Developing SUMP 2.0. Concept for updating and further development of the SUMP Guidelines. Siegfried Rupprecht, Susanne Böhler, Lasse Brand

Transcription

1 Developing SUMP 2.0 Concept for updating and further development of the SUMP Guidelines Siegfried Rupprecht, Susanne Böhler, Lasse Brand

2 Contents 1. Objectives 2. How to move to "SUMP 2.0"? Improvements Extensions (existing, planned and potential) Modifications (existing, planned and potential) 3. Knowledge map 4. Proposed process and roles 5. Timeline 6. Next steps 7. Suggested activities at SUMP Conference 2

3 1. Objectives (of this session) To agree on a working mechanism/ process for the update and further development of the SUMP Guidelines, including: Timeline Responsibilities Draft list of topics for extensions and modifications 3

4 1. Objectives: Why do we need an update of "SUMP" Wealth of practical SUMP experience waiting to be analysed and transformed into good practice guidance. Supplementary guiding material originating from various national and EU funded SUMP projects. New mobility developments (emerging technologies, new policy challenges/ opportunities) that require a rethinking and extension of the current SUMP guidelines. 4

5 1. Objectives (of the process) Consolidation of the take-up process of SUMP Addressing emerging needs from cities and Member States for further development Coordinated development of one comprehensive 'compendium of guidelines' bearing the logo of the Commission (as owner of the process) and of the SUMP Platform 5

6 3 Modification 2. How to move to "SUMP 2.0"? 2 Extension 1 Improvement 2 Extension SUMP Guidelines 2 Extension 6

7 2. How to move to "SUMP 2.0"? (1) Updates and usability improvements of the SUMP Guidelines Identify gaps and check validity of process steps Document experiences as good practices and case studies Translate SUMP Guidelines and website into additional European languages, taking into account national terminology Connection with Urban Mobility Indicators Ensure consistency between extensions/ modifications/ SUMP 2.0 guidance SUMP knowledge map: introduction and overview of available guidance 7

8 2. How to move to "SUMP 2.0"? (2) Thematic SUMP Guidelines extensions Apply the SUMP guidance to new areas o specific policy areas of urban mobility (e.g. logistics, e-mobility), or o new topics/ actors being involved (e.g. emerging technologies) Elaborate specific steps of the SUMP cycle (e.g. financing, action planning, implementation) Ensure that relevant fields are covered and overlaps avoided 8

9 Existing SUMP Guidelines extensions 2 Extension Platform branded: Measure selection (CH4LLENGE) Monitoring (CH4LLENGE) Participation (CH4LLENGE) Institutional cooperation (CH4LLENGE) Not yet Platform branded: Action Plans (SUMPs-Up) Measure selection and measure packages: 3 manuals for starter, intermediate and advanced SUMP cities (SUMPs-Up) Sustainable Urban Logistics Plan (ENCLOSE) more to be added 9

10 Planned SUMP Guidelines extensions 2 Extension Financing, procurement, and contracting of SUMP measures (ECCENTRIC) Addressing vulnerable groups and gender issues (ECCENTRIC) Inclusion of suburban districts in SUMPs (ECCENTRIC) SUMP guidance for multi-modal alternative fuels deployment, especially in public transport (ELIPTIC, Subgroup on Alternative Fuels in Cities of the Sustainable Transport Forum) more to be added 10

11 Potential topics for future extensions 2 Extension Topic Electromobility and SEAP-SUMP integration Shared mobility, MaaS and ITS Connected and Automated Driving Health, including Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) Urban logistics / Sustainable Urban Logistics Plan (SULP) National SUMP frameworks Planning for innovative collective transport at the regional level more to be added Project that develops the extension* (SUMPs-Up)*, linked to "automation readiness" concept of CoEXist (Prosperity)* (Prosperity)* (LOW-CARB) *still to be discussed today and approved by DG MOVE/INEA 11

