g. ^^r^ -fi. Committee scrutinised

Transcription

1 The State Governmen Committee scrutinised Sr.No : had appointed Document Verification Committee for the Pre Mix Food Tender. The all the documents and seen the CD's of all 65 proposers. The committee has recommended the folkwing 15 proposers those who are eligible for the second stage of RFP, i.e. Plant Inspection. All the elig ble proposers listed below to kindly note that their Premix Production plant will be inspected by the Tech nical Committee approved by the Govt. from 14 September 2017 onwards. All the proposers will be intimated one day before the plant inspection by the technical committee. All the eligible proposers are hereby ntimated to be ready with functional units during the inspection of their plant. The samples will also be c ^llected for lab testing to match the specifications mentioned in the RFP The List of Eligible Proposers Name of Bidder Shree Dattaguru Swami Swayamsahyata Bachat gat, Kolhapur Moreshwar Mahila Jalana Khushi Mahila Kolhapur i g Maharashtra Mahila Sahakari Gruhudyog /sahakari Sanstha, Dhule unit 1 MIDC plot nod 117/118 and unit 2 MIDC plot no 202/203 Gayatri gat, Amaravati Renuka Mahila Beed Jagruti Pragati Mahila Latur Gauri Mahila Hingoli Stri Aadhar Mahila Mandal, Pune Vyankateshwar Mahila Audyogik Sahakari Sanstha, Udgir Dist- Latur Unit no 1 Kapsi khurd and Unit 2 Dhuti Nagpur Mahalxmi Mahila Audyogik Sahakari Sanstha, Nanded Unit no 1 and Unit no 2 Nari Niketan Mahila Mandal Nanded Shravan Mahila Kolhapur Vaishnvi Mata Gat Sillod Dist Auranbad Aarati gat Pune ' ^^r^ -fi Commissioner, Integrated Child Development Services Scheme Maharashtra State, Navi Mumbai

2 The State Government had appointed Document Verification Committee for the Pre Mix Food Tender. They scrutinised all the documents and seen the CD's of all 65 propsoers. The committee has recommended that the following 50 proposers are ineligible and hence are declared ineligible for the Second Stage of Plant Inspection. Those proposers who have any objection on the decision of the committe may appeal to the ICDS Commissioner in 7 working days from the date of publication of this list. Any appeal received after this deadline shall not be considered Sr. No 1 Name of Bidder Indira Mahila Risangaon loha Dist- Nanded Bidder has not submitted following documents-: 1. Required Machineries are not installed as per the from the Chartered Engineer List of Ineligible Bidders 2. In-house Laboratory is not installed. 3. Technical personnel is not engaged. Reasort for ineligible 4. Balance Sheet is not certified by Chartered Accountant. 2 3 Jyoti Mahila Mandal, Kandivali Mumbai Jay Yogeswar Gat Nandurbar Bidder has not submitted following documents-: 1. Chartered Engineer mentions THR Plant instead of Premix Plant, 2. In-house Laboratory is not installed. Technical personnel is not engaged. 3.Plant does not comply with the tender requirements 1. Required Machineries are not installed as per the from the Chartered Engineer 2. In-house Laboratory is not installed. Technical personnel is not engaged. 3. Balance Sheet is not certified by the Chartered Accountant Vikas Mahila Bachat Gat Panvel Dist. Thane Gautami Mahila TriMurti Mahila YahaRupal Mahila Mandal, Nadurabar Bidder has not submitted the followin^ documents-: I.The bidder have not taken FDA licence on production unit as per documets FDA and Chartered Engineer shown different address. 2.Required Machineries are not installed as per the Chartered Engineer. 3. Credit Worthiness is not submitted. 4. All required ISO certificates are not submitted. 1. Chartered Engineer not submitted. 2.Technical personnel is not engaged. 3.Credit Worthiness is not submitted. 4.Blue Print is not submitted. 1. Chartered Engineer has issued s on the basis of quotation and documents submitted by the bidderare not on the basis of plant inspection. 2. In-house Laboratory is not in place. Technical personnel is not engaged. 3. MPCB licence is for Sattu and Sheera and not for premix. 1. Chartered Engineer has issued s on the basis of quotation and documents submitted by the bidder and not on the basis of plant inspection. 2. Required Machineries are not installed as per the Chartered Engineer. 3. Bidder has submitted Consent to Establish. Consent ot operate is not submitted 4. All required ISO certificates are not submitted.

