PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION PACKAGE

Transcription

1 PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION PACKAGE PUBLIC HEARING DATE September 17, 2018 ADDRESSes: Tunbridge Avenue and Unger Court APPLICANT: D. Bowins PLANNING FILE: OCP & R This Public Hearing Information Package has been compiled to provide information pertaining to the subject property. If you have questions regarding this information, please contact the District of Mission s Planning Department at (604) File: P

2 PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION PACKAGE TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S 1. District of Mission Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw (4) and District of Mission Zone Amending Bylaw (315) 2. Planning Department Staff Report dated April 16, 2018 and Planning Department Staff Report dated September 4, 2018 Page 1 Page 3 Page 5 Page Engineering Department Comments dated May 24, 2018 Page 27 File: P

3 DISTRICT OF MISSION BYLAW (4) A Bylaw to amend "District of Mission Official Community Plan Bylaw " WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Local Government Act, a Council may, by bylaw, adopt one or more community plans for one or more areas; AND WHEREAS the Council of the District of Mission has adopted "District of Mission Official Community Plan Bylaw " and amended same from time to time; AND WHEREAS the Council deems it desirable and in the public interest to further amend the Official Community Plan Bylaw; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the District of Mission, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "District of Mission Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw (4). 2. "District of Mission Official Community Plan Bylaw " as amended, is hereby further amended by: a) redesignating a portion of the property located at Tunbridge Avenue and legally described as: Parcel Identifier: Legal Description: Lot 19, Section 32, Township 17, New Westminster District Plan identified as Area A on Schedule 1 attached to and forming part of this Bylaw, from Urban Residential to Urban Compact; and b) amending the official community plan maps accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME this 16 th day of April, 2018 COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF SECTION 477 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT given this 4th day of September, 2018 READ A SECOND TIME this 4th day of September, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING held this day of, 2018 READ A THIRD TIME this day of, 2018 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of, 2018 ADOPTED this day of, 2018 RANDY HAWES MAYOR MIKE YOUNIE CORPORATE OFFICER Information Package - Page 1

4 SCHEDULE 1 District of Mission Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw (4) Page 2 of 2 Information Package - Page 2

5 DISTRICT OF MISSION BYLAW (315) A Bylaw to amend "District of Mission Zoning Bylaw " WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Local Government Act, a Council may, by bylaw, divide the municipality into zones and regulate the use of land, buildings and structures within such zones; AND WHEREAS the Council of the District of Mission has adopted "District of Mission Zoning Bylaw " and amended same from time to time; AND WHEREAS the Council of the District of Mission deems it advisable and in the public interest to amend the Zoning Bylaw; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the District of Mission, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as "District of Mission Zoning Amending Bylaw (315). 2. "District of Mission Zoning Bylaw " as amended, is hereby further amended by: a) Rezoning the following properties: Tunbridge Avenue Parcel Identifier: Lot 19, Section 32, Township 17 New Westminster District Plan Unger Court Parcel Identifier: Lot A, District Lot 32, Township 17, New Westminster District Plan EPP69447 from Suburban 36 (S36) Zone to Residential Compact 372 (RC372) Zone and Urban Residential 465 (R465) Zone, as shown on Schedule 1 attached to and forming part of this Bylaw; and b) amending the zoning maps accordingly. READ A FIRST TIME this 4th day of September, 2018 READ A SECOND TIME this 4th day of September, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING held this day of, 2018 READ A THIRD TIME this day of, 2018 APPROVED by the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure this day of, 2018 ADOPTED this day of, 2018 RANDY HAWES MAYOR MIKE YOUNIE CORPORATE OFFICER Information Package - Page 3

6 SCHEDULE 1 Information Package - Page 4

7 Development Services Staff Report to Council File Category: P R17-022, DP17-021, DV DATE: April 16, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ATTACHMENTS: CIVIC ADDRESS: APPLICANT: Mayor and Council Marcy Bond, Senior Planner Official Community Plan Amendment (OCP17-006) for the property located at Tunbridge Avenue Appendix 1 Information for Corporate Officer Appendix 2 Location Map Appendix 3 Proposed OCP Amendment Appendix 4 Properties Under Development Application Appendix 5 Current OCP Amendment Appendix 6 - Official Community Plan Referral Policy Tunbridge Avenue Don Bowins OCP: This application is not in conformance with the current Urban Residential OCP designation. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE: March 6, 2018 LOCATION: Cedar Valley STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL Information Package - Page 5 Page 1 of 10

