Decommissioning the North Korean Nuclear Facilities: Approaches and Costs 1
|
|
- Oscar Johnston
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Decommissioning the North Korean Nuclear Facilities: Approaches and Costs 1 Hui Zhang Managing the Atom Project Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 79 John F. Kennedy Street, Cambridge, MA ABSTRACT If the agreed objective of complete denuclearization of Korean peninsula is to be achieved, it can be expected that dismantling and ultimately decommissioning North Korean plutonium production facilities have to be proceeded. This paper will focus on decommissioning the 5 megawatt-electric (MWe) plutonium production reactor and the reprocessing plant. It explores and recommends the best decommissioning approaches to those nuclear facilities. It also provides a discussion of the decommissioning costs for these nuclear facilities. Decommissioning the 5 MWe Reactor D&D Approaches There are three main strategies for decommissioning of a nuclear facility: Immediate dismantling/decon, Deferred dismantling or Safe enclosure/safstor, and Entombment. 2 DECON. Immediate dismantling normally starts within a few years of the shutdown of the facility, giving time for transition to prepare for implementation of the decommissioning strategy. SAFSTOR. After removal of spent fuel and some peripheral items of equipment, the facility is kept in a state of safe enclosure for a period of 30 to 100 years before dismantling. This strategy requires control of the facility throughout the safe enclosure period to ensure the necessary level of safety. ENTOMB. Entombment involves encapsulating the facility on site and keeping it isolated until the radionuclides have decayed to levels that allow the site to be released from nuclear regulatory control. Given that the option of facility entombment would result in an endstate that is essentially equivalent to a near surface disposal facility which could be not accepted under the current regulations, entombment is not a recommended decommissioning option in current situation. However, it could be used as a form of extended safe storage which would 1 More details could be found in Matthew Bunn and Hui Zhang, Decommissioning North Korea s Nuclear Facilities: Issues, Options, and Costs, Forthcoming. 2 See, e.g., IAEA, Selection of decommissioning strategies: Issues and factors, Report by an expert group, IAEA-TECDOC-1478, IAEA, November
2 remove the entombment facility from the site to a waste disposal site. While a few small demonstration reactors have been entombed, no operators have proposed this option for any of the power reactors undergoing decommissioning. Essentially, decommissioning strategy selection is a selection between immediate and deferred dismantling. Experts around the world have already accumulated experience in the decommissioning of Magnox-type reactors similar to the North Korean 5 MWe reactor. There are 26 Magnox reactors in the United Kingdom, though only four of them are still operating and will soon be shut down. The only two U.K.-exported Magnox reactors, the Tokai-1 in Japan and the Latina in Italy, have been shut down. Also all nine UNGG power reactors (Uranium Natural Graphite Gas, a French design similar to U.K. Magnox, except that the fuel cladding was a magnesiumzirconium instead of a magnesium-aluminum alloy) in France and the sole exported UNGG in Spain (Venio) have been shut down. The term Gas Cooled Reactor (GCR) is used generally to refer to all of these first generation, carbon dioxide-cooled, graphite-moderated reactors, most of which are in the process of being decommissioned. The techniques and equipment for decommissioning full scale commercial GCR power plants have been tested and are available. Based on current GCR decommissioning plans, it may find some commons regarding to the key phases of the decommissioning. 1) it usually takes about 5-10 years for D&D planning. 2) it usually takes about 3-10 years for preparation of safestore. For DECON option, this period may be have an overlap with the safestore phase (as Japan s Tokai-1 case). 3)In term of timing, the major difference between DECON and SAFSTOR is at this phase in that the later has a much longer duration. 4) During the last phase taking about 3-10 years, the reactor and remaining building will be dismantled and demolished. The Site will be cleanup and released for alternative reuse. Consequently, it could take least 15 years to complete a DECON project and several decades for a SAFSTOR strategy. Currently most GCR reactors are selecting the SAFSTOR decommissioning option. The constraints associated with the lack of waste management system and funds could limit the North Korean strategies for decommissioning to deferred dismantling, which would require several decades to complete the D&D project. However, in decommissioning the North Korean nuclear facilities, not only are long-term safety and environmental issues emphasized, but also security aspects. To speed up North Korean denuclearization, these nuclear facilities, including the 5 MWe reactor, should be dismantled as soon as possible. For example, the 1994 Agreed Framework called for a complete dismantlement of the 5 MWe reactor and related facilities within 10 years, by which time a project to supply North Korea with two LWRs would have been completed. Such a timeframe will not be realistic. Based on the above discussion, even if the DECON strategy were employed, completing the D&D project would take least 15 years. Considering both the security concerns and the different decommissioning strategies, North Korea should find a way to permanently disable the reactor as quickly as possible that also fits in with a suitable decommissioning strategy. One such way could be to cocoon the reactor first, as the United States has been doing at its Hanford reactor site, which would effectively 2
3 disable the reactor, and then dismantle it after a period of safestore. U.S. decommissioning of the Hanford reactors provides a good example of the SAFSTOR approach. 3 In summary, applying the Hanford experience to the North Korean case, the North Korean 5 Mwe reactor could be cocooned within 5 years for a cost in the range of $20-30 million. The safestore period could last for decades (e.g years). Eventually, it could take about 3-10 years for the final stage of dismantling and site clearance. This approach would permanently disable the reactor within 5 years, while providing time for the regulators to determine the final disposal method and to allow radiation levels in the reactor cores to decay to a lower level. D&D Costs As discussed above, if U.S. decommissioning of the Hanford reactors can be used as a guide, decommissioning costs of North Korean 5 MWe reactor could be estimated. DOE has projected the total costs of various alternatives for decommissioning the Hanford reactors. In its Environmental Impact Statement for decommissioning of the Hanford reactors, DOE evaluated several decommissioning alternatives, including no action (leaving the reactors as they were); immediate one-piece removal (which would involve lifting the entire graphite block of the reactor onto a transporter, moving it elsewhere on the site, and dumping it into a trench for burial); safe storage followed by one-piece removal (same one-piece dumping idea after 75 years of SAFSTOR); safe storage followed by dismantlement (in which the reactor would be disassembled block by block after the 75-year SAFSTOR period, and the blocks similarly buried in a trench), and in situ decommissioning (essentially the ENTOMB approach). 