DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 Carrier Drive Toronto, ON

Transcription

1 385 The West Mall Toronto, ON, M9C 1E Peritus File # February 28, 2018 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 Carrier Drive Toronto, ON Prepared for: FCAPX ONTARIO LTD. 385 The West Mall, Suite 401 Toronto, ON M9C 1E7 Naz Ritchie, M.Eng., P.Eng., QPESA General Manager Breslau Toronto Ottawa Vancouver A C3 Group Company

2 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, Executive Summary Peritus Environmental Consultants Inc. (Peritus) was retained by FCAPX Ontario Ltd. to complete a designated substances survey (DSS) for the building located at 30 Carrier Drive, in Toronto, ON (Site). Currently, the Site is owned by the Christian Missionary and Alliance in Canada. Of the 42 samples that were submitted for asbestos analysis, two of the samples contained asbestos. Area of Building Location Asbestos Detected (Yes/No) Percent Asbestos (%) Type of Asbestos Estimated Area of ACMs North stairwell Acoustic ceiling tiles Yes 1% Chrysotile 4% Amosite 150 ft 2 (14 m 2 ) Various locations inside the building Drywall joint compound on gypsum walls Yes 1% Chrysotile Assumed to extend to all drywall joint compound throughout the building. Estimated quantity is assumed to be twice the square foot of the building (Approximately 20,000 to 25,000 ft 2 ) The materials appear to be non-friable and can remain in place at this time. If the materials are disturbed as part of a future renovation or demolition, then they should be handled as asbestos waste and a qualified contractor should be retained to remove and dispose of the materials appropriately. Four paint samples were submitted for lead analysis. The analytical results indicated that the lead concentrations were non-detect (below the method detection limit). Several fluorescent light bulbs were identified throughout the building which may potentially contain small quantities of mercury. If these are replaced in the future, the light bulbs should be handled and disposed appropriately. Several fluorescent light ballasts were identified throughout the building that may potentially contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). If these are replaced in the future, then they should be handled and disposed appropriately. Current Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change policies will allow an on-time disposal of up to 40 ballasts as municipal waste. For quantities greater than 40, the ballasts must be classified as PCB waste and either placed into temporary storage or disposed of at an acceptable facility. Disposal of large quantities of light bulbs or ballasts must be completed using a qualified contractor. Page i

3 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary... i 2 Introduction Building Description Survey Scope Regulatory Requirements Limitations and Exclusions regarding Scope Background Information on Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Methodology Methodology Analysis Survey Limitations Findings Asbestos Sprayed or Trowelled Fireproofing or Thermal Insulation Mechanical Insulation Texture Finishes Acoustic Ceiling Tiles Vinyl Sheet Flooring Vinyl Floor Tiles Asbestos Cement Products Drywall Joint Compound Hard Plaster Mastic and Other Adhesives Caulking Lead Mercury Silica Isocyanates Vinyl Chloride Monomer Benzene Acrylonitrile Coke Oven Emissions Arsenic Ethylene oxide Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Ozone-Depleting Substances Urea-Formaldehyde Foam Insulation Discussion Asbestos Lead Mercury Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBS) Page ii

4 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, Silica Limitations References Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials: Regulatory Requirements and Guidelines... 1 Asbestos... 1 Lead 1 Mercury... 2 Silica 2 Isocyanates... 3 Vinyl Chloride Monomer... 3 Benzene... 4 Acrylonitrile... 4 Coke Oven Emissions... 4 Arsenic... 4 Ethylene Oxide... 5 Polychlorinated Biphenyls... 5 Ozone-Depleting Substances... 6 Urea-Formaldehyde Foam Insulation... 6 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 First Floor, 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, ON Second Floor, 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, ON Roof, 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, ON PHOTOLOG Photo 1 Onsite Building looking northwest Photo 2 Grey Caulking on Roof Photo 3 Typical Black Mastic on the Roof Photo 4 HVAC System on Roof Photo 5 Plaster Texture Coat on Wall: Western Stairwell Photo 6 Mastic behind Vinyl Floor Baseboard: Western Stairwell Photo 7 Unit 201: Second Floor Photo 8 Typical Sampling Location of Drywall Joint Compound and Paint Samples Photo 9 Typical 2 x4 Ceiling Tiles found within Building Photo 10 Unit 203: Classroom Photo 11 Ceiling Tiles in Unit 203 Photo 12 View above Ceiling Tiles Photo 13 North Stairwell Photo 14 Acoustic Ceiling Tiles in North Stairwell Photo 15 Typical 12 x12 Floor Tiles within Building Page iii

5 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, 2018 Photo 16 Photo 17 Photo 18 Photo 19 Typical 12 x12 Floor Tiles within Building Piping for Water Heater in Basement Typical Fluorescent Lighting Typical Thermostat located throughout the Building APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Regulatory Requirements and Guidelines: Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Certificates of Analysis (Paracel Laboratory) Page iv

6 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, Introduction Peritus Environmental Consultants Inc. (Peritus) was retained by FCAPX Ontario Ltd. to complete a designated substances survey (DSS) for the building located at 30 Carrier Drive, in Toronto, ON (Site). Currently, the Site is owned by the Christian Missionary and Alliance in Canada. This report consists of the Introduction section which includes a description of the building, scope of survey and the regulations; Background on Designated Substances and Hazardous Material; Survey Methodology; Findings; Discussion and Limitations of the report. 2.1 BUILDING DESCRIPTION The Site has a two-storey commercial building with a basement. The building was constructed in There are no elevators at the Site. The building is surrounded by asphalt parking lots. 2.2 SURVEY SCOPE The scope of work for the DSS focused on identifying potential designated substances and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Section 30 of the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) requires that the following designated substances be included in a DSS: Acrylonitrile Coke Oven Emissions Mercury Arsenic Ethylene Oxide Silica Asbestos Isocyanates Vinyl Chloride Monomer Benzene Lead Specific materials of concern that may potentially be encountered in the subject buildings include asbestos, lead, silica and mercury. 2.3 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS Section 30 of OHSA requires building owners or their agents (architects, general contractors, etc.) to prepare or have prepared a DSS for specified potentially hazardous materials possibly present in a facility. The owner must ensure that a prospective contractor has received a DSS report before entering into a binding contract with the contractor. The owner is liable to the contractor for damages and costs arising from unreported materials (of which the owner should reasonably have been aware) and could also be subject to orders and fines from the Ministry of Labour (MOL). In addition to the requirements under the OHSA, Section 6 of the MOL Regulations for Construction Projects requires the contractor, when submitting a Notice of Project form, to report any designated substances likely to be used, handled or disturbed during the project. The disturbance of asbestos materials on construction projects is controlled by MOL Ontario Regulation, as amended (O.Reg.278/05). The disposal of asbestos waste is controlled by Page 1

