Solid/Liquid Separation of Hog Manure. Utilizing a Settling Tank
|
|
- Andra Simmons
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Solid/Liquid Separation of Hog Manure Utilizing a Settling Tank Presented To Manitoba Rural Adaptation Council Inc. By Larry Slevinsky, PAg Gary Plohman, PEng Dr. Geza Racz, PhD February 2009.
2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors express their gratitude to the Manitoba Rural Adaptation Council Inc. (MRAC) for the funding provided for the study. We are grateful to Puratone Corporation, particularly Roland Harder and Dean Gurney for their co-operation and assistance in construction of the settling tank, composting of the manure solids, and use of the facilities at the grower\finisher barn.. 2
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS.. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 INTRODUCTION. 6 PROJECT OBJECTIVE 8 METHODOLOGY 9 Barn Location and Description 9 Description of Settling Tank 9 Pig Size, Feed and Manure Types...9 Experimental Procedures.10 Manure Analyses.11 Composting of Manure Solids..12 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 13 Temperature 13 Potassium and NH 4 -N Contents.13 Settling of Manure Constituents 14 (A) Total Phosphorus (P)...14 (B) N to P Ratios Trial 1 to (C) Percent Solids...16 Compost...17 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.19 LITERATURE CITED.21 APPENDIX A - TABLES OF MANURE ANALYSES
4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Some livestock producers, particularly in South Eastern Manitoba, do not have a large enough land base to utilize the P in manures if current regulations for soil P levels and P loadings are to be met. Removal of some or all of the P from the manure prior to land application is one means of reducing loadings of P to soils treated with manures. Separation of the P along with some manure solids from the liquid and soluble constituents would provide two types of manure. One manure fraction, the liquid fraction, would be low in P and could be used as a nitrogen fertilizer without elevating P levels in soils. The second fraction, the solids containing most of the P from the manure, could be efficiently used elsewhere as a P fertilizer. A study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a settling tank (or gravity) in reducing phosphorus levels in manure. The settling tank was filled with hog manure and the rate of settling of solids and P determined. The manure solids which accumulated at the bottom of the tank were removed, mixed with a bulking agent and composted. Liquid hog manure was pumped into a settling tank (40ft x8 ft x4 ft in depth) and the rate of settling of P and solids investigated. Both P and solids settled out from liquid hog manure quite rapidly and completely when % solids in the manure was about 5.0% or less. Removal of P was about 75% whereas removal of solids was about 50 to 70% in the top 3 feet of manure within 24 hours. The N to P ratio of manures, initially about 5 to 6 to 1, was increased about 15 to 1 in about 48 hr and to 30 to 1 at termination of the trials. The rates of settling were rapid enough to warrant more study and development of settling tanks or similar systems to remove P and/or solids from liquid manures. The settling of both P and solids was slow in a trial in which the manure contained a high percent of solids (6.6%). Both the rate of settling and completeness of separation were poor. Studies are warranted to elucidate the reason(s) for the lack of separation in these instances. The handling and use of the manure solids requires further study. The volume of manure solids was about 15% of the total manure volume when both the solids and P 4
5 settled out reasonably well. In this study the manure solids were composted. The study contained herein showed this to be feasible. However, in some instances this may not be possible (economic and/ or environmentally), and thus other uses for the solids needs to be investigated. Both the systems for handling of the manure solids as well end uses (markets) for the manure solids have to be studied. In the studies contained herein the settling of phosphorus and solids was studied in a batch system, (ie) the settling tank was filled with manure and the settling of phosphorus and solids observed without any inflow or out flow of manure. Adoption and use of a settling system by producers would be much greater if the system could be operated as a flow through or continuous flow system even particularly if it operated satisfactorily for short periods of three to six months. The system would have to remove at least 50 % of the phosphorus from the liquid manure. Thus, it is recommended that the settling efficacy of systems, such as used in this study, be studied as a continuous flow system. A study of the use of the settling tank used in this study as a flow through system has been completed. A report will be available in May Results obtained indicate that the settling tank operated satisfactorily as a flow through system for about one month with the addition of about 1000 imperial gallons per day. 5
6 INTRODUCTION Manure applications or loadings have generally been based on nitrogen (N) requirements of crops. This results in a build up of soluble and total phosphorus (P) in soils since more P is usually applied then that used by crops. A build up of soluble P to high levels posses a risk of transfer of P from soil to surface and / or ground waters causing deleterious effects on water quality and restrictions to its use. The Province of Manitoba enacted regulations with respect to P levels in soils and loadings of P. Some producers (particularly in South Eastern Manitoba) do not have sufficient land to utilize the P produced in manures if regulations are to be met and hence producers need methods of reducing P in manures and loadings to soils. Removal of some or all the P from the manure prior to land application is one means of reducing P loadings to a limited land base. Separation of the P along with some manure solids from the liquid and soluble constituents would provide two types of manure. One manure fraction, the liquid fraction, would be low in P and could be used as a nitrogen fertilizer without elevating P levels in soils. The second fraction, the solids containing most of the P from the manure, could be efficiently used elsewhere as a P fertilizer (e.g. on P deficient soils prior to seeding to alfalfa or composted for other uses). A secondary issue resulting from the application of manures to land is the variability of nutrient application and resulting variability in soil nutrient levels and variations in crop growth. At present, the majority of hog producers in Manitoba use two-cell lagoons for storage of manure prior to land application. During manure removal, the manure in the first cell is mixed and a portion applied to land. Liquids from the second cell are then mixed with the manure in the first cell and applied to land. High solids and correspondingly high phosphorus content usually characterizes the manure contained in the first cell whereas the manure in the second cell is low in solids and P. Even with rigorous and continuous mixing, the manure withdrawn from the storages tends to vary in both solids and nutrient composition during emptying of the storage (Dick et al., 2003). In studies conducted by Slevinsky et al. (2001, 2002), nutrients in manure treated soils varied much more spatially than in soils treated with synthetic fertilizers. 6
7 There is limited information on gravity solid/liquid separation of hog manure and the subsequent handling of the two manure streams. Thus, a study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a settling tank (or gravity) in reducing phosphorus levels in manure. The settling tank was filled with hog manure and the rate of settling of solids and P determined. The manure solids, which accumulated at the bottom of the tank were removed, mixed with a bulking agent and composted.. 7
8 PROJECT OBJECTIVE The objective of this investigation was: To investigate the potential for removal of P from hog manure by the use of a gravity settling tank. Liquid hog manure was pumped into a tank and the rate of settling of P and solids determined. 8