8 OVERVIEW AND STAFF COMMENTS RECOMMENDATION: Council consider and resolve: That upon due consideration of Section 475 of the Local Government Act, consultations go forward in accordance with Official Community Plan Referral Policy LAN. 47, that the persons, organizations and authorities receiving those consultations referrals are considered to be those affected for the purposes of this Section. Staff support the application moving forward and as such have listed the Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw under the Bylaws for Consideration section of the agenda. SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to seek Council s resolution to initiate referrals to outside agencies with respect to the OCP Amending Bylaw for the portion of the property at Tunbridge Avenue as shown on Appendix 2. The OCP Amendment proposal is to amend a portion of the lands from Urban Residential to Urban Compact as shown on Appendix 3. The development application includes two properties Tunbridge Avenue and Unger Court (Appendix 4). The development proposal is to amend the Official Community Plan (OCP) designation and rezone the properties to allow for up two (2) urban compact lots and up to nine (9) urban lots. Further details of the development proposal will be submitted for consideration to Council in a subsequent staff report which will include consideration with respect to compliance with the Financial Plan and Solid Waste Management Plan. OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT (Bylaw ) The subject property is currently designated Urban Residential (Appendix 5) in the Official Community Plan. The application seeks to amend a portion of the OCP designation from Urban Residential to Urban Compact designation. The applicant s rationale for amending the OCP is that due to the 25.5 metre width of the parent parcel, after road dedication there will not be enough land to create two (2) urban sized lots fronting Tunbridge Avenue and the proposed OCP amendment would allow for a better utilization of the available land. As the proposed amendment will allow for a better streetscape, increased density and mirroring the development both across the street and on the adjacent lots to the west, staff is supportive of the requested OCP amendment for Area A, as shown on Appendix 4, totalling 784 sq. metres (8438 sq. ft.) from the Urban Residential designation to the Urban Compact designation. The proposed amendment will allow for two urban compact lots fronting Tunbridge Avenue with a minimum lot size of 372 sq. metres (4004 sq. ft.) each. Policy LAN.47 - Official Community Plan (OCP) Referral Review of the proposed development application must be undertaken in compliance with LAN. 47, attached as Appendix 6. Staff have reviewed the requirements of LAN. 47 and recommend that referrals with respect to the OCP amendment be forwarded to School District 75. STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL Information Package - Page 6 Page 2 of 10

9 SIGN-OFFS: Marcy Bond, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Manager of Planning Comment from Chief Administrative Officer Reviewed. STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL Information Package - Page 7 Page 3 of 10

10 Appendix 1 Information for Corporate Officer Civic Address: Tunbridge Avenue PID: Legal: Lot 19, Section 32, Township 17new Westminster District Plan STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL Information Package - Page 8 Page 4 of 10

11 Appendix 2 Location Map STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL Information Package - Page 9 Page 5 of 10

12 Appendix 3 Proposed OCP Amendment STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL Information Package - Page 10 Page 6 of 10

13 Appendix 4 Properties Under Development Application STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL Information Package - Page 11 Page 7 of 10

14 Appendix 5 Existing OCP Designations STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL Information Package - Page 12 Page 8 of 10

15 Appendix 6 Official Community Plan Referral Policy STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL Information Package - Page 13 Page 9 of 10

16 STAFF REPORT TO COUNCIL Page 10 of 10 Information Package - Page 14

17 Development Services Staff Report to Council File Category: P , OCP17-006, R17-022, S17-011, DP17-021, DV DATE: September 4, 2018 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ATTACHMENTS: Mayor and Council Hardeep Atwal, Planner Official Community Plan Amendment (OCP17-006), Rezoning (R17-022) and Development Variance (DV17-023) applications to subdivide the properties located at Tunbridge Avenue and Unger Court Appendix 1 Information for Corporate Officer Appendix 2 Location Map Appendix 3 Proposed Lot Layout Appendix 4 OCP Map Amendment Appendix 5 Zoning Bylaw Amendment Appendix 6 Engineering Department Comments Appendix 7 DRAFT Development Variance Permit DV CIVIC ADDRESS: APPLICANT: OCP: Tunbridge Avenue and Unger Court Don Bowins Urban Residential DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE: March 6, 2018 LOCATION: Cedar Valley Information Package - Page 15