7 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, 2018 Ministry of Environment O.Reg.347/09, as amended. PCBs are not a designated substance under OHSA; however, waste management and transfer of PCBs are controlled by Waste Management PCBs O.Reg.362/90, as amended, made under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA). There are no specific MOL regulations for control of the other designated substances on construction projects; however, the MOL actively enforces the general duty clause of OHSA which protects workers and provides guidance on exposure monitoring, permissible exposure levels, medical monitoring, etc. for all designated substances. 2.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCLUSIONS REGARDING SCOPE The scope of the report was limited to possible designated substances found within specified and accessible areas. Only areas that were accessible using non-destructive techniques were used in this DSS. This survey did not focus on current or past use of the property or occupant articles within the buildings (i.e. furniture or stock items), nor does it report on possible contaminants in the soil and groundwater at the Site. Page 2

8 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, Background Information on Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials OHSA requires that a list of all designated substances at a site be provided to all bidders at the tendering stage and that the Constructor for a project shall provide a copy of the list to each prospective contractor and subcontractor before entering into a contract. Eleven substances are classified as designated substances in Ontario: asbestos, lead, mercury, silica, isocyanates, vinyl chloride, benzene, acrylonitrile, coke oven emissions, arsenic and ethylene oxide. PCBs are considered to be hazardous materials and require special handling during construction or demolition activities. Legal requirements, which apply to health and safety on construction projects, are set out in OHSA and regulations made under the Act. OHSA specifies, in general terms, the duties of employers and others to protect workers from health and safety hazards on the job. These duties include taking all reasonable precautions to protect the health and safety of workers and acquainting a worker or a person in authority over a worker with any hazard in the work and in the handling, storage, use, disposal and transport of any hazardous materials. The Regulation for Construction Projects, O.Reg.213/91 (amended to O.Reg.88/13), applies to all construction projects, and requires the use of appropriate personal protective equipment, training in the use or protective equipment and the provision of adequate washing facilities. Other regulatory requirements (and guidelines) which apply to control of exposure to designated substances and hazardous materials are discussed in Appendix A. Page 3

9 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, Survey Methodology 4.1 METHODOLOGY A review of the Site history indicated that the building was constructed in 1975; therefore, the designated substances outlined in Section 30 of the OHSA (i.e. asbestos and lead) could potentially be present in the building. During the site visit, field personnel looked for the most common uses of building materials that could contain designated substances, based on historical applications including the use of lead in paint, and asbestos in insulation, floor tiles, ceiling tiles, and drywall. The DSS included a visual inspection of various rooms of the building, the roof and the basement. Field personnel collected samples of select building materials from the first and second floors and the roof (Refer to Figures 1, 2, and 3). Samples were not collected from the basement because the materials present were not suspected to contain asbestos or lead. Core sampling was not completed for the roof to avoid impacting the integrity of the roof. The survey focused on the following materials: Calking and mastics on the roof Window caulking Vinyl floor tiles Mastic adhesives Drywall and drywall joint compound within the walls and ceiling Plaster walls Acoustic ceiling tiles Insulation (vermiculite, asbestos, etc.) Pipe insulation Paint The field personnel visually inspected thermostats and fluorescent light bulbs for potential presence of mercury and switches and ballasts for potential presence of PCBs. 4.2 ANALYSIS The building was constructed prior to the 1980s; therefore, the use of designated substances in the building materials was a concern. During the site visit, field personnel collected 42 samples for asbestos analysis as well as 4 samples of paint suspected to contain lead. The locations of the samples are shown on Figures 1, 2 and 3 and the descriptions are provided in Section 5. Page 4

10 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, 2018 The asbestos and lead-in-paint samples were submitted to Paracel Laboratories Ltd. (Paracel) of Mississauga, Ontario. The analysis was performed in accordance with the MOE E3470, ICP- OES method. Certificates of Analyses are provided in Appendix B. 4.3 SURVEY LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for specific application to this Site. The findings cannot be extended to previous or future site conditions. The survey was limited to the materials discussed in this report. The field observations are considered sufficient in details and scope to form a reasonable basis for the findings presented in this report. Other areas that were not accessible for direct investigation and subsurface locations may contain designated substances or PCBs. Substances other than those addressed by the investigation described in this report may exist within the site; and substances addressed by the investigation may exist in areas of the site not investigated or in quantities not ascertained. Peritus warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein have been made in accordance with generally accepted evaluation methods in the industry and applicable regulations at the time of the performance of the survey. Page 5

11 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, Findings The findings of the survey are presented in separate subsections for each of the 11 designated substances and PCBs. Samples were collected from the first and second floors and the roof of the building. These samples were deemed to be representative of similar materials found on all floors. 5.1 ASBESTOS A total of 42 samples were submitted to Paracel for analysis of asbestos content. The analytical results indicated that there were two types of materials that contained asbestos. The other materials tested did not contain asbestos based on the analytical results. The asbestos results are summarized in Table 1 below: Sample ID Location Building Material Asbestos Content 01A, 01B, 01C Roof (west near HVAC unit R-22) (Photo 2) 02A Roof (west near HVAC unit R-22) (Photo 3) Caulking (grey) Mastic (black) None None 02B Roof (south central) Mastic (black) None 02C Roof (east near fan housing) Mastic (black) None 03A, 03B, 03C West Stairwell (three locations) (Photo 5) 04A, 04B, 04C West Stairwell (same location) (Photo 6) 05A 05B, 05C, 05D, 05E, 05F Unit 201 Gypsum Walls (Photo 8) Drywall Joint Compound throughout the building (Photo 8 and 10) 06A, 06B, 06C Unit 201: Ceiling Tile (Photo 9 and 11) 07A, 07B, 07C Unit 203: Ceiling Tile (Photo 9 and 11) 08A, 08B, 08C North Stairwell - Second Floor (Photo 13) 09A North Stairwell - Second Floor: Ceiling Tiles (Photo 14) 09B, 09C North Stairwell - Second Floor: Ceiling Tiles (Photo 14) Texture coat (white) Beige vinyl baseboards and mastic Beige Drywall Joint Compound Beige Drywall Joint Compound Beige Ceiling Tiles (2 ft x 4 ft) with random pinholes Beige Ceiling Tiles (2 ft x 4 ft) beige with random pinholes Beige Floor Tiles with grey flecks (12 ft x 12 ft) and mastic Beige ceiling Tiles (2 ft x 4 ft) with random pinholes Ceiling Tiles (2 ft x 4 ft) None None Yes Assumed to be yes. Not tested since 05A tested positive. None None None Yes Assumed to be yes. Not tested since 09A tested positive. Page 6

