CONTENTS. BANDIRMA-3 24 MW Wind Power Plant Gold Standard Passport. A. Project Title. B. Project Description. C. Proof of Project Eligibility

Transcription

1 BANDIRMA-3 24 MW Wind Power Plant Gold Standard Passport CONTENTS A. Project Title B. Project Description C. Proof of Project Eligibility D. Unique Project Identification E. Outcome Stakeholders Consultation Process F. Outcome Sustainability Assessment G. Sustainability Monitoring Plan H. Additionality and Conservativeness Deviations Annex 1 ODA Declaration Annex 2 SFR Meeting Participation List Annex 3 Summary of Feedback Forms

2 SECTION A. Project Title BANDIRMA-3 24 MW Wind Power Plant Version:0405 Date:28/1012/20101 SECTION B. Project description ASMAKİNSAN Temiz Enerji Elektrik Üretim Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş. is developing / investing wind farm projects in Turkey, one of the principal forms of energy generation from renewable energy. Asmakinsan realizes self-developed projects within a production company model in accordance with market conditions. Such projects will gap some of the national energy deficit, will contribute the development of local industries as it will allow the use of cheaper energy for industrialists and gain advantage in a competitive environment. In this scope, Asmakinsan plans to install 10 x 2.5 MW Wind Turbines at the Southwest of Bandırma town near Bezirci and Çarıkköy in the province of Balıkesir with the purpose of contributing to national economy and providing a portion of growing electricity demand. Total installed power of the facility will be MW. ( with 96% efficiency ) License application for the Wind Energy Power Plant was made to the Energy Market Regulatory Authority and the Production License was awarded in accordance with the Electricity Market Law (No: 4628) for a period of 49 years by the decision numbered EU/1546-3/1129 on March 25th, 2008 (see Annex 6). The project consists of 80 meter high wind turbines, each 2.5 MW and a 154 kv switchyard. The annual projected energy of 99,000,000 kwh will be transferred to the interconnected grid by a power transmission line from the project switchyard to TEİAŞ Gönen TM substation. The project activity will generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions by avoiding CO 2 emissions from electricity generation by fossil fuel power plants connected to Turkish National Power Grid. The average annual generated energy of 99 GWh, will be able to deliver a reduction in emissions of around 59,796 tco2e (tons of carbon dioxide equivalent) per annum. SECTION C. Proof of project eligibility C.1. Scale of the Project Project Type Large Small 2

3 C.2. Host Country Host country Turkey has not yet ratified Kyoto Protocol and does not have cap on GHGs. C.3. Project Type Project type Yes No Does your project activity classify as a Renewable Energy project? Does your project activity classify as an End-use Energy Efficiency Improvement project? Project activity involves construction of a 2425 MW capacity wind power plant for electricity generation. Project category is included in the sectoral scope 1 Energy Industry Renewable Sources according to the UNFCCC definition. Pre Announcement Yes No Was your project previously announced? 3

4 Carbon credit has been taken into account by project investors in making the project decision to proceed. Carbon income was also taken into account by the financier banks as an integral part of their decision to provide loans to fund the project. C.4. Greenhouse gas Greenhouse Gas Carbon dioxide Methane Nitrous oxide C.5. Project Registration Type Project Registration Type Regular Pre-feasibility assessment Retro-active projects (T.2.5.1) Preliminary evaluation (T.2.5.2) Rejected UNFCCC (T2.5.3) by SECTION D. Unique project identification D.1. GPS-coordinates of project location Turbine No. Turbine coordinates Turbine No. Turbine coordinates Easting Northing Easting Northing T1 E N T6 E N T2 E N T7 E N T3 E N T8 E N T4 E N T9 E N

