INNER MONGOLIA HANGJIN YIHEWUSU WIND POWER PROJECT

Transcription

1 INNER MONGOLIA HANGJIN YIHEWUSU WIND POWER PROJECT Document Prepared By Inner Mongolia Xinjin Wind Power Co., Ltd. Project Title Inner Mongolia Hangjin Yihewusu Wind Power Project Version 2.0 Report ID Date of Issue 26/02/2013 Project ID CDM Registration Number: 3936 Monitoring Period Prepared By Contact 14/03/2008 to17/12/2010 Inner Mongolia Xinjin Wind Power Co., Ltd. Opera 67, 1507VH, Zaandam, Netherlands Contact Name: Nancy Chen Telephone:

2 Table of Contents 1 Project Details Summary Description of Project Sectoral Scope and Project Type Project Proponent Other Entities Involved in the Project Project Start Date Project Crediting Period Project Location Title and Reference of Methodology Implementation Status Implementation Status of the Project Activity Project Description Deviations Grouped Project Data and Parameters Data and Parameters Available at Validation Data and Parameters Monitored Description of the Monitoring Plan Quantification of GHG Emission Reductions and Removals Baseline Emissions Project Emissions Leakage Summary of GHG Emission Reductions and Removals Additional Information

3 1 PROJECT DETAILS 1.1 Summary Description of Project Inner Mongolian Hangjin Yihewusu Wind Power Project (hereafter referred as the proposed project) is a grid connected renewable energy project developed by Inner Mongolia Xinjin Wind Power Co., Ltd. The proposed project is to be located in Hangjin County, Eerduosi City, West Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Totally 66 wind turbines with a nominal capacity of Goldwind 750 KW have been installed, providing a total capacity of 49.5 MW. With an average annual output of 105,450MWh, the proposed project will achieve CO 2 emission reduction by replacing electricity generated by fossil fuel fired power plant connected into North China Power Grid. The proposed project is estimated to deliver 113,411 tonnes CO 2 emission reduction annually. The wind turbines have been put into operation on 14/03/2008. This monitoring period of the Project is from 14/03/2008 to 17/12/2010. The total emission reduction of this monitoring period is 282,087 tco 2 e. 1.2 Sectoral Scope and Project Type Sectoral scope: 1. Energy (renewable/non-renewable); Project type: Wind power project; The project is not a grouped project. 1.3 Project Proponent Role/ Responsibility: Organization: Address: Contact name: Project Owner Inner Mongolia Xinjin Wind Power Co., Ltd. C Building in Shengli Residential Quarter, Shengli South Road, Xini Town, Hangjin County, Eerduosi City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. of China, WANG Zheng Tel: @qq.com 1.4 Other Entities Involved in the Project No other entities. 1.5 Project Start Date The project started operation on 14/03/ Project Crediting Period The project crediting period is from 18/12/2010 to 17/12/

4 1.7 Project Location The project is located in Hangjin County, Eerduosi City, West Inner Mongolia of China. Its diagonal geographical coordinates are Longitude , Latitude Title and Reference of Methodology Title: Approved consolidated baseline and monitoring methodology ACM0002 Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources - ACM 0002 Version 11 Reference: The methodology also refers to the latest approved versions of the following tools: Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system (version 02); Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality (version05.2); 2 IMPLEMENTATION STATUS 2.1 Implementation Status of the Project Activity All of the wind turbines of the project have been put into operation on 14/03/2008. The electricity generated by the project is delivered to NCPG. There are no events or situations that occurred during the monitoring period which may impact the applicability of methodology. Totally 66 Goldwind 750kW wind turbines with a nominal capacity of 750 kw will be installed, providing a total capacity of 49.5MW. All wind turbines are produced by Goldwind Science & Technology Co., LTD. of China. The main technical information of wind turbines adopted by the proposed project is as follows: Diameter 50 m Swept Area m 2 Rotate speed 21.7 rpm Number of blades 3 Rated wind speed 14 m/s Cut-in wind speed 3.5 m/s Cut-out wind speed 25 m/s Survival wind speed 70 m/s Hub height 65 m Lifetime of the wind turbine 20 years There have been no emergencies happened to the monitoring system. There are no special events, such as overhaul times, downtimes of equipment and exchange of equipment during the monitoring period. 2.2 Project Description Deviations Not Applicable. 4

