SR nd Street SE to 112th Street SE (527 Widening) Mitigation Site WIN # A52720B USACE NWP (14)
|
|
- Marsha Harvey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SR nd Street SE to 112th Street SE (527 Widening) Mitigation Site WIN # A52720B USACE NWP (14) Northwest Region 2016 MONITORING REPORT Wetlands Program Issued March 2017 Environmental Services Office
2 Author: Cyndie Prehmus Editor: Doug Littauer Contributors: Tatiana Dreisbach Jennie Husby Tom Mohagen Sean Patrick For additional information about this report or the WSDOT Wetlands Program, please contact: Doug Littauer, Wetlands Program WSDOT, Environmental Services Office P. O. Box 47332, Olympia, WA Phone: Monitoring reports are published on the web at:
3 SR nd Street SE to 112th Street SE Mitigation Site USACE NWP (14) General Site Information USACE NWP 14 Number WIN # Mitigation Location LLID Number A52720B Construction Date 2006 Monitoring Period Year of Monitoring 10 of 10 Type of Impact Area of Project Impact 1 Type of Mitigation Planned Area of Mitigation 1 South of Everett and north of Mill Creek, Snohomish County Floodplain site: Shoreline site: Wetland 0.32 acre Wetland Establishment Floodplain site: 0.5 ac Shoreline site: 0.31 ac Wetland Enhancement Shoreline: 0.26 acres 1 Impact and mitigation numbers sourced from USACE NWP 14 Permit Number (USACE 2005) and from 25 June 2005 letter from WSDOT to Sandra Manning.
4 This Page Intentionally Left Blank
5 Summary of Monitoring Results and Management Activities (2016) 80% cover of native vegetation Performance Standards No more than 20% cover of invasive species The created wetlands will have soils saturated to the surface for a minimum of 12.5% of the growing season Soil in the wetlands will meet hydric soil criteria or be functioning as a hydric soil Document wildlife use of habitat and structures 2016 Results 2 Management Floodplain/Wetland Site Shoreline Enhancement Area Activities 90-95% cover (qualitative) <1 % cover (qualitative) Present Present Wildlife documented in prior reports 93% cover (CI 95% = 89-97%) < 5% cover (qualitative) Present Present Wildlife documented in prior reports Both sites: weed control Report Introduction This report summarizes final-year (Year-10) monitoring activities at the 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Mitigation Site. Included are a site description, the performance standards, an explanation of monitoring methods, and an evaluation of site success. Monitoring activities included vegetation surveys, photo-documentation, assessments of wetland hydrology, and a wetland delineation. Hydrology visits occurred on March 11, March 22, and April 5, 2016, and vegetation data was collected on December 13 and 14, Estimated values are presented with their corresponding statistical confidence interval. For example, 93% cover (CI 80% = 89-97% cover) means we are 80% confident that the true cover value is between 89% and 97%. 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
6 What is the 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Mitigation Site? The 1.3-acre floodplain/wetland mitigation site (Figure 1) contains 0.5 acre of newly established forested wetland and 0.01 acre of wetland enhancement and is located approximately one mile southeast of Silver Lake in Snohomish County. Compensation for project impacts also includes 2,700 linear feet of enhancement (consisting of 0.26 acre of wetland enhancement and 0.31 ac of wetland establishment) along the north and northeastern shoreline of Silver Lake (Figure 2). These sites were established and enhanced to compensate for the loss of 0.32 acre of wetlands due to road improvements along SR 527. The floodplain/wetland mitigation site and shoreline enhancement areas are designed to minimize erosion, enhance public access to Silver lake, enhance fish passage and fish habitat, enhance wildlife habitat, and improve water quality. Figure 1 Site Sketch The 527 Widening Floodplain/Wetland Mitigation Site includes a forested wetland community. The site contains three bays that provide flood storage for Silver Lake Outlet Creek. The bays connect to the Silver Lake Outlet Creek via narrow return-flow channels that extend into the center of the three bays. Log weirs and flow control berms line the channels. 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
7 Figure 2 Shoreline Wetland Enhancement Area Sketch The 527 Widening Silver Lake Shoreline Enhancement Area contains approximately 2,700 linear feet of enhancement and creation along the north and northeastern shores of Silver Lake. Appendix 1 shows the floodplain/wetland mitigation site as-built planting plan (WSDOT 2003) and the shoreline enhancement area planting plans (WSDOT 2001). Appendix 2 contains site directions Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
8 What are the performance standards for this site? The following performance standards apply to both the floodplain/wetland mitigation site and the shoreline enhancement area. Only five years of performance standards were written for these sites, but as per the USACE permit (USACE 2005), reporting is required through Year 10. The Year 5 performance standards are, therefore, considered to be the final performance standards and are being applied to Years 7 and 10 as well. Performance Standard 1 Starting in the third-year, performance will be based on percent cover instead of survival. The performance standard for native vegetation cover will be 60 percent cover in the third year and 80 percent cover in the fifth-year. Performance Standard 2 Invasive species will be controlled by mechanical and/or hand labor removal methods with the aid of weed control materials. The planting contractor will warrant control of invasive species for one year after completion of planting. WSDOT will retain a maintenance landscape contractor to control invasive species after the second year. If invasive control fails to keep invasive plants below 20 percent, additional invasive plant control measures will need to be implemented to achieve the performance goal that calls for less than 20 percent invasives. Invasive plants to be controlled are shown in Appendix 3, Table 4. The dominant invasive plants on this project are: Himalayan blackberry (Rubus laciniatus) Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) Japanese knotwood (Polygonum cuspidatum) Scott s broom (Cytisus scoparius) Performance Standard 3 The created wetlands will have soils saturated to the surface for a minimum of 12.5 percent of the growing season (approximately 26 days during March to October) in a typical hydrologic year. Performance Standard 4 Soil in the wetlands will meet hydric soil criteria or be functioning as a hydric soil as described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997) after five years. 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