18 OVERVIEW AND STAFF COMMENTS This report details the proposal to subdivide the properties located at Tunbridge Avenue and Unger Court to create up to eleven (11) single family lots and identifies the necessary amendments to the Official Community Plan (OCP) and Zoning Bylaw. Staff support the proposal moving forward and as such have listed OCP Amending Bylaw (4), Zoning Amending Bylaw (315), and Street Naming Bylaw under the Bylaws for Consideration sections of the council agenda, respectively. Subject to Council s approval, a public hearing will be scheduled for September 17, DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL OVERVIEW A development application has been received for the properties located at Tunbridge Avenue and Unger Court (Appendix 2). The application seeks to amend a portion of one of the property s (32643 Tunbridge Avenue) OCP land use designation from Urban Residential to Urban Compact Residential where the remaining lands will maintain their current designation of Urban Residential (refer to Appendix 4). Under these proposed designations, the applicant also seeks to rezone the site from its historical zoning of Suburban 36 (S36) Zone to Residential Compact 372 (RC372) and Urban Residential 465 (R465). Approval of the OCP and zoning amending bylaws will allow the development of site into two (2) urban compact residential lots and nine (9) urban residential lots. The conceptual plan of subdivision showing a total of eleven (11) single family residential lots is provided as reference in Appendix 3. To allow the site to be subdivided as proposed, variances to the Zoning Bylaw are also needed. The variances to the Zoning Bylaw would allow proposed Lots 5, 8 and 11 to be created with marginally deficient lot dimensions. A variance to the Subdivision and Development Control Bylaw was granted during the P development application file allowing the road to be narrowed and that road standard will be carried through as part of the current development application. The variances are detailed in the following tables: Table 1 Zoning Bylaw Variances to lots 5 and 8 Lot Lot Depth Variance Request Setback Variance Request 5 Reduce lot depth from 25.0 m (82.0 ft.) to 18.0 m (59.2 ft.) Reduce front yard setback along cul-de-sac curve from 6.0 m (19.6 ft.) to 3.0 m (9.8 ft.) Reduce rear yard setback from 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) to 5.0 m (16.4 ft.) Increase north interior side yard setback from 1.5 m (4.9 ft.) to 6.0 m (19.6 ft.) 8 Reduce lot depth from 25.0 m (82.0 ft.) to 18.0 m (59.2 ft.) Reduce front yard setback along cul-de-sac curve from 6.0 m (19.6 ft.) to 3.0 m. (9.8 ft.) Reduce rear yard setback from 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) to 5.0 m (16.4 ft.) Increase north interior side yard setback from 1.5 m (4.9 ft.) to 6.0 m (19.6 ft.) Information Package - Page 16

19 Table 2 Zoning Bylaw Variances to lot 11 Lot Lot Width Variance Request Setback Variance Requests 11 Reduce lot width from 16.0 m (52.4 ft.) to 12.0 m (39.3 ft.) at the 6.0 (19.7 ft.) setback as per the general regulations for lots of irregular shape (section 104(B)(2)(b)). Reduce rear yard setback from 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) to 6.02 m (19.7 ft.) SITE CHARACTERISTICS The site totals approximately 0.77 ha (1.90 ac) and is located on the north side of Tunbridge Avenue, west of the intersection at Cedar Street. The existing single-family dwelling on the eastern parent lot will be removed as part of the development application. There is an existing single-family dwelling on the western parent lot that will be retained on proposed Lot 11. As part of the subdivision, this dwelling will re-orientate its access towards Unger Court. There is a watercourse at the mid-western portion of the site, which has been identified as environmentally significant and protected with the registration of a restrictive covenant as part of a previous development application. No further work is required in relation to this watercourse as part of this development application. OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT The application seeks to amend a portion of the eastern parent lot s (32643 Tunbridge Avenue) OCP designation from Urban Residential to Urban Compact. The rationale provided for the amendment is that it would allow zoning and densities that would maintain a consistent development pattern of compact lots along Tunbridge Avenue. The area of the site subject to the OCP amendment from the Urban Residential designation to the Urban Compact designation is shown as Area A on Appendix 4 which will allow for the creation of proposed Lots 6 and 7 as shown on the proposed lot layout (Appendix 3). ZONING BYLAW COMPLIANCE The development application is seeking two amendments to the Zoning Bylaw. The first is to rezone a portion of land from S36 Zone to the RC372 Zone, shown as Area B on Appendix 5, to create two RC372 lots (i.e., Lots 6 and 7) fronting Tunbridge Avenue. The second zoning amendment is to rezone the remainder of the site from S36 Zone to R465 Zone, shown as Area C on Appendix 5, for nine lots. Due to the lot configuration and their irregular shapes, the applicant is requesting variances to ensure that each lot is able to achieve a practical building envelope and usable yard space. Staff have worked with the applicant to ensure that the variances being requested will result in better building envelopes and usable yards on each lot. Information Package - Page 17