5 2.3 Grouped Project Not Applicable. 3 DATA AND PARAMETERS 3.1 Data and Parameters Available at Validation Data Unit / Parameter: EF grid,cm,y Data unit: tco 2 e/mwh Description: Combined margin CO 2 emission factor for the project electricity system in year y Source of data: China Electric Power Yearbook China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2006 IPCC 2006 default values Value applied: Purpose of the data: Any comment: - Baseline calculation 3.2 Data and Parameters Monitored Data Unit / Parameter: Data unit: Description: Source of data: Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied: Frequency of monitoring/recording: EG facility,y MWh Value monitored: 262, Quantity of Net electricity supplied by the project activity to the grid during the year y Measured from the on-site monitoring meters and verified against sales data. The meter measuring continuously. Then calculate the net electricity generation supplied by the project to the grid. Continuously measured and monthly recorded Monitoring equipment: Please see the Table QA/QC procedures to be applied: 1. Proportion of the monitored data is 100%. 2. The data was archived electronically and confirmed by the receipt records. 3. The data would be kept during the crediting period and two years later. 4. The meter were calibrated annually by a qualified calibration organization. 5. Sale receipts were used for check against to ensure the consistency. Calculation method: The net power output supplied to the grid is measured continuously and recorded monthly. The accuracy of the meters is 0.2S. Any comment: - 5

6 Table Monitoring Equipment Meter ID Serial Number Accuracy Class Calibration Date Validity Calibration Entity Key Meter Check Meter S S 3.3 Description of the Monitoring Plan 14/12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/ /12/2010 Yes Yes Energy Measurement center of Inner Mongolia Electric Power Research Institute The implementation of Management Structure of the project is consistent with the registered PDD. Roles and responsibilities Inner Mongolia Xinjin Wind Power Co., Ltd. is overall responsibility for monitoring and carries out the monitoring following this monitoring plan.the CDM manager of Inner Mongolia Xinjin Wind Power Co., Ltd. is responsible for the monitoring and reporting of the wind farm. Organizational structure The management structure is illustrated as follows: General Manager CDM Department Manager of monitor Site Engineer Figure 3.1 Organizational structure of the VSC management The general manager makes the overall policy decision while the CDM department is responsible for the concrete implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The monitor manager is responsible for supervising and checking the whole date record process and the calibration of meters. Another main task of the monitor manager is facilitating the verification through providing the DOE with all required necessary information. The site engineer will collect monitoring data (e.g. electric meter data) and keep receipt of sales, etc. Project monitoring system 6

7 The monitoring points for the project activity are shown in Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2 Monitoring Points for the Project Electricity delivered to the grid by the project activity in year y. The electricity metering equipment is properly configured and the metering equipment is calibrated according to the national standard annually. Data collection procedures Both the project owner and Power Grid Company are responsible for the operation of the meters to ensure that the meter is in good conditions and the net electricity supplied to the grid could be valid and be able to achieve emission reductions calculation. Under such circumstances, the specific steps for data collection and reporting are listed below: 1) Project owner will read the meters involved in the figure on a fixed day of every month; 2) Power Grid will read the meters involved in the figure on a same day of every month; 3) Power Grid Company will records the data and supplies readings to the project owner and provides relevant documents (receipt of sales). And, the sales receipt of electricity export to the grid and imported from the grid would be recorded at 0:00 of the first day of each month. Emergency procedures for the monitoring system: Problem occurred in monitoring and measurement process will be recorded and reported to Manager of monitor. Consequently, the corrective resolution will be adopted to deal with that problem and to avoid it occur again in future. There is no any error during this monitoring period. QA/QC procedures 7

