ACCEPT / REJECT TABLE - TOPIC 9.5 NGĀI TAHU VALUES AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Key: A = Accept A(P) = Accept in Part R = Reject.

Transcription

1 Page 1 of 33 CCEPT / REJECT TBLE - TOPIC 9.5 NGĀI THU VLUES ND THE NTURL ENVIRONMENT Key: = ccept = ccept in Part R = Reject Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu mend Chapter 9 Decision Sought R 5.1 dd a new section to Chapter 9 entitled: 9.X Ngāi Tahu Values and the Natural Environment Objectives and Policies 9.X.1.1. Objective Scheduled reas & Sites of Ngāi Tahu Significance The historic and contemporary relationship of Ngāi Tahu mana whenua with their ancestral lands, water, sites, wāhi tapu and other taonga is recognised and provided for in the rebuild and future development of Otautahi, Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū and the greater Christchurch rea. 9.X.1.2 Objective Integrated Management of Land and Water The natural character of and Ngāi Tahu cultural values associated with water bodies, wetlands, springs (tupuna) and the coastal environment of Otautahi, Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū and the greater Christchurch rea are maintained or enhanced as part of the rebuild and future development of the District - ki uta ki tai (from source to sea). 1

2 Page 2 of 33 Decision Sought R 9.X Policy Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga (a.) void any disturbance of urupa except for activities associated with the identification and protection of such sites which are undertaken by the appropriate runanga or their authorised agent. (b.) Protect any site listed in Schedule X and shown on the Planning Maps as a site of Wāhi Tapu/Wāhi Taonga from inappropriate disturbance, damage or destruction; and ensure activities adjoining these sites do not adversely affect them. 9.X Policy: Ngā Tūranga Tūpuna Recognise the historic and contemporary relationship of Ngāi Tahu with the areas and landscapes identified in Schedule X and shown on the Planning Maps as Ngā Tūranga Tūpuna and: i. Facilitate opportunities to provide information about the historic occupation or use of these areas by Ngāi Tahu and associated values; ii. Incorporate representation of the association of Ngāi Tahu with these areas into the design of public or community buildings and facilities, and in the subdivision and development or redevelopment of residential or commercial areas; iii. Manage earthworks involving disturbance of soils to depths not previously disturbed by cultivation or building foundations; iv. Facilitate opportunities to enhance mahinga kai and other customary use of taonga species through planting and landscaping; 2

3 Page 3 of 33 Decision Sought R v. Enhance the natural character and cultural values of water bodies, tupuna/springs and wetlands, including reinstating original water courses where practicable; and vi. Maintain or restore natural features with cultural values within the area. 9.X Policy - Ngā Wai Recognise the cultural significance of the water bodies, tupuna/springs, wetlands, and coastal areas listed in Schedule XX and shown on the planning maps as ngā wai and manage the effects of land uses and activities on the surface of water to: Maintain the natural character of these water bodies where it is high and enhance it where it is degraded, including reinstating original water courses where practicable; Recognise historic and contemporary Ngāi Tahu customary uses and values associated with these water bodies and enhance opportunities for customary use and access. Ensure any land uses or activities on the surface of water in or adjoining these sites do not adversely affect taonga species or Ngāi Tahu customary uses in these areas. Ensure new land uses do not create an additional demand to be able to discharge sewage or stormwater directly into ngā wai, other water bodies or the coastal marine area; and address the need for existing land uses to discharge untreated sewage or stormwater into these areas. 9.X Policies Protection of Other Sites (a.) void damage to or destruction of Ngāi Tahu mana whenua archaeological sites listed in Schedule XX as Nga Tapuae or any 3