9 METHODOLOGY BARN LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The study was conducted at the Puratone Corporation grower\finisher hog barn located on the N W ¼ E (Figure 1). The barn has a capacity of 6,800 pigs (Figure 2). Manure from the barn is initially stored in the barn, drained to a concrete pump out pit adjacent to the barn and then pumped to two earthen manure storage cells. DESCRIPTION OF SETTLING TANK Puratone staff in Niverville, Manitoba, constructed the settling tank. The tank was constructed using 18-gauge steel and was 40 ft long, 8 ft wide and 4 ft deep (Figure 3). The tank had a sampling compartment (4x8 ft) at one end of the tank to house sampling ports and to provide a means of emptying the tank at termination of each trial. Sampling ports consisted of a valve attached to a plastic tube that extended 4 ft into the tank to ensure that samples were representative of the manure in the tank (Figure 4). Valves were installed at sampling depths of 41.5, 37.5, 33.0, 29.0, 24.5, 20.0, 18.5, 8.5 and 3.0 inches from the bottom of the tank (Figure 5). The tank had no rigid cover, but was covered with a plastic tarpaulin to prevent rain water from entry and to reduce odors. PIG SIZE, FEED AND MANURE TYPES The hogs were about 17 to 18 weeks old at the start of trial 1 and weighed about 150 lb. The hogs were about 21 to 22 weeks old and weighed about 175 lb for trial 2 and were about 24 to 25 weeks old and weighed about 190 lb for trial 3. Phytase was used in all rations that consisted of corn, wheat, barley soybean meal, canola meal, corn distillers grains and wheat middling. Proportion of grains in the ration 9
10 Figure 1. Barn Location
11 Figure 2. Grower/Finisher Barn
12 Figure 3. View of Exterior of Settling Tank
13 Figure 4. Location of Sampling Tubes in the Settling Tank
14 Figure 5. Sampling Compartment and Sampling Valves
15 was varied with age of hog. Total P in the feed ranged from 0.50 % at hog size of 60 lb to 0.47 % at hog size of 190 lb. The manure used in the studies was pumped from the pump - out into the settling tank was from the upper portion of the manure collection pit for trial 1and trial 3 and from the bottom of the pit for trial 2. Nutrient contents and % solids were higher in the manure used for trial 2 than that of the manures used in trials 1 and 3. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES In general, settling of solids and liquids was determined by filling the tank with liquid manure and measuring the manure constituents (e.g. solids and phosphorus) at various depths in the tank at various times after filling of the tank. Three trials were conducted. Trial 1 Approximately 1150 cubic feet (7120 imperial gallons) of liquid hog manure was pumped from the pump - out pit into the settling tank. Samples of manure were taken at 0 hours (tank filling) and at 5.5, 24, 53, 74, 169, 337, 529, 672, and 744 hours after filling at depths of 8.5, 18.5, 29.0 and 41.5 inches from the bottom of the tank. At 672 hours, samples were also taken at 37.5, 33.0, 24.5 and 20.0 inches. A sample of the manure at the surface in the tank and a sample of manure solids at the bottom of the tank were also taken at 672 hours. A sample of the manure solids at the bottom of the settling tank was also taken at 744 hours. Trial 1 was initiated on August 11, 2008 and terminated on September 11, Sampling protocols were as follows: About one-half liter of manure was purged from the sampling port and then a 1-liter sample was taken for analysis. The temperature of the manure was measured and samples stored in a cooler during transport to the laboratory. Samples were delivered to ALS Laboratory Group (Winnipeg, MB.) as soon as feasible after sampling. Samples were delivered to the laboratory within hours after sampling in all instances. 10
16 Trial 2 Trial 2 was initiated on September16, 2008 and terminated on September 29, Procedures for tank filling, sampling and sample handling were as described above. Sampling times were altered since data from trial 1 indicated that manure constituents were settling much more rapidly than anticipated. Manure samples were taken at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 72, 168, and 336 hours after filling of the tank. Depths sampled were as noted for trial 1, except for samples taken at 48 hours when a sample was taken at a depth of 14 in since the sampling port at 8.5 in was plugged with manure solids. At 168 hours, in addition to the regular sampling depths, samples of manure at 37.5, 33.0, 24.5 and 20.0 inches from the bottom of the tank were taken. A sample of manure from the surface of the manure in the tank was also obtained. Two composite samples of manure were obtained during filling of the tank. Samples of manure solids were obtained at 72 and 168 hours at the 8.5 inch depth. Trial 3 Trial 3 started on September 30, 2008 and ended on October 14, Procedures were as outlined for the trials above. Samples were taken at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72, 192, and 336 hours after tank filling at depths of 8.5, 18.5, 29, and 41.5 in. MANURE ANALYSES All manure samples were analyzed for total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), ammonia nitrogen (NH 4 N), potassium (K), % solids and moisture content. In addition to the above parameters all samples of manure solids were analyzed for carbon (C) content. 11
17 COMPOSTING OF MANURE SOLIDS The liquid portion of manure in the tank was decanted after each trial by opening the sampling port valves in sequence from the top to the bottom of the tank. Each port was allowed to drain prior to opening of a lower valve. The depth of manure solids in the tank after trial 1 and 2 were measured. Depths of manure solids for trials 1 and 2 were about 7 and 11 in, respectively. The manure solids were mixed with wood chips as a bulking agent in the tank (Figure 6). The manure solids from trial 1 (168 cu ft) was mixed with about 830 lb (180 cu ft) of wood chips resulting in a ratio of about 1:1.1 manure to wood chips ratio. The manure solids from trial 2 (264 cu ft) was mixed with about 920 lb (200 cu ft) of wood chips. The manure-wood chip mixture was then placed in a shelter (10 x10 ft) (Figure 7). Manure solids from trials 1 and 2 were placed into a covered compost bin on September 11and September 30, respectively and moisture content and temperature recorded. The compost from trial 1 was sampled on September 11, 16, and 30, The compost from trial 2 was sampled on September 30 and October 14, Samples were analyzed for total P, total N, NH 4 -N, potassium, % moisture and % solids. The carbon content of the composts and the wood chips were also determined. 12
18 Figure 6. Addition of Wood Chips to Manure Solids in the Settling Tank
19 Figure 7. Manure Solids/Wood Chip Compost in Storage
20 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION TEMPERATURE The temperature of the manure samples from trials 1 and 2 varied from about 22 to14 C with the higher temperatures occurring at the start of the trial and the lower temperatures occurring at the end of the trial (Appendix A). The manure temperatures were about 18 C at the start and about 4 to 5 C at the termination of trial 3.Thus, the manures cooled considerably during each trial. POTASSIUM AND NH 4 -N CONTENTS The potassium and NH 4 -N contents of the manure remained relatively constant with time and depth (Appendix A). This was expected since these nutrients are highly water soluble and usually are distributed rather uniformly in both liquid and solid phases of manures. Total N also remained relatively constant with depth except for the depths at which manure solids accumulated. Total N in the manure solids was much higher than in the liquid portion due to the accumulation of organic nitrogen (solids). The data show that if the phosphorus settles in the tank, the decanted liquid would make an excellent nitrogen and potassium fertilizer of uniform composition and low in phosphorus. The potassium contents of the decanted liquids were the same as for whole manures (solids and liquids). The nutrient content of the manure in trial 2 was higher than that of manures used in trials 1 and 3. The % solids of manures in trial 2 were about two times that of manures used in trial 1 (6.6 versus 3.5%). 13
