National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and Partners

Transcription

1 .gc.ca Services Departments Français National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and Partners Home Submission Management Help My Profile:Jon Pereira Logout Ec.gc.ca SWIM 2016 Viasystems Toronto, Inc. Sheppard Facility Report Preview Report Preview Report Details Report Year Report Type: Report Status: Modified Date/Time: 2016 NPRI,ON MOE TRA Submitted 30/05/2017 4:03 PM Company and Facility Details Company : Business Number: Mailing Address: Facility : NAICS Code: NPRI ID: Physical Address: Viasystems Toronto, Inc Delivery Mode: GeneralDelivery Address Line 1: 8150 Sheppard Avenue East City, Province/Territory, Postal Code: Toronto Ontario M1B5K2 Country: Sheppard Facility Address Line 1: 8150 Sheppard Avenue East City, Province/Territory, Postal Code: Toronto Ontario M1B5K2 Country: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Zone: 17 UTM Easting: UTM rthing: Parent Companies Company : Mailing Address: Sheppard Facility Address Line 1: City, Province/Territory, Postal Code: ne Country: ne Permits Number or Permit Number: Government Department, Agency, or Program : Number or Permit Number: Government Department, Agency, or Program : Number or Permit Number: N5LSA Ministry of the Environment, Cert. of Air Approval ON Ministry of the Environment, Regulation

2 Government Department, Agency, or Program : Number or Permit Number: Government Department, Agency, or Program : CEPA EIHW Export tice Number ( ) CEPA EIHW Export tice Number ( ) Contacts Details Contact Type : Position: Telephone: Fax: Contact Type : Position: Telephone: Mailing Address: Technical Contact, Certifying Official, Company Coordinator, Person who prepared the report, Person who coordinated the preparation of the Toxics Reduction Plan, Public Contact Mark Scruton Dir. of EHSS of AMII Mark.Scruton@ttm.com Highest Ranking Employee Jon Pereira VP Operations of AMII Jon.Pereira@ttm.com Delivery Mode: GeneralDelivery Address Line 1: 8150 Sheppard Avenue East City, Province/Territory, Postal Code: Toronto Ontario M1B 5K2 Country: General Information Number of employees: Activities for Which the 20,000 Hour Employee Threshold Does t Apply: Activities Relevant to Reporting Dioxins, Furans and Hexacholorobenzene: Activities Relevant to Reporting of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Is this the first time the facility is reporting to the NPRI (under current or past ownership): Is the facility controlled by another Canadian company or companies: Did the facility report under other environmental regulations or permits: Is the facility required to report one or more NPRI Part 4 substances (Criteria Air Contaminants): General Comments for Facility: 550 ne of the above ne of the above Wood preservation using creosote: Yes PWB manufacturing List Releases Releases (Speciated VOCs) Disposals Recycling Unit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A kg

3 Releases Releases (Speciated VOCs) Disposals Recycling Unit N/A N/A N/A N/A Applicable Programs NPRI ON MOE TRA ON MOE Reg 127/01 First report for this substance to the ON MOE TRA Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes General Information about the Releases and Transfers of the Was the substance released on site The substance will be reported as the sum of releases to all media (total of 1 tonne or less) 1 tonne or more of a Part 5 (Speciated VOC) was released to air Yes Yes Yes Hydrochloric acid Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes General Information about the Disposals and Off site Transfers for Recycling Was the substance disposed of (on site or offsite), or transferred for treatment prior to final disposal Is the facility required to report on disposals of tailings and waste rock for the selected reporting period Was the substance transferred off site for recycling Copper (and its Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Hydrochloric acid Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes General Information about the Nature of Activities Manufacture the Process the wise Use of the As a reactant As a physical or chemical processing aid As a reactant As an article component As a reactant As a physical or chemical processing aid As a reactant As a physical or chemical processing aid As a reactant As an article component As a reactant As a physical or chemical processing aid As a reactant As a physical or chemical processing aid TRA Quantifications Use, Creation, Contained in Product Quantity Use ranges for public reporting Use Yes

