Hampton Township School District High School Feasibility Study. Final Feasibility Study Presentation. VEBH Architects

Transcription

1 2018 High School Feasibility Study Final Feasibility Study Presentation January 28,

2 Study Updates I. Latest HS Concepts for Academic / Wellness Redesign II. Associated Conceptual Construction Costs III. PDE Reimbursement Discussion IV. Campus Survey (Phase 1) V. Potential Timeline / Next Steps 2

3 Academic Redesign Deeper-Learning Focus Project Based Learning Experiences Design Thinking Across and Between Courses Complex Problem Solving Develop World-Class Skills Wellness & General Well-Being Connected Services (Health and Behavioral Health) Wellness Focus Environment of Respect and Dignity for All 3

4 I. High School Academic / Wellness Redesign 4

5 Potential Additions Main Entry 8 SITE UTILIZATION & CIRCULATION 5

6 HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC/WELLNESS CONCEPTUAL REDESIGN Big Picture Functional Impact Areas: 1 ADMIN/ WELLNESS HUB 2 ENGINEERING/ DESIGN 3 LIBRARY/ MEDIA 4 SCIENCE 5 PERFORMING ARTS 6 COMMONS / CAFETERIA & KITCHEN 7 PHYS-ED/ ATHLETICS 8 SITE UTILIZATION & CIRCULATION 6

7 HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC/WELLNESS CONCEPTUAL REDESIGN Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 7

8 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 1 ADMIN / WELLNESS HUB 8

9 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 1 ADMIN / WELLNESS HUB 9

10 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 2 ENGINEERING / DESIGN LAB 10

11 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 2 ENGINEERING / DESIGN LAB 11

12 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 3 LIBRARY / MEDIA CENTER 12

13 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 3 LIBRARY / MEDIA CENTER 13

14 LIBRARY / MEDIA CENTER ADDITION Potential Skylights/Light Monitors Clerestory Windows Borrowed Light Windows at Existing Classrooms Examples of Clerestory Windows in Libraries Examples of Daylighting Tubes (potential new & existing building applications) 14

15 <intentionally blank> 15

16 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 4 SCIENCE 16

17 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 4 SCIENCE 17

18 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 5 PERFORMING ARTS 18

19 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 5 PERFORMING ARTS 19

20 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. ENLARGED MUSIC 20

21 <intentionally blank> 21

22 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 6 COMMONS / CAFETERIA & KITCHEN 22

23 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 6 COMMONS / CAFETERIA & KITCHEN 23

24 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 7 PHYS-ED / ATHLETICS 24

25 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 7 PHYS-ED / ATHLETICS 25

26 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 7A PHYS-ED / ATHLETICS 26

27 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 7B PHYS-ED / ATHLETICS 27

28 GOLD FIELD Potential Additions Main Entry BLUE FIELD EXISTING SITE UTILIZATION PLAN 28

29 High School Site Activity & Support Needs: Paved practice facility for Marching Band Restroom facilities accessible for after hours fields use Improved parking & circulation to support athletic and event use Safe & adequate lighting 29

30 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. 8 SITE UTILIZATION & CIRCULATION 30

31 <intentionally blank> 31

32 Fridley Site Activity & Support Facilities Needs: More inclusive locker facilities to support girls & boys soccer, lacrosse, and track & field use of field for both practice & games Flexible home/visitor locker facilities with appropriate restrooms & showers Dedicated coach & officials facilities Improved trainers area with adjacent athletic conditioning room Appropriate storage for athletic equipment, uniforms, & field maintenance equipment Team meeting area Miscellaneous concrete sidewalk repairs Track resurfacing New synthetic turf 32

33 FIELD HOUSE GARAGE Fridley Field TOPNICK DRIVE 33

34 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. FRIDLEY FIELDHOUSE CONCEPT DIAGRAM 1 ST FLOOR 34

35 Building floor plans have been removed from this publication. FRIDLEY FIELDHOUSE CONCEPT DIAGRAM 2 nd FLOOR 35

36 II. Associated Conceptual Cost Summary Costing Categories: A. REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE WORK B. INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION/UPGRADES (Minimum PlanCon Reimbursable Project) C. ACADEMIC/WELLNESS REDESIGN D. FRIDLEY FIELDHOUSE 36

37 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE HIGH SCHOOL SCOPE QTY UNIT COST A REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE WORK ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION COST CONSTRUCTION COST RANGE LOW (5%) HIGH(5%) Miscellaneous Safety,Security & Infrastructure Items: Safety & Security (interior & exterior doors & hardware, cross-corridor doors,access control system, video surveillance, glazing upgrades) MEP (Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing) priority upgrades Auditorium & Gym Sound Systems Pool Equipment Upgrades Kitchen Upgrades 216,302 sf $24.94/sf $5.40M Complete Roof Replacement 221,906 sf lump sum $3.33M Site Pavement and Lighting (including site reorganization) 1 lump sum $2.28M Conceptual Design Contingency 8% $0.88M SUBTOTAL REQ D INFRASTRUCTURE WORK (approx.) $11.88M $ 11.29M $12.48M 37