21 SETTLING OF MANURE CONSTITUENTS For the purposes of clarity the data for each trial and constituent is presented in two figures. The first figure shows data for the 0 to 169 hour sampling period whereas the second figure shows the data for the entire sampling period. (A) Total Phosphorus (P) Trial 1 Concentration of P declined rapidly with time except for the 8.5 inch depth (Figures 8a and b). P was depleted to low levels in the top two feet of manure in about 24 hours and was depleted to low levels to about 3 feet in 50 hours. P continued to slowly settle out of the manure during the first few hundred hours, but very large amounts of P settled out of the liquids during 0 to 24 or 0 to 48 hours. It is interesting to note that the P concentration at 169 hrs and 337 hrs declined to values of 2 to 3 and 1 to 2 lb/1000 gal and remained low thereafter. The C/Co values (measured concentration of P/ original concentration) for most sampling depths were about 0.25 after 24 hours indicating that P levels decreased to about 25% of original values (Table 1). C/Co values declined to 0.13 for all depths after 600 hours indicating that gravity separation of P from the manure can be very effective in removal of P. The settling of a large portion (~85% reduction in concentration) of P indicates that a large portion of the P in the liquid manure is present as a solid, most likely a precipitate with calcium and /or magnesium. C/Co values greater than 1.0 were encountered occasionally at manure depths near the bottom of the tank. This is to be expected and is a result of the settling out of P from the manure and accumulation at the bottom of the tank. About 1150 cubic feet of liquid manure was added to the tank for trial 1. After the tank was drained approximately 168 cubic feet of manure solids remained in the tank. Thus, the total volume of manure solids high in P that would need to be composted or transported off farm would be about 15% of that without separation. 14
22 Figure 8a. Total P Concentration at Various Depths With Time - Trial 1 (0 to 200 hr) Total P (lb/1000 Imp gal) Time (hrs) 8.5" from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom
23 Figure 8b. Total P Concentration at Various Depths With Time - Trial 1 (0 to 800 hr) Total P (lb/1000 Imp gal) Time (hr) 8.5"from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom
24 Table 1. C/Co Values for Total P - Trial 1 Sampling Time (hr) Depth (in. from bottom) < Table 2. C/Co Values for Total P - Trial 2 Sampling Time (hr) Depth (in. from bottom) _ Table 3. C/Co Values for Total P - Trial 3 Sampling Time (hr) Depth (in. from bottom)
25 Trial 2 In trial 2, the depletion of P from the top few feet of manure was slow and relatively incomplete (Figures 9a and 9b)). Concentrations of P in the upper portion of the manure were still about 7 to11 lb/1000 gal and C/Co values varied from about 0.6 to0.9 even after 168 hours (Table 2). The results for trial 2 are very much in contrast to the results obtained in trial 1 in which the P settled out relatively rapidly and more completely. The reason(s) for the different behavior in rate of settling of P between the two trials is unknown at present. A major difference in manures used for the two separate trials was the solids content. The solids content of the manure in trial 1 was about 3.5% whereas the solids content of the manure used in trial 2 was 6.6 %. Worley and Das (2000) and Funk (2003) also observed that settling of P in liquid manures was impeded when % solids were high. The effects of solids on rate and amount of P precipitation and flocculation (settling) of P is unknown at present, but elucidation of the reactions responsible would be of great benefit in assessing the merits of using settling tanks (or gravity) for separation of P from liquid manures. About 1150 cubic feet of liquid manure was required to fill the settling tank for trial 2.The amount of manure solids after the liquid was decanted was 264 cubic feet resulting in a liquid to manure solids ratio of 4.36 to 1. Trial 3 The results obtained in trial 3 were very similar to the results obtained in trial 1 (Figures 10a and 10b). C/Co values of 0.25 were obtained in the top 3 feet on manure in 48 hours and C/Co values declined to 0.13 to 0.25 for all depths sampled at 336 hours. P concentration declined to 2 to 3 and 1 to 2 lb/1000 gal at 192 and 336 hours, respectively. The P concentration at 0 hours was 8 lb/1000 Imp gal. The removal (settling) of P was approximately 75%. The settling tank was not drained after trial 3 in order to accommodate other studies. 15
26 Total P (lb/1000 Imp gal) Figure 9a. Total P Concentration at Various Depths With Time - Trial 2 (0 to 200 hr) Time (hrs) 8.5" from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom
27 Figure 9b. Total P Concentration at Various Depths With Time - Trial 2 (0 to 400 hr) Total P (lb/1000 Imp gal) " from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom Time (hrs)
28 18 Figure 10a. Total P Concentration at Various Depths With Time - Trial 3 (0 to 200 hr) Total P (lb/1000 Imp gal) " from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom Time (hr)
29 Total P (lb/1000 Imp gal) Figure 10b. Total P Concentration at Various Depths With Time - Trial 3 (0 to 400 hr) Time (hr) 8.5" from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom
30 (B) N to P Ratios Trials 1 to 3 The N to P ratio of manures in the top layers of the settling tank changed very markedly during settling of the manure constituents. The N to P ratio of the manures placed into the settling tank varied from about 5 to 1 to 6 to 1 (values calculated from values in Appendix A). In trial 1 and 3, trials in which the manure constituents settled out quite rapidly and completely, the N to P ratios in the upper layers of manures increased to values of about 15 to 1 in 48 hr and to values of about 30 to 1 at termination of the trials. In trial 2, N to P ratios increased to about 7:10:1 after at about 48 hours and remained at these values until termination of the trial. Applying manures with N to P ratios such as those encountered above in the upper layers of manure will not result In high levels of soil phosphorus even when the manures are applied based on nitrogen requirements of crops. (C) Percent Solids Trial 1 Percent solids was 3.5% in the manure when placed into the settling tank. Percent solids decreased rapidly in the top 3 feet of manure to about 2.0 % in 24 to 48 hours (Figures11a and 11b). Percent solids in the liquids continued to slowly decline after 48 hours to about 1.5 to 1.6% after several hundred hours. Percent solids in the manure at the bottom of the tank increased as expected. The C/Co values for total solids were higher than the C/Co values for P for the top layers of manure at all sampling times (Table 4). The lowest value for C/Co for solids was 0.43 whereas the lowest value of C/Co for P was The settling of solids other than P was not as rapid and not as great as for P alone. Approximately 50 percent of the solids settled out of the top layers within 24 hr and then remained relatively constant 16
31 Figure 11a. % Solids at Various Depths With Time - Trial 1 (0 to 200 hr) % Solids " from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom Time (hrs)
32 Figure 11b. % Solids at Various Depths With Time - Trial 1 (0 to 800 hr) % Solids " from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom Time (hr)
33 Table 4. C/Co Values for % Solids - Trial 1 Sampling Time (hr) Depth (in. from bottom) Table 5. C/Co Values for % Solids Trial 2 Sampling Time (hr) Depth (in. from bottom) _ Table 6. C/Co Values for % Solids - Trial 3 Sampling Time (hr) Depth (in. from bottom)