9 Performance Standard 5 The wetland mitigation and buffer areas will create additional wildlife habitat and it is expected that wildlife numbers and diversity will increase. Nesting boxes will be added to the Silver Lake Shoreline for chickadee, wren, swallow and flicker. Small mammal habitat brush piles will also be added to the offsite floodplain/wetland facility. The proposed design for the offsite floodplain/wetland facility will also add structural and species diversity, winter cover, and shallow areas for invertebrates, and habitat improvements for fisheries in the Silver Lake Outlet Creek. The performance standard will be to verify use of nesting boxes and small mammal brush piles and to document use of the overall site by various bird and mammal species. 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
10 How were the performance standards evaluated? To evaluate vegetative cover, a 780-meter baseline was established parallel to the lakeshore in the shoreline enhancement area (Figure 3). Twenty-six transects were placed perpendicular to the baseline using a systematic random sampling method. The line-intercept method was used to estimate the cover of native vegetation (Performance Standard 1). Twenty-five four-meter-long line-segment sample units were randomly positioned along the transects. WSDOT staff collected hydrology data (Performance Standard 3) and soil profile information (Performance Standard 4) using methods described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0) (USACE 2010). Visual estimates were used to assess the cover of invasive species (Performance Standard 2). Wildlife usage has been documented in prior reports (Performance Standard 5). For additional details on the methods, see the WSDOT Wetland Mitigation Site Monitoring Methods Paper (WSDOT 2008). Figure 3 Shoreline Site Sampling Design (2013) The floodplain site was delineated in 2015 and the shoreline site was delineated in 2016 (see Appendix 4). 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
11 Are the sites successful? The native plant communities at both the floodplain/wetland mitigation site and the shoreline enhancement area have developed into dense, diverse native communities. Cover of invasive species on both sites remains low, and wildlife has been documented using both sites. Both sites meet all of the final-year performance standards. The floodplain/wetland site previously met all of its final-year vegetative performance standards, and on April 1, 2013; a request to discontinue all quantitative vegetation sampling on this site was sent to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This request was accepted on June 24, Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
12 Results for Performance Standard 1 (80% cover of native vegetation): Shoreline: 93% cover (CI95% = 89-97%) by woody species (Photo 1). Due to late sampling, herbaceous vegetation was not included in the sample design. Willows provide about a third of the cover. Sweet gale (Myrica gale), hardhack (Spiraea douglasii), Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) and Pacific ninebark (Physocarpus capitatus) each provide in the range of 10 percent absolute cover. Several other native woody species provide less than 10 percent cover. Wetland: Qualitatively estimated at percent cover with three layers to the canopy (tree layer, shrub layer, herbaceous understory) (Photo 2). Results for Performance Standard 2 (No more than 20% cover of invasive species): Photo 1 Shoreline woody cover (Dec 2016) Shoreline: Qualitatively, cover by invasive species was estimated to be less than one percent cover, consisting of reed canarygrass, Himalayan blackberry, and paleyellow iris. Cover by invasive species during the growing season would have been higher, but likely not more than five percent. In July 2015, this area was estimated to have less than five percent cover by reed canary grass, purple loosestrife and Himalayan blackberry. Wetland: Qualitatively, cover by invasive species was estimated to be less than one percent cover, consisting of reed canary grass, cutleaf blackberry, and Himalayan blackberry. In July 2015, this area was estimated to have one percent cover by reed canary grass and Himalayan blackberry. Photo 2 Woody cover in the Floodplain wetland (9 March 2016) 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
13 Results for Performance Standard 3 (The created wetlands will have soils saturated to the surface for a minimum of 12.5 percent of the growing season): Hydrology monitoring was conducted in 2016 on March 9, March 22, and April 5 at the floodplain/wetland site. During each of the three visits either inundation or saturation to the soil surface was observed in the intended wetland areas (Photo 3). Results for Performance Standard 4 (Soil in the wetlands will meet hydric soil criteria or be functioning as a hydric soil): During the April 2015 delineation of the Floodplain site, soils were too wet to excavate a pit. These soils meet definition of hydric soil due to prolonged inundation. Photo 3 Surface saturation (March 2016) Results for Performance Standard 5 (Document wildlife use of habitat and structures): Evidence of the use of habitat structures has been documented in prior reports. What is planned for this site? Closeout will be requested for both sites in Spring Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
14 Appendix 1 As-Builts Floodplain/Wetland Mitigation Site (WSDOT 2003) 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
15 Silver Lake Shoreline Enhancement Area Planting Plans (WSDOT 2001) 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
16 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
17 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
18 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
19 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
20 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
21 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
22 Appendix 2 Photo Points Floodplain/Wetland Mitigation Site Photo Points The photographs below were taken from permanent photo-points on December 14, 2016 and document current site development. 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
23 Photo Point 1a Photo Point 1c Photo Point 1b Photo Point 1d 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
24 Photo Point 2 Photo Point 4 Photo Point Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
25 Shoreline Mitigation Site Photo Points The photographs below were taken from permanent photopoints on December 14 th, 2016and document current site development. Photo Point 1 Photo Point Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
26 Photo Point 3 Photo Point 5 Photo Point 4 Photo Point Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
