Progressive Multi-Family Design: New Opportunities for Light Frame Mid-Rise Structures. Workshop
|
|
- Griffin Stone
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Progressive Multi-Family Design: New Opportunities for Light Frame Mid-Rise Structures Workshop
2 The Wood Products Council is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems (AIA/CES), Provider #G516. Credit(s) earned on completion of this course will be reported to AIA CES for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non-aia members are available upon request. This course is registered with AIA CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product. Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.
3 Workshop Description Updates to the California Building Code along with the availability of innovative new products have created opportunities for designers to add value to their mixed-use and multi-family projects by increasing scale and improving aesthetics. This workshop will introduce a new code allowance for additional stories in podium structures and review specific ways it can impact building designs. Referencing built projects and common design techniques, discussion will cover fire-rated detailing provisions, including those relevant to the detailing of wood shaft walls, and options for cost-effectively integrating mass timber into projects that are otherwise light wood-frame. Code provisions related to safety during construction will also be reviewed to demonstrate how to minimize the risk of fire on large wood projects.
4 Learning Objectives 1. Determine the design Challenges and solutions using a multi-story podium under four and five stories of wood-frame construction, using references to built examples 2. Discuss opportunities and requirements for wood shaft wall designs, including detailing options, cost benefits and relevant code provisions. 3. Investigate opportunities for combining wood-frame and mass timber solutions in multi-family midrise applications in order to take advantage of the aesthetics and speed of mass timber while deriving the economic benefits of wood-frame 4.Review 2015 IBC Chapter 33 provisions regarding construction safety that can minimize on-site risk of construction fires on large wood projects.
5 Integrating Mass Timber Elements into Traditional Multi- Family: Exploring Cost, Code and the User Experience Ted Panton, GGLO Disclaimer: This presentation was developed by a third party and is not funded by WoodWorks or the Softwood Lumber Board.
6 OVERVIEW WOODWORKS FEBRUARY 2017
7
8 Why would we apply this in a multifamily program setting? WHY?
9 In modern US construction, wood has been used primarily as an economical solution for the superstructure of projects. WHY?
10 Yet it has design characteristics that are desirable in many ways, and in many applications. MATERIALITY WHY?
11 WHY? LEVERAGE SUPERSTRUCTURE FOR PERFORMANCE SUSTAINABILITY LIVEABILITY
12 PERFORMANCE optimize design benefits maintain the delivery aspects of a typical wood multifamily structure.
13 SUSTAINABILITY Embedded sustainable attributes. MATERIALITY
14 SUSTAINABILITY Wood structures currently achieve Floor Area Ratios of up to 6, which can provide densities of over 250 dwelling units per acre. MATERIALITY Mass timber will help to make this level of density both affordable and desirable.
15 LIVEABILITY multifamily dwellings can be perceived by users as institutional and lacking in livability. With the CLT hybrid concept, the warmth of wood can be introduced to residential occupants, to their benefit and well-being. MATERIALITY
