M8 J E L Š A N E - K A L C E

Transcription

1 M8 J E L Š A N E - K A L C E *** Please send the completed questionnaire to ENER-B1-PROJECTS@ec.europa.eu and specify the priority corridor in the subject line *** Information on the project promoters (repeat table for each promoter) 1 Company Type of company Contact person address Available options* / Defined Format Plinovodi d.o.o. o TSO Franc Šefman, Franc Žlahtič, Tomaž Petriček 1) franc.sefman@plinovodi.si 2) franc.zlahtic@plinovodi.si 3) tomaz.petricek@plinovodi.si Telephone number 1) ) ) General Information Type of project Status Project included in the 2011 TYNDP Priority level in national energy policy by 2020 Location of the project (country, region, closest city) and graphical representation on the map Available options* / Defined Format o Pipeline o New o No o Medium 1 Project promoter is defined in Article 2.5 of the draft Regulation COM (2011) 658 of 'projectpromoter' means: a) transmission system operator or distribution system operator or other operator or investor developing a project of common interest; or b) if there are several transmission system operators, distribution system operators, other operators, investors, or any group thereof, the entity with legal personality under the applicable national law, which has been designated by contractual arrangement between them and which has the capacity to undertake legal obligations and assume financial liability on behalf of the parties to the contractual arrangement. 1

2 Expected costs 128 (in 10 6 ) Name of the sponsors and their shares Situation per 31. July 2012: Plinovodi d.o.o. 99,7 % / TEN-E 0,3% On the territory of Croatia this project continues with the project submitted by Croatian TSO Plinacro (reference to the project G69 LNG evacuation pipelines Omišalj-Zlobin-Rupa) Name of the project operator under commercial operation Link to the project website / webpage** Plinovodi d.o.o. in Slovenia Plinacro in Croatia ** Besides the link specified above, sponsors may provide with links to relevant websites Technical Information Available options* / Defined Format*** For Pipeline projects (incl. compressor stations) Route type Length of the pipe Diameter o Onshore 51 km (in km) up to 1200 (in mm) Power of the compressor station(s) - Expected load factor 2 80 (in %) Off-take points (location, annual volumes) 3 (in 10 9 Nm³/y) Ilirska Bistrica; 0,003 Pivka; 0,002 Postojna; 0,003 Daily Capacity 37,11 (in 10 6 Nm³/d) 4 Interconnection Point capacity 1 From Croatia to Slovenia IP Jelšane (Forward) 2 This indicative information will not be used for modelling purposes. It is defined as the percentage of capacity of gas pipeline that is utilized in a period of 3 years after commissioning based on the sponsor's estimates. 3 For import pipelines only. This indicative information will not be used for modelling purposes 4 In normal million cubic meters per day 2

3 37,11 (in 10 6 Nm 3 /d) From Slovenia to Croatia IP Jelšane (Reverse) 37,11 (in 10 6 Nm 3 /d) For all projects Interconnections with other existing and planned gas infrastructures Type of TPA regime Have you applied for an exemption from Third Party Access? Have you applied for an exemption on the tariff regime? Existing: no connection Planned: IP Jelšane pipeline Plinacro Regulated No No ***Nm 3 refers to m 3 at 0 C and bar (as defined in the EASEE gas CBP /01) Time Schedule Probable date of commissioning and the main milestones Defined Format National spatial plan: 2014 Commissioning: 2017/2018 Please tick the box below to indicate the status of the project: o Pre-feasibility studies o Feasibility studies o FID o Permitting o Construction General Criteria Detailed description Name of the corridor North-South gas interconnections in Central Eastern and South Eastern Europe Southern Gas Corridor 3

