User Needs- A State s Perspective

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "User Needs- A State s Perspective"

Transcription

1 User Needs- A State s Perspective End Users Science Management Public Steven Greb-Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

2 User Needs- A State s Perspective End Users Science Management Public Episodic Events Long term trends Problem solving Steven Greb-Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

3 Wisconsin Water Resources facts Owned by the citizens under Public Trust Doctrine Over 15,000 lakes, 1 million acres (3%) Most Common Name- Mud Lake 44,000 miles of river and streams, 4700 dams, lead country in dam busting Over ½ million registered boats Recreation is $11 billion industry

4 Monitoring Challenges w/ respect to EO Lake Size Culm. frac Lake Area (ha) Hydrologic Residence Times Streams Rivers Shallow Lakes Deep Karst Groundwater Deep Aquifer Hours Days Months Years Decades Century Millinium

5 Primary monitoring categories established by Wisconsin DNR Tier 1: Statewide Baseline Monitoring Tier 2: Targeted Evaluation Monitoring Tier 3: Management Effectiveness & Compliance Monitoring

6 Primary monitoring categories established by Wisconsin DNR Tier 1: Statewide Baseline Monitoring- Annual Water Clarity of Lakes via Remote Sensing Tier 2: Targeted Evaluation Monitoring Tier 3: Management Effectiveness & Compliance Monitoring

7 Water Clarity Map-Northcentral WI

8 Potential Surface-Water Parameters via Remote Sensing for Limnological Investigations Water Clarity (Secchi depth) Surface Chlorophyll Conc. Floating Algal Accumulation (Toxicity issues) Macrophyte Abundance, Distribution, and Speciation Color, Humic Substances, Dissolved Organic Carbon Suspended Solids Surface Temperature Ice break-up and freezing dates Drainage Basin Land Use Benthic Type and Coverage Water Levels and Water body Morphology (size,shape)

9 Potential Surface-Water Parameters via Remote Sensing for Limnological Investigations Water Clarity (Secchi depth) Surface Chlorophyll Conc. Floating Algal Accumulation, HABs (Toxicity issues) Macrophyte Abundance, Distribution, and Speciation Color, Humic Substances, Dissolved Organic Carbon Suspended Solids Surface Temperature Ice break-up and freezing dates Drainage Basin Land Use Benthic Type and Coverage Water Levels and Water body Morphology (size,shape)

10 Potential Surface-Water Parameters via Remote Sensing for Limnological Investigations Water Clarity (Secchi depth) Surface Chlorophyll Conc. Floating Algal Accumulation, HABs (Toxicity issues) Macrophyte Abundance, Distribution, and Speciation Color, Humic Substances, Dissolved Organic Carbon Suspended Solids Surface Temperature Ice break-up and freezing dates Drainage Basin Land Use Benthic Type and Coverage Water Levels and Water body Morphology (size,shape)

11 Potential Surface-Water Parameters via Remote Sensing for Limnological Investigations Water Clarity (Secchi depth) Surface Chlorophyll Conc. Floating Algal Accumulation (Toxicity issues) Macrophyte Abundance, Distribution, and Speciation Color, Humic Substances, Dissolved Organic Carbon Suspended Solids Surface Temperature Ice break-up and freezing dates Drainage Basin Land Use Benthic Type and Coverage Water Levels and Water body Morphology (size,shape)

12 Potential Surface-Water Parameters via Remote Sensing for Limnological Investigations Water Clarity (Secchi depth) Surface Chlorophyll Conc. Floating Algal Accumulation (Toxicity issues) Macrophyte Abundance, Distribution, and Speciation Color, Humic Substances, Dissolved Organic Carbon Suspended Solids Surface Temperature Ice break-up and freezing dates Drainage Basin Land Use Benthic Type and Coverage Water Levels and Water body Morphology (size,shape)

13 Technology push but still waiting for end-user pull Robert Bukata Science Management Accessibility to reliable and well documented archival data Lack of universal standards Institutional and historic adherence to historical monitoring protocols Suspect reputation of remote sensing technologies In the past, promised more than they delivered. Need processing software (e.g.beam)

14 GEO WORK PLAN The GEO Work Plan provides the agreed framework for implementing the GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan ( ). It is a living document that is updated annually.

15 Inland and Near-Coastal Water Quality Remote Sensing working group Research Consultation Education & CB Advocacy Applications

16 WA-01: WATER TASK Work Plan C1 Integrated Water-cycle Products and Services C2 Information Systems for Hydro-meteorological Extremes (incl. Floods and Droughts) C3 Information Service for Cold Regions C4 Global Water Quality Products and Services C5 Information System Development and Capacity Building

17 C4: Global Water Quality Products and Services

18 Moving Forward C4 Global Water Quality Products and Services Develop Work Plan Task Coordination Data Products/ Indicators Information Knowledge/ Decision Making Tools Feedback Fast Track End-to-End application Component Data Products/Indicators Information Knowledge/ Decision Making tools End-to-end application Coordination Suggested Remote Sensing Team Leader(s) Arnold Dekker, Tiit Kutser, Menghua Wang Paul DiGiacomo, Stewart Bernard, Mark Dowell Gordon Campbell, Hans van der Woerd Chris Mannerts, Suhyb Salama Steve Groom Steven Greb, Arnold Dekker

19 C4 Global Water Quality Products and Services This component aims to develop international operational water quality information systems based on Earth observation. This component encompasses both the collation and development of in-situ water quality databases and remote-sensed data, particularly space-borne data. The component addresses both flowing and static water bodies, recognizes differing approaches to assessing their water quality and the linkages/interface betweeen them The goal of this component is to integate water quality data from multiple sources in a timely manner and through data assimilatation of Earth observation with other sources of data such as water quantity, hydrodynamics, biogeochemical modelling, generate higher level information products