Feedback report. Employee effectiveness

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Feedback report. Employee effectiveness"

Transcription

1 Feedback report Employee effectiveness Organization report 7/13/2011

2

3 Table of contents About employee effectiveness 1 Survey response rates 2 Engagement and enablement results 3 Your employee effectiveness profile explained 5 Employee effectiveness profile 6 Employee effectiveness profile: by business unit 7 Employee effectiveness profile: by region 8 Employee effectiveness profile: by function 9 Employee effectiveness profile: by level 10 Employee effectiveness profile: by tenure 11 Dimensions summary - overall 12 Dimension summary by business unit 14 Dimension summary by region 15 Dimension summary by function 16 Dimension summary by level 17 Dimension summary by tenure 18 Most favorable survey questions 19 Most unfavorable survey questions 20 Survey results for all questions 22 Question summary by business unit 27 Question summary by region 30 Question summary by function 37 Question summary by level 40 Question summary by tenure 44 Survey framework details 48 About the Hay Group benchmarks Hay Group. All rights reserved i

4 About employee effectiveness Extensive research conducted by Hay Group confirms that when employees are both engaged and enabled they consistently deliver superior levels of performance - in short they become effective employees. The employee effectiveness survey measures proven 'key drivers' that predict how effective the employees in your organization actually are and provides insight into the actions leaders can take to improve performance at multiple levels. This report provides you with the opportunity to place employee feedback and dialogue at the heart of the successful execution of organizational plans and objectives. The business case for engagement and enablement Many traditional employee surveys focus solely on the outcome of creating engaged employees. However, Hay Group studies show that when high levels of employee engagement are combined with high levels of employee enablement organizations achieve significantly improved productivity, better customer satisfaction and superior financial returns. As an example, organizations with top quartile levels of engagement have revenue growth 2.5 times higher than those in the bottom quartile. However, organizations with top quartile engagement and enablement achieve 4.5 times greater revenue growth. Hay Group's employee effectiveness framework Hay Group's employee effectiveness survey comprises 14 discrete dimensions made up from the questions that were measured in this survey. As shown in the illustration, 12 of the dimensions are key drivers of the employee outcomes engagement and enablement. Of these 12 dimensions, six tend to drive engagement and the other six tend to drive enablement. The level of influence each driver has can vary within and across organizations. Key drivers of employee outcomes Clear and promising direction Quality and customer focus Confidence in leaders Respect and recognition Development opportunities Pay and benefits Employee outcomes Engagement (Commitment, Discretionary effort) Business outcomes Employee performance Drivers Employee effectiveness Customer satisfaction Performance management Authority and empowerment Resources Training Collaboration Work, structure and process Enablement (Optimized roles, Supportive environment) Financial success What is engagement? Engagement is the result organizations achieve when they stimulate employees' enthusiasm for their work and direct it toward organizational success. It includes: Commitment. Employees are proud to work for the organization, would recommend it as a place to work and express an intention to stay. Discretionary effort. Employees are willing to 'go the extra mile' to help the organization succeed. What is enablement? Employees are 'enabled' when jobs and work environments support them to channel their enthusiasm into productive action. Enablement includes: Optimized roles. Jobs make good use of skills and abilities and work is challenging and interesting. Supportive environments. The workplace is free from significant barriers to getting the job done and employees feel as productive as they can be Hay Group. All rights reserved 1

5 Survey response rates This employee effectiveness survey was administered between 7/13/2011 and 9/27/2011. The results for the overall engagement and enablement dimensions and component questions are shown below. Overall response rates The table below shows the response rate for data in this report. Survey period 7/13/2011-9/27/2011 No. of employees surveyed No. of respondents (100 %) Breakdown of responses by demographic The following tables show the response counts by demographic. Each response count is also represented as a percentage of the total number of employees who responded (shown in brackets). Note that the percentages are rounded to the nearest integer, so the sum of percentages will not always equal 100%. By business unit Responses Unit A 27 (73 %) Unit B 5 (14 %) Unit C 5 (14 %) By function (continued ) Responses Finance 3 (8 %) Marketing 3 (8 %) By level Responses Director 9 (24 %) AVP 8 (22 %) MD and above 7 (19 %) VP 7 (19 %) Staff 4 (11 %) Unspecified 2 (5 %) By tenure Responses 0-2 years 8 (22 %) 6-10 years 8 (22 %) 2-4 years 7 (19 %) 4-6 years 7 (19 %) 15+ years 5 (14 %) years 2 (5 %) By region Responses Region E 8 (22 %) Region A 7 (19 %) Region C 7 (19 %) Region B 5 (14 %) Unspecified 2 (5 %) Region D 2 (5 %) Region F 2 (5 %) Region G 2 (5 %) Region H 1 (3 %) Region I 1 (3 %) By function Responses IT 11 (30 %) HR 10 (27 %) Sales 10 (27 %) 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 2

