public Total 52 20/30/2 Y10/N2/YN3

Transcription

1 RESULTS FROM QUESTIONNAIRE Daniela Benediková

2 Background Questionnaire contain 9 sectors: National organization of Prunus genetic resources Status and composition of the Prunus collection in country Evaluation / characterization Use of genetic resources Contribution to EPDB (European Prunus Database) Priorities for coming years Gene bank management Safety-duplication Documentation

3 1 National organization of Prunus genetic resources -Deputies of member s countries, to identify all the institutes, where are in your country and have the responsibility for the preservation of Prunus collections -To indicate if the collections are included in a National Programme for PGR if existing at the country or not -To identify if the activities are coordinated and financially supported by public funding - To indicate if the accessions conserved could be integrated in a European Prunus collection

4 Table 1: National organization of Prunus genetic resources Numb er Country Number of institutions Status public Privat/ Part of National program Y/N Part of European collection Y/N 1. Austria 3 2/1 Y/N Y 2. Czech 3. Danemark 1 0/1 Y Y 4. Hungary 1 P Y Y 5. Finland 1 0/1 Y N 6. France 11 2/7/2NGO Y/N Y/N 7. Italy 7 4/3 Y/N N 8. Latvia 1 1/0 Y - 9. Norway 7 1/6 Y N 10. Poland 11. Romania 4 4/0 N Y 12. Rep. Serbia,Bosna and Hercegovina 2 2 N N 13. Slovakia 4 2/2 Y Y/N 14. Slovenia 1 0/P Y Y 15. Sweeden 1 1/0 Y Y 16. Switzerland 7 0/7 Y Y 17. Turkey 1 1/0 Y N 18. UK Total 52 20/30/2 Y10/N2/YN3

5 1. Results : - answered 15 countries - 52 European institutions: 20 private, 30 public, 2 NGO - 3 countries do not send information (Pol, CZ, UK) - Some countries only started with Prunus coll. -10 countries have collections totally included in a National Programme - 3 countries have partly collection included - 2 countries (RO, RS Serbia, Bosnia and dh Herzeg. have not included collection into National program.

6 2 Status and composition of the Prunus collections in Country Participants send information regarding: -list the Prunus species - number of total accessions /species in country -quantify number accessions of National origin. i

7 Table 2: Status and composition of the Prunus collection(s) in Country Species Accessions/ National origin AUSTRIA CZECH HUNGARY FINLAND FRANCE ITALY Almond Apricot Cherry (sweet) Cherry (sour) Peach/Nectarine European Plum Japanese Plum Other (specify) TOTAL

8 Species Accessions/ National origin LATVIA NORWAY POLAND ROMANIA RS/BH SLOVAK Almond Apricot Cherry (sweet) Cherry (sour) Peach/Nectarine European Plum Japanese Plum Other (specify) TOTAL

9 Species Accessions/ National origin SLOVEN SWEDEN SWITZER TURKEY DENMARK TOTAL Almond Apricot Cherry (sweet) Cherry (sour) Peach/Nectarine European Plum Japanese Plum Other (specify) TOTAL

10 2. Results : Total number of accessions : acc acc. national origin Romania acc. Italy acc. France acc. Turkey acc. Hungary acc. Switzerland acc. Austria 986 acc. Slovakia 627 acc. Norway 149 acc. Latvia 142 acc.... Sweden 45 acc.

11 3. Evaluation /characterization Participants: to indicate the degree of characterization ti (%) of the Prunus collections in your country.

12 Num ber Country Table 3: Evaluation / characterization None (just conservation) only passport data Type of characterization % agronom ical data morpholog ical data biochemical data molecul ar data phytosanitar y status 1. Austria Czech 3. Denmark Hungary Finland France Italy Latvia Norway Poland 11. Romania Rep. Serbia Bosna and Hercegovina Slovakia Slovenia Sweden Switzerland Turkey

13 3. Results: After indication the degree of characterization ti - the best characterisation at the all type of characterization: ti Turkey, Italy, France, Denmark and Hungary -only passport data: Finland, Latvia, Sweden and Rep. Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina

14 4. Use of genetic resources Participants evaluated : -utilization of genetic resources at the breeding -others objectives