27 Photo Point 7 Driving Directions: To get to the Wetland Site from I-5 north, take Exit 186. Turn right and follow SR 96. Turn left at 19th Avenue Southeast/Bothell Everett Hwy/SR 527. Turn right at124th Street Southeast. Turn right at 25th Ave SE. The site is at the end of this road to the south behind a small chain-link fence. The Shoreline Enhancement Area is immediately west of SR 527 approximately one mile north of the SR 96/SR 527 interchange. 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
28 Appendix 3 Data Tables and Hydrology Well Locations Normal conditions were present for the three months before the hydrology field visits based on the data in Table 2 (page 26). Precipitation observed at the Everett station in the 10 days prior to the field work was heavy in early March, moderate in mid- March and light in early April based on Table 3 (page 27). Table 1. Hydrology Observations Date March 9, 2016 March 22, 2016 April 5, 2016 Surface Observations Shallow inundation or surface saturation covering about 3/4 of the intended wetland area. Inundation in the channels, creek is flowing, saturation near the edge of creek. Less water on site than previous visits, however there is still inundation in the channels and surface saturation throughout. Well ID # Water Level (inches below soil surface) 1 3" 2 1" 3 5" 1 6.5" 2 1" 3 5.5" 1 4" 2 3.5" 3 5.5" 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
29 Pit 1 Pit 2 Pit 4 Pit 5 Pit 6 Pit Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
30 Table 2. Comparison of Observed and Normal Precipitation (NRCS 1997) Monthly precipitation data for Everett, Washington. Long-term rainfall records a Month 3 yrs. in 10 less than Average 3 yrs. in 10 more than Rain fall a Condition dry, wet, normal b Condition Value Month weight value Product of previous two columns 1 st prior month Mar W nd prior month Feb N rd prior month Jan W Sum 14 a NRCS 2016 b Conditions are considered normal if they fall within the low and high range around the average. Note: If sum is Condition value: 6-9 then prior period has been Dry (D) =1 drier than normal Normal (N) = then period has been Wet (W) =3 normal then period has been wetter than normal Conclusions: Normal precipitation conditions were present leading up to the hydrology field visits. 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
31 Table 3. Daily Precipitation 10 days preceding field work, Everett, Washington Date (2015) Prior to March 11 visit Prior to March 22 visit Prior to April 5 visit Daily Precipitation (inches) a Date (2015) Daily Precipitation (inches) a Date (2015) Daily Precipitation (inches) a March March April March March April March 8 T March 19 T April 2 T March March April March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March March a NRCS 2016 Total: 2.91 Total: 1.21 Total: Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
32 Table 4. Non-native invasive species 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
33 Appendix 4 Delineation Report Place holder 527 Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
34 Literature Cited 1. Environmental Laboratory Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Vicksburg (MS): US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Technical Report Y Available at: 2. [USACE] US Army Corps of Engineers Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 14 Number [USACE] US Army Corps of Engineers Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0), Wakeley JS, Lichvar RW, Noble CV, editors. Vicksburg (MS): US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. ERDC/EL TR Available at: 4. [WSDOT] Washington State Department of Transportation SR 527 Widening Shoreline Planting Plans (Plan Sheets HP2 HP8). 5. [WSDOT] Washington State Department of Transportation Final Detailed Wetland and Stream Mitigation Plan SR nd St. SE to 112 th St. SE Widening. Seattle (WA): Washington State Department of Transportation, Northwest Region. 6. [WSDOT] Washington State Department of Transportation SR nd St. SE to 112 th St. SE Widen to Five Lanes 25 th Ave. Mitigation Site As-built Planting Plan. 7. [ WSDOT] Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT Wetland Mitigation Site Monitoring Methods Widening Wetland and Shoreline Enhancement Annual Monitoring Report
SR 520 Medina to SR 202 Eastside Transit and HOV (Yarrow Creek Wetland) Mitigation Site USACE IP NWS
SR 520 Medina to SR 202 Eastside Transit and HOV (Yarrow Creek Wetland) Mitigation Site USACE IP NWS-2009-562 Northwest Region 2018 MONITORING REPORT Wetlands Program Issued March 2019 Environmental Services
More informationI-405 Congestion Relief and Bus Rapid Transit Projects: Renton Nickel Improvement Project (Renton Stage 1) Mitigation Site USACE NWP
I-405 Congestion Relief and Bus Rapid Transit Projects: Renton Nickel Improvement Project (Renton Stage 1) Mitigation Site USACE NWP 2006-00097 Northwest Region 2016 MONITORING REPORT Wetlands Program
More informationI-5/Mellen Street to Blakeslee Junction (Horseshoe Lake) Mitigation Site USACE IP NWS
I-5/Mellen Street to Blakeslee Junction (Horseshoe Lake) Mitigation Site USACE IP NWS-2009-1211 Southwest Region 2018 MONITORING REPORT Wetlands Program Issued March 2019 Environmental Services Office
More informationI-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project (Rocky Run Creek) Mitigation Site USACE IP NWS
I-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project (Rocky Run Creek) Mitigation Site USACE IP NWS-2007-2080 South Central Region 2016 MONITORING REPORT Wetlands Program Issued March 2017 Environmental Services Office Author:
More informationWriting Performance Standards for Wetland Mitigation
Writing Performance Standards for Wetland Mitigation WSDOT Updated 08/23/17 Performance standards are critical components of any wetland mitigation report. These performance criteria describe measurable
More informationSR 161: Jovita Boulevard to South 360th St. Stage 2 / WSDOT Stream Buffer Mitigation (Agreement Y-9403) 2012 Final Monitoring Report
2012 SR 161: Jovita Boulevard to South 360th St. Stage 2 / WSDOT Stream Buffer Mitigation (Agreement Y-9403) 2012 Final Monitoring Report SR 161: Jovita Boulevard to South 360th St. Stage 2 (MP 31.95 to
More informationMonitoring Report #3 Kenston Lake Stream Restoration Bainbridge, Ohio
Monitoring Report #3 Kenston Lake Stream Restoration Bainbridge, Ohio Prepared by: EnviroScience, Inc. 5070 Stow Rd Stow OH 44224 (330) 688-0111 Year Ending: December 31, 2013 I. Project Overview The following
More informationCromwell Park Wetland Mitigation Year 3 Summer Monitoring
Cromwell Park Wetland Mitigation Year 3 Summer Monitoring October, 2013 Prepared for: Brian Landau Surface Water and Environmental Services Program Manager City of Shoreline Public Works Department 17500
More informationPORT OF VANCOUVER, USA PARCEL 1A NE LAYDOWN CRITICAL AREAS REPORT
PORT OF VANCOUVER, USA PARCEL 1A NE LAYDOWN CRITICAL AREAS REPORT February 2012 Prepared by: Port of Vancouver, USA 3103 NW Lower River Road Vancouver, Washington 98660 360.693.3611 CONTENTS 1 Introduction...
