SAMIRA Conference, Session 4, Quality and Safety: challenges for the management of non-energy radioactive waste and spent fuel. 21 March 2018.

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SAMIRA Conference, Session 4, Quality and Safety: challenges for the management of non-energy radioactive waste and spent fuel. 21 March 2018."

Transcription

1 SAMIRA Conference, Session 4, Quality and Safety: challenges for the management of non-energy radioactive waste and spent fuel 21 March 2018 France

2 Non electronuclear waste: a specific management Distribution of the volume of radioactive waste collected and delivered on Andra centers in the Aube department (figures are those at end 2016) Electronuclear waste EDF, CEA, Orano (VLLW + I&LLW- Short lived) m³ Non electronuclear waste (VLLW + I&LLW Short and long lived) m³ 4% 96%

3 Non electronuclear waste : a large diversity Andra collects each year more than waste packages coming from the non electronuclear sector Solid waste, approx. 29 t 16 t burnable waste 11 t non burnable waste 2 t putrescible waste Solvents and oils [POURCENT AGE] Scintillation vials, less than 17 t Liquid waste, approx 28 t 3 t solvents and oils 25 t liquid aqueous waste Aqueous liquid waste [POURCENT AGE] Scintillation vials [POURCENT AGE] Lightning rods 2,4 t Radioactive salts/radium objects 3,4 t Smoke detectors 165 kg Sealed sources 470 kg ORUM 8 kg Putrescible waste [POURCENT AGE] Non burnable solid waste [POURCENT AGE] Burnable solid waste [POURCENT AGE] Particular waste: containing chemicals, specific radioelements, liquids, sometimes biological material

4 Non electronuclear waste : a large diversity of situations and producers» A wide spectrum of actors: o More than producers : universities, laboratories, industrials, public and private research organisms, individuals, conventional waste collection organisms o More than 80% of the volumes are being collected through the health sector : hospitals, private and academic research o 400 active producers / year o approx 600 requests treated / year o In a contexte where the volumes collected from the private research sector are declining o o Technology changes Globalization» Figures : o An average of 0,89 m 3 par production site / year o Less than 10% of the producers represent 50 % of the collected volumes» A spectrum of services that is wider than that offered to electronuclear producers

5 Outlets Socodei/Centraco Operating Nuclear facility Incinération date of opening: 1999 Capacity: t solid waste /year maximum and tons of liquid waste Andra disposal facility For I&LLW short lived (CSA) Operating Nuclear facility date of opening : 13 january 1992 surface : 95 ha including 30 ha of disposal cells Capacity: 1 million cubic meters of I&LLW-short lived Operating timescale: 60 years Industrial centre of regroupment, storage and disposal of VLLW (Cires) Operating classified facility as regard to the environment date of opening : 14 august 2003 surface : 43 ha including 28,5 ha of disposal cells Capacité de stockage : cubic meters of VLLW Operating timescale : years

6 Sensitive management solutions Management route that can benefit from the solutions that have been put in place for the electronuclear branch but dependant on those facilities detained by unique actors, and adapted and dimensioned mainly for electronuclear waste. The Socodei industrial accident in 2011 immobilized the management routes for non electronuclear waste for more than one year. Need to pre-treat most of the non electronuclear waste, activity of treatment being a key step, that in the past has long been subcontracted to electronuclear branch actors. Moreover, the non electronuclear sector has intrinsic difficulties : Low volumes (tonnage inferior to 80 tons/ year) Decreasing volumes (-4%/year approx.) Waste is very variable in nature and radiological activity Team turn-over rate is high, and often they aren t specialized in waste management

7 Principles applied by Andra Need to adress the issues expressed by the producers Need to deal with small fluxes with a wide range of properties and characteristics Waste management solutions are often perceived as a low valued process, far from the heart of their activity, heavy, long, restrictive and expensive To adress this diagnosis Andra has put in place: A more developed service and advice level than for electronuclear producers (as a response to the mastery degree and level of control of those producers regarding waste management issues) Internal stable and long term solutions to avoid service perturbations Synergy between Andra s diffrent industrial activities allowing to rationalize the logistical chain to better control costs and plannings Allowing Andra to control its industrial needs regarding treatment operations As soon as 2008, studies have been launched for a new regroupment and storage facility (operational in 2012) In 2011, studies have been launched to internalize key industrial functions of sorting and treating of non electronuclear waste, activities formerly subcontracted (operational in 2016)

8 Collect and deal with waste coming from non electronuclear activities Thus, for waste coming from non electronuclear activities, Andra ensures following functions: Regroupment Disposal Collecting and packages providing Sorting / Treatment Storage (for low and intermediate level waste, long lived)

9 Regroupment facility» In 2016 : collected packages packages evacuated to treatment storage or disposal facilities 08/11/2017

10 Storage facility (for low and intermediate level waste, long lived)» End 2016, 822 m 3 radioactive waste packages have been stored, representing 18 % of the volumic capacity authorized for the building (6 000 m3). 08/11/2017

11 Sorting, control and treatment facility» Operational since 2016» Dedicated to small producers waste 08/11/2017

12 Special waste Complex waste (quickilver and quicksilver contaminated waste, strongly tritiated waste, gazeous waste, special chemical waste, reactive metallic waste) Legacy and orpphan waste (issue mainly coming from the lack in characterization and knowledge of the contamination history) including activated waste Sealed sources» Recovery by provider or manufacturer

13 CERN Example CERN (the European Organization for Nuclear Research) was founded in 1954 in order to» promote the european scientific collaboration» Ensure collaboration between european member states regarding fundamental research in particle physics» Provide the scientific community with a laboratory specialized in particle accelerators Storage of waste in a building that formerly hosted an accelerator» Large amount of waste (superior to 7000 m3)» Wide diversity of waste» Electro-magnets, electrical wires, metallic waste, technological waste, concrete blocks, etc. Waste management routes :» Free release (CH), VLLW, I&LLW-short lived