12 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, 2018 Sample ID Location Building Material Asbestos Content 10A, 10B, 10C Main Floor Storage Room (Sick Rm + Copy Rm) (Photo 15, 16) Beige Floor Tiles with beige flecks (12 ft x 12 ft) and mastic 11A, 11B, 11C Server Room (Photo 15, 16) Off-white vinyl floor tile with blue flecks (12 ft x 12 ft) and mastic 12A, 12B, 12C First Floor: Vault Room, IT Room, and Large Storage Room (Photo 15, 16) 13A, 13B, 13C Exterior of Building: Façade and Exterior (Photo 1) Beige floor tiles (12 ft x 12 ft) with black flecks Brown Caulking from Windows, Doors, and Expansion Joints None None None None Sprayed or Trowelled Fireproofing or Thermal Insulation Sprayed on thermal insulation was not observed in the areas of the building that were visually inspected Mechanical Insulation Most of the pipes were not insulated (See Photo 12, 17 and 18). Mechanical insulation observed on the roof was composed of fibre glass and was in good repair at the time of the survey Texture Finishes Textured plaster finish was observed on the walls of the west stairs as shown on Photos 5 and 6. Three samples were collected from the walls in this area. Analytical results indicated that the material did not contain asbestos Acoustic Ceiling Tiles Acoustic ceiling tiles were observed throughout the building in 2 ft x 2 ft panels and 2 ft x 4 ft panels. Many of the ceiling tiles included date codes which confirmed that they were non-acm. Photos 9 and 11 show typical 2 ft x 4 ft ceiling tiles that were located throughout the majority of the building. The ceiling tiles in the north stairwell area (as shown on Photo 14) was older than the rest of the building. Analytical results indicated that these ceiling tiles contained asbestos as summarized below. Area of Building Location Asbestos Detected (Yes/No) Percent Asbestos (%) Type of Asbestos Estimated Area of ACMs North stairwell Acoustic ceiling tiles Yes 1% Chrysotile 4% Amosite 150 ft 2 (14 m 2 ) Page 7

13 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, Vinyl Sheet Flooring No vinyl sheet flooring was observed Vinyl Floor Tiles Field personnel observed several types of vinyl sheet flooring throughout the building. The tiles were typically 12 ft x 12 ft in size in various colours. Beige vinyl baseboards were present in the southwest stairwell (Photo 6). Beige floor tiles with grey flecks were present in the north stairwell (Photo 13). The main floor storage room had beige floor tiles with beige flecks while the server room had off-white floor tiles with blue flecks. Field personnel collected samples including the mastic from the various types of tiles. Analytical results indicated that none of the vinyl floor tiles or mastic contained asbestos Asbestos Cement Products No asbestos cement products were observed Drywall Joint Compound Triplicate samples were collected for drywall joint compound from several areas of the building. The locations of the samples are indicated as 05A to 05F as shown on Figures 1 and 2 and Photo 8. The analytical results for Sample 05A indicated the presence of asbestos as summarized below. Area of Building Various locations inside the building Building Material Drywall joint compound on gypsum walls Asbestos Detected (Yes/No) Percent Asbestos (%) Page 8 Type of Asbestos Yes 1% Chrysotile Estimated Area of ACMs Assumed to extend to all drywall joint compound throughout the building. Estimated quantity is assumed to be twice the square foot of the building (Approximately 20,000 to 25,000 ft 2 ) The positive stop option was used; therefore, Samples 05B to 05F were not analyzed since they were identified as ACM Hard Plaster Hard plaster was observed in the walls of the western stairwell as shown on Photo 5 with sampling locations shown on Figure 2. Analytical samples indicated that the plaster material does not contain asbestos Mastic and Other Adhesives Black mastic was observed in the exhaust vents on the roof as shown on Photo 3. Samples were collected from three different stacks with sampling locations shown on Figure 3. The results indicated that the materials do not contain asbestos.

14 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, 2018 Mastic adhesives were also present underneath the vinyl floor tiles and were analyzed as separate layers. The analytical results indicated that these materials did not contain asbestos Caulking Caulking was observed on the first and second floor windows, as well as along the HVAC units located on the roofs. Sampling locations are shown on Figure 1 (Sample ID 13A, 13B and 13C) and on Figure 3 (Sample ID 01A, 01B and 01C). Photos 1 and 2 show examples of the typical materials that were collected. The analytical results indicated that the caulking test do not contain asbestos. 5.2 LEAD Four paint samples were collected from the second floor of the building. The sampling locations are shown on Figures 1 and 2. The observations and results are summarized below. The analytical results indicated that the paint samples did not contain lead in detectable concentrations. Sample ID Location Building Materials Lead Result (µg/g) P-01 Unit 201: Second floor, northwest area Off-white paint <20 P-02 Second floor, hallway outside washroom area Off-white paint <20 P-03 North stairwell Cream paint on gypsum wall P-04 Main floor and second floor office area Beige Paint on Gypsum Walls <20 < MERCURY Fluorescent lighting was observed throughout the building (Photo 15). Mercury is typically present in fluorescent light tubes and HID lighting. An inspection of the bulbs confirmed they contain mercury. Based on the observations, it is likely mercury containing light bulbs are present throughout the building. The following light ballasts likely have fluorescent light bulbs containing mercury. Location Fluorescent Light Bulbs Unit 201: Second floor, northwest area 52 Main office area: First floor Over 200 First floor offices, corridor, and foyer 180 Vault room (IT and large storage room): First floor 60 Basement 8 The thermostats and switches in the building were a relatively new design and are unlikely to contain mercury (Photo 19). Page 9

