START FROM TYPICAL PROBLEMS

Transcription

1

2

3 Chapter I.

4 START FROM TYPICAL PROBLEMS Small Land and Large Population 1 % of USA and Canada, 15% of German, 26% of Japan Undeveloped Industry In 1954,GNP was $US 70 with electricity capacity of 127 Mwe Young independent nation Political Instability, Weak Government, Little Experience Insufficient domestic private capital Downward equalization of living standards from Korea War 4

5 TODAY s KOREA One of the Industrialized Countries In 2008,GNP was $US 20,000 with electricity capacity of 17,761 Mwe Many Global Companies SAMSUNG, HYUNDAI, LG etc., Held International Sports Events 88 Seoul Olympic, 02 World-Cup, 14 Asian Game Highest Information Technology 2 nd Rank on ICT Development Index (154 countries) 5

6 6

7 Chapter II.

8 (Year 2007) Source : Nucleonics Week Magazine in U.S. Source : KHNP Data 8

9 Nuclear Coal Gas Oil Hydro (As of the end of 2007) *The others : 351 MW(0.5%) Total : 68,268 MW *The others : 829 GWh(0.2%) Total : 403,124 GWh 9

10 Ulchin 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 Shin-Ulchin 1&2(Planned) Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility (Under construction) Wolsong 1, 2, 3 & 4 Shin-Wolsong 1 & 2 (Under Construction) Younggwang 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 Kori 1, 2, 3 & 4 Shin-Kori 1-4 (UnderConstruction) 10

11 Project Reactor Type Capacity (MW) Model Commercial Operation Remark Shin- Kori Shin- Wolsong #1 #2 #3 #4 #1 #2 PWR 1000 OPR1000 Dec Under PWR 1000 OPR1000 Dec Construction PWR 1400 APR1400 Sep Under PWR 1400 APR1400 Sep Construction PWR 1000 OPR1000 Mar.2012 Under PWR 1000 OPR1000 Jan Construction Shin- Ulchin #1 #2 PWR 1400 APR1400 Dec.2015 PWR 1400 APR1400 Dec Planned Additional nuclear power(2017~2022) will be set up in the end of this year by the 4 th Basic Plan of Long-term Electricity Supply & Demand issued by the government ; 4-5 nuclear units are expected. OPR1000 : Optimized Power Reactor 1000MW APR1400 : Advanced Power Reactor 1400MW 11

12 From First Concrete to COD 7M 57M 9M 53M 7M 51M 9M 47M 7M 6M 46M 41M YGN3&4 UCN3&4 YGN5&6 UCN5&6 SKN1&2 SWN1&2 12

13 Chapter III.

14 1978 Operation & localization 1990 Establish Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety 1989 Start construction localized plant 1981 Establish Nuclear Safety Center 1969 construction 1978 Commercial operation of NPP 1975 Entry into force of NPT, Join CSA 1971 Start first NPP construction in turnkey-basis 1961 plan 1968 Confirm long-term plan & Invite Bid for NPP & Sign NPT 1964 Start Site Evaluation and Selection (confirm site in 1966) 1961 Establish KEPCO & First Five Year Economic Development Plan 1956 preparation 1958 Enact Atomic Energy Act & Establish Atomic Energy Department 1957 Join IAEA 1956 Delegation for First ICPUAE & ROK-US Atomic Energy Agreement 14

15 15

16 INTEGRATION OF KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE NP Program required the various knowledge and experience Wide range of knowledge and experience gathered in NEPIO Wide knowledge & Experience From In/outside area Survey Necessary information & Communicate more often Synergy effects within program 16

17 STRONG AUTHORITY FOR LEADER Organization Involving chart of diverse NEPIO organization in program in Korean NPP (1961) Need firm leadership with clear goals and Responsibility of each organization Ministry level government s agency directly Responsible to the President 17

18 INVESTMENT AND GUARANTEE OF GOVERNMENT No major cost recovery source until first operation of NPP Large-scale and long-term investment No private company in developing countries can maintain the project With government s long-term guarantee, the stakeholders of the program can participate with reduced risk of investment 18

19 ESTABLISHING SELF-RELIANT EDUCATION SYSTEM For initial manpower, guarantee high position in public officer, high salary, good location Solving the demand of high level expertise, inviting foreign experts For establishing self reliance education system, launching undergraduate course Inviting lectures from abroad & benchmark Adding education program in contract of NPP 19

20 LOCALIZATION POLICY Localization Policy Learning by Participating Accumulating experience and knowledge by participating construction with reputed foreign company Turn-key base nuclear onstruction Government s drive 20

21 INADEQUATE ATTENTION TO R.W. DISPOSAL Takes 20years to acquire public acceptance Start publicity activities from the beginning Start official activity after accumulating significant amount of radioactive waste in candidate site evaluation stopped by local resistance LILW storage selection history By Confirm site for LILW disposal facility : Delayed about 20years from initial plan 1990s Vigorous publicity activities about necessity & safety Not include HLW in storage Change Concept: Second research institute charging radioactive waste also stopped by media s exposure and anti-nuclear movement 21

22 Chapter IV.

23 23

24 Oil Coal Nuclear LNG Ren. & Others <2007 : 241 MTOE> <2030 : 300 MTOE> Increase of Clean Energy Supply Nuclear Decrease of Fossil Fuel Supply Oil Coal LNG Nuclear Coal LNG Nuclear Power Expansion in E-Mix Renew ables 24

25 Reliable energy supply and the cheapest energy source Clean energy without emitting CO 2 and air pollutants 25

26 5000 Nuclear Capacity (10 MW) Nuclear Capacity (%) ( ) Nuclear Power Generation(%)

27 Upgrading key-components according to their recommendations 27

28 Benefits of plant construction directly given to the residents Promoting and assuring the public of nuclear safety 28

29 The saturated space for spent fuels at temporary storage To set up final framework and disposal method after long-term open discussion 100,000 drum-capacity storage of cavern type at the 1st stage in 2010 Expanding the storage to 800,000 drum-capacity by stages 29

30 Foster human resources for nuclear power deployment Provided advice/consultations to developing countries - Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand, Romania IAEA, OECD/NEA, INPO, WANO, APEC.. GNEP, GEN-IV, ITER.. 30

31