ENERGY EFFICIENCY / RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPACT IN THE TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN (TERP) VOLUME III APPENDIX

Transcription

1 ESL-TR-4/-5 ENERGY EFFICIENCY / RENEWABLE ENERGY IMPACT IN THE TEXAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION PLAN (TERP) VOLUME III APPENDIX Annual Report to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality September August 4 Jeff Haberl, Ph.D., P.E., Charles Culp, Ph.D., P.E. Bahman Yazdani, P.E., Don Gilman Tom Fitzpatrick, Shirley Muns, C.B.O. Malcolm Verdict, C.E.M., Mushtaq Ahmed Betty Liu, Juan-Carlos Baltazar-Cervantes John Bryant, Ph.D., P.E., Larry Degelman, P.E. Dan Turner, Ph.D., P.E. December 4 ENERGY SYSTEMS LABORATORY Texas Engineering Experiment Station Texas A&M University System

2 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. February, 5 ENERGY SYSTEMS LABORATORY Texas Engineering Experiment Station Texas A&M University System 58 TAMU College Station, Texas Chairman Kathleen Hartnett White Texas Council on Environmental Quality P. O. Box 87 Austin, TX Dear Chairman White: The Energy Systems Laboratory (ESL) at the Texas Engineering Experiment Station of the Texas A&M University System is pleased to provide its third annual report, Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy Impact in the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP), as required under Texas Health and Safety Code Ann. 88. (e), Vernon Supp. (Senate Bill 5, 77R as amended 78 R & 78S). The ESL is required to annually report the energy savings from statewide adoption of the Texas Building Energy Performance Standards in SB 5, as amended, and the relative impact of proposed local energy code amendments in the 4 Texas non-attainment and affected counties as part of the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP). Please contact me at (979) should you or any of the TCEQ staff have any questions concerning this report or any of the work presently being done to quantify emissions reductions from energy efficiency and renewable energy measures as a result of the TERP implementation. Sincerely, W. Dan Turner, P.E. Director Enclosure cc: Commissioner R. B. Ralph Marquez Commissioner Larry R. Soward December 4.

3 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. Disclaimer This report is provided by the Texas Engineering Experiment Station (TEES) as required under Section 88., (e) () (A) & (B) of the Texas Health and Safety Code and is distributed for purposes of public information. The information provided in this report is intended to be the best available information at the time of publication. TEES makes no claim or warranty, expressed or implied, that the report or data herein is necessarily error-free. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Energy Systems Laboratory or any of its employees. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Texas Engineering Experiment Station or the Energy Systems Laboratory. December 4.

4 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. VOLUME III APPENDIX Energy Efficiency / Renewable Energy Impact In The Texas Emissions Reduction Plan ABSTRACT The Energy Systems Laboratory, in fulfillment of its responsibilities under Texas Health and Safety Code Ann. 88. (e), Vernon Supp., submits its third annual report, Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy (EE/RE) Impact in the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The report is organized in three volumes. Volume Summary Report, provides an executive summary with key areas summarized; Volume II Technical Report, provides a detailed report of activities, methodologies and findings; Volume III Technical Appendix, contains detailed data from simulations for each of the forty-one counties included in the analysis. The Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP), established by the 77 th Texas Legislature with the enactment of Senate Bill 5 (SB 5), identified that EE/RE measures may make an important contribution for meeting the minimum federal ambient air quality standards. The 78 th Legislature further enhanced the use of EE/RE programs for meeting TERP goals by requiring the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to promote the use of EE/RE as a way of meeting the federal air quality standards and to develop a methodology for computing emissions reduction for the State Implementation Plan (SIP) from EE/RE programs. The TERP legislation adopted the energy efficiency provisions of the International Residential Code (IRC) and the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential, commercial and industrial buildings. Under the TERP legislation, the Energy Systems Laboratory (Laboratory) at the Texas Engineering Experiment Station of the Texas A&M University System must determine the energy savings from energy code adoption and, when applicable, from more stringent local codes or above-code performance ratings and must report these reductions annually to the TCEQ. Using data available from the TCEQ and the US EPA with procedures developed by the Laboratory, the following results were determined for energy-code compliant new residential single and multi-family construction in both non-attainment and affected counties built in 4. The annual savings in 4 amounted to,86 megawatt hours of electricity and 667,945 million Btus of natural gas. The resultant annual NOx reductions were 46 tons. On the peak day (August 9, 999, baseline in the historical air quality model), the savings would have been,7 MWh/day and,48 million Btus of natural gas, resulting in peak-day NOx emissions reductions of.89 tons. Cumulative NOx reductions, projected to 7 and, from energy efficiency savings from code-compliant new construction in single-family and multi-family residences were determined to be: 84 tons/year, and.8 tons/peak-day in 7; and,46 tons/year with 6.58 tons/peak-day in. The Laboratory was requested to review proposed code amendments from the City of Houston and the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). In both cases, the stringency of proposed amendments was determined to be substantially equal to the state standards; this information was conveyed to the requesting code authorities. In addition, the Laboratory quantified energy reductions for the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG) for their Early Action Compact as part of our technical assistance efforts. December 4.

