SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST UPDATED 2014

Transcription

1 Purpose of checklist: SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST UPDATED 2014 Governental agencies use this checklist to help deterine whether the environental ipacts of your proposal are significant. This inforation is also helpful to deterine if available avoidance, iniization or copensatory itigation easures will address the probable significant ipacts or if an environental ipact stateent will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environental checklist asks you to describe soe basic inforation about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You ay need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for soe questions. You ay use not applicable or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You ay also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Coplete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decisionaking process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do the over a period of tie or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional inforation that will help describe your proposal or its environental effects. The agency to which you subit this checklist ay ask you to explain your answers or provide additional inforation reasonably related to deterining if there ay be significant adverse ipact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the forat of this teplate as needed. Additional inforation ay be necessary to evaluate the existing environent, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse ipacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of inforation needed to ake an adequate threshold deterination. Once a threshold deterination is ade, the lead agency is responsible for the copleteness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting docuents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and progras), coplete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please copletely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency ay exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environental Eleents that do not contribute eaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. background 1. Nae of proposed project, if applicable: City of Bridgeport Marina Park Shoreline Access Trail Iproveents 2. Nae of applicant: Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County (PUD) Attention: Scott Kreiter SEPA Environental checklist (WAC ) Page 1 of 22

2 3. Address and phone nuber of applicant and contact person: 1151 Valley Mall Pkwy Authorized Agent: Larry Lehan; Grette Associates, LLC East Wenatchee, WA S. Worthen St, Suite Wenatchee, WA Date checklist prepared: January 5, Agency requesting checklist: Douglas County PUD 6. Proposed tiing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Upon receipt of the required perits. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The PUD does not have any future plans or activities at the City of Bridgeport Marina Park, except the ongoing repair and aintenance of the public facilities. 8. List any environental inforation you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SEPA JARPA 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any governent approvals or perits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Shoreline Substantial Developent Perit (City of Bridgeport)

3 11. Give brief, coplete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies ay odify this for to include additional specific inforation on project description.) The proposed project will iprove the existing shoreline trail in the City of Bridgeport Marina Park. The Park is owned and operated by the City of Bridgeport and Douglas PUD. The park is located within the Wells Hydroelectric Project FERC boundary. The PUD is required to aintain the facility per the Wells Project FERC license. The proposed project will iprove the shoreline trail by replacing the existing trail with an ADA copliant trail. The proposed project will also result in a new section of trail that will iprove access throughout the park aking access easier to the boat launch parking area and restroos. The proposed project will entail the reoval of the existing trail, cut and fill to flatten out the trail grade, and installation of asphalt trail. The existing asphalt shoreline trail provides access throughout the ajority of the park. The trail is approxiately 5 ft wide and ranges in distance fro the OHWM fro approxiately 15 ft to over 100 ft. Overall, the existing trail is in good condition; however, there are several areas where the asphalt has deteriorated. Additionally, the existing slopes of the trail exceed ADA standards and do not provide access to the entire park and restroo (without leaving the park and utilizing the public roads without sidewalks). The existing trail is approxiately 1,070 lf and covers approxiately 5,643 sq ft, all of which is located within the 200 ft shoreline zone (510 lf and 2,743 sq ft within the 100 ft riparian buffer). The deolition of the existing asphalt trail will result in the coplete reoval of the asphalt along with any existing base. The deolition will result in the reoval of approxiately 41.5 cyds of aterial (asphalt and base) within the shoreline zone, of which 20 cyds will be reoved fro within the 100 ft riparian buffer. The aterial reoved will be loaded into a dup truck and disposed of at an appropriate off-site location, outside of the 200 ft shoreline zone. Prior to the deolition, a silt curtain will be installed around the project area to control stor water and runoff. Following the reoval of the existing trail, the proposed project will result in the cut and fill (placeent of select fill aterial) associated with the preparation of a trail base to ensure the trail eets the required slopes for a fully ADA copliant trail. In order to ensure an appropriate trail base for the ADA copliant trail a total of 307 cyds of aterial will need to be cut fro the site and a total of 591 cyds of fill will be required. This cut a fill will occur both within and outside of the shoreline zone and will occur over approxiately 34,046 sq ft. Of these totals, 294 cyds of cut and 591 cyds of fill will occur within the 200 ft shoreline zone, encopassing approxiately 33,318 sq ft (137 cyds of cut and 294 cyds of fill over 15,902 sq ft within the riparian buffer). The reainder of the cut (13 cyds) will occur over approxiately 782 sq ft landward of the 200 ft shoreline zone. The ajority of the cut aterial will be utilized on site for fill. If cut aterial is not suitable for reuse then it will be loaded into dup trucks and disposed of outside of the shoreline zone. These areas and quantities (listed above) are those required to establish a suitable trail base and do not include those required for the asphalt trail. The cut and fill will occur using an excavator and final grade will be accoplished using a bulldozer. Once the final grade is achieved the aterial will be copacted. The proposed cut and fill will priarily occur landward of the existing shoreline trail. The only exception to this is the new portion of the trail between the existing trail and the boat launch parking area. The cut and fill in this area will occur within the 100 ft riparian buffer. In order to achieve final grade on the upriver portion of the trail (adjacent to 10 th St), a sall block wall will be required on the landward side of the trail. This wall is required in order to keep the entirety of the work on the park property. The proposed block wall will be approxiately 118 lf and will occur entirely within the 100 ft riparian buffer. However, all of the wall will occur landward of the existing trail. The average height of the block wall will be approxiately 1.5 ft and is will consist of the placeent of Keystone type block.

