Type of Problem. All existing and anticipated future problems/concerns. Building Flooding Drainage Issue Street Flooding Restrictive Structure

Transcription

1 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) Advisory Committee Meeting Worksheet (1/10/12) SUMMARY OF SUGGESTED TARGET STUDY AREAS & PROMISING SOLUTIONS FOR EVALUATION IN PHASE 2 Problem Area Name 1 Existing Buildings in SFHA 2 Citywide Programs to Address Problems/ Concerns Watershed Battle Creek Lancassange Creek Lentzier Creek Lick Run Mill Creek Ohio River/Cane Run Silver Creek/ Pleasant Run Battle Creek Lancassange Creek Lentzier Creek Lick Run Mill Creek Ohio River/Cane Run Silver Creek/ Pleasant Run 3 CSO Area Ohio River/ Cane Run 4 Oak Park Conservancy District Council District Type of Problem Mapped Problem Area or Buildings in SFHA List of Promising Solutions to be Evaluated Further in Phase 2 All Building Flooding 2096 (buildings) Community Rating System (CRS) Program Voluntary Acquisition and/or Floodproofing Program Flood Depth Mapping Fluvial Erosion Mapping Flood Response Plan Stream Studies All 1 2 Lancassange Creek 3 6 All existing and anticipated future problems/concerns Building Flooding Drainage Issue Street Flooding Restrictive Structure Building Flooding Drainage Issue Maintenance Riverine Flooding All 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 80, 81, 82, 83, 115, 116, 117, 131, 159, 161 1, 2, 6, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 47, 61, 62, Floodplain Management Ordinance Stormwater Ordnance & Technical Standards Development Codes Design Standards Drainage Complaint Tracking Protection of Critical Facilities Operation & Maintenance Manuals Green Infrastructure Citywide Programs Solutions Green Infrastructure Grey Infrastructure Flood Protection Levee/Berm Cut-off Channel 1

2 5 Lentzier Creek Street Flooding Restrictive Structure Lentzier Creek 6 Riverine Flooding Street Flooding 6 Waverly Lick Run 2 Building Flooding Drainage Issue Maintenance Riverine Flooding Street Flooding Restrictive Structure 7 Woodland Court Lancassange Creek 5 Riverine Flooding Street Flooding 8 Lick Run Lick Run 4 Building Flooding Drainage Issue Erosion Riverine Flooding Restrictive Structure 9 Mill Creek Mill Creek 5 Drainage Issue Erosion Riverine Flooding Restrictive Structure 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 74, 75, 95, 119, 136, 137, 138, 139, 163, 177, 178, 179, 180, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, , 76, 77, 79, 92, 118, 123, 134, 135, , 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 142, 183 3, 4, 5, 43, 85, 172, 175, 185 Stream Restoration Buildings in the SFHA Solutions Citywide Programs Solutions Green Infrastructure Stream Restoration Buildings in SFHA Solutions Citywide Programs Solutions Green Infrastructure Grey Infrastructure Stormwater Pond Stream Restoration Voluntary Acquisition and/or Floodproofing Program Citywide Programs Solutions Green Infrastructure Grey Infrastructure Stormwater Pond Stream Restoration Buildings in SFHA Solutions Citywide Programs Solutions 73, 90, 94, 120 Green Infrastructure Grey Infrastructure Buildings in SFHA Solutions Citywide Programs Solutions 84, 91, 147, 192 Green Infrastructure Grey Infrastructure Stream Restoration Citywide Programs Solutions 2

