Pre- feasibility study Case study 1

Transcription

1 En BW 50Her t z Pre- feasibility study Case study 1 Copenhagen, May 23rd Andreas Möser, Lund University

2 Pr e- feasibility study - Case Study 1 2 Ou tlin e Approach Technical assum pt ions Scenario structure High & Low of f shor e w ind ener gy developm ent Var ious HVDC- int egr at ion levels Scenarios designs and roadm aps Scenario com parison Ext ended analysis

3 Pre- feasibility study Case St u d y 1 3 Approach Technology assum ptions Localizations and Design of OWE Wind Turbine & foundation layouts Cable layouts & Transform ator stations 2 visions, high and low Localisation and Design of offshore network Onshore connection points Offshore substations Var ious levelsof HVDC- integration Zero, Partial, M ax CS1 Com ponent list/cost- benef it Grid functions and services Power flow and DC- protection analysis Input to m arket analysis, spatial planning, regulatory quest ions, et c.

4 Technology assumptions 4 Wind tubrines Pre-2030: Post-2030: 8 MW 12 MW OWF1 OWF2 Technology Catalogue by DTU Inter-array voltage Pre and post 2030: AC export cables Pre and post 2030: 66 kv AC AC transformer substations Pre and post 2030: 600 MW kv AC Converter technology VSC: Modular Multi level System: Symetrical Monopole or Bipole HVDC cable voltage (available) Pre-2030: ± 525 kv 2500 MW Post-2030: ± 640 kv 3000 MW AC onshore grid Pre and post 2030: kv AC

5 Scenario structure 5 Scenarios level OWP level Scen ar i o Zero Sce n a r io 1a Sce n a r io 1b Partial Scenario 2a Scenario 2b Max. Scenario 3a Scenario 3b

6 H igh / vis ion s 6 OWP capacity: 11.2 GW, 47 TWh/y H ig h OWP GW 1.7 GW 4.8 GW 3.2 GW

7 High/ visions OWP capacity: 5.7 GW, 24 TWh/y 0.9 GW 2.5 GW 2.3 GW

8 Wind turbine & cable layouts Detailed view Slupsk 8 300

9 Scenario structure 9 Scenarios level OWP level Scen ar i o Zero Sce n a r io 1a Sce n a r io 1b Partial Scenario 2a Scenario 2b Max. Scenario 3a Scenario 3b

10 Scenario concept level 10 Scenarios level OWP level Scen ar i o Onshore AC- & DC connection points Zero Sce n a r io 1a Sce n a r io 1b Partial Scenario 2a Scenario 2b Max. Scenario 3a Scenario 3b

11 Scenario concept level 11 Scenarios level OWP level Scen ar i o Onshore AC- & DC connection points Zero Sce n a r io 1a Sce n a r io 1b Partial Scenario 2a Scenario 2b Max. Scenario 3a Scenario 3b Only onshore DC connection points

12 Scenario structure 12 Scenarios level OWP level Scen ar i o Zero Sce n a r io 1a Sce n a r io 1b Partial Scenario 2a Scenario 2b Max. Scenario 3a Scenario 3b

13 1a., Zero integration DC Overview 13 2x DC 1 GW 1.4 GW OWP capacity: 11.2 GW, 47 TWh/y 2x DC 1.4 GW 3x AC 1 GW 2x AC 1.4 GW 1.4 GW 1 GW 2x DC 1 GW 2x AC 1.2 GW 0.9 GW GW 1 GW 2x DC 1.2 GW 0.9 GW 4x AC 2x 4x DC AC Cables viewed schematically

14 Scenario structure 14 Scenarios level OWP level Scen ar i o Zero Sce n a r io 1a Sce n a r io 1b Partial Scenario 2a Scenario 2b Max. Scenario 3a Scenario 3b

15 3a., Max integration DC Overview 15 2 GW OWP capacity: 11.2 GW, 47 TWh/y 1x DC 2x DC 1.5 GW 1.5 GW 1.4 GW 1.4 GW 1x 2 GW DC 1.2 GW 0.9 GW GW 1.5 GW 1.2 GW 2 GW 2x DC 2 GW 1.2 GW 1.5 GW 2x DC Cables viewed schematically

16 Scenario structure 16 Scenarios level OWP level Scen ar i o Zero Sce n a r io 1a Sce n a r io 1b Partial Scenario 2a Scenario 2b Max. Scenario 3a Scenario 3b

17 2a. Part integration Overview Grid 17 2 GW OWP capacity: 11.2 GW, 47 TWh/y 1.5 GW 1.4 GW 1.4 GW 2 GW 1.2 GW 0.9 GW GW 1.5 GW Cables viewed schematically

18 Component comparison 18 Zero vs Partial vs Max grid integration Feat ure I nt egrat ion Zero ( 1a) Par t ial (2a) M ax (3a) DC converter subst at ions DC cable lengt h (km ) DC conductor volume (km* mm 2 ) 3.8 * * * 10 6 OWP on DC syst em (GW) Onshore AC transformers AC expor t cable lengt h (km ) AC export cond. vol. (km* mm 2 ) 1.7* * ,6 * 10 6

19 Extended analysis 19

20 Integrated power trade with wind Exam ple 1 20

21 Integrated power trade with wind Exam ple 2 21

22 Integrated power trade with wind Exam ple 3 22 Intra hour power flow Utilization rates

23 Partial designs (2a) with DC breaker alternatives 23 Full DC protection ( 15) Cap : 2 GW Regional HVDC sys (1) Cap : 2 GW Regional HVDC sys (1) Cap : 1.5 GW Converter substation AC-breaker DC-breaker Separated system (0) Cap : 0 GW

24 Con t act & Disclaim er 24 For further inform ation: Mail: info@baltic- integrid.eu Web: integrid.eu Baltic In tegrid represented by the Lead Partner: Institute for Clim a t e Protection, En ergy and Mobility (IKEM) Magazinstraße 15-16, Be r lin, Ger m a n y Phone: +49 (0) Mail: info@ikem.de Web: online.de Andreas Möser Research Engineer Box 118, SE Lund, Sweden Phone: +46 (0) Mail: andreas.moser@iea.lth.se Web: Andreas Möser Project Engineer M: andreas.moser@afconsult.com ÅF Industry AB P.O. Box 585, SE Malmö Visit: Hallenborgs gata 4 afconsult.com LinkedIn Green Advisor to four National Olympic Committees The content of the presentation reflects the author s/ partner s views and the EU Com m ission and the MA/ JS are not liable for any use that may be made of the inform ation contained therein. All im ages are copyrighted and property of their respective owners.