TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: DISCUSSION ITEM

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: DISCUSSION ITEM"

Transcription

1 F3 Office of the President TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: For Meeting of September 14, 2016 DISCUSSION ITEM DISCUSSION OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BUDGET FOR STATE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND PLANS FOR CAMPUS PROJECTS REQUIRING BUDGET APPROVAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In accordance with Sections through of the Education Code, as added by Chapter 50, Statutes of 2013 (Assembly Bill 94), and amended by Chapter 22, Statutes of 2015 (Senate Bill 81), the University is authorized to finance capital expenditures with its State General Fund support appropriation. Under the provisions of the Code, the University is required to submit its Budget for State Capital Improvements to each house of the Legislature, budget subcommittees in each house, and Department of Finance by September 1, The proposed Budget for State Capital Improvements totals $198 million. The budget includes eight major capital projects and the first phase of a systemwide deferred maintenance program that reflects the University s proposal to match any one-time State appropriation for deferred maintenance. The capital projects target seismic and life safety corrections or improvements at the Berkeley, Los Angeles, and San Francisco campuses and previous enrollment growth at the Irvine campus (refer to Attachment 1 for project summaries). The budget will also be supported with non-state resources, as follows: Financing Supported by State General Funds Non-State Resources Capital Projects $148 million $116.5 million Deferred Maintenance $ 50 million Total $198 million $116.5 million The Budget for State Capital Improvements includes full project budgets for four projects. This item serves as the discussion item for the Budget for State Capital Improvements, including the four projects which will be presented for full budget approval in November These four projects seeking full budget approval include non-state resources and are listed in Display A, and the full list of projects can be found in Display C. Additional information on these projects is also provided in Attachments 2-5. Campus representatives will present brief overviews of the four projects. Approval of external financing

2 FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES -2- COMMITTEE September 14, 2016 F3 associated with the State General Funds will be subject to a future Regents action in the spring of Display A: Four Projects with State and Non-State Funds Phases with Non- State Funds 1 Campus Project Irvine Interdisciplinary Sciences Building D/C/E Los Angeles Franz Tower Seismic Renovation P/W/C Los Angeles CHS-NPI Seismic Correction P/W/C San Francisco Mission Center Building Seismic Life Safety Improvements C Total Non-State Funds $116.5 million BACKGROUND In accordance with Sections through of the Education Code, as added by Chapter 50, Statutes of 2013 (Assembly Bill 94), and amended by Chapter 22, Statutes of 2015 (Senate Bill 81), the University of California is authorized to finance capital expenditures with its State General Fund support appropriation. The authority provided in Assembly Bill 94 allows the University of California to use its State General Fund allocation, with certain conditions, to finance the design, construction, and equipping of academic facilities to address seismic and life safety needs, enrollment growth, modernization of out-of-date facilities, and renewal or expansion of infrastructure to serve academic programs. Senate Bill 81 expanded the eligible use of the allocation to include availability payments, lease payments, installment payments, and other similar or related payments for capital expenditures. These provisions authorize the University to use its State General Fund support appropriation to make debt service payments on its General Revenue Bonds (GRB) issued for projects that have been approved by the State. This funding mechanism is referred to as State General Funds Financed or GFF. Since 2013, the University has received approval from Department of Finance and the Legislature for 26 projects, totaling $1.2 billion, under the provisions of the Education Code. The Regents have approved the budget and financing, under separate actions (refer to Display B, below). Display B: State Capital Improvements under Section 92493, et seq. of the Education Code Fiscal Year Budget Regents Budget Regents Financing $ 132,309,000 November 2013 March ,812,000 November 2013 March ,565,000 September 2014 May * 527,300,000 November 2015 July 2016 Total $1,233,986,000 * Merced State 2020 project Over the four years since these new provisions became law, every campus has benefited from the ability to implement, complete, or equip existing critical projects. Excluding the Merced 2020 project approved for , over 50 percent ($368 million) of funding has supported seismic and life safety projects. Projects that addressed previous enrollment growth accounted for 1 A Key to Acronyms may be found at the end of this document.