6 Engagement and enablement results Results for the key dimensions of engagement and enablement within are shown below, together with scores for individual questions. These reveal how your employees feel about working for your organization and provide insight into levels of effectiveness. What to look for in the results Take time to review how results are distributed across the favorable, neutral and unfavorable survey response categories. A high percentage of employees responding unfavorably may be cause for concern, especially if more than 20% of the group is unfavorable. If a high percentage of employees have responded neutrally this may indicate that employees are experiencing a period of uncertainty or there is lack of clarity on a particular issue due to organizational changes. Using the benchmark Survey results can be difficult to interpret in isolation. To assist, an external benchmark is provided: the North America regional benchmark. The values in the external benchmark column show the differences in percentage favorable scores. A + symbol means the result is above the respective benchmark and a symbol means it is below. Engagement and enablement results Dimension/Question Percentage favorable External Benchmark Employee Engagement The organization motivates me to contribute more than is required I would recommend the organization to family or friends as a place to work I feel motivated to go beyond my formal job responsibilities I feel proud to work for the organization Given your choice, how long would you plan to continue working for the organization? * Employee Enablement There are no significant barriers at work to doing my job well My job provides me the opportunity to do challenging and interesting work My job makes good use of my skills and abilities Conditions in my job allow me to be about as productive as I can be * A favorable score for this question is > 5 years, and an unfavorable score is 2 years or less Favorable Neutral Unfavorable Difference in % favorable scores Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 3

7 Engagement and enablement results Making use of the results In which areas are the percentage of favorable responses highest? In which areas are the responses strong compared with the benchmark? (indicated by a positive difference score). In which areas do you need to find out more about employees experiences? (indicated by a high percentage of neutral responses) Which areas suggest priorities for action? (indicated by a high percentage of unfavorable responses) Which areas offer an opportunity to learn from other parts of or from other organizations (indicated by a high negative difference compared with the benchmarks) 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 4

8 Your employee effectiveness profile explained The employee effectiveness profile shows the level of engagement and enablement for your population and how they interrelate. Based on how they responded to the nine engagement and enablement questions, each respondent is categorized into one of the four groups shown below. The profile shows the extent to which employees are likely to be helped or hindered to perform at their best and provides a start point to understand what may be driving employee experiences. High Detached With high enablement but low engagement, employees show lower levels of commitment and effort despite supportive work environments. Most effective When employees are engaged and enabled, they feel productive and efficient, willing and able to perform at their best. Enablement Low Least effective Employees with low levels of both engagement and enablement are likely to perform well below their potential. Frustrated It is difficult to sustain high engagement when enablement is low. Over time, employees motivation will fade and at worst, they may leave. Low Engagement High Taking action to improve employee effectiveness The ideal state is to have as many employees as possible in the 'Most effective' group. Employees in the 'Frustrated' group are likely to be exposed to jobs and work environments that hinder their productivity. Action should focus on alleviating their frustrations. 'Detached' employees can only become fully effective if the root cause of their low engagement level is identified and addressed. Employees in the 'Least effective' group lack both engagement and enablement and therefore significant action will be needed to ensure they can achieve their full potential at work. What do frustrated employees do? They tend to behave in one of three ways: Break through the performance barrier. But by finding ways to overcome the obstacles they face, they risk burnout in the medium term Stop trying. They reduce their efforts to match their limited opportunities to succeed Leave. They go looking for places that will match their strong motivation with supportive working conditions The profile on the next page shows the experiences of employees within Hay Group. All rights reserved 5

