A NEW METHOD FOR EVALUATING PRIMARY CLARIFIERS Alex Ekster and Cristina Pena San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant City of San Jose
|
|
- Clementine Parks
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A NEW METHOD FOR EVALUATING PRIMARY CLARIFIERS Alex Ekster and Cristina Pena San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant City of San Jose ABSTRACT A new method has been developed for evaluating primary clarifiers that examines the individual effect of concentration of non-settleable solids, detention time, clarifier depth, sludge blanket depth, and design features of the clarifier on removal efficiency. This method was successfully used to determine priorities for clarifier improvements at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SC WPCP). Maintaining the sludge blanket level within a narrow range ( m (5 5.5 ft)) was found to be the most cost-effective method for increasing removal efficiency. KEY WORDS: PRIMARY TREATMENT, REMOVAL EFFICIENCY, SLUDGE BLANKET, CONTROL INTRODUCTION Primary clarification is one of the oldest methods of wastewater treatment and it is still popular today due to its simplicity and low operational costs. Primary clarification is commonly followed by more advanced treatment such as biological and/or filtration treatment. An increase of primary clarification removal efficiency (RE) usually leads to a reduction of air demand for activated sludge process, a decrease of solids loading on secondary clarifiers and waste activated
2 sludge thickeners, and an increase in digester gas production. RE is calculated using the following equation: C inf C eff RE = 100 * (1) C inf The efficiency of primary treatment has been traditionally assessed by solids removal efficiency and compared to the hydraulic loading rate. Using the traditional approach for assessing clarifier performance, the solids removal efficiency (RE) was compared to the hydraulic loading rate (Figure 1). The scattered data did not reveal any correlation between hydraulic loading and removal efficiency. Similar observations have been made by other researchers (Walberg et.al., 1997). It was hypothesized that the absence of a correlation could be explained by the fact that RE is affected by a number of factors such as the concentration of non-settleable solids, sludge blanket depth, and design features of the clarifier. Thus, the cumulative effect of these factors on RE may exceed the effect of hydraulic loading.
3 100 TSS Removal Efficiency, % R 2 = Hydraulic Loading, m 3 /d-m 2 Figure 1. The effect of hydraulic loading rate on TSS removal efficiency. METHODS AND MATERIALS In order to evaluate the effect of concentration of non-settleable solids, sludge blanket depth, and design features of the clarifier on RE, it was decided to consider RE the product of four removal efficiencies: Removal Efficiency = RE1 * RE2 * RE3 * RE4 (2) Removal Efficiency 1(RE1) depends only on the fraction of non-settleable solids; Removal Efficiency 2 (RE2) depends on the clarifier design, short-circuiting and sludge blanket level; Removal Efficiency 3 (RE3) depends on hydraulic loading; and Removal Efficiency 4 (RE4) depends on clarifier flocculation ability. A method was developed to determine RE1-RE4.
4 RE1 RE1 is calculated using the following equation: C inf C ult/inf RE1 = 100 * (3) C inf where C inf is the concentration of TSS in primary influent and C ult/inf is the ultimate TSS equal to the concentration of non-settleable solids in primary influent supernatant after three hours of settling in a glass jar. RE1 does not depend on clarifier design nor on hydraulic conditions, therefore, RE1 can be increased only by chemical addition. Ultimate TSS was determined by measuring non-settleable solids concentration in the supernatant after quiescent settling of primary influent in a glass vessel 10 cm (4 inches) in diameter and 20 cm (8 inches) deep. Figure 2 shows the supernatant TSS results from samples collected from primary influent after settling 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours in a jar. Based on this test, it was determined that ultimate non-settleable TSS would be best represented after 3 hours of settling instead of the 1 hour settling time called for in Standard Methods (Section 2540F.3.b;AWWA, 1992).
5 Total Suspended Solids, mg/l Detention Time, minutes Figure 2. Ultimate non-settleable solids after 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours settling. RE2 RE2 is calculated using the following equation: C inf C eff RE 2 = 100 * (4) C inf C column where C inf is the concentration of TSS primary influent, C eff is the concentration of TSS in primary effluent, and C column is the concentration of TSS column supernatant after settling for a given detention time.
6 The settling column test is used to determine the maximum amount of solids that can be removed without interference from φ =0.1m 0101 hydraulic short-circuiting, sludge blanket resuspension or flocculation (deflocculation). Since solids removal depends on the depth of the settling tank; the height of the column (Figure 3) built for this test was exactly equal to the clarifier depth in the main part of the clarifier (downstream of the hopper). RE2 can be improved by retrofitting existing clarifiers(change weir design) and/or by optimizing sludge blanket depth and sludge withdrawal operation. H=2.4m Usually, improvement of RE2 is the most cost effective way to improve overall removal efficiency because it can be done without chemical addition or construction of new clarifiers. Sampling port Figure 3. Settling Column.
