NEGATIVE DECLARATION. Document Released

Transcription

1 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Pursuant to Division 6, Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 6, Sections and of the California Administrative Code and pursuant to the Procedures for Preparation and Processing of Environmental Impact Reports adopted by the County of Sacramento pursuant to Sacramento County Ordinance No. SCC-116, the Environmental Coordinator of Sacramento County, State of California, does prepare, make, declare, publish, and cause to be filed with the County Clerk of Sacramento County, State of California, this Negative Declaration re: The Project described as follows: 1. Control Number: 05-ZOB Title and Short Description of Project: AGGREGATE MINING-RELATED ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS. Amend Section 235 of Title II, Chapter 35, Article 4 of the Sacramento County Zoning Code, as it pertains to surface mining (Appendix A). Repeal and Re-enact Chapter (Title 20) of the Sacramento County Zoning Code, as it relates to mining reclamation plans (Appendix B). 3. Assessor s Parcel Number: Countywide 4. Location of Project: All of the unincorporated area of Sacramento County currently subject to the Sacramento County Zoning Code and Sacramento County Code. 5. Project Applicant: Sacramento County Planning and Community Development Department 6. Said project will not have a significant effect on the environment for the following reasons: a) It will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. b) It will not have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals. c) It will not have impacts, which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. d) It will not have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 7. As a result thereof, the preparation of an environmental impact report pursuant to the Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California) is not required. 8. The attached Initial Study has been performed by the Sacramento County Department of Environmental Review and Assessment in support of this Negative Declaration. Further information may be obtained by contacting the Department of Environmental Review and Assessment at 827 Seventh Street, Room 220, Sacramento, California, 95814, or phone (916) Joyce Horizumi ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Document Released P:\2005\ SM Zone Amend\Env Docs\Doc\050147NegDec.doc

2

3 Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY PROJECT INFORMATION CONTROL NUMBER: 05-ZOB-0147 NAME: AGGREGATE MINING-RELATED ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS LOCATION: All of the unincorporated area of Sacramento County currently subject to the Sacramento County Zoning Code and Sacramento County Code. ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER: Countywide APPLICANT: Sacramento County Planning and Community Development Department th Street, Room 230 Sacramento, CA (916) PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Amend Section 235 of Title II, Chapter 35, Article 4 of the Sacramento County Zoning Code, as it pertains to surface mining (Appendix A). 2. Repeal and Re-enact Chapter (Title 20) of the Sacramento County Zoning Code, as it relates to mining reclamation plans (Appendix B). ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Sacramento County is located in the north-central portion of California, and encompasses approximately 994 square miles in the middle of the 400-mile long Central Valley, which is California's prime agricultural region. The County is bordered by Contra Costa and San Joaquin Counties on the south, Amador and El Dorado Counties on the east, Placer and Sutter Counties on the north, and Yolo and Solano Counties on the west. Sacramento County extends from the low delta lands between the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers north to about ten miles beyond the State Capitol and east to the foothills of the Sierra Nevada Mountains. The southernmost portion of Sacramento County has direct access to the San Francisco Bay. DERA Initial Study IS-1 05-ZOB-0147

4 Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments Basic habitat types within Sacramento County include riparian, oak woodland and savanna, woodland, wetlands (including emergent marsh) and grasslands. The areas radiating around the City of Sacramento are more urbanized environments, with the bulk of essentially undisturbed habitats occurring in the more outlying regions or within resource conservation areas. The Sacramento County General Plan only designates one general region (areas to the approximate northeast and southwest of Mather Air Force Base) as an Aggregate Resource Area, but there are many abandoned or active mining areas within the County. Abandoned areas primarily consist of historic gold mining operations. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS See the Initial Study Checklist attached to this report and the following discussion. BACKGROUND The following discussion was provided by the Sacramento County Department of Planning and Community Development (Planning Department): On March 10, 1999 [the] Board [of Supervisors] initiated an amendment to the Sacramento County Zoning Code to provide better guidance for evaluating mining applications near to residentially-zoned land and residential uses. The initiation Resolution No [(Appendix C)] contained language developed through a public outreach process involving the aggregate producers and their representatives, industry association representatives, numerous landowners and other interested members of the general public[]. The process also included a joint presentation to the Community Planning Advisory Councils for Cosumnes and Vineyard. Recent efforts have relied on industry assistance to help incorporate into the existing Zoning Code the language developed through the 1999 stakeholder process. The original stakeholder text has been simplified, but with the goal of preserving its intent. Additional changes are offered by the Aggregate Industry to address hardrock mining and to account for a shift in responsibilities related to the new aggregate resource specialist position created in the Planning Department. The revised draft Zoning Code Amendment language is found in [Appendix A]. LAND USE The proposed project would amend Section 235 of Title II, Chapter 35, Article 4 of the Zoning Code. This amendment would consist of substantial additions to existing language, but the deletions involved are minor and consist primarily of deletions DERA Initial Study IS-2 05-ZOB-0147