4 DOE chose a period of SAFSTOR followed by one-piece disposal as the preferred alternative for implementation (though reportedly plans may be changing). The total cost for implementing this option for nine reactors was estimated to be $442 million ($467 million in 2007 dollars), or just over $50 million per reactor. Thus, if North Korean 5 MWe reactor is to apply Handford cocooning experience, the decommissioning cost could be around 50 MUSD. However, in practice it would be difficult to estimate the total decommissioning cost of the 5 MWe reactor with precision. For example, as can be seen in table 1, estimated decommissioning cost per reactor varies from $264 million (in the case of France s Chinon reactors) to over $1.6 billion (for Japan s Tokai-1 reactor). Morevoer, if the estimate of D&D costs is based on unit in dollars per MWe (i.e. a range of million USD per MWe as shown in table 1, then the decommissioning cost of the North Korean 5 MWe reactor could be estimated at around 4-70 MUSD. It is should be noted that while a variety of international studies estimate decommissioning costs in dollars per MWe, suggesting a linear relationship between a reactor s electrical capacity and the cost of decommissioning it, no such relationship leaps out from Table 1. Consequently, the decommissioning cost of the North Korean 5 MWe reactor could have a huge range, e.g., from a few tens million to over one billion. A serious estimate needs detailed engineering studies and further refined during the SAFSTOR. 3 U.S. Department of Energy, Surplus Reactor Final Disposition Engineering Evaluation, DOE/RL , Rev. 0 (Washington, DC: DOE, August 2005.) 4 See description and assessment in DOE, Surplus Reactor Final Disposition Engineering Evaluation. 3
4 country Table 1 : The Published Cost of GCR Decommissioning (in 2007 USD) Plant (Number of reactors) Capacity (MWe gross) Total cost Total cost in B USD (2007) M USD /MWe B USD/ reactor (2007) France Chinon (3) M MWe (2006) Spain Vendellos (1) MUSD b (2001) a Italy Latina (1) M Euro (2002) a Japan Tokai 1 (1) b USD (1998) a UK Calder Hall (4) c Berkeley (2) Bradwell (2) Chapelcross (4) Dungeness (2) Hinkley (2) Hunterston (2) Oldbury (2) Sizewell (2) Trawsfynydd (2) Wylfa (2) Note: a)for Spain s Vandellos reactor, published cost estimates do not include waste management costs, and hence were lower than other decommissioning cost estimates. See NEA, Decommissioning Nuclaer Power Plants Policies, Strategies and Costs, OECD b)cost estimates for Chinon, Latina and Tokai1- reactor decommissioning are based on Pierre Saverot presentation : Experiences in Decommissioning PUREX Reprocessing plants and Graphite Rectors, Workshop on Decommissioning North Korea s Nuclear Facilities, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., June c) cost estimates for all UK magnox reactors are from website of UK s Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, 4
5 Finally, the decommissioning cost could be reduced significantly by some factors. For example, if North Korea does not pursue complete decommissioning to a green field as the United Kingdom and Japan are doing. Moreover, since the labor cost could account for up to 50% of the total D&D cost, the decommissioning costs could be reduced significantly if North Korean are employed. On the other hand, some factors (e.g., poor safety conditions at the reactor build and auxiliary buildings) could increase the cost, however. Decommissioning the Reprocessing Plant D&D Approaches The reprocessing plant at Yongbyon will also be a major decommissioning project. In principle, as discussed above, there are three main strategies for decommissioning a reprocessing facility: DECON, SAFSTOR and Entombment. In practice, unlike the decommissioning strategy for the reactor, the SAFESTOR option would have no benefits in decommissioning a reprocessing plant. 5 In most cases, entombment is also not considered a reasonable option for the decommissioning of reprocessing facilities, since they are contaminated by alpha radionuclides with a long half-life. Thus, the most feasible strategy for decommissioning North Korean reprocessing plant would be a variation of the DECON option. The Eurochemic reprocessing plant 6 could be used as a model for decommissioning the DPRK s Radiochemical Laboratory. The Eurochemic reprocessing facility in Belgium was constructed between 1960 and It reprocessed 180 tons of natural and low-enriched and 30 tons of high-enriched uranium fuels from 1966 to After shutdown in 1974, the plant was decontaminated from 1975 to 1979 to keep it in a safe standby condition. The decision to decommission to a stage3 status was taken in A pilot project was carried out on two storage buildings in 1987 in order to test techniques and costs as well as to train personnel. Both buildings were emptied and decontaminated to background levels and demolished, the remaining concrete debris was disposed of as industrial waste and green field conditions restored. The main decommissioning project has been progressing since 1989 and is expected to take about 23 years ( ) to complete. The total decommissioning cost is estimated at about 200 million (in 2004). 7 The main process building is about 80 m long, 27 m wide and 30 m high. It consists of 40 main cells containing the chemical processing equipment. A total of 106 individual cells have to be dismantled. By the end of 2004, 43 cells had been dismantled to background levels; 20 cells were emptied; and equipment removal is in progress for 37 cells. The D& D activities have generated up to 4000 tonnes of waste. Thirty nine operators are involved in the decommissioning activities, 8 operators take care of the decontamination activities. All activities are assisted, supervised and managed by 12 supervising and management personnel. 8 5 IAEA, Decommissioning of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities, Safety Guide, No. WS-G-2.4, IAEA Jean-Marc Wolff, Eurochemic : Thirty-five years of international cooperation in the field of nuclear engineering: The chemical processing of irradiated fuels and the management of radioactive wastes, NEA/OECD, Paris, Pierre Saverot, Experiences in Decommissioning PUREX Reprocessing Plants and Graphite Rectors, op.cit. 8 See,e.g., The Decommissioning of the Eurochemic Reprocessing Plant, at 5