8 The quality assurance and quality control procedures for recording, maintaining and archiving data shall be improved as part of this CDM project activity. This is an on-going process that should be ensured through the CDM in terms of the need for verification of the emissions. Monitoring manual should be established before registration. 4 QUANTIFICATION OF GHG EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND REMOVALS 4.1 Baseline Emissions As per the methodology ACM0002, baseline emissions include only CO 2 emissions from electricity generation in the NCPG that the project is connected to. The baseline emissions are to be calculated as follows: BE y =EG facility,y EF grid,cm,y Where: BE y EG facility,y EF grid,cm,y is the baseline emissions in year y (tco 2 e); is the quantity of net electricity generation that is produced and fed into the grid as a result of the implementation of the project activity in year y (MWh); is the combined margin CO 2 emission factor for grid connected power generation in year y calculated using the latest version of the Tool to Calculate the Emission Factor for an Electricity System (tco 2 e/mwh). EG facility, y=eg export, y EG import, y The calculation of net electricity supplied to the grid is presented in Table 4-1~Table 4-3. Table 4 1 EG export, y (KWh) Monthly Recording Electricity Sales Monitoring period Data Receipts Value A B C=MIN(A,B) 14/03/ /03/2008 7,537,904 10,298,200 7,537,904 01/04/ /04/2008 9,705,168 9,705,168 9,705,168 01/05/ /05/2008 9,174,440 9,174,440 9,174,440 01/06/ /06/2008 6,454,360 6,454,360 6,454,360 01/07/ /07/2008 7,737,400 7,737,400 7,737,400 01/08/ /08/2008 7,112,072 7,112,072 7,112,072 01/09/ /09/2008 7,094,824 7,094,824 7,094,824 01/10/ /10/2008 9,385,816 9,385,816 9,385,816 01/11/ /11/ ,248,664 13,248,664 13,248,664 01/12/ /12/ ,022,448 14,022,448 14,022,448 01/01/ /01/2009 9,346,744 9,346,744 9,346,744 01/02/ /02/2009 7,161,704 7,161,704 7,161,704 01/03/ /03/2009 7,620,624 7,620,624 7,620,624 01/04/ /04/2009 8,112,016 8,112,016 8,112,016 01/05/ /05/ ,359,512 12,359,512 12,359,512 8

9 01/06/ /06/2009 7,788,088 7,788,088 7,788,088 01/07/ /07/2009 5,538,280 5,538,280 5,538,280 01/08/ /08/2009 5,799,640 5,799,640 5,799,640 01/09/ /09/2009 6,056,688 6,056,688 6,056,688 01/10/ /10/2009 8,811,968 8,811,968 8,811,968 01/11/ /11/2009 8,104,800 8,104,800 8,104,800 01/12/ /12/2009 8,230,464 8,230,464 8,230,464 01/01/ /01/2010 6,776,528 6,776,528 6,776,528 01/02/ /02/2010 5,120,808 5,120,808 5,120,808 01/03/ /03/ ,361,824 10,361,824 10,361,824 01/04/ /04/ ,693,408 10,693,408 10,693,408 01/05/ /05/ ,143,176 11,143,176 11,143,176 01/06/ /06/2010 6,706,392 6,706,392 6,706,392 01/07/ /07/2010 5,079,096 5,079,096 5,079,096 01/08/ /08/2010 2,981,000 2,981,000 2,981,000 01/09/ /09/2010 3,094,960 3,094,960 3,094,960 01/10/ /10/2010 5,850,064 5,850,064 5,850,064 01/11/ /11/2010 9,802,056 9,802,056 9,802,056 01/12/ /12/2010 3,508,384 9,647,880 3,508,384 Table 4 2 EG import, y (KWh) Monthly Recording Electricity Sales Monitoring period Data Receipts Value D E F=MAX(D,E) 14/03/ /03/ ,648 67,056 67,056 01/04/ /04/ ,936 34,936 34,936 01/05/ /05/ ,784 36,784 36,784 01/06/ /06/ ,608 47,608 47,608 01/07/ /07/ ,304 40,304 40,304 01/08/ /08/ ,680 42,680 42,680 01/09/ /09/ ,992 35,992 35,992 01/10/ /10/ ,272 41,272 41,272 01/11/ /11/ ,072 28,072 28,072 01/12/ /12/ ,808 60,808 60,808 01/01/ /01/ , , ,592 01/02/ /02/ ,280 82,280 82,280 01/03/ /03/ ,432 58,432 58,432 01/04/ /04/ ,712 41,712 41,712 01/05/ /05/ ,936 34,936 34,936 01/06/ /06/ /07/ /07/ ,328 31,328 31,328 01/08/ /08/ ,616 44,616 44,616 01/09/ /09/ ,824 43,824 43,824 01/10/ /10/ ,896 49,896 49,896 9