3 FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES -3- COMMITTEE September 14, 2016 F3 25 percent ($175 million), and the remainder ($164 million) funded modernization, infrastructure, and equipping buildings STATE CAPITAL BUDGET To arrive at the current Budget for State Capital Improvements, the University utilized a new three-year approach to planning for funding of the State capital program. The University is implementing a funding model that targets two major capital components: (1) deferred maintenance and (2) campus projects that address seismic and life safety issues or enrollment growth. These priorities were examined in the context that campuses and the system benefit from a multi-year approach to budgeting and project planning. Although capital projects are approved for funding in one year, these projects take multiple years to complete. The proposed Budget for State Capital Improvements totals $198 million and reflects these two capital priorities. Systemwide Deferred Maintenance Program The proposed Budget for State Capital Improvements include the first phase of a systemwide deferred maintenance program to (1) fund existing deferred maintenance as a match to any one-time State funds received for deferred maintenance and (2) perform facility assessments on State-eligible space. The proposed deferred maintenance program recommends funding to perform Facility Condition Assessments (FCA) to evaluate the University s State-supportable capital asset portfolio. The FCA will capture a comprehensive capital asset inventory (e.g. buildings; structures; mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems; water, electric, gas, and sewer utilities; and supporting infrastructure, including roads, walkways, and bridges), identify deficiencies with the assets, associate costs for replacement or repair, assign risk and prioritization scores to the assets, and deliver a credible deferred maintenance and capital renewal forecast for State-eligible space. In addition to the assessments, the program proposes to partner with the State in funding existing deferred maintenance projects. The Governor and Legislature recognize that deferred maintenance is a serious issue for the State of California. In , the State designated $120 million in one-time General Fund deferred maintenance funding, with $25 million provided to the University. The Governor s deferred maintenance proposal included $500 million, and the University s allocation increased to $35 million. With this item, the University is proposing to match the UC General Fund allocation (up to $35 million) for deferred maintenance work for State-supportable space. The work will expand on the lists of projects submitted for the and State Budget Acts. Capital Projects The capital projects target seismic and life safety corrections at the Berkeley, Los Angeles, and San Francisco campuses, and previous enrollment growth at the Irvine campus.

4 FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES -4- COMMITTEE September 14, 2016 F3 This portfolio includes capital projects that will also be supported with non-state resources (refer to Display C). Display C: Budget for State Capital Improvements Campus Project State (Phases) 2 Non-State (Phases) Berkeley 2223 Fulton Seismic Demolition C Berkeley Giannini Hall Seismic Safety Corrections P/W Berkeley Evans Hall and Hearst Memorial Gymnasium (seismic studies and design through the schematic level) S/P(partial) Irvine Interdisciplinary Sciences Building D/C D/C/E Los Angeles Franz Tower Seismic Renovation C P/W/C Los Angeles CHS-NPI Seismic Correction C P/W/C San Francisco Mission Center Building Seismic Life D/C C Safety Improvements San Francisco Health Sciences Instructional & Research D Life Safety Improvements Total (Capital Projects) $148 million $116.5 million Systemwide Deferred Maintenance $ 50 million Total $198million $116.5 million A brief summary of the projects may be found in Attachment 1. Future Actions Approval of external financing associated with the State General Funds will be subject to a future Regents action in the spring of Under provisions of the Education Code, the Department of Finance will submit a final list of approved capital outlay to the University no earlier than April 1, 2017, three months before the commencement of the fiscal year of the planned capital expenditures. This proposal represents only a small portion of UC s total funding need for State-eligible capital improvement projects for The University maintains a continuing commitment to pursue gifts and other potential sources to supplement State funding for construction. There continues to be a significant need for capital project funding, but the debt service for the State projects competes with other demands for State General Funds. While there has been general consensus that the prioritization and submittal of State projects should be managed systemwide, there are also limitations on the level of debt the University can incur. This item serves as the discussion item for the approval of the Budget for State Capital Improvements including the following four projects utilizing State and non-state funds that will seek full budget approval in November 2016: Interdisciplinary Sciences Building, Irvine Campus (refer to Attachment 2) Franz Tower Seismic Renovation, Los Angeles Campus (refer to Attachment 3) CHS-NPI Seismic Correction, Los Angeles Campus (refer to Attachment 4) 2 A Key to Acronyms may be found at the end of this document.

