX ONDQA/OPS/CDER 1 Structure of FDA Office of Commissioner Chief Scientist FOODS Medical Products & Tobacco
More informationAutomating HPLC and GC Analytical Method Validation Fusion AE Software Program White Paper
Automating HPLC and GC Analytical Method Validation Fusion AE Software Program White Paper S-Matrix Corporation 1594 Myrtle Avenue Eureka, CA 95501, USA www.smatrix.com Introduction Chromatographic analytical
More informationPh. Eur. monographs and biosimilars
Ph. Eur. monographs and biosimilars Emmanuelle Charton, Ph. D. European Pharmacopoeia Department European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare 1 Place of the Ph. Eur. within the EU regulatory
More informationQuestion-based Review (QbR)
Question-based Review (QbR) Rebecca L. Owen, Ph.D. Team Leader, Feed/Topical Team Division of Manufacturing Technologies ONADE/CVM/FDA Outline Background on CMC Filing Requirements What is QbR? QbR at
More informationGuidance for Industry
Reprinted from FDA s website by Guidance for Industry Scientific Considerations in Demonstrating Biosimilarity to a Reference Product DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment
More informationQUALITY AGREEMENT. The following Agreement has been concluded between
QUALITY AGREEMENT The following Agreement has been concluded between LLC LABORATORIES The contract laboratory and service provider 1625 Trinity Dr., Unit 11 Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5T 1W9 Hereinafter
More informationEuropean Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use
European Medicines Agency Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use London, 22 February 2006 EMEA/CHMP/BWP/49348/2005 COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON SIMILAR BIOLOGICAL MEDICINAL
More informationLinking Regulatory Commitments to Post Approval Changes Robert Iser
Linking Regulatory Commitments to Post Approval Changes Robert Iser Senior Scientific Advisor (acting) Office of Process & Facilities / OPQ / CDER IFPAC 2015 Product Lifecycle and QA January 27 th, 2015
More informationCase Study on Application of Analytical Life Cycle Management and Risk Management
Case Study on Application of Analytical Life Cycle Management and Risk Management Jianmei, Ph.D. Genzyme, a Sanofi Company AAPS 2015 Dione Pompe disease Brazil www.genzyme.com Outline Introduction of Concepts
More informationRegulatory Approval of Modern Gene-Based Cancer Immunotherapies CAR T Cells A product perspective
Regulatory Approval of Modern Gene-Based Cancer Immunotherapies CAR T Cells A product perspective ASQ509 Biomed/Biotech SIG 2/1/18 Xiaobin Victor Lu Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies Office of Tissues
More informationScientific and Regulatory Perspectives on Measuring Protein Aggregation of Biotechnology Products
Scientific and Regulatory Perspectives on Measuring Protein Aggregation of Biotechnology Products Ashutosh Rao, Ph.D. Chief, Laboratory of Applied Biochemistry Division of Biotechnology Review and Research
More informationUnderstanding the Characteristics and Establishing Acceptance Criteria for Analytical Methods Validation
Understanding the Characteristics and Establishing Acceptance Criteria for Analytical Methods Validation Ying Verdi IVT LAB WEEK EUROPE June 2017 Partners in Health Since 1919 Regulatory View of Method
More informationNotice Our file number:
June 15, 2015 Notice Our file number: 15-107053-353 Adoption of ICH 1 Guidance: Q5E: Comparability of Biotechnological/Biological Products Subject to Changes in Their Manufacturing Process Health Canada
More informationPROCESS VALIDATION ROCHAPON WACHAROTAYANKUN, PH.D.
Basic GMP Requirement PROCESS VALIDATION ROCHAPON WACHAROTAYANKUN, PH.D. Topic Process validation What and Why? Principle of process validation Manufacturing process validation Aseptic process validation
More informationDr. Earl Dye CMC/GMP Considerations for Expedited Development Programs
Dr. Earl Dye CMC/GMP Considerations for Expedited Development Programs Earl Dye is Director of Technical Regulatory Policy in Genentech s Washington, DC Regulatory Affairs Office, and is the FDA Liaison
More informationValidation, Verification and Transfer of Analytical Methods (Understanding and implementing guidelines from FDA/EMA, USP and ICH)
Validation, Verification and Transfer of Analytical Methods (Understanding and implementing guidelines from FDA/EMA, USP and ICH) *** LIMITED TIME OFFER: FREE $100 AMAZON GIFT CARD! *** REGISTER TODAY!