7 Visual observations and analytical testing indicated that the optimization of the sludge blanket height could improve RE2. Visual observation indicated that the sludge stored in the hopper was resuspended by turbulence created by the inflow at the head of the clarifier. Preliminary tests (see Figure 4) confirmed that sludge is resuspended and re-distributed along the length of the clarifier, although the effect of the resuspension on effluent quality, wasted sludge concentration, and RE2 was still unknown. Total Suspended Solids, mg/l Minimum Daily Flow Peak Daily Flow Length of the Clarifier, meter Figure 4. Suspended solids profile along the length of the primary clarifier. Therefore, in order to understand the effect of the sludge blanket on effluent quality and RE2, two parallel clarifiers with different sludge blanket heights were tested. In the first clarifier, the sludge blanket was maintained at 1.37 m (4.5 ft) above the hopper floor; in the second clarifier the sludge blanket was maintained at 2.13 m (7 ft) above the hopper floor. Influent and effluent samples were collected and measured for TSS, BOD, and soluble BOD using Standard Methods (AWWA, 1992). In addition, the effect of the sludge blanket height on wasted sludge was
8 determined by measuring the sludge concentration when the sludge blanket height was at various levels above the hopper floor. RE3 RE3 reflects the effect of detention time (hydraulic loading) on overall removal efficiency. RE3 is calculated using the following equation: C inf C column RE 3 = 100 * (5) C inf C ult/baffle where C inf is the concentration of TSS in primary influent, C column is the concentration of TSS of primary influent supernatant after settling for a given detention time in the column and C ult/baffle is the non-settleable solids in primary influent collected downstream of the inlet baffle. RE3 can be increased by chemical addition to increase settling velocity and constructing new clarifiers to increase detention time. RE4 RE4 reflects the ability of solids to flocculate or deflocculate in the clarifier. RE4 is calculated using the following equation: C inf C ult/baffle RE4 = 100 * (6) C inf C ult/inf
9 where C inf is the concentration of TSS in primary influent, C ult/inf is ultimate TSS equal to the concentration of non-settleable solids in primary influent supernatant after three hours of settling in a glass jar and C ult/baffle is ultimate TSS in primary influent collected downstream of the inlet baffle. RE4 can be increased by chemical addition or installation of flocculation baffles. Clarifier Description The primary clarifiers evaluated at the SJ/SC WPCP are rectangular clarifiers and have fully extended baffles in front of the inlet that run across the width of the clarifier so that influent flows over the baffle (Figure 5). Flights move sludge to the hopper located at the head of the clarifier. The sludge blanket is maintained between 1.5 m ( 5 ft) and 1.8 m (6 ft) above the hopper floor during the day and up to 2.1 m (7 ft) at night. Sludge is periodically withdrawn by a centrifugal pump and sent to anaerobic digesters. Influent channel weir Influent 2.44 m Effluent Hopper Inlet port baffle 1.22 m Sludge Withdrawal Pump 63.4 m Figure 5. Diagram of Primary Clarifiers at SJ/SC Water Pollution Control Plant
10 RESULTS Analytical Testing The total variation of grab samples was calculated using multiple regression analysis from grab samples collected from the same primary influent channel at two locations 5 feet apart. These samples were collected within 2 minutes of each other. Analytical variance for TSS was calculated from duplicate samples analyzed by the SJ/SC WPCP Process Lab; laboratory analytical precision was found to be better than Standard Methods (AWWA, 1992). The sampling error was calculated using the additive property of variances: s 2 = s s 2 2 so that, s 1 2 = s 2 - s 2 2 (7) (8) where s is the total variance, s 1 is the variance due to sampling and s 2 is the variance due to analytical analysis (Shernam et. al., 1996). Standard deviations for RE1 was calculated using the following equation: (y 1 y ) 2 σ = (9) n - 1 Standard deviation for overall removal efficiency and RE2-RE4 values may depend on hydraulic load and cannot be considered as random values. As a result, instead of using equation 9, the standard deviation was calculated by the method described by Berthouex and Brown (1994) using partial differentials for each variable multiplied by the variance. For example the standard deviation of RE3 was calculated by the following formula:
11 σ RE3 = θ 2 inf σ 2 inf + θ 2 ult/baffle σ 2 ull/baffle + θ 2 column σ 2 column (10) where θ inf is the partial derivative δre3/δc inf and the sensitivity coefficient for influent TSS, θ ult/baffle is the partial derivative δre3/δc ult/baffle and the sensitivity coefficient for TSS ultimate/baffle, and θ column is the partial derivative δre3/δc column and is the sensitivity coefficient for TSS column. Table 1 summarizes the standard deviations of the water quality parameters as well as for removal efficiencies. Table 1. Standard deviation for influent, effluent TSS samples, and RE1 through RE4. Standard Deviation Water Quality Parameter No. Samples Sampling Analytical TOTAL Influent TSS, mg/l Effluent TSS, mg/l Ultimate TSS, mg/l Column TSS, mg/l Total Removal Efficiency, % 19 4 RE1, % 9 10 RE2, % 4 10 RE3, % 16 6 RE4, % 3 7
12 RE1 Results for non-settleable solids and RE1 calculated from wet and dry seasons are summarized in Table 2. Table 2. RE1 during dry summer weather and wet winter weather. Non-Settleable Solids, mg/l RE1, % Wet Season Dry Season Wet Season Dry Season Mean Median Min Max Effect of diurnal variation on TSS ult/influent and RE1 are shown in Table 3. Table 3. Results for RE1: minimum daily flow and peak daily flow. Non-Settleable Solids, mg/l RE1, % Minimum Daily Flow Peak Daily Flow Minimum Daily Flow Peak Daily Flow Mean Median Min Max RE2 Results of TSS column and RE2 are given in Table 4.
13 Table 4. RE2 using a quiescent settling column. Hydraulic Loading m 3 /d-m 2 Clarifier Effluent mg/l Total Suspended Solids Quiescent Settling Column mg/l RE2, % The effect of the sludge blanket height on primary effluent is shown in Figure 6 and on wasted sludge is shown in Figure 7. Percent Difference, % Hydraulic Loading Rate 32.6 m3/d-m2(800 gpd/ft2) 73.3 m3/d-m2(1800 gpd/ft2) TSS sbod BOD Liquid H2S Effluent Water Quality, mg/l Figure 6. Deterioration of effluent quality with an increase of sludge depth in the hopper from 1.4 m to 2 m.
14 Sludge Total Solids, % R 2 = Sludge Blanket depth, m Figure 7. Effect of sludge depth on the concentration of sludge pumped from primary clarifiers. RE 3 As mentioned earlier RE3 depends on the non-settleable solids and hydraulic loading. RE3 is calculated using equation 5. Since it was found that at lower sludge blanket levels RE2 is essentially 100% and the column test is labor intensive, it will be more convenient to use clarifier effluent to calculate RE3. Substituting C eff in equation 5 in place of C column, RE3 will be: C inf C effluent RE 3 = 100 * (11) C inf C ult/baffle Figure 8 shows RE3 for the clarifiers during the dry summer and wet winter weather.
