Company Y Facility Z. Sample January 2019 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report. EPEA Approval Number

Transcription

1 Company Y Facility Z Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report EPEA Approval Number February 219 Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 1 of 4

2 DISCLAIMER: This sample report is provided as guidance only. The structure, look and layout of monthly and annual reports are not mandated. Submitters are free to include additional or alternative content to that presented here, provided the requirements of the Air Monitoring Directive (AMD) and their approval are met. Users of this sample report must consult Chapter 9 Reporting of the AMD for requirements. This report represents the submission from one fictitious facility. The content of this sample has been generated in order to provide guidance on reporting it should not be viewed as establishing or limiting any requirements of actual facilities. Actual facilities will have different operational conditions and reporting requirements, so the content of actual reports will be different. While all reasonable attempts have been made to create a self-consistent sample report, inconsistencies may exist. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 2 of 4

3 Table of Contents Cover Letter... 4 Noted Incidents at the Facility... 5 Changes to Monitoring... 5 Operational Issue with Pollution Control Equipment... 5 Certification Reporting Forms Source Testing Limit Exceedances Summary of Audit Findings Continuous Ambient Network Equipment and Results Summary Station A at Location A Station B at Location B Station C at Location C Time Series Charts and Representations of Data Distribution of Ambient Air Monitoring Data Station A Station B Station C Ambient Intermittent Data Summary Passive Network Results Summary End of Report... 4 Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 3 of 4

4 15 February 219 ABC Regulator Street Address City, AB Postal Code ed to: Cover Letter Company Y Facility Z Street Address City, AB Postal Code Phone Number Website RE: Company Y - Facility Z EPEA Approval Number -- January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Enclosed is the January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report for the air monitoring program of Company Y - Facility Z, as operated between 1 January to 31 January 219. The representative of the Person Responsible is: Joe Smith, Environmental Director, Company Y Street Address City, AB Postal Code Phone Number Address This report is submitted by: Jack Brown, Environmental Coordinator, Company Y Street Address City, AB Postal Code Phone Number Address This report was prepared by John Bee of Monitoring Co., and reviewed by Jack Brown of Company Y. Company Y has retained the services of Monitoring Co. to conduct air monitoring functions on its behalf. Facility monitoring activities are carried out at the facility location, 7422 Rge Rd 71. Continuous and passive ambient monitoring is done in the vicinity, at locations provided within the report. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 4 of 4

5 Noted Incidents at the Facility The following incidents were reported in the month of January 219: Reference #111111: o SO 2 1-hour emissions of 3.29 tonnes on 9-Jan for clock hour ending 1: MST measured at sulphur recovery unit incinerator stack 88H-32 (exceeding limit of 1.76 tonnes/hour). o SO 2 concentrations on 9-Jan of 618. ppm (clock hour ending 1: MST) and ppm (clock hour ending 11: MST) measured at sulphur recovery unit incinerator stack 88H-32 (exceeding limit of 515 ppm/hour). o Ambient 1-hour SO 2 concentration of 179 ppb recorded at Station A for clock hour ending 1: MST on 9-Jan (exceeding the 1-hour AAAQO of 172 ppb). o At approximately 9:3 MST, a power outage at the plant affected the inlet compressor performance, resulting in lower acid gas flows and instability in the plant. The Facility Z Air Management Plan was initiated, and the plant was stabilized at approximately 11:3 MST. The SRU was bypassed for two hours as a result of this incident. Reference #111112: o The ambient SO 2 analyzer at Station B had 8% uptime in January 219, not meeting the monthly uptime requirement of 9%. o A component failure occurred on 12-Jan following the daily zero/span sequence. A failed solenoid control relay caused the analyzer to sample through the zero/span lines rather than the ambient air sample line. The solenoid control was repaired and the analyzer was returned to normal operation on 17-Jan, resulting in a total of 144 hours of ambient SO 2 data invalidated. Reference #111113: o There were no H 2S passive monitoring data reported for the month of January at the Passive H location. The sample was sent to the laboratory, but the sample was not analyzed by the laboratory and was reported as missing. Changes to Monitoring The PM2.5 monitor at station C was upgraded from a TEOM 14AB to a SHARP 53 on 16-Jan. Monitoring was unavailable for 4 hours, but operational time remained above 9%. Operational Issue with Pollution Control Equipment Sulphur recovery bed 2 became plugged at approximately 14:15 MST on 12-Jan. Operators on shift switched over to the backup bed at approximately 14:25 MST and no emissions limits were exceeded. Bed 2 was reconditioned and brought back online at approximately 15:3 on 29-Jan. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 5 of 4

