NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Albany City Council that Resolution 6245 is hereby repealed as of the effective date of the revised fees; and

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Albany City Council that Resolution 6245 is hereby repealed as of the effective date of the revised fees; and"

Transcription

1 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION REVISING SEWER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ( SDC) FOR CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM, REAFFIRMING AN APPEAL FEE AND REPEALING RESOLUTION 6245 ( A RESOLUTION REVISING SEWER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES ( SDC) FOR CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM, REAFFIRMING AN APPEAL FEE AND REPEALING RESOLUTION 6130). WHEREAS, through the previous adoption of ordinances establishing and amending Albany Municipal Code regarding system development charges, the Council of the City of Albany has duly declared its intent to comply with Oregon SDC law provisions of ORS through and through ; and WHEREAS, a methodology for the calculation of System Development Charges for the sanitary sewer systems has been developed as specifically described in Resolution 4292; and WHEREAS, Section ( 5) of Ordinance 5306 allows for the annual adjustment of the herein established fees in accordance with the change in the Engineering News - Record ( ENR) Construction Cost Index ( Seattle); and WHEREAS, the Mayor's Wastewater Task Force reviewed the needs of the City's wastewater system and developed a strategic financial plan that included new sewer rate and System Development Charge fee schedules, and the Mayor's Wastewater Task Force Report was accepted by the Albany City Council on January 26, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Albany City Council deems it desirable to increase the existing fees to reflect inflation relative to the increase in the ENR Index; and WHEREAS, the Seattle Engineering News - Record (ENR) index used in Resolution 6245 was 9431, and the April 2014 Seattle ENR Index to be applied for purposes of this Resolution is ( Index Ratio = 10145/ 9431 = ); and WHEREAS, the sewer system development charge methodology ( Resolution 4292) states that adjustments will only be made to the base system development charge and not to the 5 -year average debt service credit; and WHEREAS, the five -year average debt service credit is $ 516 per equivalent dwelling unit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Albany City Council that Resolution 6245 is hereby repealed as of the effective date of the revised fees; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Sewer System Development Charges are hereby amended as described in Exhibit "A;" and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an appeal fee is hereby reaffirmed as described herein; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Sewer System Development Charges herein established become effective July 1, DATED THIS 25TH DAY OF JUNE ATTEST: ` = Mayor city erk 2014 Sewer SDC Resolution

2 EXHIBIT A SANITARYSEWER SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE Residential and Commercial The sanitary sewer system development charge reimbursement ( SDC -R) and improvement ( SDC -I) fees are based on an equivalent dwelling unit ( EDU). An EDU is used to describe the wastewater from a customer with flow characteristics similar to a single - family dwelling ( approximately 75 gallons per An apartment complex person per day and combined BOD and SS concentration of less than 451 mg/l). with 20 living units would be defined as 20 EDUs. Commercial customers tend to vary significantly in terms of wastewater volumes. A plumbing fixture count is used to represent different wastewater volumes from commercial customers. Commercial customers also tend to vary significantly in terms of wastewater strengths. Certain commercial customers e. g., restaurants and dry cleaners) contain pollutant loads that are above domestic strength ( the average strength of residential customers). Customers