4 Page 4 of 33 Decision Sought R unmarked or unrecorded archaeological site when undertaking earthworks or building activities. (b.) Facilitate the further identification and classification of sites and areas of cultural significance to Ngāi Tahu mana whenua for inclusion in the district plan over time. Explanation of Objectives & Policies (or introductory section to chapter) Ngāi Tahu is the tribe whose descendants hold mana whenua over the land within the greater Christchurch District (including Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū /Banks Peninsula). They are represented by six papatipu runanga. The modern tribal structure of Ngāi Tahu and its interests in and values associated with the greater Christchurch rea are explained in Chapter 1 Introduction, Section 3.2. The Resource Management ct 1991 requires the recognition and provision of the relationship of Maori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral lands, water, sites, wāhi tapu and other taonga as a Matter of National Importance (s6(e)). For Ngāi Tahu whanau all of the greater Christchurch rea is regarded as ancestral land and Ngāi Tahu has interests in the management of all natural resources in the takiwa. Within this area there are sites and places which were used more prominently for settlement and mahinga kai. Some of these areas are classified in this plan and shown on the planning maps as wāhi tapu/ wāhi taonga; ngā tūranga tūpuna; or ngā wai. The list is not comprehensive; sometimes nga runanga prefer not to disclose sites. Of the sites that are classified: Wāhi tapu/wāhi taonga sites are protected by rules requiring resource consents for buildings & structures, earthworks or to disturb archaeological sites or remove 4

5 Page 5 of 33 Decision Sought R artefacts. Ngā tūranga tūpuna are areas of settlement or occupation in the past. These are areas or landscapes of Ngāi Tahu cultural significance. There is not usually known physical features on the sites to be protected, (there may be archaeological sites) but there is an opportunity to incorporate Ngāi Tahu history and values into the development or redevelopment of these areas. The plan provisions focus on the design of larger scale public or community buildings and facilities or subdivisions. Ngā wai are water bodies, including wetlands, tupuna (springs) and coastal waters which are significant areas of mahinga kai or other customary use for Ngāi Tahu. These areas include Te Tai o Mahaanui the coastal area of Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula and Wairewa/Lake Forsyth both areas listed as areas of statutory acknowledgement in the Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement ct 1998 (see Chapter 1, Introduction, section 3.2). Some areas may be shown as ngā tūranga tūpuna and include wāhi tapu/wāhi taonga or ngā wai sites within them. In that case both sets of provisions apply to the land subject to dual classifications and an activity takes its status from the more stringent rules. Wāhi tapu/wāhi taonga, Ngā tūranga tūpuna, Ngā wai and Nga tapuae, are all sites of Ngāi Tahu cultural significance FS Radford Oppose Chapter 9 Decision sought: The amendments sought in particular as they 5

6 Page 6 of 33 Family FS Canterbury Regional Council Chapter FS Chorus Oppose Chapter FS CER Chapter 9 Decision Sought R apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including CRC considers that is it useful to provide guidance for plan users as to the role that Ngāi Tahu - as tangata whenua in the Canterbury Region - has in providing for the preservation and enhancement of the natural environment. Protection from "inappropriate disturbance, damage or destruction" and "ensure activities adjoining these sites do not affect them" is uncertain and may be unreasonably restrictive. The mapped sites of significance (including Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga) traverse large geographic areas (in some cases, with a radius kilometres wide) without any specific details or location of the site of Wāhi Tapu / Wāhi Taonga, meaning that the scale of the assessment (including consultation with Runanga) may be excessive compared with the scale and nature of the proposed activity. The intent of section 9 X Ngāi Tahu Values and the Natural Environment is understood and supported. However, there is potential for this addition to the Replacement Plan to create Plan clarity and implementation issues because the proposed insertion addresses values that are already covered by

