Filip Neele E T

Transcription

1 CO2Europipe Filip Neele E filip.neele@tno.nl T

2 CO2Europipe Aim Define requirements for development of future, large-scale CCS transport network in Europe EU, national initiatives / regulations Timeline for policies / regulatory frameworks to be put in place Method Define future large-scale CCS transport requirements CO 2 volumes: what, where, when? Network lay-out ((inter)national, simple or complex) CO 2 management (cross-border issues) Regulations (CO 2 as waste?) Timeline April 2009 through October

3 Project philosophy Aim Define conditions for development of large-scale EU CCS infrastructure Basic idea: Large-scale CO 2 infrastructure will evolve from local initiatives Relevance for EU What is the most efficient road towards this long-term goal? What is the role for EU? Project results Definition of most efficient road Identification of hurdles Recommendations for EU (and national authorities) based on Real or realistic scenarios analysed at business case level 3

4 Future (long-term) CCS infrastructure lay-outs Identify likely ones from current knowledge of timing of capture and storage Study architectures: technical, societal, environmental, etc impacts Use current situation as starting point Develop business cases for likely architectures, plus impact of upscaling for large-scale infrastructure Derive recommendations 4

5 Business cases Early projects 1. Rotterdam Storage DCS 2. Rhine / Ruhr area, Northern Germany Storage in North Sea, through Emden or Rotterdam 3. Norwegian mainland North Sea Kårstø offshore CO 2 pipeline 4. Options for CCS in central Europe Poland, Czech Republic National; cross-border

6 Consortium Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek- TNO Stichting Energieonderzoek Centrum Nederland - ECN Etudes et Productions Schlumberger Vattenfall Research & Development AB Gasunie Engineering BV Linde Gas Benelux BV Siemens AG RWE DEA AG E.ON Benelux NV PGE Polska Gruppa Energetyczna SA CEZ AS Shell Downstream Services International BV CO2-Net BV CO2-Global AS Nacap Benelux BV Gassco AS Anthony Velder CO2 Shipping BV E.ON Engineering Ltd Stedin BV France Sweden Germany Germany, Belgium, Luxemburg Poland Czech Republic, United Kingdom Norway Norway United Kingdom 6

7 Key results: transport requirements CO 2 captured volumes from economic growth scenarios PRIMES Country specific emission reduction targets % CCS, % energy saving, % renewables Storage capacity EU FP7 Geocapacity database Use storage capacity of clusters Years 2020, 2030,

8 CO 2 source clusters Geocapacity database Assign to each cluster: volume of captured CO 2 through time 8

9 Sink maps (gas fields) Geocapacity database Assign to each cluster: available storage capacity through time, plus annual injection rate 9

10 CO 2 transport infrastructure Match: captured volumes (Mt/yr) with storage capacity (Mt) and injection rates (Mt/yr) 10

11 Further work Define country-specific rules / assumptions on the development of CCS: Onshore vs. offshore Depleted gas fields vs. aquifer storage Timing Create transport infrastructure Country specific scenarios for storage and capture Map development from early projects ( one-on-one ) towards more complex connected projects Match: injection rate with capture rate Assume fill rate for gas fields, aquifers 11

12 Issues addressed Study development from early projects ( one-on-one ) towards more complex connected projects Costs of oversizing Required rate of growth of infrastructure (network) Who will pay? National level, EU level Organisation Regulating body National level, EU level CO 2 quality standards 12

13 13