5 T5 E N T10 E N Table 1. Turbine Coordinates Bandırma-3 WPP project is located at the Southwest of Bandırma town near Bezirci and Çarikköy villages Balıkesir-Turkey. D.2. Map Project Site Figure 1. Bandırma-3 WPP Project Site SECTION E. Outcome stakeholder consultation process E.1. Assessment of stakeholder comments The initial stakeholder meeting was held on Tuesday, 14 th of April, 2009 in Çarık Village, Bandırma District at 14:15. 5

6 Overall stakeholders comments were in favour of the Project and positive. The main issues raised by stakeholder participants during the meeting concerned: Noise during the operation due to the turbine blades. Wild animal migration (also flight path of birds) due to implementation processes. Vegetation around the location could be affected by (but only during the construction phase) the civil rehabilitation. Stakeholder Comment Assessment Response to comment Noise during operation Taken into account Wind turbines produce low frequency noises; the impact is thus considered limited. Noise level changes much based on wind speed, at high wind speeds one can hear a cleaving sound. The wind technology has advanced so that generally, the noise is about 40 db in a distance of 150m -200m from a wind farm. There is a danger that animals and birds could be affected Taken into account When preparing the EIA report, the project area was carefully examined by the project developer in terms of ecological impacts. Since the project is not on the migration route of birds, no significant effect is expected. Precautions should be taken to prevent negative effects on regional agriculture, vegetation Question on technical maintenance plan for wind farm (related to disposing of waste oil) Taken into account Taken into account Wind farm layout has been designed very carefully with respect to the issue of agriculture. No grassland nor agricultural land will be affected by the project Safety precautions regarding the operation will be performed by experts better in order to maintain performance of the turbines. Disposal of waste oil/material wil lbe carried out according to local regulations. All comments from stakeholders are taken into account and promptly and satisfactorily responded to. 6

7 E.2. Stakeholder Feedback Round Stakeholder feedback round (SFR) has been organized as a physical meeting according to GS requirements on 21 st of October, 2009 in Bezirci Village. All the identified stakeholders have been invited to SFR through invitation letters, messages, through village heads and newspaper ad published in Ilk Haber newspaper on 16/10/2009. Also, announcements have been made at the meeting date using village speaker system. Figure 2. Bandırma-3 WPP SFR Newspaper Add 45 stakeholders have participated in the meeting including Deputy Mayor of Edincik, EIA Planning Department Manager of Balıkesir, Village heads and local representatives of public institutions. 7

8 After the opening speech, brief introduction about the project has been given by Mr. Durali Ferik (Asmakinsan). Evren Kaleli (GTE) has explained the carbon certification process, summarized the comments of the first meeting and the results of SD matrix, measurements taken after the first meeting and requested to fill the forms and send feedback about the project within 60 days. Major issues raised in the LSC meetings have been overviewed and again discussed together with the participants. Mr. Durali Ferik has also given brief information about their contributions to the villages in the project region. Summary of the meeting minutes is given below; Gunnur Berk (EIA Planning Department Manager of Balıkesir Provincial Department of Environment and Forestry): Thank you for all this constructive information but I also would like to remind you that as a department we should be informed about the construction works periodically. Evren Kaleli: Bezirci Village head, Abdullah Dedeakay told us the concern about the climate change in the project region. Some locals think that clouds will change place during the operation due to turbine blades and this will decrease the amount of rainfall in the area. The heights of the turbines are only 80 meters and so, it is improbable to agree with this concern. In this region, there are some other wind power plants which already have been commissioned, also a lot of countries are now using this technology and personally I did not know of any evidence about this issue. Raif Sevinç (Deputy Mayor of Edincik): One month before, a wind power plant has been commissioned in our district. Since a part of the project is located in a pasture area, in early days, local community, especially the people dealing with stock breeding had some worries about depasturing their animals. But now they understand that this does not affect their feeding facilities. The animals can depasture without any problem or any danger inside the plant. Building fences around the turbines could be enough as a pre-caution. Durali Ferik : I totally agree with you. We will build fences around the turbines and also for the switchyard. Raif Sevinç (Deputy Mayor of Edincik) : By this way, I would like to mention on behalf of the Mayor of Edincik that we are very pleased to give all our support to the companies like you whose activities are known to be environmentally-conscious. And we are ready to do our full share of work to encourage this kind of investments in our region. Local participant: Will you also keep on employing local people during the operation period? 8