6 Certification I certify that I have reviewed and verified this report and that the information is complete, accurate and representative of the monitoring results, reporting timeframe and the specified analysis, summarization and reporting requirements. Jack Brown, Environmental Coordinator, Company Y February 15, 219 Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 6 of 4

7 1 Reporting Forms The following AMD reporting forms were submitted for the month of January 219. AMD Approval Contravention Form (AMD1) AMD CEMS Summary Form (AMD2) AMD CEMS Zero and Span Summary Form (AMD3) o The span drift of the SO 2 analyzer on CEMS unit #11111 exceeded 2X the limit in Table 15 of the CEMS Code (8.1% from 2-Jan to 4-Jan) due to a failing UV lamp. The lamp was replaced and the analyzer recalibrated on 4-Jan. AMD Emissions Summary Form (AMD5) AMD Flare Stack Form (AMD6) o There were no residue gas flaring incidents in excess of 1 m 3 /day AMD Sulphur Recovery and Removal Form (AMD12) o Average sulphur inlet rates and the frequency distribution of hourly and daily mass emission rates of sulphur dioxide are reported on this form. 2 Source Testing A RATA was conducted on the incinerator stack on January 16, 219 by Source Testers Ltd. Relative accuracy was 5.7% for SO 2 concentration, 3.9% for flow and 1.7% for temperature. Details are provided in the RATA report submitted February 15, Limit Exceedances SO 2 emission limits were exceeded due to the plant upset on 9-Jan (ref # ) as described in the cover letter. There were a total of 3 limit exceedances in January. Table 1: Time Spent Exceeding Emission Limits for January 219 Parameter Stack 1 Hr Avg. Conc. (Hours) SO2 SRU Incinerator 1 Hr Mass Emission (Hours) 1 Day Mass Emission (Days) 1 Hr Min. Stack Top Temp (Hours) CEMS Analyzer % Avail Total # limit exceedances in month 4 Summary of Audit Findings An audit of the CEMS QAP for Facility Z was performed on Jan, led by Jane Dee of Auditors Inc. The following deficiencies were found: Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 7 of 4

8 Insufficient supply of gas cylinders: The QAP requires that there be a full spare cylinder of each calibration gas. There was no spare high-range SO 2 cylinder on site, and none was on order. A spare cylinder was ordered on January 28th. During an ambient station audit of Station C on 17-Jan, it was discovered that a tree nearby to Station C is approaching the height allowance under section 2.3 of the siting criteria in Chapter 3 of the AMD. Corrective action includes trimming the tree, which is planned for Spring. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 8 of 4

9 5 Continuous Ambient Network Equipment and Results Summary Hourly data and calibration reports for continuous ambient stations for January 219 were submitted to Alberta s Ambient Air Data Warehouse for Station A, Station B, and Station C. There were no missed calibrations or calibration failures. 5.1 Station A at Location A Table 2: Ambient Equipment Operation Summary for Station A Parameter Make Model Notes SO 2 TEI 43x No operational issues observed. H 2S TEI 45x No operational issues observed. PM 2.5 SHARP 53 No operational issues observed. Wind Speed Met One 1C No operational issues observed. Wind Direction Met One 2C No operational issues observed. Table 3: Ambient Data Summary for Station A Parameter (units) Objective/Guideline # of Exceedances Monthly Statistics 1H 24H 3D 1H 24H 3D Min. Avg. Max 1H Date Time Max 24H Date Operational time Valid Data Calibration Date SO2 (ppb) Jan 1: 15 9-Jan 1.% 95.4% 12-Jan H2S (ppb) Jan 18: 1 12-Jan 1.% 95.4% 12-Jan PM2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Jan 8: Jan 1.% 99.7% - W. Speed (km/h) Jan 19: Jan 1.% 1.% 12-Jun W. Direction ( ) % 1.% 12-Jun Date given is the most recent time the instrument was calibrated. Table 4: AAAQO Exceedances at Station A Date Time Parameter Avg. Period AAAQO Actual Reading Wind Speed Wind Direction Reference # 9-Jan 1: SO2 1-hr 172 ppb 179 ppb 6.8 km/h The exceedance of the 1-hour AAAQO at Station A on 9-Jan resulted from an upset at the facility on the same date, as described in the cover letter of this report. All analyzers and sensors at Station A had an operational uptime greater than 9% for the month of January. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 9 of 4