4 Use, Creation, Contained in Product Quantity Use ranges for public reporting Creation 0 Yes Contained in Product 0 Yes Use Yes Creation 0 Yes Contained in Product Yes Use Yes Creation 0 Yes Contained in Product 0 Yes Use Yes Creation 0 Yes Contained in Product 0 Yes Use kg Yes Creation 0 kg Yes Contained in Product kg Yes Use Yes Creation 0 Yes Contained in Product 0 Yes Use Yes Creation 0 Yes Contained in Product 0 Yes TRA Quantifications s in Method of Quantification Reasons for Description of how an Description of how the change impact incident(s) affected tracking and quantification of the substance quantifications Significant Process Copper (and its Hydrochloric acid On site Releases Releases to air Category Basis of Estimate Detail Code Quantity Stack or Point Releases O Engineering Estimates Stack or Point Releases O Engineering Estimates kg Stack or Point Releases O Engineering Estimates On site Releases Releases to air Total Total Releases to Air kg Total Quantity Released (All Media) Category Basis of Estimate Detail Code Quantity Total Quantity Released O Engineering Estimates Total Quantity Released O Engineering Estimates Total Quantity Released O Engineering Estimates On site Releases Total Total releases

5 Total releases kg On site Releases Quarterly Breakdown of Annual Releases Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter On site Releases Reasons for s in Quantities Released from Previous Year Reasons for s in Quantities from Previous Year Comments significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change (specify in On site Releases comment field) Copper not released to air s in production levels (specify in On site Releases comment field) less panels manufactured via HASL process significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change Disposals Off site Transfers (excluding Tailings ) Category Basis of Estimate Detail Code Quantity Chemical Treatment O Engineering Estimates Municipal Sewage Treatment O Engineering Estimates Chemical Treatment O Engineering Estimates Municipal Sewage Treatment O Engineering Estimates Chemical Treatment O Engineering Estimates Municipal Sewage Treatment O Engineering Estimates Chemical Treatment O Engineering Estimates Chemical Treatment O Engineering Estimates kg Municipal Sewage Treatment O Engineering Estimates kg Chemical Treatment O Engineering Estimates Chemical Treatment O Engineering Estimates Disposals Off site Transfers (excluding Tailings ) Total Total Treatment Prior to Final Disposal kg Disposals Off site Transfers (excluding Tailings ) By Facilities Category Off site Off site Address Quantity Chemical Treatment Detox Environmental Ltd. 322 Bennett, Bowmanville, ON, Municipal Sewage Treatment Highland Creek Water Treatment 1160 Highland Creek W., Toronto, ON, Chemical Treatment Detox Environmental Ltd. 322 Bennett, Bowmanville, ON, Chemical Treatment Sure Horizon Environmental 40 Advance Blvd., Berampton, ON, L6T 4J4, Chemical Treatment Detox Environmental Ltd. 322 Bennett, Bowmanville, ON, 21.93