3 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) PROBLEM & SOLUTION SUMMARY WORKSHEET I. PROBLEM NAME Existing Buildings in the SFHA II. III. IV. PROBLEM AREA NUMBER(S) 2096 buildings PROBLEM TYPE(S) Building Flooding or in SFHA Drainage Issue Erosion Maintenance Riverine Flooding Street Flooding Restrictive Structure MAJOR WATERSHED Battle Creek (3 buildings) Lancassange Creek (1195 buildings) Lentzier Creek (21 buildings) Lick Run (375 buildings) Mill Creek (105 buildings) Ohio River/Cane Run (361 buildings; 1584 buildings protected by levee) Silver Creek/Pleasant Run (36 buildings) V. CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER PROBLEM AREA(S) Problems may also be addressed through structural solutions identified on various Problem and Solution Summary Worksheets. VI. COUNCIL DISTRICT(S) & COUNCILOR(S) City Council District #1 represented by Mike Smith City Council District #2 represented by Ed Zastawny City Council District #3 represented by Zach Payne City Council District #4 represented by Connie Sellers City Council District #5 represented by Lisa Noel-Gill City Council District #6 represented by Bryan Glover VII. PROBLEM DEFINED This problem was determined by CBBEL through a GIS desktop analysis that included overlaying the Preliminary DFIRMs and the City s building footprint layer. Although not all of these buildings have flooded, this problem area is included in this SWMP due to the potential for building flooding and restricted vehicular access. 3

4 4

5 VIII. SCREENING OF POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S) Likely Meets Criteria (Y/N) 2 Pursue STRUCTURAL 1 Eco Env Soc (Y/N) 3 Source NA N Conveyance NA N End-of-Pipe NA N Restoration NA N NON-STRUCTURAL Community Rating System (CRS) Program participate to reduce flood insurance premiums, promote higher standards and improve flood awareness Voluntary Acquisition and/or Floodproofing Program implement a cost-share program for structures in the 1% annual chance of flooding Flood Depth Mapping conduct an analysis to show potential flood depths and floodrelated damage Fluvial Erosion Mapping conduct an analysis to illustrate anticipated movement of waterways and the relationship to existing structures and access roads Flood Response Plan prepare Plan (including Evacuation Plan) for structures and access roads in 1% annual chance of flooding Stream Studies conduct detailed stream study of Lentzier Creek and restudy Lancassange Creek, Lick Run, and Mill Creek based on updated topographic data 1 Structural solutions for this Problem Area may be addressed on other Problem and Solution Summary Worksheets 2 Likelihood of the potential solution to meet the Economic (Eco), Environmental (Env) and Social (Soc) Criteria from the SWMP 3 Pursue as a Promising Solution if likely to meet all 3 criteria IX. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP(S) Evaluate the feasibility of all non-structural solutions as part of Phase 2 of this SWMP Further study of [list specific solutions] be funded and undertaken on a parallel path but separate from this SWMP No further study of [list specific solutions as well as reason] at this time. 5

6 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) PROBLEM & SOLUTION SUMMARY WORKSHEET I. PROBLEM NAME Citywide Programs II. III. IV. PROBLEM AREA NUMBER(S) All existing and anticipated future problems/concerns PROBLEM TYPE(S) Building Flooding or in SFHA Drainage Issue Erosion Maintenance Riverine Flooding Street Flooding Restrictive Structure MAJOR WATERSHED Battle Creek Lancassange Creek Lentzier Creek Lick Run Mill Creek Ohio River/Cane Run Silver Creek/Pleasant Run V. CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER PROBLEM AREA(S) NA VI. COUNCIL DISTRICT(S) & COUNCILOR(S) City Council District #1 represented by Mike Smith City Council District #2 represented by Ed Zastawny City Council District #3 represented by Zach Payne City Council District #4 represented by Connie Sellers City Council District #5 represented by Lisa Noel-Gill City Council District #6 represented by Bryan Glover VII. PROBLEM DEFINED This problem identifies policies and programs to address existing and anticipated future stormwater and flooding problems/concerns. It is based on a preliminary review of current policies and programs; issues identified during the screening-level analysis of this SWMP; and meetings with key City staff. Future concerns include: Increased runoff from new development Increased flooding and drainage problems Need for additional and/or replacement infrastructure as well as maintenance of infrastructure Changes in land use and imperviousness Anticipated pollutant loadings and stormwater pollutant removal requirements Loss of habitat and species diversity Impacts to quality of life 6

