SSIP Southeast Treatment Plant Project Updates

Transcription

1 SSIP Southeast Treatment Plant Project Updates SFPUC CAC Chris Colwick. SSIP Communications Manager Jignesh Desai, Senior Project Manager, SFPUC

2 Meeting Objectives and Agenda Agenda: 1. Update on Phase 1 of SSIP 2. Update on the Headworks Facility and Biosolids Digester Facilities projects

3 SSIP PHASE 1 UPDATE CHRIS COLWICK, SSIP COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER 3

4 Program Status (as of December 2016) Project Count by Phase Expenditures ($) CLOSE-OUT $31M (1 Project) COMPLETED $48M (10 Projects) PRE-PLANNING $33M (4 Projects) PLANNING $351M (19 Projects) DESIGN $2,252M (21 Projects) CONSTRUCTION $143M (11 Projects) BID & AWARD $51M (4 Projects) TOTAL $2.91B (70 Projects) % Complete 16% of Phase 1 Projects 4

5 Program Status (as of December 2016) Project Name Biosolids Digester Facilities Project (BDFP) SEP New Headworks (Grit) Replacement SEP Distributed Control System (DCS) Upgrade SEP Primary & Secondary Treatment Upgrades SEP 521/522 and Disinfection Upgrades Oceanside Treatment Plant & Westside PS North Point Facility Projects Central Bayside System Improvement Project Final Design, Bid & Award, and Construction in Phase 2 Planning, Environmental, & Design Other PreConstruction Bid & Award Construction Close Out 5

6 SSIP Phase 1: Jobs Report Apprenticeships (Entry-level) Provided by SSIP SSIP Local Hire Ordinance Achievement Other 28% SF 72% < 36% 20-30% Actual Local Hire Percentage Requirements SSIP Local Hire Percentage Achieved SF residents have worked 72% of hours (as compared to 50% requirement) and earned a combined $1.2M in wages & benefits San Francisco residents have earned a combined $5.5M in wages & benefits on SSIP projects 6

7 SSIP Phase 1: Jobs & Contracts Report 7

8 Stakeholder Outreach to Date 58 Street Fairs 96 Workshops 279 tours with 4,300+ attendees 103 presentations 1,900+ ipad Surveys 4,800+ MetroQuest Surveys 2+ Million reached on social media 5,805 Facebook Likes 14,092 Twitter Followers 2,892 LinkedIn Connections 8

9 HEADWORKS PROJECT JIGNESH DESAI, PROJECT MANAGER 9

10 Headworks Facility Project

11 Project Objective / Level of Service Improve odor, noise and visual quality Provide reliability and operational flexibility Improve seismic reliability Protect downstream process/equipment Meet the permitted capacity of 250 million gallons per day (MGD) Odor Control Structure Example of Rectangular Bioscrubbers 11

12 Headworks Construction Staging at SEP 12

13 Conceptual Design of New Headworks Facility 13

14 Headworks Facility Project Schedule Phase Start Finish Environmental Review September 2015 May 2017 Design November 2015 February 2018 Construction January 2017 December 2023 Start of Construction August 2017 Substantial Completion December 2021 Start-Up/Final Completion June 2022 December 2023

15 BIOSOLIDS DIGESTER FACILITIES PROJECT (BDFP) 15

16 Project Location Existing Southeast Plant New Biosolids Digester Facilities Proposed BDFP Located Adjacent to Existing Southeast Plant

17 Project Objectives Address aging infrastructure Construct new modern, proven and efficient treatment technologies Maintain regulatory compliance Build critical processes with redundant infrastructure to provide reliability and operational flexibility Improve seismic reliability Beneficially use 100% of Biosolids and Biogas produced Improve odor, noise and visual quality

18 Key Project Features Existing Conditions New Facilities (2045) Add Table here Flow 250 MGD (wet weather) 85 MGD (dry weather) 250 MGD (wet weather) 85 MGD (dry weather) Solids Loading 187,000 pounds per day 280,000 pounds per day Anaerobic Digesters Biogas Produced 9 digesters 1.8 million gallons each 1.3 million cubic feet per day Flaring: routine 5 digesters 1.66 million gallons each 2 million cubic feet per day Flaring: infrequent Electricity Generated 2 Mega watts 5 Mega watts Biosolids Reused 16,000 dry tons (2014 average) 24,000 dry tons annually Daily Biosolids Truck trips 7-10 per day per day Biosolids Regulatory Classification Odor Control Class B Does not completely contain odors from biosolids facilities to within SEP fenceline Class A SEP Staffing Levels 280 staff No change Designed to limit odors from BDFP to within SEP fenceline 18

19 Proposed New Biosolids Digester Facilities 19

20 Biosolids Project Proposed Construction Construction 5 years starting 2018 As part of Construction: Traffic Control Plan Noise and vibration control plan Potential sound wall along Phelps Clean construction ordinance Construction emissions minimization plan Cleaner construction equipment Renewable diesel Dust control plan Limit idling to 30 seconds within 100 of schools Construction trucks: 30 to 70 trucks per day Construction Period: Typical: Mon thru Fri. 7 am to 3:30 pm Extended hours and occasional Saturdays, as needed Construction staging: Contractor personal vehicles parked off-site Possible sites include Greenhouses and Port properties

21 Environmental Review Schedule Key Milestones Notice of Preparation June 2015 Public Scoping Meeting July 2015 Issue Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Public Review Period - 45 days May 2017 Planning Commission Hearing June 2017 Final EIR Certification February 2018 Notice of Determination (NOD) Filed March 2018

22 Biosolids Project Schedule Phase Start Finish Environmental Review June 2015 March 2018 Draft EIR May 2017 Final EIR March 2018 Design January 2016 August 2018 Construction August 2018 May 2024 Start of Construction August 2018 Substantial Completion August 2023 Final Completion May 2024 Start-Up / Process Stabilization August 2023 May 2025

23 CONTACT US sfwater.org/ssip

24 Rankin Street Quint Street Project Areas Existing Headworks Facilities N Bruce Flynn Pump Station Evans Avenue ICS/ SELS 011 Headworks 012 Headworks Influent Control Structure/ Southeast Lift Station

25 Environmental Review Process What will the EIR do? Describe the project and surrounding environment Identify potential environmental effects of the project Identify ways to avoid or reduce significant environmental effects through mitigation Evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project Topics evaluated in the EIR Land Use Aesthetics Population and Housing Cultural Resources Transportation Air Quality/Odors Greenhouse Gas Emissions Wind and Shadow Recreation Utilities/ Service Systems Public Services Biological Resources Geology and Soils Hydrology/Water Quality Hazards/ Hazardous Materials Minerals and Energy Resources Agriculture and Forest Resources Noise/ Vibration

26 Jerrold Street Looking West 26