9 Employee effectiveness profile Use your profile to review the proportion of employees within falling within each group and compare this to the benchmark data provided. A comparison is provided against both our General Industry benchmark and our High Performing organizations benchmark. Further information about Hay Group benchmarks is provided at the end of this report. Enablement Detached Most effective General industry benchmark High performing organizations benchmark Least effective Frustrated General industry benchmark High performing organizations benchmark Engagement Making use of the results First, compare the profile within with the benchmark profiles: Where in the profile are the areas of strength? Detached employees: To what do you attribute the responses of those employees who are detached? What is missing from their experiences that might generate greater motivation and engagement in their jobs? Least effective employees: To what do you attribute your least effective employees' responses? What more can you find out about these employees' perceptions? Where are the opportunities for improvement? Most effective employees: What might your most effective employees be experiencing that others represented in the profile are not? What can be learned from these employees and shared with other parts of? Frustrated employees: Most organizations, struggling to deliver more with less, can't afford to squander the energy that engaged but frustrated employees possess. To what do you attribute the responses of these frustrated employees? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 6

10 Employee effectiveness profile: by business unit The results below show the employee effectiveness profile by business unit. A comparison is provided against Hay Group's General Industry benchmark and High Performing organizations benchmark. Further information about Hay Group benchmarks is provided at the end of this report. Business unit Percentage of participants General industry benchmark High performing organizations benchmark Unit A Unit B Unit C Most effective Frustrated Detached Least effective Making use of the results Look at any areas with a high percentage of frustrated employees. These employees reported high levels of engagement but low levels of enablement. They feel energy, motivation and commitment towards their jobs, but are held back by organizational barriers or a lack of challenge. What circumstances or events might be contributing to a lack of enablement? Look at any areas where employees are at their most effective. These employees reported high levels of engagement and enablement. What circumstances or events might be contributing to the positive experiences of employees in these areas? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 7

11 Employee effectiveness profile: by region The results below show the employee effectiveness profile by region. A comparison is provided against Hay Group's General Industry benchmark and High Performing organizations benchmark. Further information about Hay Group benchmarks is provided at the end of this report. Region Percentage of participants General industry benchmark High performing organizations benchmark Unspecified Region D Region A Region B Region C Region E Region H 100 Region F 100 Region G 100 Region I Most effective Frustrated Detached Least effective Making use of the results Look at any areas with a high percentage of frustrated employees. These employees reported high levels of engagement but low levels of enablement. They feel energy, motivation and commitment towards their jobs, but are held back by organizational barriers or a lack of challenge. What circumstances or events might be contributing to a lack of enablement? Look at any areas where employees are at their most effective. These employees reported high levels of engagement and enablement. What circumstances or events might be contributing to the positive experiences of employees in these areas? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 8

12 Employee effectiveness profile: by function The results below show the employee effectiveness profile by function. A comparison is provided against Hay Group's General Industry benchmark and High Performing organizations benchmark. Further information about Hay Group benchmarks is provided at the end of this report. Function Percentage of participants General industry benchmark High performing organizations benchmark Marketing Finance Sales HR IT 9 91 Most effective Frustrated Detached Least effective Making use of the results Look at any areas with a high percentage of frustrated employees. These employees reported high levels of engagement but low levels of enablement. They feel energy, motivation and commitment towards their jobs, but are held back by organizational barriers or a lack of challenge. What circumstances or events might be contributing to a lack of enablement? Look at any areas where employees are at their most effective. These employees reported high levels of engagement and enablement. What circumstances or events might be contributing to the positive experiences of employees in these areas? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 9

13 Employee effectiveness profile: by level The results below show the employee effectiveness profile by level. A comparison is provided against Hay Group's General Industry benchmark and High Performing organizations benchmark. Further information about Hay Group benchmarks is provided at the end of this report. Level Percentage of participants General industry benchmark High performing organizations benchmark Unspecified VP Staff AVP MD and above Director Most effective Frustrated Detached Least effective Making use of the results Look at any areas with a high percentage of frustrated employees. These employees reported high levels of engagement but low levels of enablement. They feel energy, motivation and commitment towards their jobs, but are held back by organizational barriers or a lack of challenge. What circumstances or events might be contributing to a lack of enablement? Look at any areas where employees are at their most effective. These employees reported high levels of engagement and enablement. What circumstances or events might be contributing to the positive experiences of employees in these areas? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 10