15 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, SILICA Field personnel did not observe masonry walls during the site visit. If masonry walls are present behind the plaster walls, the concrete blocks, as well as the mortar used in the construction of these walls, it should be assumed to contain silica. Appropriate precautions should be taken by construction workers during demolition and disposal of masonry walls. 5.5 ISOCYANATES There was no indication that free isocyanates were used in the areas of the building that were inspected by field personnel. 5.6 VINYL CHLORIDE MONOMER There was no indication vinyl chloride monomers were used in the areas of the building that were inspected by field personnel. 5.7 BENZENE No sources of benzene were identified in the areas inspected during the building survey. 5.8 ACRYLONITRILE There was no indication that acrylonitrile was used in the inspected areas of the building. 5.9 COKE OVEN EMISSIONS There was no indication that coke oven emissions were associated with in the inspected areas of the building ARSENIC There was no indication that arsenic was used in the inspected areas of the building ETHYLENE OXIDE There was no indication that ethylene oxide was used in the inspected areas of the building POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) PCB based oil was historically used in lighting ballasts. Modern ballasts will specifically indicate on the label that they do not contain PCBs. As a conservative measure, unless light ballasts are specifically labelled as not containing PCBs, these should be assumed to contain PCBs and handled accordingly. Page 10

16 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, 2018 Field personnel identified the following fluorescent light ballasts: Location Fluorescent Light Ballasts Unit 201: Second floor, northwest area 26 Main office area: First floor Over First floor offices, corridor, and foyer 90 Vault Room (IT and Large Storage Room): First Floor 30 Basement OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCES Five HVAC units are located on the roof of the building including air conditioning units R-22 and R-410. These units likely contain ozone depleting substances UREA-FORMALDEHYDE FOAM INSULATION There was no indication that urea formaldehyde foam insulation was used in the inspected areas of the building. Page 11

17 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, Discussion 6.1 ASBESTOS Of the 42 samples that were submitted for asbestos analysis, two of the samples contained asbestos. Area of Building Location Asbestos Detected (Yes/No) Percent Asbestos (%) Type of Asbestos Estimated Area of ACMs North Stairwell Acoustic Ceiling Tiles Yes 1% Chrysotile 4% Amosite 150 ft 2 (14 m 2 ) Various locations inside the building Drywall joint compound on gypsum walls Yes 1% Chrysotile Assumed to extend to all drywall joint compound throughout the building. Estimated quantity is assumed to be twice the square foot of the building (Approximately 20,000 to 25,000 ft 2 ) The materials appear to be non-friable and can remain in place at this time. If the materials are disturbed as part of future renovation or demolition, then they should be handled as asbestos waste and a qualified contractor should be retained to remove and dispose of the materials appropriately. 6.2 LEAD Four paint samples were submitted for lead analysis. The analytical results indicated that the lead concentrations were non-detect (below the method detection limit). 6.3 MERCURY Fluorescent light bulbs contain small quantities of mercury. As summarized in Section 5.3, several fluorescent light bulbs were identified throughout the building which may potentially contain small quantities of mercury. If these are replaced in the future, the light bulbs should be handled and disposed appropriately. 6.4 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBS) As summarized in Section 5.12, several fluorescent light ballasts were identified throughout the building that may potentially contain PCBs. If these are replaced in the future, then they should be handled and disposed Current Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change policies will allow an on-time disposal of up to 40 ballasts as municipal waste. For quantities greater than 40, the ballasts must be classified as PCB waste and either placed into temporary storage or disposed of at an acceptable Page 12

18 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, 2018 facility. Disposal of large quantities of light bulbs or ballasts must be completed using a qualified contractor. 6.5 SILICA As discussed in Section 5.4, field personnel did not observe masonry walls during the site visit. If there are masonry walls present that were not apparent during the site visit, then appropriate measures must be taken if these walls are disturbed as part of future renovation or demolition. Any cutting, grinding or demolition of materials containing silica should be completed only with proper respiration protection and other worker-safe procedures such as adequate dust suppression technique (wetting). Page 13

19 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, Limitations This report was prepared for FCAPX Ontario Ltd and Humber College. The scope of services performed may not be appropriate for the purposes of other users, and any use or reuse of this document or its findings or recommendations represented herein is at the sole risk of any other user. Any use by a third party, of reports or documents authored by Peritus Environmental Consultants Inc., or any reliance by a third party on or decisions made by a third party based on the findings described in said documents, is the sole responsibility of such third parties. Peritus Environmental Consultants Inc. accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party because of decisions made or actions conducted. The quantities of Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials identified herein are estimates only. Contractors retained remove, handle or dispose of these materials must confirm these estimated quantities for their budgeting and planning purposes. Due to the nature of building construction, some limitations exist as to the possible thoroughness of a designated substances inventory. The field observations are considered sufficient in detail and scope to form a reasonable basis for the findings presented in this report. The scope of the survey is based on prior agreement with FCAPX Ontario Ltd. and the rationale given in this report. The building survey findings rely on professional interpretation of selective sampling and analysis. Sample analysis results have been applied to homogenous materials in locations not sampled; it was not within the scope of work to carry out an exhaustive sampling and analysis program. For non-accessible building spaces, the likelihood of the presence or absence of asbestos and other designated substances has been described, but such assessment is not a definitive statement of presence or absence. Peritus Environmental Consultants Inc. warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein have been made in accordance with generally accepted evaluation methods in the industry and applicable regulations at the time of the report. Peritus Environmental Consultants Inc. accepts responsibility for the competent performance of its duties in executing this assignment within the normal standards of the profession, but disclaims responsibility for consequential damages, if any. It is possible that conditions may exist which could not be reasonably identified within the scope of the survey or which were not apparent during field work. Peritus Environmental Consultants Inc. believes that the information collected during the survey is reliable. No other warranties are implied or expressed. PERITUS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC. Naz Ritchie, M.Eng., P.Eng., QPESA General Manager Page 14

20 DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES SURVEY 30 CARRIER DRIVE, TORONTO, ON February 28, References Ontario Health and Safety Act. Ontario Regulation 278/05 (O.Reg.278/05): Designated Substance Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations. Page 15