7 Page 7 of FS Vodafone New Zealand Limited FS Enable Networks Oppose Chapter 9 Oppose Chapter FS Spark Oppose Chapter FS Two Degrees Oppose Chapter 9 Decision Sought R ccept submission subject to amendments being made to address overlaps with other sections of Proposal 9 and/or the insertion of cross referencing to address this issue. Protection from inappropriate disturbance, damage or destruction" and "ensure activities adjoining these sites do not affect them" is uncertain and may be unreasonably restrictive. The mapped sites of significance (including Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga) traverse large geographic areas (in some cases, with a radius kilometres wide) without any specific details or location of the site of Wāhi Tapu / Wāhi Taonga, meaning that the scale of the assessment (including consultation with Runanga) may be excessive compared with the scale and nature of the proposed activity. Protection from "inappropriate disturbance, damage or destruction" and "ensure activities adjoining these sites do not affect them" is uncertain and may be unreasonably restrictive. The mapped sites of significance (including Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga) traverse large geographic areas (in some cases, with a radius kilometres wide) without any specific details or location of the site of Wāhi Taup/Wāhi Taonga, meaning that the scale of the assessment (including consultation with Runanga) may be excessive compared with the scale and nature of the proposed activity. Protection from "inappropriate disturbance, damage or destruction" and "ensure activities adjoining these sites do not affect them" is uncertain and may be unreasonably restrictive. The mapped sites of significance (including Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga) traverse large geographic areas (in some cases, with a radius kilometres wide) without any specific details or location of the site of Wāhi Taup/Wāhi Taonga, meaning that the scale of the assessment (including consultation with Runanga) may be excessive compared with the scale and nature of the proposed activity. Protection from inappropriate disturbance, damage or destruction" and "ensure activities adjoining these sites do not affect them" is uncertain and may be unreasonably restrictive. The mapped sites of significance (including Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga) traverse large geographic areas (in some cases, with a radius kilometres 7

8 Page 8 of FS FS FS Kirsty Inwood Ray Wood ndrew MacKay FS Foxton Properties Ltd and Five Blend Holdings Ltd Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu Oppose Chapter 9 Oppose Chapter 9 Not Stated Chapter 9 Decision Sought R wide) without any specific details or location of the site of Wāhi Tapu/Wāhi Taonga, meaning that the scale of the assessment (including consultation with Runanga) may be excessive compared with the scale and nature of the proposed activity. Decision sought: The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s32, the Order In Council, and the prdp strategic objectives, including The amendments as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are unreasonable given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business area in the LURP and chapter 6 of the RPS; and is zoned industrial General (part). The only permitted activities are earthworks or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the RM 1991, including s32, the Order In Council, and the prdp strategic objectives, including dd a new rules section: 8

9 Page 9 of 33 Decision Sought R 9.X.2 Rules for reas and Sites of Ngāi Tahu Significance Permitted ctivities - Wāhi Tapu/Wāhi Taonga ctivity Within any site listed in Schedule X and shown on the planning maps as a wāhi tapu/wāhi taonga the following activities are permitted activities provided they comply with the activity specific standards: Earthworks Fencing Removing any artefact or disturbing any archaeological site Planting or removal of vegetation ny activity undertaken within a papakainga zone ctivity Specific Standards i. ny earthworks shall be limited to disturbance of land over an area and to a depth to which it has been previously disturbed for cultivation. ii. ny fencing shall be limited to fencing around a wāhi tapu/wāhi taonga site for the purposes of protecting the site and is undertaken by the relevant runanga or their authorized agent. iii. The removal of any structure or artefact or the disturbance of any archaeological site is for the purposes of research, or preservation or protection of the artefact or site; and shall be undertaken be the relevant runanga or 9

10 Page 10 of 33 Decision Sought R their authorized agent. iv. The removal of any indigenous vegetation is limited to that allowed by permitted activity Rule P1 to P3* or customary use authorised by the relevant runanga. v. The activity in the Papakainga Zone is provided for within an approved outline development plan for the area and is undertaken in accordance with that plan. *These numbers may need to be updated as a consequential amendment of submissions accepted. Restricted Discretionary ctivities Wāhi Tapu/Wāhi Taonga ctivity Within any site listed in Schedule X and shown on the planning maps as wāhi tapu/wāhi taonga the following activities are The Council s discretion shall be limited to all of the following matters: i. The effects of the proposed activity on the wāhi tapu/wāhi taonga site and the appropriateness of 10