14 Employee effectiveness profile: by tenure The results below show the employee effectiveness profile by tenure. A comparison is provided against Hay Group's General Industry benchmark and High Performing organizations benchmark. Further information about Hay Group benchmarks is provided at the end of this report. Tenure Percentage of participants General industry benchmark High performing organizations benchmark years years years years years years Most effective Frustrated Detached Least effective Making use of the results Look at any areas with a high percentage of frustrated employees. These employees reported high levels of engagement but low levels of enablement. They feel energy, motivation and commitment towards their jobs, but are held back by organizational barriers or a lack of challenge. What circumstances or events might be contributing to a lack of enablement? Look at any areas where employees are at their most effective. These employees reported high levels of engagement and enablement. What circumstances or events might be contributing to the positive experiences of employees in these areas? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 11

15 Dimensions summary - overall Below are the results for all survey dimensions for. This provides an overview of areas of strength and areas that need attention. What to look for in the results Take time to review how results are distributed across the favourable, neutral and unfavourable survey response categories. A high percentage of employees responding unfavorably may be cause for concern, especially if more than 20% of the group is unfavorable. If a high percentage of employees have responded neutrally this may indicate that employees are experiencing a period of uncertainty or there is lack of clarity on a particular issue due to organizational changes. Using the benchmark Survey results can be difficult to interpret in isolation. To assist, an external benchmark is provided: the North America regional benchmark. The values in the external benchmark column show the differences in percentage favorable scores. A + symbol means the result is above the respective benchmark and a symbol means it is below. Results for all dimensions Dimension Percentage favorable External Benchmark Employee Engagement Employee Enablement Clear & Promising Direction Confidence in Leaders Quality & Customer Focus Respect & Recognition Development Opportunities Pay & Benefits Performance Management Authority & Empowerment Resources Training Collaboration Work, Structure, & Process Favorable Neutral Unfavorable Difference in % favorable scores Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 12

16 Dimensions summary - overall Making use of the results In which areas are the percentage of favorable responses highest? In which areas are the responses strong compared with the benchmark? (indicated by a positive difference score). In which areas do you need to find out more about employees experiences? (indicated by a high percentage of neutral responses) Which areas suggest priorities for action? (indicated by a high percentage of unfavorable responses) Which areas offer an opportunity to learn from other parts of or from other organizations (indicated by a high negative difference compared with the benchmarks) 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 13

17 Dimension summary by business unit The table below shows the percentage of favorable responses for all dimensions of employee effectiveness, broken down by business unit. Color coding indicates both high and low scores, when compared against employees within. Dimension Percentage of favorable responses Business unit Unit A Unit B Unit C Employee Engagement Employee Enablement Clear & Promising Direction Confidence in Leaders Quality & Customer Focus Respect & Recognition Development Opportunities Pay & Benefits Performance Management Authority & Empowerment Resources Training Collaboration Work, Structure, & Process % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Making use of the results Use the color coding to identify any patterns in the data. Are particular business units scoring consistently higher than others (areas of green)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? Are particular business units scoring consistently lower than others (areas of red)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 14

18 Dimension summary by region The table below shows the percentage of favorable responses for all dimensions of employee effectiveness, broken down by region. Color coding indicates both high and low scores, when compared against employees within. Dimension Percentage of favorable responses Region Region A Region B Region C Region D Region E Region F Region G Region H Region I Unspecified Employee Engagement Employee Enablement Clear & Promising Direction Confidence in Leaders Quality & Customer Focus Respect & Recognition Development Opportunities Pay & Benefits Performance Management Authority & Empowerment Resources Training Collaboration Work, Structure, & Process % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Making use of the results Use the color coding to identify any patterns in the data. Are particular regions scoring consistently higher than others (areas of green)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? Are particular regions scoring consistently lower than others (areas of red)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 15

19 Dimension summary by function The table below shows the percentage of favorable responses for all dimensions of employee effectiveness, broken down by function. Color coding indicates both high and low scores, when compared against employees within. Dimension Percentage of favorable responses Function Finance HR IT Marketing Sales Employee Engagement Employee Enablement Clear & Promising Direction Confidence in Leaders Quality & Customer Focus Respect & Recognition Development Opportunities Pay & Benefits Performance Management Authority & Empowerment Resources Training Collaboration Work, Structure, & Process % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Making use of the results Use the color coding to identify any patterns in the data. Are particular business units scoring consistently higher than others (areas of green)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? Are particular business units scoring consistently lower than others (areas of red)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 16