5 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 4 The Laboratory has and will continue to provide leading edge technical assistance to counties and communities working toward obtaining full SIP credit for the energy efficiency and renewable energy projects that are lowering the emissions and improving the air for all Texans. The Laboratory will continue to provide superior technology to the State of Texas through efforts with the TCEQ and US EPA. The efforts taken by the Laboratory have produced significant success in bringing EE/RE closer to EPA acceptance in the SIP. The Energy Systems Laboratory provides the third annual report, Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy (EE/RE) Impact in the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP), to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) in fulfillment of its responsibilities under Texas Health and Safety Code Ann. 88., (e) () (a) & (b) (Vernon Supp. ). If any questions arise, please contact us by phone at , or by at SB5info@esl.tamu.edu. December 4.

6 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work has been completed as a fulfillment of the requirements in Texas Health Code, Senate Bill 5, Section 88.. Portions of the work in this annual report were funded by grant from the U.S. E.P.A. through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Similarly, selected Code training workshops were funded by the U.S.D.O.E. through the Texas State Energy Conservation Office (SECO). The authors are also grateful for the timely input provided by the following individuals, and agencies: Mr. Joe Huang at LBNL who provided helpful advice on the many DOE- questions; Mr. Art Diem, US EPA, for providing the egrid database; Mr. Thomas Smith, Texas Public Citizen, for frequent discussions about strategies for emissions reductions; Mr. Steve Anderson and Mr. Alfred Reyes, TCEQ, for contributing helpful insight about improvement to the Emissions Reduction Calculator. Numerous additional individuals at the Laboratory contributed significantly to this report, including: Dr. David Claridge, Ms. Sherrie Hughes, Dr. Grant Suhm, Mr. Peter Klima, Mr. Kelly Milligan, Mr. Jim Sweeney, Mr. Carlos Ortiz, Ms. Vivian Yu, Mr. Piljae Im, Mr. Seongchan Kim, Ms. Chayapa Chaoncharoensuk, Ms. Jaya Mukhopadhyay, Mr. Soolyeon Cho, Ms. Mini Malhotra, and Mr. Suwon Song. December 4.

7 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT... ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... 5 CODE AND PRE-CODE SIMULATION RESULTS BY COUNTY... December 4.