6 Category Off site Off site Address Quantity Chemical Treatment Sure Horizon Environmental 40 Advance Blvd., Berampton, ON, L6T 4J4, 4.39 Chemical Treatment Detox Environmental Ltd. 322 Bennett, Bowmanville, ON, Chemical Treatment Sure Horizon Environmental 40 Advance Blvd., Berampton, ON, L6T 4J4, Chemical Treatment Detox Environmental Ltd. 322 Bennett, Bowmanville, ON, Chemical Treatment Sure Horizon Environmental 40 Advance Blvd., Berampton, ON, L6T 4J4, Municipal Sewage Treatment Highland Creek Water Treatment 1160 Highland Creek W., Toronto, ON, Chemical Treatment Detox Environmental Ltd. 322 Bennett, Bowmanville, ON, kg Chemical Treatment Highland Creek Water Treatment 1160 Highland Creek W., Toronto, ON, Municipal Sewage Treatment Highland Creek Water Treatment 1160 Highland Creek W., Toronto, ON, kg Chemical Treatment Detox Environmental Ltd. 322 Bennett, Bowmanville, ON, Chemical Treatment Sure Horizon Environmental 40 Advance Blvd., Berampton, ON, L6T 4J4, Municipal Sewage Treatment Highland Creek Water Treatment 1160 Highland Creek W., Toronto, ON, Disposals Total Quantity Disposed (All Media) Total Quantity Disposed (All Media) kg Disposals Reasons and Comments Reasons Why Was Disposed Reasons for s in Quantities from Previous Year Comments Contaminated materials significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change.03% from last year Hydrochloric acid Contaminated materials (specify in On site Releases comment field) liters of Cupric chloride was shipped for disposal due to EC EIHW License issue Contaminated materials (specify in On site Releases comment field) Weekly Dump of Acid Copper bath solution from Plating Lines plus PAL 1 changed twice due to contamination issues. Only way determined successful in reducing TOC per process eng. Contaminated materials (specify in On site Releases comment field) New Solder Stripper has higher nitric concentration Copper (and its Production residues Contaminated materials Pollution abatement residues (specify in On site Releases comment field) Treated more microetch in 2016 and Shipped out one load (20090 Liters) of Spent cupric to Sure Horizon, Contaminated materials Pollution abatement residues s in production levels (specify in On site Releases comment field) Shipped out less Spent Flux and Contaminated Rags in 2016 vs 2015 Contaminated materials (specify in On site Releases comment field) Quantity disposed is small, therefore easy to exceed 10% change. Salts is present in new Sn Stripper sent for disposal. Recycling Off site Transfers for Recycling Category Basis of Estimate Detail Code Quantity Recovery of Inorganic Materials (not metals) O Engineering Estimates Recovery of Metals and Metal Compounds O Engineering Estimates Recovery of Inorganic Materials (not metals) O Engineering Estimates Recovery of Metals and Metal Compounds O Engineering Estimates kg

7 Category Basis of Estimate Detail Code Quantity Recycling Off site Transfers for Recycling Total Total Off site Transfers for Recycling kg Recycling Off site Transfers for Recycling By Facility Category Off site Off site Address Quantity Recovery of Inorganic Materials (not metals) Micronutrients 1550 Research Way, Indianapolis, IN, United States Recovery of Metals and Metal Compounds Reldan Metals, LLC 550 Old Bordentown Road,, Fairless Hills, PA, USA Recovery of Metals and Metal Compounds Micronutrients 1550 Research Way, Indianapolis, IN, United States Recovery of Metals and Metal Compounds Combined Metal Industries Inc. 505 B Garyray Dr., Weston, ON, Recovery of Metals and Metal Compounds Combined Metal Industries Inc. 505 B Garyray Dr., Weston, ON, kg Recovery of Inorganic Materials (not metals) Micronutrients 1550 Research Way, Indianapolis, IN, United States Recycling Reasons and Comments Reasons Why Was Recycled Reasons for s in Quantities Recycled from Previous Year Comments (specify in recycling comments field) Formaldehyde not recycled Contaminated materials (specify in recycling comments field) liters of Cupric chloride was shipped for disposal due to EC EIHW License issue (specify in recycling comments field) H2SO4 not being recycled (specify in recycling comments field) Nitric Acid is not recycled Production Residues Contaminated materials Unusable parts or discards Pollution abatement residues Machine or finishing residues significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change Off specification products Contaminated materials Unusable parts or discards s in production levels Contaminated materials significant change (i.e. < 10%) or no change Comparison Report Enters, Creation, Contained in Product Is Breakdown Category Quantity Last Reported Quantity Reporting Period of Last Reported Quantity % Enters the facility (Use) Creation Contained in Product Enters the facility (Use) Creation Contained in Product Enters the facility (Use) Creation Contained in Product Enters the facility (Use) Creation