7 VIII. SCREENING OF POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S) Likely Meets Criteria (Y/N) 1 Pursue STRUCTURAL Eco Env Soc (Y/N) 2 Source NA N Conveyance NA N End-of-Pipe NA N Restoration NA N NON-STRUCTURAL Floodplain Management Ordinance update requirements to include compensatory floodplain storage and no adverse impact language Stormwater Ordinance & Technical Standards update ordinance and technical standards to include release rates, channel protection volume and LID Development Codes update zoning/subdivision control ordinances and special district requirements to integrate stormwater and floodplain management strategies Design Standards update standards to promote low impact development Drainage Complaint Tracking create and maintain a GIS-based database to record drainage and flooding complaints and track action taken Protection of Critical Facilities update codes to require floodproofing of existing critical facilities and prohibit development of future critical facilities in the SFHA Operations & Maintenance Manuals prepare a manual to schedule and track operation and maintenance of storage, treatment and conveyance systems 1 Likelihood of the potential solution to meet the Economic (Eco), Environmental (Env) and Social (Soc) Criteria from the SWMP 2 Pursue as a Promising Solution if likely to meet all 3 criteria IX. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP(S) Evaluate the feasibility of all non-structural solutions as part of Phase 2 of this SWMP Further study of [list specific solutions] be funded and undertaken on a parallel path but separate from this SWMP No further study of [list specific solutions as well as reason] at this time. 7

8 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) PROBLEM & SOLUTION SUMMARY WORKSHEET I. PROBLEM NAME CSO Area IV. MAJOR WATERSHED Ohio River/Cane Run II. III. PROBLEM AREA NUMBER(S) 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 80, 81, 82, 83, 115, 116, 117, 131, 159, 161 PROBLEM TYPE(S) Building Flooding or in SFHA Drainage Issue Erosion Maintenance Riverine Flooding Street Flooding Restrictive Structure V. CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER PROBLEM AREA(S) NA VI. COUNCIL DISTRICT(S) & COUNCILOR(S) City Council District #1 represented by Mike Smith City Council District #2 represented by Ed Zastawny VII. PROBLEM DEFINED This area is heavily urbanized and generates more runoff than the current infrastructure can handle. As a result, CSO events, flooded buildings, and standing water in the streets are common occurrences. 8

9 9

10 VIII. SCREENING OF POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S) Likely Meets Criteria (Y/N) 1 Pursue STRUCTURAL Eco Env Soc (Y/N) 2 Source Green Infrastructure integrate porous pavement and bioretention into public streetscape; develop cost-share program to promote porous pavement, rain gardens, and rainwater harvesting on private property Conveyance NA (addressed through existing City projects) N End-of-Pipe NA N Restoration NA N NON-STRUCTURAL NA (covered under Citywide Programs) N 2 Likelihood of the potential solution to meet the Economic (Eco), Environmental (Env) and Social (Soc) Criteria from the SWMP 3 Pursue as a Promising Solution if likely to meet all 3 criteria IX. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP(S) Evaluate the feasibility of green infrastructure to reduce nuisance flooding, CSO events, and improve water qualtiy as part of Phase 2 of this SWMP Further study of [list specific solutions] be funded and undertaken on a parallel path but separate from this SWMP No further study of [list specific solutions as well as reason] at this time. 10

11 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) PROBLEM & SOLUTION SUMMARY WORKSHEET I. PROBLEM NAME Oak Park Conservancy District IV. MAJOR WATERSHED Lancassange Creek II. III. PROBLEM AREA NUMBER(S) 1, 2, 6, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 47, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 74, 75, 95, 119, 136, 137, 138, 139, 163, 177, 178, 179, 180, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 205 PROBLEM TYPE(S) Building Flooding or in SFHA Drainage Issue Erosion Maintenance Riverine Flooding Street Flooding Restrictive Structure V. CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER PROBLEM AREA(S) Problems may be addressed on the Buildings in the SFHA Solution Summary Worksheet. VI. COUNCIL DISTRICT(S) & COUNCILOR(S) City Council District #3 represented by Zach Payne City Council District #6 represented by Bryan Glover VII. PROBLEM DEFINED This area is within the Lancassange Creek floodplain. Much of this area is either without stormwater infrastructure or the infrastructure that is in place is undersized, needs maintained, or replaced to function properly. 11