4 Following the establishent of final trail grade, the proposed project will entail the placeent of base aterial (crushed surfacing top course) over the entire trail footprint. The proposed trail will be 1,736 lf encopassing 14,011 sq ft. The proposed trail will be 8 ft wide and will be installed both within and outside of the 200 ft shoreline zone. Approxiately 1,657 lf (13,377 sq ft) of the shoreline trail will be installed within the 200 ft shoreline zone (760 lf and 6,138 sq ft within the 100 ft riparian buffer). The reaining 79 lf will be installed outside of the 200 ft shoreline zone (634 sq ft). The placeent of base aterial will entail the installation of 6 of crushed surfacing top course (CSTC). Once placed, the CSTC will be graded flat and copacted. In total, the proposed project will result in the placeent of 260 cyds of CSTC (248 cyds within the 200 ft shoreline zone and 12 cyds landward of the 200 ft shoreline zone). Once the base aterial is copacted and graded flat, the proposed project will install asphalt for the trail surface. The proposed depth of asphalt will be 2 resulting in a total of 87 cyds of asphalt being installed (83 cyds within the 200 ft shoreline zone and 4 cyds outside of the 200 ft shoreline zone). The asphalt will be installed using standard ethods for asphalt. All access to the site will occur through the uplands and existing lawn grass area. Following the copletion of the installation of the asphalt trail the entire disturbed area will be revegetated with lawn grass. The proposed project would result in no adverse ipacts to the existing aquatic, riparian, or upland habitat. In total, the proposed project will result in the disturbance of approxiately 33,318 sq ft of the shoreline zone (728 sq ft outside of the shoreline zone) and the installation of an approxiately 1,657 lf of trail (13,377 sq ft) within the shoreline zone (79 lf and 634 sq ft outside of the shoreline zone). The proposed iproveents will occur within a portion of the shoreline that consists of owed and aintained lawn grass, which provide little if any habitat functions and values. The proposed project will not result in the reoval or disturbance in native vegetation or habitat. The proposed project will not result in any change in use of the area and will only result in an increase in public use of the park. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient inforation for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity ap, and topographic ap, if reasonably available. While you should subit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate aps or detailed plans subitted with any perit applications related to this checklist. The proposed project is located at the City of Bridgeport Marina Park. Parcel Nubers and Section 15, Township 29 North, Range 25 East N lat / W long. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, ountainous, other The property is currently being used as a park with lawn grass down to the OHWM of the Colubia River. Vegetation at the park is doinated by lawn/grass with few large trees within the park and soe shrubs (el and black locust) within approxiately 10 ft of the OHWM. The riparian and