15 Removal Efficiency 3, % R 2 = 0.84 Winter Summer Hydraulic Loading, m 3 /d-m 2 Figure 8. Effect of hydraulic loading on RE3 during wet winter weather and dry summer weather. RE4 Results of flocculation (deflocculation) tests are shown in Table 5. Table 5. Sample Location Non-Settleable Solids, mg/l Influent 53 Before Baffle 63 Downstream of 66 Baffle Effluent 63
16 BOD Removal Equations similar to equations 3 through 6 were used to determine the removal of particulate BOD. RE1 and RE3 were slightly lower for particulate BOD than for TSS since settleability of inorganic material was a little better than organic. DISCUSSION Analytical Testing The standard deviation of the measured TSS is fairly high due to analytical and sampling errors, although those errors according to Standard Methods(1994) were in the normal range. The overall removal efficiency standard deviation is 4%. Individual standard deviations (RE1-RE4) are between 6% and 10%. It is believed that no less than 3 tests should be performed for determining individual efficiencies in order to gain confidence in the results. RE1 On average RE1 was 75%. The presence of non-settleable particles in primary influent at the SJ/SC WPCP on average reduces overall efficiency of primary clarifiers by 25% (Table 2). Statistical analysis revealed that RE1 varies by as much as 34%. The variations were not associated with diurnal flow variation or with wet weather conditions (Table 3). Since RE1 does not depend on clarifier design nor on hydraulic conditions, the only option considered to increase RE1 was chemical addition.
17 RE2 Determined at different hydraulic loading, RE2 was always 100% when sludge level in the hopper was below 1.7 m (5.5 ft). This indicated that clarifiers were properly designed and shortcircuiting, even if it existed, did not have any effect on the removal efficiency. An increase of sludge level in the hopper above 2.0 m (6.5 ft), however, reduced RE2 by as much as 15%. Calculated total BOD removal efficiency showed that an increase of sludge level above 2.0 m (6.5 ft) reduced overall BOD RE by as much as 28%. Reduction of BOD removal efficiency was partially caused by an increase of particulate BOD associated with TSS. In addition, effluent soluble BOD was higher than influent soluble BOD due to solubilization of particulate BOD stored in the hopper (Figure 6) and that process had detrimental affect on overall BOD removal efficiency. In addition, the higher sludge blanket also increased the generation of H 2 S by 50%. Conversely, if the sludge blanket was maintained below 1.4 m (4.5 ft), concentration of withdrawn sludge reduced drastically (Figure 7) and potentially could cause digestion problems since primary sludge is pumped directly to the digesters. RE3 Figure 8 showed that an increase of hydraulic loading rate by a factor of 3(from 35 to 105 m 3 /dm 2 ) reduces efficiency by 40-45% (from 90% to 50%) during wet winter weather. No correlation between RE3 and hydraulic loading which ranged between 35 m 3 /d-m 2 and 75 m 3 /dm 2, was observed during dry summer weather. The difference in performance between winter and summer months could be caused by water temperature that differs by 12 F between summer and winter. A decrease in water temperature caused a decrease in settling velocity so the effect of hydraulic loading on removal efficiency is more pronounced during wintertime.
18 RE4 Comparing non-settleable solids in samples collected from the influent channel, before the inlet baffle, downstream of the inlet baffle, and in the effluent, revealed that ultimate TSS didn t change in the clarifier, indicating that neither flocculation nor deflocculation occur in the clarifier (see Table 5). Options to increase RE4, such as chemical addition and installation of flocculation baffles, were also considered. CONCLUSION A new method has been developed for evaluating and optimizing primary clarifiers that examines the individual effect of concentration of non-settleable solids, detention time, clarifier depth, sludge blanket depth, and design features of the clarifier. RE1 depends only on a fraction of the non-settleable solids. On average RE1 was 75 ±10%. Variation of RE1 had no correlation with diurnal flow variation nor with wet weather conditions. RE2 depends on the clarifier design, short-circuiting and sludge blanket level. RE2 was always 100% when the sludge level in the hopper was below 1.7 m (5.5 ft). As sludge depth increased, the effluent BOD, both soluble and total, and TSS start to increase. On the other hand a decrease of sludge depth below 1.4 m (4.5 ft) reduced the concentration of waste sludge. RE3 depends on hydraulic loading. An increase of hydraulic loading rate by a factor of 3(from 35 to 105 m 3 /d-m 2 ) reduces RE3 by 40-45% (from 90% to 50%) during wet winter weather. No correlation between RE3 and hydraulic loading, which ranged