8 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 7 TABLE OF TABLES Table : List of Counties.... Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residences for Bastrop (Single Family and Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Bastrop (Single Family)... 4 Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Bastrop (Single Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Bastrop (Multi-Family)... 6 Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Bastrop (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Bexar (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Bexar (Single Family)... 9 Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Bexar (Single Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Bexar (Multi-Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Bexar (Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Caldwell (Single Family and Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Caldwell (Single Family)... 4 Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Caldwell (Single Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Caldwell (Multi-Family)... 6 Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Caldwell (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Comal (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Comal (Single Family)... 9 Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Comal (Single Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Comal (Multi-Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Comal (Multi-Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Ellis (Single Family and Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Ellis (Single Family)... 4 Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Ellis (Single Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Ellis (Multi-Family)... 6 Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Ellis (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Gregg (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Gregg (Single Family) Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Gregg (Single Family)... 4 Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Gregg (Multi-Family) Table : Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Gregg (Multi-Family)... 4 Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Guadalupe (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Guadalupe (Single Family) Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Guadalupe (Single Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Guadalupe (Multi-Family) Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Guadalupe (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Harrison (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Harrison (Single Family) Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Harrison (Single Family)... 5 Table 4: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Harrison (Multi-Family) Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Harrison (Multi-Family)... 5 Table 4: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Hays (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 4: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Hays (Single Family) Table 44: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Hays (Single Family) Table 45: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Hays (Multi-Family) December 4.

9 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 8 Table 46: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Hays (Multi-Family) Table 47: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Henderson (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 48: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Henderson (Single Family) Table 49: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Henderson (Single Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Henderson (Multi-Family)... 6 Table 5: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Henderson (Multi-Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Hood (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Hood (Single Family) Table 54: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Hood (Single Family) Table 55: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Hood (Multi-Family) Table 56: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Hood (Multi-Family) Table 57: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Hunt (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 58: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Hunt (Single Family) Table 59: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Hunt (Single Family)... 7 Table 6: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Hunt (Multi-Family) Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Hunt (Multi-Family)... 7 Table 6: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Johnson (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 6: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Johnson (Single Family) Table 64: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Johnson (Single Family) Table 65: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Johnson (Multi-Family) Table 66: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Johnson (Multi-Family) Table 67: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Kaufman (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 68: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Kaufman (Single Family) Table 69: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Kaufman (Single Family)... 8 Table 7: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Kaufman (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Kaufman (Multi-Family)... 8 Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Nueces (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Nueces (Single Family) Table 74: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Nueces (Single Family) Table 75: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Nueces (Multi-Family) Table 76: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Nueces (Multi-Family) Table 77: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Parker (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 78: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Parker (Single Family) Table 79: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Parker (Single Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Parker (Multi-Family)... 9 Table 8: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Parker (Multi-Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Rockwall (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Rockwall (Single Family) Table 84: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Rockwall (Single Family) Table 85: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Rockwall (Multi-Family) Table 86: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Rockwall (Multi-Family) Table 87: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Rusk (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 88: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Rusk (Single Family) Table 89: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Rusk (Single Family).... Table 9: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Rusk (Multi-Family)... Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Rusk (Multi-Family).... December 4.

10 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 9 Table 9: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for San Patricio (Single Family and Multi-Family).... Table 9: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for San Patricio (Single Family)... 4 Table 94: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for San Patricio (Single Family) Table 95: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for San Patricio (Multi-Family)... 6 Table 96: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for San Patricio (Multi-Family) Table 97: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Smith (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 98: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Smith (Single Family)... 9 Table 99: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Smith (Single Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Smith (Multi-Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Smith (Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Travis (Single Family and Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Travis (Single Family) Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Travis (Single Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Travis (Multi-Family) Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Travis (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Upshur (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Upshur (Single Family) Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Upshur (Single Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Upshur (Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Upshur (Multi-Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Victoria (Single Family and Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Victoria (Single Family) Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Victoria (Single Family)... 5 Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Victoria (Multi-Family) Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Victoria (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Williamson (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Williamson (Single Family)... 9 Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Williamson (Single Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Williamson (Multi-Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Williamson (Multi-Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Wilson (Single Family and Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Wilson (Single Family)... 4 Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Wilson (Single Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Wilson (Multi-Family)... 6 Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Wilson (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Brazoria (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Brazoria (Single Family)... 9 Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Brazoria (Single Family)... 4 Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Brazoria (Multi-Family) Table : Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Brazoria (Multi-Family)... 4 Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Chambers (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Chambers (Single Family) Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Chambers (Single Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Chambers (Multi-Family) Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Chambers (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Collin (Single Family and Multi-Family) December 4.

