BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Transcription

1 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) For Approval Of The Results Of Its Second Preferred Resources Pilot Request For Offers. Application (Filed November 4, 2016) RESPONSE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE RULING JANET S. COMBS REBECCA MEIERS-DE PASTINO Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California Telephone: (626) Facsimile: (626) Dated: August 11, 2017

2 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) For Approval Of The Results Of Its Second Preferred Resources Pilot Request For Offers. Application (Filed November 4, 2016) RESPONSE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE RULING In compliance with Administrative Law Judge Miles' August 9, ruling, Southern California Edison Company respectfully files its responses to the Office of Ratepayer Advocates' data request set SCE-008 for Judge Miles' review. SCE's responses are attached hereto as Appendix A. Respectfully submitted, JANET S. COMBS REBECCA MEIERS-DE PASTINO /s/ Rebecca Meiers-De Pastino By: Rebecca Meiers-De Pastino Attorneys for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY August 11, Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California Telephone: (626) Facsimile: (626)

3 Appendix A Responses to the Office of Ratepayer Advocates' Data Request Set SCE-008

4 Prepared by: Caroline McAndrews Title: Director, Preferred Resources Pilot Question 01: 1. Provide a definition of de minimis as used by SCE in this context. Response to Question 01: The term "de mimimis" that was used in this statement: "The incremental cost of the PRP RFO 2 procurement, approximately $0.20/month per average residential customer on a diminishing scale for 20 years, is a de minimis financial investment in attempting to secure a more certain future that will be increasingly dependent upon DERs." was meant to mean minor or minimal. To provide context, the LCR contracts targeting the PRP region and deployment in 2017 (see question 8 response) have a similar rate impact but do not deliver as many MW as the PRP RFO 2 contracts. The rate impact of 0.2%/month is not so minor as to imply it should be ignored, but rather in the full context of the sentence, meant to state that this minor impact is valuable to provide more information about DER performance and to advance CA's objectives of a cleaner grid.

5 Prepared by: Gene Lee Title: Contract Manager Question 02: 2. Identify the total amount of resources (in megawatts) SCE procured in its 2013 Local Capacity Requirement (LCR) request for offer (RFO) (2013 LCR RFO) in the Western LA Basin (as authorized in Decision ). Response to Question 02: 1, MW (1, MW were submitted in SCE s application seeking approval, however 70 MW were rejected by the CPUC). Please note that the numbers above reflect Contract MW. SCE's LCR testimony referenced LCR MW throughout as that was the need being fulfilled. LCR MW was defined as the August 2021 RA MW.

6 Prepared by: Matt Sheriff Title: Senior Project Manager Question 03: 3. Identify the rate impact associated with contracts (for the contract duration) approved resulting from SCE s 2013 LCR RFO in the Western LA Basin (i.e., $/month per average residential customer). Response to Question 03: Shown below is the maximum impact to the 2017 average residential bill of $107 of the contracts described above.

7 Prepared by: Gene Lee Title: Contract Manager Question 04: 4. Identify the total amount of preferred resources (in megawatts) SCE procured in its 2013 LCR RFO in the Western LA Basin (as authorized in Decision ). Response to Question 04: MW (SCE counts behind the meter storage as both storage and a preferred resource, since the product operates similar to demand response). In Front of the Meter (IFOM) Storage MW is not considered preferred in this context. Please note that the numbers above reflect Contract MW. SCE's LCR testimony referenced LCR MW throughout as that was the need being fulfilled. LCR MW was defined as the August 2021 RA MW.

8 Prepared by: Matt Sheriff Title: Senior Project Manager Question 05: 5. Identify the rate impact associated with preferred resource contracts (for the contract duration) approved resulting from SCE s 2013 LCR RFO in the Western LA Basin (i.e., $/month per average residential customer). Response to Question 05: Shown below is the maximum impact to the 2017 average residential bill of $107 of the contracts described above.

9 Prepared by: Gene Lee Title: Contract Manager Question 06: 6. Identify the total amount of energy storage resources (in megawatts) SCE procured in its 2013 LCR RFO in the Western LA Basin (as authorized in Decision ). Response to Question 06: MW behind the meter, 100 MW in front of the meter, for a total of MW of storage. Please note that the numbers above reflect Contract MW. SCE's LCR testimony referenced LCR MW throughout as that was the need being fulfilled. LCR MW was defined as the August 2021 RA MW.

10 Prepared by: Matt Sheriff Title: Senior Project Manager Question 07: 7. Identify the rate impact associated with energy storage contracts (for the contract duration) approved resulting from SCE s 2013 LCR RFO in the Western LA Basin (i.e., $/month per average residential customer). Response to Question 07: Shown below is the maximum impact to the 2017 average residential bill of $107 of the contracts described above.