11 Page 11 of 33 Decision Sought R restricted discretionary activities: i. Bores and other earthworks that do not comply with the standards for a permitted activity. ii. Erecting any building or structure that does not comply with the standards for a permitted activity. iii. Removing any artefact or disturbing any archaeological site that does not comply with the standards for a permitted activity. iv. Planting or removing vegetation which does not comply with the standards for a permitted activity. v. Land uses in Papakainga zones which do not comply with the standards for a permitted activity. ii. any mitigation measures; and ppropriate conditions on any resource consent granted including the need for a cultural monitor on-site. ny application for resource consent made under this rule shall be served on the 11

12 Page 12 of 33 Decision Sought R relevant runanga as an affected party. Ngā Tūranga Tūpuna - Restricted Discretionary ctivities ctivity Within any area listed in Schedule X and shown on the planning maps as ngā tūranga tūpuna the following activities are restricted discretionary activities: i. Drilling bores or other earthworks that disturb soil to a depth not previously disturbed by cultivation or building/structure foundations. ii. Earthworks involving the drainage, alteration or realignment of wetlands, tupuna (springs), rivers or other water bodies. iii. The erection of any The Council s discretion shall be limited to all of the following matters: a. Conditions for the appropriate management of any site of historic Ngāi Tahu occupation disturbed by earthworks including accidental discovery protocol conditions and the use of a cultural monitor on-site during earthworks. b. The design or layout of any building or subdivision and associated landscaping or planting to reflect the Ngāi Tahu association with the area including any matters identified in a Impact ssessment or through other forms of consultation. 12

13 Page 13 of 33 Decision Sought R public or community building or facility; iv. The subdivision of land which creates more than 3 lots whether staged or not or which requires the creation of one or more access roads; v. The erection of any commercial or industrial building which is more than 500m 2 in gross floor area; vi. The removal of indigenous vegetatio n other than that associated with customary harvest of taonga species, the maintenance of amenity plantings or removal ancillary to livestock grazing. c. The effect of removing indigenous vegetation on mahinga kai and other customary uses and the effects of any mitigation measures including new plantings and improved access for customary use. d. The effects of any alteration to or realignment of water bodies or other natural features, including the extent to which the realignment of any water body reflects the original position of the water course and its natural character. e. The provision of information on Ngāi Tahu history and association with the area. ny application for resource consent made under this rule shall be served on the relevant runanga as an affected party. Ngā Wai - Restricted Discretionary ctivities 13

14 Page 14 of 33 Decision Sought R ctivity Within any area listed in Schedule X and shown on the planning maps as ngā wai the following activities are restricted discretionary activities: 1. Earthworks within 30m of the water body or earthworks associated with the drainage, alteration or realignment of wetlands, tupuna (springs), rivers or other water bodies. 2. The removal of indigenous vegetation other than that associated with customary harvest of taonga species, the maintenance of amenity plantings or removal ancillary to livestock grazing. 3. The erection of buildings and structures within 30m of a ngā wai site. 4. ny structure or device fixed in, on or over the surface of any water The Council s discretion shall be limited to all of the following matters: i. Conditions for the appropriate manageme nt of any archaeological site disturbed by earthworks including accidental discovery protocol conditions and the use of a cultural monitor on-site. ii. The effect of removing indigenous vegetation on mahinga kai and other customary uses and the benefits of any mitigation measures including new plantings and improved access for customary use. iii. The effects of any building, structure or device on the natural character of the site and its margins, cultural values and access to the site and mahinga kai. iv. The effects of any alteration to or realignment of water bodies, including the extent to which any 14