16 HOW?
17
18 compelling Design attributes
19 compelling Design attributes Approvable i.e. can readily attain agency approval
20 compelling Design attributes Approvable i.e. can readily attain agency approval Cost i.e. comparable with existing currently used materials AND
21 compelling Design attributes Approvable i.e. can readily attain agency approval Cost i.e. comparable with existing currently used materials AND with no adverse impacts to other systems
22 relevance compelling Design attributes Approvable i.e. can readily attain agency approval Cost i.e. comparable with existing currently used materials AND with no adverse impacts to other systems
23 HOW = Take advantage of design strengths Get it legal / approvable Manage cost
24 FEASIBILITY/COST
25
26 AND with no adverse impacts to other systems
27 AND with no adverse impacts to other systems
28 CRITIQUE: ALL-CLT SYSTEM
29 SIMPLICITY ELEGANCE PRECISION
30 TECTONIC QUALITIES
31 TECTONIC QUALITIES
32 TECTONIC QUALITIES
33 MULTIFAMILY USE
34 IMPERMEABLE
35 IMPERMEABLE
36 IMPERMEABLE
37 IMPERMEABLE
38 ALL-CLT CRITIQUE CONCLUSION:
39 ALL-CLT CRITIQUE CONCLUSION: MONOLITHIC, ROBUST STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
40 ALL-CLT CRITIQUE CONCLUSION: MONOLITHIC, ROBUST STRUCTURAL SYSTEM TECTONIC QUALITIES INSPIRES DESIGN AND CRAFT
41 ALL-CLT CRITIQUE CONCLUSION: MONOLITHIC, ROBUST STRUCTURAL SYSTEM TECTONIC QUALITIES INSPIRES DESIGN AND CRAFT POTENTIAL FOR INTEGRAL INTERIOR FINISH RATED AS TYPE IV HT/ 1 HR
42 CONS:
43 CONS: RELATIVELY EXPENSIVE SUPERSTRUCTURE
44 CONS: RELATIVELY EXPENSIVE SUPERSTRUCTURE REQUIRES ADDITIONAL FURRING TO ACCOMODATE PLUMBING/HVAC
45 CONS: RELATIVELY EXPENSIVE SUPERSTRUCTURE REQUIRES ADDITIONAL FURRING TO ACCOMODATE PLUMBING/HVAC CURRENTLY NO PATH FOR SATISFYING LATERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (SEATTLE)
46 CRITIQUE: CONVENTIONAL FRAMING
47 INEXPENSIVE
48 EFFECTIVE FRAMEWORK FOR OTHER TRADES
49 UTILITARIAN (VS CRAFTED)
50 REQUIRED TO BE COVERED
51 CONVENTIONAL FRAMING PROS:
52 CONVENTIONAL FRAMING PROS: INEXPENSIVE
53 CONVENTIONAL FRAMING PROS: INEXPENSIVE FLEXIBILITY IS VALUABLE
54 CONVENTIONAL FRAMING PROS: INEXPENSIVE FLEXIBILITY IS VALUABLE OTHER TRADES MAKE USE OF RESULTANT VOID SPACES
55 CONVENTIONAL FRAMING PROS: INEXPENSIVE FLEXIBILITY IS VALUABLE OTHER TRADES MAKE USE OF RESULTANT VOID SPACES WIDELY AVAILABLE