5 upland portions park and boat launch provide very liited habitat due to use (huan disturbance) and lack of suitable habitat. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approxiate percent slope)? Approxiately 90% along the steep shoreline slope. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for exaple, clay, sand, gravel, peat, uck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify the and note any agricultural land of long-ter coercial significance and whether the proposal results in reoving any of these soils. Soils on the site consist of sand, silt, and cobble. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the iediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no indications or history of unstable soils at the site or in the iediate vicinity. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approxiate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Existing Trail Areas: Within 100 riparian buffer 510 LF, 2,743 SQ FT, average of 5 wide Within 200 shoreline zone 560 LF, 2,900 SQ FT, average of 5 wide Note: All of the existing trail is within the 200 shoreline zone. Aount of Asphalt Reoved: Within 100 riparian buffer 2,743 SQ 0.2 depth = 20 CY Within 200 shoreline zone - 2,900 SQ 0.2 depth = 21.5 CY Fill for Trail Base: Within 100 riparian buffer 137 CY Cut; 294 CY Fill; 15,902 SQ FT of disturbed area. Within 200 shoreline zone 157 CY Cut; 297 CY Fill: 17,416 SQ FT of disturbed area. Outside of 200 shoreline zone 13 CY Cut, 0 CY Fill, 728 SQ FT of disturbed area. All areas and quantities are grading liits and do not include crushed surfacing or asphalt. Proposed Trail Area: Within 100 riparian buffer 6,138 SQ FT, 760 LF, 8 width Within 200 shoreline zone 7,239 SQ FT, 897 LF, 8 width Outside of 200 shoreline zone 634 SQ FT, 79 LF, 8 width Aount of Asphalt Installed: Within 100 riparian buffer 1,023 CU FT, 38 CY Within 200 shoreline zone 1,206 CU FT, 45 CY Outside of 200 shoreline zone 106 CU FT, 4 CY Note: Plan depth of HMA is 2. Aount of Base Material Installed (crushed surfacing top course): Within 100 riparian buffer 3,069 CU FT, 114 CY Within 200 shoreline zone 3,620 CU FT, 134 CY Outside of 200 shoreline zone 317 CU FT, 12 CY Note: Plan depth of CSTC is 6. Block Wall Installation: Length = 118 LF of Keystone type block.

6 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No erosion will occur as a result of the proposed project. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with ipervious surfaces after project construction (for exaple, asphalt or buildings)? The proposed project will not result in an increase in ipervious surfaces at the site. h. Proposed easures to reduce or control erosion, or other ipacts to the earth, if any: Since no erosion is expected to occur with this project, no control easures have been proposed. 2. Air a. What types of eissions to the air would result fro the proposal during construction, operation, and aintenance when the project is copleted? If any, generally describe and give approxiate quantities if known. Minial, short-ter eissions will occur as a result of gas-powered construction achinery used to construct the project. Long-ter, the proposed project would not increase eissions. b. Are there any off-site sources of eissions or odor that ay affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed easures to reduce or control eissions or other ipacts to air, if any: None proposed. 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the iediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streas, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide naes. If appropriate, state what strea or river it flows into. The property is located adjacent to the Colubia River. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The proposed project will take place adjacent to the Colubia River (all within 200 ft of the shoreline).

7 3) Estiate the aount of fill and dredge aterial that would be placed in or reoved fro surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill aterial. The proposed project will not entail in the placeent or reoval of any aterial fro surface water or wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approxiate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. There is no apped floodplain on the Colubia River in this location. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste aterials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volue of discharge. No waste aterial will be discharged. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn fro a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approxiate quantities withdrawn fro the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approxiate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste aterial that will be discharged into the ground fro septic tanks or other sources, if any (for exaple: Doestic sewage; industrial, containing the following cheicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the syste, the nuber of such systes, the nuber of houses to be served (if applicable), or the nuber of anials or huans the syste(s) are expected to serve. No waste aterial will be discharged. c. Water runoff (including storwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stor water) and ethod of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. No surface water runoff anageent will be required as a result of this project, as all storwater will be contained in the lawn grass area of the park.

8 2) Could waste aterials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste aterials will enter ground or surface waters. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No d. Proposed easures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern ipacts, if any: None proposed. 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: _X deciduous tree: alder, aple, aspen, other _X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _X shrubs _X grass pasture crop or grain orchards, vineyards or other peranent crops. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, ilfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and aount of vegetation will be reoved or altered? The proposed project will occur within a City park is doinated by lawn grass. The proposed project will reove approxiately 28,403 sq ft of lawn grass for the cut and fill portion of the project. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. Species listed under the ESA that ay be present in the vicinity of the property include Ute ladies - tresses (Spirants diluvia is threatened). No Ute ladies -tresses were identified on site, and suitable habitat is not present. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other easures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Following the installation of the shoreline trail all of the disturbed areas (cut and fill disturbance) will be revegetated with lawn grass. The proposed project will not result in the reoval of any native vegetation and will not result in any adverse ipacts to the existing aquatic, riparian, and upland habitat. Due to the low level of habitat functions and values provided by the existing conditions the proposed project will not result in a net loss of habitat functions and values. As a result, the proposed project will not result in ipacts that require copensatory itigation. No itigation is being proposed.