34 with time. About 43 percent of the solids were in the liquid portion of the manure even at 672 hr. Trial 2 Percent solids in the top layers of manure (~top 3 feet) declined to about 5.0% from 6.6% in 48 hours, but then increased to about 6.0% at 168 and 336 hours (Figures 12a and b). C/Co values at 336 hours (termination of the trial) were about 0.9 indicating that 90% of solids remained in the liquid phase of the manure in this study (Table 5). The lack of settling of solids was somewhat unexpected but mirrored the results obtained for the settling of P. As noted for P, additional studies to elucidate the reason(s) for the lack of settling of solids are warranted. Trial 3 The settling of solids in trial 3 followed patterns outlined for trial 1 (Figures 13a and b). There was significant depletion of solids in the top layers of manure even during the first one hour after filling the tank and about 60% of the solids settled out of the top 3 feet in 24 hours..about 65 to 70 % of solids settled out of the liquid when the trial was terminated (336 hr). The C/Co values for solids for the top 3 feet of manure were only somewhat higher than C/Co values for P and declined to values of about 0.3 in 72 hours. Both solids and P settled out quite rapidly and completely in trial 3 (Table 6). COMPOST The purpose for composting the solids was to determine whether or not composting of the manure solids would be feasible. The goal was to achieve a carbon to nitrogen ratio of 20 to 30:1, a moisture content of 50 to 60 percent and a temperature of 55 to 65 0 C. The manure solids from the two trials had percent solids content of 16 to 17 percent (Table 7). Total N, total P and other nutrient constituents were much higher for manure solids than for whole manures (liquid and manure solids) as expected. Thus, 17
35 Figure 12a. % Solids at Various Depths With Time - Trial 2 (0 to 200 hr) % Solids " from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom Time (hr)
36 Figure 12b. % Solids at Various Depths With Time - Trial 2 (0 to 400 hr) % Solids " from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom Time (hrs)
37 Figure 13a. % Solids at Various Depths With Time - Trial 3 (0 to 200 hr) % Solids " from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom Time (hr)
38 Figure 13b. % Solids at Various Depths With Time - Trial 3 (0 to 400 hr) % Solids " from bottom 18.5" from bottom 29" from bottom 41.5" from bottom Time (hr)
39 considerable concentration of nutrients from the liquid phase to the manure solids occurred, particularly for total P and total N. The concentration of all nutrients decreased, as expected, when the bulking agent was added. Total N decreased by about five fold. Compost 1 was allowed to stand for 19 days and compost 2 for 14 days prior to removal from the compost bin. Percent moisture for compost 1 declined from about 80 to 60 % during 19 days of composting. Moisture content for compost 2 declined from about 75 to 70 % in 14 days. Water from a severe rainfall event entered the compost bin and is the most likely reason for the high moisture content. Temperature for compost 1 increased to 66 0 C whereas temperature for compost 2 increased to 36 0 C. Composting of compost 2 occurred in late fall when air temperatures were about zero 0 C in the morning. The C to N ratio for the manure solids prior to composting was 12.0:1 and 15.6:1 for compost 1 and compost 2, respectively (Table 7). The C to N ratio for compost 1 was about 20 to 1 and after 19 days of composting was about 34 to 1. The C to N ratio for compost 2 and the manure solids used for compost 2 were very similar and varied from 16 to 17 to 1. The C to N ratios for the composts were in the range normally encountered for manure composts. 18
40 Table 7. Some Characteristics of Manure Solids and Compost Trial 1 - Compost 1 TP TN NH4 - N K Total Solids % Total C Temp C/N (%) Moisture C. Ratio Manure Solids 32* : 1 Compost (Initial) 1.2** _ Compost at 5 days < : 1 Compost at 19 days : 1 Trial 2 - Compost 2 Manure Solids _ 15.6 : 1 Compost (Initial) : 1 Compost at 14 days : 1 * Manure Solids Values expressed in lb/1000 gal ** Compost Values expressed in lb/ton
41 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Liquid hog manure was pumped into a settling tank (40ft x8 ft x4 ft in depth) and the rate of settling of P and solids investigated. Both P and solids settled out from liquid hog manure quite rapidly and completely when % solids in the manure was about 5.0% or less. Removal of P was about 75% whereas removal of solids was about 50 to 70% in the top 3 feet of manure within 24 hours. The N to P ratio of manures, initially about 5 to 6 to 1, was increased to about 15 to 1 in about 48 hr and to 30 to 1 at termination of the trials. The rates of settling were rapid enough to warrant more study and development of settling tanks or similar systems to remove P and/or solids from liquid manures. The settling of both P and solids was slow in a trial in which the manure contained a high percentage of solids (6.6%). Both the rate of settling and completeness of separation were poor. Studies are warranted to elucidate the reason(s) for the lack of separation in these instances. The use of precipitants and/ or flocculants in increasing rate and completeness of separation should be one factor examined. It should be noted, however, that liquid hog manures average about 3.5% solids and hence both P and solids would settle out by gravity in a settling tank or similar structures reasonably well. The handling and use of the manure solids requires further study. The volume of manure solids was about 15% of the total manure volume when both the solids and P settled out reasonably well. In this study the manure solids were composted. The study contained herein showed this to be feasible. However, in some instances this may not be possible (economic and/ or environmentally), and thus other uses for the solids needs to be investigated. Both the systems for handling of the manure solids as well end uses (markets) for the manure solids have to be studied. The manure solids were reasonably rich in nutrients and organic matter and hence would be a good soil amendment fertilizer. In the studies contained herein the settling of phosphorus and solids was studied in a batch system, (ie) the settling tank was filled with manure and the settling of phosphorus 19
42 and solids observed without any inflow or out flow of manure. Adoption and use of a settling system by producers would be much greater if the system could be operated as a flow through or continuous flow system even particularly if it operated satisfactorily for short periods of three to six months. The system would have to remove at least 50 % of the phosphorus from the liquid manure. Thus, it is recommended that the settling efficacy of systems, such as used in this study, be studied as a continuous flow system. A study of the use of the settling tank used in this study as a flow through system has been completed. A report will be available in May Results obtained indicate that the settling tank operated satisfactorily as a flow through system for about one month with the addition of about 1000 imperial gallons per day. 20
43 LITERATURE CITED Dick, S. et al, A Detailed Analysis of Ammonia, Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium and Moisture Content Profile Every 5 % Increment Throughout the Pump Out of a Circular, Single Cell and Two Cell Manure Storage System. A report presented to the Manitoba Livestock Management Initiative Inc. Funk, T Gravity Tank Low Cost Way to Separate Manure, Control Odor. The Pig Site. College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences. University of Illinois Slevinsky L F. et al, Soil Sampling of Manured an Non-Manured Fields. A report presented to the Manitoba Livestock Management Initiative Inc. Slevinsky L F. et al, Soil Sampling of Manured and Non-Manured Fields in Grass Forage Production. A report presented to the Manitoba Livestock Management Initiative Inc. Worley, J. W. and K. C. Das Swine Manure Solids Separation and Composting Using Alum. Appl. Eng. Agric. 16:
44 APPENDIX A Tables of Manure Analyses for Trial 1, 2 and 3 22
45 TABLE 1 - TRIAL1 MANURE ANALYSES OF SAMPLES TAKEN FROM SETTLING TANK - Aug. 11 to Sept. 11/08 TIME DEPTH DATE TP TN NH4 - N K TOTAL % TOTAL MANURE (hours) (inches) LB/1000 LB/1000 LB/1000 LB/1000 SOLIDS MOISTURE CARBON TEMP. O C GAL GAL GAL GAL % LB/TON 0 (filling) 11-Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Aug Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep < Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep surface 08-Sep sludge 11-Sep (lb/ gal) compost 1 11-Sep 1.2 (lb/ton) 9.3 (lb/ton) 7.0 (lb/ton) 0.6 (lb/ton) wood shavings 11-Sep 47 in % 1200 compost 1 30-Sep 1.7 (lb/ton) 9.8 (lb/ton) 5.0 (lb/ton) 0.80 (lb/ton)