15 Nu mb er Country Table 4: Use of genetic resources 1. Ada ptab ility 2. Fruit quality Breeding (objectives) 3. Resistan ce to abiotic stress 4. Resista nce biotic stress Type of use 5. Others Exchange Climat changes monitoring Support use of heritage varieties in local market Fruit exhibitions 1. Austria Czech Denmark v v - 4. Hungary - v - v v - 5. Finland v v France - v v v - v v - v - 7. Italy - v v v - v - v v v 8. Latvia v - v v - 9. Norway v v v v v - v 10. Poland Romania - v v v v v - - v v 12. Rep. Serbia Bosna&Her Slovakia v v v v Slovenia v v v v Sweden v v 16. Switzerland v v v v v 17. Turkey v v v v v - v v v v Other uses

16 4. Results: - reflect situation at the breeding of species - other utilisation of fruits for local market, fruit exhibition or others utilisation

17 5 Contribution to EPDB (European Prunus Database) enrichment Participants to indicate how many accessions from your country are already included in the EPDB, if not, which problems are preventing you from doing it.

18 Table 5: Contribution to European Prunus Database AT C Z D HU F FR IT L N RO RS SV S S S E I T O BH K L W W N O T E Almond Apricot Cherry (sweet) Cherry (sour) 0 0 Peach/Nectarine European Plum Japanese Plum Other (specify) Total T K U K

19 Results: Were obtained result only from 5 countries where have included accessions into EPDB. Ido not know, hove to put it, but I thinks, that countries they have not good connection on the EPDB or be afraid this databases. At the discussion we can discussed about it.

20 6 Priorities for coming gy years What are the main priorities within Prunus for the coming years, which species and which activities.

21 Table 6: Priorities for coming years Priority Rank (0 3) Species AL AP CH CH PN EP JP OT S Collection Characterization Breeding Valorizing g( (Initiatives to increase the use of genetic resources or awareness of their importance) Other Rank:0=no priority 1=low priority; 2=medium priority; 3=high priority

22 Results from Questionnaire: Rank of priorities was in dependence on the utilization and importance of Prunus species at the country. 0-3 points

23 7. Gene bank management Deputies of countries: give at this section short description of the criteria followed for conservation of Prunus accessions, In vivo (protocol: trees/accession,... ) In vitro (protocols; regeneration frequency,)

24 7. Gene bank management Results: - All countries have in vivo Prunus collections trees graftedonthespecific rootstocks - Trees are visually and regularly checked for the most important diseases (PPV, fireblight, Monilia, Gnomonia ) In vitro conservation Italy Cryo conservation Italy and Finland, France CRYOVEG project,

25 At France the National collection is managed in two ways: along-term bank, used as the active gene bank for the distribution of material, and a safety bank holding the duplicates. For safety and sanitary reasons France 1-2 tree/accession maintained under an insect-proof greenhouse. The trees planted in adense orchard, 1or 2 trees are maintained. i According to the Prunus charter, the trees are regenerated as clones every 10 to 15 years.

26 Table 7: Gene bank management, safety-duplication and documentation No. Country Only in vivo collection in vitro Y/N Cryo Y/N/Tested Safety dupli cation Y/N Documen tation on line Y/N 1. Austria y n n y y 2. Czech Denmark y n n y y 4. Hungary y n N y n - 5. Finland y n T y y 6. France y n y y y 7. Italy y y y y y/n 8. Latvia y n n y y 9. Norway y n n y y Poland 11. Romania y n n y y 12. Rep. Serbia,Bosna and Hercegovina y n n n n 13. Slovakia y n n y y Slovenia y n n n n 15. Sweden y n n y n 16. Switzerland y n n y y Turkey y n n y y 18. UK www

27 8 Safety- duplication -Is safety duplication arranged, if yes for what % of collections and if location is the same or not; If not arranged: what are the problems?

28 8 Safety- duplication Results: All countries besides (R. Serbia Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slovenia) Different level of duplicates 0% Rep. Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slovenia 30 % Italy, Slovakia %Romania, Turkey, Latvia Save duplication maintained by another member of the National program other location of conservation sites (Slovakia) different regions of country (France)

29 The main problems of Prunus accessions: healthy status of Prunus: PPV, eradication lack of money for plant and staff not funding of activities from national budget or degreasing of budget very old field regeneration collections, need urgent missing money on the identification, collection, introduction, evaluation and regeneration

30 9. Documentation To indicate the documentation status of the accessions conserved in your country:

31 9. Documentation Results: Participants Prunus WG indicated the status of documentation and the web sites

32 Figure 1: Repartition of accessions of the National collection among all members of the National network

33

34

35

36