20 LOT / BUILDING VARIANCES To achieve specific residential siting objectives for proposed lots 5 and 8, under the R465 Type II Zone, the applicant proposes to vary four provisions of the Zoning Bylaw: Section 501 (C) (1) (Lot Depth) by: o Reducing the lot Depth from 25.0 m (82.02 ft.) to 18.0 m (59.05 ft.); and Section 501 (D) (1) (Front Yard Setback) by: o Reducing the portion of the Front Yard Setback along the cul-de-sac bulb from 6.0 m (19.7 ft.) to 3.0 m (9.84 ft.); and Section 501 (D) (1) (Rear Yard Setback) by: o Reducing the Rear Yard Setback from 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) to 5.0 m (16.4 ft.); and Section 501 (D) (1) (Interior Side Yard Setback) by: o Increase the north Interior Side Yard Setback from 1.5 m (4.9 ft.) to 6.0 m (19.7 ft.). To achieve specific residential siting objectives due to the location of an existing residential dwelling for the proposed lot 11, under the R465 Type I Zone, the applicant proposes to vary two items of the Zoning Bylaw by varying: Section 104 (B) (2) (b) by: o Reducing the Lot Width from 16.0 m (52.49 ft.) to 12.0 m (39.3 ft.) at the 6.0 m (19.7 ft.) setback ; and Section 501 (D) (1) (Rear Yard Setback) by: o Reducing the Rear Yard Setback from 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) to 6.0 m (19.7 ft.). While the variances requested would not normally be supported by staff in a greenfield type development, this subdivision is considered as infill development on a site that has been constrained by previous development approvals. The variances being requested are not only to ensure densities are maximized while maintaining neighbourhood development patterns as established by pervious developments, they are also considered necessary to ensure good building envelopes and usable yard space for each lot. As a concession to allowing irregular shaped lots, building setbacks on lots 4 and 9 will be increased by way of restrictive covenant to ensure better sitting of abutting future homes. PLANNING ANALYSIS Neighbourhood Character Residential development consisting of a mix of Urban Compact and Urban Residential lots is consistent with the overall development pattern that has been occurring in Cedar Valley in recent years. Specifically, there has been redevelopment surrounding the subject properties with the creation of compact residential lots along Tunbridge Avenue and more standard type residential lots to the north across Unger Court. In this context, the proposed development is considered in keeping with the changing character of the overall neighbourhood area. Access and Servicing Proposed Lots 1, 2 and 11 will be accessed from Unger Court. Proposed lots 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, and 10 will be accessed off of the proposed cul-de-sac where lots 6 and 7 will be accessed from Tunbridge Avenue. All proposed lots will have full municipal services. Information Package - Page 18