21 FIGURES

22 12-C 12-B 12-A 05-F P E SCALE: m 13-A 05-G 13-C 13-B PERITUS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC. Title: First Floor Revision Date: February 2018 Site: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, ON Project No.: Drawing Reference: Based on aerial photos and Peritus notes. Note: Locations of buildings, underground utilities etc. are for reference only and should not be referred to for detail design, excavation, or construction purposes. Customer: Figure: FCAPX Ontario Ltd. 1 n:\01 projects\toronto\carrier dr (30)\ dd\10 figures\1617 site.dwg, 1

23 P-01 P (A-C) 08-(A-C) 05-B P (A-C) 10-(A-C) 04-(A-C) 03-A 11-(A-C) 03-B 03-C 05-D P-04 SCALE: m 05-A Title: PERITUS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC. Second Floor Revision Date: February 2018 Site: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, ON Project No.: Drawing Reference: Based on aerial photos and Peritus notes. Note: Locations of buildings, underground utilities etc. are for reference only and should not be referred to for detail design, excavation, or construction purposes. Customer: Figure: FCAPX Ontario Ltd. 2 n:\01 projects\toronto\carrier dr (30)\ dd\10 figures\1617 site.dwg, 2

24 HATCH R410-A 02-C FAN HOUSING 02-A 01-(A-C) R B SCALE: m Title: Roof PERITUS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC. Revision Date: February 2018 Site: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, ON Project No.: Drawing Reference: Based on aerial photos and Peritus notes. Note: Locations of buildings, underground utilities etc. are for reference only and should not be referred to for detail design, excavation, or construction purposes. Customer: Figure: FCAPX Ontario Ltd. 3 n:\01 projects\toronto\carrier dr (30)\ dd\10 figures\1617 site.dwg, 3

25 PHOTO LOG

26 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 1 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Onsite building, looking northwest. PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 2 Date: February 16, 2018 Description: Grey caulking on the Roof

27 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 3 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Typical black mastic on the Roof PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 4 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: HVAC System on Roof

28 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 5 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Plaster Texture Coat on Wall: Western Stairwell PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 6 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Mastic behind Vinyl Floor Baseboard: Western Stairwell

29 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 7 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Unit 201: Second Floor PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 8 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Typical Sampling Location of Drywall Joint Compound and Paint Samples (along edge of window sill/walls)

30 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 9 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Typical 2 x4 ceiling tiles found within building. PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 10 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Unit 203: Classroom

31 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 11 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Ceiling Tiles in Unit 203 (Typical 2ft x 4 ft acoustic ceiling tiles) PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 12 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: View above Ceiling Tiles (HVAC Vents and Electrical Wiring)

32 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 13 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: North Stairwell (leading to the outside of Building) PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 14 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Acoustic Ceiling Tiles in North Stairwell

33 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 15 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Typical 12 x12 Floor Tiles within Building PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 16 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Typical 12 x12 Floor Tiles within Building

34 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 17 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Piping for Water Heater in Basement (Old (removed) boiler piping to outside the building) PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 18 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Typical Fluorescent Lighting (found within the Site building)

35 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Photo No: 19 Date: February 16, 2018 Site Location: 30 Carrier Drive, Toronto, Ontario Project Number: Description: Typical Thermostat located throughout the Building

36 APPENDIX A: REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES

37 APPENDIX A DESIGNATED SUBSTANCES AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES ASBESTOS Asbestos was widely used in building applications for its ability to withstand high temperatures and its resistance to chemical and biological breakdown. Asbestos may be present in friable or non-friable form. Friable means materials which can be crumbled, pulverized or powdered by hand pressure, when dry. Otherwise, the material is considered to be non-friable. Examples of friable asbestos containing materials (ACM) include pipe and tank insulation, sprayed-on fireproofing and acoustic texture material. Non-friable ACMs include floor tile, gaskets and cement board. Health concerns related to airborne friable asbestos fibers include the diseases such as asbestosis, mesothelioma and lung cancer. Friable ACMs were banned in Ontario in 1973 and non-friable ACMs were banned in the 1980s; however, asbestos based products were still in circulation and remained in use into the 1980s. Based on the age of the building, it is possible asbestos is present in the building materials used during construction. Provincial occupational health and safety requirements with respect to ACMs are contained within O.Reg.278/05 and 837 (amended to O.Reg.279/10). Disposal of asbestos waste is governed by the Environmental Protection Act R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 347 (amended to O.Reg.334/13). The Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act and Regulations prescribe additional requirements related to the transportation of asbestos waste. LEAD Lead is a heavy metal that can be found in construction materials such as paints, coatings, mortar, concrete, solder, packings, sheet metal, caulking, glazed ceramic products and cable splices. Lead has been used historically in exterior and interior paints. In Canada, the lead content of paints and other liquid coatings on furniture, household products, children s products and surface (exterior and interior) of any building frequented by children was restricted to 0.5% in Since no regulations exist in Ontario, the standards provided by the USA Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the EPA s Toxic Substances Control Act were used to compare the analytical data. These standards define lead-containing paint as paint that has lead equal to or exceeding 0.5 percent by weight [~5,000 parts per million (ppm)]. This criterion was widely, although not universally, used in Canada. In Canada, the Federal Hazardous Product Act has recently lowered the allowable concentration of lead in paints for new consumer products to 0.06% lead content by weight (600 ppm). Page A-1

38 APPENDIX A MERCURY Mercury has been used in electrical equipment such as alkaline batteries, fluorescent light bulbs (lamps), high intensity discharge (HID) lights (mercury vapour, high pressure sodium and metal halide), silent switches and in instruments such as thermometers, manometers and barometers, pressures gauges, float and level switches and flow meters. Mercury-containing lamps, the bulk of which are 1.22 m (4 foot) fluorescent lamps, contain between 7 mg and 40 mg of mercury each. Mercury compounds have also been used by many manufacturers historically as additives in latex paint to protect the paint from mildew and bacteria during production and storage. The intentional addition of mercury to Canadian-produced consumer paints for interior use was prohibited in Mercury may have remained in paints after 1991, as a result of impurities in the paint ingredients or cross-contamination due to other manufacturing processes. The Surface Coating Materials Regulations made under the Hazardous Products Act, published in the Canada Gazette Part II on May 4, 2005 sets a maximum total mercury concentration of 10 mg/kg (0.001 percent weight/weight) for all surface coating materials (including paint). Mercury-containing thermostats and silent light switches are mercury tilt switches which are small tubes with electrical contacts at one end of the tube. A mercury tilt switch is usually present when no switch is visible. Mercury switches often have the word TOP stamped on the upper end of the switch, which is visible after removing the cover plate. If mercury switches are to be removed, the entire switch should be removed and placed into a suitable container for storage and disposal. No special requirements exist in Ontario for disposal of small quantities (i.e., less than 30) of waste light tubes. Larger quantities of waste light tubes (more than 30) generated during renovations or building demolition and waste mercury from equipment must either be recycled or disposed of in accordance with the requirements of O.Reg.347 Waste Management, General. Waste mercury in amounts less than 5 kg (per month) are exempt from the generator registration requirements prescribed by O.Reg.347 Waste Management, General. Waste mercury from mercury switches or gauges should be properly collected and shipped to a recycling facility or disposed of as hazardous waste. Removal of mercury-containing equipment (e.g. switches, gauges, controls, etc.) should be carried out in a manner which prevents spillage and exposure to workers. The measures and procedures in the MOL Guideline Lead in Construction Projects for control of exposure to lead from paint applications during construction activities will also serve to control potential exposure to mercury in paint. SILICA Silica exists in several forms of which crystalline silica is of most concern with respect to potential worker exposures. Quartz is the most abundant type of crystalline silica. Some Page A-2