10 5.2 Station B at Location B Table 5: Ambient Equipment Operation Summary for Station B Parameter Make Model Notes SO 2 TEI 43x An equipment failure on 11-Jan led to 144 hours of lost operational time from 11- to 17-Jan. These hours were flagged as X for machine malfunction. Operational time and valid data were less than 9% for the month of January, at 8.1%. H 2S TEI 45x No operational issues observed. PM 2.5 SHARP 53 No operational issues observed. Wind Speed Met One 1C No operational issues observed. Wind Direction Met One 2C No operational issues observed. Table 6: Ambient Data Summary for Station B Parameter (units) Objective/Guideline # of Exceedances Monthly Statistics 1H 24H 3D 1H 24H 3D Min. Avg. Max 1H Date Time Max 24H Date Operational time Valid Data Calibration Date SO2 (ppb) Jan 14: 3 24-Jan 8.1% 78.5% 25-Jan H2S (ppb) Jan 1: 1 17-Jan 99.3% 98.9% 12-Jan PM2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Jan 12: Jan 99.3% 99.1% - W. Speed (km/h) Jan 18: 22 3-Jan 99.3% 99.3% 23-Jul W. Direction ( ) % 99.3% 23-Jul Date given is the most recent time the instrument was calibrated. The measured ambient air quality for Station B was within the AAAQOs for all monitored parameters. The sulphur dioxide (SO 2) analyzer at Station B did not meet the uptime requirement of 9% for January 219 due to a failed solenoid control relay, as described in the cover letter of this report. All other analyzers and sensors at Station B had an operational uptime greater than 9% for the month of January. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 1 of 4

11 5.3 Station C at Location C Table 7: Ambient Equipment Operation Summary for Station C Parameter Make Model Notes SO 2 TEI 43x No operational issues observed. H 2S TEI 45x No operational issues observed. PM 2.5 R&P 14AB Analyzer replaced with SHARP 53 on 16-Jan. Monitoring was unavailable for 4 hours during equipment change and setup. These hours were flagged as N for not in service. Operational time remained above 9%. Wind Speed Met One 1C No operational issues observed. Wind Direction Met One 2C No operational issues observed. Table 8: Ambient Data Summary for Station C Parameter (units) Objective/Guideline # of Exceedances Monthly Statistics 1H 24H 3D 1H 24H 3D Min. Avg. Max 1H Date Time Max 24H Date Operational time Valid Data Calibration Date SO2 (ppb) Jan 1: 6 19-Jan 1.% 95.2% 5-Jan H2S (ppb) Jan 6: 1 19-Jan 1.% 95.3% 3-Jan PM2.5 (µg/m 3 ) Jan 14: Jan 1.% 99.5% 16-Jan W. Speed (km/h) Jan 1: Jan 1.% 98.5% 17-Jan W. Direction ( ) % 95.2% 17-Jan Date given is the most recent time the instrument was calibrated. The measured ambient air quality for Station C was within the AAAQOs for all monitored parameters. All analyzers and sensors at Station C had an operational uptime greater than 9% for the month of January. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 11 of 4

12 6 Time Series Charts and Representations of Data Distribution of Ambient Air Monitoring Data 6.1 Station A 2 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for SO₂ - Station A 18 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 71 (95.4%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Day Value (N=71) AAAQO (172 ppb) Note: Exceedance of 1-hour objective on 9-Jan due to facility upset. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 12 of 4

13 Histogram of Hourly SO₂ Readings - Station A Percentiles: 1st: ppb 5th: ppb 1th: ppb 25th: ppb 5th: ppb 75th: 2 ppb 9th: 6 ppb 95th: 6 ppb 99th: 17 ppb Number of Hours >5 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 13 of 4

14 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for H₂S - Station A 12 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 71 (95.4%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Day Value (N=71) AAAQO (1 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 14 of 4