9 Durali Ferik : Our aim is to employ as much local people as we can. But we may have to look for some other qualified staff required by the standards of Turkish Ministery of Energy. Finally, Evren Kaleli has asked participants to fill the Sustainable Development Evaluation Chart together and fill the evaluation forms now or within 60 days so that any additional comments can be processed. Stakeholders have also been invited for site visit as requested by the GS toolkit. However, since the plant facilities are closed to the villages and they already see the site continuously, they though that it is not necessary to visit the site as it was the harvesting season in the region. Contact info of GTE and ASMAKİNSAN has been given again and the meeting has been closed. Participation List and SFR Feedback Forms are been given in Annex 2 and 3. According to the comments raised during meeting, in general local people were happy to get a chance for feedback. Recruiting as much local people as possible during the operation period was the only request stressed by the participants. The comments have been responded positively by the project owner. Details of the comments and responses are below. Durali Ferik has also indicated that stakeholders can reach them anytime for any problem about the project so that they can compensate immediately. Comment Sending information periodically to the EIA Planning Department of Balıkesir Provincial Department of Environment and Forestry Building fences around the turbines as a pre-caution during the operation period Employing local people during the operation period. Project Owner s Response Taken into account. We will be more sensitive about this issue at the next sections of the construction works. Agreed. We will also build fences around the switchyard. We will recruit as much local people as we can for our windfarm. Also current job applications show that it won t be difficult to find qualified staff according to the required standards of Turkish Ministry of Energy. SD matrix has been explained and a copy has been distributed to the participants during the meeting. They have also been attached to the invitation letters sent by mail. During the last section of the meeting, each indicator was discussed together with the participants in order to find out any possible negative comments. As a result, no negative comments were raised by the participants for any indicator items. No feedback has been provided by mail or fax from the participants or invitees. 9

10 Indicator Mitigation measure Chosen parameter and explanation Air quality Water quality and quantity SOx and NOx emission Amount of water available for irrigation Score given by stakeholders Soil condition Soil Pollution and/or Erosion Other pollutants Noise Biodiversity Quality of employment Livelihood of the poor Impact on protected species Job Safety and Working Conditions Impact on living conditions Access to affordable and clean energy services Human and institutional capacity Quantitative employment and income generation Balance of payments and investment Technology transfer and technological self-reliance Impact on Reliable energy services Number of certificates issued/trainings provided Number of locally recruited staff in the power plant. Fossil fuel import avoided Expenditures for equipments

11 Figure 3. SFR Meeting 11

12 12

13 SECTION F. Outcome Sustainability assessment F.1. Do no harm Assessment 13

14 Project activities have been analyzed against questions in table 2.6 and in annex H of GS toolkit. Project is not complicit in corruption and fully respects human rights. Also, there exist no identified species under protection in the project area that will be affected negatively by the project. Project is a wind power project and does not involve use or generation of any hazardous waste. All of the project activity is implemented considering related environmental and safety precautions. Based on the analysis, only relevant areas related to project activity are determined as labour standards and environmental protection which are assessed as given in table below. Safeguarding principles 1. The Project respects internationally proclaimed human rights including dignity, cultural property and uniqueness of indigenous people. The Project is not complicity in Human Rights abuses. 2. The Project does not involve and is not complicit in involuntary resettlement Description of relevance to my project Assessment of my project risks breaching it (low/medium/high) Mitigation measure Human Rights Not Relevant. Low No mitigation Project activities measure is are not expected required. to cause any human rights abuse. Turkey has ratified European Convention on Human Right in 10/03/ Project does not Low No mitigation involve any measure is resettlement required for this indicator. Project site has been rented from the project owner for 49 years by the investor company. The rental agreement and registry for 1 (Accessed on 31/08/2009) 14