46 TABLE 2 - TRIAL 2 MANURE ANALYSES OF SAMPLES TAKEN FROM SETTLING TANK Sept.16 to Sept. 29/08 TIME DEPTH DATE TP TN NH4 - N K TOTAL % TOTAL MANURE (hours) (inches) LB/1000 LB/1000 LB/1000 LB/1000 SOLIDS MOISTURE CARBON TEMP. O C GAL GAL GAL GAL % LB/TON 0 (filling) 16-Sep (filling) 16-Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep compost 1 16-Sep 1.7 (lb/ton) 9.8 (lb/ton) 4.9 (lb/ton) 1.4 (lb/ton) Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Note: sample taken at 14 as value at 8.5 was plugged Compost 65.0 Temp sludge 19-Sep Sep Sep Sep sludge 22-Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep surface 29-Sep compost 1 29-Sep 1.4 (lb/ton) 12.3 (lb/ton) 4.3 (lb/ton) <0.3 (lb/ton) C Note: sludge samples at 8.5 and 3.0 depths were not taken as valves were plugged with solids Note: a sludge and compost sample were taken on Sept 30/08
47 TABLE 3 - TRIAL 3 MANURE ANALYSES OF SAMPLES TAKEN FROM SETTLING TANK Sept. 30 to Oct. 14/08 TIME DEPTH DATE TP TN NH4 - N K TOTAL % TOTAL MANURE (hours) (inches) LB/1000 LB/1000 LB/1000 LB/1000 SOLIDS MOISTURE CARBON TEMP. O C GAL GAL GAL GAL % LB/TON 0 30-Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep sludge 30-Sep (lb/ 1000/gal) 12.0 compost 2 30-Sep 0.80 (lb/ton) 11.5 (lb/ton) 8.1 (lb/ton) 1.1 (lb/ton) Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct compost - temp Oct Oct Oct Oct compost - temp Oct Oct Oct Oct compost - temp surface 14-Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct Oct bottom 3 inches (no sample was taken as valve was plugged - the manure at this depth was watery with solids present) compost 2 14-Oct 4.4 (lb/ton) 12.8 (lb/ton) 9.5 (lb/ton) 5.1 (lb/ton)
MANITOBA CONSERVATION USE OF A CENTRIFUGE FOR LIQUID/SOLID MANURE SEPARATION
MANITOBA CONSERVATION USE OF A CENTRIFUGE FOR LIQUID/SOLID MANURE SEPARATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Manitoba Conservation administers the Livestock Manure and Mortalities Management Regulation. Manitoba Conservation
More informationManure is recognized: Solarization and use of compost in vegetable crops. Manure production. Why manure is a problem today but was not 50 years ago
Manure is recognized: Solarization and use of compost in vegetable crops Mohammed Zerkoune Holtville, CA December 3, 23 Source of complex nutrients Slow release of nutrients Improve soil physical properties:
More informationMANURE SOLIDS SEPARATORS
MANURE SOLIDS SEPARATORS Dr. John W. Worley Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Georgia
More informationSwine Manure Production and Nutrient Content
CHAPTER 3 Swine Manure Production and Nutrient Content John P. Chastain, James J. Camberato, John E. Albrecht, and Jesse Adams, III INTRODUCTION Knowledge of the amount of manure and plant nutrients produced
More informationLIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1
LIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1 John E. Sawyer Associate Professor, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist Department of Agronomy John P. Lundvall Extension Program Specialist
More informationLagoon And Wetland Treatment Of Dairy Manure
Paper No. 004126 An ASAE Meeting Presentation Lagoon And Wetland Treatment Of Dairy Manure by Peter E. Wright Senior Extension Associate Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering Cornell Cooperative
More informationThe University of Wisconsin-Platteville
Evaluation of Quality at Pioneer Farm and Suitability for End-Use By: Steve, Advisor Dr. Chris Baxter As livestock operations continue to grow farms are generating more manure. This excess manure is becoming
More informationDecember 2002 Issue # PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT ON HIGH PHOSPHORUS SOILS. Angela Ebeling, Keith Kelling, and Larry Bundy 1/ Introduction
December 2002 Issue #12 2002 PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT ON HIGH PHOSPHORUS SOILS Angela Ebeling, Keith Kelling, and Larry Bundy 1/ Introduction Soil phosphorus (P) is important for crop production. Phosphorus
More informationLivestock and poultry producers are seeking. Solid-Liquid Separation. of Animal Manure and Wastewater E
E-13 9-99 Settling basins are long, shallow structures using gravity to settle solids. Solid-Liquid Separation of Animal Manure and Wastewater Saqib Mukhtar, John M. Sweeten and Brent W. Auvermann* Livestock
More informationNutrient Management in Crop Production
Nutrient Management in Crop Production Dr. John E. Sawyer Associate Professor Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Focus On Agriculture Water Quality Hypoxia Pfiesteria piscicida Nitrate Tile Flow Sediment
More informationManure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations
Manure Management Facts Managing Manure within Tillage Systems and Crop Rotations January 2009 Introduction Manure is a valuable source of nutrients for crop production. Most crop rotations can be designed
More informationFrom City to Farm: Greenbin-derived Compost Agricultural Trials. Compost Council of Canada Workshop January 22, 2013
From City to Farm: Greenbin-derived Compost Agricultural Trials Compost Council of Canada Workshop January 22, 2013 From City to Farm: Greenbin Derived Compost Agricultural Trials Fertilizer value Organic
More informationOutline. Farmer Goals/Needs for their Soil 1/23/2017. Compost. Challenges Using Compost. Other Support
Outline Elsa Sanchez Brian Caldwell What are the farmers goals/needs for their soil? (Brian and Elsa) 5 min Nutrient building (Elsa) 20 min Soil tests and recommendations (Brian and Elsa) 5 min Nutrients
More informationUSDA-ARS Developed Technologies for Recovering Manure Phosphorus. Ariel A. Szogi
USDA-ARS Developed Technologies for Recovering Manure Phosphorus Ariel A. Szogi AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE Coastal Plains Soil, Water and Plant research Center Florence, SC Summary Environmental issues
More informationAvailability of Nutrients in Manure Jeff Schoenau Department of Soil Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Availability of Nutrients in Manure Jeff Schoenau Department of Soil Science University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK, Canada Role of Manure Manures, composts have been used to sustain soil fertility and
More informationShould I be Concerned About High Soil Test Levels on my Farm?
Should I be Concerned About High Soil Test Levels on my Farm? Ohio Swine Symposium, February 11, 2015 Greg LaBarge, Field Specialist Agronomic Systems Ohio State University Extension labarge.1@osu.edu
More informationManure Management. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management. June 2, Jarrod O. Miller, Ph.D. Extension Educator, Agriculture
Manure Management Fundamentals of Nutrient Management June 2, 2016 Jarrod O. Miller, Ph.D. Extension Educator, Agriculture Fertilizer Options? Manure Legumes Commercial Fertilizer Bio-Solids Chapter 9:
More informationAPPENDIX F. Soil Sampling Programs
166 Soil Sampling Programs Soil sampling for laboratory analysis is the only way to determine the levels of plant nutrients in a field and obtain fertilizer recommendations for that field It is also required
More informationFACTORS THAT AFFECT THE PRICE OF MANURE AS A FERTILIZER Ray Massey, Economist University of Missouri, Commercial Ag Program
FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE PRICE OF MANURE AS A FERTILIZER Ray Massey, Economist University of Missouri, Commercial Ag Program This paper discusses the value of manure as a soil amendment/fertilizer source.
More informationAct 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet October 2017
Act 38 Nutrient Balance Sheet Standard Format Word Version User Guide & Sample Nutrient Balance Sheet Pennsylvania Nutrient Management Program Pennsylvania's Nutrient Management Act (Act 38, 2005) Introduction
More informationChapter 4.1. Estimating Manure Inventory. learning objectives
Estimating Manure Inventory learning objectives Briefly explain the importance of determining manure weight or volume. Estimate the weight of solid manure in a pile. Estimate the volume of liquid manure
More informationThis page is for on-line indexing purposes and should not be included in your printed version.