9 e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None known. 5. Anials a. List any birds and other anials which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Exaples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: aals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. Species listed under the ESA that ay be present in the vicinity of the Project Area include the Upper Colubia River Spring-run Chinook salon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha - endangered), Upper Colubia River steelhead (O. ykiss endangered), Colubia River bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus threatened) and bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus threatened). c. Is the site part of a igration route? If so, explain. Yes. The area is also used as a igration route by waterfowl. d. Proposed easures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposed project will have no negative ipact on water quality, water supply, recreation, or aesthetics of the Colubia River. The proposed project will replace the existing deteriorating public shoreline trail. Any potential ipacts to fish, aquatic habitat, riparian habitat, and upland habitat would be sufficiently iniized by the conforance with the proposed Best Manageent Practices (BMP s) and the design considerations. In addition to the design consideration, the project will also confor with the following avoidance and iniization easures: No existing native vegetation or large trees will be reoved or daaged. Extree care would be taken to prevent any petroleu products, cheicals, or other toxic or deleterious aterials fro entering the water. If a spill were to occur, work would be stopped iediately, steps would be taken to contain the aterial, and appropriate agency notifications would be ade. Prior to coenceent of excavation, fill, asphalt reoval a silt curtain will be installed waterward of the project area to iniize turbidity and to ensure that no debris leaves the work area. All equipent operating waterward of the OHWM would be inspected daily for fluid leaks. Leaking equipent would be repaired prior to resuing operation. The Contractor would develop and ipleent a site-specific spill prevention, containent, and control (SPCC) plan, and is responsible for containent and reoval of any toxicants released. All exposed or disturbed areas, including upland staging areas, would be stabilized to prevent erosion. All erosion control devices would be inspected during construction to ensure that they are

10 working adequately. Overall, the proposed project will result in no adverse ipacts the Colubia River. Overall, the proposed project will result in no net loss of ecological habitat functions and values. Copensatory itigation is required when a proposed project will result in a net reduction of habitat functions and values and will reduce habitat conditions for aquatic and upland species. The proposed project will result in work within the riparian buffer; however, the proposed project will not ipact the existing habitat functions and values due to the fact that the entire area where the project will occur consists of owed and aintained lawn grass. The proposed excavation, fill, reoval of existing trail, and installation of the new trail will not disturb any native vegetation (only lawn grass). The existing lawn grass provides little if any habitat functions and values, thus no copensatory itigation is required. The proposed project will iprove the public use of the existing park as it will repair the existing trail and ensure that the trail is ADA copliant. As stated above, the proposed trail iproveents have been designed to significantly avoid and iniize the ipacts to the existing riparian and aquatic environent. The construction ipacts will be eliinated through the incorporation of the proposed BMP s. The existing park is heavily utilized and the proposed trail iproveents will not result in a change in use of the park rather represents an iproveent of the conditions at the park. Based on the existing conditions, project design, and BMP s that will be incorporated, the proposed project will not result in any adverse effects copared to the existing conditions. Thus, no copensatory itigation will be required or proposed. e. List any invasive anial species known to be on or near the site. None. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to eet the copleted project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, anufacturing, etc. No energy will be required to eet the copleted projects need. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed easures to reduce or control energy ipacts, if any: None proposed.

11 7. Environental health a. Are there any environental health hazards, including exposure to toxic cheicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No environental health hazards are associated with this project. 1) Describe any known or possible containation at the site fro present or past uses. None known 2) Describe existing hazardous cheicals/conditions that ight affect project developent and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None known. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous cheicals that ight be stored, used, or produced during the project's developent or construction, or at any tie during the operating life of the project. None known 4) Describe special eergency services that ight be required. None required. 5) Proposed easures to reduce or control environental health hazards, if any: Environental health hazards are not expected through the developent of this project. Only approved construction aterials will be used in construction of this project. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which ay affect your project (for exaple: traffic, equipent, operation, other)? No noise exists in the surrounding area that would affect the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-ter or a long-ter basis (for exaple: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would coe fro the site. Typical construction equipent operation (excavator and truck noise) will occur at the site. This noise will only occur during construction activities and will be liited to daylight hours. Long ter use will be the sae as the existing level of noise.