5 Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments necessary in order to ensure smooth splicing of the new language to the old. The Planning Department provided the following summation of Zoning Code amendments: 1. Reorganize the existing language and provide additional language to improve clarity of intent and ease of use. Neither the reorganization nor the clarity language alters any policy or its intent. 2. Provide guidance to the Board of Supervisors for processing mining use permit applications which would result in mining near sensitive receptors, e.g. residential uses. New language would alter policy, standards and guidelines related to hours of operation, setbacks, and the mitigation and monitoring of impacts. Some standards and guidelines are specific to types of mining-residential boundaries. 3. Add language that will regulate hardrock mining. New language would provide appropriate slope standards, address impacts unique to hardrock mining, and also reference California Office of Safety Hazard Administration regulations on handling explosives. 4. Expand the definition of Mining Uses to include ready-mix concrete, asphaltic concrete and recycling facilities. The project also includes changes to the County Code, summarized by the Planning Department as follows: 1. Reorganize the chapter and revise select language by incorporating portions of the State Mining and Geology Board Model SMARA Ordinance on surface mining and reclamation (revised 1/14/99). 2. Move County Code sections on Work Authorization Permits and the need for a Conditional Use Permit to more appropriate locations for implementation in the Zoning Code. 3. Revise selected process-related regulations, including informational requirements for reclamation plans and requirements for financial assurances. 4. Add new process-related language regarding findings of approval for reclamation plans, future code amendments, appeals of Planning Department decisions and applicant statements of responsibility. 5. Delete sections of the County Code that are covered elsewhere. As shown by the above summations, the proposed project consists of adding additional language that clarifies the intent of the existing codes. While Item 3 and 4 of the Zoning Code amendments may appear to be new uses, they are not; those uses are already allowed within Sacramento County but have previously been regulated via more nonspecific mechanisms under the Surface Mining provisions of the Zoning Code. Mining projects require the acquisition of a Use Permit and must undergo CEQA review. For DERA Initial Study IS-3 05-ZOB-0147

6 Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments instance, there is currently an application being processed through environmental review for a hardrock mining Use Permit. Given that the new language proposed will not permit new uses that are not already allowed by current Zoning Code language, no new significant impacts will result from the proposed code changes. In fact, the proposed new language should result in a reduction of existing surface mining impacts, given that it includes specific noise thresholds, air quality and noise monitoring requirements, requirements for lighting and landscaping plans, hazardous materials notification requirements, standard operating hours, and specific buffers and other measures designed to protect adjacent residential uses. Further, any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/projectspecific impacts would be addressed at that time. REQUESTS/REQUIREMENTS OF VARIOUS AGENCIES None requested. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES None recommended. INITIAL STUDY PREPARERS Environmental Coordinator: Joyce Horizumi Assistant Environmental Coordinator: Robert Caikoski Division Manager: Catherine Hack Project Leader: Lauren Hocker Initial Review: Robert DeMorales Office Manager: Linda Bryceson Office Assistant: Juan Gutierrez DERA Initial Study IS-4 05-ZOB-0147

7 SACRAMENTO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT th Street, Sacramento CA (916) INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST FOR Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments CONTROL NUMBER: 05-ZOB-0147 This checklist identifies physical, biological, social and economic factors that might be affected by the proposed project. The words "significant" and "significance" used throughout the following checklist are related to impacts as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS-1 05-ZOB-0147

8 DERA Initial Study Checklist Initial Study Checklist Potentially Significant i Less Than Significant with Mitigation ii Less Than Significant or No Impact iii Comments 1. LAND USE - Would the project: a. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to a general plan, specific plan or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? b. Physically disrupt or divide an established community? 2. POPULATION/HOUSING - Would the project: a. b. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of infrastructure)? Displace substantial amounts of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 3. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance or areas containing prime soils to uses not conducive to agricultural production? The project is consistent with the environmental requirements of all applicable land use plans and policies. The proposed Code amendment project does not involve site-specific issues, and will not itself cause the disruption or division of an established community. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment project does not involve the construction of new unplanned homes, businesses or extension of infrastructure. The proposed Code amendment does not involve the loss of existing housing. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment does not involve the conversion of farmland. Furthermore, any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS-2 05-ZOB-0147