21 Environmental Protection There is one watercourse on the site that has been identified and protected as part of a previous development application (development application filep ). No additional protection or works are required as part of this development application. Tree Retention In accordance with Council Policy LAN. 32 Tree Retention and Replanting, the applicant will be required to plant a total of twenty-two (22) trees; two trees for each of the eleven lots proposed. This condition will need to be met as part of the subdivision approval process. In addition, the applicant is also required to replace any significant tree (trees having a caliper of 0.2 metres or greater at the height of 1.5 metres above ground level) that will be removed except within the proposed municipal infrastructure necessary to complete the development. Parks and Trails As per Section 510 of the Local Government Act, and the Parks and Trails Master Plan, the developer is to provide five percent (5%) cash-in-lieu for neighbourhood parkland. This requirement will need to be met as part of the subdivision approval process. STREET NAMING In accordance with Section 39 of the Community Charter and Council Policy Street Naming STR.28, a bylaw will be prepared to name the new section of road created with this development as shown on Appendix 3. Specifically, the sirname recommended for the new road extending north off Tunbridge Avenue is Jamieson Terrace in honour of Herbert and Evelyn Jamieson, long-time residents and pioneer family of Mission. The following information was available on the Jamieson family: Herbert Jamieson was born in 1888 and died in Herbert s wife Evelyn was born in 1896 and died in Both resided in the in Silverdale area of Mission; Served overseas with the 143rd Battalion; and Herbert was also a member of the Royal Canadian Legion. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Intensive Residential Development Permit DP An Intensive Residential Development Permit is required for lands designated for Urban Compact residential development. The OCP establishes guidelines for the form and character of intensive residential development by requiring a higher standard of building design, housing alternative, site compatibility and site aesthetics that promote the important quality of a vibrant residential neighbourhood. The applicant is required to register a restrictive covenant on proposed Lots 6 and 7 as part of the subdivision process to ensure that the residential buildings meet the Intensive Residential Development Permit Guidelines as outlined in the OCP. It is noted that approval of Intensive Residential Development Permits is delegated to the Director of Development Services. COMMUNITY AMENITY CONTRIBUTION In accordance with Council Policy LAN.40, the applicant has volunteered to contribute a total of $25, based on the creation of 9 new lots ($2,815 per new lot or unit). The monies contributed help to offset the unique financial burden that new residential development incurs on the District to fund new facilities and/or amenities. Information Package - Page 19

22 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Section 477 of the Local Government Act requires that Council consider amendments to the OCP Bylaw in conjunction with the District s Financial Plan, which includes the Capital Expenditure Plan, Operating Expenditure Plan and the Waste Management Plan. The basis for this consideration is that incremental OCP amendments can have a cumulative impact on the District s financial plans and need to be reviewed prior to Council s second reading to the amending bylaw. The rationale being that when growth reaches a certain point, new facilities and staffing resources are needed. The need for additional resources brought on by the cumulative impact of growth is addressed through the District s annual planning processes and departmental spending package requests. It is concluded that the amendment to the OCP that would allow the creation of two compact lots fronting Tunbridge Avenue, (rather than one lot) is not expected to have an adverse impact on the District s Financial Plan. COMMUNICATION The applicant has posted two development notification signs on the site summarizing the proposed development. Provided a public hearing date is determined by Council, the sign will be modified to advertise the public hearing details (i.e., date, time and place). In addition, a notice will be mailed to the owners and to the occupiers of all properties within a distance of 152 metres (500 ft.) of the development site notifying them of the public hearing details. Policy LAN.50 - Pre-Public hearing Information Packages A pre-public hearing information package will be prepared to include copies of all applicable documents and will be made available online or at municipal hall for public viewing. Bylaw Land Use Application Procedures and Fees A notice of Public Hearing will be prepared in accordance with Bylaw and the Local Government Act. A notice of the Development Variance Permit shall be mailed or otherwise delivered in accordance with Bylaw and the Local Government Act. Policy LAN.47 - Official Community Plan (OCP) Referral As this application is to amend the Official Community Plan for two compact lots fronting Tunbridge Avenue, from the Urban designation to the Compact designation, the only referral required according to Official Community Plan Referral LAN. 7 Policy is to the School District 75. REFERRALS Engineering The Engineering Department has no objection to the project subject to the completion of engineering servicing requirements as outlined in Appendix 7. CONDITIONS TO FINAL READING The Final Reading to the amending bylaws will be held until the following have been satisfied: 1. Any requirements received from external agencies regarding the proposed OCP amendment; 2. The community amenity contribution that has been volunteered in the amount of $25, ($2,815 per new lot) is received; Information Package - Page 20