12 3) Proposed easures to reduce or control noise ipacts, if any: None proposed. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The current use of the property is a public park and boat launch, with associated parking, owned and operated by the City of Bridgeport and Douglas PUD. The upland is priarily lawn grass, paved parking areas, access roads and park aenities (playground, cap sites, etc). Below OHWM, the property is used recreationally as a public park for swiing and launching watercraft. The uses of the adjacent upland properties are priarily residential. The current use of the adjacent property waterward of the OHWM is public lands associated with the Wells Hydroelectric Project. b. Has the project site been used as working farlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How uch agricultural or forest land of long-ter coercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how any acres in farland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfar or nonforest use? No 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working far or forest land noral business operations, such as oversize equipent access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures currently on the property include a boat launch, swi float, kayak handling launch, kayak handling float (currently reoved fro the water for season), two renant piles, playground, bathroos, and sall utility buildings. d. Will any structures be deolished? If so, what? The existing asphalt shoreline trail will be deolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Public Use f. What is the current coprehensive plan designation of the site? Public Use g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline aster progra designation of the site? Urban

13 h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. No; however, the shoreline of the Colubia River (aquatic and riparian) are protected. i. Approxiately how any people would reside or work in the copleted project? None. j. Approxiately how any people would the copleted project displace? None k. Proposed easures to avoid or reduce displaceent ipacts, if any: None proposed. L. Proposed easures to ensure the proposal is copatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed project will replace the existing shoreline trail with an ADA copliant asphalt trail that will increase public access within the park. The proposed project will ensure the continued safe use of the park and increase the access to the boat launch parking area and restroos, which is the existing and projected land use. The proposed use is copatible with the existing and projected land uses and plans as the proposed use is the sae as the existing use.. Proposed easures to ensure the proposal is copatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-ter coercial significance, if any: None proposed. 9. Housing a. Approxiately how any units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, iddle, or low-incoe housing. None b. Approxiately how any units, if any, would be eliinated? Indicate whether high, iddle, or low-incoe housing. None c. Proposed easures to reduce or control housing ipacts, if any: None proposed.

14 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building aterial(s) proposed? Approxiately 1.5 to 2 ft block wall. b. What views in the iediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views in the iediate vicinity will be altered or obstructed as a result of the proposed project. c. Proposed easures to reduce or control aesthetic ipacts, if any: None proposed. 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What tie of day would it ainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare fro the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare ay affect your proposal? No off-site sources of light that will affect the proposal currently exist. d. Proposed easures to reduce or control light and glare ipacts, if any: None proposed. 12. Recreation a. What designated and inforal recreational opportunities are in the iediate vicinity? Inforal recreational opportunities in the iediate vicinity include fishing, boating, water skiing, and other typical water sports. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No

15 c. Proposed easures to reduce or control ipacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: No easures to reduce or control ipacts on recreation are proposed. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. No sites are known to be present within project boundaries. b. Are there any landarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This ay include huan burials or old ceeteries. Are there any aterial evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural iportance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None known on or adjacent to the site. c. Describe the ethods used to assess the potential ipacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Exaples include consultation with tribes and the departent of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic aps, GIS data, etc. There is no potential to disturb cultural and historic resources as the project will occur to an existing park along a portion of the shoreline that has been significantly disturbed as part of the historic and current use of the site. There are no previously recorded archaeological resources at this location. d. Proposed easures to avoid, iniize, or copensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any perits that ay be required. Under Douglas PUD s Historic Properties Manageent Plan Inadvertent Discovery Protocol, contractors and workers will be infored to iediately stop work if artifacts of historical or cultural iportance are found. If any are found, work will iediately stop and the land owner (PUD) will be notified along with the Washington State Historic Preservation Office. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street syste. Show on site plans, if any. Hwy 173 passes through Bridgeport, which provides access to Colubia Avenue, which provides access to 7 th St and 10 th St, which provide access to each side of the park. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approxiate distance to the nearest transit stop? No

16 c. How any additional parking spaces would the copleted project or non-project proposal have? How any would the project or proposal eliinate? No new parking spaces will be required; no parking spaces will be eliinated. d. Will the proposal require any new or iproveents to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new roads or road iproveents will be required for the project. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the iediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The project will not facilitate a transportation use. The priary access to the site is and will continue to be by road. f. How any vehicular trips per day would be generated by the copleted project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volues would occur and what percentage of the volue would be trucks (such as coercial and no passenger vehicles). What data or transportation odels were used to ake these estiates? No vehicular trips would be generated by the coplete project. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the oveent of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. h. Proposed easures to reduce or control transportation ipacts, if any: No easures are proposed. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for exaple: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The proposed project will not result in an increased need for public services. b. Proposed easures to reduce or control direct ipacts on public services, if any. No easures are proposed.