12 2. How to move to "SUMP 2.0"? (3) SUMP Guidelines modifications Adjust the SUMP process to meet needs of specific target groups and areas o small cities, regions o TEN-T and urban nodes o countries with weak planning tradition and strong need for infrastructure and policy development Requires intensive dialogue with SUMP 2.0 process to ensure overall consistency of SUMP concept 12

13 SUMP Guidelines modifications 3 Modification Existing Polycentric regions (Poly-SUMP) Potential future updates Urban nodes/ metropolitan regions/ TEN-T perspective Small and medium-sized cities Countries with weak planning tradition 13

14 Other (strategic) issues Minimum standards and quality assurance of SUMP Key role of Member States, ESIF programme offices, European Commission Project contributions o SUMPs-Up: Substantial update of the SUMP Self-Assessment (3 languages) o PROSPERITY: Development of assessment schemes 14 Telco update SUMP Guidelines 28/02/2018 Siegfried Rupprecht

15 Categories Existing extensions, Platform-branded Existing extensions, not yet Platform-branded Planned extensions Potential topics for future extensions Topics and related projects Measure selection (CH4LLENGE) Monitoring (CH4LLENGE) Participation (CH4LLENGE) Institutional cooperation (CH4LLENGE) Action Plans (SUMPs-Up) Measure selection and measure packages: 3 manuals for starter, intermediate and advanced SUMP cities (SUMPs-Up) Sustainable Urban Logistics Plan (ENCLOSE) ( ) Financing, procurement, and contracting of SUMP measures (ECCENTRIC) Addressing vulnerable groups and gender issues (ECCENTRIC) Inclusion of suburban districts in SUMPs (ECCENTRIC) Multi-modal alternative fuels deployment (ELIPTIC, STF Subgroup) ( ) Electromobility and SEAP-SUMP integration Shared mobility, MaaS and ITS Connected and Automated Driving (SUMPs-Up)* Health, including Health Economic Assessment Tool Urban logistics / SULP (Prosperity)* National SUMP frameworks (Prosperity)* ( ) Existing modifications Polycentric regions (Poly-SUMP) Potential topics for future modifications Urban nodes/ metropolitan regions/ TEN-T perspective Small and medium-sized cities Countries with weak planning tradition ( )

16 Example Revision focus Type 3. Preparing the SUMP knowledge map Planning context Policy goal Technologies / measures Methodology Focus on process Structural changes in the planning cycle Horizontal integration Tailor to a specific policy goal: modify planning tasks, indicators, measures, good practices Focus on process and measures Adress uncertainties in planning, dynamisation of planning indicators, measures and good practices Need to link with policy goals and planning process Focus on measures and implementation Deepening/ updating knowledge about specific aspects of planning process Focus on process Example "Small cities" Example "Health" Example "Electromobility" Example "Monitoring and evaluation" 16

17 4. Proposed process Consultation process with key stakeholders (limited, but systematic); through SUMP Conference, survey, workshops? Active participation of SUMP projects to ensure successful "SUMP 2.0" process Coordinated development of extensions and modifications that will form a coherent 'compendium of guidelines' Check need for updates to tasks and timelines in workplans of contracted SUMP projects to allow them to deliver Projects and activities outside DG MOVE s direct area of influence persuaded of becoming part of an EU-level "SUMP 2.0" activity 17

18 4. Proposed roles of partners and projects Overall decision taking and coordination: SUMP Coordination Group Editorial board: small subgroup of Coordination Group Organisational support: Eltis support team Rupprecht Consult: o Update of SUMP Guidelines (under SUMPs-Up) o Editorial coordination (outside of SUMPs-Up, self-funded) Content provision: SUMP take-up projects, CIVITAS IA projects, others 18