More informationJessica Shaw Agricultural Technician Washington State University Whatcom County Extension Suite 201 Bellingham, WA
Agricultural Waterway Buffer Study Whatcom County, Washington 202 Authors: Chris Benedict Regional Extension Specialist Washington State University Whatcom County Extension Suite 20 Bellingham, WA 98225
More informationWetland Delineation for the 53 rd Street Overpass Project Corvallis, Oregon
Wetland Delineation for the 53 rd Street Overpass Project (Township 12 South, Range 5 West, Section 4 West end of Tax Lot 120 & north side of Union Pacific right-of-way) Prepared for Benton County Public
More informationPeer review of submittal documents for the Fairhaven Highlands Project as they relate to Plants and Animals
5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 phone 206.789.9684 fax www.adolfson.com memorandum date to from cc subject Vikki Jackson, Northwest Ecological Services, LLC Lara Thoreson
More informationAppendix D Wetland and Stream Photographs
Appendix D Wetland and Stream Photographs WETLAND PHOTOS Wetland 5-1: north end of wetland in I-5 right-of-way (ROW), looking south. Himalayan blackberry is overgrowing wetland; scattered willows and
More informationSR 202 Stream and Wetland Mitigation:
SR 202 Stream and Wetland Mitigation: by Jon Gage, RLA, David Evans and Associates, Inc. Introduction WETLAND mitigation for the State Route 202 highway widening project by the Washington State Department
More informationWetland and Stream Sensitive Areas Study for Buffer Reduction Parcels and -0178, Lake Forest Park, WA
March 10, 2017 Darin Seader 2301 NE Perkins Way Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 AOA-4800 SUBJECT: Wetland and Stream Sensitive Areas Study for Buffer Reduction Parcels 866590-0181 and -0178, Lake Forest Park,
More informationSECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION
SECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION 10-1 INTENT AND PURPOSE A. Intent 1. The City finds that wetlands serve a variety of beneficial functions. Wetlands maintain water quality, reduce flooding and erosion,
More informationWETLAND ANALYSIS REPORT. POINT NO POINT WETLAND HANSVILLE Kitsap County, Washington
WETLAND ANALYSIS REPORT FOR THE POINT NO POINT WETLAND HANSVILLE Kitsap County, Washington Prepared For: Kitsap County Department of Surface and Storm Water Management 614 Division Street, MS-26 Port Orchard,
More informationPERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MONITORING PROTOCOL FOR TIDAL WETLAND MITIGATION BANKS. October 28, 2016
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MONITORING PROTOCOL FOR TIDAL WETLAND MITIGATION BANKS October 28, 2016 A. Tidal wetland mitigation banks shall conform to the following performance standards by the end of the
More informationWetland and Stream Sensitive Areas Study Boundary Line Adjustment/Reasonable Use Parcels and -0178, Lake Forest Park, WA
March 10, 2017 Darin Seader 2301 NE Perkins Way Lake Forest Park, WA 98155 AOA-4800 SUBJECT: Wetland and Stream Sensitive Areas Study Boundary Line Adjustment/Reasonable Use Parcels 866590-0181 and -0178,
More information270 Pullman to Idaho State Line (Sunshine Road) Mitigation Site USACE IP
270 Pullman to Idaho State Line (Sunshine Road) Mitigation Site USACE IP 200500225 Eastern Region 2018 MONITORING REPORT Wetlands Program Issued March 2019 Environmental Services Office Author: Trace McKellips
More information5.15 Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S.