23 3. A section 219 restrictive covenant is drafted with a letter of undertaking stating that the covenant will be registered on proposed Lots 5 and 8 as part of the subdivision, to address form and character, siting and access location. 4. A section 219 restrictive covenant is prepared with a letter of undertaking stating that the covenant will be registered on title of proposed Lots 4 and 9 as part of the subdivision to better define the lot and building setbacks; and 5. Any other requirements resulting from Council s consideration of the Bylaws including the Public Hearing proceedings. INFORMATIONAL NOTES Approval of Development Variance Permit DV will be considered as part of the same Council agenda as the Official Community Plan and Zone Amending Bylaws are considered. SIGN-OFFS: Hardeep Atwal, Planner Reviewed by: Director of Development Services Comment from Chief Administrative Officer Reviewed Information Package - Page 21

24 Appendix 1 Information for Corporate Officer Civic Address: Tunbridge Avenue PID: Legal: Lot 19, Section 32, Township 17 New Westminster District Plan61463 Civic Address: Unger Court PID: Legal: Lot A, District Lot 32, Township 17, New Westminster District Plan EPP69447 Information Package - Page 22

25 Appendix 2: Location Map Information Package - Page 23

26 Appendix 3: Proposed Lot Layout Information Package - Page 24

27 Appendix 4: OCP Map Amendment Information Package - Page 25

28 Appendix 5: Zoning Bylaw Amendment Information Package - Page 26

29 Appendix 6: Engineering Department Comments Information Package - Page 27

30 Appendix 7: DRAFT DV DISTRICT OF MISSION DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT DV Issued pursuant to Section 498 of the Local Government Act Issued to: Preet Dhillon, Sandpiper Drive, Abbotsford, BC V2T 5N3 Pawandeep Jhahh, Vye Road, Abbotsford, BC V2S 7P7 as the registered owner (hereinafter referred to as the Permittee) and shall only apply to ALL AND SINGULAR that certain parcel or tract of land and premises situate, lying and being in the Municipality of Mission, in the Province of British Columbia, and more particularly known and described as: Parcel Identifier: Lot 19 Section 32 Township 17 New Westminster District Plan Parcel Identifier: Lot A Section 32 Township 17 New Westminster District Plan EPP The said lands are zoned Urban Residential and Urban Compact pursuant to District of Mission Zoning Bylaw as amended. 2. District of Mission Zoning Bylaw as amended is hereby varied in respect of the said lands as follows: (a) Section 501 (C) (1) (Lot Depth) by reducing the lot depth of lot 5 and lot 8 from 25.0 m (82.02 ft.) to 18.0 m (59.05 ft.); and (b) Section 501 (D) (1) (Front Yard Setback) by reducing the portion of the front yard setback along the cul-de-sac bulb of lot 5 and lot 8 from 6.0 m (19.7 ft.) to 3.0 m (9384 ft.); and (c) Section 501 (D) (1) (Rear Yard Setback) by reducing the rear yard setback for lot 5 and lot 8 from 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) to 5.0 m (16.4 ft.); and (d) Section 501 (D) (1) (Interior Side Yard Setback) by increasing the north interior side yard setback for lot 5 and lot 8 from 1.5 m (4.9 ft.) to 6.0 m (19.7 ft.); and (e) Section 104 (B) (2) (b) by reducing the lot width of lot 11 from 16.0 m (52.49 ft.) to 12.0 m (39.3 ft.) at the 6.0 m (19.7 ft.) setback; and (f) Section 501 (D) (1) (Rear Yard Setback) by reducing the rear yard setback for lot 11 from 7.5 m (24.6 ft.) to 6.0 m (19.7 ft.). 3. This Permit does not constitute a subdivision approval or a building permit. AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION NO. [Click here to type resolution number] passed by the Council on the [Click here to type day of the month] day of [Click here to type month], [Click here to type year]. IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Development Variance Permit is hereby issued by the Municipality signed by the Mayor and the Corporate Officer the [Click here to type day of the month] day of [Click here to type month], [Click here to type year]. Randy Hawes, MAYOR Michael Younie, CORPORATE OFFICER Development Variance Permit DV Information Package - Page 28