6 Based on past experience of decommissioning small reprocessing plants, 9 a possible minimum timeframe for decommissioning the North Korean reprocessing plant could be broken down into the following phases 1) 1-2 years for D&D planning studies; 2) one year for flushing out the pipes and tanks; 3) 1-2 years for decontamination; 4) around 3 years for dismantling the main cells. Based on the decommissioning experience for Eurochemic reprocessing, dismantling one main process cell could take around half a year. Thus dismantling the six main cells at the Yongbyon reprocessing plant would take about three years. 5) several years (around 5-7 years) to process and dispose of various wastes; 6) a few years to restore the site for other uses. Consequently, a complete D&D for the North Korean reprocessing plant would take about 10 to 15 years. However, it should be noted that it should not take such a long time to reach a point of a permanent disablement of the reprocessing plant. For instance, it could take only 5-6 years (i.e. after finishing the first four steps as listed above) to arrive a point where all main process cells are dismantled. In practice, from the perspective of disablement, it may not need to wait for dismantling all the cells. For example, after dismantling the main cell for fuel dissolution and main cell for the first codecontamination, the reprocessing facility would be effectively permanently disabled. In addition, planning studies and rinsing and decontamination processes could be conducted simultaneously. Thus, an effective disablement could be arrived at within three years. To further reduce the timeframe for disablement, another option could be to entomb the main cells after rinsing and decontamination. Thus, it could take only around two years to achieve disablement. However, it would exclude potential reuse of those cells. D&D Costs The cost of decommissioning a reprocessing facility is determined by a number of factors including the size and complexity of reprocessing facility, the number of main process cells, operating history, cleaning and classification levels, labor costs, the amount of waste. Based on the decommissioning experience of Eurochemic reprocessing (see table 2), the two largest cost items, making up for the majority of total costs for a reprocessing facility are dismantling and waste management. For example, based on the cost estimates as shown in table 2, 10 the combined decontamination and dismantling costs for the whole D&D project account for about 75%, and the cost for waste management is around 22%. 9 See, e.g., Bunn and Zhang, Decommissioning North Korea s Nuclear Facilities: Issues, Options, and Costs, Forthcoming. 10 Pierre Saverot, Experiences in Decommissioning PUREX Reprocessing plants and Graphite Rectors, op.cit. 6
7 Table 2: Eurochemic D&D Cost Estimates Activity Cost (million Cost (% of total) Euros, 2004) Decontamination and dismantling Waste Management Site restoration and cleanup Total Some estimates show that manpower costs generally represent a significant share of total costs. An estimate for decommissioning cost of the UK s B205 reprocessing facility yielded the same conclusion. 11 Table 3 lists decommissioning cost estimates for several different reprocessing plants. The decommissioning cost for a small scale reprocessing facility could be as high as several hundred millions of dollars. Regarding the costs of decommissioning for the North Korean reprocessing plant, it would be difficult to estimate these precisely. Roughly speaking, if the decommissioning costs for Eurochemic reprocessing are used as a guide, the decommissioning cost for the North Korean reprocessing plant could amount to several hundred million dollars. However, considering the breakdown of costs, the North Koreanplant is likely to be less costly to decommission than Eurochemic. Based on thedecommissioning experience for Eurochemic reprocessing, the decontamination and dismantling activities make up the largest portion (over 75%) of the total decommissioning cost. In practice, one major factor dictating the dismantling activities is the number of main cells to be dismantled. It usually takes around half a year to dismantle one main cell. If the number of main cells to be dismantled dictate the dismantling cost, then the cost for dismantling the 6 main cells at Yongbyon reprocessing building will be much lower than dismantling the 40 main cells at Eurochemic reprocessing. Moreover, one consideration that may significantly reduce the decommissioning cost is that North Korea will not pursue complete decommissioning to a green field as the Eurochemic reprocessing plant is scheduled to. The setting of clearance levels has a significant effect on the quantity of materials that remain for disposal as radioactive waste and hence on the overall costs of waste management. Given the fact that the reprocessing site has already been used to store various nuclear wastes, it may be so contaminated that it is not worth cleaning. Moreover, no waste storage facilities exist elsewhere. Thus it may be both feasible and cost-effective to reuse the site for waste treatment and storage. For example, after dismantling the cells, they can be used for ILW storage and mid-term storage for conditioning HLW while awaiting final disposal. In practice, the Italian EUREX pilot reprocessing plant of ENEA is being decommissioned and some cells are to be reused for a vitrification plant NEA, Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities: An Analysis of the Variability of Decommissioning Cost Estimates, OECD M.Troiani and P.Risoluti, Direct Dismantling of Reprocessing Plant Cells-the EUREXPlant Experience, WM 03 Conference, February 23-27, 2003, Tucson, AZ. 7
8 Table 3: Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Various Reprocessing Plants 13 Facility Estimated costs Converted cost in M USD (2007) Eurochemic 203 Meuros (2004) 267 (Belgium) AT-1 pilot reprocessing (France) 400 M FF (1990) 101 AMP (France) 450 Meuro (2005) 594 EUREX (Italy) 396 M (2004) 521 Conclusions and Suggestions The best approaches for decommissioning the 5 MWe reactor would be SAFSTOR option. The D&D cost could have a huge range, e.g., from a few tens million to over one billion. However, if North Korean 5 MWe reactor is to apply Handford cocooning experience, the decommissioning cost could be at the very low end of the range. A serious estimate needs detailed engineering studies and further refined during the SAFSTOR. The best approaches for decommissioning the reprocessing would be DECON option. A complete D&D for the North Korean reprocessing plant would take about 10 to 15 years. An effectively permanent disablement could be arrived at within a few years. The D&D cost could be up to a few million USD. 13 See, e.g., Bunn and Zhang, Decommissioning North Korea s Nuclear Facilities: Issues, Options, and Costs. 8
Decommissioning a Magnox Power Station
Slide 1 Decommissioning a Magnox Power Station Neutron Users Club 6 October 2005 H Madog Jones Trawsfynydd Decommissioning Site Slide 2 Trawsfynydd Power Station Role of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
More informationRADIOACTIVE GRAPHITE MANAGEMENT AT UK MAGNOX NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS. G. HOLT British Nuclear Fuels plc, Berkeley, United Kingdom 1.