with medium - strength or high - strength pollutant loads have larger capacity demands per EDU than residential and domestic - strength commercial customers. Consequently, the Mayor's Wastewater Task Force determined that a strength -based fee should be used for commercial customers to recognize these differences. The combined BOD and TSS for the low- strength customer category are similar to the combined BOD and TSS for typical residential customers ( up to 450 mg/l). Examples of commercial customers with low - strength waste include professional offices and general retail businesses. Approximately 680 or roughly 70 percent ( 70 %) of the current commercial customers in Albany fall into the low- strength category. Twenty -two percent ( 22 %) of Albany' s current commercial customers fall into the medium - strength category ( 451 mg/l - 1, 125 mg/l combined BOD and TSS) including mortuaries, car washes, restaurants, hospitals, and dry cleaners. The remaining eight percent of Albany' s current commercial customers fall into the high - strength category ( greater than 1, 126 mg/l) including industrial launderers, breweries, confectioners, chemical or pharmaceutical companies, and grocery stores with garbage disposals. A list of typical customer types in each strength category is included in Appendix 1. The classification of a new commercial customer will be determined by using the Commercial Customer Classification List ( Appendix I). If the commercial customer cannot be easily categorized, they will be asked to submit estimated wastewater flow and strength data with a description of the type of business activities to the Public Works Director. If multiple business types are tributary to a single pipe discharging to the wastewater collection system, the commercial customer classification for each tributary facility will be determined and the classification with the highest strength will become the commercial customer classification for the entire facility. The Public Works Director will make the final determination of customer classification for each new commercial customer. To determine the SDC fee for residential and commercial customers, the fee per unit cost of capacity is multiplied by the average loading for the customer classification. The fee per unit cost of capacity and the average customer capacity requirements or loadings are shown in the following tables: 2014 Sewer System Development Charges Exhibit A - Page 1 of 5

3 FEE PER UNIT OF CAPACITY Dry Weather Flow Wet Weather Flow BOD TSS Units Mgd mgd (a) lbs /day (b) lbs/day ( b)_ SDC -R Unit Costs $ 9 210,707 $ ($23. 54) ($69. 23) 69 SDC -I Unit Costs $ 1, 3r v,995 1, 467, 250 $ 1, 452 1, 999, , 5 1, , 808 TOTAL Unit Costs $ 1, 55x,8741, 677, 957 $ 1, , 999, , , 877 Numbers in parenthesis are calculated numbers and those in bold are the current fee rounded to the nearest dollar. a) Wet weather peak instantaneous flow expressed in million gallons per day b) Maximum month loading expressed in pounds per day CUSTOMER CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS LOADINGS CUSTOMER CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS LOADINGS Dry Weather Flow Wet Weather Flow BOD TSS Customer Classification mgd ( a) mgd ( a) lbs/ day Lbs /day Residential ( per EDU) Commercial -- Low Commercial -- Medium Commercial -- High a) Per six fixtures For For residential residential and and commercial commercial development, development, the the SDC SDC fee fee is is as as follows: follows: SDC SDC - - RR SDC SDC - - II per per EDU EDU Total Total Cost Cost per per Additional Additional Customer Customer Class Class Per Per EDU EDU Base Base Less Less Credit Credit ( ( aa Net Net SDC/ SDC/ EDU EDU Fixture Fixture over over 66 Residential Residential $ $ ($ ($ ) 22) S S - - 0= 0= , 3, S516 S516 $ $ , 2, $ $ 2-, 2-, , 2, Multiple Multiple Dwelling Dwelling ( ( b) b) $ $ ($ ($ ) 22) SS 3, 3, , 3, SS $ $ , 2, $ $ , 2, Commercial Commercial - - Low Low $ $ ($ ($ ) 22) S S - - 3; 3; 0, 0, , 3, SS $ $ , 2, $ $ 2; 2; , 2, $ $ Commercial Commercial - - Medium Medium ( ( c) c) $ ($ ($ ) 83) SS , 4, SS $ $ 3-, 3-, , 4, $ $ 3-, 3-, , 4, $ $ Commercial Commercial - - High High $ $ ($ ($ ) 91) SS 7, 7, , 7, SS 1, 1, $ $ , 6, $ $ 64,- 64,-666, 666, $ $ 4,, 4,, OU OU 1, 1, Numbers Numbers in in parenthesis parenthesis are are calculated calculated numbers numbers and and those those in in bold bold are are the the current current fee fee rounded rounded to to the the nearest nearest dollar. dollar. a) a) See See Appendix Appendix II II for for sample sample customer customer debt debt service service credit credit calculation calculation b) b) For For multifamily multifamily residential residential development, development, the the SDC SDC is is the the current current residential residential SDC SDC per per dwelling dwelling unit. unit. c) c) For For Recreational Recreational Vehicle Vehicle ( ( RV) RV) Parks, Parks, the the SDC SDC is is calculated calculated based based upon upon an an assignment assignment of of three three plumbing plumbing fixtures fixtures per per pad pad or or space. space Sewer Sewer System System Development Development Charges Charges Exhibit Exhibit A A - - Page Page 22 of of 55

4 Industrial Industrial customers' use of the system is highly variable. Once connected to the wastewater system, each industrial customer is required to monitor and report its specific use of the system on a monthly basis. However, to determine the SDC fee for each industrial customer prior to collection of specific data, individualized flows and loads will be estimated and applied to the same unit cost of capacity as is used for the residential and commercial customers. The unit cost of capacities is shown in the following table: FEE PER UNIT OF CAPACITY Dry Weather Flow Wet Weather Flow BOD TSS Units M d m' d a lbs/ da b lbs /da b SDC -R Unit Costs $ 195, , 707 $ ($23. 54) ($69.23) 69 SDC -I Unit Costs $ 1, Z 1, 467, 250 $ 1T vvvvrz 1, 999,330 4, A 1, ,684-1, 808 TOTAL Unit Costs $ 1, 559, 874 1, 677, 957 $ 1, 452 1, 999,330 4-, 1, , 745 1, 877 Numbers in parenthesis are calculated numbers and those in bold are the current fee rounded to the nearest dollar. a) Wet weather peak instantaneous flow expressed in million gallons per day b) Maximum month loading expressed in poun s per day For industrial development, the SDC fee is calculated by multiplying the individual customer's projected flows and loads by the unit costs of capacity shown above. The total SDC is the sum of the individual SDCs by parameter. The dry weather flow SDC for a sample industrial customer with a dry weather flow of 11, 600 gallons per day would be calculated as follows: I( SAMPLE INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER DRY WEATHER FLOW CALCULATION Unit costs ( a) Sample Customer Data SDC -R $ 210, 707 per mgd mgd dry weather flow $ 2, 444 SDC -I $ 1, 467, 250 per mgd mgd dry weather flow $ 17, 020 Debt Credit (b) $ 62 per dry weather EDU dry weather flow EDUs ($ 1, 712) a) Unit costs are based on current ENR Index ( Seattle) b) See Appendix II for sample customer debt service credit calculation Dry Weather Flow SDC for Sample Industrial Customer $ 17, 752 I Industrial customers are required to submit periodic compliance reports ( AMC ( 9)) indicating the nature and concentration of pollutants in the discharge and the average and maximum daily flows for the reporting period. Within twelve months from connection or at a mutually agreed upon time when the industrial customer's wastewater discharge characteristics have stabilized, the SDC may be recalculated based on the actual pollutant loading and flow and an adjusted payment ( or refund) may be required. Each industrial user is required to notify the City of any planned significant changes to the industrial user's operations that might alter the nature, quality, or volume of its wastewater ( AMC ( 16)). If at any time after the initial SDC fee is paid and process or production changes result in increased flows and loads above those used to calculate original sewer SDCs at the time of connection, the industry shall be responsible for payment of additional SDCs based on the unit costs of capacity in effect at the time of the increase. If, however, the process or production change results in decreased flows and loads, the industry will not be eligible for an SDC refund Sewer System Development Charges Exhibit A - Page 3 of5