11 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Collin (Single Family) Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Collin (Single Family)... 5 Table 4: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Collin (Multi-Family) Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Collin (Multi-Family)... 5 Table 4: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Dallas (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 4: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Dallas (Single Family) Table 44: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Dallas (Single Family) Table 45: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Dallas (Multi-Family) Table 46: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Dallas (Multi-Family) Table 47: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Denton (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 48: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Denton (Single Family) Table 49: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Denton (Single Family)... 6 Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Denton (Multi-Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Denton (Multi-Family)... 6 Table 5: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for El Paso (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for El Paso (Single Family) Table 54: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for El Paso (Single Family) Table 55: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for El Paso (Multi-Family) Table 56: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for El Paso (Multi-Family) Table 57: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Fort Bend (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 58: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Fort Bend (Single Family) Table 59: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Fort Bend (Single Family)... 7 Table 6: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Fort Bend (Multi-Family) Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Fort Bend (Multi-Family)... 7 Table 6: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Galveston (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 6: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Galveston (Single Family) Table 64: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Galveston (Single Family) Table 65: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Galveston (Multi-Family) Table 66: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Galveston (Multi-Family) Table 67: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Hardin (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 68: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Hardin (Single Family) Table 69: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Hardin (Single Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Hardin (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Hardin (Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Harris (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 7: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Harris (Single Family) Table 74: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Harris (Single Family) Table 75: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Harris (Multi-Family) Table 76: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Harris (Multi-Family) Table 77: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Jefferson (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 78: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Jefferson (Single Family) Table 79: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Jefferson (Single Family)... 9 Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Jefferson (Multi-Family)... 9 Table 8: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Jefferson (Multi-Family)... 9 Table 8: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Liberty (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Liberty (Single Family) Table 84: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Liberty (Single Family) December 4.

12 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. Table 85: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Liberty (Multi-Family) Table 86: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Liberty (Multi-Family) Table 87: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Montgomery (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 88: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Montgomery (Single Family) Table 89: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Montgomery (Single Family)... Table 9: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Montgomery (Multi-Family).... Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Montgomery (Multi-Family)... Table 9: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Orange (Single Family and Multi-Family).... Table 9: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Orange (Single Family) Table 94: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Orange (Single Family)... 5 Table 95: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Orange (Multi-Family) Table 96: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Orange (Multi-Family)... 7 Table 97: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Tarrant (Single Family and Multi-Family) Table 98: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Tarrant (Single Family) Table 99: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Tarrant (Single Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Tarrant (Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Tarrant (Multi-Family)... Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Waller (Single Family and Multi-Family).... Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Waller (Single Family) Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Waller (Single Family)... 5 Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Waller (Multi-Family) Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Waller (Multi-Family)... 7 December 4.

13 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. CODE AND PRE-CODE SIMULATION RESULTS BY COUNTY This appendix to the Laboratory s 4 Annual report contains the simulation results for single-family and multi-family residences in the 4 counties. For each county, code and pre-code simulation, and annual and peak-day results for individual residence are provided (Single Family and Multi-Family). County Climate Zone Bastrop 4 Bexar 4 Caldwell 4 Comal 4 Ellis 5 Gregg 6 Guadalupe 4 Harrison 6 Hays 5 Henderson 6 Hood 5 Hunt 5 Affected County Johnson 5 Kaufman 6 Nueces Parker 6 Rockwall 6 Rusk 5 San Patricio Smith 5 Travis 5 Upshur 6 Victoria Williamson 5 Wilson 4 Brazoria Chambers 4 Collin 5 Dallas 5 Denton 6 El Paso 6 Fort Bend 4 Nonattainment County Galveston Hardin 4 Harris 4 Jefferson 4 Liberty 4 Montgomery 4 Orange 4 Tarrant 5 Waller 4 Table : List of Counties. December 4.