38 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE HIGH SCHOOL SCOPE QTY UNIT COST ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION COST CONSTRUCTION COST RANGE LOW (5%) HIGH(5%) B INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION / UPGRADES (Minimum PlanCon Project) Classroom and Corridor Finishes Classroom Casework & Equipment Technology / Communications Systems MEP (Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing) comprehensive upgrades 216,302 sf $66.54/sf $14.39M Conceptual Design Contingency 8% $1.15M SUBTOTAL MODERNIZATION/UPGRADES $15.54M $ 14.77M $16.32M 38

39 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE HIGH SCHOOL SCOPE QTY UNIT COST C ACADEMIC / WELLNESS REDESIGN ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION COST CONSTRUCTION COST RANGE LOW (5%) HIGH(5%) Redesign Categories (renovations / restrooms) 79,969 sf $51.62/sf $4.13M Redesign Categories (additions): Library/Media Center Visitor s Entry/Lockers Natatorium/Gym Entry/Lobby 20,884 sf 14,176 sf 3,288 sf 3,420 sf $220/sf $4.60M Conceptual Design Contingency 8% $0.69M SUBTOTAL ACADEMIC / WELLNESS REDESIGN $9.42M $ 8.95M $9.89M 39

40 CONCEPTUAL COST SUMMARY HIGH SCHOOL SCOPE QTY UNIT COST A REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE WORK ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION COST CONSTRUCTION COST RANGE LOW (5%) HIGH(5%) SUBTOTAL REQ D INFRASTRUCTURE WORK (approx.) $11.88M $ 11.29M $12.48M B INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION / UPGRADES (Minimum PlanCon Project) SUBTOTAL MODERNIZATION/UPGRADES $15.54M $ 14.77M $16.32M C ACADEMIC / WELLNESS REDESIGN SUBTOTAL FUNCTIONAL REORGANIZATION $9.42M $ 8.95M $9.89M TOTAL CONCEPTUAL COSTS HIGH SCHOOL * $35.01M $38.69 * Excludes associated soft costs of approximately 20% (Approx. value of $7.00M $7.74M) 40

41 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE FRIDLEY FIELDHOUSE D1 FRIDLEY FIELDHOUSE SCOPE QTY UNIT COST ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION COST CONSTRUCTION COST RANGE LOW (5%) HIGH(5%) Provide locker rooms for all school field sports&officials, athletic storage, field maintenance storage, training, conditioning, etc.: Upgrade Existing Fieldhouse 2,592 sf $ $0.44M Fieldhouse Addition (1 st Floor) 10,950 sf $ $2.19M Fieldhouse related Sitework 1 allowance $0.22M Conceptual Design Contingency SUBTOTAL FIELDHOUSE 8% $0.23M $3.08M D1- TOTAL CONCEPTUAL COSTS FRIDLEY FIELDHOUSE* $2.93M $3.23M D2 FRIDLEY FIELDHOUSE + 2 ND FLOOR Fieldhouse Addition (2 nd Floor) 6,100 sf $ $1.22M Conceptual Design Contingency SUBTOTAL FIELDHOUSE(D1 + 2 nd Floor) 8% $0.10M $4.40M D2-TOTALCONCEPTUAL COSTS FRIDLEY FIELDHOUSE + 2 ND FLOOR* $4.18M $4.62M * Excludes associated soft costs of approximately 20% (D1 Approx. value of $0.59M $0.65M & D2 approx. value of $0.84M -$0.92M) 41

42 III. PDE Reimbursement Discussion Future of PlanConlooks more reassuring than it has in the recent past There is money in the program projects in the cue are receiving their reimbursement payments and the Department anticipates continued funding/payments in the future There is still a question about what new process will look like but it appears it will be similar to prior program best case scenario new program may be launched in the fall We were advised it may be in District s best interest to be ready with a PlanConA/B Submission July 1 if there is a window where moratorium expires & has not been reinstated otherwise be ready under new system when it becomes available Note: Comments based on phone conversation w/ Jim Vogel at PDE on 12/21/18 42

43 IV. Phase 1 Survey Update Note: Recommend having solicitor review & check for any additional covenants or restrictions 43

44 V. Potential Timeline / Next Steps Traditional Normal Project Length Approx Months months design phase months construction phase Board Accept the Feasibility Study February Retain Architect (prior to PlanCon A submission) 44