12 12

13 VIII. SCREENING OF POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S) Likely Meets Criteria (Y/N) 1 Pursue STRUCTURAL Eco Env Soc (Y/N) 2 Source Green Infrastructure integrate porous pavement and bioretention into public streetscape; develop cost-share program to promote porous pavement, rain gardens, and rainwater harvesting on private property Conveyance Grey Infrastructure improve storm sewer network Flood Protection Levee/Berm to protect Oak Park area to Ohio River 500-year flood elevation (includes a pumping station and flap gate at the Ohio River) Cut-off Channel to divert stormwater from the Oak Park area during flood conditions End-of-Pipe Stormwater Ponds retrofit and resize existing ponds to accommodate additional stormwater N Y N N Restoration Stream Restoration restore riparian corridor to improve stream habitat, water quality, and prevent further erosion of streambank NON-STRUCTURAL NA (covered under Citywide Programs and Buildings in the SFHA) N 1 Likelihood of the potential solution to meet the Economic (Eco), Environmental (Env) and Social (Soc) Criteria from the SWMP 2 Pursue as a Promising Solution if likely to meet all 3 criteria IX. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP(S) Evaluate the feasibility of green infrastructure, grey infrastructure, flood protection levee/berm, cut-off channel and stream restoration as part of Phase 2 of this SWMP Further study of the storage benefit of retrofitted/resized stormwater ponds should be funded and undertaken on a parallel path but separate from this SWMP. No further study of [list specific solutions as well as reason] at this time. 13

14 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) PROBLEM & SOLUTION SUMMARY WORKSHEET I. PROBLEM NAME Lentzier Creek IV. MAJOR WATERSHED Lentzier Creek II. III. PROBLEM AREA NUMBER(S) 50, 76, 77, 79, 92, 118, 123, 134, 135, 162 PROBLEM TYPE(S) Building Flooding or in SFHA Drainage Issue Erosion Maintenance Riverine Flooding Street Flooding Restrictive Structure V. CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER PROBLEM AREA(S) Problems may be addressed on the Buildings in the SFHA Solution Summary Worksheet. VI. COUNCIL DISTRICT(S) & COUNCILOR(S) City Council District #6 represented by Bryan Glover VII. PROBLEM DEFINED This area is in the Lentzier Creek floodplain and experiences flash flooding, standing water in yards, and driveways and flooding of streets. 14

15 15

16 VIII. SCREENING OF POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S) Likely Meets Criteria (Y/N) 1 Pursue STRUCTURAL Eco Env Soc (Y/N) 2 Source NA (being evaluated as part of future River Ridge development) N Conveyance NA (being evaluated as part of future River Ridge development) N End-of-Pipe NA (being evaluated as part of future River Ridge development) N Restoration Stream Restoration stabilize the streambank and restore the riparian corridor to improve stream health and reduce sediment and pollutant loadings NON-STRUCTURAL NA (covered under Citywide Programs and Buildings in the SFHA) N 1 Likelihood of the potential solution to meet the Economic (Eco), Environmental (Env) and Social (Soc) Criteria from the SWMP 2 Pursue as a Promising Solution if likely to meet all 3 criteria IX. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP(S) Evaluate the feasibility of stream restoration as part of Phase 2 of this SWMP Further study of [list specific solutions] be funded and undertaken on a parallel path but separate from this SWMP No further study of source, conveyance or end-of-pipe solutions at this time. Recommend waiting on findings from the River Ridge Commerce Center to determine if further evaluation is needed. 16

17 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) PROBLEM & SOLUTION SUMMARY WORKSHEET I. PROBLEM NAME Waverly IV. MAJOR WATERSHED Lick Run II. III. PROBLEM AREA NUMBER(S) 96, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 142, 183 PROBLEM TYPE(S) Building Flooding or in SFHA Drainage Issue Erosion Maintenance Riverine Flooding Street Flooding Restrictive Structure V. CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER PROBLEM AREA(S) NA VI. COUNCIL DISTRICT(S) & COUNCILOR(S) City Council District #2 represented by Ed Zastawny VII. PROBLEM DEFINED This area is in a low-lying area and the homes, streets, and yards frequently flood. Water is unable to drain from the area due to undersized and unmaintained culverts under the railroad. 17

