CASE NO. 01CW18 RUSSELL

Transcription

1 DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 2, COLORADO RESUME OF CASES FILED DURING MARCH TO: ALL INTERESTED PARTIES Pursuant to C.R.S , you are hereby notified that the following is a resume of applications, and certain amendments, filed during March 2001, in Water Division No. 2. The names and addresses of applicants, description of water rights or conditional water rights involved and description of ruling sought as reflected by said applications, or amendments, are as follows: CASE NO. 01CW18 RUSSELL and CONNIE BENCH and CLIFF LIKES, Wigwam Road, Pueblo, CO Application for Change of Water Rights El Paso County Decreed name of structure for which change is sought: Pinkston Well No. 4 (Permit F); Previous Decree Entered: 6/25/1974 in Case No. W-2452, Water Division 2. Decreed point of diversion: SW ¼ NE ¼ Section 26, T17S, R65W, 6th P.M., El Paso County, Colorado. Source: Underground water; Appropriation Date: 6/30/63; Amount: 2.44 cfs or 1100 gpm; Historic use: Irrigation. Proposed change: Relocate well in SE ¼ SE ¼ Sec. 26, T17S, R65W, 6th P.M., 1050 from south line and 1150 from east line. 5. Names of owners of land on which structure is located: Applicants. (Application and attachments, 6 pages) CASE NO. 01CW19 TOWN OF GRANADA, COLORADO, Attn: Alan Pfeiffer, Mayor and Town Board of Directors, Town Hall, P. O. Box 258, Granada, CO Application for Change of Water Right Prowers County 2. Decreed name of structures for which change is sought: Town of Granada Well Nos. 1, 2, 3, and From previous Decree: A. Date Entered: May 24, 1974; Case No. W-3352; Court: 2. B. Decreed point of diversion: Incorrect locations described in the Decree are as follows: Well No. 1: SE ¼ of NW ¼ of Sec. 13, T. 23 S., R. 44 W. of the 6th P.M., in Prowers County, Colorado; Well No. 2: SE ¼ of NW ¼ of Sec. 13, T. 23S., R. 44 W. of the 6th P.M., in Prowers County, Colorado; Well No. 3: SW ¼ of NE ¼ of Sec. 13, T. 23 S., R. 44 W. of the 6th P.M., in Prowers County, Colorado; Well No. 4: SE ¼ of NE ¼ of Sec. 13, T. 23 S., R. 44 W. of the 6th P.M., in Prowers County, Colorado. C. Source: Dakota Formation. D. Appropriation Date: October 1, 1942; Amount: 200, 200, 350, and 350 gpm for well nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. E. Historic use: Historic use consists of municipal water service to the Town of Granada as shown on map attached to Application and available for inspection at the Office of the Clerk for Water Division No. 2. No change in use is proposed. 4. Proposed change: Requested change consists of 1