15 Page 15 of 33 Decision Sought R body ny application for resource consent made under this rule shall be served on the relevant runanga as an affected party. changes reflect the original position of the water course and its natural character. v. The provision of information on Ngāi Tahu use of and association with ngā wai FS Radford Family FS FS FS FS Oppose Chapter 9 Chorus Oppose Chapter 9 The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including The mapped sites of significance (including Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga) traverse large geographic areas. The rules do not provide for minor activities (such as those listed in Chapters 11 and 13 related to Utilities) that would have very little impact, particularly when compared to cultivation, fencing or vegetation removal. In addition, a rule cannot specify that an application much be served on a particular party. 15

16 Page 16 of FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS FS Vodafone New Zealand Limited Enable Networks Ltd Spark New Zealand Trading Limited Two Degrees Mobile Limited Kirsty Inwood Ray Wood ndrew MacKay Oppose Chapter 9 Oppose Chapter 9 Oppose Chapter 9 Oppose Chapter 9 Oppose Chapter 9 Decision Sought R The mapped sites of significance (including Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga) traverse large geographic areas. The rules do not provide for minor activities (such as those listed in Chapters 11 and 13 related to Utilities) that would have very little impact, particularly when compared to cultivation, fencing or vegetation removal. In addition, a rule cannot specify that an application must be served on a particular party. The mapped sites of significance (including Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga) traverse large geographic areas. The rules do not provide for minor activities (such as those listed in Chapters 11 and 13 related to Utilities) that would have very little impact, particularly when compared to cultivation, fencing or vegetation removal. In addition, a rule cannot specify that an application must be served on a particular party. The mapped sites of significance (including Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga) traverse large geographic areas. The rules do not provide for minor activities (such as those listed in Chapters 11 and 13 related to Utilities) that would have very little impact, particularly when compared to cultivation, fencing or vegetation removal. In addition, a rule cannot specify that an application must be served on a particular party. The mapped sites of significance (including Wāhi Tapu and Wāhi Taonga) traverse large geographic areas. The rules do not provide for minor activities (such as those listed in Chapters 11 and 13 related to Utilities) that would have very little impact, particularly when compared to cultivation, fencing or vegetation removal. In addition, a rule cannot specify that an application must be served on a particular party. The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land 16

17 Page 17 of FS Foxton Properties Ltd and Five Blend Holdings Ltd Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu FS Radford Family Oppose Chapter 9 mend Chapter 9 Oppose Chapter 9 Decision Sought R cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s32, the Order In Council, and the prdp strategic objectives, including The amendments as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are unreasonable given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business area in the LURP and chapter 6 of the RPS; and is zoned industrial General (part). The only permitted activities are earthworks or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the RM 1991, including s32, the Order In Council, and the prdp strategic objectives, including dd the attached schedule of sites and areas of Wāhi Taonga, Ngā Tūranga Tūpuna, Ngā Wai and Nga Tapuae to the plan, and clearly identify these sites as sites of Ngāi Tahu cultural significance. The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings 17

18 Page 18 of FS FS FS Kirsty Inwood Ray Wood ndrew MacKay FS Foxton Properties Ltd and Five Blend Holdings Ltd Oppose Chapter 9 Oppose Chapter 9 Decision Sought R are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including The amendments as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are unreasonable given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business area in the LURP and chapter 6 of the RPS; and is zoned industrial General (part). The only permitted activities are earthworks or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. 18

19 Page 19 of FS Mr Michael Bayley Oppose Chapter 9 Decision Sought R The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the RM 1991, including s32, the Order In Council, and the prdp strategic objectives, including The impact of the scheduling of Kaitorete Spit as sought are unknown and uncertain from the proposals before the Panel. Recognition of the relationship of Ngāi Tahu with Kaitorete Spit is not opposed, however the blanket treatment of the Spit without any consultation seems heavy handed and could unnecessarily impact on the further submitter's farming operation. Oppose the scheduling of all Kaitorete Spit as a Wāhi Tapu/Wāhi Taonga (including silent files) and Ngā Tūranga Tūpuna site: ID Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu FS Radford Family mend Oppose Planning Maps Planning Maps The impact of the scheduling of Kaitorete Spit as sought are unknown and uncertain from the proposals before the Panel. Recognition of the relationship of Ngāi Tahu with Kaitorete Spit is not opposed, however the blanket treatment of the Spit without any consultation seems heavy handed and could unnecessarily impact on the further submitter's farming operation. mend the Planning Maps to include the attached maps showing identified sites or areas: Wāhi Taonga, Ngā Tūranga Tūpuna and Ngā Wai, and identify these sites as sites of Ngāi Tahu cultural significance. The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are 19