This page is for on-line indexing purposes and should not be included in your printed version. Please have Word's AutoFormat features turned OFF. Author(s) First Name Middle Name Surname Role Email Robert
More informationGrant County Blake s Point RE, LLC information sheet for a sow farm
Grant County Blake s Point RE, LLC information sheet for a sow farm February, Purpose: To produce high quality weaned piglets to supply family pork producers located in the Midwest. Why Grant County: Ag
More informationFertility management in organic strawberries
Fertility management in organic strawberries Organic P management : P in composted manure is at least 70% as available as synthetic P fertilizer Using composted manure for N availability often results
More information15. Soil Salinity SUMMARY THE ISSUE
15. Soil Salinity AUTHORS: B.H. Wiebe, R.G. Eilers, W.D. Eilers and J.A. Brierley INDICATOR NAME: Risk of Soil Salinization STATUS: Provincial coverage (AB, SK, MB), 1981 to 2001 SUMMARY At very low levels,
More informationIMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS
IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS Theo Gunther Resource Management Specialist-Env. Programs Peter Kyveryga PhD. Director of Analytics - ISA Crop Yield and Nitrogen Loss effect of Rye can
More informationNUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIELD MONITORING 1. Bradford D. Brown ABSTRACT
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIELD MONITORING 1 Bradford D. Brown ABSTRACT Nutrient Management Plan Field Monitoring enables producers to evaluate the effectiveness of their Nutrient Management Plan implementation
More informationSAMPLE FARM Nutrient Management Plan
SAMPLE FARM Nutrient Management Plan General Overall, the nutrient management plan for the farm includes these components: 1) use of poultry litter when soil phosphorus (P) content and timing of application
More informationFORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD. Gerald W. Evers
Proceedings: Adjusting to High Fuel and Fertilizer Prices Research Center Technical Report No. 2008-01 FORAGE SYSTEMS TO REDUCE THE WINTER FEEDING PERIOD Gerald W. Evers Livestock require some form of
More informationPivot Irrigation of Livestock Manure Rick Koelsch, Livestock Environmental Engineer Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska
Pivot Irrigation of Livestock Manure Rick Koelsch, Livestock Engineer Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska Volume 7, Number 2 The selection of an appropriate land application method for
More informationSWINE WASTE TREATMENT IN TAIWAN
SWINE WASTE TREATMENT IN TAIWAN S.Y. Sheen, C.M. Hong, M.T. Koh, and C.C. Su Department of Livestock Management Taiwan Livestock Research Institute Hsinhua, Tainan 712, Taiwan, ROC ABSTRACT In 1975, the
More informationSuccessful 4R Nutrient Stewardship Extension Techniques: Fertilizer Rate, Source and Placement
Successful 4R Nutrient Stewardship Extension Techniques: Fertilizer Rate, Source and Placement John Heard, Mitchell Timmerman, Marla Riekman and Alvin Iverson (University of Manitoba) 4R Nutrient Stewardship
More informationLesson 21. Sizing Manure Storage, Typical Nutrient Characteristics By Charles Fulhage and John Hoehne, University of Missouri
LESSON 21 Sizing Manure Storage, Typical Nutrient Characteristics Lesson 21 Sizing Manure Storage, Typical Nutrient Characteristics By Charles Fulhage and John Hoehne, University of Missouri 1 MODULE C
More informationManure Composting Bin for Small Livestock Operation
Manure Composting Bin for Small Livestock Operation Masoud Hashemi, Atakan Kadi, and Kelly Kraemer Management of manure on horse farms is a challenge for horse owners and equine facility managers. This
More informationCalculating the fertilizer value of manure from livestock operations J.A. Moore and M.J. Gamroth
EC 1094 Reprinted November 1993 $1.00 Calculating the fertilizer value of manure from livestock operations J.A. Moore and M.J. Gamroth Livestock producers know that manure can be applied to croplands as
More informationOptimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era
Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era Tony J. Vyn Agronomy Department, Purdue University Abstract: Recent developments in biofuel demand and the rapid adoption of modern
More informationThe AgSTAR Program. Managing Manure with Biogas Recovery Systems. Improved Performance at Competitive Costs 1EPA
1EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Managing Manure with Biogas Recovery Systems Improved Performance at Competitive Costs The AgSTAR Program Office of Air and Radiation (6202J) EPA-430-F-02-004
More informationApplying Dairy Lagoon Water to Alfalfa
Manure Technical Bulletin Series University of California Cooperative Extension Applying Dairy Lagoon Water to Alfalfa This bulletin discusses use of dairy lagoon water on alfalfa and summarizes a field
More informationOn-Farm Mortality Composting Practices
On-Farm Mortality Composting Practices Dale W. Rozeboom Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University Animal Mortality Composting Workshop, August 27, 2015 28950 Penrose Road, Sterling, Illinois
More informationVIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION
VIRGINIA POLLUTION ABATEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM B ANIMAL WASTE Department of Environmental Quality VPA FORM B ANIMAL WASTE INSTRUCTIONS This form is to be completed by applicants requesting a VPA
More informationNo-till, Nitrogen and Manure Management
No-Till is here to Stay! No-till, Nitrogen and Manure Management Jeffrey Graybill, MS, CCA Penn State Extension Lancaster County, PA jgraybill@psu.edu 717-394-6851 It works! In 2009: 1.25 Million acres
More informationGeneral Recommendations for Fertilization of Turfgrasses on Florida Soils 1
SL1 General Recommendations for Fertilization of Turfgrasses on Florida Soils 1 J.B. Sartain In many neighborhoods, people envy the individual with the most beautiful lawn and think they cannot grow a
More informationEmerging Ethanol Industry: Implications for Animal Manure Management
University of Nebraska Lincoln Extension RP192 Emerging Ethanol Industry: Implications for Animal Manure Management Summary of Heartland Water Coordination Initiative Animal Manure Management Round-Table
More informationDivorne Farms Ltd SE W
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A TECHNICAL REVIEW REPORT PREPARED FOR THE RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF G R EY Divorne Farms Ltd SE 08-08-06W Dra November 22, 2013 INTRODUCTION The Technical Review Committee (TRC)
More informationNitrogen mangement for organic potatoes. Dan M. Sullivan Soil Scientist Oregon State University Corvallis, OR
Nitrogen mangement for organic potatoes Dan M. Sullivan Soil Scientist Oregon State University Corvallis, OR Dan.Sullivan@oregonstate.edu Hermiston Farm Fair Potato Seminar Nov. 30, 2011 Denitrification
More informationA G U I D E T O ed. Composter Location
A G U I D E T O Compos posting flood-r lood-relat elated ed animal mortalities Hurricane Floyd inflicted tremendous damage to North Carolina s agricultural sector. As of September 24, 1999, there were
More informationManure Processing Technologies 3.2 Separation
Manure Processing Technologies 3.2 Separation Mary Wicks and Harold Keener What Is Separation? Separation is the dividing of materials into various components. For livestock manures, it usually applies
More informationSoil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report
Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 216 Full Report Overview: This report summarizes Ohio State Soil Fertility Lab s efforts of a third party evaluation of proprietary soil amendments and foliar
More informationSULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING
Juliet Marshall March 3, 2011 Fertilizer Strategies: SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING Direct Seeding in Eastern Idaho Inadequate amounts and poor timeliness of rainfall events 2 1991 1993 1995
More informationBiofiltration is. The average odor. Treating Odor Emissions from Buildings Biofilters
Biofiltration is an air-cleaning technology that uses microorganisms to break down gaseous contaminants and produce non-odorous end products. It is used successfully around the world for treating a wide
More informationCover Crops and Nutrient Cycling TIM REINBOTT
Cover Crops and Nutrient Cycling TIM REINBOTT #1 Reason For Cover Crops: Erosion Control April 1 2014-5 inch Rain Soil Erosion-Even With No- Tillage Wind Erosion: When The Soil Is Covered Little Loss of
More informationLAND APPLICATION OF SWINE MANURE
CHAPTER 5a LAND APPLICATION OF SWINE MANURE Jim Camberato Land application of swine manure to crop and forest land is an effective way of recycling the nutrients back to the land. There are four key steps
More informationDetermining Fertilizer Formulations
Lesson C8 2 Determining Fertilizer Formulations Unit C. Plant and Soil Science Problem Area 8. Soil Fertility and Moisture Management Lesson 2. Determining Fertilizer Formulations New Mexico Content Standard:
More informationPhosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils
Phosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils Umass Extension - Managing Phosphorus in Organic Residuals Applied to Soils: Composts, Biosolids, Manures and Others November 2, 2016 - Marlborough, MA Jennifer
More informationBourgault Agronomy Trials March 13, 2017 Bourgault Industries Ltd Curtis de Gooijer PAg, CCA
Bourgault Agronomy Trials 2016 March 13, 2017 Bourgault Industries Ltd Curtis de Gooijer PAg, CCA 2016 Bourgault Agronomy Canola Trial Update Introduction The purpose of testing various Phosphorus (P)
More informationPOTASSIUM MANAGEMENT, SOIL TESTING AND CROP RESPONSE. Antonio P. Mallarino and Ryan R. Oltmans Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames
POTASSIUM MANAGEMENT, SOIL TESTING AND CROP RESPONSE Antonio P. Mallarino and Ryan R. Oltmans Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames Introduction New field research is conducted in Iowa as
More informationSwine Manure Nutrient Utilization Project
Swine Manure Nutrient Utilization Project Final Report March 31, 2005 John Sawyer, Associate Professor, Soil Fertility Extension Specialist Antonio Mallarino, Associate Professor, Soil Fertility John Lundvall,
More informationTruck Mixer, Agitator and Front Discharge Concrete Carrier. Standards. TMMB Printing
Truck Mixer, Agitator and Front Discharge Concrete Carrier Standards TMMB 100-01 2001 Printing Your Choice is Complete New Standards provide for mixing performance evaluated truck mixers with a size for
More informationPennsylvania Inter-Agency Nutrient Management Annual Conference TECHNICAL MANUAL VERSION 10 UPDATE
Pennsylvania Inter-Agency Nutrient Management Annual Conference TECHNICAL MANUAL VERSION 10 UPDATE Frank Schneider Nutrient Management Program Director 717-705-3895 fschneider@pa.gov Jerry Martin Senior
More informationProtecting Your Water and Air Resources
Protecting Your Water and Air Resources Montana Agri-Business Association Convention (Feb 1, 2013) by Clain Jones, Extension Soil Fertility Specialist and Adam Sigler, Extension Associate Water Quality
More informationSturrysore storage systems help dairy and livestock producers better manage manure to meet environmental regulations and protect the environment.
Sturrysore storage systems help dairy and livestock producers better manage manure to meet environmental regulations and protect the environment. REAP ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS With more stringent
More informationNUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FO 0792 F (REVISED 2016) Understanding Phosphorus in Minnesota Soils Paulo H. Pagliari, Daniel E. Kaiser, Carl J. Rosen, and John A. Lamb: Extension Specialists in Nutrient Management
More informationIntroduction. Objective: Livestock operations Current trend is towards large confined operations
2 Introduction Optimizing feed and manure management to reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions from livestock manure storage and composting Xiying Hao 1, Tim A. McAllister 1, Kim Stanford 2 1 Agriculture
More informationSEPARATION OF WASH/SPILLAGE WATER FROM DEFECATED MANURE
SEPARATION OF WASH/SPILLAGE WATER FROM DEFECATED MANURE Final Report Submitted to Manitoba Livestock Manure Management Initiative Inc. By DGH Engineering Ltd. March, 2002 Acknowledgements DGH Engineering
More informationNutrient Management. Things to Know. Chapter 16. Fertilizer Use Concerns. Goals of Fertilizer Usage. Nutrient Balance in Soil. p.
Things to Know Nutrient Management Chapter 16 p. 669-739 Goals of fertilizer use General concept of plant nutrient needs Fertilizer grades (e.g., 10-10-10) Fertilizer characteristics Application methods
More informationIrrigated Spring Wheat
Southern Idaho Fertilizer Guide Irrigated Spring Wheat Brad Brown, Jeffrey Stark, and Dale Westermann These fertilizer guidelines are based on relationships established between University of Idaho soil
More informationFeasibility of Hoop Structures for Market Swine in Iowa: Pig Performance, Pig
Manuscript No. SE1865 Feasibility of Hoop Structures for Market Swine in Iowa: Pig Performance, Pig Environment, and Budget Analysis M.S. Honeyman, J.D. Harmon, J.B. Kliebenstein, T.L. Richard Journal
More informationManure Management Manual Revisions
Manure Management Manual Revisions Jim Spontak PA DEP Farms In PA 63,136 farms in PA 33813 have livestock Average farm is 124 acres, about 75% under 200 acres Women as the primary farm operator increased
More informationField Evaluation of a Two-Stage Liquid-Solid Separation System at a California Dairy
Field Evaluation of a Two-Stage Liquid-Solid Separation System at a California Dairy John P. Chastain, Ph.D., Professor Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering Clemson University, Clemson,
More informationAnimal Units Calculation Table A B C D E F G Animal Type Type of Operation Proposed Existing Animal Annual Additional Total Animal Number of Units per Confinement Number of Units Animals Head Period (Days)
More informationTECHNOLOGY REPORT: ANAEROBIC LAGOON AND SPRAYFIELD
July 2005 (update of October 2004 version) Cost and Returns Analysis of Manure Management Systems Evaluated in 2004 under the North Carolina Attorney General Agreements with Smithfield Foods, Premium Standard
More informationP 2 O 5, tonnes. Beausejour Steinbach Winkler Portage Brandon Melita Roblin NW Interlake. % testing low
Phosphorus Fertilization Strategies for Long Term Agronomic and Environmental Sustainability John Heard (MAFRD), Cindy Grant (AAFC), and Don Flaten(University of Manitoba) March, Manitoba fertilizer phosphorus
More informationGROUND KAFIR AS A FEED FOR DAIRY COWS¹
GROUND KAFIR AS A FEED FOR DAIRY COWS¹ H. W. CAVE AND J. B. FITCH --- PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Because of its drought-resistant qualities kafir has to a considerable extent replaced corn in certain sections
More informationCommunity Manure Management Feasibility Study Dane County, WI
Report Community Manure Management Feasibility Study Dane County, WI February 2008 Report for Dane County, Wisconsin Community Manure Management Feasibility Study Prepared by: STRAND ASSOCIATES, INC. 910