14 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. County SF or MF Precode or Codecompliant Precode SF Code - Compliant Bastrop Precode MF Code - Compliant Crawl Space Crawl Space Options Simulation # Annual (kwh/yr) Annual NG (Therms/yr) Peak-day (kwh/day) (Aug. 9) Peak-day NG (Therm/day) (Aug. 9) Annual ( + NG) (MBtu) Annual (kwh/yr) Annual NG (Therms/yr) Peak-day (kwh/day) (Aug. 9) Peak-day NG (Therm/day) (Aug. 9) Annual ( + NG) (MBtu) -story story story story story story story story story story story story story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residences for Bastrop (Single Family and Multi-Family). December 4.

15 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 4 County Name Division (East or West Texas) Number of new building Bastrop East Texas permits for SFD and NG water cooling, Heat pump and elec. water 4 Number of Houses for Each simulation (94.6%) -Story (59%) 77.% 4.% 8.9%.6% 4%.% 55.8% -Story (4%) 9.9% 7.%.6% (5.4%) -Story (59%).5%.6%.% -Story (4%).7%.4%.% 77.% 8.9% 4.% Number of Houses for each simulation cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water 77.% 8.9% 4% (94.6%) -Story (59%) 7 -Story (4%) 9 5 (5.4%) -Story (59%) 8 8.8%.%.%.% 69 7 Number of Houses cooling, NG and NG water All electricity cooling, Heat pump and elec. water & -story & -story & - story & -story -Story (4%) Precode Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water Code compliant Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water -Story 6, 97,48,87 -Story,86 4 8,784 8,688 -Story 4,66 9 9, 9,59 -Story,457 7,56 7,7 -Story 6,68 87,8,66 -Story 4,49 4 9,59 9, -Story 5,9 76,84,78 -Story,97 9 8,647 8,6 6,79,5 8, 8,59 54, ,46 7,76 Precode Energy Use (For total houses in a County) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water Code compliant Energy Use (For total houses in a County) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water -Story,94 8, ,9 8,568 -Story,8,87 6 4,56,87 -Story,7 6, ,786 6,86 -Story,5,9 8 8,59,9 -Story 6, ,67 -Story 9, ,69 -Story 8,47 5 6,47 -Story 7,4 6,4,57 68,9, ,99 68,9,6 54,4,4 9 4,67 54,4 Energy Due to the Code Adoption cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water NG NG NG NG -Story 9 8, ,8 -Story 45 5, ,47 -Story Story , ,96 Annual Electricity Annual Natural Gas 5 9, Annual Electricity and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Annual NG 8, 7, 6, 5, 4,,,, and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Bastrop (Single Family). December 4.

16 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 5 Precode Peak-day Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water Code compliant Peak-day Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water -Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Precode Peak-day Energy Use (For total houses in a County) Code compliant Peak-day Energy Use (For total houses in a County) cooling, Heat cooling, Heat and NG water pump and and NG water pump and elec. elec. water water -Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Peak-day Energy Due to the Code Adoption cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water NG NG NG NG -Story Story Story Story Peak-day Electricity Peak-day Natural Gas Peak Electricity and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Peak NG and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Bastrop (Single Family). December 4.