39 APPENDIX A commonly used construction materials containing silica include brick, refractory brick, concrete, concrete block, cement, mortar, rock and stone, sand, fill dirt, topsoil and asphalt containing rock or stone. The MOL Guideline, Silica on Construction Projects, dated September 2004, provides guidance in controlling exposure to silica dust during construction activities. In the guideline, silicacontaining construction operations are classified into three groups Type 1 (low risk), Type 2 (medium risk) and Type 3 (high risk) based on presumed airborne concentrations of respirable crystalline silica in the form of cristobalite, tridymite, quartz and tripoli. ISOCYANATES Isocyanates are a family of highly reactive chemicals with a low molecular weight. They are widely used in the manufacture of flexible and rigid foams, fibers, coatings such as paints, and varnishes, and elastomers. They are increasingly used in the automotive industry including autobody repair and automobile manufacturing. They are also used in building insulation materials. Spray-on polyurethane products containing isocyanates have been developed for a wide range of retail, commercial, and industrial uses to protect cement, wood, fiberglass, steel and aluminum, including protective coatings for truck beds, trailers, boats, foundations and decks. Isocyanates are powerful irritants to the mucous membranes of the eyes and gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts. Direct skin contact can also cause marked inflammation. Isocyanates can also sensitize workers, making them subject to severe asthma attacks if they are exposed to it again. There is evidence that both respiratory and dermal exposures can lead to sensitization. Controlling exposure to isocyanates is governed by the Occupational Health and Safety Act R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 842. VINYL CHLORIDE MONOMER Vinyl chloride is one of the largest petroleum-derived chemicals in world production. Large quantities of vinyl chloride are used in industry to produce the polymer polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic and vinyl products, among other uses. Vinyl chloride is also a by-product of the breakdown of chlorinated solvents by soil organisms and, when in soil, can migrate to groundwater sources eventually entering drinking water sources. Acute exposure to high levels of vinyl chloride in air can affect the central nervous system and can lead to dizziness, drowsiness and headaches. Chronic exposure to vinyl chloride through inhalation and oral exposure has resulted in liver damage. Vinyl chloride is a carcinogen and exposure through inhalation has been shown to increase the risk of a rare form of liver cancer. Controlling exposure to vinyl chloride is governed by the Occupational Health and Safety Act R.R , Regulation 846. Page A-3

40 APPENDIX A BENZENE Benzene is an aromatic hydrocarbon, and one of the most elemental petroleum-derived chemicals. It s found in the air from burning coal and oil, gasoline service stations and motor vehicle exhaust. Acute inhalation exposure of humans to benzene may cause drowsiness, dizziness, headaches, as well as eye, skin and respiratory tract irritation and, at high levels, unconsciousness. Chronic inhalation exposure has cause various disorders in the blood, including reduced numbers of red blood cells and aplastic anemia, in occupational settings. Benzene is a known human carcinogen for all routes of exposure. ACRYLONITRILE Acrylonitrile is often used for the manufacture of acrylic and modacrylic fibers, and as a raw material for plastics, adiponitrile, acrylamide and nitrile rubbers and barrier resins. Exposure to acrylonitrile is most commonly occupational. Acute effects of acrylonitrile through inhalation in high concentrations can cause a person to experience mucous membrane irritation, headaches, nausea, feelings of apprehension and nervous irritability. Chronic effects include prolonged headaches, fatigue, nausea and weakness. The OHSA classifies acrylonitrile as a designated substance. As such potential exposure and disposal of acrylonitrile is regulated. It is a probable human carcinogen. COKE OVEN EMISSIONS Coke is used as a fuel, and it is usually made from coal. It is a common component in the manufacturing of iron and steel. Several industries can expose workers to coke oven emissions including the aluminum, steel, graphite, electrical and construction industries. Coke oven emissions are a known human carcinogen. Chronic effects of exposure through inhalation include conjunctivitis, severe dermatitis and lesions of the respiratory and digestive systems. Controlling exposure to coke oven emissions is governed by OHSA R.R , Regulation 840. ARSENIC Metallic arsenic is mainly used in alloying with lead. Arsenic is also used in the agricultural, medical and mining industries. Very small amounts of arsenic can be added to the lead components in car batteries to increase the strength of the batteries. Gallium arsenide is an important semiconductor material used in integrated circuits. The presence of arsenic is prevalent in the automotive and manufacturing sectors. Arsenic can contaminate groundwater sources and can have adverse effects on human health if consumed. Groundwater that is contaminated with arsenic can be a result of naturally occurring arsenic or from the use of arsenic in a manufacturing process. Some private wells in North Page A-4