15 Safeguarding principles 3. The project does not involve and is not complicit in the alteration, damage or removal of any critical cultural heritage. 4. The project respects the employees freedom of association and their right to collective bargaining and is not complicit in restrictions of these freedoms and rights. 5. The project does not involve and is not complicit in any form of forced or compulsory labour 6. The project does not employ and is not complicit in any form of Description of relevance to my project Project does not have any impact on cultural heritage as given in Pre-EIA page... Assessment of my project risks breaching it (low/medium/high) Low Labor Standards Not Relevant. Turkey has ratified ILO 87 and 98 conventions.all staff recruited are employed according to the national legislations. 4 Not Relevant. Turkey has ratified ILO convention 29 and 105 on forced and compulsory labour 43. Not Relevant. Turkey is a party of IPEC* since Mitigation measure ownership is given in EIA as annex 2 Project site is a private land and does not include any critical habitat or protected site according to national and international regulations. 3 Low No mitigation action is required. Low Low No mitigation action is required. No mitigation action is required. Biçimlendir 2 Pre-EIA Report Section 2.a 3 Pre-EIA Report Section 2.b.1, 2.b.2 and 2.b

16 Safeguarding principles child labour. 7. The project does not involve and is not complicit in any form of discrimination based on gender, race, religion, sexual orientation or any other basis. 8. The project provides workers with a safe and healthy work environment and is not complicit in exposing workers to unsafe or unhealthy work environment. 9. The project takes a precautionary approach in regard to environmental challenges and is not complicit in practices contrary to the precautionary principle. 10. The project does not involve and is not complicit in significant conversion or degradation of critical natural habitats, including those that are (a) legally protected, (b) officially Description of relevance to my project 1992 and ratified ILO convention 138 and 182. Not Relevant. Turkey has ratified ILO convention 100 and 111 and discrimination based on gender is illegal in Turkey. Work Safety&Risk of accidents Assessment of my project risks breaching it (low/medium/high) Low Low Environmental Protection Wind power Low plants have minimum impact on environment. There exist no protected (or proposed to be protected) or critical habitat within the Low Mitigation measure No mitigation action is required. Labours will trained considering the requirements of their responsibility in the plant. The plant will be in compliance with relevant regulations for H&S This is approved in preliminary EIA report. Company will comply with all national regulations and take all precautions stated 16

17 Safeguarding principles proposed for protection, (c) identified by authoritative sources for their high conservation value, or (d) recognized as protected by traditional local communities. 11. The project does not involve and is not complicit in corruption. Description of relevance to my project project boundary as stated in Pre- EIA page. Anti-Corruption Not relevant. Low Turkey has ratified several conventions on bribery and corruption including OECD and UN conventions 6. Assessment of my project risks breaching it (low/medium/high) Mitigation measure in the Pre-EIA and legislations. 5 No mitigation action is required. 5 Pre-EIA Report, section 2.b.1, 2.b.2 and 2.b

18 F.2. Sustainable Development matrix Indicator Air quality Water quality and quantity Soil condition Mitigation measure Mitigation measure is not required for this indicator Waste water will be collected in cesspool and dumped to the nearest canalization system as required by relevant regulations. Top layer of the soil will be stored and used to cover project site after project Relevance to achieving MDG MDG target 7.A (Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programs and reverse the loss of environmental resources) and 7.B (7.2 CO2 emissions, total, per capita) - - Chosen parameter and explanation Parameter: SO 2 and NOx emission. Emissions of SO 2 and NOx will be reduced in parallel to CO 2 due to avoiding fossil fuel combustion. Parameter: Amount of water used & sewage Project does not need any process water. Only use of water will be for domestic purposes which will be disposed to local sewage system and not expected to affect the quality of water in the project boundaries. Parameter: Amount of land used for project activities. Project will use less than 2000 square meter of land for Preliminary score

