Tracking Results for Adaptation : The Experience of the Adaptation Fund Metrics of Adaptation Conference 27 September 2016, Skhirat, Morocco

Transcription

1 Tracking Results for Adaptation : The Experience of the Adaptation Fund Metrics of Adaptation Conference 27 September 2016, Skhirat, Morocco Daouda Ndiaye AFB secretariat

2 The Adaptation Fund was established under the Kyoto Protocol of the UNFCCC Goal: Increase resilience through concrete adaptation projects & programmes Focus on most vulnerable countries and communities Innovative Features: Governed by majority of developing countries Levy on Clean Development Mechanism proceeds & other sources of funding Direct access alongside conventional access through international orgs

3 AF Results Framework structure

4 At Fund level - AF s goal and expected impact Goal: Assist developing country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting the costs of concrete adaptation projects and programmes, in order to implement climate resilient measures. Impacts : Increased resiliency at the community, national, and regional levels to climate variability and change; Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change induced stress The Fund-level framework includes seven key outcomes and associated outputs to facilitate aggregation and present Fund level results that contribute to the overall goal and objectives of the Fund available online.

5 The Fund s RBM approach The RBM approach operates at three main levels : Guidance from CMP Portfolio (fund-level) Projects/programmes-level Project/programme-level monitoring: carried out by the NIEs, MIEs, RIEs Fund-level monitoring: carried out by the secretariat under the direction of the Board Actions at these levels will be discussed throughout the following slides

6 Project level - AF Results Management Project level objectives: should align with those outlined for the Fund. All projects will include a concrete and fully budgeted M&E plan to be included in the final project document, submitted for approval. It is important that all plans include a description of organizational arrangements and a specific budget for monitoring, reporting, data management, lessons learned, and evaluation. Projects select a set of indicators that align with the indicators and objectives of the Fund. Project results frameworks include only those core Fund-level indicators that appropriately reflect project objectives. In addition, project specific indicators would also be selected to reflect country specific objectives and reporting requirements. The Board would not aggregate these indicators, but rather track progress on achieving the project targets. Each project develops its own set of output and outcome indicators that link directly to the Fund. Project level targets should also be included in the project log frame.

7 - 7 outcomes - 7 outputs - Covering relevant adaptation areas

8 An example

9 Project level - Alignement of projects with AF results framework Project Objective(s) Project Objective Indicator(s) Fund Outcome Fund Outcome Indicator Grant Amount (USD) Project Outcome(s) Project Outcome Indicator(s) Fund Output Fund Output Indicator Grant Amount (USD)

10 At Fund level - AF 5 core indicators Impact: Increased adaptive capacity of communities to respond to the impacts of climate change 1. Number of beneficiaries (direct & indirect) 2. Number of early warning systems developed 3. Assets produced, developed, improved, or strengthened 4. Increased income, or avoided decrease in income Impact: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change induced stress 5. Natural habitats protected or rehabilitated

11 How are AF core indicators tracked? All projects will be required to provide data on the first indicator ( Number of beneficiaries ) The other 4 should be provided only if they apply to the project itself Core indicators requested 3 times 1. At project design (fully developed proposal) 2. After 1 st year of implementation with PPR (baseline) 3. At project completion

12 12 PRELIMINARY AGGREGATIONS OF TARGETS Impact 1: Reduction in vulnerability of communities and increased adaptive capacity of communities to respond to the impacts of climate change PRELIMINARY INDICATORS TARGET IN DOCUMENTS PROJECT COMMENTS No. of Direct Beneficiaries 3.57 million NOT ALL PROJECTS HAVE REPORTED ON DIRECT BENEFICIARIES AND SOME REPORT AS NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS. No. Early Warning Systems 99 Includes projects targeting several small scale EWS at the village level as well as those targeting one large regional system Impact 2: Strengthened policies that integrate climate resilience strategies into local and national plans PRELIMINARY INDICATORS TARGET IN DOCUMENTS PROJECT COMMENTS No. of policies introduced or 54 Includes any policy whether at adjusted to address climate the local, regional or national change risks level Impact 3: Increased ecosystem resilience in response to climate change induced stresses PRELIMINARY INDICATORS TARGET IN DOCUMENTS PROJECT COMMENTS ha of natural habitats protected or rehabilitated m of coastline protected 119,845 HA 121,025 M

13 Building a bridge between results at projects and Fund s level results tracker

14 Overview of latest thinking & Approaches Sensitivity Sensitivity or susceptibility Exposure to harm Lack of capacity Adaptive to cope Capacity and adapt Vulnerability

15 Adaptation Reasoning Approaching the Analysis Portfolio level understanding of climate change adaptation reasoning adopted by projects/programmes Climate related drivers Adaptation Needs Key risks Barriers preventing adaptation Adaptation Responses Concrete outputs

16 Adaptation needs Barriers Institutional Social Capacity and Resource - Information Capacity and Resource - Technology Capacity and Resource - Finance Capacity and Resource - Human Biophysical 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l

17 Adaptation Responses all projects Social - educational Social - informational Engineering and built environment Structural/Physica Technological Ecosystem-based Institutional - government l policies and programmes Services Structural/Physical - technological Structural/Physical - engineered and Educational built environment Social Informational Structural/Physical - ecosystem-based Behavioral Economic Institutional - laws and regulations Laws and regulations Government policies and programs Institutional - economic Institutional Structural/Physical - services Social - behavioural 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l 1900n1900r00l

18 THANK YOU!!