15 Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 15 of 4

16 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for PM₂.₅ - Station A Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 742 (99.7%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (2 hours) Concentration (µg/m³) Day Value (N=742) AAAQO (8 µg/m³) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 16 of 4

17 Histogram of Hourly PM₂.₅ Readings - Station A Number of Hours Percentiles: 1st: 1 µg/m³ 5th: 1 µg/m³ 1th: 2 µg/m³ 25th: 3 µg/m³ 5th: 5 µg/m³ 75th: 9 µg/m³ 9th: 17 µg/m³ 95th: 19 µg/m³ 99th: 25 µg/m³ >4 Concentration (µg/m³) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 17 of 4

18 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for W. Speed - Station A 35 3 Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report 25 Wind Speed (km/h) Day Value (N=744) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 18 of 4

19 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for W. Direction - Station A Wind Direction ( ) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report Day Value (N=744) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 19 of 4

20 Windrose - Station A NW (315 ) NNW N ( ) 35% 3% 25% NNE NE (45 ) 2% WNW W (27 ) 15% 1% 5% % ENE E (9 ) km/hr km/hr 8-11 km/hr 5-8 km/hr 3-5 km/hr WSW ESE -3 km/hr SW (225 ) SE (135 ) SSW SSE S (18 ) Note: Wind instrument last calibrated on 12-Jun-218. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 2 of 4

21 6.2 Station B Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for SO₂ - Station B 2 18 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 595 (8.%) Hours of Valid Data: 584 (78.5%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (8 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) X* - Machine Malfunction (144 hours) Y - Maintenance (3 hours) *Non-operational hours Day Value (N=584) AAAQO (172 ppb) Note: Instrument malfunction led to 144 hours of lost data from 11- to 17-Jan. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 21 of 4

22 Histogram of Hourly SO₂ Readings - Station B Percentiles: 1st: ppb 5th: ppb 1th: ppb 25th: ppb 5th: 1 ppb 75th: 1 ppb 9th: 2 ppb 95th: 4 ppb 99th: 8.25 ppb Number of Hours >9 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 22 of 4

23 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for H₂S - Station B 12 1 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 736 (98.9%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) *Non-operational hours Day Value (N=736) AAAQO (1 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 23 of 4

24 Number of Hours Histogram of Hourly H₂S Readings - Station B Percentiles: 1st: ppb 5th: ppb 1th: ppb 25th: ppb 5th: ppb 75th: 1 ppb 9th: 1 ppb 95th: 1 ppb 99th: 2 ppb >8 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 24 of 4

25 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for PM₂.₅ - Station B 9 8 Concentration (µg/m³) Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 737 (99.1%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) Q - Quality Assurance (2 hours) *Non-operational hours Day Value (N=737) AAAQO (8 µg/m³) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 25 of 4

26 Histogram of Hourly PM₂.₅ Readings - Station B Percentiles: 1st: 1 µg/m³ 5th: 1 µg/m³ 1th: 2 µg/m³ 25th: 4 µg/m³ 5th: 7 µg/m³ 75th: 1 µg/m³ 9th: 17 µg/m³ 95th: 22 µg/m³ 99th: 3.72 µg/m³ Number of Hours >4 Concentration (µg/m³) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 26 of 4

27 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for W. Speed - Station B Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 739 (99.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) *Non-operational hours Wind Speed (km/h) Day Value (N=739) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 27 of 4

28 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for W. Direction - Station B Wind Direction ( ) Day Hours Operational: 739 (99.3%) Hours of Valid Data: 739 (99.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: K* - Recording system failure (5 hours) *Non-operational hours Value (N=739) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 28 of 4

29 Windrose - Station B NNW N ( ) 25% NNE NW (315 ) 2% NE (45 ) 15% WNW 1% ENE km/hr W (27 ) 5% % E (9 ) km/hr 1-12 km/hr 7-1 km/hr 5-7 km/hr WSW ESE -5 km/hr SW (225 ) SE (135 ) SSW S (18 ) SSE Note: Wind instrument last calibrated on 23-Jul-218. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 29 of 4

30 6.3 Station C Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for SO₂ - Station C 2 18 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 78 (95.2%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (5 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Day Value (N=78) AAAQO (172 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 3 of 4