5 Millersburg Millersburg customers are not charged individual SDCs as they connect. Historically, growth- related costs are recovered from Millersburg through equivalent connection charges established in the service agreement between the two communities. This intergovernmental sanitary sewer service agreement between Albany and Millersburg states that " Albany and Millersburg agree to share in future capital projects based on the degree of benefit each community receives and to enter into good faith negotiations as cost and level of service decisions are made." Millersburg's SDC is based on unit costs for the Wastewater Treatment Plant's existing and future available capacity. Millersburg' s unit costs are less than Albany's because the collection system costs are removed since Millersburg' s wastewater is transported directly to the Albany treatment plant through their own collection system. Albany's unit costs include treatment and collection system costs. Millersburg's SDC fee is calculated by multiplying their projected flows and loads by the Millersburg unit costs of treatment capacity shown in the table below: FEE PER UNIT OF CAPACITY Dry Weather Flow Wet Weather Flow BOD TSS Units M d an d ( a ) lbs /da b lbs /da ( b SDC -R Unit Costs $ 53, , 535 $ 00 $ 2-2 ($ ) ($69.23) 69 SDC -I Unit Costs $ 681, , 011 $ 892, ,545 $, x, 605 1, 726 t, 1, 808 TOTAL Unit Costs $ 734; , 546 $ 892, ,545 $ 4-, 1, 750 4, 745 1, 877 Numbers in parenthesis are calculated numbers and those in bold are the current fee rounded to the nearest dollar. a) Wet weather peak instantaneous flow expressed in million gallons per day b) Wet weather maximum month loading expressed in pounds per day The schedule and method of collecting the Millersburg SDC fee, including the timing in relationship to actual increases in demand, will be discussed with Millersburg through negotiations to update the service agreement. SDC IMPROVEMENT FEE CREDIT a credit against the sewer SDC -I fee shall be Pursuant to Albany Municipal Code Section ( 2), given for the cost of a qualified public sewer improvement required as a condition of development approval and identified in the Wastewater Facility Plan ( June 1998) as a project to be wholly or partially funded with sewer SDC -I fees. A list of SDC -I eligible collection system projects is attached to this resolution as Appendix III and will be adjusted using ENR Seattle Construction Cost Index in July of each year from the original index of The SDC -I credit shall not exceed the ENR- adjusted dollar amount in the SDC -I Eligible Project List Appendix III) associated with the qualified sewer improvement. If the credit exceeds the amount of sewer SDC -I fee to be paid by the development, then the excess credit may be applied against sewer improvement fees that accrue in subsequent phases of the original development project. In summary, credits are possible only for projects identified in the Sewer SDC -I Eligible Project List (Appendix III) and only to the extent that it is SDC -I funded. On Site: To qualify for an on -site SDC -I credit, a required sewer improvement must be listed in the Sewer SDC -I Eligible Project List (Appendix III) and it must be located in whole or in part, on or contiguous to the property. The applicant shall have the burden of demonstrating that a particular qualified sewer improvement is eligible for an SDC -I credit Sewer System Development Charges Exhibit A - Page 4 of 5