5 FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES -5- COMMITTEE September 14, 2016 F3 Mission Center Building Seismic Life Safety Improvements, San Francisco Campus (refer to Attachment 5) It is critical to have the Board approve the capital outlay plan at the November meeting so that discussions with the State may proceed. It should be noted, however, that action on the operating budget will be in the future and if there are insufficient funds available in to adequately fund the basic operating budget, the State-funded capital outlay program for may be truncated. Key to Acronyms GFF General Funds Financed Project phases: S Study P Preliminary Plans (includes Schematic and Design Development) W Working Drawings D Design (used in Design-Build projects) C Construction Attachments: Attachment 1: Attachment 2: Attachment 3: Attachment 4: Attachment 5: Summary of Proposed State Capital Projects Plans for Interdisciplinary Sciences Building, Irvine Campus Plans for Franz Tower Seismic Renovation, Los Angeles Campus Plans for CHS-NPI Seismic Correction, Los Angeles Campus Plans for Mission Center Building Seismic Life Safety Improvements, San Francisco Campus

6 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED STATE CAPITAL PROJECTS Attachment 1 UC Berkeley. The proposed Berkeley program will address high-priority seismic and life safety issues on the campus. The program is composed of: (1) 2223 Fulton Seismic Demolition; (2) preliminary plans and working drawings for the Giannini Hall Seismic Safety Corrections; and (3) a remediation project that will fund seismic studies and design through the schematic level for Evans Hall and Hearst Memorial Gymnasium; both buildings include classroom space and academic offices. UC Irvine. The proposed Irvine Interdisciplinary Sciences Building project will accommodate growth in the Schools of Engineering, Physical Sciences, and Information & Computer Sciences. Since , the combined undergraduate enrollment in these three Schools has increased 62 percent, compared to 21 percent for the campus. The proposed project would provide 133,000 gross square feet of teaching space, research and scholarly activity space, academic and administrative offices, and support space to address the most urgent space needs associated with enrollment and program growth in the three Schools. Along with the requested use of the State GFF funding mechanism, this project is also being supported by non-state resources, including a sizeable gift that has associated near-term milestones. UCLA. In the proposed Franz Tower Seismic Renovation project, the Los Angeles campus will seismically upgrade Franz Hall Tower (123,723 gross square feet), occupied by the Department of Psychology, from a seismic rating of Level V to Level III (formerly UC Poor to Good ) and will address fire-safety and accessibility deficiencies. The proposed CHS-NPI Seismic Correction project will seismically upgrade the Neuropsychiatric Institute (NPI) structure (292,330 gross square feet) in the Center for the Health Sciences (CHS) to Level III and address fire-safety and accessibility deficiencies. Both projects are also being supported by non-state resources. UC San Francisco. The proposed Mission Center Building Seismic Life Safety Improvements project will remedy a range of exterior issues involving the building s facade system; these material failures affect the physical integrity of the 290,000-gross-square-foot building and require seismic and life safety improvements. This project is also being supported by non-state resources. The proposed Health Sciences Instructional & Research Life Safety Improvements project at Parnassus Heights is seeking funding for the design phase. This project will address several fire and life safety improvements, including sprinklers and improving emergency egress for continued use as a laboratory building.

7 Attachment 2 PLANS FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES BUILDING PROJECT, IRVINE CAMPUS BACKGROUND The University of California, Irvine, proposes construction of the Interdisciplinary Sciences Building, which would provide modern facilities for programs in the Henry Samueli School of Engineering, the Donald Bren School of Information & Computer Sciences, and the School of Physical Sciences. The last building that provided space for any of these units was Engineering Hall, which was completed in Academic Program Henry Samueli School of Engineering The Henry Samueli School of Engineering offers a total of 12 undergraduate degrees and ten graduate degree programs through five departments. Hands-on experience and participation in research play a key role in educating undergraduates. Many courses incorporate a hands-on learning component in the curriculum. The School pursues research that builds on a strong foundation of fundamental engineering areas, ranging from mechanics to electronic devices. Research in the new building will focus on thrust areas within the Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering & Materials Science such as developing technologies that improve the performance of alternative energy sources, improving the energy efficiency of critical systems, biomolecular engineering, genetic engineering, and biomaterials. School of Physical Sciences The School of Physical Sciences offers both professional training and general education, serving a large portion of the campus population. The School provides the introductory courses necessary for incoming students in various majors to achieve the skills necessary for their fields. As a result, 85 percent of UCI s freshmen take Physical Sciences classes during their first two quarters. Teaching becomes much more specialized as the School prepares its majors for careers and entry into graduate and professional programs, and as it trains graduate students to excel at independent discovery and application of knowledge. Six undergraduate majors and four graduate degree programs are offered through the School s four departments. Current research in the School spans a variety of areas, including alternative energy, education innovation, astronomy, atmospheric chemistry, medical technology, climate change, and many other areas of mathematics, physics, and chemistry. Research that will be pursued by Chemistry faculty assigned to the new building will include solar energy conversion and electrochemistry; study of the workings of biomolecules and development of technologies to control, improve, and fix them; development of chemical tools and non-invasive imaging strategies to study immune