41 APPENDIX A America contain arsenic above the governing body standards. Arsenic can also be found in food from plants that have absorbed small amounts of arsenic. Elemental arsenic and arsenic compounds are toxic and dangerous for the environment, and are recognized as group 1 carcinogens (sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans). The EPA maximum arsenic concentration in drinking water is 10 ppb. ETHYLENE OXIDE Ethyl oxide, as a raw material, has many applications. It is commonly used as a key industrial chemical for making consumer products and non-consumer chemicals. Some uses include production of detergents, thickeners, solvents, plastics and various organic chemicals. Ethylene oxide is a very hazardous substance: at room temperature it is a flammable, carcinogenic, mutagenic, irritating and anesthetic gas. O.Reg.490/09 states that the short-term exposure limit (STEL) for ethylene oxide in a 15-minutes period is 10 ppm. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS The management of equipment classified as waste and containing PCBs at concentrations of 50 parts per million (mg/kg) or greater is regulated by Ontario Regulation 362, Waste Management PCBs (amended to O.Reg.232/11). Under this regulation, PCB waste is defined as any waste material containing PCBs in concentrations of 50 mg/kg or greater. Any equipment containing PCBs at or greater than this level, such as transformers, switchgear, light ballasts and capacitors, which is removed from service due to age, failure or as a result of decommissioning, is considered to constitute a PCB waste. Current federal legislation (effective July 1, 1980) has prohibited the manufacture and sale of new equipment containing PCBs. Since that time, continued operation of equipment supplied prior to this date and containing PCBs is still permitted. Handling, storage and disposition of such equipment is, however, tightly regulated and must be managed in accordance with provincial and federal government requirements as soon as it is taken out of service or becomes unserviceable. In most institutional, commercial and smaller industrial facilities, the primary source of equipment potentially containing PCBs is fluorescent and HID light ballasts. Small transformers may also be present. In larger industrial facilities, larger transformers and switch gear containing, or potentially containing, PCBs may also be present. Removal of in-service equipment containing PCBs, such as fluorescent light ballasts, capacitors and transformers, is subject to the requirements of the federal PCBs Regulations. When the PCB materials are classified as waste, jurisdiction falls under the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) and O.Reg.362. All remedial and PCB management work must be carried out under the terms of a Director s Instruction issued by a MOECC District Office (for quantities of PCB fluid greater than 50 litres). The PCB waste stream, regardless of quantity, must be registered with the MOECC, in accordance with O.Reg.347, General Waste Management. O.Reg.362 applies to any equipment containing greater than 1 kg of PCBs. Current Page A-5

42 APPENDIX A MOECC policies will, therefore, allow a one-time disposal of up to 40 ballasts as municipal waste. For quantities greater than 40, the ballasts must be classified as PCB waste and either placed into temporary storage or disposed of at an acceptable facility. OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCES An ozone-depleting substance (ODS) is any substance that results in the depletion of stratospheric ozone shield that screens the earth from some of the sun s harmful ultraviolet rays. Such substances must be sufficiently stable to survive the time needed to mix into the stratosphere. Common ozone-depleting substances are chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, methyl bromide and oxides of nitrogen. CFCs have been widely used as refrigerants, solvents, foam blowing agents and as aerosol propellants. Halons are used within fire extinguishing equipment. Methyl chloroform and carbon tetrachloride have been used mainly in industry as degreasers and adhesive, and for chemical processing. Several regulations apply to the use, storage, disposal and emission of ozone-depleting substances. The general provincial regulation pertaining to ODS is O.Reg.356 (amended to O.Reg.851/93) and O.Reg.189/94 (amended to O.Reg.238/01). Due to the nature of ODSs and their potential impact to the environment, their use, transport, storage and disposal is strictly enforced. Canada s current position on CFCs is to freeze production by January 1996 and complete elimination by The Federal Halocarbon Regulations (SOR/99-255) assist in the development of strategic plans for the use, control and phase-out of ODSs and their halocarbon alternatives for operations under federal jurisdiction. UREA-FORMALDEHYDE FOAM INSULATION Urea-formaldehyde foam insulation (UFFI) was developed in Europe in the 1950s as an improved means of insulating cavities in house walls. It was typically made at a construction site from a mixture of urea-formaldehyde resin, a foaming agent and compressed air. When the mixture is injected into the wall, urea and formaldehyde unite and cure into an insulating foam plastic. During the 1970s, when concerns about energy efficiency led to efforts to improve home insulation in Canada, UFFI became an important insulation product for existing houses. In the insulating process, a slight excess of formaldehyde was often added to ensure complete curing with the urea to produce the urea-formaldehyde foam. That excess was off-gassed during the curing, almost entirely within a day or two of injection. Health problems associated with exposure to formaldehyde include: eye, nose, and throat irritation, coughing, headaches dizziness and, in very high concentrations, bronchial pneumonia and pulmonary edema. As a result, the use of UFFI was banned in 1980 by the Federal Hazardous Products Act (R.S.C. 1985). Page A-6

43 APPENDIX B: CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS

44 Kitimat Rd Mississauga, ON, L5N 5M Certificate of Analysis Peritus Environmental Consultants 320 Woolwich St S Breslau, ON N0B 1M0 Attn: Naz Ritchie Client PO: Project: Custody: Report Date: 23-Feb-2018 Order Date: 16-Feb-2018 Order #: This Certificate of Analysis contains analytical data applicable to the following samples as submitted: Paracel ID Client ID A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B Approved By: Emma Diaz Senior Analyst Any use of these results implies your agreement that our total liabilty in connection with this work, however arising, shall be limited to the amount paid by you for this work, and that our employees or agents shall not under any circumstances be liable to you in connection with this work. Page 1 of 7

45 Order #: Certificate of Analysis Client: Peritus Environmental Consultants Client PO: Report Date: 23-Feb-2018 Order Date: 16-Feb-2018 Project Description: C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C D E F G Page 2 of 7

46 Order #: Certificate of Analysis Client: Peritus Environmental Consultants Client PO: Report Date: 23-Feb-2018 Order Date: 16-Feb-2018 Project Description: Asbestos, PLM Visual Estimation **MDL - 0.5%** Paracel I.D. Sample Date Layers Analyzed Colour Description Asbestos Detected: Material Identification Feb-18 sample homogenized Grey Caulking No Client ID: 01A Feb-18 sample homogenized Grey Caulking No Client ID: 01B Feb-18 sample homogenized Grey Mastic No Client ID: 01C Feb-18 sample homogenized Black Mastic No Client ID: 02A Feb-18 sample homogenized Black Mastic No Client ID: 02B Feb-18 sample homogenized Black Mastic No Client ID: 02C Feb-18 sample homogenized White Texture Coat No Client ID: 03A Feb-18 sample homogenized White Texture Coat No Client ID: 03B Feb-18 sample homogenized White Texture Coat No Client ID: 03C Feb-18 sample homogenized Yellow Mastic No Client ID: 04A Feb-18 sample homogenized Yellow Mastic No Client ID: 04B Feb-18 sample homogenized Yellow Mastic No Client ID: 04C % Content Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Drywall Joint Compound Yes Client ID: 05A Chrysotile Feb-18 Client ID: 05B not analyzed Feb-18 Client ID: 05C not analyzed Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Ceiling Tile No Client ID: 06A Cellulose MMVF Page 3 of 7