20 Page 20 of FS FS FS Kirsty Inwood Ray Wood ndrew MacKay FS Foxton Properties Ltd and Five Blend Holdings Ltd Oppose Oppose Planning Maps Planning Maps Decision Sought R addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including The amendments as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are unreasonable given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business area in the LURP and chapter 6 of the RPS; and is zoned industrial General (part). The only permitted activities are earthworks or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the RM 1991, including s32, the Order In Council, and the prdp strategic objectives, including

21 Page 21 of Christchurch City Council mend Chapter 9 Decision Sought R mend b. any site or area vested in the ownership of Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu under the Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement ct 1998; c. land which is held as Maori land or Maori reserve land; d. any site protected in a national water conservation order as being outstanding in its cultural significance to Ngāi Tahu; or e. any other site identified in the District Plan or regional plan or shown on the planning maps of the District Plan or regional plan as being a culturally significant landscape, a site of wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga, or a site which the Council holds information on as being a silent file. R Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu mend Objective - Outstanding Natural Features and Landscapes, Significant Features and Landscapes and Natural Character in the Coastal Environment Note: point coded to Chapter 9 general but relates to definition of Site of Ngāi Tahu cultural significance. dd a new objective: The cultural significance of Te Tai o Mahaanui, Wairewa and the coastal environment as a whole to Ngāi Tahu is recognised and Ngāi Tahu are able to exercise kaitiakitanga and undertake customary uses in accordance with tikanga, within the coastal environment. *Note - this objective has been added to Chapter 9.5, as objective significance of Te Tai o Mahaanui and the Coastal Environment to Ngāi Tahu Summit Road mend It is noted that Policy future work on Landscapes * 21

22 Page 22 of 33 Protection uthority Carter Group Limited (CGL) karoa Civic Trust Historic Places Canterbury (HPC) Federated Farmers of New Zealand Future work on landscapes mend Future Work on Landscapes mend Future Work on Landscapes mend Future Work on Landscapes Future Work on Landscapes Decision Sought R sets out an intent to work with Ngāi Tahu to develop a methodology for assessing cultural landscapes for future inclusion in the District Plan. The uthority takes this opportunity to note it wishes to be included in this future work programme, both as a s.8 affected uthority, and because the Summit Road has significant cultural landscape values developed over the last 150 years. mend to clarify that no new areas will be added to the list of significant landscapes. F Retain policies in mend with the addition of a new subsection (b): b) work with New Zealand, the New Zealand rchaeological ssociation, the Institute of Landscape architects and other relevant stakeholder groups to develop a methodology, assess and identify culturally significant landscapes for inclusion in the District Plan with objectives, policies and rules as required. in part, but Federated Farmers wishes to be part of this process, including development of any methodology. Some of this may affect private property and it is unhelpful to presenting new proposals for cultural overlays late in the process. R Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu FS Radford Family Insert requirement to consult with Federated Farmers at an early stage, including methodology development. mend s a consequence of accepting this submission delete Rules (p.48) and (p.52), and the reference to silent files in Rule (p.25); and amend the references to silent files in other parts of the plan to sites of Ngāi Tahu cultural significance as described in this submission by Te Runanga/nga runanga. Oppose The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the 22

23 Page 23 of 33 Decision Sought R area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including FS FS FS Kirsty Inwood Ray Wood ndrew MacKay Oppose The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including 23