RADIOACTIVE GRAPHITE MANAGEMENT AT UK MAGNOX NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS G. HOLT British Nuclear Fuels plc, Berkeley, United Kingdom Abstract. The UK nuclear power industry is predominantly based on gas-cooled,
More informationDecommissioning of Nuclear Installations
Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Definition of Decommissioning The administrative and technical actions taken to allow the removal of some or all of the regulatory controls from a nuclear facility
More informationDecommissioning of Nuclear Facilities. The Decommissioning Process. Lesson Objectives. Decommissioning. Decontamination. Decommissioning Objective
Lesson Objectives International Atomic Energy Agency Define specific decommissioning terms of Nuclear Facilities The Process Understand the decommissioning process Review the various decommissioning strategies
More informationNuclear Decommissioning Authority
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Ten Years of the NDA, 2005-2015 Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations: Strategies, Practices and Challenges Moscow, Russian Federation 9-11 November 2015 John Mathieson
More informationJoint ICTP-IAEA School on Nuclear Energy Management. 15 July - 3 August, Lecture Notes. I. Mele IAEA, Vienna, Austria
2473-9 Joint ICTP-IAEA School on Nuclear Energy Management 15 July - 3 August, 2013 Lecture Notes I. Mele IAEA, Vienna, Austria The IAEA Nuclear Energy Management School ICTP, Trieste, 15-2 August 2013
More informationEDF DECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMME - A PREREQUISITE FOR THE ERECTION OF NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FRANCE
EDF DECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMME - A PREREQUISITE FOR THE ERECTION OF NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IN FRANCE J.-J. Grenouillet Electricité de France Dismantling, Waste management & Environment Engineering Center
More informationConstantly Learning from Experience - Nuclear Reactor Decommissioning in the UK
Constantly Learning from Experience - Nuclear Reactor Decommissioning in the UK Dr Adrian Simper, OBE NDA Director of Strategy & Technology NDA 2017 Agenda The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority The Decommissioning
More informationState of the Nuclear Industry Decontamination & Decommissioning Are We Ready. April 25, Presented by: Michael Frediani
State of the Nuclear Industry Decontamination & Decommissioning Are We Ready April 25, 2018 Presented by: Michael Frediani Special Thanks!!! This presentation was developed in collaboration with Sargent
More informationIntroduction. Glossary
Introduction The Government s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and United Kingdom Nirex Limited (Nirex) periodically publish an inventory of radioactive waste in the UK. This
More informationEconomics of Spent Nuclear Fuel Management An International Overview
Economics of Spent Nuclear Fuel Management An International Overview Hans Forsström Senior Adviser, SKB International AB CEG Workshop, Aronsborg, Sweden, 7 October 2011 Spent fuel - a resource or waste?
More informationIntroduction. Status of Worldwide Nuclear Power Plants*
KAIF-JAIF 24 th International Joint Forum Conference Nuclear on Structural Power Plant Mechanics Safety and in Decommissioning Reactor Technology 1 Introduction Status of Worldwide Nuclear Power Plants*
More informationThe UK Nuclear Industry, Past, Present and Future. From decommissioning the original fleet of nuclear power stations, to nuclear new build
1 The UK Nuclear Industry, Past, Present and Future From decommissioning the original fleet of nuclear power stations, to nuclear new build Dr Keith Franklin, First Secretary (Nuclear), British Embassy
More informationDecommissioning of Nuclear Facilities: The Work Ahead and How to Succeed
Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities: The Work Ahead and How to Succeed William D. Magwood, IV Director General Nuclear Energy Agency International Workshop on Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants
More informationRadiation protection during decontamination and decommissioning operations at Marcoule
Radiation protection during decontamination and decommissioning operations at Marcoule Philipp Blaise (1), Jean-Louis Garcia (1), Joël Chardin (2) (1) Commissariat à l Énergie Atomique CEA/Marcoule BP
More informationDECOMMISSIONING STRATEGIES AND PLANS. By: Elna Fourie Necsa South Africa Manager: Decommissioning Services
DECOMMISSIONING STRATEGIES AND PLANS By: Elna Fourie Necsa South Africa Manager: Decommissioning Services 2011 SELECTION OF A DECOMMISSIONING STRATEGY The two most common decommissioning strategies are
More informationAdapting Dismantling and Decommissioning Strategies to a Variety of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities 12237
Adapting Dismantling and Decommissioning Strategies to a Variety of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities 12237 Frédéric CHAMBON, Gilles CLEMENT AREVA ABSTRACT AREVA has accumulated over 20 years of experience
More informationKINECTRICS QUALITY PROGRAM FORM QF R1304 RSP Title: International Benchmarking on Decommissioning Strategies File: K R0
KINECTRICS QUALITY PROGRAM FORM QF-05-10 R1304 RSP-0303 Title: International Benchmarking on A Report Submitted to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) June 30, 2014 Issue R00 Reason for Issue:
More informationNuclear Decommissioning
http://www.theiet.org/cpd Nuclear Decommissioning This Factfile briefly outlines the history of nuclear power in the UK, the strategy adopted for nuclear decommissioning and the practice for safely undertaking
More informationIAEA-TECDOC-1124 XA On-site disposal
IAEA-TECDOC-1124 XA9953315 On-site disposal The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Waste Technology Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse On-site disposal FOREWORD
More informationDECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT IN JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
DECOMMISSIONING PROGRAMS AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT IN JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Mitsugu Tanaka, Mimori Takeo, Takakuni Hirabayashi and Satoshi Yanagihara Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute
More informationDecommissioning and Site Release Problems for Georgian Nuclear Research Reactor IRT-M
Decommissioning and Site Release Problems for Georgian Nuclear Research Reactor IRT-M Giorgi Nabakhtiani Grigol Kiknadze Nuclear and Radiation Safety Service Ministry of Environment Protection and Natural
More informationNuclear power requires relatively large capital investments, long lead times, and a solid supporting infrastructure.