18 18

19 VIII. SCREENING OF POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S) Likely Meets Criteria (Y/N) 1 Pursue STRUCTURAL Eco Env Soc (Y/N) 2 Source Green Infrastructure integrate porous pavement and bioretention into public streetscape; develop cost-share program to promote porous pavement, rain gardens, and rainwater harvesting on private property Conveyance Grey Infrastructure widen and replace existing culvert pipes under railroad Diversion Structure divert stormwater to Mill Creek watershed Y Y N N End-of-Pipe Stormwater Pond meander stream and retrofit or resize existing ponds or add additional ponds upstream (Elks Golf Course potential location) to accommodate more stormwater Restoration Stream Restoration replace natural streambed of ditch to improve water quality, slow water, capture debris, and wildlife habitat NON-STRUCTURAL a) Voluntary Acquisition and/or Floodproofing Program implement a cost-share program for structures that frequently flood (outside the 1% annual chance of flooding) b) See Citywide Programs N 1 Likelihood of the potential solution to meet the Economic (Eco), Environmental (Env) and Social (Soc) Criteria from the SWMP 2 Pursue as a Promising Solution if likely to meet all 3 criteria IX. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP(S) Evaluate the feasibility of green infrastructure, grey infrastructure, stormwater ponds, stream restoration, and a voluntary acquisition/floodproofing program as part of Phase 2 of this SWMP Further study of [list specific solutions] be funded and undertaken on a parallel path but separate from this SWMP No further study of diverting the stormwater to Mill Creek watershed at this time. This solution is socially unacceptable and may create a problem (or make an existing problem worse) in the neighboring watershed. 19

20 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) PROBLEM & SOLUTION SUMMARY WORKSHEET I. PROBLEM NAME Woodland Court IV. MAJOR WATERSHED Lancassange Creek II. III. PROBLEM AREA NUMBER(S) 3, 4, 5, 43, 85, 172, 175, 185 PROBLEM TYPE(S) Building Flooding or in SFHA Drainage Issue Erosion Maintenance Riverine Flooding Street Flooding Restrictive Structure V. CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER PROBLEM AREA(S) Problems may be addressed on the Buildings in the SFHA Solution Summary Worksheet. VI. COUNCIL DISTRICT(S) & COUNCILOR(S) City Council District #5 represented by Lisa Noel-Gill VII. PROBLEM DEFINED This area is located in the Woodland Court Tributary floodplain and as a result has ponding in the street and standing water in low-lying areas. 20

21 21

22 VIII. SCREENING OF POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S) Likely Meets Criteria (Y/N) 1 Pursue STRUCTURAL Eco Env Soc (Y/N) 2 Source Green Infrastructure integrate porous pavement and bioretention into public streetscape; develop cost-share program to promote porous pavement, rain gardens, and rainwater harvesting on private property Conveyance Grey Infrastructure replace culvert and elevate road Grey Infrastructure install pipe through levee opening to drain stormwater into Mill Creek watershed Y N N N End-of-Pipe Stormwater Pond creation of a wetlands and flood mitigation structure (City process of acquiring large parcel at Woodland Court and Logan Lane) Restoration Stream Restoration restore riparian corridor to improve stream habitat, water quality, and prevent further erosion of streambank NON-STRUCTURAL NA (covered under Citywide Programs and Buildings in the SFHA) N 1 Likelihood of the potential solution to meet the Economic (Eco), Environmental (Env) and Social (Soc) Criteria from the SWMP 2 Pursue as a Promising Solution if likely to meet all 3 criteria IX. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP(S) Evaluate the feasibility of green infrastructure, grey infrastructure (culvert), stormwater pond, and stream restoration as part of Phase 2 of this SWMP Further study of [list specific solutions] be funded and undertaken on a parallel path but separate from this SWMP No further study of the grey infrastructure (pipe through levee opening) at this time. This solution is socially unacceptable and may create a problem (or make an existing problem worse) in the neighboring watershed. The receiving area is a wetland area as identified by the NWI. 22