19 between 35 m 3 /d-m 2 and 75 m 3 /d-m 2, was observed during dry summer weather. Difference between seasonal performance is believed to be associated with temperature. RE4 depends on clarifier flocculation ability. Comparing non-settleable solids in samples collected from the influent channel, before the inlet baffle, downstream of the inlet baffle, and in the effluent, revealed that ultimate TSS didn t change in the clarifier, indicating that neither flocculation nor deflocculation occur in the clarifier. Using the described method of calculating RE1-RE4, the effect of each of the following factors can be compared: influent matrix, operational parameters, and specifics of clarifier design on overall RE. As a result an opportunity is provided to determine priorities for RE improvements. For the SJ/SC WPCP maintaining the sludge blanket level within a narrow range ( m (5 5.5 ft)) seems to be the most cost-effective method for increasing RE. If further increase of efficiency is needed, the described method of removal efficiency evaluation will be used to choose among the remaining options: chemical addition, construction flocculation baffles or constructing new clarifiers. REFERENCES AWWA, APHA, WEF (1992) Standard Methods: For The Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18 th edition. P.M. Berthouex and L. C. Brown. (1994). Statistics for Environmental Engineers. CRC Press, Inc. Metcalf & Eddy and G. Tchobanoglous (1991). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, and Reuse. 3 rd Edition. McGraw-Hill. E.J. Wahlberg, J.K. Wang, and M.S. Merrill (1997). Primary Sedimentation: It s Performing Better Than You Think. Proc Wat Environ Fed 70 th Annual Conf & Expo. Vol.1, pp
WASTEWATER TREATMENT (1)
Wastewater Engineering (MSc program) WASTEWATER TREATMENT (1) Prepared by Dr.Khaled Zaher Assistant Professor, Public Works Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University Wastewater Flow
More informationSanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil)
Sanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil) Prepared by Dr.Khaled Zaher Assistant Professor, Public Works Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University Wastewater Flow
More informationSETTLING REVIEW CHECKLIST
SETTLING REVIEW CHECKLIST Water Quality Wastewater Technical Review and Guidance FACILITY NAME CONSULTING ENGINEER DATE Water/Wastewater/#5.73, May 2001 SITE INSPECTION (DATE & INSPECTOR) PLANNING OR DESIGN
More informationMaking Clarifiers Do More For Less. Hany Gerges, Ph.D, PE July 31, 2015
Making Clarifiers Do More For Less Hany Gerges, Ph.D, PE July 31, 2015 2014 2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. Presentation Agenda 1 Background 2 Grit Removal Technology 3 Primary Clarifiers 4 Experience
More informationCopies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS Project No.: April 10, Task A 3100
MEMO To: Jeff Pelz (West Yost) Kathryn Gies (West Yost) Copies: Mark Hildebrand (NCA) ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 200 Harvard Mills Square Suite 430 Wakefield Massachusetts 01880 Tel 781 224 4488 Fax 781 224 3033
More informationCFD Analysis of Clarifier Performance With and Without Energy Dissipating Inlet
CFD Analysis of Clarifier Performance With and Without Energy Dissipating Inlet Figure 1: Energy Dissipating Inlet (LA-EDI) Introduction To estimate performance enhancements resulting from the use of an
More informationWaste Water treatment
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Environmental Engineering (ECIV 4324) Instructor: Dr. Abdelmajid Nassar Lect. 24-25 Waste Water treatment 1 Composition
More informationCTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment
CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment W2c Primary sedimentation Jules van Lier The screened and de-gritted sewage is further conveyed towards the biological treatment step. Can we remove some part of
More informationActivated Sludge Process Control:
2015 Pacific Water Conference Activated Sludge Process Control: What s Important and How It s Easily Implemented February 2015 Presentation takeaways 1. MCRT/SRT is the only way to control the activated
More informationCHAPTER 10 PRELIMINARY TREATMENT
CHAPTER 10 PRELIMINARY TREATMENT TM 5-814-3/AFM 88-11, Volume III 10-1. General considerations. Preliminary treatment of wastewater includes screening, grinding, grit removal, flotation, equilization,
More informationDefinition separation of unstable and destabilized suspended solids from a suspension by the force of gravity
SEDIMENTATION-1 TEKNOLOGI PENGOLAHAN LIMBAH Definition separation of unstable and destabilized suspended solids from a suspension by the force of gravity 1 Applications in Wastewater Treatment grit removal
More informationSMCSD Headworks, Primary and Secondary Treatment Pre-Design
Technical Memorandum SMCSD Headworks, Primary and Secondary Treatment Pre-Design Water andenvironment Subject: Prepared For: Prepared by: Reviewed by: SMCSD Mark Takemoto, Dennis Gellerman Steve Clary
More informationPhysical water/wastewater treatment processes
Physical water/wastewater treatment processes Tentative schedule (I) Week 1: Introduction Week 2: Overview of water/wastewater treatment processes Week 3: Major contaminants (Chemicals and pathogens) Week
More informationA SITE-SPECIFIC TOOL FOR OPTIMIZING FINAL CLARIFIER DESIGN AND OPERATION
A SITE-SPECIFIC TOOL FOR OPTIMIZING FINAL CLARIFIER DESIGN AND OPERATION Sam Jeyanayagam, Ph.D., P.E., BCEE Malcolm Pirnie Inc., 1900 Polaris Parkway, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43240 Phone: (614) 430-2611
More informationLiquid Stream Fundamentals: Grit Removal
FACT SHEET Liquid Stream Fundamentals: Grit Removal Grit removal is an essential component of the wastewater treatment process. Not only does the removal of grit help protect downstream equipment from
More information1. Overview 2 2. Definitions 2 3. Laboratory Testing Criteria 2. A. Laboratory Qualifications 2. B. Analysis of TSS Samples 2. C.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Laboratory Protocol to Assess Total Suspended Solids Removal by a Hydrodynamic Sedimentation Manufactured Treatment Device January 25, 2013 Contents 1.