TECHNOLOGY SUMMARY C.1: LIGHT WATER REACTOR (LWR) Source Country for Data: IAEA Date: August, 1994 Technology Data Type: Best Available Practice GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS Sector: Electricity. Applications:
More informationIAEA-TECDOC-1133 The decommissioning of WWER type nuclear power plants
IAEA-TECDOC-1133 The decommissioning of WWER type nuclear power plants Final report of an IAEA Regional Technical Co-operation Project January 2000 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA
More informationRADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES IN OECD/NEA MEMBER COUNTRIES ITALY [2013] NATIONAL NUCLEAR ENERGY CONTEXT
RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES IN OECD/NEA MEMBER COUNTRIES ITALY [2013] NATIONAL NUCLEAR ENERGY CONTEXT Commercial utilization of nuclear power in Italy started in 1962 and by 1981 four nuclear
More informationSan Onofre Unit 1 Decommissioning
San Onofre Unit 1 Decommissioning Eric M. Goldin, Ph.D., CHP Southern California Edison P. O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 USA Introduction Nuclear plant decommissioning presents several challenges
More informationComparison of decommissioning options for the example of 2 research reactors of type TRIGA
Comparison of decommissioning options for the example of 2 research reactors of type TRIGA Dr. Jörg Kaulard *, Barbara Jünger-Gräf ** * Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) mbh ** German
More informationNational Inventory of Radioactive Materials and Waste The Essentials
National Inventory of Radioactive Materials and Waste 2012 The Essentials National Inventory of Radioactive Materials and Waste 2012 ISSUES AND PRINCIPLES OF THE MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS AND
More informationD&D of Nuclear Power Plants - Global Emerging Issues and Strategies
D&D of Nuclear Power Plants - Global Emerging Issues and Strategies Prof. Dr. Bruno Thomauske RWTH Aachen University (Germany) Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Technology Transfer (NET) 1 CONTENT 1.
More informationJOINT CONVENTION ON THE SAFETY OF SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT AND ON THE SAFETY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT
JOINT CONVENTION ON THE SAFETY OF SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT AND ON THE SAFETY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland NATIONAL REPORT PRESENTATION For the Second
More informationThe Decommissioning and Dismantling of Nuclear Facilities
Radioactive Waste Management The Decommissioning and Dismantling of Nuclear Facilities Status, Approaches, Challenges NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION
More informationDESIGNING DECOMMISSIONING INTO NEW REACTOR DESIGNS 1
DESIGNING DECOMMISSIONING INTO NEW REACTOR DESIGNS 1 Dr. J.S. Devgun, Ph.D., CHMM Nuclear Power Technologies Sargent & Lundy LLC 55 E. Monroe St Chicago, IL 60603 U.S.A. ABSTRACT One of the lessons learned
More informationTOPICAL SESSION MANAGEMENT OF DECOMMISSIONING WASTES
TOPICAL SESSION MANAGEMENT OF DECOMMISSIONING WASTES Waste Technology Section WATEC 2004, 18-22 Oct 2004 Presentation Objectives Highlight the interactions between decommissioning and waste management
More informationMonitoring Developments at North Korea s Yongbyon Nuclear Site
INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY IMAGERY BRIEF Monitoring Developments at North Korea s Yongbyon Nuclear Site By David Albright and Serena Kelleher-Vergantini March 4, 2016 The 5 meagawatt-electric
More informationHanford Low Activity Waste Historical Overview. David Swanberg February 2018
Hanford Low Activity Waste Historical Overview David Swanberg February 2018 1 Outline This session will cover: o Hanford Low Activity Waste (LAW) - origin and definition o Seminal decisions and factors
More informationIAEA SUPPORT OF GLOBAL DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES
International Conference ECED 2015 Eastern and Central European Decommissioning, 23-25 June 2015, Trnava, Slovakia IAEA SUPPORT OF GLOBAL DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES Ian Gordon Head of Waste Technology
More informationRadioactive Waste Management
Keynote lecture IRPA 12 Radioactive Waste Management Jean-Christophe NIEL, Director General Nuclear Safety Authority, Paris E-mail: jean-christophe.niel@asn.fr 1 Content Liquid and gaseous discharges treatment
More informationReturn trip to North Korea
Return trip to North Korea Siegfried S. Hecker Center for International Security and Cooperation Dept. of Management Science and Engineering Stanford University Korea Economic Institute Washington, DC
More informationDECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES IN UKRAINE
DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES IN UKRAINE Tatiana Kilochytska State Nuclear Regulatory Committee of Ukraine Annual Forum for Regulators and Operators in the Field of Decommissioning International
More information7 RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE
7 RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE The IAEA defines storage as [5.1]: the holding of spent fuel or of radioactive waste in a facility that provides for its containment, with the intention of retrieval Storage