19 5. Timeline 19

20 6. Next steps Editorial Board Tasks: Develops knowledge map Prepares decisions for Coordination Group Coordinates extensions and modifications, cooperates with authors Proposes extensions and modifications for SUMP Platform branding Eltis takes over operational aspects Members: small and operational subgroup of Coordination Group, incl. DG MOVE Meeting frequency: back-to-back to Coordination Group meetings, plus telephone conferences Knowledge map Input for SUMP 2.0 Guidelines, supports selection of topics for extensions and modifications Rupprecht Consult: Develops concept, updates EC projects and stakeholders: Contribute Editorial Board / Coordination Group: Comments SUMP Conference Contribution to SUMP 2.0: Taking stock and identifying emerging needs Systematic stakeholder input on SUMP Guidelines improvement, extensions and modifications 20

21 B2. Planning for connected and automated mobility B3. Planning alternative fuel infra-structure B4. Planning for MaaS and shared mobility services B5. Planning for urban freight and logistics A4. Regional SUMPs and TEN-T A5. SUMPs and SECAPs C5. Finance and procurement D4. Planning in small cities 7. Suggested activities at SUMP Conference Opening Plenary B1. SUMP 2.0 Guidelines SUMP 2.0 stakeholder process introduced in opening session Launch that creates wide attention for process during and after the conference Continued stakeholder input with interactive formats throughout the conference: Taking stock of what works, key lessons and good practices for SUMP Emerging needs and missing guidance Summary of preliminary results in the closing session (panel discussion?) Closing Plenary Side event Editorial board meeting Follow-up survey 22

22 B2. Planning for connected and automated mobility B3. Planning alternative fuel infra-structure B4. Planning for MaaS and shared mobility services B5. Planning for urban freight and logistics A4. Regional SUMPs and TEN-T A5. SUMPs and SECAPs C5. Finance and procurement D4. Planning in small cities 7. Suggested activities at SUMP Conference B1. SUMP 2.0 Guidelines Side event Opening Plenary Closing Plenary Follow-up survey Editorial board meeting "SUMP 2.0" stream (B) Launch of process and briefing by EC Collection of ideas in interactive session, input on what needs to be updated in SUMP Guidelines Potential topics for group work: Simplifying the SUMP process Adding dynamic elements Gaps in the planning process Measure selection and action planning Measure-oriented planning Long-term learning in a political environment Quality assessment Good practices and case studies Languages and national terminology National frameworks much more 23

23 B2. Planning for connected and automated mobility B3. Planning alternative fuel infrastructure B4. Planning for MaaS and shared mobility services B5. Planning for urban freight and logistics A4. Regional SUMPs and TEN-T A5. SUMPs and SECAPs C5. Finance and procurement D4. Planning in small cities 7. Suggested activities at SUMP Conference Opening Plenary B1. SUMP 2.0 Guidelines Closing Plenary Side event Editorial board meeting Stocktaking in SUMP 2.0 stream and other directly relevant sessions Collection of good practices and guidance needs for extensions and modifications Common facilitation format with guiding questions that each presentation responds to: What are key lessons that SUMP 2.0 needs to include? What guidance do you currently miss in this area? (practitioner view) Interactive formats that include stakeholder feedback also from participants Follow-up survey 24

24 B2. Planning for connected and automated mobility B3. Planning alternative fuel infra-structure B4. Planning for MaaS and shared mobility services B5. Planning for urban freight and logistics A4. Regional SUMPs and TEN-T A5. SUMPs and SECAPs C5. Finance and procurement D4. Planning in small cities 7. Suggested activities at SUMP Conference Opening Plenary B1. SUMP 2.0 Guidelines Focus group meeting: Specific criticism and feedback Small round of invited stakeholders, structured format Focus Group meeting Closing Plenary Follow-up survey (EU-wide) Editorial Board meeting Editorial Board meeting: Consolidation of conference input Planning of follow-up process "SUMP 2.0" Survey Feedback and needs assessment 25

25 Thank you! Legal Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. All images are provided by the respective partners (unless otherwise noted) and are approved for reproduction in this publication. 26