20 Dimension summary by level The table below shows the percentage of favorable responses for all dimensions of employee effectiveness, broken down by level. Color coding indicates both high and low scores, when compared against employees within. Dimension Percentage of favorable responses Level AVP Director MD and above Staff Unspecified VP Employee Engagement Employee Enablement Clear & Promising Direction Confidence in Leaders Quality & Customer Focus Respect & Recognition Development Opportunities Pay & Benefits Performance Management Authority & Empowerment Resources Training Collaboration Work, Structure, & Process % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Making use of the results Use the color coding to identify any patterns in the data. Are particular levels scoring consistently higher than others (areas of green)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? Are particular levels scoring consistently lower than others (areas of red)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 17

21 Dimension summary by tenure The table below shows the percentage of favorable responses for all dimensions of employee effectiveness, broken down by tenure. Color coding indicates both high and low scores, when compared against employees within. Dimension Percentage of favorable responses Tenure 0-2 years years 15+ years 2-4 years 4-6 years 6-10 years Employee Engagement Employee Enablement Clear & Promising Direction Confidence in Leaders Quality & Customer Focus Respect & Recognition Development Opportunities Pay & Benefits Performance Management Authority & Empowerment Resources Training Collaboration Work, Structure, & Process % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Making use of the results Use the color coding to identify any patterns in the data. Are particular tenure groups scoring consistently higher than others (areas of green)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? Are particular tenure groups scoring consistently lower than others (areas of red)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 18

22 Most favorable survey questions The table below shows the ten survey questions that received the most favorable responses within. What to look for in the results The table shows the full distribution of responses favorable, unfavorable or neutral for each survey question. A high percentage of favorable responses indicates an area of strength. In reviewing your most favorable results refer back to the employee effectiveness framework and drivers of engagement and enablement shown on the 'About employee effectiveness' page. Think about the positive impact these drivers may be having on your results. Using the benchmark Survey results can be difficult to interpret in isolation. To assist, an external benchmark is provided: the North America regional benchmark. The values in the external benchmark column show the differences in percentage favorable scores. A + symbol means the result is above the respective benchmark and a symbol means it is below. Most favorable questions Dimension In order of percent favorable I have the resources I need to do my job effectively There are no significant barriers at work to doing my job well I have enough authority to carry out my job effectively Being innovative in how work is done (using new technologies or creative approaches to improve internal effectiveness) I have opportunities to have my ideas adopted and put into use The organization motivates me to contribute more than is required I have the information I need to do my job well The work is well organized in my team Your opportunities for learning and development Given your choice, how long would you plan to continue working for the organization? Making use of the results External Benchmark Resources Employee Enablement Authority & Empowerment Work, Structure, & Process Authority & Empowerment Employee Engagement Resources Work, Structure, & Process Development Opportunities Employee Engagement Favorable Neutral Unfavorable Difference in % favorable scores The best way to make sense of these results is to think about aspects of, or recent actions that may have resulted in favorable responses to these questions. What actions can you take, now and in the foreseeable future, to maintain these strengths? What actions can be taken to leverage these results in other parts of? What leadership actions can you personally take to consolidate and build on these strengths? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 19

23 Most unfavorable survey questions The table below shows the ten survey questions that received the most unfavorable responses within. What to look for in the results The table shows the full distribution of responses favorable, unfavorable or neutral for each survey question. A high percentage of unfavorable responses indicates an area that requires action. Again, in reviewing your most unfavorable results refer back to the employee effectiveness framework and drivers of engagement and enablement shown on the 'About employee effectiveness' page. Think about the negative impact these drivers may be having on your results. Using the benchmark Survey results can be difficult to interpret in isolation. To assist, an external benchmark is provided: the North America regional benchmark. The values in the external benchmark column show the differences in percentage favorable scores. A + symbol means the result is above the respective benchmark and a symbol means it is below. Most unfavorable questions Dimension In order of percent unfavorable Being effectively organized and structured Being customer focused (seeking to understand and meet its customers' needs and requirements) I receive clear and regular feedback on how well I do my work I would recommend the organization to family or friends as a place to work I feel proud to work for the organization My job provides me the opportunity to do challenging and interesting work The quality of customer support (i.e., responsiveness, flexibility, turnaround) provided by the organization My work group receives high quality support from other units on which we depend The organization provides training so that I can handle my present job well My job leaves adequate time to take advantage of job-related training opportunities Making use of the results Work, Structure, & Process Quality & Customer Focus Performance Management Employee Engagement Employee Engagement Employee Enablement Quality & Customer Focus External Benchmark Collaboration Training Training Favorable Neutral Unfavorable Difference in % favorable scores The best way to make sense of these results is to think about aspects of, or recent actions that may have resulted in unfavorable responses to these questions. In terms of the negative impact on employee effectiveness that they indicate, which of these questions are of greatest concern? Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 20

