Wall Enclosure Monitoring and Performance Assessment for the Orchards at Orenco Passive House

Transcription

1 Wall Enclosure Monitoring and Performance Assessment for the Orchards at Orenco Passive House PORTLAND BEC / WALSH CONSTRUCTION CO / ROXUL APRIL 3, 2017 JONATHAN SMEGAL, SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER, RDH BUILDING SCIENCE.

2 Orchards at Orenco Moisture Monitoring System Data Analysis Graphs Exterior Insulation Comparison of two different High-R wall assemblies 2

3 3

4 4

5 (Roxul Comfortboard 80) Smegal Jonathan and John Straube. Hygrothermal Analysis of Exterior Rockwool Insulation. December Building Science Corporation. RR

6 Stud Cavity Instrumentation In all four suites Guard bay on each side of measurement bay Sensors at different heights in the cavity 6

7 Relative Humidity With a temperature sensor Vapor permeable water proof protective cover Two locations against sheathing Two locations at mid depth 7

8 Moisture content Metal pins Tip measurement Electrical resistance correlates to wood moisture content With a temperature sensor Three locations on sheathing, one on framing 8

9 Exterior Sensors Relative humidity sensors on the interior and exterior surface of the exterior insulation *Some redundancy as a backup* A lot of care taken at penetrations 9

10 Exterior RH - Interior and exterior surface of Roxul 10

11 11

12 12

13 Boundary Conditions Interior Conditions Measured at HRV return Hobos Exterior Conditions Local weather station data 13

14 Data Analysis 14

15 Performance Evaluation Criteria Sheathing moisture content highest likelihood of moisture accumulation in colder climates Relative humidity at the sheathing keep in mind duration, temperature Sheathing dew point compare interior dew point to sheathing temperature Mold Index Start by looking at the interior boundary conditions since they significantly influence the wall performance 15

16 Interior Conditions - temp 16

17 Interior Conditions - RH 17

18 Sheathing moisture content 18

19 Sheathing relative humidity - North 19

20 Sheathing temperature - North 20

21 Sheathing relative humidity - South 21

22 Sheathing Dew Point Compare the dew point of the interior suite air to sheathing temperature. This does not mean there s condensation occurring, just possible Relative Risk Important to consider length of time less than dew point, and the magnitude of the difference Comparisons of a previous study 22

23 Sheathing Dew Point Hours of potential condensation - North Suites 520, South Suites 268, 267 over two years 23

24 Sheathing Dew Point Comparison 24

25 (5 months 3912 hours) Smegal, Jonathan, Joseph Lstiburek, John Straube, and Aaron Grin. Moisture-Related Durability of Walls with Exterior Insulation in the Pacific Northwest. Paper presented at Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings XII International Conference, Clearwater, FL, December

26 Mold Index Some research conducted shows ASHRAE 160 correlates poorly to biological growth. The Finnish VTT has been shown to provide a greater degree of reliability. All suites in Orchards are 0 on the index 26

27 Exterior Insulation (CI) 27

28 Advantages of CI Continuous Significantly reduces thermal bridging (increases effective R-value) Energy benefits Comfort benefits Exterior Increases temperature of the condensation plane Durability benefits, reduced risk of moisture condensation and accumulation

29 Assumes no floor slabs, no double studs etc. Best-case R-values for stud walls

30 Perfect or Ideal Wall Must consider cost, constructability, etc. Compromises on insulation location

31 Screws Through Insulation Rapidly gaining popularity to meet increasing R-value requirements Uncertainty about: How to do it Allowable loads Fastener types Fastener spacing Deflection

32 Extensive testing has demonstrated performance

33 Screws Through Insulation Highly Effective Continuous Vertical Z-Girt Continuous Horizontal Z-Girt Aluminum T-Clip Intermittent Galvanized Clip Stainless Steel Clip Isolated Galvanized Clip Fiberglass Clip Galv. Screws Galvanized Screws Galvanized Steel Screws Fiberglass Clip SS Screws Stainless Steel Screws Stainless Steel Screws Fiberglass Clip No Through Screws 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent Effectiveness of Exterior Insulation (Typical Range)

34 Comparison of two different High-R wall assemblies 34

35 Enclosure Performance Comparison Two Passive House projects Victoria, British Columbia Portland, Oregon Very similar temperatures (HDD) Both High-R wall assemblies Different strategies Both have moisture monitoring installed *Smegal, Jonathan, Robert Lepage, and Chris Schumacher. Moisture-Related Durability of InService High-R Wall Assemblies in Pacific Northwest Climates. Paper presented at Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Whole Buildings XIII International Conference, Clearwater, FL, December

36 36

37 (Roxul Comfortboard 80) 37

38 Evaluation Criteria Challenge of comparing the performance of two different buildings in different cities Show the relationship between exterior temperature and sheathing temperature Mold Index 38

39 39

40 40

41 Conclusions From the analysis of measurement data, there is no indication of any moisture related durability risks in the enclosure at the Orchards Passive House. Using continuous exterior insulation has both energy and durability related benefits that reduce the risk of moisture issues in the enclosure compared to a similar wall without exterior insulation 41

42 Acknowledgements ROXUL Energy Design Center for funding the research Walsh Construction Co. for providing a building to monitor, and helping ensure the installation went as smoothly as possible

43 Contact me at: LAB Events (Learning About Building Science) are webcast live from the RDH Building Science Laboratories facility in Waterloo, Ontario. Our goal is to take high-quality research and building science principles and make them fun! Find out more at learnbuildingscience.com