More informationIDE Submissions for Devices Used to Manufacture Cell Therapy Products
IDE Submissions for Devices Used to Manufacture Cell Therapy Products Janice Davis-Sproul, MAS Johns Hopkins Medicine 7 th Annual Somatic Cell Therapy Symposium 1 Overview Discuss an investigatorsponsored
More informationA FDA Product Reviewer s Perspective on Building A Quality Dossier
A FDA Product Reviewer s Perspective on Building A Quality Dossier CASSS Mid-West Discussion Group October 29, 2015 University Center of Lake County, Grayslake, IL Howard Anderson, PhD Team Lead Product
More informationCMC Considerations for 505(b)(2) Applications. Monica Cooper, Ph.D. FDA/CDER/OPS/ONDQA AAPS Annual Meeting Washington, D.C.
CMC Considerations for 505(b)(2) Applications Monica Cooper, Ph.D. FDA/CDER/OPS/ONDQA AAPS Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. October 2011 1 Introduction Outline Brief overview of FDA drug approval pathways
More informationFDA Guidance and Current Experience with New Drug Submissions
FDA Guidance and Current Experience with New Drug Submissions Danae Christodoulou, Ph.D. CDER/OPQ Office of New Drug Products This presentation reflects the views of the author and should not be construed
More informationValidation of Thin Layer Chromatographic Procedures
Validation of Thin Layer Chromatographic Procedures International Symposium for High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography HPTLC 2011 July 7th, 2011, Basle Topics ICH Q2(R1) and nothing else? Other guidance
More informationCMC Strategy Forum, Paris 2008
Assay Validation Studies in Clinical Development: Regulatory Perspective CMC Strategy Forum, Paris 2008,, Germany 1 Scope Biologicals PEI Analytical Validation Not: Process Validation Investigational products
More informationIntroduction to CMC Regulatory Affairs
Introduction to CMC Regulatory Affairs Bharathi Mamidipudi Regulatory Affairs Consultant II Syner-G Pharma Consulting, LLC Northeastern University, Boston November 10, 2016 My Background Experience ~4
More informationFDA recommendations for comparability studies to support manufacturing changes. Joslyn Brunelle, PhD Office of Biotechnology Products OPQ/CDER/FDA
FDA recommendations for comparability studies to support manufacturing changes Joslyn Brunelle, PhD Office of Biotechnology Products OPQ/CDER/FDA The views and opinions expressed here should not be used
More informationPerspectives on Method Validation: Importance of Adequate Method Validation
Perspectives on Method Validation: Importance of Adequate Method Validation Heather Bridwell, Vikas Dhingra, Daniel Peckman, Jennifer Roark and Thomas Lehman The appropriate validation of analytical methods
More informationIND - Cell Therapy. Robert W. Lindblad, MD, FACEP. Where Did you Hear
IND - Cell Therapy Robert W. Lindblad, MD, FACEP Where Did you Hear The EMMES Corporation CRO Coordinating Center Cell Therapy PACT Production Assistance for Cellular Therapy Bone Marrow Transplant Network
More informationEuropean Regulatory Experiences and Expectations of HCP Analysis and Control
HCP Strategy Forum, Washington DC, January 26, 2015 www.pei.de European Regulatory Experiences and Expectations of HCP Analysis and Control Blood Products: Dr. Erika Friedl, PEI (DE) Discalimer: The views
More informationGuideline for the quality, safety and efficacy of follow-on biological medicinal products
Guideline for the quality, safety and efficacy of follow-on biological medicinal products 1. Introduction A follow-on biological medicinal product (hereinafter referred to as FOBMP) is considered as a
More informationGuidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Process Validation: General Principles and Practices U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) Center
More informationQuality (or CMC) Enablers for Efficient/Effective Drug Product Lifecycle Management FDA s Perspective
Quality (or CMC) Enablers for Efficient/Effective Drug Product Lifecycle Management FDA s Perspective Susan Rosencrance, Ph.D. Director, Office of Lifecycle Drug Products Office of Pharmaceutical Quality/CDER/FDA
More informationStructure and Mandate of FDA
Structure and Mandate of FDA Leonard Sacks, M.D. Office of Medical Policy Center for Drug Evaluation and Research FDA FDA Clinical Investigator Training Course November 13, 2018 Mission of regulatory agencies