More informationINFORMATION SHEET. COORDINATED RESEARCH PROJECT No T MANAGEMENT OF SEVERELY DAMAGED SPENT FUEL AND CORIUM
INFORMATION SHEET COORDINATED RESEARCH PROJECT No T130115 ON MANAGEMENT OF SEVERELY DAMAGED SPENT FUEL AND CORIUM 1. Title: Management of Severely Damaged Spent Fuel and Corium New CRP 2. Summary: The
More informationNUCLEAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND REACTORS - Vol. II - Advanced Gas Cooled Reactors - Tim McKeen
ADVANCED GAS COOLED REACTORS Tim McKeen ADI Limited, Fredericton, Canada Keywords: Advanced Gas Cooled Reactors, Reactor Core, Fuel Elements, Control Rods Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Magnox Reactors
More informationDecommissioning (technical knowledge/experience; national strategies / policies; main issues; future trends)
Decommissioning (technical knowledge/experience; national strategies / policies; main issues; future trends) Michele Laraia, IAEA World Nuclear University- Summer Institute 2008 Ottawa, Canada, 18 July
More information- 1 - Ingenieurgesellschaft für wissenschaftlich technischen Umweltschutz
- 1 - Strategies for Radiological Characterisation in Decommissioning S. Thierfeldt, K. Haneke - Brenk Systemplanung GmbH, Aachen OECD/NEA Workshop on Radiological Characterisation for Decommissioning
More informationDECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS
DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS Research Paper 96/83 18 July 1996 With the sale of British Energy plc pending, the decommissioning of the UK's nuclear reactors is a pertinent issue. This paper
More informationNovel treatments to improve radioactive waste disposal : the case of Andra
Novel treatments to improve radioactive waste disposal : the case of Andra IGD-TP Exchange Forum n 6 4/11/2015 Andra s positioning ahead of disposal Andra, French Agency in charge of radioactive waste
More informationNuclear Decommissioning, Waste Management, and Environmental Site Remediation
Nuclear Decommissioning, Waste Management, and Environmental Site Remediation Dr C. R. BAYLISS CEng FIEE & Dr K. F. LANGLEY CChem MRSC ELSEVIER BUTTERWORTH HEINEMANN Amsterdam Boston Heidelberg London
More informationNeil J. Numark N.J. Numark Associates, Inc. Washington, DC. Tatsujiro Suzuki Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA
1993 Neil J. Numark and Tatsujiro Suzuki. All rights reserved. COMPARISON OF RECYCLE AND DISPOSAL OPTIONS FOR FISSILE MATERIALS ARISING FROM DISARMAMENT TREATIES Neil J. Numark N.J. Numark Associates,
More informationThe 2010 UK Radioactive Waste Inventory: A Summary of Information for International Reporting
The 2010 UK Radioactive Waste Inventory: A Summary of Information for International Reporting 1 URN 10D/987 NDA/ST/STY(11)006 February 2011 The 2010 UK Radioactive Waste Inventory A Summary of Information
More informationReprocessing and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management at the Savannah River Site
Reprocessing and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management at the Savannah River Site Some of the terms used in this factsheet are defined in IEER s on-line glossary. Tens of thousands of tons of radioactive material
More informationADVANCED DECOMMISSIONING COSTING CALCULATION TOOLS FOR PILOT VIENNA TRIGA MARK-II RESEARCH REACTOR
ADVANCED DECOMMISSIONING COSTING CALCULATION TOOLS FOR PILOT VIENNA TRIGA MARK-II RESEARCH REACTOR K. KRISTOFOVA, M. HORNACEK, V. SLUGEN Institute of Nuclear and Physical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical
More informationThe relevance for the nuclear industry decommissioning programmes
Control and Management of Inadvertent Radioactive Material in Scrap Metal Tarragona, 23-27 February 2009 The relevance for the nuclear industry decommissioning programmes Patrick J O Sullivan Radiation
More informationIntroduction to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Introduction to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Overview of fuel cycle Mining F R O N T E N D Milling & Extraction Convert to UF6 Enrichment Fuel Fabrication REACTOR Store U Pu LLW ILW HLW REPROCESS BACK END Store
More informationInternational safeguards aspects of spent-fuel storage
: Safeguards & non-proliferation International safeguards aspects of spent-fuel storage Techniques and approaches are evolving to meet future challenges by V. Pushkarjov and E.Tkharev Spent-fuel storage
More informationWM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
A Study on Optimized Management Options for the Wolsong Low- and Intermediate - Level Disposal Center in Korea 13479 JooWan Park, DongSun Kim and DongEun Choi Korea Radioactive Management Corporation,
More informationSafety Requirements for Decommissioning of Research Reactors
for Decommissioning of Research Reactors B. Batandjieva, IAEA Research Reactor Decommissioning Demonstration Project (R2D2P) 26-30 June 2006, Manila, Philippines Contents Background Safety Standards on
More informationPRESENT STATUS OF LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND DECOMMISSIONING PLANNING FOR DNRR. Prepared by NUCLEAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE, VAEC.