3 8 Jay Bhavani Gat, Beed 1. Bidder has not submitted MPCB Licence 2. Rent Agreement is for only 11 months whereas the Tender period is for 5 years. 3. The certificates and licences shown have different addresses. 4. ISO s are not on the address of the Plant Unit Parivaratan Gat, Sujata Swayamsahyata Washim 1. Chartered Engineer has issued s on the basis of quotation and documents submitted by the bidder and not on the basis of plant inspection. 2.Chartered Engineer shows THR Plant instead of Premix Plant 3. in-house Laboratory is not installed 4. Bidder has not certified shelf-life of the product. 5. Blue print of plant is not certified by, FDA or Chartered Engineer. Bidder has not submitted following documents-:. 2. In-house Laboratory is not installed 3. of Shelf life of the products is not provided. 4. of publice laibility insurance or consent letter is not provided.' Vikash Magasvargiy Gat, Sankalp Siddhi Swayam Sahyata Mahila Aurangabad Girija Mahila Aurangabad Apeksha Mahila Prerana Mahila Gadchiroli Bidder has not submirted the following documents-: 1. Chartered Engineer has issued s on the basis of quotation and documents submitted by the bidder and not on the basis of plant inspection 2. In-house Laboratory is not installed 4.Bidder has not submitted Affadavit as per given annexures. 5. Turnover certificate by Chartered Accountant is not provided 6. Performance certificate issued by Commissionerate is not provided 7. Blue Print of the production unit by FDA or CE is not provided 8. Consent to operate issued by MPCB is not provided Bidder has not submitted the followinq documents-: 1. Required Machineries are not installed as per the Chartered Engineer 2. All ISO certificates are not submitted S.Licence of MPCB for THR only not for Premix 1. Required Machineries are not installed as per the Chartered Engineer 2. All ISO certificates are not submitted 3. Consent to Operate by MPCB is not provided 1. Chartered Engineer has issued s on the basis of quotation and documents submitted by the bidder not on the basis of plant inspection 2. In-house Laboratory is not installed 4.Bidder has not submitted Affadavit as per given annexures. 5. Turnover certificate by Chartered Accountant is not provided 6. Performance certificate' issued by Commissionerate is not provided 7. Blue Print of the production unit by FDA or CE is not provided 8. Consent to operate issued by MPCB is not provided 1. Chartered Engineer s are not submitted. 2. In-house Laboratory is not installed 3. of Shelf life only for two months instead of 4 months as per the requirements of the tender 4. All ISO s are not submitted.

4 Suvamlaxmi Gat, Solapur Sarswati Mahila Nandurbar Sarswati Mahila Parbhani Jagdamba Gat, Parbhani Pratiksha Mahila Chandrapur Saheli Mahila Kolhapur 2.Minimum 5 years life of Machinery is not certified by Chartered Engineer 3. Not installed In-house Laboratory 4. Blue print in not approved by FDA or CE 2. of MPCB is for THR and not for Premix 1. Required Production unit is not ready and bidder has demanded one month after allocation of work. 1. Required Production unit is not ready and bidder has demanded one month after allocation of work 2. Consent letter of public laibility insurance not submitted 3. All Licences and s are shown different address 1. Chartered Engineer s are not submitted: 2. Balance sheets are not certified by Chartered Accountant. 3. Performance issued by Commissionerate is not provided 4. All ISO certificates are not submitted. 2. All ISO certificates are not submitted 3. Licence of MPCB is for THR and not for Premix 4. Not installed In-house Laboratory 5. Licences and s are showing different addresses Mahalaxmi Gat, Nagpur Sanjivani Mahila Nagpur Sakhi Mahila Bachat gat, Gondia Shubhada Gat, Solapur Bidder has-not submitted the following documents-: 2.Credit Worthiness is not provided 3. All ISO certificates are not submitted. 4 Not installed In-house Laboratory Bidder has not submitted the followin^ documents-: 2.Credit Worthiness is not provided 3. All ISO certificates are not submitted 4 Not installed In-house Laboratory. 5. Balance Sheets are not certified by CA 6. Licences of MPCB are expired 2. Not installed In-house Laboratory 3. Licence of MPCB is not submitted % working capital arrangment is not submitted