I-70 East Final EIS 5.15 Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S. 5.15 Wetlands and Other Waters of the U.S. This section discusses wetlands, open waters, and other waters of the U.S. in the study area and
More informationChapter 10 Natural Environment
Chapter 10 Natural Environment Existing Conditions The Natural Environment Element addresses the protection, conservation, preservation, and restoration of the natural resources the Bayview Ridge Subarea,
More informationAppendix D: MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1
Appendix D: MULTI-AGENCY COMPENSATORY MITIGATION PLAN CHECKLIST 1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives o Describe functions lost at impact site o Describe functions to be gained at mitigation site o Describe
More informationPERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MONITORING PROTOCOL FOR NONTIDAL WETLAND MITIGATION BANKS. October 28, 2016
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MONITORING PROTOCOL FOR NONTIDAL WETLAND MITIGATION BANKS October 28, 2016 A. Nontidal wetland mitigation banks shall conform to the following performance standards by the end
More informationPublic Input Meeting. Proposed Central New York Wetland Mitigation Bank. March 20, 2017
Public Input Meeting Proposed Central New York Wetland Mitigation Bank March 20, 2017 What in the world is wetlands mitigation? What is a wetland? Hydrology (surface water or groundwater) Hydric soil Hydrophytes
More informationPlant, Wildlife and Wetland Assessment
WSU Project Site Plant, Wildlife and Wetland Assessment approximately 38 acres of the site would be in retained natural area, including passive use portions of the park and smaller natural areas in other
More informationWetland Identification/Delineation and Bog Turtle Habitat Screening Report for. S.R. 0097, Section 003 Two Taverns Bridge Replacement over Littles Run
Wetland Identification/Delineation and Bog Turtle Habitat Screening Report for S.R. 0097, Section 003 Two Taverns Bridge Replacement over Littles Run June 2003 Prepared for: The Pennsylvania Department
More informationSnitz Creek Park Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering District 8-0
Snitz Creek Park Wetland Mitigation Bank Prospectus Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering District 8-0 February 2010 In accordance with 33 CFR 332.8(d)(2), The Pennsylvania Department of
More informationHeron Glen Wetland Buffer Enhancement Project. Progress Report. November 15, 2005
Heron Glen Wetland Buffer Enhancement Project Progress Report November 15, 2005 Summary of Activity Since Last Report (August 2004) Weed Control There were few Scots broom (Cytisus scoparius) plants that
More informationPullman Airport Expansion Permitting Process Overview, Wetlands and Mitigation. October 25, 2017
Pullman Airport Expansion Permitting Process Overview, Wetlands and Mitigation October 25, 2017 Overview of the Airport Project The Pullman Airport Expansion Project includes: Realignment of Runway 6/24
More informationSociety of Wetland Scientists/ Association of State Wetland Managers Joint Regional Conference, Portland, OR, September 18, 2008
Reestablishing a Riverine Wetland Using Integrated Pest Management to Control Reed Canarygrass and Reference Wetlands Design Criteria to Restore Structure, Functions, and Habitat-Forming Processes Society
More informationCCSD#1 Stormwater Standards
SECTION 4 NATURAL RESOURCES AND VEGETATED BUFFERS The provisions of this section are intended to prevent and reduce adverse impacts and to enhance drainageways and natural resources. These requirements
More informationWetlands. DuPage County Stormwater Ordinance Update- Wetlands and Buffers. Is a Stormwater Permit Required? 7/13/2012
DuPage County Stormwater Ordinance Update- Wetlands and Buffers PRESENTED BY: MARY BETH FALSEY WETLAND SPECIALIST Wetlands Section 15-18.A.1.a: If a Stormwater Administrator has the expertise, he/she can
More informationCollaborative Opportunities to Restore Wetland Functions in an Urbanized Setting: Moses Creek Restoration Case Study
Collaborative Opportunities to Restore Wetland Functions in an Urbanized Setting: Moses Creek Restoration Case Study Presented to: SER 2013 World Conference Madison, WI 2013 Award Winner Presented by:
More informationAppendix C-3. Wetlands and Other Surface Waters Report
Appendix C-3 Wetlands and Other Surface Waters Report WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS REPORT Hatchet Ridge Wind Energy Project Shasta County, California Prepared for: Hatchet Ridge Wind, LLC Portland,
More informationI THOUGHT IT WAS JUST WET LAND: A GUIDE TO ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING FOR AIRPORTS ROAD SCHOOL 2018 SIMON DAVIES, SENIOR SCIENTIST MARCH 7, 2018
I THOUGHT IT WAS JUST WET LAND: A GUIDE TO ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING FOR AIRPORTS ROAD SCHOOL 2018 SIMON DAVIES, SENIOR SCIENTIST MARCH 7, 2018 Definition Regulatory Definition - Those areas that are inundated
More information39. WETLANDS Introduction. Wetlands and Waterbodies Cook Inlet Drainages
39. WETLANDS 39.1 Introduction This chapter summarizes the wetlands and waterbodies study for the Cook Inlet drainages study area (Figure 39-1). The objectives of the study were to determine and map the
More informationPerformance Standards for Target Hydrology
Performance Standards for Target Hydrology Steve Eggers Senior Ecologist Regulatory Branch St. Paul District December 10, 2015 US Army Corps of Engineers Introduction Target Hydrology: the hydrology necessary
More informationTHE TEXAS RAPID ASSESSMENT METHOD (TXRAM)
THE TEXAS RAPID ASSESSMENT METHOD (TXRAM) Wetlands and Streams Modules Version 2.0 - Final U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Regulatory Division For use within the Fort Worth District in the State of Texas
More informationS.R. 2027, Section 02B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat
S.R. 2027, Section 02B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form Description of Aquatic Habitat Water resources that exist within the project area include Hosensack Creek and two palustrine emergent (PEM) wetlands.