More informationNext-generation modeling tool helps you get the most from your clarifier
Clarifier Proce Next-generation modeling tool helps you get the most from your clarifier Alonso Griborio, Paul Pitt, and John Alex McCorquodale 52 W E & T w w w. w e f. o r g / m a g a z i n e 2008 Water
More informationATTACHMENT 1 GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION. BOD5 mg/l mg/l TSS mg/l mg/l NH3-N mg/l mg/l
ATTACHMENT 1 GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION 1. Facility Name: 2. Type of Facility: 3. Population Served: Present: Design: 4. Flow: Average Maximum Peak 5. Water Quality: Present Design Assumed Actual Source:
More informationMWMC Eugene-Springfield WPCF Facility Plan Secondary Clarifier Enhancement Alternatives
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 8 MWMC Eugene-Springfield WPCF Facility Plan Secondary Clarifier Enhancement Alternatives PREPARED FOR: COPIES FOR: PREPARED BY: SUBMITTED BY: DATE: Troy McAllister/MWMC Project
More informationAUTOMATIC SRT CONTROL
AUTOMATIC SRT CONTROL Alex Ekster Ph.D.,P.E.,D.E.E. - Ekster and Associates Address: 1904 Lockwood Ave. - Fremont, CA - 94539, USA - Tel: (510) 657-7066 - e-mail: alex.ekster@iname.com ABSTRACT PICTURE
More informationChapter 11. Secondary Clarifiers
ENVE 301 Environmental Engineering Unit Operations Chapter 11 Secondary Clarifiers Assist. Prof. Bilge Alpaslan Kocamemi Marmara University Department of Environmental Engineering Istanbul, Turkey 1 SECONDARY
More informationImproving Performance of Large Rectangular Secondary Clarifiers
Improving Performance of Large Rectangular Secondary Clarifiers S. Zhou, C. Vitasovic (Reid Crowther), J.A. McCorquodale (Univ. of New Orleans) and S. Lipke (Passaic Valley Sewerage Com.), M. DeNicola,
More informationNEW SOLUTION FOR PRIMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT; CLOTH MEDIA FILTRATION
NEW SOLUTION FOR PRIMARY WASTEWATER TREATMENT; CLOTH MEDIA FILTRATION Introduction John D. Dyson*, Aqua Aerobic Systems, Inc. 636 N. Alpine Rd, Loves Park, IL jdyson@aqua-aerobic.com Primary and Primary
More informationWASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 6. BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT MASTER PLAN 6. BUSINESS CASE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES A range of potential ammonia limits were identified for alternatives evaluation, as discussed in Section 2.2.5. This chapter
More informationDetermination of design criteria for UASB reactors as a wastewater pretreatment system in tropical small communities
International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 51-57, Spring 2004 Determination of design criteria for UASB reactors as a wastewater pretreatment system in tropical small
More informationFull Scale Testing to Demonstrate Anaerobic Selector Effect for Low Strength Wastewater
OWEA State Conference June 20, 2012 Full Scale Testing to Demonstrate Anaerobic Selector Effect for Low Strength Wastewater Presenters Bill Donohue NEORSD Bob Hrusovsky MWH Don Esping BC Easterly Plant
More information1. Overview 2 2. Definitions 2 3. Laboratory Testing Criteria 2. A. Laboratory Qualifications 2. B. Analysis of TSS Samples 2. C.
1 2 3 4 5 6 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Laboratory Protocol to Assess Total Suspended Solids Removal by a Filtration Manufactured Treatment Device January 18, 2013 7 8 9 10 11 12
More informationOPERATIONAL CHALLENGES AT THE KOORLONG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. Derek de Waal Kevin Murphy
OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES AT THE KOORLONG WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Paper Presented by : Derek de Waal Kevin Murphy Authors: Derek de Waal, Operations Manager, Gutteridge Haskins & Davey Pty Ltd Kevin Murphy,
More informationLAKESIDE Water Purification Since Bulletin #1218 Revised June Spiravac Clarifier. Peripheral Feed Center Takeoff Suction Sludge Removal
LAKESIDE Water Purification Since 98 Bulletin #8 Revised June 999 Peripheral Feed Center Takeoff Suction Sludge Removal Copyright Lakeside Equipment Corporation 999 The Spiraflo principle has been successfully
More informationUtilization of Dynamic Modeling to Evaluate and Design Secondary Clarifiers for the Muddy Creek WWTP
Utilization of Dynamic Modeling to Evaluate and Design Secondary Clarifiers for the Muddy Creek WWTP Michael D. Parker, PE Co-Authors: Joe Rohrbacher, PE Alonso Griborio, PE PhD Presented by Joe Rohrbacher,
More informationAppendix B-1. Design Calculations for Sewage Treatment Plant
APPENDIX B SEWERAGE FACILITIES Appendix B-1 Design Calculations for Sewage Treatment Plant Appendix. B.1 CAPACITY CALCULATION OF SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT 1 BASIC CONDITIONS 1.1 BASIC S (1) Name : Astana
More informationAn updated proposal for including further detail in the BSM2 PE calculation
An updated proposal for including further detail in the BSM2 PE calculation Krist V. Gernaey *, Ingmar Nopens, Darko Vrecko, Jens Alex and Jeremy Dudley * Center for Biochemical Engineering, Dept. of Chemical
More informationFAYOUM CITY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, DEVELOPMENT STAGES, CASE STUDY
FAYOUM CITY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT, DEVELOPMENT STAGES, CASE STUDY Ahmed El-Zayat, Environmental Engineering Group, Egypt Emaill: ahmed_el_zayat@yahoo.com Introduction This case study focuses on three
More informationUPGRADING GAZA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. Gaza City is populated with 550,000 inhabitants and it forms 45% of the Gaza strip population.