17 All of these services are present adjacent to the property. other a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity!, natural gas, [water], [refuse service), telephone, [sanitary sewer, septic syste, Position and Agency/Organization Nae of signee Scott Kreiter Date Subitted: 1 / o " ' / 7 County Land-use Representative Public Utility District #1 of Douglas Signature: CL 2^ agency is relying on the to ake its decision. C. Signature The above answers are true and coplete to the best of y knowledge. I understand that the lead No new utilities are proposed or required for this project. and the general construction activities on the site or in the iediate vicinity which ight be needed. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, 16. Utilities

18 r 4' «o s - v 4. ' '-A?v - 8»»a rase - /. - V v- V. 1 f ' K j. «. t &M 1»» 6 &3S Wi»r ', d3ssr> vc.^r ^n \ 'nbufr V. [ ' / V -v?; :; #; W0$ ' '- v- < -:;, y»'^gsfflimgges A Photograph 1: Existing shoreline trail that will be..±.:^ - " S reoved and replaced following placeent ^ of fill (trail will be installed slightly landward). -» - - V&A ai Ha / r ' a '. V T ft s -. V.?- ' Si ft & V i: '.»- - : $r %iag& «soi. iv r -- j i).->» % M & :. Mft P5 t. - $ J il ' J 3s i V p > H V V - ij V k t s \ t % "V Photograph 2: Existing shoreline trail that will be reoved and replaced following placeent of fill (trail will be installed slightly landward).

19 8 W i «I. & i. ~ ft 9^.-i MR & 38. K fc, -. :: a I H?tv j? K H WY taat.v 1«r 5S=7.-.v S SB5 4 si:, ft w > - Vi. IIMI Photograph 3: Existing shoreline trail that will be reoved and replaced following placeent of fill (trail will be installed slightly landward). 1 d - i V : < iv r - S A T ~ KB > p - s e 4K v-t -- Photograph 4. Existing shoreline trail that will be reoved and replaced following placeent of fill (trail will be installed slightly landward). K M ft

20 i DR! X WiT. $ f i. A 1 S3? I! r t -. ; V SfSS fc 30 1 ' - sr?z & > >T r % V - ft' I UK V N as»: kv ' s ; # stir,»4 H rautt i V & 3 Vf - f ' Sfe a El H A % < Hi - -. ses Lia: 5fl { I V < 4 a ; SR M r -. «rj sas. in 5.=.ijSSE ppis H : Photograph 5: Existing shoreline trail that will be reoved and replaced following placeent of fill (trail will be installed slightly landward). / ; p f y r- 4 X> :«- VI a aw 8» «>s 3fc SJ > re - >. < # KV# 7 r Tr -. " %i Sfe M n. r fc.. - i>. / Photograph 6: Existing shoreline trail that will be reoved and replaced following placeent of fill (trail will be installed slightly landward). n

21 . o -. X I w r k k I w v > PN >ie^ «>. ^ i ' : >,-,- f- w : ' W1 v- n. g fix - ' W '-. vftf'jfofc'' "A Photograph 7. Existing shoreline trail that will be reoved and replaced. r Sg&K > «>: : iws. - &, i : ««A ' a»5 v. ;Wk - IWV 4 - s x W?5 : a 1h. r.! -. % j i» i - I ; -T 4. X. «p» v/ ' M ft.v - ic f.. r LV ". v s«v. - 1 'N Photograph 8. Existing location of the proposed new shoreline access trail to provide access to boat launch.

22 3 i -5.1 V:.'- V I a T 1 VT > r> t - v> :»V -r - i._.«1 T>r - % & ' -' -.v^r Sfirws^ :.. MS irtfskff 2S 5a ISiKMli:!! V ss y: ass.3 : Photograph 9. Existing location of the proposed new shoreline access trail to provide access to restroo.. w