17 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 6 County Name NAHB Division Number of new building Bastrop West South Central permits for MF 77 and NG water and elec. water 5 45 Number of Houses in Each Simulation (%) -Story (.6%) -Story (89.%) -Story (8.%) Number of Houses for each simulation (%) -Story (.6%) -Story (89.%) -Story (8.%) 9.5% 66.4% 4.%.5%.7%.7% 7.7% 59.6%.56%.6% 5.5%.7% 9.5% 66.4% 4.% and NG water and elec. water 9.5% 66.4% 4.% % 89.% 8.%.% Number of Houses and NG water cooling, Heat pump and elec. water & -Story & -story & -story Precode Energy Use for each option (per house) and NG water and elec. water Code compliant Energy Use for each option (per house) and NG water and elec. water -Story 6,67 4,69,69 -Story 5,959,4, -Story 6, 4,54,5 -Story 5,876,,9 -Story 6,49 4,548,548 -Story 5,95 99,4,4 8,87 74,76,76 7,74 6,794,79 Precode Energy Use (For total houses in a County) and NG water and elec. water Code compliant Energy Use (For total houses in a County) and NG water and elec. water -Story Story Story 8, ,4 -Story 79, ,67 -Story Story , ,69 88, 5 7, Energy Due to the Code Adoption and NG water and elec. water -Story 6 6 -Story Story Annual Electricity Annual Natural Gas 6 6 Annual Electricity and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story & -Story Slab-on-Grade & -Story Annual NG 5 4 and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story Slab-on-Grade & -Story Table 5: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Bastrop (Multi-Family). December 4.

18 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 7 Precode Peak-day Energy Use for each option (per house) and NG water and elec. water Code compliant Peak-day Energy Use for each option (per house) and NG water and elec. water -Story Story Story Story Story Story Precode Peak-day Energy Use (For total houses in a County) Code compliant Peak-day Energy Use (For total houses in a County) and NG water and elec. water and NG water and elec. water -Story Story Story Story Story Story Energy Due to the Code Adoption and NG water and elec. water NG NG NG -Story Story Story Peak-day Electricity Peak-day Natural Gas Peak-day Electricity Slab-on-Grade & -Story & -Story Slab-on-Grade & -Story Peak-day NG Slab-on-Grade & -Story Slab-on-Grade & -Story and NG water and elec. water and NG water and elec. water Table 6: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Bastrop (Multi-Family). December 4.

19 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 8 County SF or MF Precode or Codecompliant Precode SF Code - Compliant Bexar Precode MF Code - Compliant Crawl Space Crawl Space Options Simulation # Annual (kwh/yr) Annual NG (Therms/yr) Peak-day (kwh/day) (Aug. 9) Peak-day NG (Therm/day) (Aug. 9) Annual ( + NG) (MBtu) Annual (kwh/yr) Annual NG (Therms/yr) Peak-day (kwh/day) (Aug. 9) Peak-day NG (Therm/day) (Aug. 9) Annual ( + NG) (MBtu) -story story story story story story story story story story story story story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story Table 7: Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Bexar (Single Family and Multi-Family). December 4.

20 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 9 County Name Bexar Division (East or West Texas) West Texas Number of new building permits for SFD 7,699 (94.6%) -Story (59%) -Story (4%) (5.4%) -Story (59%) -Story (4%) Number of Houses for each simulation (94.6%) -Story (59%) -Story (4%) (5.4%) -Story (59%) -Story (4%) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water 77.% 8.9% 4% 4.%.6%.% 9.9% 7.%.6%.5%.6%.%.7%.4%.% 77.% 8.9% 4.% cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water 77.% 8.9% 4%, 86 69, ,96, % 8.8%.%.%.% 4,96, ,699 Number of Houses,5,,5,,5, 5 cooling, NG and NG water Number of Houses for Each simulation All electricity cooling, Heat pump and elec. water & -story & -story & - story & -story Precode Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water Code compliant Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water -Story 5,4,77,44 -Story,9 5 8,9 8,4 -Story,8 8,84 8,575 -Story,99 5 7,8 6,99 -Story 5,68,9,98 -Story, ,86 8,7 -Story 4,99 95,8,7 -Story,98 5 8,66 8,7 58,95,7 8,8 79,988 5, ,549 7,78 Precode Energy Use (For total houses in a County) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water Code compliant Energy Use (For total houses in a County) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water -Story 49,794,59,8 6,95,46 7,7,59,8 -Story 4,5 8,95 4,966,8 6,85 8,95 -Story,57 78,4,585,88 4,446 78,4 -Story 7,45 575,5 9,65,9 9, 575,5 -Story, 59, ,5 59,667 -Story,646 46, ,66 46,579 -Story,96 8, ,74 8,6 -Story,74, ,44,758 85,9,875,884 9,4 6,65,545,875,884 75,6,48,79 6,4 5,46 6,6,48,79 Energy Due to the Code Adoption cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water NG NG NG NG -Story 6,459 8,49, ,8 8,49 -Story,58 4, , 4,74 -Story 64, ,88 -Story 7, ,85, 9,95,7 64,94 9,95 Annual Electricity Annual Natural Gas 7, 5, Annual Electricity 6, 5, 4,,,, and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Annual NG, 5,, 5, and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Table 8: Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Bexar (Single Family). December 4.