19 construction is completed so that area used for project activity will be minimized. 7 turbines and switchgear station. Compared to baseline scenario, project will have no change on erosion risk. Other pollutants Biodiversity No mitigation measure is required since there exist no settlement close to project site and since noise during construction and operation will be much lower than allowed limits. No mitigation action is required since project does not have any impact on forests, birds or natural habitat. - - Parameter: Noise level and dust during construction and operation Project will not create any other pollutant. Noise level and dust will be lower than allowed limits as calculated in the Preliminary EIA Report. Parameter: Impact on bird population& vegetation on project site. The project is located on neither forestland nor migration route for birds. Interaction with birds will be monitored by project owner Pre-EIA REport 19

20 Quality of employment Staff will be trained for the positions created during construction& operation phases. All Heath and Safety measurements will be applied according to local regulations. MDG Target 1.B (Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all, including women and young people), 1.4 (1.4 Growth rate of GDP per person employed) Parameter: Number of certificates issued/trainings provided 0 Livelihood of the poor No mitigation action is required since local people will naturally have priority in recruitment process due to logistic purposes also MDG Target 1.A (Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than one dollar a day) and 1.B (Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all, including women and young people), 1.4 (1.4 Growth rate of GDP per person employed ) Parameter: Number of locally recruited staff in the power plant. Project will increase income of local people compared to baseline scenario through locally recruited staff and supply of plant needs from region 0 Access to affordable and clean energy services No mitigation action is required for this indicator. - Parameter: Fossil fuel replaced Project will decrease dependency on import fossil fuels (Natural gas, Coal and 0 20

21 Human and institutional capacity No mitigation measure is required for this parameter. - petroleum) compared to baseline scenario Parameter: Change in income 0 Quantitative employment and income generation Balance of payments and investment Mitigation measure is not required for this indicator. Mitigation measure is not required for this indicator. MDG target 1.B (Achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all, including women and young people) 1.4 Growth rate of GDP per person employed 1.5 Employment-topopulation ratio 1.6 Proportion of employed people living below $1 (PPP) per day 1.7 Proportion of ownaccount and contributing family workers in total employment MDG Target 8.D (Deal comprehensively with the debt problems of developing countries through national and international measures in order to make debt sustainable in the Parameter: Payment made to staff. Project will create new job opportunities compared to baseline scenario. Parameter: Currency saving due to avoided fuel import. Project will replace fossil fuel import for electricity generation and result in net

22 Technology transfer and technological self-reliance Mitigation measure is not required for this indicator. long term) MDG target 8.F (In cooperation with the private sector, make available the benefits of new technologies, especially information and communications) foreign currency saving. Parameter: Expenditures for equipments Project will enable latest technology transfer to Turkey and influence development of local suppliers and know-how in the country + Justification choices, data source and provision of references Air quality Water quality and quantity Soil condition To generate electricity by wind power will reduce the amount of CO2 released to the air in Turkey. (TEIAS Turkish Electricity Transmission Corp- Electricity Capacity Projection Report ( ) No negative or significantly positive impact of project is identified. Project does not use any water for electricity generation. Water demand for domestic use and during construction stage will be provided through tanks. Waste water will from domestic usage will be collected in cesspool and transported to appropriate places determined by local authorities by sewage trucks. (Source: Bandirma-3 WPP Preliminary EIA Report-page22) No negative or significantly positive impact of project is identified. About 2,184 m 3 aggregates will be obtained from excavation. This will be used in construction, landscaping and rehabilitation of land. The project site involves some regions with slopes over 20% which increases erosion risk however turbine locations are determined in smooth and plane regions of the project site. Project design has been made considering this 22