TECHNICAL MEETING ON THE RESEARCH REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: CHARACTERIZATION SURVEY PHILIPPINES, 3 7 DECEMBER 2007 PRESENT STATUS OF LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND DECOMMISSIONING
More informationLow Level Waste (LLW) Management: Consolidate R & D on Orphan and Hazardous Wastestreams
Low Level Waste (LLW) Management: Consolidate R & D on Orphan and Hazardous Wastestreams David Loudon, Sellafield Ltd. 20 th November 2009 1 Introduction, Scope, and Assumptions 1.1 Introduction The Low
More informationDECOMMISSIONING OF A UK NUCLEAR POWER STATION IN A NATIONAL PARK - AN OWNERS PERSPECTIVE
DECOMMISSIONING OF A UK NUCLEAR POWER STATION IN A NATIONAL PARK - AN OWNERS PERSPECTIVE ABSTRACT Keith Spooner Decommissioning Site Manager Trawsfynydd Decommissioning Site BNFL 1 Trawsfynydd was one
More informationIPR-R1 TRIGA RESEARCH REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING: PRELIMINARY PLAN
2007 International Nuclear Atlantic Conference - INAC 2007 Santos, SP, Brazil, September 30 to October 5, 2007 ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE ENERGIA NUCLEAR - ABEN ISBN: 978-85-99141-02-1 IPR-R1 TRIGA RESEARCH
More informationPage 1. WM2011 Conference, February 27- March 3, 2011, Phoenix, AZ. A Standardised Listing of Cost Items for Decommissioning Costing 11483
A Standardised Listing of Cost Items for Decommissioning Costing 11483 Patrick O Sullivan 1, Michele Laraia 2, Thomas Kirchner 3, Vladimir Daniska 4, Jan Carlsson 5 1 OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA);
More informationNear-term Options for Treatment and Recyle
Near-term Options for Treatment and Recyle Dr. Alan Hanson AREVA NC Inc. Executive Vice President, Technology and Used-Fuel Management American Nuclear Society Annual Meeting June 26, 2007 Boston, MA GNEP
More informationOperational decommissioning experience in Italy Francesco Troiani, SOGIN
1 European Commission, Joint Research Centre 11-15 th September 2017, JRC Ispra (Italy) 9 th edition of the International Summer School on Nuclear Decommissioning and Waste Management Operational decommissioning
More informationNATIONAL PROGRESS REPORT INDONESIA
NATIONAL PROGRESS REPORT INDONESIA 2015-06-30 0. INTRODUCTION The Research Reactor Decommissioning Demonstration Project (R2D2P) was developed to provide a platform for training and exchange of information,
More informationWM2012 Conference, February 26 March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
ABSTRACT Use of the Waste-Incidental-to-Reprocessing Citation Process at the West Valley Demonstration Project - 12250 Dan Sullivan,* Linda Suttora*, Sonny Goldston**, Robert Petras***, Laurene Rowell,
More informationCurrent Status of Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Safety Regulations
RATIS RAdiation Technology Information System 2017 KARA ISSUE PAPER No.05 www.ratis.or.kr Current Status of Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Safety Regulations Analysis of Trend Radiation Technology
More informationRESEARCH REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING PLAN
RESEARCH REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING PLAN Clédola Cássia O. de Tello Pablo Andrade Grossi Brazil Contents General Aspects Ongoing Activities Decommissioning Plan Conclusion 1 TRIGA IPR-R1 REACTOR Four research
More informationInternational Structure for Decommissioning Costing (ISDC) ISDC Costing Methodology, Principles. CERREX Costing Software for Research Reactors
INTERNATIONAL DECOMMISSIONING NETWORK (IDN) 5 TH MEETING International Structure for Decommissioning Costing (ISDC) ISDC Costing Methodology, Principles CERREX Costing Software for Research Reactors Vladimír
More informationTHE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE
THE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE Uranium is a slightly radioactive metal that is found throughout the earth s crust It is about 500 times more abundant than gold and about as common as tin Natural uranium is a mixture
More informationIAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment. Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities
DS447 Date: 20 February 2015 IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment STATUS: SPESS STEP 12 For submission to CSS Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Fuel Cycle
More informationDecommissioning the Philippine Research Reactor (Under R2D2P): Updates and Challenges
Decommissioning the Philippine Research Reactor (Under R2D2P): Updates and Challenges C.C. Bernido,, F.L. Santos, L.S. Leopando Philippine Nuclear Research Institute Philippine Research Reactor (PRR-1)
More informationPart 2. EVPP 111 Lecture Dr. Largen
1 Energy: Nuclear Energy Part 2 EVPP 111 Lecture Dr. Largen 2 Outline 3 Outline 4 Energy: Nuclear Energy series of actions/activities involved in using nuclear fuels to generate energy steps mining ore
More informationInternational Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Activities on Spent fuel Management; Keeping the Recycle Option Open
International Atomic Energy Agency () Activities on Spent fuel Management; Keeping the Recycle Option Open Z. Lovasic WM 09 Panel on SF Recycle International Atomic Energy Agency Current world scene in
More informationSafety Research for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste Generated by Decommissioning of of Nuclear Power Facilities
Safety Research for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste Generated by Decommissioning of of Nuclear Power Facilities Kenkichi ISHIGURE Japan Radioisotope Association 1 Decommissioning of nuclear power facilities
More informationDecommissioning of Dairyland Power s Lacrosse Boiling Water Reactor
Decommissioning of Dairyland Power s Lacrosse Boiling Water Reactor Dairyland Power Cooperative The plant achieved initial criticality in July, 1967. Full power was reached in August, 1969 and was declared
More informationSpanish Management Issues in Radioactive and Nuclear Waste Materials Dr. Amparo González Espartero
Spanish Management Issues in Radioactive and Nuclear Waste Materials Dr. Amparo González Espartero Senior Researcher Head of CIEMAT Quality Management CYTED- Energy Area Technical Secretary of Spanish
More informationWorking Party on Decommissioning and Dismantling (WPDD)
Unclassified NEA/RWM/WPDD(2003)6 NEA/RWM/WPDD(2003)6 Unclassified Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 07-Nov-2003 English
More informationDecommissioning of Nuclear Facilities - Regulatory Requirements -
Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities - Regulatory Requirements - Ernst Warnecke; NSRW R²D²Project: Basics of Decommissioning of Research Reactors / Manila; 16-20 October 2006 1 International Atomic Energy