2 corrections to locations for the Town of Granada Well Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 as described in District Court Water Division 2 Case No. W3352 Ruling of the Referee dated April 17, 1974 as Adjudicated and Decreed May 24, 1974 by the Court. As such, REVISE Well No. 1 to read: NE ¼ of the NW ¼ of Section 14, Township 23 South, Range 44 West of the 6th P.M., in Prowers County, Colorado, being located approximately 1270 feet South of the North section line and 1650 feet East of the West section line. REVISE Well No. 2 to read: NE ¼ of the NW ¼ of Section 14, Township 23 South, Range 44 West of the 6th P.M., in Prowers County, Colorado, being located approximately 1270 feet South of the North section line and 2600 feet East of the West section line. REVISE Well No. 3 to read: NW ¼ of the NE ¼ of Section 14, Township 23 South, Range 44 West of the 6th P.M., in Prowers County, Colorado, being located approximately 1240 feet South of the North section line and 1650 feet West of the East section line. REVISE Well No. 4 to read: SE ¼ of the NE ¼ of Section 14, Township 23 South, Range 44 West of the 6th P.M., in Prowers County, Colorado, being located approximately 2150 feet South of the North section line and 1050 feet West of the East section line. 5. Name and address of owner of land on which structures are located: Applicant. (Application and attachments, 7 pages) CASE NO. 01CW20 OLD MILL HOLDINGS, LLC, 228 N. Cascade Avenue, Suite 301, Colorado Springs, CO 80903; WIDEFIELD WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT, 37 Widefield Blvd., Security, CO 80911; and FOUNTAIN MUTUAL IRRIGATION COMPANY, 325 Haversham Drive, Colorado Springs, CO (Steven T. Monson, Felt, Monson & Culichia, LLC, Attorneys for Applicant Old Mill Holdings, LLC and Co-Applicant Fountain Mutual Irrigation Company, 319 North Weber Street, Colorado Springs, CO 80903; and M. E. MacDougall, MacDougall, Woldridge & Worley, Attorneys for Co-Applicant Widefield Water and Sanitation District, 530 Communication Circle, Suite 204, Colorado Springs, CO 80905) Application for Change of Water Rights and Plan for Augmentation El Paso County II. APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS A. General Statement of Plan. This Application seeks a change of its water rights for the Higby Well No. 1 and Higby Well No. 2, which were originally decreed in Case No. W-3519, District Court for Water Division 2. The change sought is a change in the type and place of use of the two wells from their decreed irrigation uses upon the historically irrigated property to all types of municipal uses to be made through the water system of Widefield Water and Sanitation District, a Colorado special district ( District ). The depletions from all diversions of these junior wells through the District s water supply system will be augmented through the use of consumptive use credits from shares of Fountain Mutual Irrigation Company ( FMIC ), which consumptive use credits will be committed to Fountain Creek as replacement water through the FMIC Spring Creek augmentation station. The Higby Wells Nos. 1 and 2, water rights, as changed and augmented, are planned to be conveyed by the Applicant to the 2

3 District as part of the Applicant s requirements for inclusion of its land into the District. B. Name of Structures. The names of the structures for which this change of water right is sought are the Higby Well No. 1 and Higby Well No. 2. C. Information from Previous Decree. a. Date entered: Both Higby Wells Nos. 1 and 2 were decreed on June 13, 1975 in Case No. W-3519, District Court for Water Division 2, State of Colorado. b. Decreed Points of Diversion: The decreed location of Higby Well No. 1 is in the NE ¼ SE ¼ of Section 15, Township 15 South, Range 65 West, 6th P.M., El Paso County, Colorado. The decreed location of Higby Well No. 2 is in the NE ¼ SE ¼ of Section 15, Township 15 South, Range 65 West, 6th P.M., El Paso County, Colorado. c. Source: The source of water for both of the Higby Wells is the alluvium of Jimmy Camp Creek, tributary to Fountain Creek, tributary to the Arkansas River. d. Appropriation Dates/Amounts: The appropriation date for Higby Well No. 1 is December 31, The appropriation date for Higby Well No. 2 is December 31, The Higby Wells were decreed for 75 gpm each for the irrigation of 74.7 acres in Section 15, Township 15 South, Range 65 West, 6th P.M. e. Permit No.: Higby Well No. 1 has been issued Well Permit No by the Colorado Division of Water Resources. D. Historical Use. Based upon investigations by the Applicant s engineer, including aerial photographs and interviews with the previous owner, the Higby Well Nos. 1 and 2 were used for the flood irrigation upon approximately 70 to 75 acres of land in Section 15, Township 15 South, Range 65 West, 6th P.M. The average diversions from the two wells during the irrigation season are estimated at 102 annual acre feet. Applying an irrigation efficiency of sixty percent, the Applicant has determined that the net irrigation depletion to the Jimmy Camp Creek and Fountain Creek has historically be 61 annual acre feet. No diversion records are supplied as they have not been maintained by the Division of Water Resources. E. Changes Sought. The Applicants seek to change the 61 annual acre feet of historic consumptive use of the Higby Well Nos. 1 and 2 from irrigation use to use through the District s central water supply system, including uses for domestic, livestock, commercial, industrial, irrigation, fire protection, and municipal use. The new uses will continue to be made from the historic Higby Well Nos. 1 and 2 structures upon the Applicants property, which well structures will be redeveloped and will be connected by pipeline into the District s municipal water supply system. The historic consumptive use of 61 acre feet is to be changed in order that the historic depletion regimen to the Jimmy Camp Creek alluvium is maintained. The place of use for the water rights will be changed from the historically irrigated property to the District s service area within existing District boundaries, future inclusions and extraterritorial areas served by the District. The District s current boundaries are generally described as lying within Sections 7, 15 and 17 through 30 in Township 15 South, Range 65 West, and Sections 13, 24 and 25 in Township 15 South, Range 66 West, 6th P.M., El Paso County, Colorado. The combined diversion rate from the two wells will be 500 gpm. The Higby Wells will no longer be used for irrigation upon the historically irrigated property, except as said water may be used upon this area through the District s municipal water supply system under the plan for augmentation. This 3