23 facts and taking necessary precautions. Within this framework, project is not expected to alter erosion risk in the region. The pictures from project site are given above. (Source: Preliminary EIA Report-pages &65) Other pollutants No negative or significantly positive impact of project is identified. The distance of turbines to the nearest location has been defined as 525m(pre EIA page 28). the Dust formation during construction has been calculated in pre EIA which is lower than the allowed limits. Project owner will try to minimize this amount by spraying and carefully excavating the materials. Noise during construction and operation phases have also been calculated considering nearest settlement and determined below the limit values. Earflap will be given to staff working for maintenance of turbines. (Source: Preliminary EIA Report-pages 23, 25-28&66-67 and Exemption Letter of Ministry of Env. And Forestry) Biodiversity No negative or significantly positive impact of project is identified. Project will be located on a private land used for agricultural activities. The area except turbines will continue to be used for agricultural activities after project implementation. The bird migration has been considered in selection of project site location(pre EIA page 60). Impact of turbines on birds population has been investigated for another project very close to the proposed project and located at higher altitude and no impact has been observed. Since this project is not on the migration route and located at lower altitude, no interaction is expected. However, to ensure that no negative impact exists, a monitoring will be performed by project owner on the site during several times a year. Quality of employment Livelihood of the poor Access to (Source: Preliminary EIA Report-page43-44,60) Project activities will create many direct and indirect opportunities both locally, nationally and internationally. Staff working in the plant will be trained and certificated. Project will provide job opportunities for locals and increase local trade. Also, land owners will have more income due to rental fees paid by the company. (Source: Preliminary EIA Report-page 106) The project will help meet national energy demand and enable 23

24 affordable and clean energy services Human and institutional capacity Quantitative employment and income generation Balance of payments and investment Technology transfer and technological self-reliance diversification in the energy supply. ( Turkish Electricity Generation Statistics, EMRA/EPDK Turkish Electricity Market Regulatory Authority Reports) Project will have positive impact on income in the region. Since the impact is limited and difficult to monitor, this parameter is scored as zero. (Source: Annex I of GSV2.0 Toolkit) About 55 people will be employed during construction and 10 people during operation. Project will also create new job opportunities due to many indirect job opportunities also. (Source: Social security and insurance payment documents, agreements with contractors) Turkey is heavily dependent on import fossil fuel for electricity generation. Project will help to decrease the dependency of fuel import and result in net foreign currency saving and energy security. (TEIAS Turkish Electricity Transmission Corp- Electricity Capacity Projection Report ( ) Project will assist in transfer of new technology to Turkey. Technological skills of local suppliers and technicians are also expected to increase as a result of trainings provided by the equipment manufacturers. (Source: Equipment purchase agreements) 24

25 SECTION G. Sustainability Monitoring Plan No 1 Indicator Air Quality Mitigation measure Not required Chosen parameter 1.1 SO 2 emissions by thermal power plants Current situation of parameter Total SO 2 emission related to electricity generation is 1.1 about Gg for 2007 according to National Inventory of Turkey 8. Considering that electricity generation in 2007 is 183,339.7 GWh, SO 2 emission per MWh is calculated as 5.3 kg/mwh. Future target for parameter 1.1 SO 2 emission reduction corresponding to 115 GWh generation is calculated as 627 ton per year. Chosen parameter 1.2 Current situation of parameter 1.2 Future target for parameter 1.2 NOx emissions by thermal power plants Total SO 2 emission related to electricity generation is about Gg for 2007 according to National Inventory of Turkey. NOx emission per MWh is calculated as 1.1 kg. NOx emission reduction corresponding to 115 GWh generation is calculated as 127 ton per year. Way of monitoring How Electricity generated by Bandırma-3 WPP and NO X and SO 2 emission data from GHG inventory of Turkey will be used as reference in calculation of the emission reduction. When By who Additional remarks monitoring Yearly Project developer Electricity generated by National Grid is mainly composed of thermal power plants. In order to calculate contribution of the project to air quality, electricity generated by thermal power plants and fuels used for electricity generation will be used. No 5 Indicator Biodiversity Mitigation measure Impact of project on birds will be monitored and measures will be taken accordingly if necessary. Chosen parameter Current situation of parameter Future target for parameter Impact on Bird population None None. 8 pplication/zip/tur_2009_crf_13apr.zip,worksheet:table1s1 ) 25

