ANNUAL REPORT OF Escritos de Psicología Psychological Writings

Transcription

1 ANNUAL REPORT OF (Year 2017) 1. Issues published: 3 January-April 2017 May-August 2017 September-December Number of articles: 17 Original research: 10 Review article: 1 Clinical case: 1 Theoretical article: 3 Methodology and instrumentation: 2 3. Authors affiliations: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina Universidad de Málaga, España Universidad de Salamanca, España Universidad de Granada, España Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, España Universitàt de Valencia, España University of Bern, Suiza Universidad de Alicante, España Servicio Andaluz de Salud, España Universidad de La Laguna, España Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Sede Regional de Rosario, República Argentina University of Minho, Portugal Universidad de Murcia, España Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)/RS-Brasil Fundação Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, (UFCSPA)/RS-Brasil Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España 1

2 4. Referees and affiliations: Alberto Acosta, Universidad de Granada, España Alberto Rodríguez Morejón, Universidad de Málaga, España Ángela Muñoz, Universidad de Málaga, España Arantxa Gorostiaga Manterola, Universidad del País Vasco, España Enrique García Fernández-Abascal, UNED, España Esteban Agullo Tomás, Universidad de Oviedo, España Francisco Fernández-Baena, Universidad de Málaga, España Jesús Más Vilata, Universitàt de Valencia, España Maite Barrios, Universitat de Barcelona, España Manuel Marti Vilar, Universidad de Valencia, España María Jesús Fuentes Rebollo, Universidad de Málaga, España María José Blanca, Universidad de Málaga, España Pablo Fernández Berrocal, Universidad de Málaga, España Rafael Alarcón, Universidad de Málaga, España Raquel Gómez Leal, Universidad de Málaga, España Roser Bono, Universitat de Barcelona, España Xavier Méndez Carrillo, Universidad de Murcia, Eapaña 5. Average time between receipt of manuscript and final acceptance: 250 days (approx. 8 months). 6. Average time between acceptance and publication: 110 days (approx. 3,9 months). 7. Papers received: Papers rejected: 5, (35,7%) 9. Papers accepted: 9, (64,3%) With minor changes: 5 With major changes: Authors evaluation: In May 2018, the questionnaire presented in Annex 1 was sent to the authors of the issues corresponding to 2017 to evaluate their satisfaction with the referee and publication process. 8 questionnaires have been received from the 17 envoys. Annex 2 presents the results obtained and in Annex 3 the comments and suggestions received. The results show a high degree of satisfaction with higher average scores in all items to 7.5 points (which refers to the time between acknowledgement of receipt and receipt of the reviewers comments). The journal has obtained an overall average score of 8.63 points. 2

3 11. Improvements made during the report period: o Incoroporation to the catalogue of journals of the University of Malaga, which will occur in a way complete through

4 ANNEX 1 EVALUATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WRITINGS AUTHORS QUESTIONNAIRE Dear author, Please take a moment to complete this short questionnaire to tell us about your experience. Your feedback will be used to improve our journal. The entire questionnaire will take approximately 5 minutes to complete. Please mark (x) the option which best reflects your level of satisfaction with the review and the edition process. Clarity of the instructions for authors Time between submission and acknowledgement of receipt Time between acknowledgement of receipt and receipt of the reviewers comments Clarity of the criteria applied to assess the manuscripts Clarity of the reviewers comments Editors readiness to answer the authors questions Relationships with editors Editorial management Time between final acceptance and publication Website structure Ease to find the website contents Scientific relevance of the published contents Quality of the published scientific contents Compliance with the international editorial standards Edition quality of the journal Diffusion of the journal s contents Totally Satisfied Totally Dissatisfied Overall, how satisfied were you with our journal? x In the future, would you submit a manuscript for publication in again? Unlikely Very likely

5 ANNEX 2 RESULTS OF THE JOURNAL EVALUATION BY THE AUTHORS Items Average Score (Range 1-10) Clarity of the instructions for authors 8,50 Time between submission and acknowledgement of receipt 9,13 Time between acknowledgement of receipt and receipt of the reviewers comments 7,50 Clarity of the criteria applied to assess the manuscripts 8,88 Clarity of the reviewers comments 7,88 Editors readiness to answer the authors questions 8,75 Relationships with editors 9,75 Editorial management 9,00 Time between final acceptance and publication 8,75 Website structure 9,38 Ease to find the website contents 9,13 Scientific relevance of the published contents 8,63 Quality of the published scientific contents 8,50 Compliance with the international editorial standards 9,38 Edition quality of the journal 9,13 Diffusion of the journal s contents 8,25 Overall satisfaction 8,63 Future intention to submit another paper to the journal 8,88 5

6 ANEXO 3 COMENTARIOS Y SUGERENCIAS REALIZADOS POR LOS AUTORES 6