RIGOLETS PASS BRIDGE ~ TEST PILE PROGRAM
|
|
- Ada Burns
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RIGOLETS PASS BRIDGE ~ TEST PILE PROGRAM By: Chris Nickel, P.E. LA DOTD Pavement & Geotechnical Services
2 BACKGROUND ~This state project consists of the construction of the new Rigolets Pass Bridge located in Orleans Parish along route US 90 near Chalmette, which is northeast of New Orleans. The Rigolets Pass waterway connects Lake Pontchartrain with the Gulf of Mexico. ~The existing bridge was built in 1931 and consists of two narrow traffic lanes along with a swing span to control major waterway traffic. In order to safely improve roadway and waterway traffic flow, a new two-lane high-rise structure will be built west of the existing structure. The new structure will consist of 63 bents with a total bridge length of 5,489 feet.
3 LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN I-10 TWIN SPANS SLIDELL MS. CAUSEWAY NEW ORLEANS LAKE BORGNE RIGOLETS PASS
4 EAST APPROACH ST. TAMMANY WEST APPROACH ORLEANS
5 EXISTING EAST APPROACH
6 SWING SPAN EXISTING STRUCTURE
7 PILES TESTED PROGRAM CONSISTS OF 6 PILES 2-30 SQUARE PPC 4 66 SPUN CAST POST TENSIONED CYLINDERS LOADING METHODS DYNAMIC / CAPWAP STATIC (30 TEST PILE #1 ONLY) STATNAMIC (3)
8 CPT SOIL BORING TEST PILE #1 30 PILES
9 TEST PILE #1 30 SQUARE PPC VOIDED TOTAL PENETRATION 44 DESIGN LOAD 195 TONS LOADINGS DYNAMIC / CAPWAP SET CHECKS : IEOD, 23 m, 60 m, 22 hr, & 15 d 14 DAY STATIC 21 DAY STATCAMIC
10 SOFT CLAY GROUND +1.8 RUN TIP
11
12 CPT CAPACITY PREDICTION
13 ENVIORNMENTAL CONCERNS VIBRATION MONITORING FORT PIKE THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES GULF STURGEON WEST INDIAN MANATEE & SEA TURTLES
14 FORT PIKE
15
16 RETAINING WALL TO BE MONITORED
17
18 TEST PILE #1
19
20 AFT S STATNAMIC CABLES
21 TRANSMITTER RECEIVER
22
23
24 NOT MUCH TO DRIVE
25 COLLECTING THAT DATA OR NOT
26 *Not enough movement to fully mobilize the end bearing. EOD CAPACITY PREDICTIONS LOADING CAPWAP TIME IEOD 23 m 60 m 22 hr 15 d TOTAL CAPACITY (Tons) SKIN FRICTION (TONS) PERM NT DIS 32 BL/12 18 BL/6 29 BL/6 STATIC 14 d * (Stat.) 0.21 STATNAMIC 21d *
27 Pile Capacity, kn TIME VS. CAPACITY 7,000 STATNAMIC 21 DAY 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 IEOD 22 MIN 60 MIN 1 DAY 2,000 1, Elapsed Time t, days GRAPH PROVIDED BY PAUL BULLOCK, PHD., PE
28 66 CYLINDER PILES ~ SPUN CAST & POST TENTIONED 16 AND 8 SECTIONS TEST PILE LENGTHS BETWEEN GULF COST PRESTRESS PLANT (Pass Christian, Ms.)
29 STEEL REINFORCEMENT
30 CONCRETE PLACEMENT
31
32
33
34 16
35
36 OPEN DUCTS FOR STRAIN GAGES
37 SG 4 SG 3 SG 2 SG 1
38
39 CPT B-30 TP 2 LOW WATER FOOTINGS
40
41 DIAM. & L=153 EXCAVATED TO PILE RUN TIP ELEVATION PENETRATION
42 TP 3 TP 4 TP 2 IND
43
44
45
46 15 PLYWOOD PILE CUSHION
47 EOD CAPACITY PREDICTIONS TP 2 PREDICTED PERMANENT LOADING TIME CAPACITY DISPLACEMENT (Tons) CAPWAP Initial EOD hr. * STATNAMIC 21 days *1, *Not enough movement to fully mobilize the end bearing. Design Load = 635 tons
48 L = 200 EXCAVATED TO INITIAL REDRIVE PENETRATION = 100
49 EOD CAPACITY PREDICTIONS IND. PILE PREDICTED PERMANENT LOADING TIME CAPACITY DISPLACEMENT (Tons) CAPWAP Initial EOD hr STATNAMIC Design Load = 484 tons
50 TEST PILE # EXC L = 183 EXCAVATED TO PILE RUN = PENETRATION = 94.5
51 EOD CAPACITY PREDICTIONS TP 3 PREDICTED PERMANENT LOADING TIME CAPACITY DISPLACEMENT (Tons) CAPWAP Initial EOD hr. 1, STATNAMIC 22 days 1, Design Load = 483 tons
52 EOD CAPACITY PREDICTIONS TP 4 PREDICTED PERMANENT LOADING TIME CAPACITY DISPLACEMENT (Tons) CAPWAP Initial EOD hr. 1, STATNAMIC 30 days *1, *Not enough movement to fully mobilize the end bearing. Design Load = 587 tons
53 IND 5
54 IND. PILE #5 RUN 30 SQUARE -28.0
55 SANDS
56 EOD CAPACITY PREDICTIONS IP 5 PREDICTED PERMANENT LOADING TIME CAPACITY DISPLACEMENT (Tons) CAPWAP Initial EOD hr. * STATNAMIC *Not enough movement to fully mobilize the end bearing. Design Load = 162 tons
57 PREPARING IND. PILE #5
58 PLENTY OF DEBRIS REMAINS BY DECEMBER
59 SEPTEMBER 3, FLY OVER EAST APPROACH TEST PILE #5
60 WEST APPROACH
61 2 MONTH DELAY DUE TO HURRICANE KATRINA 69,918 yd3 OF DEBRIS REMOVED AT A COST OF $1.5 MILLION
62 APPROXIMATE 20 STORM SURGE
63 APRIL 2005
64 AUGUST 2005
65 Comments or Questions? Thank you!