Gaza City Gaza City is populated with 550,000 inhabitants and it forms 45% of the Gaza strip population. Gaza City has the oldest wastewater system in Gaza Strip; it consists of some of 280 kilometers
More informationDOWNSTREAM DEFENDER TESTING USING MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTOCOL UTILIZING OK-110 FEED SAND
DOWNSTREAM DEFENDER TESTING USING MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROTOCOL UTILIZING OK-110 FEED SAND JULY 2002 Copyright 2001 H.I.L. Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. This report was
More informationNEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ABSTRACT C. Yang*, L. Zhou**, W. Luo***, and L. Johnson**** *Corstar International Corp. 111
More informationCEDAR CREEK Wastewater Treatment Facility
CEDAR CREEK Wastewater Treatment Facility Where does the waste originate Private homes Businesses from? Condominium complexes Nursing homes Apartments ANY DWELING THAT USES WATER AND IS CONNECTED TO THE
More informationThe Wastewater Insight
September 07 Volume 4.9 The Wastewater Insight RAIN RAIN GO AWAY Rain Rain go away How does rain impact the wastewater treatment plant? MYSTERY BUG OF THE MONTH We started this month out with a new Mystery
More informationStartup and Performance of the World s first Large Scale Primary Dissolved Air Floatation Clarifier ABSTRACT KEYWORDS INTRODUCTION
Startup and Performance of the World s first Large Scale Primary Dissolved Air Floatation Clarifier Bruce R. Johnson 1 *, Jennifer Phillips 2, Tim Bauer 3, Greg Smith 4, George Smith 5, John Sherlock 6
More informationDuffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant Technical Information
Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant Technical Information Plant History The Duffin Creek Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) is located on the northern shore of Lake Ontario in the City of Pickering
More informationPreparing for Technical Training: Essential Skills for Water/Wastewater Operators. Practice Tests
Practice Tests COURSE OUTLINE: Module # Name Practice Test included Module 1: Basic Math Refresher Module 2: Fractions, Decimals and Percents Module 3: Measurement Conversions Module 4: Linear, Area and
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS IAPMO GUIDE CRITERIA FOR
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS IAPMO GUIDE CRITERIA FOR WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR SYSTEM (WIS) FOR AN INTERACTIVE MECHANICAL WASTEWATER INTERCEPTOR IGC 245-2007a 1. PURPOSE
More informationWEFTEC.06. **Cobb County Water System, Marietta, Georgia
CHEMICALLY ENHANCED PRIMARY TREATMENT FOR A LARGE WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY ON A CONSTRICTED SITE - CONSIDERATIONS FOR DESIGN, START-UP, AND OPERATION ABSTRACT Jeffrey A. Mills, P.E., BCEE,* Roderick
More information(Original signatures are on file with official student records.)
To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Patricio Alejandro Moreno entitled Evaluation of Factors Responsible for High Effluent Suspended Solids Events in the Kuwahee Wastewater
More informationENVIRONMENTAL VISITATION CENTER ALEGRIA WWTP
ENVIRONMENTAL VISITATION CENTER ALEGRIA WWTP ENVIRONMENTAL VISITATION CENTER ALEGRIA WWTP The new CEDAE, offering to the public the Environmental Visitation Center at Alegria WWTP, seals its commitment
More informationENVE 301 Environmental Engineering Unit Operations
ENVE 301 Environmental Engineering Unit Operations Lecture 13 High Rate Settlers SPRING 2014 Assist. Prof. A. Evren Tugtas High Rate Clarification Refers to all processes that can be loaded at higher rate
More informationLEMNA BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESS LEMTEC TM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
LEMNA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. I n n o v a t i v e W a s t e w a t e r T r e a t m e n t S o l u t i o n s LEMTEC TM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESS LEMNA For more than 20 years, Lemna has been the world leader
More information2017 Annual Performance Report
Newcastle Water Pollution Control Plant The Regional Municipality of Durham Newcastle Water Pollution Control Plant Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA): 3-2189-87-946 Dated July 26, 1994 Amendments:
More informationPrimary filtration and primary effluent
FWRJ New Solution for Primary Wastewater Treatment: Cloth Media Filtration John D. Dyson Primary filtration and primary effluent cloth media filtration are both emerging technologies in wastewater treatment.
More informationProprietary AquaTron technology incorporates three (3) innovative features that increase its efficiency and reduces cost:
THE AQUATRON The Technology The AquaTron is the result of over twenty years of research, development, testing and practical experience. Using the principles of the activated sludge biological process,
More informationTREATMENT OF DOMESTIC WASTEWATER USING BIOLOGICAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE METHOD
ABSTRACT B6-319 Ly Thuong Kiet Street, Ward 15, District 11, HCMC TREATMENT OF DOMESTIC WASTEWATER USING BIOLOGICAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE METHOD Wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with 600 m 3 /day capacity
More informationCharacterization and assessment of Kullar Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant wastewaters
Environ Monit Assess (2008) 138:191 199 DOI 10.1007/s10661-007-9763-6 Characterization and assessment of Kullar Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant wastewaters Ayça N. Tekeli Ayla Arslan Received: 18 September
More informationInternational Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 4, No 5, 2015,
International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 4, No 5, 2015, 1330 1335 ISSN 2278-3687 (O) 2277-663X (P) TREATABILITY STUDY METHODOLOGY & APPLICATION Ms. Seema A. Nihalani Head and
More information75 th STREET WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADES PROJECT
75 th STREET WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT UPGRADES PROJECT Basis of Design Memorandum Design Memo No.: DM-7 (REVISED) Date: February 2005 Project/Task: 124487.001.420 Subject: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Hydraulic
More informationWastewater Treatment. Where does wastewater go when it leaves your house?