4 will constitute effective dry up of the historically irrigated property under the Higby Wells. The Higby Wells are located upon the Applicant s Exhibit A property, and Applicants request the right to relocate the two wells within the boundaries of said property. Exhibit A is on file with the application and may be examined in the Office of the Clerk for Water Division No. 2. As the Higby Well Nos. 1 and 2 constitute junior water rights, the diversions of the wells will be limited to 61 annual acre feet through the District s water system and depletions from all diversions will be fully augmented to Fountain Creek and the Arkansas River as hereinafter set forth in this application. III. PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION A. Name of Structures to be Augmented. The structures to be augmented are the Higby Well Nos. 1 and 2 as set forth in Section II of this Application. B. Water Rights to be Used for Augmentation. The water rights to be used for augmentation are 40 shares of FMIC to be acquired by the Applicants ( Applicants Shares ). FMIC diverts its water to the Fountain Mutual Ditch from Fountain Creek, tributary to the Arkansas River, at its headgate located in the SW ¼, Section 20, Township 14 South, Range 66 West, 6th P.M. FMIC s water rights were originally decreed for irrigation purposes. FMIC water rights are decreed as follows: DIRECT FLOW Fountain Creek Total Decree Priority No. Priority Date Decree Date (cfs) 4 9/21/1861 3/6/ (5.38) 1 7 4/1/1862 3/6/ /1/1863 3/6/ /31/1863 3/6/ (2.125) /31/1864 3/6/ /31/1866 3/6/ /31/1867 3/6/ /21/1874 3/6/ /31/1903 6/2/ STORAGE Fountain Creek Total Decree Priority No. Priority Date Decree Date (AF) Fountain 3/18/1903 6/2/ ,000 1 FMIC s interest in Priority No. 4 is 5.38 cfs. The amount of 1.73 cfs was changed on application of Security Water District in Case No. 90CW28. In addition to the 5.38 cfs, FMIC claims the right to divert any of the remaining 2.73 cfs decreed to this priority which is not used by the other owners thereof. 2 Priority No. 17 is referred to as the Janitell s right and FMIC has used ½ of the water, or cfs, in return for the carriage of the other cfs to its owner through the FMIC ditch. By Decree Authorizing Change in Point of Diversion in Civil Action No , entered July 29, 1959, the point of diversion for the 4.25 cfs of Priority No. 17 of the Laughlin Ditch was changed to the headgate of the Fountain Mutual Ditch. 4

5 C. Historic Use. FMIC water rights have been decreed for use in numerous other changes of water rights and plans of augmentation. In those previous cases, this court has determined that each share of FMIC has historically yielded on the average the equivalent of 0.7 acre feet of net replacement or consumptive use water each year, which number represents a portion of the farm headgate delivery. These findings have been previously established by this court, without limitation, in the decrees in Case Nos. 90CW28, 95CW3, 90CW7 (entered November 13, 2000), and 99CW146 (entered November 15, 2000), Water Division 2. The replacement or augmentation credit allowed to FMIC water rights, as also determined in prior cases, is a percentage of the FMIC actual delivery to its shareholders computed on the basis of the following table. FMIC REPLACEMENT CREDIT Replacement Credit as a Percentage Month of Farm Headgate Delivery January 47 February 58 March 70 April 70 May 70 June 70 July 72 August 72 September 74 October 66 November 40 December 49 This historic consumptive use of FMIC shares was recently affirmed in Case No. 95CW3, which findings are binding as a matter of res judicata. Williams v. Midway Ranches Property Owners Association, Inc., 938 P.2d 515 (Colo. 1997). This same historic consumptive use was most recently affirmed in Case Nos. 90CW7 and 99CW146 decreed on November 13, 2000 and November 15, 2000, respectively. There have been no material changed circumstances since this last decree to modify these historic consumptive use determinations. Applicants request that the court find that each FMIC share has historically yielded on the average the equivalent of 0.7 acre feet of net replacement or consumptive use water each year, which number represents a portion of farm headgate delivery. For the 40 shares, this represents an average consumptive use of 28 annual acre feet which may be used for replacement water. The total amount of consumptive use under the FMIC water rights varies from year to year based upon the amount of water available for diversion under those rights. Therefore, the actual consumptive use available from such shares shall be based on actual in-priority diversions applied to the above monthly replacement credits schedule. As Applicant relies upon these prior determinations, diversion records and a map are not submitted. D. Statement of Plan for Supplemental Augmentation. The consumptive use attributable to Applicants Shares of FMIC shall be committed to this plan of augmentation to replace the out of priority historic 5