23 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) PROBLEM & SOLUTION SUMMARY WORKSHEET I. PROBLEM NAME Lick Run IV. MAJOR WATERSHED Lick Run II. III. PROBLEM AREA NUMBER(S) 73, 90, 94, 120 PROBLEM TYPE(S) Building Flooding or in SFHA Drainage Issue Erosion Maintenance Riverine Flooding Street Flooding Restrictive Structure V. CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER PROBLEM AREA(S) Problems may be addressed on the Buildings in the SFHA Solution Summary Worksheet. VI. COUNCIL DISTRICT(S) & COUNCILOR(S) City Council District #4 represented by Connie Sellers VII. PROBLEM DEFINED This area is located in the Lick Run floodplain and experiences building flooding and drainage issues. Undersized culverts may be contributing to the problem as well. 23

24 24

25 VIII. SCREENING OF POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S) Likely Meets Criteria (Y/N) 1 Pursue STRUCTURAL Eco Env Soc (Y/N) 2 Source Green Infrastructure integrate porous pavement and bioretention into public streetscape; develop cost-share program to promote porous pavement, rain gardens, and rainwater harvesting on private property Conveyance Grey Infrastructure replace existing culverts at Coopers Lane and Hamburg Pike End-of-Pipe Stormwater Pond add upstream detention to provide some flood relief N Y N N Restoration NA N NON-STRUCTURAL NA (covered under Citywide Programs and Buildings in the SFHA) N 1 Likelihood of the potential solution to meet the Economic (Eco), Environmental (Env) and Social (Soc) Criteria from the SWMP 2 Pursue as a Promising Solution if likely to meet all 3 criteria IX. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP(S) Evaluate the feasibility of green infrastructure and grey infrastructure as part of Phase 2 of this SWMP Further study of [list specific solutions] be funded and undertaken on a parallel path but separate from this SWMP No further study of adding upstream ponds for flood relief at this time. The drainage area is large and would require a substantial pond to make a difference. The Problem Area is also located in the floodplain. 25

26 Jeffersonville Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) PROBLEM & SOLUTION SUMMARY WORKSHEET I. PROBLEM NAME Mill Creek IV. MAJOR WATERSHED Mill Creek II. III. PROBLEM AREA NUMBER(S) 84, 91, 147, 192 PROBLEM TYPE(S) Building Flooding or in SFHA Drainage Issue Erosion Maintenance Riverine Flooding Street Flooding Restrictive Structure V. CROSS REFERENCE TO OTHER PROBLEM AREA(S) NA VI. COUNCIL DISTRICT(S) & COUNCILOR(S) City Council District #5 represented by Lisa Noel-Gill VII. PROBLEM DEFINED This area is has streambank erosion and drainage issues that may by the result of an undersized culvert and lowlying area. 26

27 27

28 VIII. SCREENING OF POTENTIAL SOLUTION(S) Likely Meets Criteria (Y/N) 1 Pursue STRUCTURAL Eco Env Soc (Y/N) 2 Source Green Infrastructure integrate porous pavement and bioretention into public streetscape; develop cost-share program to promote porous pavement, rain gardens, and rainwater harvesting on private property Conveyance Grey Infrastructure replace culvert structure and elevate road End-of-Pipe NA N Restoration Stream Restoration stabilize the streambank and restore the riparian corridor to improve stream health and reduce sediment and pollutant loadings NON-STRUCTURAL NA (covered under Citywide Programs) N 1 Likelihood of the potential solution to meet the Economic (Eco), Environmental (Env) and Social (Soc) Criteria from the SWMP 2 Pursue as a Promising Solution if likely to meet all 3 criteria IX. RECOMMENDED NEXT STEP(S) Evaluate the feasibility of green infrastructure, grey infrastructure, and stream restoration as part of Phase 2 of this SWMP Further study of [list specific solutions] be funded and undertaken on a parallel path but separate from this SWMP No further study of [list specific solutions as well as reason] at this time. 28