24 Page 24 of Peterborough Village Incorporated Society Carter Group Limited (CGL) karoa Civic Trust Ian & Lynne Lochhead NZ Pouhere Taonga Policy - Protection of Sites of Ngāi Tahu Significance mend Policy - Protection of Sites of Ngāi Tahu Significance Policy - Protection of Sites of Ngāi Tahu Significance Policy - Protection of Sites of Ngāi Tahu Significance mend Policy - Protection of Sites of Ngāi Tahu Decision Sought R s32, the Order In Council, and the prdp strategic objectives, including s a traditional base for Tuatahi, and involving Puāri Pā, we support recognition and protection of Wāhi Tapu within the village area. mend to confirm that no new sites of significance will be included in the plan. Retain the policies in Our submission is in support of the Historic provisions as a whole contained in sections through dopt Policy New Zealand seeks that any currently available information for these sites should be scheduled in the Plan. Oruaka (7671) Takapuneke (7521) R 24

25 Page 25 of Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu FS Radford Family Significance mend Policy - Protection of Sites of Ngāi Tahu Significance Oppose Policy - Protection of Sites of Ngāi Tahu Significance FS Kirsty Inwood Oppose Policy - Decision Sought R Omaru puna Wai (7601) Onawe pa (7643) Oteauheke (9507) PuariPa Urupa (7607) Tautahi Pa (7715) Tautahi Rua Koiwi (7716) Te Urupao Kati Mamoe ki Onuku (9554) Tuhiraki (7776) s a consequence of accepting this submission amend Policy to provide for any further amendment as necessary. The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the 25

26 Page 26 of 33 FS FS Ray Wood ndrew MacKay Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu FS Radford Family Protection of Sites of Ngāi Tahu Significance mend ctivity Status Tables Oppose ctivity Status Tables Decision Sought R area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s32, the Order In Council, and the prdp strategic objectives, including s a consequence of accepting this submission delete Rules (p.48) and (p.52), and the reference to silent files in Rule (p.25); and amend the references to silent files in other parts of the plan to sites of Ngāi Tahu cultural significance as described in this submission by Te Runanga/nga runanga. The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on 26

27 Page 27 of FS FS FS Kirsty Inwood Ray Wood ndrew MacKay Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu FS Radford Family Oppose ctivity Status Tables mend Matters of Discretion - Historic Oppose Matters of Discretion - Decision Sought R Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including Request a new rule that any earthworks involving the disturbance of ground to depths that have not been previously disturbed by cultivation or building to be a restricted discretionary activity. The consent will not be publicly notified but will require service on the relevant runanga. The consent authority s discretion is restricted to the imposition of conditions to ensure the appropriate management of any sites of Ngāi Tahu occupation which are discovered or disturbed, including the use of accidental discovery protocol conditions, cultural monitors or other conditions as appropriate. The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land 27

28 Page 28 of FS FS FS Kirsty Inwood Ray Wood ndrew MacKay Te Runanga o Ngāi Tahu Historic Oppose Matters of Discretion - Historic mend Silent File Decision Sought R Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including The amendments sought in particular as they apply to North Belfast Site 83/1 are impractical and unreasonable especially given the area is identified as a priority greenfield business areas in the Land Use Recovery Plan and Chapter 6 of the Regional Policy Statement; and is zoned Industrial General (part) and for residential purposes part. The only permitted activities are earthworks which create no greater disturbance than previous land cultivation, fencing where it protects a Wāhi tapu or wāhi taonga site area or planting or removal of vegetation (subject to limits). ll buildings are restricted discretionary. ll consents are to be served on the runanga as an affected party. Buildings and earthworks within 30m of a waterbody are restricted discretionary. Similar concerns are addressed and reasons for the same outlined in the submissions and further submissions filed on behalf of the Radford Family on Stages 1 and 2 of the Proposed Replacement District Plan. The amended provisions sought are inconsistent with the Resource Management ct 1991, including s 32, the Order in Council, and the PCRDP strategic objectives, including s a consequence of accepting this submission delete Rules (p.48) and (p.52), and the reference to silent files in 28