How Does Envision TM. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Department of Transportation and. City of Alexandria, Virginia

Transcription

1 How Does Envision TM Measure Up? June 27, 2012 Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Milwaukee, Wisconsin Department of Transportation and Environmental Services City of Alexandria, Virginia

2 Agenda INTRODUCTIONS ENVISION TM PROJECT EXAMPLES CONCLUSIONS PANEL Q&A

3 INTRODUCTIONS ENVISION TM PROJECT EXAMPLES CONCLUSIONS PANEL Q&A

4 Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Milwaukee, Wisconsin

5 Located justoutside Washington DC D.C., inside the Capital beltway, 15 square miles 140, residents, educated, informed and engaged citizenry Significant ifi interest in environmental lissues Over 200 homeowner, civic and business associations Mayor and six other City Council members with City Manager

6 Ten Guiding Principles Land Use and Open Space Water Resources Air Quality Transportation Energy Building Green Solid Waste Environmental Health Eco City Charter Emerging Threats & Climate Change Implementation 6

7 Department of Transportation and Environmental lservices T&ES Divisions Construction and Inspection Division Engineering and Design Division Office of Environmental Quality Maintenance Division Division of Solid Waste Transit Services Transportation Division

8 T&ES Sustainable Initiatives Hybrid Busses LED Traffic Light Installation Green Roof on City Hall Accreditation LEED Police Station Bike Share 8

9 INTRODUCTIONS ENVISION TM PROJECT EXAMPLES CONCLUSIONS PANEL Q&A

10 THE ENVISION RATING SYSTEM

11

12 Envision is for Infrastructure ENERGY WATER WASTE TRANSPORT LANDSCAPE INFORMATION

13 What Is Envision? Self Assessment Checklist Project Certification Professional Certification i Guidance Materials Membership GUIDANCE MANUAL COMPANION TOOLS PHASE TOOLKITS

14 Envision Categories Purpose, Community, Wellbeing Collaboration, Management, Planning Materials, Energy, Water Siting, Land & Water, Biodiversity Emission, Resilience 14

15 Category Scores 15

16 Levels of Achievement No Negative Impact 16

17 Levels of Achievement LD1.1 Provide Effective Leadership and Commitment 17

18 Input Portal

19 Checklist 19

20 Rating System 20

21 Scoring Summary 21

22 Award Levels Recognition Level Total Applicable Points (%) Minimum in Each Category (%) Acknowledgement of Merit Silver Award Gold Award Platinum Award

23 Fee Schedule Registration Fee: $1000 Verification Fee Project Size ($) Non-Member Price ISI Member Price Up to 2M $3000 $ M $8500 $ M $17,000 $14, M $25,000 $21, M $33,000 $28,000 Over 250M $5000 per 100M above base price of $20,000 Appeals Fee: $500 per credit 23

24 24

25 INTRODUCTIONS ENVISION TM PROJECT EXAMPLES CONCLUSIONS PANEL Q&A

26 Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Milwaukee, Wisconsin

27 Department of Transportation and Environmental Services City of Alexandria, Virginiai i

28 Holmes Run Emergency Sewer Repair 28

29 Holmes Run Emergency Sewer Repair 97 / 166 = 58% Rehabilitation of failed assets Improving existing i park/recreational/wildlife area 29

30 Holmes Run Emergency Sewer Repair Sustainability as a Core Value 74 / 106 = 70% System Interconnectivity to Allow Flexibility in Future Operations 30

31 Holmes Run Emergency Sewer Repair 17 / 151 = 11% Reuse of Excavated Materials Onsite Monitoring Water Quality 31

32 Holmes Run Emergency Sewer Repair 96 / 182 = 53% Greyfield Development Restoring Sediments Eroded by Function of 32 Previous Infrastructure

33 Holmes Run Emergency Sewer Repair 42 / 116 = 36% Design Restores Stream Channel and Sediments While Preventing Future Scour Designed for 100 Year Storm 33

34 Holmes Run Emergency Sewer Repair 326 / 721 = 45% 34

35 INTRODUCTIONS ENVISION TM PROJECT EXAMPLES CONCLUSIONS PANEL Q&A

36 Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Milwaukee, Wisconsin

37 How Does Envision TM Measure Up in Eco-City Alexandria? Evaluating the New Infrastructure Rating System g g y against Our Principles

38 Benefits Standardized approach Another resource tool Helps decision makers make choices consistent with Eco City Charter Provides defensible project prioritization Feed into asset management practices Optional project recognition 38

39 INTRODUCTIONS ENVISION TM PROJECT EXAMPLES CONCLUSIONS PANEL Q&A

40 Thank you! Karen Sands Andrew Dane William Skrabak Denise Nelson, PE, LEED AP, ENV PV