Wastewater Treatment Where does wastewater go when it leaves your house? Let s s take a look The process includes: Collection of wastewater Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment Solids Handling Influent
More informationOPTIMIZATION STUDY OF THE ST. MARY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
XCG File No.: 3-167-09-02 October 26, 2016 OPTIMIZATION STUDY OF THE ST. MARY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Prepared for: B.M. ROSS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED 62 North Street Goderich, Ontario N7A 2T4 Prepared
More informationPerformance Evaluation And Efficiency Assessment Of A Waste Water Treatment Plant A Case Study
Performance Evaluation And Efficiency Assessment Of A Waste Water Treatment Plant A Case Study M. Rajasekhar*, N. Venkat Rao**, Dr. T. Muralidhara Rao*** Dept.of Civil Engineering, Vardhaman College of
More informationrim-flo secondary Clarifier with Tow-Bro unitube sludge removal system
rim-flo secondary Clarifier with Tow-Bro unitube sludge removal system Flow distribution of mixed liquor is uniform around the basin circumference, density flow pattern is away from the effluent weir,
More informationMaximizing Secondary Wet Weather Capacity at the Columbia Boulevard Wastewater Treatment Plant
Maximizing Secondary Wet Weather Capacity at the Columbia Boulevard Wastewater Treatment Plant Adrienne Menniti1, Bruce Johnson1, Glen Daigger1, Samuel Jeyanayagam1, Lynne Chicoine1, Paul Suto2, Vu Han2,
More informationThe Municipality of North Grenville
A solution is required to increase the peak flow capacity of the Kemptville WPCP, a conventional activated sludge process, within a small footprint while maintaining good effluent quality. Location: Kemptville
More informationA SIMPLE SOLUTION TO BIG SNAIL PROBLEMS - A CASE STUDY AT VSFCD S RYDER STREET WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
A SIMPLE SOLUTION TO BIG SNAIL PROBLEMS - A CASE STUDY AT VSFCD S RYDER STREET WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Timothy R. Tekippe, P.E.,* Robert J. Hoffman, P.E.,* Ronald J. Matheson,** Barry Pomeroy** *Carollo
More informationCHAPTER 12 TRICKLING FILTER PLANTS
CHAPTER 12 TRICKLING FILTER PLANTS TM 5-814-3/AFM 88-11, Volume III 12-1. General considerations. Trickling filter plants have been justified by their low initial cost, low operating and maintenance costs,
More informationSIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES
SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES Oxidation ditches are very popular wastewater treatment processes for small to medium sized municipalities that
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER. 1 Objective. 2 Design Flows and Loads. Capital Regional District Core Area Wastewater Management Program
DISCUSSION PAPER Capital Regional District Core Area Wastewater Management Program Macaulay/McLoughlin Point Wastewater Treatment Plant Discussion Paper Liquid Process Alternatives Evaluation 034-DP-1
More informationModule 22 : Sludge Management
1 P age Module 22 : Sludge Management Lecture 36 : Sludge Management 2 P age 22.1 Introduction In the context of wastewater treatment residual is used to refer sludge. The term sludge refers to the solids
More informationSECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES
SECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES 8.1 PREAMBLE Table 8.1 below indicates the target ammonia concentrations for the Best Practicable and the Second Priority Levels of Control for the
More informationENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis
ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis ABSTRACT Oxidation ditches are very popular wastewater treatment
More informationAt the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection
OBG PRESENTS: At the Mercy of the Process Impacts of Nitrogen Removal Performance on WWTP Disinfection Ned Talbot, PE Tri-Association Conference 2018 8/30/18 9:00-9:30AM AGENDA Overview of Plant Processes
More informationWWTF Capacity Assessment Project
Wastewater Treatment Facility Evaluation The Richland WWTF was constructed in 1985 to provide primary and secondary treatment for the City's wastewater. Section 3 includes a general description of the
More informationA signed statement from the manufacturer listing the protocol requirements and indicating that all of the requirements were met or exceeded.
Protocol for Manufactured Hydrodynamic Sedimentation Devices for Total Suspended Solids Based on Laboratory Analysis Dated August 5, 2009, Revised December 15, 2009 The New Jersey Stormwater Management
More informationDissolved Air Flotation For Municipal Clarification and Thickening. WesTech
Dissolved Air Flotation For Municipal Clarification and Thickening WesTech Dissolved Air Flotation Proven Process Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) is an effective process for clarification and thickening
More informationPerformance Of UASB Reactor At Different Flow Rate Treating Sewage Wastewater
International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN( USA): IJCRGG ISSN : 0974-4290 Vol.5, No.2, pp 676-681, April-June 2013 ICGSEE-2013[14 th 16 th March 2013] International Conference on Global Scenario
More informationGeorgia Power Plant McDonough-Atkinson NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised May 2018
Georgia Power Plant McDonough-Atkinson NPDES Permit No. GA0001431 Revised May 2018 Purpose This updated (Plan) describes the additional procedures, safeguards and enhanced wastewater treatment measures
More informationSBR FOR LOW FLOW APPLICATIONS
SBR FOR LOW FLOW APPLICATIONS The Dutchland Sequencing Batch Reactor uses high quality precast concrete structures to handle all of the work of a continuous flow treatment system. All processes - biological
More informationISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX
ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX P r o v e n T e c h n o l o g y FLUIDYNE S ISAM IS A TOTAL TREATMENT SYSTEM incorporating BOD, TSS and nitrogen removal along with sludge reduction in an integrated system.
More informationSEWERAGE SYSTEM IN ULAANBAATAR
SEWERAGE SYSTEM IN ULAANBAATAR Brief introduction of Ulaanbaatar city Ulaanbaatar is the capital of Mongolia. Population - 1.35 million citizens /2015/ Elevation-1351m above sea level Occupies the area
More informationDewaterability of sludge digested in extended aeration plants using conventional sand drying beds
African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 9(29), pp. 4578-4583, 19 July, 21 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/ajb ISSN 1684 5315 21 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Dewaterability
More informationClient: City of Pontiac Project Name: Regional WWTP Feasibility Location: Pontiac, MI Project Number: Issue Date: October 23, 2006
Client: City of Pontiac Project Name: Regional WWTP Feasibility Location: Pontiac, MI Project Number: 13649553 Issue Date: October 23, 2006 Subject: WWTP Condition Assessment Auburn Plant 1. Grit Removal:
More informationMODELLING THE DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF A SECONDARY CLARIFIER TO A SEA WATER INCURSION AT THE RADFORD STW
MODELLING THE DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF A SECONDARY CLARIFIER TO A SEA WATER INCURSION AT THE RADFORD STW Burt, D. 1, Ganeshalingam, J. 1, Hammond, C. 2 and Egarr, D. 1 1 MMI Engineering Ltd, UK, 2 Hyder Consulting,
More informationGreater Kegalle Water Treatment Plant Kegalle, Sri Lanka
Greater Kegalle Water Treatment Plant Kegalle, Sri Lanka 1. Background information of the water treatment plant Kegalle is located about 80 Km East of Colombo and the Greater Kegalle water treatment plant
More informationZohul Hamza University of Basrah. Civil Engineering, Iraq
Experimental Works on Advanced Wastewater Treatment Zohul Hamza University of Basrah. Civil Engineering, Iraq Abstract This paper develops and demonstrates the solution for advanced wastewater treatment
More informationOregon Operators Conference Operator Math Workshop Module II
Oregon Operators Conference Operator Math Workshop Module II Lance Mason, Senior Operations Specialist August 16, 2018 Conversion Math Brief Review From Module I Conversions to Remember 8.34 lbs. / gallon
More informationSECTION 6.0 NEWPCC CENTRATE TREATMENT
SECTION 6.0 NEWPCC CENTRATE TREATMENT 6.1 CENTRATE FLOWS AND LOADS 6.1.1 Background The digested sludge dewatering system at the North End Water Pollution Control Centre (NEWPCC) operates on a continuous
More informationCEE 371 May 14, 2009 Final Exam
CEE 371 May 14, 2009 Final Exam Closed Book, two sheets of notes allowed Please answer questions 3, 6 and 7. In addition, answer either question 1 or 2, and answer either question 4 or 5. The total potential
More informationVortex Separator. May be more cost-effective pre-treatment devices than traditional wet or dry basins.