More informationToru OGAWA. Overview of Radioactive Waste Management in Japan And R&D Activities for Fukushima Daiichi
The 1 st International Forum on the Decommissioning of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station -Commemorating 5 years since the Great East Japan Earthquake- Apr.10-11, 2016 Overview of Radioactive
More informationIAEA-TECDOC-272 IAEA PROVISIONAL CODE OF PRACTICE ON
IAEA-TECDOC-272 IAEA PROVISIONAL CODE OF PRACTICE ON MANAGEMENT IAEA PROVISIONAL CODE OF PRACTICE ON MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE FROM NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS IAEA, VIENNA, 1982 IAEA-TECDOC-272 Printed
More informationRadioactive Wastes in the UK: A Summary of the 2016 Inventory
Radioactive Wastes in the UK: A Summary of the 2016 Inventory 1 Preface The 2016 United Kingdom Radioactive Waste & Materials Inventory (the 2016 Inventory) provides detailed information on radioactive
More informationThe BN-350 sodium-cooled fast reactor was an industrial-scale
BN-350 reactor building; photo was taken during United Kingdom-Kazakhstan meeting, October 2010. The Benefits of International Cooperation on Decommissioning U.S. and U.K. Contributions to the Decommissioning
More informationMagnox Limited Integrated Decommissioning and Waste Management Strategy
Magnox Limited Integrated Decommissioning and Waste Management Strategy May 2016 2 Executive Summary Under contract with the NDA, Magnox is responsible for delivering the clean-up and restoration of the
More informationICEM DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENVI SIMULATOR TO ESTIMATE KOREAN SNF FLOW AND ITS COST
Proceedings of the 12 th International Conference on Environmental Remediation And Radioactive Waste Management ICEM 2009 October 11-15, 2009, Liverpool, England, UK ICEM 2009 16060 DEVELOPMENT OF THE
More informationEconomics of Plutonium Recycle
Economics of Plutonium Recycle Thomas B. Cochran, Ph.D. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. Policy Review Panel on Nuclear Fuel Recycling Global Energy and Environment Initiative (GEEI) Johns Hopkins
More informationBenefits from R&D for D&D Projects 15089
Benefits from R&D for D&D Projects 15089 Christine GEORGES *, Charly MAHE, Lionel BOUCHER, Frédéric CHARTON, Yves SOULABAILLE * CEA - French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (christine.georges@cea.fr)
More informationA Global Cleanout of Nuclear-weapon Materials
A Global Cleanout of Nuclear-weapon Materials Frank von Hippel Professor of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University and Co-chair, International Panel on Fissile Materials Science and Security
More informationRole of Slovakia within the IAEA Decommissioning Related Activities 9031
Role of Slovakia within the IAEA Decommissioning Related Activities 9031 Vladimir Michal, Marian Stubna VUJE, Inc. Okruzna 5, 918 64 Trnava, Slovak Republic ABSTRACT Slovakia has a long-term experience
More informationPreparation for Future Defuelling and Decommissioning Works on EDF Energy s UK Fleet of Advanced Gas Cooled Reactors
PREDEC 2016: February 16-18, Lyon, France Preparation for Future Defuelling and Decommissioning Works on EDF Energy s UK Fleet of Advanced Gas Cooled Reactors John BRYERS, Simon ASHMEAD EDF Energy Generation
More informationIWS Action Plan. April 2014
IWS Action Plan April Magnox Integrated Decommissioning and Waste Management Strategy Action Plan Owner: Peter Roach Strategic Programmes Signature: Date: 23 rd April Published in the United Kingdom by
More informationGeneric Aspects for Dismantling Preparation of INPP Reactor Facilities. Aleksej Merežnikov, Ignalina NPP, July 2014
Generic Aspects for Dismantling Preparation of INPP Reactor Facilities Aleksej Merežnikov, Ignalina NPP, July 2014 Agenda INTRODUCTION REGULATORY FRAMEWORK RBMK-1500 FEATURES GENERAL APROACH STATUS AND
More informationDepartment of Energy Spent Nuclear Fuel - Update. Outline
Department of Energy Spent Nuclear Fuel - Update Edgard Espinosa Office of Environmental Management Briefing to the Institute for Nuclear Materials Management January 13, 2015 www.energy.gov/em 1 Outline
More informationThe 20 th N-20 Joint Statement
November 13 th, 2013 The 20 th N-20 Joint Statement The group N-20, which consists of nuclear industrial and research experts from Japan and France, held its 20 th meeting in Tokyo, Japan, from November
More informationX. Global stocks and production of fissile materials, 2011
WORLD NUCLEAR FORCES 345 X. Global stocks and production of fissile materials, 2011 ALEXANDER GLASER AND ZIA MIAN INTERNATIONAL PANEL ON FISSILE MATERIALS Materials that can sustain an explosive fission
More informationInternational Conference on the Management of Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors - an Integrated Approach to the Back-End of the Fuel Cycle
International Conference on the Management of Spent Fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors - an Integrated Approach to the Back-End of the Fuel Cycle Retrieval of Damaged Fuel from Wet and Dry Storage using
More informationPRR-1 Decommissioning: Implementing Dismantling and Decontamination. R2D2 Project Meeting, Manila, Philippines September
PRR-1 Decommissioning: Implementing Dismantling and Decontamination R2D2 Project Meeting, Manila, Philippines 15-19 September 2008 1 Presented by Leonardo S. Leopando Philippine Nuclear Research Institute
More informationGESTION DES DECHETS RADIOACTIFS AUX USA
GESTION DES DECHETS RADIOACTIFS AUX USA Stéphane GIN CEA Marcoule DTCD-SECM Journées thématiques de la SFRP 1er et 2 octobre 2013 PAGE 1 Where do the wastes come from? Commercial wastes: few amount arisen
More informationDECOMMISSIONING EXPERIENCE IN SPAIN. Manuel Rodríguez Silva
DECOMMISSIONING EXPERIENCE IN SPAIN Manuel Rodríguez Silva ISPRA, July 2011 Strategy: The Spanish Scenario Decommissioning responsibility Enresa RW Management Plan Financial aspects Enresa s Fund Final
More informationIntroduction: Recommendation: This report is for noting. Steering Group, Item 7, Update on NDA Strategy and Operations, 7 June
Meeting: NuLeAF Steering Group, 7 June 2016 Agenda Item: 7 Subject: Update on developments in NDA strategy and operations Author: Philip Matthews Purpose: To update on developments in NDA Strategy and
More informationSpent Nuclear Fuel, Low Level Radioactive Waste and Decommissioning
Spent Nuclear Fuel, Low Level Radioactive Waste and Decommissioning Vermont Legislature January 29, 2009 - Revised Montpelier, Vermont Presented by Bruce Lacy 1 Topics Spent Nuclear Fuel Low Level Radioactive
More information