21 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. Precode Peak-day Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water Code compliant Peak-day Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water -Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Precode Peak-day Energy Use (For total houses in a County) Code compliant Peak-day Energy Use (For total houses in a County) cooling, Heat cooling, Heat and NG water pump and and NG water pump and elec. elec. water water -Story 9.87, , Story.8, , Story 45.8, ,55.8 -Story 5.5, , Story Story Story Story , , , ,78.76 Peak-day Energy Due to the Code Adoption cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water NG NG NG NG -Story Story Story Story Peak-day Electricity Peak-day Natural Gas Peak Electricity and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Peak NG and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Table 9: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Bexar (Single Family). December 4.

22 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. County Name NAHB Division Number of new building Bexar West South Central permits for MF,48 and NG water and elec. water,4 Number of Houses in Each Simulation (%) -Story (.6%) -Story (89.%) -Story (8.%) Number of Houses for each simulation (%) -Story (.6%) -Story (89.%) -Story (8.%) 9.5% 66.4% 4.%.5%.7%.7% 7.7% 59.6%.56%.6% 5.5%.7% 9.5% 66.4% 4.% and NG water and elec. water 9.5% 66.4% 4.% , ,6 89.6% 89.% 8.%.% 5,85 7,48 Number of Houses,, cooling, NG and NG water cooling, Heat pump and elec. water & -Story & -story & -story Precode Energy Use for each option (per house) and NG water and elec. water Code compliant Energy Use for each option (per house) and NG water and elec. water -Story 6,67 47,48,48 -Story 5,75 7,,96 -Story 5,996 45,75,77 -Story 5,7 4,6, -Story 6,5 44,48,48 -Story 5,74 4,6,59 8,98 75,6,64 7,67 65,5,488 Precode Energy Use (For total houses in a County) and NG water and elec. water Code compliant Energy Use (For total houses in a County) and NG water and elec. water -Story 6, ,559 -Story 59, ,49 -Story,4 87,,57,67 7,75 87, -Story,9 7,678,8,67 6,97 7,678 -Story 8,9,75 49,64 8,9 -Story 9 6,745,47 4,58 6,745,97 97,65 4,6,998 9,5 97,65,79 8,57,789,97 8,995 8,57 Energy Due to the Code Adoption and NG water and elec. water -Story Story 5 4, , -Story, ,48 8 6, ,8 Annual Electricity Annual Natural Gas 5 6, Annual Electricity and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story & -Story Slab-on-Grade & -Story Annual NG 4,,, 8, 6, 4,, and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story Slab-on-Grade & -Story Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Bexar (Multi-Family). December 4.

23 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. Precode Peak-day Energy Use for each option (per house) and NG water and elec. water Code compliant Peak-day Energy Use for each option (per house) and NG water and elec. water -Story Story Story Story Story Story Precode Peak-day Energy Use (For total houses in a County) Code compliant Peak-day Energy Use (For total houses in a County) and NG water and elec. water and NG water and elec. water -Story Story Story Story Story Story Energy Due to the Code Adoption and NG water and elec. water NG NG NG -Story Story Story Peak-day Electricity Peak-day Natural Gas Peak-day Electricity Slab-on-Grade & -Story & -Story Slab-on-Grade & -Story Peak-day NG Slab-on-Grade & -Story Slab-on-Grade & -Story and NG water and elec. water and NG water and elec. water Table : Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Bexar (Multi-Family). December 4.