47 Order #: Certificate of Analysis Client: Peritus Environmental Consultants Client PO: Report Date: 23-Feb-2018 Order Date: 16-Feb-2018 Project Description: Asbestos, PLM Visual Estimation **MDL - 0.5%** Paracel I.D. Sample Date Layers Analyzed Colour Description Asbestos Detected: Material Identification Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Ceiling Tile No Client ID: 06B Cellulose MMVF Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Ceiling Tile No Client ID: 06C Cellulose MMVF Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Ceiling Tile No Client ID: 07A Cellulose MMVF Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Ceiling Tile No Client ID: 07B Cellulose MMVF Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Ceiling Tile No Client ID: 07C Cellulose MMVF Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 08A Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 08B Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 08C Feb-18 sample homogenized Black Mastic No Client ID: 08A Feb-18 sample homogenized Black Mastic No Client ID: 08B Feb-18 sample homogenized Black Mastic No Client ID: 08C % Content Page 4 of 7

48 Order #: Certificate of Analysis Client: Peritus Environmental Consultants Client PO: Report Date: 23-Feb-2018 Order Date: 16-Feb-2018 Project Description: Asbestos, PLM Visual Estimation **MDL - 0.5%** Paracel I.D. Sample Date Layers Analyzed Colour Description Asbestos Detected: Material Identification Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Ceiling Tile Yes Client ID: 09A Amosite Chrysotile Cellulose MMVF % Content Feb-18 Client ID: 09B not analyzed Feb-18 Client ID: 09C not analyzed Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 010A Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 010B Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 010C Feb-18 sample homogenized Yellow Mastic No Client ID: 010A Feb-18 sample homogenized Yellow Mastic No Client ID: 010B Feb-18 sample homogenized Yellow Mastic No Client ID: 010C Feb-18 sample homogenized Off-White Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 011A Feb-18 sample homogenized Off-White Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 011B Feb-18 sample homogenized Off-White Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 011C Feb-18 sample homogenized Black Mastic No Client ID: 011A Feb-18 sample homogenized Black Mastic No Client ID: 011B Feb-18 sample homogenized Black Mastic No Client ID: 011C Page 5 of 7

49 Order #: Certificate of Analysis Client: Peritus Environmental Consultants Client PO: Report Date: 23-Feb-2018 Order Date: 16-Feb-2018 Project Description: Asbestos, PLM Visual Estimation **MDL - 0.5%** Paracel I.D. Sample Date Layers Analyzed Colour Description Asbestos Detected: Material Identification Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 012A Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 012B Feb-18 sample homogenized Beige Vinyl Floor Tile No Client ID: 012C Feb-18 sample homogenized Yellow Mastic No Client ID: 012A Feb-18 sample homogenized Yellow Mastic No Client ID: 012B Feb-18 sample homogenized Yellow Mastic No Client ID: 012C Feb-18 sample homogenized Brown Exterior Mastic No Client ID: 013A Feb-18 sample homogenized Brown Exterior Mastic No Client ID: 013B Feb-18 sample homogenized Brown Exterior Mastic No Client ID: 013C % Content Feb-18 Client ID: 05D not analyzed Feb-18 Client ID: 05E not analyzed Feb-18 Client ID: 05F not analyzed Feb-18 Client ID: 05G not analyzed * MMVF: Man Made Vitreous Fibers: Fiberglass, Mineral Wool, Rockwool, Glasswool ** Analytes in bold indicate asbestos mineral content. Analysis Summary Table Analysis Method Reference/Description Lab Location NVLAP Lab Code * Analysis Date Asbestos, PLM Visual Estimation by EPA 600/R-93/ Mississauga Feb-18 * Reference to the NVLAP term does not permit the user of this report to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. Page 6 of 7

50 Order #: Certificate of Analysis Client: Peritus Environmental Consultants Client PO: Report Date: 23-Feb-2018 Order Date: 16-Feb-2018 Project Description: Work Order Revisions / Comments None Page 7 of 7

51

52 St. Laurent Blvd Ottawa, ON, K1G 4J Certificate of Analysis Peritus Environmental Consultants 320 Woolwich St S Breslau, ON N0B 1M0 Attn: Naz Ritchie Client PO: Project: Custody: Report Date: 22-Feb-2018 Order Date: 16-Feb-2018 Order #: This Certificate of Analysis contains analytical data applicable to the following samples as submitted: Paracel ID Client ID P P P P-04 Approved By: Dale Robertson, BSc Laboratory Director Any use of these results implies your agreement that our total liabilty in connection with this work, however arising shall be limited to the amount paid by you for this work, and that our employees or agents shall not under circumstances be liable to you in connection with this work Page 1 of 3

53 Order #: Certificate of Analysis Client: Peritus Environmental Consultants Client PO: Report Date: 22-Feb-2018 Order Date: 16-Feb-2018 Project Description: Analysis Summary Table Analysis Method Reference/Description Extraction Date Analysis Date Metals, ICP-OES based on MOE E3470, ICP-OES 21-Feb Feb-18 Sample Data Revisions None Work Order Revisions / Comments : None Other Report Notes : n/a: not applicable ND: Not Detected MDL: Method Detection Limit Source Result: Data used as source for matrix and duplicate samples %REC: Percent recovery. RPD: Relative percent difference. Page 2 of 3

54 Order #: Certificate of Analysis Client: Peritus Environmental Consultants Client PO: Report Date: 22-Feb-2018 Order Date: 16-Feb-2018 Project Description: Sample Results Lead Matrix: Paint Sample Date: 16-Feb-18 Paracel ID Client ID Units MDL Result P-01 ug/g 20 < P-02 ug/g 20 < P-03 ug/g 20 < P-04 ug/g 20 <20 Laboratory Internal QA/QC Analyte Matrix Blank Result Reporting Limit Units Lead ND 20 ug/g Matrix Duplicate Source Result Lead ND 20 ug/g ND Matrix Spike %REC %REC Limit Lead 203 ug/l ND RPD RPD Limit Notes Page 3 of 3

55