24 Most unfavorable survey questions What are the implications for, in terms of cost, lost productivity or poor quality outcomes? What actions can be taken to improve these results: - in the short term: what 'quick wins' can you achieve? - in the medium term: what can you do to change employees' experiences? - in the long term: how can you ensure improvements in employee effectiveness are durable? What leadership actions can you personally take to improve these results? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 21

25 Survey results for all questions This part of the report provides the detail that you may want to refer to when making sense of other findings. The tables below summarize the responses from within for all survey questions, organized by dimension. Using the benchmark Survey results can be difficult to interpret in isolation. To assist, an external benchmark is provided: the North America regional benchmark. The values in the external benchmark column show the differences in percentage favorable scores. A + symbol means the result is above the respective benchmark and a symbol means it is below. Employee Engagement In order of percent favorable External Benchmark The organization motivates me to contribute more than is required Given your choice, how long would you plan to continue working for the organization? I feel motivated to go beyond my formal job responsibilities I would recommend the organization to family or friends as a place to work I feel proud to work for the organization Employee Enablement In order of percent favorable External Benchmark There are no significant barriers at work to doing my job well Conditions in my job allow me to be about as productive as I can be My job makes good use of my skills and abilities My job provides me the opportunity to do challenging and interesting work Favorable Neutral Unfavorable Difference in % favorable scores Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 22

26 Survey results for all questions Clear & Promising Direction I believe that the organization's strategy and goals are the right ones for the organization at this time How do you rate the organization on its business prospects over the next 2-3 years? I have a good understanding of the organization's strategy and goals I understand the relationship between my job and the organization's strategy and goals In order of percent favorable External Benchmark Confidence in Leaders How would you rate the overall trust and confidence you have in the organization's senior management team? In order of percent favorable External Benchmark All in all, my organization is effectively managed and well-run How would you rate the organization on being open and honest in communications to employees? Quality & Customer Focus Being customer focused (seeking to understand and meet its customers' needs and requirements) The people in my team are committed to delivering high quality products and services The quality of the products and/or services produced by the organization? The quality of customer support (i.e., responsiveness, flexibility, turnaround) provided by the organization In order of percent favorable External Benchmark Favorable Neutral Unfavorable Difference in % favorable scores Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 23

27 Survey results for all questions Respect & Recognition In order of percent favorable External Benchmark The organization demonstrates care and concern for its employees I receive recognition when I do a good job The organization supports me in achieving a reasonable balance between my work life and my personal life I am treated with respect as an individual Development Opportunities In order of percent favorable External Benchmark Your opportunities for learning and development Your opportunities to achieve your personal career objectives at the organization My immediate manager coaches me in my development Pay & Benefits I believe my pay is fair considering the pay of people doing similar work in other companies In order of percent favorable External Benchmark I believe I am paid fairly for the work I do The organization provides employee benefits that meet my needs Favorable Neutral Unfavorable Difference in % favorable scores Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 24

28 Survey results for all questions Performance Management The organization expects a high level of performance from its employees In order of percent favorable External Benchmark I understand the results expected of me in my job The better my performance, the better my pay will be I receive clear and regular feedback on how well I do my work Authority & Empowerment In order of percent favorable External Benchmark I have enough authority to carry out my job effectively I have opportunities to have my ideas adopted and put into use I am encouraged to come up with new or better ways of doing things Resources In order of percent favorable External Benchmark I have the resources I need to do my job effectively I have the information I need to do my job well There are enough people to do the work in our area Training In order of percent favorable External Benchmark New employees receive the training they need to do their jobs well My job leaves adequate time to take advantage of job-related training opportunities The organization provides training so that I can handle my present job well Favorable Neutral Unfavorable Difference in % favorable scores Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 25