More informationSoil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility. Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE
Soil Quality, Nutrient Cycling and Soil Fertility Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE www.wardlab.com Purposes of Soil Quality Employ new & modified crop management systems Increase efficiency
More informationNutrient Management in Kentucky
IP-71 Nutrient Management in Kentucky Nutrient Management Focus Group, Environmental and Natural Resource Issues Task Force AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCES FAMILY & CONSUMER SCIENCES 4-H/YOUTH DEVELOPMENT
More informationSummary of Manure Handling Systems in the Context of Hullcar
Summary of Manure Handling Systems in the Context of Hullcar A part of the Hullcar Situation Review Nutrient Management Practices - Technical Report October 2017 File No. 631.700-6 Prepared for: POLIS
More informationAnalysis of chicken litter
Using chicken litter to fertilise pastures Raw chicken litter can be a valuable resource to optimise pasture production. It is mostly organic matter and supplies nutrients, helps hold moisture, improves
More informationThird-Party Technology Verification of the Hydropath Technology at the Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility, Denver, Colorado
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Third-Party Technology Verification of the Hydropath Technology at the Robert W. Hite Treatment Facility, Denver, Colorado PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: DATE: Tal Journo/HydroFLOW USA
More informationPresented by: Jacob Howdyshell, Ohio EPA Central Office
Biosolids Rules Update (Ohio Administrative Code Chapter 3745-40) for Ohio Water Environment Association Biosolids Specialty Conference December 8, 2011 Presented by: Jacob Howdyshell, Ohio EPA Central
More informationTHE BENEFITS OF MANAGING MANURES WITH ALFALFA. Roland D. Meyer
THE BENEFITS OF MANAGING MANURES WITH ALFALFA Roland D. Meyer Abstract: Alfalfa is a major crop in California, accounting for approximately ten percent of the irrigated acreage, contributing significantly
More informationBasics of Composting Penn State Mushroom Conference David M. Beyer Professor-Extension Specialist
Basics of Composting 2009 Penn State Mushroom Conference David M. Beyer Professor-Extension Specialist Mushroom substrate has developed from a hodge-podge of ingredients mixed with water, fed through a
More informationMaster 5.1, Newspaper Articles. Special Edition December 14. Special Edition March 17
Master 5.1, Newspaper Articles THE DAILY HERALD Special Edition December 14 Study Forecasts Future Food Shortage A new study published in the Journal of World Agriculture raises concerns that in the future
More informationDo not oven-dry the soil
Fertilizing Corn Fact Sheet No..38 Crop Series Soil by J.G. Davis and D.G. Westfall* Adequate soil fertility is one of the requirements for profitable corn production. Nitrogen (N) is the most yield-limiting
More informationPhosphorus Extraction & Recovery. Copyright 2016, Renewable Nutrients, LLC
hosphorus Extraction & Recovery Copyright 2016, Renewable Nutrients, LLC Introduction hosphorus Removal vs Recovery Recovery Options Comparison of Recovery Technologies Intro to Quick Wash hosphorus Recovery
More informationCover Crops, Crop Nutrition. Dave Franzen NDSU Extension Soil Specialist
Cover Crops, Crop Nutrition Dave Franzen NDSU Extension Soil Specialist Nutritional benefits of cover crops- -Can trap nitrate reduce fall/winter/spring losses -legumes might produce N if they have time
More informationLAND APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE
CHAPTER 5a LAND APPLICATION OF POULTRY MANURE Jim Camberato Land application of poultry manure to crop and forest land is an effective way of recycling the nutrients back to the land. There are four key
More informationSmall-Scale Farmers and the Environment: How to be a Good Steward
L P E S Small Farms Fact Sheet series Livestock and Poultry Environmental Stewardship < L P E S > Curriculum : How to be a Good Steward By Mark Rice, North Carolina State University Summary Good stewardship
More informationNPX2800 FERTILIZER APPLICATORS
NPX2800 FERTILIZER APPLICATORS THE CASE IH FERTILIZER PLACEMENT ADVANTAGE THE PERFECT TIMING OF SIDEDRESS FERTILIZATION The primary objective of sidedressing is to give your plants nitrogen when they really
More informationAnaerobic Digestion. Waste to Energy Workshop for Farm, Food Processing, & Wood Industries. Presented To:
Anaerobic Digestion Presented To: Waste to Energy Workshop for Farm, Food Processing, & Wood Industries By: Rick Sievertsen SEBESTA BLOMBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC www.sebesta.com December 11, 2006 Biomass
More informationAssessment of Environmental Impacts from On-farm Manure Digesters
Assessment of Environmental Impacts from On-farm Manure Digesters Anna Crolla May 27, 2010 Benefits of Anaerobic Digestion 1. Production of renewable energy electricity and heat. 2. Permits the addition
More informationDRAFT REPORT. November Tim Sexton, Division of Soil and Water Conservation, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Richmond, VA
Recommendations to Estimate Swine Nutrient Production in the Phase 6 Watershed Model DRAFT REPORT Report to the Agricultural Modeling Subcommittee and Agricultural Workgroup November 2016 Report generation
More informationNASDA Enumerator Survey Training
NASDA Enumerator Survey Training Prices Paid March 2017 (FEED FARMER DEALER PP) (FERT CHEM FARMER DEALER PP) (FUEL FARMER DEALER PP) (MACHINERY FARMER DEALER PP) (RETAIL SEED FARMER DEALER PP) United States
More informationph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application
ph Management and Lime Material Selection and Application Quirine M. Ketterings Cornell University Nutrient Management Spear Program http://nmsp.cals.cornell.edu Acidity and ph Acidity = H + and Al 3+
More information2015 Pasture Productivity Trial
2015 Pasture Productivity Trial Dr. Heather Darby, UVM Extension Agronomist Abha Gupta, Lily Calderwood, Erica Cummings, Julian Post, and Sara Ziegler UVM Extension Crops and Soils Technicians 802-524-6501
More informationFor over 40 years, soil testing has been a recommended means
Part I Agronomic Crops 65 9 Soil Testing and Nutrient Recommendations Gary W. Hergert UNL Professor of Agronomy For over 40 years, soil testing has been a recommended means of predicting the kind and amount
More informationGrowing degree days and growth requirements for Corn.
Growing degree days and growth requirements for Corn. Growing Degree days are a daily accumulation of heat for crop growth. Corn does not grow when temperatures are below 5 F, and temperatures above 86
More informationWorksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture
PNW511 Worksheet for Calculating Biosolids Application Rates in Agriculture By Craig Cogger, Extension Soil Scientist, WSU-Puyallup and Dan Sullivan, Extension Soil Scientist, Oregon State University Overview
More information2/19/2013. Manure Management Introduction Thermochemical Technologies Introduction and Advantages
Keri Cantrell, Patrick Hunt, Jarrod Miller, and Jeff Novak USDA-ARS Coastal Plains Soil, Water, and Plant Research Center Florence, SC 29501 February 26 th, 2013 Manure Management Introduction Thermochemical
More informationFriendly Family Farms Ltd. SE E
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A TECHNICAL REVIEW REPORT PREPARED FOR THE RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF H A N O V E R Friendly Family Farms Ltd. SE 18-07-06E TRC 12-007 Draft January 17, 2014 A. INTRODUCTION The Technical
More information