10 01/11/ /11/ ,912 54,912 54,912 01/12/ /12/ ,584 78,584 78,584 01/01/ /01/ , , ,520 01/02/ /02/ ,856 64,856 64,856 01/03/ /03/ ,016 38,016 38,016 01/04/ /04/ ,792 55,792 55,792 01/05/ /05/ , , ,344 01/06/ /06/ , , ,816 01/07/ /07/ , , ,216 01/08/ /08/2010 1,838,848 1,838,848 1,838,848 01/09/ /09/ , , ,680 01/10/ /10/ ,360 63,360 63,360 01/11/ /11/ ,944 64,944 64,944 01/12/ /12/ ,504 94,952 94,952 Table 4 3 EG facility, y (MWh) Monitoring period EG export, y EG import, y Value G H I=G-H 14/03/ /03/2008 7, , /04/ /04/2008 9, , /05/ /05/2008 9, , /06/ /06/2008 6, , /07/ /07/2008 7, , /08/ /08/2008 7, , /09/ /09/2008 7, , /10/ /10/2008 9, , /11/ /11/ , , /12/ /12/ , , Subtotal of /03/ /12/ , , /01/ /01/2009 9, , /02/ /02/2009 7, , /03/ /03/2009 7, , /04/ /04/2009 8, , /05/ /05/ , , /06/ /06/2009 7, , /07/ /07/2009 5, , /08/ /08/2009 5, , /09/ /09/2009 6, , /10/ /10/2009 8, ,

11 01/11/ /11/2009 8, , /12/ /12/2009 8, , Subtotal of , , /01/ /12/ /01/ /01/2010 6, , /02/ /02/2010 5, , /03/ /03/ , , /04/ /04/ , , /05/ /05/ , , /06/ /06/2010 6, , /07/ /07/2010 5, , /08/ /08/2010 2, , , /09/ /09/2010 3, , /10/ /10/2010 5, , /11/ /11/2010 9, , /12/ /12/2010 3, , Subtotal of /01/ /12/ , , , The baseline emissions of the Project are calculated as: Year 2008 (14/03/ /12/2008): BE 2008 = EF grid,cm,y EG facility,2008 = tco 2 e/mwh* 91, MWh = 97,911 tco 2 e Year 2009 (01/01/ /12/2009): BE 2009 = EF grid,cm,y EG facility,2009 = tco 2 e/mwh* 94, MWh = 101,421 tco 2 e Year 2010 (01/01/ /12/2010): BE 2010 = EF grid,cm,y EG facility,2010 = tco 2 e/mwh* 76, MWh = 82,755 tco 2 e Total: (14/03/ /12/2010): BE total =BE BE BE 2010 =282,087 tco 2 e 4.2 Project Emissions According to ACM0002. (Version 11), as for wind power project, the project emissions are zero. PE y =0 4.3 Leakage According to ACM0002. (Version 11), the leakage of the project is not considered. So, leakage emission is zero. LE y =0 11

12 4.4 Summary of GHG Emission Reductions and Removals The total Emission Reduction (ER y ) during this monitoring period is calculated as follow: Time Period Baseline emissions or baseline net GHG removals by sinks (tco 2 e) Project emissions or actual net GHG removals by sinks (tco 2 e) Leakage (tco 2 e) Emission reductions or net anthropogenic GHG removals by sinks (tco 2 e) A B C D=A-B-C 14/03/ /12/ , ,911 01/01/ /12/ , ,421 14/03/ /12/ , ,755 Total 282, ,087 5 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The total emission reduction during this monitoring period is 282,087 tco 2 e. According to the registered PDD on UNFCCC website, the annual emission reduction of this project is 113,411 tco 2 e. As the length of the monitoring period is 1008 days, the calculated annual emission reduction during this period should be 313,200 tco 2 e. The actual values achieved during this monitoring period accounts 90.07% of the values estimated in ex-ante calculation of the registered PDD due to the power generation fluctuation during the monitoring period. There is no any significantly increase compared with the estimated emission reduction in the registered PDD. So the emission reduction during this monitoring period is reasonable and acceptable. 12