4 Adjacent corridor: North-South gas interconnections in Western Europe Main objectives of the project (necessary for Impact on the Corridor: connection to two the priority corridor) 5 import sources for Central Europe Impact on the Region: enables transit between Croatia, Italy, Austria and Hungary Impact on Slovenia: enable access to LNG terminals in the Adriatic sea and Croatia, enables supply diversification and increases security of supply If transmission, does the project have a significant impact on cross-border transmission capacity between two or more Member States? How much 6 (% change in transmission capacity) and between which Member States? Croatia -> Slovenia 100% (new IP) Specific Criteria Available options* / Defined Format Market integration, interoperability and system flexibility Does the project contribute to the integration of market areas or to eliminate the isolation of at least 1 Member State from the Internal Energy Market? How and which ones? What additional value does the project provide to the overall flexibility of the system (including capacity of reverse flow)? Additional cross border capacity and connection market areas in Italy, Slovenia, Austria and Croatia. New interconnection capacity with Croatia. System flexibility increase in the region. Increasing of the security and reliability of supply. Competition Does the project contribute to the diversification of counterparts 7 (yearly expected average volume and its share in the import of the impacted Member States in the year of commissioning)? According to the designed technical capacity up to 12,2 * 10 9 Nm3/y. TSO estimates that the project will significantly contribute to diversification of counterparts. 5 In case your project may contribute to another priority corridor in addition, please include an explanation on its positive impact and contribution to that corridor here 6 Please indicate the change in % between the cross-border capacity prior to the commissioning of the new project at both sides of the Member States concerned. 7 Commercial partner 4

5 Assumptions of shares vary from 10 to 30%. Does the project contribute to the diversification of import sources - including unconventional gas - (yearly expected average volume and its share in the import of the impacted Member States in the year of commissioning)? Does the project contribute to the diversification of import routes - including unconventional gas - (capacity and its share in the yearly import of the impacted Member States in the year of commissioning)? Does the project provide access to a regional gas storage or regional LNG terminal (capacity/yearly import of the impacted Member States in the year of commissioning)? What is the impact of the project on the price convergence: - Between locations for pipeline (including reverse flow), and LNG According to the designed technical capacity up to 12,2 * 10 9 Nm3/y. TSO estimates that the project will contribute significantly to the diversification of gas sources. Rough estimation of sources: 100%: Qatar, Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria, Cyprus, Israel, other. According to the designed technical capacity up to 12,2 * 10 9 Nm3/y. The project will significantly improve the diversification of transport route as these are completely new capacities up to 100%. Underground storage in Italy and Croatia. LNG terminal in Croatia. High High - Between periods for storages (and LNG to some extend) What is the impact of the project on the competition in the gas market (capacity HHI for the area of analysis)? The project will contribute to the diversification of supply routes. When we assume following conditions: 1) timescale for commissioning of projects, 2) additional capacities introduced, 3) additional sources, counterparts and IP introduced, the capacity HHI is estimated to change from 6800 to 4000 at first. When concluding all of the projects the capacity HHI is estimated to fall to Security of Supply 5

6 How does the project impact the short term 8 and long-term 9 resilience of the system? Does the project provide additional capacity in relation to national and regional 10 n-1? For the benefit of which countries/regions? What is the impact of the project on the remaining flexibility of the system? So far there was no short term supply gap detected in Slovenia. The project will further improve short- and long- term resilience of systems in the region of Croatia, Slovenia and Italy. For the benefit of Croatia, Hungary, Slovenia and Italy. The project will contribute to the flexibility of the transport routes and capacities in the region. Calculations of remaining capacities are dependent on load-assumptions. Sustainability Does the project support one or several of the listed objectives of sustainability o Reduce GHG emissions o Support back-up of renewable energy (Expected) Gas Sourcing (only applicable for import pipeline projects) Defined Format (Expected) Gas Sourcing LNG in the northern Adriatic Caspian region (e.g. Azerbaijan, Turkmenisten) Inter-governmental Agreements (only applicable for import pipeline projects) Inter-governmental agreements Defined Format Ø 8 Increase of daily capacity to cover peak demand based on 1 in 20 9 Long-term supply-demand balance by Refer to a group of countries 6

7 GENERAL DISCLAIMER Additional information can be requested to the project promoters during the entire duration of the PCI identification process. Additional request for information would be then submitted by the European Commission to the project promoters on behalf of the ad hoc regional working groups. 7