More informationVegetation Cover Type Mapping Study Plan for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Lewis County, Washington
Revised Vegetation Cover Type Mapping Study Plan for Energy Northwest's Packwood Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2244 Lewis County, Washington Submitted to P.O. Box 968 Richland, Washington 99352-0968
More informationRecommended Wetland Management Standards According to Management Class
Recommended Wetland Management Standards According to Management Class Measure Management Strategy Management Class Preserve Manage 1 Manage 2 Manage 3 Maintain wetland and existing functions, values and
More informationS.R. 4007, Section 14B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form. Enclosure C Description of Aquatic Habitat
S.R. 4007, Section 14B PADEP Environmental Assessment Form Description of Aquatic Habitat Cresheim Creek is the only water resource that exists within the project area. No jurisdictional wetlands were
More informationU.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Galveston District
Appendix II U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Galveston District SWG MITIGATION BANK PROSPECTUS TEMPLATE This Template includes the information required for a mitigation bank prospectus as outlined
More informationPublic Notice. MVK Ms. Tarmiko Graham (601) July 25, 2018 August 23, 2018
US Army Corps of Engineers. Vicksburg District 4155 Clay Street Vicksburg, MS 39183-3435 www.mvk.usace.army.mil Public Notice APPLICATION NO.: EVALUATOR: PHONE NO.: E-MAIL: DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: MVK-2018-336
More informationADDITIONAL TABLES AND INFORMATION
APPENDIX D: ADDITIONAL TABLES AND INFORMATION NE JACKSON SCHOOL ROAD (NE GRANT ST. - NW EVERGREEN RD.) PROJECT WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON Tax Lots Traversed by the Project Study Area 1N230AB00600 1N230BA04000
More informationSAN LORENZO VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAMPUS CENTER PROJECT WETLAND MITIGATION AND MONITORING PLAN. San Lorenzo Valley Water District
SAN LORENZO VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAMPUS CENTER PROJECT WETLAND MITIGATION AND MONITORING PLAN Prepared For: San Lorenzo Valley Water District Prepared By: Denise Duffy & Associates, Inc. 947 Cass St.
More informationJoint Public Notice AGENT:
US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District Joint Public Notice Application for a Department of the Army Permit and a Washington Department of Ecology Water Quality Certification and/or Coastal Zone Management
More informationMISSOULA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2018 COST-SHARE APPLICATION
MISSOULA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2018 COST-SHARE APPLICATION 3550 Mullan Road, Suite 106 Missoula, MT 59808-5125 Phone: (406) 829-3395 x 101 Email: info@missoulacd.org Website: www.missoulacd.org OFFICE
More informationFEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION AUGUST 2015 Table of Contents 1 Decision... 1 1.1 Project Description... 2 1.2 Basis for the FHWA Decision... 7 1.2.1
More informationNaomi Hansen. Todd: Rothwell, Rebecca (ECY) Monday, October 02, :12 PM Todd Boulanger La Center Riverside Estates wetlands
Naomi Hansen From: Sent: To: Subject: Rothwell, Rebecca (ECY) Monday, October 2, 27 4:2 PM Todd Boulanger La Center Riverside Estates wetlands Todd: I have briefly reviewed the Castle
More informationStream Buffer Evaluation Report
Stream Buffer Evaluation Report Snoqualmie Switch Station Improvements Snoqualmie, Washington for Puget Sound Energy February 23, 2016 Earth Science + Technology Stream Buffer Evaluation Report Snoqualmie
More information2015 Monitoring Report Year 2 Harmon Property Stream Restoration Aurora, Ohio. Corps Permit Number Prepared by:
2015 Monitoring Report Year 2 Harmon Property Stream Restoration Aurora, Ohio Prepared by: EnviroScience Excellence n Any Environment EnviroScience, nc. 5070 Stow Rd Stow OH 44224 (330) 688-0111 Year Ending:
More informationPROSPECTUS. Proposed Beech River Canal Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank
PROSPECTUS Proposed Beech River Canal Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank INTRODUCTION This prospectus provides an overview of Beech River Farms, LLC s (BRF) proposed Beech River Canal Wetland and Stream
More informationSaving Wetlands. Is saving Lives
Saving Wetlands Is saving Lives What are Wetlands? areas between water and land What are Wetlands? contain hydric soil - saturated by water. soil lacks oxygen when saturated land that is seasonally wet.
More informationStewardship Plan instructions REN Capstone 2010
Stewardship Plan instructions REN Capstone 2010 due May 14 th, 2010 as a Word document to TA & CD to client The stewardship plan (SP) is the project site owner s manual for clients and their designated
More informationSECONDARY WETLAND IMPACTS ANALYSIS
SECONDARY WETLAND IMPACTS ANALYSIS USACE File. SWG-2012-00153 During the development of the Grand Parkway (State Highway 99) Segments H and I-1 from United States Highway 59/Interstate Highway 69 N to
More informationPUBLIC NOTICE. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.