8 function; and modeling of ultrafast dynamics and relaxation processes of large molecules, biological complexes, and semiconductors. Donald Bren School of Information & Computer Sciences The Donald Bren School of Information & Computer Sciences (ICS) was established as a department in In 2002, it became the University of California s first computer science school, and it remains the only computing-focused school in the UC system. Consisting of three departments (Computer Science, Informatics, and Statistics), the School offers seven undergraduate majors and five graduate degree programs. Research areas pursued by ICS faculty and students include a wide array of topics. Investigators who would be housed in the proposed new building would include faculty working in biomedical informatics and computational biology and other big data areas; this would facilitate collaboration with the Engineering and Physical Sciences research teams in the building to address key societal issues. Project Drivers Growth in these three Schools has far outpaced growth of the campus as a whole. Since , the combined undergraduate enrollments of Engineering, ICS, and Physical Sciences have increased 62 percent, compared to 21 percent for the campus. As a result, these three Schools now represent 33 percent of total undergraduate enrollment, compared to 24 percent in Faculty growth in these Schools has not kept pace with enrollment growth, resulting in substantial increases in the student-faculty ratio. To address this imbalance and accommodate modest enrollment increases, the campus intends to recruit a total of 88 new faculty in these disciplines by Along with the requested use of the GFF funding mechanism, this project is also being supported by non-state resources, including gift funds, external financing and indirect cost recovery. It is urgent that the project move forward on the proposed schedule as the gift commitment is tied to this timeline. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Interdisciplinary Sciences Building project will construct approximately 133,000 gross square feet of instructional computer laboratories, wet laboratory and associated support space, research office and scholarly activity space, and academic and administrative office and support space. Instructional Laboratories. The proposed project would provide two new class laboratories, designed to accommodate 50 students each, for classes offered by the Donald Bren School of Information & Computer Sciences. The laboratories would be designed with appropriate telecommunications and audio-visual equipment to support the instructional program.

9 Research and Scholarly Activity. Flexible wet laboratory modules would be constructed to support research activities of the Schools of Engineering and Physical Sciences. Support space would include space for autoclaves, controlled-temperature rooms, microscopy, tissue culture, and light fabrication. Scholarly activity and research office spaces would be provided to support the programs in the building and would be designed in a combination of shared office and open landscape. Academic and Administrative Offices, and Office Support. Academic office space would be constructed to support the faculty conducting research in the building. Administrative office space would be provided to accommodate the departmental offices of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science and Statistics, as well as other support personnel, and support space would include mail and copy rooms, storage space, and conference rooms. Shared Space. Two shared meeting and event spaces would be provided, including a 110-seat auditorium and a 75-seat colloquium room. The auditorium would be designed with sloped floor, fixed seats, control room, and supporting pre-function space. The colloquium room would be a flat-floored room with movable furnishings to allow for a variety of configurations. Project Implementation The project will be implemented using a design-build delivery process. After budget approval, the campus will prepare an extensive bid package that outlines the detailed requirements for the project, including functional space requirements, design criteria for architecture, performance criteria for building systems, and site development and utility requirements. This package will be issued to prequalified design-build teams who will develop and submit preliminary plans and costs as part of the design-build competition. Operation and Maintenance Campus design guidelines for new buildings emphasize the use of durable materials and equipment with the intent that no major maintenance is required for 20 years or more. The campus has budgeted for the operation and maintenance of the proposed project as part of its operating budget.

10 Site The project site is located in the Physical Sciences area of the campus, on existing Parking Lot 12B, and adjacent to the Physical Sciences Classroom Building (to the north) and the Multipurpose Science & Technology Building (to the south).