6 The applicant shall submit project data including the constructed length and size of "on- site" pipe and the minimum pipe size necessary to serve the particular development. The applicant shall submit the actual on- site" project cost to the City for review. The City will compare the applicant's actual " on- site" cost per foot to the ENR- adjusted unit cost per foot found in Appendix III. The applicant's maximum eligible project cost will be calculated by multiplying the lesser unit cost per foot by the actual length of "on- site" pipe. The City will calculate the cost to construct the minimum required " development using the ENR- adjusted cost per foot found in Appendix III and the actual length of pipe constructed " on- site." The SDC -I credit will be based on the cost of constructing an oversized pipe that is greater than the minimum required to serve the development. The minimum required pipe size shall either be the minimum pipe size necessary for the particular development needs, or an eight -inch pipe, whichever is greater. on- site" pipe to serve the The difference between the eligible project cost and the estimated cost to construct the minimum necessary pipe will be the maximum SDC -I credit available for the development. Off Site: To qualify for an off -site SDC -I credit, a required sewer improvement must be listed in the Sewer SDC -I Eligible Project List ( Appendix 1II) and the required sewer improvement must not be located on, fronting, or adjacent to the property. The credit shall be the lower of the actual construction cost and the calculated oversizing cost using the ENR- adjusted cost per foot of the minimum pipe size ( as defined above) for the project. APPEAL FEE Pursuant to Albany Municipal Code Section ( 5), an appeal fee of $100 per appeal is hereby established. Appeal submittal by parties appealing their calculated fee ( AMC Section ( 3)) shall conform to AMC Section procedure Sewer System Development Charges Exhibit A - Page 5 of5

7 APPENDIX I CITY OF ALBANY COMMERCIAL CUSTOMER CLASSIFICATION COMBINED AVERAGE STRENGTH CATEGORIES & STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION Waste Characteristic Allocation: The City of Albany does not have a monitoring program for all commercial customers and consequently does not have specific monitoring data on all of Albany's commercial customers. However, an extensive project was undertaken by the City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services ( BES) to determine wastewater characteristics by Standard Industry Classification ( SIC) codes based upon monitoring data for Portland' s customers and using data from other cities. The City of Portland' s wastewater characteristic study data is based on BOD and TSS information from commercial customers in Portland and 28 additional cities and the customer list is representative of the Albany commercial businesses. The City of Salem is also using the Portland BES data to classify their commercial customers. Albany will continue to refine this database as additional waste characterization data becomes known. COMMERCIAL LOW - STRENGTH (UP TO 450 MG/L COMBINED BOD/TSS) Offices and Services: Accounting, Auditing, and Bookkeeping Services ( 8721) Adjustment and Collection Services ( 7322) Amusement and Recreation Services NEC ( 7999) Banks and Credit Unions ( 6021, 6022, 6141) Barber and Beauty Shops ( 7241, 723 1) Child Day Care Services ( 8351) Computer and Computer Software Stores ( 5734) Correctional Institutions ( 9223) Employment Agencies ( 7361) Engineering Services ( 8711) Gasoline Service Stations ( 5541) Individual and Family Social Services ( 8322) Insurance Agents, Brokers, and Service ( 6411) Investment Advice (6282) Legal Services ( 8111) Libraries ( 823 1) Medical and Dental Offices and Clinics (including chiropractors, health practitioners, optometrists) 8011, 8021, 8041, 8042, 8049) Motels ( 7011) Museums and Art Galleries ( 8412) Nursing Care Facilities ( 805 1) Schools ( Elementary and Secondary) and Educational Services ( 8211) Taxicabs ( 412 1) Title Insurance ( 6361) Trucking - local with storage ( 4214) General Retail Businesses: Apparel, Accessory, Jewelry and Shoe Stores ( 5699, 5641, 5651, 5944, 5661) Auto equipment/ supplies, new /used - NEC ( see printout) Beer, Ale, and Liquor Stores - wholesale and distribution ( 5181 and 5921) Boat Dealers ( 5551) Book Stores ( 5942) Coin - Operated Laundries ( 7215) Department Stores ( 5311) Floor Covering Stores ( 5713) Florists ( 5992) Groceries, wholesale and distribution ( 5141) Hobby, Toy, and Game Shops ( 5945) 2014 Sewer System Development Charges Appendix 1- Page I of2