6 depletions associated with the Higby Well Nos. 1 and 2. The Applicants engineer has determined that diversions through the District s water system are forty five percent depletive to Fountain Creek on a system wide basis. Therefore, the 61 annual acre feet of diversions through Higby Well Nos. 1 and 2 will cause depletions to Fountain Creek of annual acre feet. These depletions will be covered by the 28 annual acre feet of replacement water from the 40 Applicants Shares of FMIC. The augmented wells can be used in any combination of the above decreed uses for properties within the District s municipal service area, as previously identified, provided the depletions from the wells do not exceed the maximum consumptive use attributable to FMIC Shares committed to this plan. Water available under Applicants FMIC shares will be diverted at the headgate of the Fountain Mutual Ditch and released back to Fountain Creek at the Spring Creek Augmentation Station, and Applicant will contract with FMIC for the use of the augmentation station. The replacement credits under this plan for FMIC shares will be computed as a percentage of actual FMIC in priority diversions applied to the above monthly replacement credit schedule. Depletions from the Higby Well Nos. 1 and 2 to Jimmy Camp Creek will be calculated monthly by Glover analyses, with the release of replacement water from the FMIC water rights being made to replace those monthly depletions. Applicant requests the right to redrill the two wells upon its property with a new Glover analysis ran for any well redrilled more than 200 feet from the prior location. Excess conumptive use credits from FMIC Shares dedicated for augmentation purposes will be stored in Applicant s share of the storage space in Big Johnson Reservoir owned by FMIC. Those excess credits stored in Big Johnson Reservoir are to be used for an intraditch exchange during any month in which Applicant s deliveries of water to the Spring Creek augmentation station may be inadequate. The intraditch exchange from Big Johnson Reservoir to the Spring Creek augmentation station will operate at any time FMIC is diverting water, except when both (a) Big Johnson Reservoir is full, and (b) the date is between November 15 and March 15. Applicant s FMIC water rights as changed herein for augmentation purposes will be permanently removed from their historical use for irrigation and the historically irrigated property will no longer be irrigated at such time as these shares are committed to meet depletions under this plan of augmentation. Until so used in this plan of augmentation, such FMIC shares may be continued to be used through the Fountain Mutual Ditch in accordance with the terms of its decrees. Once shares have been dedicated to this pln for replacement purposes, those shares will not be used for other purposes absent a new water court application. The Fountain Mutual system is a water short system, and the withdrawal of water deliveries under the Fountain Mutual Ditch to lands under the FMIC system results in naturally reduced irrigation and the dry up of property. No dry up covenant of Fountain Mutual lands is therefore required for shares committed to this plan of augmentation. Williams v. Midway Ranches Property Owners Association, Inc., 938 P.2d 515 (Colo 1997). E. Name and Address of Owner of Land Upon Which Structures Are Located: The Higby Well Nos. 1 and 2 are located upon land owned by the Applicant set forth above. F. Terms and Conditions. Applicants propose the following 6