56 OPEN FRAMING CONS:
57 OPEN FRAMING CONS: AESTHETICALLY UTILITARIAN
58 OPEN FRAMING CONS: AESTHETICALLY UTILITARIAN IF RATED, CANNOT BE EXPOSED
59 MERGE
60 MERGE
61 DRY ZONE WET ZONE CLT HYBRID SOLUTION/ PLAN
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73 CASE STUDY
74 MATERIALITY CLT CASE STUDY
75 MATERIALITY CLT CASE STUDY 40 LU zone 6,400 sq. ft. FAR = 2.0
76 MATERIALITY $165/ SQ. FT. CLT CASE STUDY
77 MATERIALITY $185/ SQ. FT. CLT CASE STUDY
78 SITE
79
80
81 CLT CASE STUDY SITE
82 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK
83 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK
84 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK
85 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK
86 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK
87 CLT CASE STUDY
88 SITE
89 EXISTING APARTMENT BUILDING
90
91 CLT CASE STUDY
92 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY CLT HYBRID SOLUTION
93
94 CLT HYBRID SOLUTION
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118 SOFT STORY AND TRANSFER
119 SOFT STORY
120 SOFT STORY
121 SOFT STORY
122 SOFT STORY
123 SOFT STORY STORY OOOPS!
124 SOFT STORY STORY OOOPS!
125 SHEAR
126 CITY OF SEATTLE WILL NOT ACCEPT PANELS FOR SHEAR. SHEAR
127 PODIUM TRANSFER
128 PODIUM TRANSFER
129 PODIUM SUITABLE FOR TRANSFERRING GRAVITY LOADS, BUT NOT ACCEPTED FOR SHEAR SOFT STORY
130 SOFT STORY
131 SOFT STORY
132 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY OTHER TAKEAWAYS
133 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN DUE TO RIGIDITY, CAN HAVE EXPOSED OUTSIDE CORNER This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY
134 CLT CASE STUDY
135 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN POTENTIAL FOR EXPRESSIVE ROOF ELEMENT This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY
136 COST
137 COST
138 $15.35/ FT COST
139 $15.35/ FT Domestic Visual Quality (Wsi) - the surface lamella are planed and sanded to achieve appearance class A/B in accordance with BS EN COST
140 $15.35/ FT-MASS TIMBER $8-10/ FT-CONVENTIONAL FRAMING $12/ FT-AVERAGE ROUGH FRAMING HARDCOST APPROX 6.5% OF CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL COST
141 VERTICAL ENVELOPE
142 One significant takeaway from the proposed concept is the increase in the usability of the vertical envelope for wood structures.
143 This equates to increased livability (and revenue) for projects. MATERIALITY
144 ENHANCED CEILING HEIGHTS WITHIN RESIDENTIAL SPACE A typical wood floor assembly is almost 15. In living spaces, our CLT hybrid concept would be 9, a savings in vertical height of approximately 6 per floor. MATERIALITY
145 ENHANCED CEILING HEIGHTS WITHIN RESIDENTIAL SPACE Over 7 to 8 floors this can be substantial, especially with land use and building height envelope being at a premium.
146 15
147 15
148 14 7/8
149
150 1.3 CONCRETE, UNDERLAYMENT 5 PLY CLT PANEL 7
151 VERTICAL CONSTRAINTS: WHICH IS MOST RESTRICTIVE? LAND USE: IN MOST CASES LAND USE DATUMS ARE TAKEN FROM AVERAGE EXISTING GRADE, WHICH IS VERY INFLEXIBLE. FIRE: CRITICAL DATUM IS 75 FOR HIGHEST FLOOR ABOVE LOWEST ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAY. THIS IS THE THRESHOLD FOR HIGH RISE DEFINITION. IBC: TENDS TO BE FORGIVING, GIVEN GRADE IS TAKEN AFTER CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
152 LOW RISE FAR 1 TO 3.25 CAN BE ALL WOOD
153 MATERIALITY MID RISE FAR 3 TO 6 PODIUM BUILDING
154 LAND USE LAND USE DATUM
155 LAND USE LAND USE DATUM
156 CLT HYBRID PROFILE LAND USE DATUM
157 SOLVING FOR DESIGN-BUILD The open-framed wet areas would provide coordination zones for trades to function in. This would mean that plumbers, electricians and other trades could approach the project just as they would any other framed project.
158 GRAVITY SYSTEMS TYPE V 1 hr
159 GRAVITY SYSTEMS
160 SUPPLY SYSTEMS
161 LIVING ZONE
162 LIVING ZONE
163 DESIGN
164 EXPOSED STRUCTURE This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. A finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. MATERIALITY Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance.
165
166 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY LIVING ZONE
167 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY
168 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN ILLUMINATION This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY
169 PLUMB RESIDENTIAL DESIGN This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY
170 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY VENT
171 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY LEDGER
172 LEDGER/RECEIVING PLATE
173 MATERIALITY
174 CULTURAL ASSOCIATIONS
175 MATERIALITY IN POPULAR CULTURE
176 IN POPULAR CULTURE IN POPULAR CULTURE
177 MATERIALITY IN POPULAR CULTURE IN POPULAR CULTURE
178 IN POPULAR CULTURE
179 MATERIALITY A GREAT DESIGN TOOL
180 MATERIALITY A GREAT DESIGN TOOL
181 concrete steel wood glass PAIRINGS
182 PAIRINGS
183 SIMPLICITY
184 MATERIALITY IMMERSIVENESS
185 LOG CABIN EFFECT?
186 MATERIALITY
187 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY BALANCE
188 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN This aspect of our CLT proposal is the most distinctive. Having a finished CLT ceiling that is washed in warm light would provide a strong design feature in a high-touch area. Given that CLT performs to 1 hour, no other layers of materials (i.e. sheetrock) are needed to attain code compliance. MATERIALITY
189 CLT CASE STUDY THANK YOU