US Army Corps Of Engineers Wilmington District PUBLIC NOTICE Issue Date: June 17, 2014 Comment Deadline: July 17, 2014 Corps Action ID#: SAW-2009-00655 NC DOT TIP: R-4903 The Wilmington District, Corps
More informationPublic Notice of Application for Permit
US Army Corps of Engineers Alaska District ANCHORAGE Regulatory Division (1145) CEPOA-RD Post Office Box 6898 JBER, Alaska 99506-0898 Public Notice of Application for Permit PUBLIC NOTICE DATE: July 31,
More informationSW-71 BOYD HILL NATURE PRESERVE MITIGATION PLAN
SW-71 BOYD HILL NATURE PRESERVE MITIGATION PLAN BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project SWIM? Aquatic Control? Exotic Control? Mitigation Bank? Type No No Yes No Mitigation Wetland and upland enhancement Type Landowner
More informationStep-Pool Creation to Restore Fish Passage and Riparian Health
Step-Pool Creation to Restore Fish Passage and Riparian Health Jenny Kindig Water Resources Engineer Denny Mengel, Senior Environmental Scientist Steve Miller, Water Resources Engineer Gloria Beattie,
More informationSection 6: Stormwater Improvements
Section 6: Stormwater Improvements A major objective of this study was to identify opportunities for improvements to address the widespread water quality impairments caused by stormwater runoff in the
More informationAppendix E Preliminary Jurisdictional Wetland Delineation Report, JYL 2008
Appendix E Preliminary Jurisdictional Wetland Delineation Report, JYL 2008 PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT A portion of USS 3819 and 2664: Horton Lot and Statter Harbor Juneau, Alaska
More informationAppendix B Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist
Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Requirements Checklist The Submittal Requirements Checklist is intended to aid the design engineer in preparing a Stormwater Site Plan. All items included in the following
More informationDuwamish Waterway Self Guided Tour: Turning Basin Number Three and Terminal 105 Aquatic Habitat Restoration Sites
Duwamish Waterway Self Guided Tour: Turning Basin Number Three and Terminal 105 Aquatic Habitat Restoration Sites Text and illustrations in the following pages include: (1) summary information describing
More informationHabitat Restoration of Garoutte Prairie: 2016 Annual Report
Habitat Restoration of Garoutte Prairie: 2016 Annual Report 3/31/2017 Report prepared for the Bureau of Land Management, Agreement #L13AC00098 Report prepared by Anna Ramthun and Andy Neill Institute for
More information* For applicants utilizing bank for compensatory mitigation requirements, information below is not applicable.
Mitigation Plan (33 CFR 332.4(c)/40 CFR 230.92.4(c)) A mitigation plan is required for all forms of compensatory mitigation, whether permittee-responsible mitigation, mitigation banks, or in-lieu fee mitigation
More informationBASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORT
BASELINE DOCUMENTATION REPORT FOR LAKE FOREST ESTATES MACEDONIA, OHIO SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO September 15, 2006 January 5, 2007 Prepared for: Lake Forest Estates Homeowner s Association, Inc. c/o TransCon
More informationRIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL CITY CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1-1 Riparian Corridor Study and Management Plan Goals... 1-1 Study Area... 1-2 Importance and Functions of Riparian Corridors... 1-2 Habitat for Mammals, Birds, and
More informationMEMORANDUM. Proposed Amendment Regarding Minimum Buffer Width in Mapped Flood Plains:
MEMORANDUM To: Municipal Engineers Group From: David P. Gorman, PE, Village of Lombard Re: Regulatory Buffer Minimum Width Proposed Amendment Date: October 22, 2012 The DuPage Mayors and Managers Conference
More informationDECISION MEMO Robinhood Creek Helicopter Log Deck June, 2008
DECISION MEMO Robinhood Creek Helicopter Log Deck June, 2008 USDA Forest Service, Mt. Hood National Forest Hood River Ranger District Hood River County, Oregon Flooding in the fall of 2006 caused significant
More informationPERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MONITORING PROTOCOL FOR NONTIDAL WETLAND MITIGATION BANKS. April 3, 2018
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MONITORING PROTOCOL FOR NONTIDAL WETLAND MITIGATION BANKS April 3, 2018 A. Nontidal wetland mitigation banks shall conform to the following performance standards by the end of
More informationJoint Public Notice. Proposed Wetland Mitigation Bank. Linnton Mill Restoration Site Mitigation Bank, Multnomah County, Oregon
US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District Oregon Department of State Lands Joint Public Notice Proposed Wetland Mitigation Bank Linnton Mill Restoration Site Mitigation Bank, Multnomah County, Oregon
More informationMaitland Valley WATERSHED
Maitland Valley WATERSHED Report Card 2018 Maitland Conservation has prepared this report card as a summary of the state of your forests, wetlands, and water resources. WHERE ARE WE? We are one of 36 Conservation
More informationAppendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas
Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas This document should be read in conjunction with the CRCA Planning Policy. 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to summarize the recommendations
More informationAppendix A Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form
Appendix A Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form The Stormwater Site Plan Report Short Form may be used for projects that trigger only Minimum Requirements #1-#5. These projects typically fall within
More informationRESTORATION EVALUATION PLAN
RESTORATION EVALUATION PLAN Project Name: Ramsey Refugia Project Project Proponent: Columbia Slough Watershed Council Project Goal (the overall intent of the habitat restoration effort; in some cases,
More informationM E M O R A N D U M Clallam County Public Works Department
M E M O R A N D U M Clallam County Public Works Department TO: TO: Craig Jacobs, Public Works Director Joel Winborn, Division Manager FROM: Dave Lasorsa, Environmental Coordinator SUBJ: Wetland Assessment
More informationUpper Mississippi River. Systemic Forest Stewardship Plan. Executive Summary
Upper Mississippi River Systemic Forest Stewardship Plan Executive Summary St. Paul District Rock Island District St. Louis District August 2012 Introduction The Mississippi River is the largest riverine
More informationRIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1-1 Riparian Corridor Study and Management Plan Goals... 1-1 Study Area... 1-2 Importance and Functions of Riparian Corridors... 1-2 Habitat for Mammals, Birds, and
More informationMissouri River Recovery Program Shallow Water Habitat Accounting Summary Report. Kansas City District Omaha District 2014
Missouri River Recovery Program Shallow Water Habitat Accounting Summary Report Kansas City District Omaha District 2014 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Contents 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Overview...