5 26 27 Jay Satguru Gat, Goregaon Mumbai Mahima Mahila Chandrapur 2. Shelf-life for EDNF is provided and not for premix food ' 1. Chartered Engineer s are not submitted. 2. FDA Licence and ISO s are showing different addresses 3. Licence of MFCB is not submitted Mahila Sahas, Solapur > Vashnavi Mata Gat, Sillod Dist Aurangabad Khandeshwari Gat, Beed Bhakti Mahila Hingoli Stri Swayamsevi Gat, Aurangbad Sakhi Mahila Bachat gat, Varora Chadrapur Prashik Mahila Prerana Mahila Parner Dist Ahemadnagar 2. Not installed In-house Laboratory (list of equipments is not submitted) 3. Two ISO certificates are not submitted. 4. Licences of MPCB are for flour mill and not for Premix 5. Insurance consent letter is not submitted 5.30% Working capital arrangmet is not submitted 6. Building plan is certified however, the blue print is not certified by FDA/CE. 2. Licence of MPCB is for Sukhadi Sheera and Upma and not for Premix. Bidder has not submitted the followin^ documents-: 2. Address mentioned on the FDA Licence is different from the address of the production unit 3.ln-house Laboratory is not installled, 1. Licences of MPCB is on the name of the landlord and not on the name of Bidder < 2. Blue print is not as per tender requirement 3. One ISO certificate is not submitted 4. Consent to Operate licences is not issued by MPCB 5. Rent Agreement is not for the peiod of 5 years 2. Shelf-life certificate is for THR not for premix 3. In-house Laboratory is not installed i 4. Consent letter of Insurance company is not provided 5. Blue print is not as per the requirements of the tender 1. Chartered Engineer s is not submitted. 2. In-house Laboratory is not installed 3.Performance issued by Commissionerate is not provided 1. Licence of Consent to Operate issued by MPCB is not provided 2. Blue print is not submitted 3. 30% working capital arrangement is not submitted