Description Vortex separators: (alternatively, swirl concentrators) are gravity separators, and in principle are essentially wet vaults. The difference from wet vaults, however, is that the vortex separator
More informationACTIFLO Process. For Wet Weather and Wastewater Treatment WATER TECHNOLOGIES
ACTIFLO Process For Wet Weather and Wastewater Treatment WATER TECHNOLOGIES ACTIFLO Microsand Ballasted Clarification Process Actiflo is a high rate, compact process developed by Veolia Water Technologies.
More informationlurnal Kej.AwamIiI.9Bil
lurnal Kej.AwamIiI.9Bil.2 1996 DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTER PROGRAMME FOR THE DESIGN OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES Part 5: Secondary Clarifier by Amat Sairin B. Demun Dept. of Hydraulics and
More informationOptimizing Clarifier Performance Are We Designing the Clarifiers Right?
Optimizing Clarifier Performance Are We Designing the Clarifiers Right? Jim Fitzpatrick Bikram Sabherwal, James Barnard, Mark Steichen ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS JANUARY 24-27, 2016
More informationOrange County Sanitation District. Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR) Pilot Plant Demonstration. Feb 2002 May Final Report (version 1.
Orange County Sanitation District Anaerobic Baffled Reactor () Pilot Plant Demonstration Feb 2002 May 2004 (version 1.3) Presented by Rupert Kruger March 2005 4132472 RK V1.3 March 2005 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
More informationThe Biowin Advantage
The Biowin Advantage Volume 2 Number 3 : July 2011 Using a Model Primary Settling Tank EnviroSim Associates McMaster Innovation Park 175 Longwood Road S Suite 114A Hamilton, ON L8P-0A1 Canada P: +1 (905)
More informationEXHIBIT 2:Optional Online Installation Re-entrainment/scour testing of the Terre Kleen18 Hydrodynamic Separator Stormwater Treatment unit per NJDEP
EXHIBIT 2:Optional Online Installation Re-entrainment/scour testing of the Terre Kleen18 Hydrodynamic Separator Stormwater Treatment unit per NJDEP Testing Protocol dated: August 25, 2009, as amended December
More informationHigh Performance. Uniform Distribution
Water Technologies Peripheral Feed - Peripheral Take-Off Clarifier Middle East Project was able to reduce the number of clarifier units from ten to six, providing a significant savings in capital cost.
More informationACTIFLO Process. For Wet Weather and Wastewater Treatment WATER TECHNOLOGIES
ACTIFLO Process For Wet Weather and Wastewater Treatment WATER TECHNOLOGIES ACTIFLO Microsand Ballasted Clarification Process Actiflo is a high rate, compact process developed by Veolia Water Technologies.
More informationCourse: Wastewater Management
Course: Wastewater Management Prof. M. M. Ghangrekar Questions 1 1. Describe advantages and disadvantages offered by the water carriage system. 2. What are the possible adverse effects when untreated or
More informationLowering The Total Cost Of Operation
Lowering The Total Cost Of Operation The system removes more solids than conventional clarification, so filters can run longer between backwash cycles. Fewer backwash cycles means less backwash water,
More information11. CDS Screen and the high-rate filtration method. using Specially-processed fibers of a material
11.CDS Screen and the high-rate filtration method using Specially-processed fibers of a material N. Horie 1, M.Kabata 2, K.Sano 3, S.Kanamori 4 Director, Chief Researcher,Senior Researcher 3, Researcher
More informationRECTILINEAR FLOW EFFLUENT TANK WALL LAUNDER. LAUNDER INFLUENT D. Peripheral-Feed Settling Tank, Spiral Flow EFFLUENT DISTRIBUTION WELL INFLUENT
7.17 SEDIMENTATION PARTIAL LIST OF SUPPLIERS Degremont-Cottrell Inc.; Dorr-Oliver Inc.; FMC Corp.; Dravo Corp.; Sybron Corp.; Edens Equipment Co.; Eimco Process Equipment; Envirex; General Filter Co.;
More informationA COMPARISON OF LABORATORY TESTING AND THEORETICAL ANALYSES OF SEDIMENT PROCESSES IN A SEPARATOR UNIT
A COMPARISON OF LABORATORY TESTING AND THEORETICAL ANALYSES OF SEDIMENT PROCESSES IN A SEPARATOR UNIT Amie N. Humphrey, E.I.T. Alden Research Laboratory Holden, Massachusetts 1 INTRODUCTION Laboratory
More informationThe oxidation index: a tool for controlling the activated sludge process
The oxidation index: a tool for controlling the activated sludge process A common approach to controlling the activated sludge process involves adjusting the amount of biomass in the system according to
More informationCASE STUDY: ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE BASE, AMBERLEY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
2007 Virotec International plc All rights reserved. A COMMERCIAL APPLICATION OF VIROSEWAGE TECHNOLOGY CASE STUDY: ROYAL AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE BASE, AMBERLEY SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT The ViroSewage Technology
More information