8 Is Breakdown Category Quantity Last Reported Quantity Contained in Product Reporting Period of Last Reported Quantity % Enters the facility (Use) kg kg Creation 0 kg 0 kg Contained in Product kg kg Enters the facility (Use) Creation Contained in Product Enters the facility (Use) Creation Contained in Product Comparison Report Enters, Creation, Contained in Product : Reason(s) for Copper (and its Reason(s) for Reason reasons quantities approximately the same reasons quantities approximately the same reasons quantities approximately the same Hydrochloric acid Used HCl Tech grade 32% tote in DI system, Did more DI regen in 2016 compared to 2015 due to additional processes connected to the inhouse DI system Decrease in production levels Fewer Panels HASLed Bought more 50% Nitric acid due to increase concentration of Nitric acid nickel tank stripper (From 2 25% % mixture to 2 50% % mixture) and new Sn stripper has higher concn in Nitric Acid. Used less acid regeneration due to improved IX regen efficiency. Comparison Report On site Releases Is Breakdown Category Quantity Last Reported Quantity Reporting Period of Last Reported Quantity % Air Water Land All Media Air 0 Water 0 Land 0 All Media Air 0 Water 0 Land 0 All Media Air kg kg Water 0 kg 0 kg

9 Is Breakdown Category Quantity Last Reported Quantity Land Reporting Period of Last Reported Quantity 0 kg 0 kg % All Media 0 kg Air Water Land All Media Air 0 Water 0 Land 0 All Media Comparison Report On site Releases Reason(s) for Reason(s) for Reason reasons quantities approximately the same reasons quantities approximately the same reasons quantities approximately the same Decrease in production levels Fewer Panels HASLed reasons quantities approximately the same reasons quantities approximately the same Comparison Report Disposals On site, Off site and Tailings Is Breakdown Category Quantity Last Reported Quantity Reporting Period of Last Reported Quantity % Total On site Disposals Total Off site Disposals Total Off site transfer for treatment Prior to Final Disposal Total On site Disposal of Tailings Total Off site Disposal of Tailings Total On site Disposals Total Off site Disposals Total Off site transfer for treatment Prior to Final Disposal Total On site Disposal of Tailings Total Off site Disposal of Tailings Total On site Disposals Total Off site Disposals Total Off site transfer for treatment Prior to Final Disposal Total On site Disposal of Tailings Total Off site Disposal of Tailings Total On site Disposals Total Off site Disposals Total Off site transfer for treatment Prior to Final Disposal Total On site Disposal of Tailings

10 Is Breakdown Category Quantity Last Reported Quantity Total Off site Disposal of Tailings Reporting Period of Last Reported Quantity % Total On site Disposals 0 kg 0 kg Total Off site Disposals 0 kg 0 kg Total Off site transfer for treatment Prior to Final Disposal kg kg Total On site Disposal of Tailings 0 kg 0 kg Total Off site Disposal of Tailings 0 kg 0 kg Total On site Disposals Total Off site Disposals Total Off site transfer for treatment Prior to Final Disposal Total On site Disposal of Tailings Total Off site Disposal of Tailings Total On site Disposals Total Off site Disposals Total Off site transfer for treatment Prior to Final Disposal Total On site Disposal of Tailings Total Off site Disposal of Tailings Comparison Report Disposals On site, Off site and Tailings Reason(s) for Reason(s) for Reason Salts present in new Sn Stripper sent out for disposal Copper (and its Treated more micro etch in house, L of Cupric Etchant was sent out for disposal due to EC EIHW issue reasons quantities approximately the same Hydrochloric acid liters of Cupric chloride was shipped for disposal due to EC EIHW License issue Decrease in production levels Fewer panels HASLed. Shipped out less Flux and contaminated rags in 2016 vs 2015 Bought more 50% Nitric acid due to increase concentration of Nitric acid nickel tank stripper (From 2 25% % mixture to 2 50% % mixture) and new Sn stripper has higher concentration in Nitric Acid. Weekly Dump of Acid Copper bath solution from Plating Lines plus PAL 1 changed twice due to contamination issues. Only way determined successful in reducing TOC per process eng. Comparison Report Transfers off site for Recycling Is Breakdown Category Quantity Last Reported Quantity Reporting Period of Last Reported Quantity % Total off site Transfers for Recycling Total off site Transfers for Recycling Total off site Transfers for Recycling Total off site Transfers for Recycling kg kg Comparison Report Transfers off site for Recycling Reason(s) for Reason(s) for Reason reasons quantities approximately the same shipped one load of cupric for disposal due to EC EIHW issue