8 Home Furnishings and Hardware Stores ( 5719, 525 1) Miscellaneous food stores - minimarts without kitchens ( 5499) Musical Instrument Stores ( 5736) Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores ( sales but no mixing) ( 523 1) Sporting Goods Stores and Bicycle Shops ( 5941) Tobacco Stores and Standards ( 5993) Used Merchandise Stores ( 5932) Video Tape Rental ( 7841) COMMERCIAL MEDIUM- STRENGTH (451-1, 125 MG/L COMBINED BOD/TSS) Automotive/Mechanical Repair and/ or Wash: Airports, Flying Fields, and Airport Terminal Services Automotive Repair Shops NEC ( see printout) Carwashes ( 7542) Motor Vehicle Dealers - used cars ( 5521) Specialty with medium - strength waste discharge: Dry Cleaning Facilities (7216) Restaurants, Eating Places, Bars, and Taverns ( 5812) Funeral Services and Crematories ( 7261) Hospitals ( 8060) Junior Colleges and Technical Institutes ( 8222) Meat and Fish Markets, Including Freezer Provisioners ( 5421) Paints /Varnishes /Lacquers /Enamels mixing (285 1) Photofinishing Laboratories ( 7384) Recreational Vehicle Parks ( 7033) Trucking local with storage ( 4212) COMMERCIAL HIGH - STRENGTH (GREATER THAN 1, 126 MG/L COMBINED BOD/ TSS) Automotive: Exhaust System Repair ( 7533), Transmission Repair ( 7537), Tire Shop ( 7534), General Automotive Repair see printout), Automotive Services ( 7549), Armature Rewinding Shop ( 7694) Motor Vehicle Dealers - new cars ( 5511) Specialty with high - strength waste discharge: Candy, Nut, and Confectionery Stores ( 5441) Disinfecting and Pest Control Services ( 7342) Fire Protection ( 9224) Grocery Stores with garbage disposals ( 5412) Industrial Launderers ( 7218) Malt Beverage Brewery (2082) Pharmaceutical Preparations ( 2834) Retail Bakeries - with kitchen ( 546 1) Printing and Stamping on Fabric Articles - silk screening ( 2396) Trucking - long distance, not local (4213) Passenger car rental, no drivers for hire ( 7514) 2014 Sewer System Development Charges Appendix I - Page 2 of2

9 APPENDIX II SAMPLE CUSTOMER' S DEBT SERVICE CREDIT CALCULATION This table shows how a sample non - residential customer' s debt service credit would be calculated. The first step is to determine the relative EDUs for sample customer by comparing the sample customer's loading relative to a residential customer's loading for each parameter. Dry Weather Flow Wet Weather BOD TSS Flow Units M d rn d a lbs /da b lbs/da b Customer' s EDUs by specific parameter: Sample Customer's Capacity Requirement (a) Residential Capacity Requirement a) Insert the customer specific capacity requirements here. EDUs The The next next step step is is to to distribute distribute the the total total debt debt service service credit credit per per EDU EDU ($ ($ / / EDU) EDU) across across the the parameters parameters using using the the same same allocation allocation factors factors used used to to distribute distribute future future improvement improvement projects projects across across the the parameters. parameters. Debt Debt Service Service Credit Credit by by parameter: parameter: Dry Weather Flow Wet Weather BOD TSS, Total Total Flow Flow Units M d m d a lbs/da b lbs lbs / / da da bb Debt Service Credit Improvement Allocation % % 46.22% % % 100% Debt Service Credit per EDU $ $ The The last last step step is is to to apply apply the the sample sample customer' customer' ss EDUs EDUs by by parameter parameter to to the the debt debt service service credit credit distributed distributed by by parameter parameter to to arrive arrive at at the the sample sample customer' customer' ss debt debt service service credit credit by by parameter. parameter. The The sum sum of of the the distributed distributed sample sample customer' customer' ss debt debt service service credit credit factors factors is is the the sample sample customer' customer' ss debt debt service service credit credit ( ( in in this this example, example, $ $ 779). 779). Dry, Weather Wet Weather Flow Flow BOD TSS Total Units M d m d a lbs /da b lbs /da b Customer' s Debt Service Credit: EDUs by parameter Debt Service Credit by parameter Sample Customer' s Debt Service Credit $ Sewer Sewer System System Development Development Charges Charges Appendix Appendix II II - - Page Page II of of II