6 36 Sanmati Mahila Swayam Sahyata Mahila Ahemadnagar 2. Performance issued by Commissionerate is not provided 3.ln-house Laboratory is not installed 4. Consent to operate Licence issued by MPCB is not submitted 5. Balance sheets and Turnover certificate are not certified by CA Ekata Mahila Aurangabad Siddhivinayak Gat Kolhapur Shree Ganesh Gat Aurangabad Priyadarshani Gat Solapur 1. Factory Building is taken on lease for 11 months only. 2. As perthe lease agreement submitted by sanstha iandloard has given possesion to the bidder on 9/8/2017 and sanstha has submitted tender on 11/8/2017. Erection of plant in a short span of 2 days looks very difficult 3. a) Chartered Engineer has mentioned in the certificate that he has visited the plant on 22/7/2017 and the agreement with landlord by bidder mentions that the possesion of the factory building is given on 9/8/2017. It appears that the Chartered Engineer has not visited the plant b) Chartered Engineer has himself given remarks that the RO plant and Chilling plant is yet to be installed, which means that the plant was not ready for production at the time of inspection c) List of Machinery certified by chartered Engineer shows that Sanstha does not have Thermic Fluid Heater which is the most important element in the plant. Also, Sanstha HAS certified that they do not have Thermic Fluid Heater 4. Self stating manufacturing capacity by Sanstha shows their plant address is: Lasur Station, Tal Gangapur, Dist Aurangabad. However, all the licences and Chartered Engineer shows plant addrtess as: Opp. Baliraja Hotel, Lasur Station Road, At post Karoli, Taluka & Dist Aurangbad 5.Consent letter from insurer is not submitted 6.Factory Act- The Factory Act is applicable if organisation has more than 20 employees and labours. The Charte^ed Engineer mentions status of sanstha having 28 Staff and labours. It seems that Sanstha must have License under the Factory Act,.however, sanstha has mentioned in their bid that the factory act is not applicable to them and therefore the concerned license is not needed. < 7. Pollution Control certificacte is taken for Sukadi only not for premix 1. Required Machineries are not installed as perthe Chartered Engineer 2.Not installed In-house Laboratory 3. Consent letter of Insurance company is not provided- 4. Licence of MPCB is not submitted 2.FDA licence is for THR only and not for premix 3. MPCB licenses are not submitted ' 2.Not installed In-house LaboratoryS. Licence of MPCB for flour mill and not for premix.

7 Aadisakti Swamsahyata Gat, Dhule Matoshri Mahila Bachat Gat Beed Radhakrishna Gat Jalgoan Ekata Mahila Audyogik utpadak Sahakari Sanstha thane Navjivan Mahila Bal vikas Mandal Hingoli Maheswari Gat Beed Bidder has not submi^ted the following documents-: 2.Consent letter from insurance company is not submitted 2.Consent letter from insurance company is not submitted 3. Licence of consent to establish from MPCB is for THR and not for premix. License of Consent to Operate is not submitted. 2.Consent letter from insurance company is not submitted 3. Licence of MPCB for THR is submitted instead of premix 4. Two ISO certificates are not submitted 1. Chartered Engineer s are not submitted. 2. Not installed In-house Laboratory 3. Performance issued by Commissionerate 4. Credit worthiness certificate is not submitted 5. Blue print of plant is not submitted 6. Licences of MPCB are not submitted 1. Chartered Engineer s are not submitted. 2. Audited Balancesheets are not submitted 3. Factory lease agreement is for 18 months only and not for 5 years 4. Licences and s are showing different addresses 5. Licences of MPCB is not submitted 1. Chartered Engineer has issued Ce^^ificates on the basis of quotation and documents submitted by the bidder and not on the basis of plant inspection 2. Machinery Performance certificate is not submitted 3.Not installed In-house Laboratory. Only quotation is submitted 4.Consent letter from insurance company is not submitted. 5. Blue Print of the production unit by FDA or CE is not provided 6. Licences of Consent to operate issued by MPCB is'not provided. Instead, only receipt of application is submitted Sukeshini Mahila Om Mahila Kolhapur 1. Chartered Engineer has issued s on the basis of quotation and documents submitted by the bidder and not on the basis of plant inspection 2. Bidder has requested one month period for plant installation 3.Not installed In-house Laboratory. Only quotation is submitted 4.Performance certificate issued by Commissionerate is not submitted 2.In-house Laboratory is not installed and only quotation is submitted 3.Consent letter from insurance company is not submitted

8 49 Amrit Swayam Sahyata Mahila Bachat Gat Dhule 2.Licence of MPCB is for THR and rot for Premix. The bidder has applied to MPCB for including premix in the license 50 Vishakha Mahila Bachqat Gat, 2. In House Laboratory is not installed and Technical Manpower is not engaged 3. Addresses of Unit mentioned on the ISO and FDA License are different Date: Place: Navi Mumba Commissioner, Integrated Child Development Services Scheme Maharashtra State, Navi Mumbai