11 Prepared by: Matt Sheriff Title: Senior Project Manager Question 08: 8. In SCE s 2013 LCR RFO Prepared Testimony at p. 59, SCE states that, based on a sensitivity analysis, SCE determined that 66 MW of PRP eligible MW was optimal and cost competitive for procurement in through its 2013 LCR RFO in the Johanna/Santiago sub-areas. Identify the rate impact associated with the 66 MW of PRP eligible MW (for the contract duration) SCE procured in its 2013 LCR RFO in the Western LA Basin (i.e., $/month per average residential customer). Response to Question 08: Shown below is the maximum impact to the 2017 average residential bill of $107 of the contracts described above.

12 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) For Approval Of The Results Of Its Second Preferred Resources Pilot Request For Offers. Application (Filed November 4, 2016) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, pursuant to the Commission s Rules of Practice and Procedure, I have this day served a true copy of RESPONSE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY (U 338-E) TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE RULING on all parties identified on the attached service list(s) A Service was effected by one or more means indicated below: Transmitting the copies via to all parties who have provided an address. Placing the copies in sealed envelopes and causing such envelopes to be delivered U.S. Mail to the offices of the Commissioner(s) or other addressee(s). ALJ Patricia Miles California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA Executed this August 11, 2017, at Rosemead, California. /s/ Regina Coburn Regina Coburn Legal Administrative Assistant SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770

13 CPUC - Service Lists - A Page 1 of 3 8/11/2017 CPUC Home CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists PROCEEDING: A EDISON - FOR APPROVA FILER: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: JULY 31, 2017 Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files Back to Service Lists Index Parties REBECCA MEIERS-DE PASTINO MATT MILEY SR. ATTORNEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY LEGAL DIVISION 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE / PO BOX 800 ROOM 5135 ROSEMEAD, CA VAN NESS AVENUE FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SAN FRANCISCO, CA FOR: ORA SEAN P. BEATTY WEST REGION GEN. COUNSEL NRG ENERGY, INC, 100 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA FOR: DISTRIBUTED GENERATION PR LLC Information Only CASE COORDINATION PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ONLY ONLY, CA DIANE I. FELLMAN VP - WEST, GOV'T AFFAIRS NRG ONLY ONLY, CA MRW ASSOCIATES BLAKE ELDER MRW & ASSOCIATES CLEAN ENERGY SPECIALIST ONLY EQ RESEARCH ONLY, CA HARRISON OAKS BLVD., STE. 100

14 CPUC - Service Lists - A Page 2 of 3 8/11/2017 CARY, NC DANIEL DOUGLASS CASE ADMINISTRATION ATTORNEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY DOUGLASS & LIDDELL 8631 RUST STREET 4766 PARK GRANADA, SUITE 209 ROSEMEAD, CA CALABASAS, CA FOR: WESTERN POWER TRADING FORUM SUE MARA WADE A. GREENACRE RTO ADVISORS L.L.C. REGULATORY CASE COORDINATOR 164 SPRINGDALE WAY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY REDWOOD CITY, CA BEALE ST., MC B9A SAN FRANCISCO, CA MATTHEW VESPA DON LIDDELL ATTORNEY CALIFORNIA ENERGY STORAGE ALLIANCE EARTHJUSTICE, CALIF. OFFICE 2150 ALLSTON WAY, STE CALIFORNIA STREET, STE. 500 BERKELEY, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA FOR: SIERRA CLUB ALEX MORRIS JIN NOH DIR - POLICY & REGULATORY AFFAIRS SR. CONSULTANT STRATEGEN CONSULTING STRATEGEN CONSULTING 2150 ALLSTON WAY, STE ALLSTON WAY, STE.210 BERKELEY, CA BERKELEY, CA MIKE CADE INDUSTRY SPECIALIST ALCANTAR & KAHL 121 SW SALMON STREET, SUITE 1100 PORTLAND, OR State Service BRIAN GOLDMAN CATHLEEN A. FOGEL ENERGY SAFETY & INFRASTRUCTURE BRANCH DEMAND RESPONSE, CUSTOMER GENERATION, AN AREA AREA 4-A 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA CHRISTIAN KNIERIM CHRISTOPHER MYERS ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH AREA ROOM VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA DIANA L. LEE LEGAL DIVISION EHREN SEYBERT COMMISSIONER PETERMAN

15 CPUC - Service Lists - A Page 3 of 3 8/11/2017 ROOM 4107 ROOM VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA GABRIEL PETLIN KARIN M. HIETA DEMAND RESPONSE, CUSTOMER GENERATION, AN ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH AREA 4-A ROOM VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA PATRICIA MILES RACHEL MCMAHON DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING AND PERMITTING B ROOM 5044 AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, CA TOP OF PAGE BACK TO INDEX OF SERVICE LISTS