More informationChanges without Prior Approval
Changes without Prior Approval Breakout Session Summary Rick Smith Aventis Pasteur, Inc. Issues Discussed Risk Analysis for Post Approval Changes Comparability Protocols Development Reports Other Risk-Based
More informationRegulatory Review Considerations of Drug-Linker Quality in ADCs
Regulatory Review Considerations of Drug-Linker Quality in ADCs Xiao Hong Chen, Ph.D. Acting Quality Assessment Lead Division of New Drug Products I, Branch II ONDP/OPQ/CDER/FDA Outlines ADC IND submissions
More informationRegulatory Updates for Biopharmaceutical Products:FDA Perspective
Regulatory Updates for Biopharmaceutical Products:FDA Perspective CMC Strategy Forum Europe 2016 Sarah Kennett Division of Biotechnology Review and Research I Office of Biotechnology Products OPQ,CDER,
More informationEarly Development Best Practices for Stability- Regulatory Perspective
Early Development Best Practices for Stability- Regulatory Perspective IQ Workshop, Feb. 4-5, 2014, Washington, D.C. Ramesh Sood, Ph.D. Division Director (Acting) Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
More informationData Integrity Prioritization and Gap Analysis to Prove Data Integrity
Data Integrity Prioritization and Gap Analysis to Prove Data Integrity Oct 9 th 2018 Speakers Alex Brindle Principal Consultant with DPS. Alex holds a B.Sc. in Chemistry, a M.Sc. in Analytical Science
More informationChanges to an Approved Application: Biological Products: Human Blood and Blood Components Intended for Transfusion or for Further Manufacture
Reprinted from FDA s website by EAS Consulting Group, LLC Changes to an Approved Application: Biological Products: Human Blood and Blood Components Intended for Transfusion or for Further Manufacture Guidance
More informationA Potential Innovative CMC Solution: Responding To Public Health Needs With An Accelerated Clinical Pathway A Vaccine Example
A Potential Innovative CMC Solution: Responding To Public Health Needs With An Accelerated Clinical Pathway A Vaccine Example January 2018 Natalie A. Christian Integrated Development and Supply Team Lead
More informationRe: Docket No. FDA-2017-D-5525: Statistical Approaches to Evaluate Analytical Similarity
November 21 st, 2017 Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Re: Docket No. FDA-2017-D-5525: Statistical Approaches to Evaluate
More informationKirsten L. Vadheim, Ph.D. BioCompliance Consulting, Inc. Presented at the ASBM Forum, February 25, 2014, Washington DC
Kirsten L. Vadheim, Ph.D. BioCompliance Consulting, Inc. Presented at the ASBM Forum, February 25, 2014, Washington DC klvadheim@hotmail.com The Importance of Data Over Time 2003: FDA approved innovator
More informationCMC Writing for IND Applications. David H. McKenna, Jr., M.D. University of Minnesota PACT Web Seminar II July 14, 2005
CMC Writing for IND Applications David H. McKenna, Jr., M.D. University of Minnesota PACT Web Seminar II July 14, 2005 CMC Writing for IND Applications ~Outline~ What is the CMC section? Who writes the
More informationGuidelines on procedures and data requirements for changes to approved biotherapeutic products
ENGLISH ONLY EXPERT COMMITTEE ON BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION Geneva, 17 to 20 October 2017 Guidelines on procedures and data requirements for changes to approved biotherapeutic products World Health Organization
More informationCMC Considerations for Manufacturing of CAR T-Cell Product
CMC Considerations for Manufacturing of CAR T-Cell Product November 14, 2017 Joann M. Parker, R.Ph, M.S. Regulatory Global CMC; Pfizer Inc Session: New Modalities for Cancer Moonshot: Unique Regulatory,
More informationEffective Management and Operations of GXP Laboratories
Effective Management and Operations of GXP Laboratories Course Objective: Upon completion of this course, attendees involved in establishing and assuring that Good Laboratory / Good Manufacturing Practice
More informationGuideline for the Quality, Safety, and Efficacy Assurance of Follow-on Biologics
Provisional Translation (as of April 19, 2013) PFSB/ELD Notification No. 0304007 March 4, 2009 To: Prefectural Health Department (Bureau) From: Evaluation and Licensing Division, Pharmaceutical and Food
More information