11 Reason(s) for Reason liters of Cupric chloride was shipped for disposal due to EC EIHW License issue Decrease in production levels Fewer panels HASLed = 77% recycled Vs = 83% recycled Pollution Prevention Does the facility have a documented pollution prevention plan? a) Please check all that apply b) Did the facility update their plan in the current reporting year? c) Does the plan address substances, energy conservation, or water conservation? Please summarize your pollution prevention plan and/or your pollution prevention activities (this information will be publicly available) Did the facility complete any pollution prevention activities in the current NPRI reporting year Yes Plan was prepared or implemented for another government jurisdiction (i.e. other Federal government department, province, municipality). Specify name in comments field below. s We have an MOE TRA Plan and a City of Toronto P2 Plan Yes Pollution Prevention Activities Category Activity and description of the other activity Equipment or Process Modifications Modified stripping / cleaning devices Good Operating Practice or Training Inventory Management or Purchasing Techniques Materials or feedstock substitution On site Re use, Recycling, or Recovery Pollution Prevention Activities Product Design or Reformulation Spill or Leak Prevention Activities Progress on TRA Plan Objectives Objectives Viasystems intends to reduce NH3 but additional research and testing is required prior to stating any commitment DDi has successfully implemented the toxic reduction option. DDi intends to conduct further research to identify new reduction options DDi intends to reduce HCL but additional research and testing is required prior to the commitment. DDi intends to reduce the use of Lead in the HASL process. Viasystems intends to reduce HNO3 but additional research and testing is required prior to any commitment DDi intends to reduce H2SO4 but additional research and testing is required prior to the commitment Progress on TRA Plan Use Targets Quantity Years Description of Target quantity target timeline target quantity target timeline target quantity target timeline target quantity target timeline target kg 2 Q quantity target timeline target quantity target timeline target Progress on TRA Plan Creation Targets Quantity Years Description of Target quantity target timeline target quantity target timeline target quantity target timeline target

12 Quantity Years Description of Target quantity target timeline target quantity target timeline target quantity target timeline target quantity target timeline target Progress on TRA Plan Toxic Reduction Options Implemented Activity Steps that were taken in the reporting period to implement the toxic reduction option Public summary of the description of the steps Comparison of the steps that were described in the plan for implementation with the actual steps taken during the reporting period Public summary of the comparison of the steps action taken action taken action taken action taken Lead (and its Modified equipment, layout or piping action taken action taken action taken action taken d to aqueous action taken testing initiated action taken testing initiated Initiated testing of outdated material action taken testing initiated action taken testing initiated Instituted recirculation within a process action taken testing initiated action taken testing initiated action taken testing initiated action taken testing initiated Progress on TRA Plan Reductions due to Options Implemented Equipment or process modifications Activity Reductions due to Options Implemented Quantity The amount of reduction in use of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to steps described: The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in use of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to steps described: The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that

13 Progress on TRA Plan Reductions due to Options Implemented Improved inventory management or purchasing techniques Activity Reductions due to Options Implemented Quantity The amount of reduction in use of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the steps described: The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to steps described: The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that Progress on TRA Plan Reductions due to Options Implemented On site reuse, recycling or recovery Activity Reductions due to Options Implemented Quantity The amount of reduction in use of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the steps described: The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to steps described: The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that Progress on TRA Plan Reductions due to Options Implemented Good operator practice or training Activity Reductions due to Options Implemented Quantity steps described: The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the steps described: The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the steps described: The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to steps described: The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that steps described: The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the steps described:

14 Activity Reductions due to Options Implemented Quantity The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the steps described: The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to steps described: The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that Progress on TRA Plan Additional Actions Were there any additional actions outside the plan taken during the reporting period to reduce the use and/or creation of the substance? Describe any additional actions that were taken during the reporting period to achieve the plan's objectives Provide a public summary of the description of the additional action taken Copper (and its Yes Replaced tin stripper with a new product that doesn't attack plated copper aggressively, thereby reducing the need to over plate panels to compensate for this attack. Modified process control of tin stripper, thereby saving copper from attack Hydrochloric acid Progress on TRA Plan Reductions due to additional actions taken Reductions due to additional actions taken Quantity The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due

15 Reductions due to additional actions taken Quantity The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due 0.12 The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due

16 Reductions due to additional actions taken Quantity Annual Report Certification Statement The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in creation of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to the The amount of reduction in the substance contained in product at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to air of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to water of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in release to land of the substance at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due to The amount of reduction in the substance disposed on site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance disposed off site (including tailings and waste rocks) at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due The amount of reduction in the substance recycled off site at the facility during the reporting period that resulted due Progress on TRA Plan Amendments Description any amendments that Were any amendments made to were made to the toxic substance the toxic substance reduction reduction plan during the reporting plan during the reporting period period Provide a public summary of the description of any amendments that were made to the toxic substance reduction plan during the reporting period Copper (and its Hydrochloric acid Report Submission and Electronic Certification NPRI Electronic Statement of Certification Specify the language of correspondence English Comments (optional) I hereby certify that I have exercised due diligence to ensure that the submitted information is true and complete. The amounts and values for the facility(ies) identified below are accurate, based on reasonable estimates using available data. The data for the facility(ies) that I represent are hereby submitted to the programs identified below using the Single Window Reporting Application. I also acknowledge that the data will be made public. te: Only the person identified as the Certifying Official or the authorized delegate should submit the report(s) identified below. Company Viasystems Toronto, Inc. Certifying Official (or authorized delegate) Mark Scruton Report Submitted by Jon Pereira I, the Certifying Official or authorized delegate, agree with the statements above and acknowledge that by pressing the "Submit Report(s)" button, I am electronically certifying and submitting the facility report(s) for the identified company to its affiliated programs. ON MOE TRA Electronic Certification Statement

17 As of 30/05/2017, I, Jon Pereira, certify that I have read the reports on the toxic substance reduction plans for the toxic substances referred to below and am familiar with their contents, and to my knowledge the information contained in the reports is factually accurate and the reports comply with the Toxics Reduction Act, 2009 and Ontario Regulation 455/09 (General) made under that Act. TRA List Company Viasystems Toronto, Inc. Highest Ranking Employee Jon Pereira Report Submitted by Jon Pereira Website address I, the highest ranking employee, agree with the certification statement(s) above and acknowledge that by checking the box I am electronically signing the statement(s). I also acknowledge that by pressing the 'Submit Report(s)' button I am submitting the facility record(s)/report(s) for the identified facility to the Director under the Toxics Reduction Act, I also acknowledge that the Toxics Reduction Act, 2009 and Ontario Regulation 455/09 provide the authority to the Director under the Act to make certain information as specified in subsection 27(5) of Ontario Regulation 455/09 available to the public. Submitted Report Period Submission Date Facility Province City Programs /05/2017 Sheppard Facility Ontario Toronto NPRI,ON MOE TRA te: If there is a change in the contact information for the facility, a change in the owner or operator of the facility, if operations at the facility are terminated, or if information submitted for any previous year was mistaken or inaccurate, please update this information through SWIM or by contacting the National Pollutant Release Inventory directly. Version: Terms and Conditions Transparency About us News Contact us Stay connected.gc.ca HEALTH TRAVEL SERVICE CANADA JOBS ECONOMY healthycanadians.gc.ca Back travel.gc.ca servicecanada.gc.ca jobbank.gc.ca actionplan.gc.ca Validate Save/Continue