31 Histogram of Hourly SO₂ Readings - Station C Percentiles: 1st: ppb 5th: ppb 1th: ppb 25th: ppb 5th: ppb 75th: 1 ppb 9th: 2 ppb 95th: 5.95 ppb 99th: 11 ppb Number of Hours >16 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 31 of 4

32 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for H₂S - Station C 12 1 Concentration (ppb) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 79 (95.3%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: C - Calibration (3 hours) S - Daily Zero/Span (31 hours) Y - Maintenance (1 hours) Day Value (N=79) AAAQO (1 ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 32 of 4

33 Number of Hours Histogram of Hourly H 2 S Readings - Station C Percentiles: 1st: ppb 5th: ppb 1th: ppb 25th: ppb 5th: ppb 75th: ppb 9th: 1 ppb 95th: 1 ppb 99th: 1 ppb >8 Concentration (ppb) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 33 of 4

34 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for PM₂.₅ - Station C 9 Concentration (µg/m³) Hours Operational: 74 (99.5%) Hours of Valid Data: 74 (99.5%) Data Qualifier Flag Summary: N* - Not in Service (4 hours) *Non-operational hours Day Value (N=74) AAAQO (8 µg/m³) Note: TEOM analyzer replaced with SHARP 53 on 16-Jan. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 34 of 4

35 Histogram of Hourly PM₂.₅ Readings - Station C Number of Hours Percentiles: 1st: µg/m³ 5th: µg/m³ 1th: 1 µg/m³ 25th: 2 µg/m³ 5th: 4 µg/m³ 75th: 8 µg/m³ 9th: 11 µg/m³ 95th: 13 µg/m³ 99th: µg/m³ >32 Concentration (µg/m³) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 35 of 4

36 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Wind Spd. - Station C 4 35 Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report 3 25 Speed (km/h) Day Value (N=744) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 36 of 4

37 Timeseries Chart of Hourly Averages for Wind Direction - Station C Wind Direction ( ) Hours Operational: 744 (1.%) Hours of Valid Data: 744 (1.%) No Data Qualifier Flags to Report Day Value (N=744) Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 37 of 4

38 Windrose - Station C NNW N ( ) 2% NNE NW (315 ) 15% NE (45 ) WNW 1% 5% ENE 16-3 km/hr 1-16 km/hr W (27 ) % E (9 ) 6-1 km/hr 4-6 km/hr 3-4 km/hr WSW ESE -3 km/hr SW (225 ) SE (135 ) SSW S (18 ) SSE Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 38 of 4

39 7 Ambient Intermittent Data Summary Benzene was sampled at Station A, Station B and Station C by Summa Canister per the NAPS Schedule on January 3, 9, 15, 21, and 27. Table 9: Ambient Intermittent Data Station 3-Jan 9-Jan 15-Jan 21-Jan 27-Jan Monthly Average Station A.394 µg/m µg/m3.2 µg/m3.137 µg/m µg/m3.471 µg/m3 Station B.448 µg/m3.244 µg/m3.371 µg/m µg/m µg/m3 1.8 µg/m3 Station C µg/m µg/m µg/m µg/m3.713 µg/m µg/m3 Notes: Intermittent benzene data and the certified laboratory analysis report were submitted to Alberta s Ambient Air Data Warehouse. 8 Passive Network Results Summary A total of 1 passive stations (measuring SO 2 and H 2S) are operated as part of the ambient air quality monitoring network as follows: Passive D, Passive E, Passive F, Passive G, Passive H, Passive I, Passive J, Passive K, Passive L, and Passive M. Blank and replicate samples were taken at Passive D in January. Table 1: Passive Data Summary Parameter Monthly AAAQO Maximum Reading Average of Network Number of Samples Number of Stations over Objectives SO 2 (ppb) 11 ppb H 2S (ppb) N/A N/A Notes: Results from passive sample and replicate at the Passive D station were compared and were within ±.5 ppb of each other. The blank indicated no apparent contamination. The H 2S sample at Passive H was lost; no reading was available for January at that station. Passive data and certified laboratory analysis report were submitted to Alberta s Ambient Air Data Warehouse. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 39 of 4

40 End of Report This page, 4 of 4, ends the January 219 Monthly Air Quality Monitoring Report. Sample January 219 Monthly Industrial Air Monitoring Report Page 4 of 4