26 Way of monitoring How Through site visits and observation reports. When Yearly By who Project Owner No 6 Indicator Quality of Employment Mitigation measure Recruited people will be trained for increasing technical skills and awareness about health, safety and environmental issues. Chosen parameter Number of people trained (certificates ) Current situation of parameter None Future target for parameter All technical staff working with high voltage equipments. Way of monitoring How Through evaluation of training certificates and new job opportunities created. When Yearly By who Project developer Additional remarks monitoring Although the effects of project on this parameter are obvious, it is difficult to measure quantitatively. No 10 Indicator Quantitative employment and income generation Mitigation measure Mitigation measure is not required. Chosen parameter People employed during construction and implementation phases, wages paid. Current situation of parameter None Future target for parameter 50 people during construction and 15 people during operation stage is planned to be employed. Payment made is to be determined later. Way of monitoring How Through evaluation documents for wages paid and social security documents. When Yearly By who Project developer No 11 Indicator Balance of payments Mitigation measure Decrease dependency on fossil fuel through increasing use of local resources. Chosen parameter Currency saving. Current situation of parameter In 2007, about 20.5 bn m3 natural gas been used for about 95,000 GWh electricity generation and about 5 26

27 bn has been spent. Source: for generation and fuelconsumption. for natural gas price. Future target for parameter Decrease natural gas consumed for electricity generation. Approximately consumption of 25 million m 3 of natural gas is expected to be avoided corresponding to 6.5 million annually. Way of monitoring How Through comparing electricity generated by Bandırma- 3 WPP and natural gas that would be used to produce the same amount of electricity according to baseline scenario. When Yearly By who Project developer No 12 Indicator Technology transfer and Self reliance Mitigation measure Mitigation measure is not required for this indicator. Chosen parameter Equipment expenditures Current situation of parameter None Future target for parameter To be determined during implementation phase. Way of monitoring How Review of purchasing agreements. When Yearly By who Project developer Additional remarks monitoring As part of the equipments will be provided from local companies, this will contribute development of local manufacturing and service companies working on the subject. 27

28 SECTION H. Additionality and conservativeness H.1. Additionality Additionality assessment is performed according to the Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality approved by UNFCCC. Details are available in PDD H.2. Conservativeness Conservative approach has been followed in calculating baseline emission factors and investment analysis sections as detailed in PDD. 28

29 ANNEX 1 ODA declarations 29

30 ANNEX 2 SFR Participation List

31 31

32 ANNEX 3 SFR Feedback Forms Summary of feedback forms were given in table below # Name Views regarding the meeting. 1 Zöhre Bör We were informed about the project. Thank you. 2 Ayşegül Dedeakayoğulları We were informed about the project. 3 Bahriye Köroğlu We were informed about the project. 4 Hatice Dedeakay We were informed about the project. Positive comments regarding the project. No negative impact on environment No negative impact on environment, on the contrary it is beneficial. No negative impact on environment, on the contrary it is beneficial. No negative impact on environment, on the contrary it is beneficial. 5 Nevin Ongunar Positive. No negative impact on environment 6 Nedime Arsan Thank you for Since there is no any these negative impact on constructive environment, I informations approved. 7 Emine Arsan We were informed about the project. Thank you. No negative impact on environment, on the contrary it is beneficial. 8 Nilgün Arsan - No negative impact on environment 9 Nefize Kan - No negative impact on environment Negative comments regarding the meeting No negative comments No negative comments No negative comment

33 33