29 Survey results for all questions Collaboration In order of percent favorable External Benchmark There is good cooperation and teamwork within my work group My work group receives high quality support from other units on which we depend Cooperation and sharing of ideas and resources across the organization is encouraged Work, Structure, & Process Being innovative in how work is done (using new technologies or creative approaches to improve internal effectiveness) In order of percent favorable External Benchmark The work is well organized in my team Being effectively organized and structured Favorable Neutral Unfavorable Difference in % favorable scores 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 26

30 Question summary by business unit The table below shows the percentage of favorable responses for all employee effectiveness questions, broken down by business unit. Color coding is used to indicate both high and low scores, when compared against employees within. Dimension Employee Engagement Employee Enablement Clear & Promising Direction Confidence in Leaders Quality & Customer Focus Question The organization motivates me to contribute more than is required I would recommend the organization to family or friends as a place to work I feel motivated to go beyond my formal job responsibilities Percentage of favorable responses Business unit Unit A Unit B Unit C I feel proud to work for the organization Given your choice, how long would you plan to continue working for the organization? There are no significant barriers at work to doing my job well My job provides me the opportunity to do challenging and interesting work My job makes good use of my skills and abilities Conditions in my job allow me to be about as productive as I can be I believe that the organization's strategy and goals are the right ones for the organization at this time How do you rate the organization on its business prospects over the next 2-3 years? I understand the relationship between my job and the organization's strategy and goals I have a good understanding of the organization's strategy and goals All in all, my organization is effectively managed and wellrun How would you rate the overall trust and confidence you have in the organization's senior management team? How would you rate the organization on being open and honest in communications to employees? Being customer focused (seeking to understand and meet its customers' needs and requirements) The people in my team are committed to delivering high quality products and services The quality of customer support (i.e., responsiveness, flexibility, turnaround) provided by the organization The quality of the products and/or services produced by the organization? % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 27

31 Question summary by business unit Dimension Respect & Recognition Development Opportunities Question Percentage of favorable responses Business unit Unit A Unit B Unit C I receive recognition when I do a good job I am treated with respect as an individual The organization supports me in achieving a reasonable balance between my work life and my personal life The organization demonstrates care and concern for its employees Your opportunities to achieve your personal career objectives at the organization My immediate manager coaches me in my development Your opportunities for learning and development Pay & Benefits I believe I am paid fairly for the work I do Performance Management Authority & Empowerment I believe my pay is fair considering the pay of people doing similar work in other companies The organization provides employee benefits that meet my needs I receive clear and regular feedback on how well I do my work The organization expects a high level of performance from its employees I understand the results expected of me in my job The better my performance, the better my pay will be I have enough authority to carry out my job effectively I have opportunities to have my ideas adopted and put into use I am encouraged to come up with new or better ways of doing things Resources I have the resources I need to do my job effectively Training Collaboration There are enough people to do the work in our area I have the information I need to do my job well My job leaves adequate time to take advantage of jobrelated training opportunities The organization provides training so that I can handle my present job well New employees receive the training they need to do their jobs well My work group receives high quality support from other units on which we depend There is good cooperation and teamwork within my work group Cooperation and sharing of ideas and resources across the organization is encouraged % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 28

32 Question summary by business unit Dimension Work, Structure, & Process Question Being innovative in how work is done (using new technologies or creative approaches to improve internal effectiveness) Percentage of favorable responses Business unit Unit A Unit B Unit C The work is well organized in my team Being effectively organized and structured % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Making use of the results Use the color coding to identify any patterns in the data. Are particular business units scoring consistently higher than others (areas of green)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? Are particular business units scoring consistently lower than others (areas of red)? What circumstances or events might be contributing to this? 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 29

33 Question summary by region The table below shows the percentage of favorable responses for all employee effectiveness questions, broken down by region. Color coding is used to indicate both high and low scores, when compared against employees within. Dimension Employee Engagement Employee Enablement Clear & Promising Direction Question The organization motivates me to contribute more than is required I would recommend the organization to family or friends as a place to work I feel motivated to go beyond my formal job responsibilities Percentage of favorable responses Region Region A Region B Region C Region D Region E Region F Region G Region H I feel proud to work for the organization Given your choice, how long would you plan to continue working for the organization? There are no significant barriers at work to doing my job well My job provides me the opportunity to do challenging and interesting work My job makes good use of my skills and abilities Conditions in my job allow me to be about as productive as I can be I believe that the organization's strategy and goals are the right ones for the organization at this time How do you rate the organization on its business prospects over the next 2-3 years? I understand the relationship between my job and the organization's strategy and goals I have a good understanding of the organization's strategy and goals % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 30