11 Attachment 3 PLANS FOR FRANZ TOWER SEISMIC RENOVATION PROJECT, LOS ANGELES CAMPUS BACKGROUND The University of California, Los Angeles proposes to provide seismic corrections and program improvements to the Franz Hall Tower, a high-rise structure with a Level V (formerly UC Poor ) seismic performance rating. Seismic deficiencies are due to inadequate shear capacity in the above-grade levels of the building. Significant structural damage is anticipated in the event of a moderate to large earthquake. Mandatory code corrections triggered by the structural work would include disabled access upgrades and fire and life safety improvements. Upon completion of the work, the seismic performance rating would be upgraded to Level III (formerly UC "Good ). The 123,723-gross-square-foot building, comprising eight stories (plus penthouse) and three below-grade levels, has not been structurally upgraded or renovated since it was built in It is occupied by academic programs of the Department of Psychology of the College of Letters and Science. Space types currently located on the above-grade levels include dry research laboratories, faculty and staff offices, classrooms, meeting rooms, scholarly activity space, and a child care center. Along with the requested use of the State GFF funding mechanism, this project is also being supported by non-state resources, including campus funds and external financing. Campus funds are specifically from a centrally managed pool of unrestricted funds (non-state, non-tuition). These funds are derived from a variety of sources, including indirect cost recovery on sponsored contracts and grants, gift assessments, and investment earnings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project components described below reflect the most critical facility needs for the seismic correction of Franz Hall Tower as identified during project planning and preliminary engineering studies. The exact seismic solution will be the subject of further assessment during design and limited by projected construction market conditions at the time of bid. The scope of the seismic strengthening work would include installation of braced shockabsorbing dampers; fiber wrapping and concrete jacketing of select columns; construction of accessible single occupancy restrooms; upgrades along the path of travel in the project area; and provision of a fire control room in the building. Related repairs and restoration scope would include reconfiguration of walls; modifications to building systems; and replacement of ceilings, lighting, and finishes in areas affected by the work. This portion of the project would be funded by the State GFF mechanism. The mandatory corrective work provides an opportunity to make program improvements for the Department of Psychology. Improvements to select areas on the above-grade floors (not directly

12 affected by the seismic scope) would include reconfiguration of walls to improve space utilization and functionality; modifications to building systems; and replacement of ceilings, lighting, and finishes. This portion of the project would be funded with non-state resources. Construction Impacts Construction would be sequenced to allow ranges of floors to be occupied during construction. The affected occupants would be temporarily relocated within the Franz complex and other campus facilities under separate projects funded with non-state resources. The child care facility would permanently relocate to another campus facility prior to the commencement of work, also under a separate project funded with non-state resources. The basement levels of the tower and the other buildings in the complex would remain operational during construction. Disruptive work would be performed off-hours to minimize impacts to occupants remaining in the building during construction. Site

13 Attachment 4 PLANS FOR CHS-NPI SEISMIC CORRECTION PROJECT, LOS ANGELES CAMPUS BACKGROUND The University of California, Los Angeles proposes to seismically upgrade the Neuropsychiatric Institute (NPI) building in the Center for the Health Sciences (CHS), which has a Level V seismic rating (formerly UC Poor ). Seismic deficiencies include lack of capacity in the concrete shear walls, a strong-beam weak-column condition in the exterior frames, and inadequate load paths. Mandatory code corrections triggered by the structural work would include disabled access upgrades and fire and life safety improvements. Upon completion of the work, the seismic rating would be upgraded to Level III (formerly UC Good ). The NPI building is a 292,330-gross-square-foot structure consisting of an 11-story tower and a one-story low-rise wing. The tower and low-rise wing were constructed in 1958, and four additional tower levels, a penthouse, and an addition to the low-rise wing were built in The addition to the low-rise wing was demolished in 2010 to accommodate the construction of the Wasserman Building. The building has not been structurally upgraded since it was constructed in phases between 1958 and It is primarily occupied by academic programs of the Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior and the School of Medicine, as well as the UCLA Medical Center. Space types include faculty and staff offices, research laboratories, meeting rooms, an auditorium, study space, exam rooms, and animal quarters. The structure is fully occupied and would continue to be occupied by academic (90 percent of space) and medical center programs (ten percent of space) in the future. Along with the requested use of the State GFF funding mechanism, this project is also being supported by non-state resources, including campus funds, hospital reserves, and external financing. Campus funds are specifically from a centrally managed pool of unrestricted funds (non-state, non-tuition). These funds are derived from a variety of sources, including indirect cost recovery on sponsored contracts and grants, gift assessments, and investment earnings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project components described below reflect the most critical facility needs for the seismic correction of NPI as identified during project planning and preliminary engineering studies. The exact seismic solution will be the subject of further assessment during design and limited by projected construction market conditions at the time of bid. The seismic upgrade would involve the construction of new shear walls, the fiber wrapping of structural elements (columns, slabs, and coupling beams) to increase their strength and stiffness, and the bolting of structural elements to each other at select locations. It is currently anticipated that the work would be performed entirely on the interior of the building.