More informationFebruary 6, 2018 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. SUBJECT: Update on Albeni Falls Settlement Agreement BACKGROUND:
James Yost Chair Idaho W. Bill Booth Idaho Guy Norman Washington Tom Karier Washington Jennifer Anders Vice Chair Montana Tim Baker Montana Ted Ferrioli Oregon Richard Devlin Oregon February 6, 2018 MEMORANDUM
More informationRiparian Ecosystem Restoration Projects of the AWPF. Abe Springer, Diana Anderson,
Riparian Ecosystem Restoration Projects of the AWPF Abe Springer, Diana Anderson, Jim Janecek,, Laura DeWald Outline Clover Springs Geomorphic setting Hoxworth Springs Climate change Lake Mary Watershed
More informationHow to avoid getting bogged down by the Nova Scotia Wetland Conservation Policy
How to avoid getting bogged down by the Nova Scotia Wetland Conservation Policy for the Environmental Services Association of Nova Scotia By Krista Hilchey Wetland Specialist, Nova Scotia Environment To
More informationWetland Delineations near Shediac, New Brunswick
Wetland Delineations near Shediac, New Brunswick A report to the New Brunswick Department of Environment and Local Government Theo Popma, Overdale Environmental Inc., tpopma@nb.sympatico.ca, 506-227-4829
More informationDepartment of the Army Permit Application
Department of the Army Permit Application DA File Number U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Honolulu District Date Received by CEPOH-RO Send Completed Application to: Honolulu District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
More informationWetland Monitoring. City of Edmonton. Edmonton Wetlands Workshop December 4-5, 2013
Wetland Monitoring City of Edmonton Edmonton Wetlands Workshop December 4-5, 2013 City of Edmonton Presentation Outline Kennedale Wetland Water Quality Sediment removal Vegetation management Biological
More informationCATEGORY a protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biodiversity.
29. ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA CATEGORY a protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biodiversity. The requirement to obtain an environmental development permit is cited in Section
More informationPhase II: Proposed (regulated) Impervious in disturbed area (ac) Long Lake Existing Impervious in disturbed area (ac)
Permit Application No.: 17-181 Rules: Erosion Control, Wetland Protection, and Waterbody Crossings & Structures Applicant: Hennepin County Received: 4/27/17 Project: CSAH 112 Phase II Complete: 9/5/17
More informationAPPLICANT: The RJ Group ATTN: Ms. Carrie Veldman 222 Grand Avenue, Suite B Bellingham, Washington Telephone: (360)
US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District Joint Public Notice Application for a Department of the Army Permit and a Washington Department of Ecology Water Quality Certification and/or Coastal Zone Management
More informationWood Canyon Emergent Wetland Project. City of Aliso Viejo 12 Journey, Suite 100 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
Wood Canyon Emergent Wetland Project City of Aliso Viejo 12 Journey, Suite 100 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Introduction Wood Canyon is located within Aliso and Wood Canyon Regional Park in southwest Orange County,
More informationKeeyask Generation Project. Reservoir Clearing Plan
Keeyask Generation Project Reservoir Clearing Plan April 2013 KEEYASK HYDROPOWER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RESERVOIR CLEARING PLAN Schedule 11-1 Joint Keeyask Development Agreement SCHEDULE 11-1 KEEYASK HYDROPOWER
More informationThe Beckett s Run Experience. Fort Wayne, Indiana
The Beckett s Run Experience Fort Wayne, Indiana Introductions Charlie Cochran City of Fort Wayne, Wet Weather Storm & Sewer Engineering Jason Durr, PE Christopher B. Burke Engineering, LLC 2 A Little
More informationClimate Change Impacts in Washington State
Climate Change Impacts in Washington State Lara Whitely Binder Climate Impacts Group College of the Environment University of Washington Evergreen College January 13, 2016 Climate Science in the Public
More informationAugust 12, Re: S.R. 2001, Section 002 Windsor Township York County, Pennsylvania Phase I Bog Turtle Survey/ T&E Coordination
441 Friendship Road Harrisburg, PA 17111 Phone: (717) 236-3006 Fax: (717) 233-0994 www.gtstech.com Engineers Geologists Environmental Consultants August 12, 2004 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Division
More informationHenry M. Jackson Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2157)
Henry M. Jackson Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2157) Fish Habitat Enhancement Plan: 2013 Annual Report (A-LA 12) Everett, WA Final This document has been prepared for the District. It has been peer-reviewed
More informationCESAM-RD-N January 10, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. SAM CMS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY MOBILE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS BIRMINGHAM FIELD OFFICE 218 SUMMIT PARKWAY, SUITE 222 HOMEWOOD, ALABAMA 35209 CESAM-RD-N January 10, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. SAM-2017-01301-CMS
More informationU.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District PRECONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District PRECONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION FORM May be used instead of Form ENG 4345 to request verification under a Nationwide Permit (NWP) Applicant: Address: City, State,
More informationShannon Claeson USDA Forest Service, PNW Research Station, Olympia, WA Olympic Knotweed Working Group Nov 16, 2011
Shannon Claeson USDA Forest Service, PNW Research Station, Olympia, WA sclaeson@fs.fed.us Olympic Working Group Nov 16, 2011 Perennial Dense monocultures Moist soil, partial sunlight Disturbed sites (rivers,
More informationRoots for Rivers. An Introduction to Floodplain Restoration & Steps For Implementing A Reforestation Project In Your Watershed
Roots for Rivers An Introduction to Floodplain Restoration & Steps For Implementing A Reforestation Project In Your Watershed Kimber Ray Resource Service Coordinator The Watershed Institute 609-737-3735
More information