9 DERA Initial Study Checklist Potentially Significant i Less Than Significant with Mitigation ii Less Than Significant or No Impact iii Comments b. Conflict with any existing Williamson Act contract? c. Introduce incompatible uses in the vicinity of existing agricultural uses? 4. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a. b. c. Substantially alter existing viewsheds such as scenic highways, corridors or vistas? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Create a new source of substantial light, glare or shadow that would result in safety hazards or adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 5. AIRPORTS - Would the project: a. Result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the vicinity of an airport/airstrip? The proposed Code amendment does not involve the conversion of farmland. Furthermore, any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment is not site-specific. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment is not site-specific. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment is not site-specific, but does include provisions for using plantings to screen fencing and for preventing excavations to encroach on existing viewsheds, thus reducing aesthetic impacts. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment is not site-specific, but does include provisions that will assist in the regulation of light sources within a mining project. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code Amendment is not site-specific. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS-3 05-ZOB-0147

10 DERA Initial Study Checklist Potentially Significant i Less Than Significant with Mitigation ii Less Than Significant or No Impact iii Comments b. Expose people residing or working in the project area to aircraft noise levels in excess of applicable standards? c. d. Result in a substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft? Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? 6. PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the project: a. b. c. d. e. f. Have an adequate water supply for full buildout of the project? Have adequate wastewater treatment and disposal facilities for full buildout of the project? Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project s solid waste disposal needs? Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the construction of new water supply or wastewater treatment and disposal facilities or expansion of existing facilities? Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of storm water drainage facilities? Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of electric or natural gas service? The proposed Code amendment is not site-specific. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment is not site-specific. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment is not site-specific. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment would not require water. The proposed Code amendment would not produce wastewater. The proposed Code amendment would not require waste disposal services. The proposed Code amendment would not require constructing new wastewater facilities. The proposed Code amendment would not require constructing new stormwater facilities. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment would not require electric or natural gas service. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS-4 05-ZOB-0147

11 DERA Initial Study Checklist Potentially Significant i Less Than Significant with Mitigation ii Less Than Significant or No Impact iii Comments g. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of emergency services? h. i. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of public school services? Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of park and recreation services? 7. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project: a. b. c. d. e. Result in a substantial increase in peak hour vehicle trip-ends that could exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the County? Result in a substantial adverse impact to access and/or circulation? Result in substantial adverse impact due to inadequate parking capacity? Result in a substantial adverse impact to public safety on area roadways? Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? The proposed Code amendment does not involve the provision of emergency services. The proposed Code amendment will not require the use of public school services. The proposed Code amendment does not involve the provision of park services. The proposed Code amendment will not result in additional traffic. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment does not involve traffic circulation or vehicle access issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment does not involve parking. The proposed Code amendment will not result in substantial adverse impacts to public safety on area roadways. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment does not involve alternative transportation issues. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS-5 05-ZOB-0147

12 DERA Initial Study Checklist Potentially Significant i Less Than Significant with Mitigation ii Less Than Significant or No Impact iii Comments 8. AIR QUALITY - Would the project: a. b. c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations in excess of standards? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? 9. NOISE - Would the project: a. b. Result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established by the local general plan, noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? Result in a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity? 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project: a. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or substantially interfere with groundwater recharge? The proposed Code amendment will assist with the regulation of pollutant emissions from mining activities; it does not involve sitespecific air quality issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment is not site-specific. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project will not create objectionable odors. The proposed Code amendment will assist with the regulation of noise from mining activities; it does not involve site-specific noise issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment will assist with the regulation of noise from mining activities; it does not involve site-specific noise issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment does not involve site-specific groundwater supply or recharge issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS-6 05-ZOB-0147

13 DERA Initial Study Checklist Potentially Significant i Less Than Significant with Mitigation ii Less Than Significant or No Impact iii Comments b. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the project area and/or increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off-site? c. d. e. f. g. Develop within a 100-year floodplain as mapped on a federal Flood Insurance Rate Map or within a local flood hazard area? Place structures that would impede or redirect flood flows within a 100-year floodplain? Expose people or structures to a substantial risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Create or contribute runoff that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems? Create substantial sources of polluted runoff or otherwise substantially degrade ground or surface water quality? 11. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a. b. Expose people or structures to substantial risk of loss, injury or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Result in substantial soil erosion, siltation or loss of topsoil? The project does not involve site-specific drainage issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/projectspecific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project does not involve site-specific drainage issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/projectspecific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project does not involve site-specific drainage issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/projectspecific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project does not involve site-specific drainage/flooding issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project does not involve site-specific drainage issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/projectspecific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment will not create new sources of polluted runoff. The proposed Code amendment will not expose people or structures to new geologic hazards. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment will not result in substantial new soil erosion, siltation, or loss of topsoil. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS-7 05-ZOB-0147