14 Construction of the shear walls would involve modifications to the existing concrete footings. The project would also involve potential repairs to the parapet, and the potential correction of exterior falling hazards due to inadequately anchored masonry veneer around the perimeter of the building. Fire and life safety improvements would include replacement of obsolete fire alarm devices in the area to be vacated by the Neuro-Rehabilitation Unit on the west wing of the first floor and related connections and upgrades to fire and life safety infrastructure within the building and adjacent CHS complex as required by the Fire Marshal. Mandatory accessibility upgrades required by the seismic work would include the following: construction of a pair of single occupancy toilets as required on the first floor and floors four through eight; installation of code-compliant drinking fountains, where required; replacement of exit doors and installation of panic hardware and tactile exit signage along the path of travel; and provision of code-compliant handrails and arrival lanterns in the passenger elevators. The project would also provide code-compliant handrails and guardrails, provide stair striping, and modify door openings and hardware in the stairwells. The scope of work to complete the seismic corrections and non-structural upgrades described above would include relocation of utilities obstructing the proposed work; repair and replacement of waterproofing and flashing; repairs to interior and exterior finishes; abatement of hazardous materials; and provision of fire safing and shaft repair where required. Site

15 PLANS FOR MISSION CENTER BUILDING SEISMIC LIFE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, SAN FRANCISCO CAMPUS BACKGROUND Attachment 5 The University of California, San Francisco proposes the Mission Center Building Seismic Life Safety Improvements project to remediate a range of exterior issues involving the building facade system at the Mission Center Building (MCB). Material failures are affecting the physical integrity of the building and require seismic and life safety improvements. Originally constructed in 1927, the MCB is a six-story reinforced concrete frame structure with brick masonry cladding on all facades. The building footprint is approximately 256 feet by 195 feet, comprising a total of approximately 290,000 gross square feet in size. The building is occupied by multiple groups comprising academic and administrative office and support, research laboratories, and public service spaces. The brickwork is cracked in many areas and has been displaced in some cases due to failed anchors. In other areas, bricks have spalled due to corroded metal tie wires and failed mortar. The mortar joints have also failed due to age in some general wall areas and critical areas such as the parapet and top surface of window sills. Steel lintels in many areas are corroded due to water intrusion which has caused cracked and displaced bricks and deteriorated mortar. Concrete spalling has occurred at the head of many window sills due to water intrusion. These areas also have corroded lintels and mortar bed deterioration and brick separation issues. The window investigation uncovered general window parge failures due to water intrusion. These failures are interconnected and need to be addressed together to effect a comprehensive building repair that would bring the best value for investment and ensure a more sustainable structure for the long term. Along with the requested use of the State GFF funding mechanism, this project is also being supported by non-state resources consisting of campus funds, campus funds, specifically, from a centrally managed pool of unrestricted funds (non-state, non-tuition). These funds are derived from a variety of sources, including indirect cost recovery on sponsored contracts and grants, gift assessments, and investment earnings. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The campus has conducted pre-design studies and cost analyses. The project components described below reflect the most critical facility needs for the project as identified during project planning, programming, and cost analysis. The proposed scope would remediate the complete façade system to address the issues comprehensively, especially water intrusion, which is the root of most of the problems. The project includes the following components:

16 Brickwork and mortar Repair brick cracks with injected epoxy; replace displaced and spalled brick areas and mortar; install supplemental epoxy anchors; remove and replace failed mortar and repoint. Steel lintels Remove all and reinstall new steel lintels with new sheet metal flashing. Concrete Replace all spalled or deteriorated areas with new concrete patches and reinforcing. Windows Remove and replace all windows with dual pane units with sill pan flashings that extend over the parge. The design-build delivery model has been identified as the appropriate mechanism for risk mitigation. Site The MCB is located at 1855 Folsom Street in the northeast portion of San Francisco s mixed-use Mission District. It is located approximately three miles east of Parnassus Heights, 1.25 miles west of Mission Bay, and one mile northeast of Zuckerberg San Francisco General. The building s west and south façades front Folsom and 15th Streets, with its east façade fronting an entry plaza and adjoining surface parking.