7 additional terms and conditions to prevent injury to other vested water rights by this application: 1. A totalizing flow meter will be installed on Higby Well Nos. 1 and 2 to allow accurate monitoring of this augmentation plan, as amended hereby. 2. Monthly accountings shall be made to the Division Engineer demonstrating compliance with this plan for each well, including diversions for each well, total stream depletions, available augmentation water credit and any intraditch exchange. Augmentation water available under the Applicants FMIC Shares and measured through the augmentation station shall always equal or exceed the out of priority depletions of the wells. 3. Applicant shall measure and account for its entitlement under its FMIC shares through use of the FMIC Spring Creek augmentation station. 4. The Division Engineer shall assess appropriate transit losses, if any. 5. Only that amount of water actually available and attributable to Applicants Shares of FMIC stock will be made available for purposes of this amended augmentation plan. 6. Applicants will curtail their well diversions as required by this decree and directed by the Division Engineer if the available water directly attributable to Applicant s Shares of FMIC stock is not sufficient to fully augment the depletions under this plan. WHEREFORE, the Applicants request that this Application for Change of Water Rights and Plan for Augmentation be granted as requested herein, and for such other and further relief as the court deems appropriate in these circumstances. (Application, 9 pages) CASE NO. 01CW21 JAMES D. HULL, 2924 Country Club Drive, Colorado Springs, CO and BEVERLEY B. MILLER, P. O. Box 567, Palmer Lake, CO (Henry D. Worley, MacDougall, Woldridge & Worley, Attorneys for Applicants, 530 Communication Circle, Suite 204, Colorado Springs, CO ) Application for Adjudication of Denver Basin Ground Water and for Approval of Plan for Augmentation and Amended Application for Adjudication of Denver Basin Ground Water and for Approval of Plan for Augmentation El Paso County I. APPLICATION FOR DENVER BASIN WATER RIGHTS 1. Beverley B. Miller is the owner of 50 acres of land beneath which the Denver Basin water is sought to be adjudicated as depicted on Figure 1 attached to the Application, the legal description for which is attached as Exhibit A to the Application (the Property) (Figure 1 and Exhibit A are on file with the Application and may be examined in the Office of the Clerk for Water Division No. 2); James D. Hull is the contract purchaser of the Property. This application will be supplemented with a survey or metes and bounds legal description of the Property when one is available. Upon the closing of the contract to purchase the Property, Beverley B. Miller will withdraw as a co-applicant in this water rights case. 2. Names of wells and permit, registration, or denial numbers: none. 3. Legal description of wells: at any location on the Property. 4. Source: Not nontributary Dawson aquifer; not nontributary Denver aquifer; not nontributary Arapahoe aquifer; nontributary Arapahoe aquifer, and nontributary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer. 5. A. Date of appropriation: Not applicable. 5.B. 7

8 How appropriation was initiated: Not applicable. 5.C. Date water applied to beneficial use: Not applicable. 6. Amount claimed: Not nontributary Dawson aquifer, 15 g.p.m., 2.0 acre feet annually, absolute; not nontributary Denver aquifer, 15 g.p.m., 20.4 acre feet annually, absolute; not nontributary Arapahoe aquifer, 250 g.p.m., 17.6 acre feet annually, absolute; nontributary Arapahoe aquifer, 250 gpm, 11.7 acre feet annually, absolute; Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer, 150 gpm, 13.5 acre feet annually, absolute. The above amounts will be changed in any proposed decree submitted to the Court for signature to conform to the State Engineer's Determination of Facts. The water court will be asked to retain jurisdiction over such decree to enter a final determination of the amount of water available for appropriation from each aquifer based on geophysical logs for such wells. 7. Proposed use: All beneficial uses including augmentation and exchange. 8. Name and address of owner of land on which well is located:. Beverley B. Miller, address noted above. 9. Remarks: Applicants have mailed a copy of this application by registered mail, return receipt requested, to People s National Bank, 624 Hwy. 105, Monument, CO in compliance with the notice provisions of C.R.S (4)(b.5). There are no other liens or encumbrances against the property of which the Applicants are aware. A copy of the letter to People s National Bank is submitted with this application. II. APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION 10. Name, address, telephone number of applicant: James D. Hull, 2924 Country Club Drive, Colorado Springs, CO 80909, phone ; Beverley B. Miller, P.O. Box 567, Palmer Lake, CO 80133, phone Name of structures to be augmented: Up to fourteen Denver aquifer wells. No other water rights are or will be diverted from these wells. 12. Previous decrees for water rights to be used for augmentation: None. 13. Historic use: Not applicable. 14. Statement of plan for augmentation: A. Water Demand. Applicant plans to subdivide the Property into 14 lots for single family residences, with up to 3500 square feet of landscape irrigation per lot, and up to two horses, or their water-consuming equivalents, per lot. Indoor water usage is estimated to require 0.27 acre feet per lot. Demand for horses, based on 10 gallons per horse per day, will be acre feet annually per lot. Water usage for irrigation, based on 2.25 acre feet per acre, will be 0.18 acre feet annually. Based on these limitations, annual water demand per lot will be somewhat less than the acre feet Applicants plan to allocate to each lot; water demand for the 14 lot subdivision will not exceed 6.8 acre feet annually. B. Water Consumption and Return Flows. It is generally accepted that no more than ten percent of water used indoors in residences using septic systems and leach fields for wastewater disposal is consumed, with 90 percent returning to the stream system. Water used for livestock watering is considered to be 100 percent consumed. It is generally accepted that no more than 85 percent of water used for landscape irrigation is consumed. Assuming that the full demand for water (0.47 acre feet) is used on each lot every year, annual return flows will equal approximately 3.8 acre feet. 8