24 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. County SF or MF Precode or Codecompliant Precode SF Code - Compliant Caldwell Precode MF Code - Compliant Crawl Space Crawl Space Options Simulation # Annual (kwh/yr) Annual NG (Therms/yr) Peak-day (kwh/day) (Aug. 9) Peak-day NG (Therm/day) (Aug. 9) Annual ( + NG) (MBtu) Annual (kwh/yr) Annual NG (Therms/yr) Peak-day (kwh/day) (Aug. 9) Peak-day NG (Therm/day) (Aug. 9) Annual ( + NG) (MBtu) -story story story story story story story story story story story story story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story , story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story story Table : Code and Pre-code Simulation Results for Individual Residence for Caldwell (Single Family and Multi-Family). December 4.

25 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 4 County Name Caldwell Division (East or West Texas) West Texas Number of new building permits for SFD and NG water cooling, Heat pump and elec. water 6 Number of Houses for Each simulation (94.6%) -Story (59%) 77.% 4.% 8.9%.6% 4%.% 55.8% 5 -Story (4%) 9.9% 7.%.6% (5.4%) -Story (59%).5%.6%.% -Story (4%).7%.4%.% 77.% 8.9% 4.% Number of Houses for each simulation cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water 77.% 8.9% 4% (94.6%) -Story (59%) 5 -Story (4%) 6 9 (5.4%) -Story (59%) 8.8%.%.%.% Number of Houses 4 cooling, NG and NG water All electricity cooling, Heat pump and elec. water & -story & -story & - story & -story -Story (4%) 94 5 Precode Energy Use for each option (per house) and NG water cooling, Heat pump and elec. water Code compliant Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water -Story 6,8 97,8,5 -Story,87 4 8,76 8,665 -Story 4,7 9 9,7 9,5 -Story,44 7,45 7,6 -Story 6,64 88,77,584 -Story 4, ,6 9,76 -Story 5,88 76,85,68 -Story, ,6 8,578 6,68,5 8,64 8,45 54, ,965 7,679 Precode Energy Use (For total houses in a County) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water Code compliant Energy Use (For total houses in a County) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water -Story 844 5, ,77 5,58 -Story 76,76 4 5,9,76 -Story 5, ,65 -Story 454 8, ,499 -Story Story Story Story ,49 7, , 7,647,5, ,76,95 Energy Due to the Code Adoption cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water NG NG NG NG -Story 8, ,5 -Story 58,6 7 78,6 -Story Story , ,7 Annual Electricity Annual Natural Gas Annual Electricity and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Annual NG,5,,5,,5, 5 and NG water and elec. water Slab-on-Grade & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Table : Code and Pre-code Annual Simulation Results for Caldwell (Single Family). December 4.

26 TERP Report, Vol. III, p. 5 Precode Peak-day Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water Code compliant Peak-day Energy Use for each option (per house) cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water -Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Precode Peak-day Energy Use (For total houses in a County) Code compliant Peak-day Energy Use (For total houses in a County) cooling, Heat cooling, Heat and NG water pump and and NG water pump and elec. elec. water water -Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Story Peak-day Energy Due to the Code Adoption cooling, Heat and NG water pump and elec. water NG NG NG NG -Story Story Story Story Peak-day Electricity Peak-day Natural Gas Peak Electricity Slab-on-Grade & -Story & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story Peak NG Slab-on-Grade & -Story Crawl Spaces & -Story and NG water and elec. water and NG water and elec. water Table 4: Code and Pre-code Peak Day Simulation Results for Caldwell (Single Family). December 4.