14 DERA Initial Study Checklist Potentially Significant i Less Than Significant with Mitigation ii Less Than Significant or No Impact iii Comments c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in onor off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, soil expansion, liquefaction or collapse? d. e. f. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available? Result in a substantial loss of an important mineral resource? Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site? 12. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a. b. c. Have a substantial adverse effect on any special status species? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community? Have a substantial adverse effect on wetlands designated as jurisdictional waters of the United States as defined by Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act? The project does not involve site-specific geological issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/projectspecific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment does not require the use of wastewater disposal systems. The proposed Code amendment pertains to the clarification of mining language, and therefore pertains to the appropriate extraction of important mineral resources. No significant impacts will result. The project does not involve site-specific paleontological resource issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project does not involve site-specific biological resources issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project does not involve site-specific biological resources issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project does not involve site-specific biological resources issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS-8 05-ZOB-0147

15 DERA Initial Study Checklist Potentially Significant i Less Than Significant with Mitigation ii Less Than Significant or No Impact iii Comments d. Have a substantial adverse effect on the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species? e. f. g. Adversely affect or result in the removal of native or landmark trees? Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional, state or federal plan for the conservation of habitat? 13. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a. b. c. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource? Have a substantial adverse effect on an archaeological resource? Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? The project does not involve site-specific biological resources issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project does not involve site-specific biological resources issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The proposed Code amendment is consistent with local policies/ordinances protecting biological resources. There are no known conflicts with any approved plan for the conservation of habitat. The project does not involve site-specific cultural resources issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project does not involve site-specific cultural resources issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. The project does not involve site-specific cultural resources issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and sitespecific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS-9 05-ZOB-0147

16 DERA Initial Study Checklist Potentially Significant i Less Than Significant with Mitigation ii Less Than Significant or No Impact iii Comments 14. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a. Create a substantial hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? The proposed Code amendment will not create a substantial hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials b. Expose the public or the environment to a substantial hazard through reasonably foreseeable upset conditions involving the release of hazardous materials? The proposed Code amendment will not expose the public or the environment to a substantial hazard through reasonably foreseeable upset conditions involving the release of hazardous materials. c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? The proposed Code amendment will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. d. Be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section , resulting in a substantial hazard to the public or the environment? The proposed Code amendment does not involve site-specific hazardous constraints issues. Any later project subject to the new Code would undergo individual environmental review as part of a request for a Use Permit, and site-specific/project-specific impacts would be addressed at that time. e. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response or emergency evacuation plan? The project would not interfere with any known emergency response or evacuation plan. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS ZOB-0147

17 DERA Initial Study Checklist SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION LAND USE CONSISTENCY Current Land Use Designation Consistent Not Consistent Comments General Plan Various n/a Community Plan Various n/a Land Use Zone Various n/a i Potentially Significant indicates there is substantial evidence that an effect MAY be significant. If there are one or more Potentially Significant entries and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required. Further research of a potentially significant impact may reveal that the impact is actually less than significant or less than significant with mitigation. ii Less than Significant with Mitigation applies where an impact could be significant but specific mitigation has been identified that reduces the impact to a less than significant level. iii Less than Significant or No Impact indicates that either a project will have an impact but the impact is considered minor or that a project does not impact the particular resource. Aggregate Mining-Related Zoning Code Amendments IS ZOB-0147

18 Appendix A A- 1

19 A- 2

20 A- 3

21 A- 4

22 A- 5

23 A- 6

24 A- 7

25 A- 8

26 A- 9

27 A-10

28 A-11

29 A-12

30 A-13

31 A-14

32 A-15

33 A-16

34 A-17

35 A-18

36 A-19

37 A-20

38 A-21

39 A-22

40 A-23

41 A-24

42 A-25

43 Appendix B B- 1

44 B- 2

45 B- 3

46 B- 4

47 B- 5

48 B- 6

49 B- 7

50 B- 8

51 B- 9

52 B-10

53 B-11

54 B-12

55 B-13

56 Appendix C C- 1

57 C- 2

58 C- 3

59 C- 4

60 C- 5

61 C- 6

62 C- 7

63 C- 8

64 C- 9