9 C. Replacement of Stream Depletions During Pumping. Based on computer modeling, virtually all stream depletions will occur to Monument Creek, a tributary of the Arkansas River. The computer model indicates that, based on pumping of 7.0 acre feet annually, stream depletions will gradually increase to 33 percent of average annual pumping, or 2.24 acre feet, in the 300 th year Applicants propose to replace those depletions with septic system and landscape irrigation return flows, which, at 3.8 acre feet annually, will significantly exceed stream depletions. D. Replacement of Stream Depletions After Cessation of Pumping. Post-pumping depletions will equal 33 percent of average annual pumping at the cessation of pumping, and will gradually decline thereafter. Applicants will reserve a combined total of 2040 acre feet of the water in the nontributary Arapahoe and Laramie-Fox Hills aquifers for the replacement of post-pumping depletions. E. Miscellaneous. Applicants will establish restrictive covenants on the Property which: restrict pumping to no more than acre per lot annually; require the use of non-evaporative septic systems or a central wastewater disposal system for wastewater treatment; reserve the nontributary Arapahoe and Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer water for replacement of post-pumping depletions, unless some other source of replacement water is approved in a subsequent judicial proceeding or unless the obligation terminates for some other reason; and which inform the future homeowners of the possibility that they will be required to construct a well or wells into the nontributary Arapahoe and Laramie-Fox Hills aquifers for replacement of post-pumping depletions. Restrictive covenants limiting the area to be irrigated or the number of horses, or their water-consuming equivalents, to be watered, are unnecessary for purposes of this application because the limitation to acre feet annually per lot ensures that return flows will exceed depletions during the 300 year pumping period. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR ADJUDICATION OF DENVER BASIN GROUND WATER AND FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION This amended application is submitted as a matter of right pursuant to C.R.Civ.P. Rule 15(a) because no responsive pleadings have been filed. This amended application changes the original application only in the following regards: Applicants seek to construct up to 15 wells in the Denver aquifer, rather than 14. Pumping from each Denver aquifer well will be limited to 0.45 acre feet per year, rather than This change causes very minor differences in some of the arithmetical calculations present in the initial application, but does not change the amount or timing of stream depletions, and actually increases slightly the amount of annual return flows during the pumping period. (Application and attachments, 7 pages; Amended Application, 1 page) THE WATER RIGHTS CLAIMED BY THE FOREGOING APPLICATION(S) MAY AFFECT IN PRIORITY ANY WATER RIGHTS CLAIMED OR HERETOFORE ADJUDICATED WITHIN THIS DIVISION AND OWNERS OF AFFECTED RIGHTS MUST APPEAR TO OBJECT AND PROTEST WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED BY STATUTE, OR BE FOREVER BARRED. 9

10 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any party who wishes to oppose an application, or application as amended, may file with the Water Clerk a verified statement of opposition setting forth facts as to why the application should not be granted, or why it should be granted only in part or on certain conditions, such statement of opposition must be filed by the last day of May 2001, (forms available at Clerk s office, must be submitted in quadruplicate, after serving parties and attaching a certificate of mailing, filing fee $45.00). The foregoing are resumes and the entire application, amendments, exhibits, maps and any other attachments filed in each case may be examined in the office of the Clerk for Water Division No. 2, at the address shown below Witness my hand and the seal of this Court this day of April, (Court seal) Published: April, 2001 Mardell R. Cline, Clerk District Court Water Div Judicial Bldg., 320 W. 10th Street Pueblo, CO Tel