10 APPENDIX III SDC -I Eligible Collection & Treatment Projects Pipe Extension Project Location Diameter Approx Cost per inches) Length feet) Foot 8 -inch Total Equivalent SDC -I Protect Cost Eligible Cost Cost (a) 109 /ft El Springhill Drive Hickory Road to 700 feet N of Country Club Lane 15 7, , 450, , , 000 E2 Ellingson Road R/ R tracks to Lochner Road 10 3, , , , 000 E3 Columbus Street Columbus Street Lift Station to city limits , , , 000 E4 Columbus Street City limits to 7 -Mile Lane , , ,000 E5 Mennonite Home Columbus Street to 54th Avenue , , , 000 E6 Grand Prairie Road Waverly Drive to Interstate , , , , 000 E7 21 st Avenue Shortridge Street to Rye Street 21 2, , , ,000 E8 21st Avenue Rye Street to Three Lakes Road , , , 000 E9 Lexington Street 21st Avenue to 25th Avenue 12 1, , , ,000 E10 Three Lakes Road 21st Avenue to 90 degree bend 18 2, , , ,000 Ell Three Lakes Road 90 degree bend to Grand Prairie Road 15 2, , , ,000 E12 Charlotte to Bernard Charlotte Street to east end of Bernard Avenue 15 5, , 200, , , 000 E13 Price to Scravel Price Road to Scravel Hill Road 12 7, , 160, , ,000 E14 Highway feet E of Timber Street to Scravel Hill Road 12 5, , , ,000 Pipe Pipe Replacement Replacement project project Total Total Growth Growth SDC SDC - - II Location Location Project Project Allocation Allocation Eligible Eligible Cost Cost Cost Cost ( ( a a ) ) Percents' Percents' ee RI RI Riverfront Interceptor Downstream Downstream of of Baker Baker Street Street to to Geary Geary Street Street 5, 5, 500, 500, % 32% 1, 1, 760, 760, R2 Riverfront Interceptor Calapooia Street to downstream of Baker Street 1, 100, % 352, 000 R3 Calapooia Interceptor Upstream of Maple Street to 12th Avenue 1, 600, % 672, 000 R4 Cox Creek Interceptor Heatherdale Mobile Village to Salem Avenue 1, 1, 900, 900, % 71% 1, 1, 349, 349, R5 R5 28th Avenue Downstream Downstream of of Geary Geary Street Street to to Upstream Upstream of of Jackson Jackson Street Street 500,000 5% 25, 25, R6 47th Avenue West of Columbus Street to Columbus Street 600,000 69% 414,000 R7 Knox Butte Road 1400 feet E of Clover Ridge Road to Century Drive Pump Station 1, 100,000 79% 869, 000 R8 Price Road Santiam Highway to Bain Street 1, 900, % 1, 520,000 14,200, 000 6,961, 000 Pump Stations (Upgrades & New) Total Project Costa Growth Allocation Percentage SDC -I Eligible Cost P1 Oak Creek 500, % 500,000 P2 34th Avenue 900,000 14% 126, 000 P3 Charlotte Street 100, % 59, 000 P4 Maple Street 800, % 800, 000 P5 Thornton Lake 200, % 200, 000 P6 Columbus Street 600, % 600, 000 P7 Springhill Drive 300, % 300, 000 Total Growth Growth Project Treatment Treatment Plant Plant Improvements Improvements ( ( to to 2020) 2020) Project Allocation Allocation Cost Costa Percentage Percentage SDC SDC - - II Eligible Eligible Cost Cost Headworks Headworks 8, 800, % 2, 935,000 Influent Pumping 5, 100, % Screening Screening 2, 400, % Grit Removal & Primary Influent Flow Split 1, 300, % Primary Clarifiers & Sludge Pumping 6, 900,000 6, 900,000 48% 3, 312, 000 Secondary Treatment 22, 700,000 40% 9, 169, 000 Aeration Basins 3, 600,000 44% Secondary Clarifiers & RAS/ WAS 11, 800, % Chlorination 6, 300, % New outfall/diffuser & upgrade existing 1, 000, % Solids Solids Handling Handling 8, 600,000 64% 64% 5, 520,000 DAF thickening 300, % Anaerobic digestion 3, 100, % Biosolids Facility 5, 200, % Miscellaneous Plant Control & Electrical 2, 100, % 975, 000 Plant water system 500, % Septage receiving & storage 500, % Shop /control room 600, % Electrical and I & C 500, % Source: City of Albany Wastewater Facility Plan ( 1998 C: H2NI- Hill) a) Project costs include 25% contingency and 30% ELA and are rounded 2014 Sewer System Development Charges Appendix III - Page I of I