34 Question summary by region Dimension Confidence in Leaders Quality & Customer Focus Respect & Recognition Development Opportunities Question All in all, my organization is effectively managed and well-run How would you rate the overall trust and confidence you have in the organization's senior management team? How would you rate the organization on being open and honest in communications to employees? Being customer focused (seeking to understand and meet its customers' needs and requirements) The people in my team are committed to delivering high quality products and services The quality of customer support (i.e., responsiveness, flexibility, turnaround) provided by the organization The quality of the products and/or services produced by the organization? Percentage of favorable responses Region Region A Region B Region C Region D Region E Region F Region G Region H I receive recognition when I do a good job I am treated with respect as an individual The organization supports me in achieving a reasonable balance between my work life and my personal life The organization demonstrates care and concern for its employees Your opportunities to achieve your personal career objectives at the organization My immediate manager coaches me in my development Your opportunities for learning and development % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 31

35 Question summary by region Dimension Question Percentage of favorable responses Region Region A Region B Region C Region D Region E Region F Region G Region H Pay & Benefits I believe I am paid fairly for the work I do Performance Management Authority & Empowermen t Resources Training I believe my pay is fair considering the pay of people doing similar work in other companies The organization provides employee benefits that meet my needs I receive clear and regular feedback on how well I do my work The organization expects a high level of performance from its employees I understand the results expected of me in my job The better my performance, the better my pay will be I have enough authority to carry out my job effectively I have opportunities to have my ideas adopted and put into use I am encouraged to come up with new or better ways of doing things I have the resources I need to do my job effectively There are enough people to do the work in our area I have the information I need to do my job well My job leaves adequate time to take advantage of job-related training opportunities The organization provides training so that I can handle my present job well New employees receive the training they need to do their jobs well % favorable score significantly higher than employees in. % favorable score significantly lower than employees in. Continued 2011 Hay Group. All rights reserved 32

Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey

Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey Coconino Community College Employee Opinion Survey Summary Report Fourth Annual Opinion Survey Conducted via telephone and online Spring 2003 Survey Background 57 Questions in the survey. Includes comment

More information

Results of the Employee Engagement Survey, October 2015

Results of the Employee Engagement Survey, October 2015 Results of the Employee Engagement Survey, Ocber 2015 Produced by People Insight in November 2015 Contents Page Introduction 2 Your Engagement Score 3 Engagement Themes 3 Tel: Email: Website: 0870 742

More information

Employee Engagement Leadership Workshop

Employee Engagement Leadership Workshop Employee Engagement Leadership Workshop Turning employee feedback into results Developed for: Presented by: Copyright 2010, DecisionWise, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,

More information

Caring and Continuous Learning. Building a Culture of Leadership Within Your Organization

Caring and Continuous Learning. Building a Culture of Leadership Within Your Organization Caring and Continuous Learning Building a Culture of Leadership Within Your Organization Agenda Briefly review the principles of leadership Make the case for the importance of employee engagement in achieving

More information

MEASURING ENGAGEMENT TO UNLOCK YOUR COMPANY S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

MEASURING ENGAGEMENT TO UNLOCK YOUR COMPANY S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE MEASURING ENGAGEMENT TO UNLOCK YOUR COMPANY S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE Employee engagement is the extent to which employees are motivated to contribute to organizational success and are willing to apply discretionary

More information

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT GUIDE

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT GUIDE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT GUIDE WHAT IS THE SURVEY OF EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT? The Survey of Employee Engagement facilitated by the UT Austin Institute for Organizational Excellence,

More information

Monument Credit Union Employee Opinion Survey. Employee Report. Presented by:

Monument Credit Union Employee Opinion Survey. Employee Report. Presented by: Monument Credit Union Employee Opinion Survey Employee Report Presented by: Survey Participation Demographics Survey Participants 94% Survey Non-Participants 6% Supervisory Status Breakdown Supervisors

More information

Journée Towers Watson à l intention des leaders RH

Journée Towers Watson à l intention des leaders RH Journée Towers Watson à l intention des leaders RH Vers un engagement durable (Towards Sustainable Engagement) par DAN P. MCCAULEY, Ph.D. Données, sondages et technologie / Sondages et perspectives d entreprises,

More information

Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF. Staff Results. January 2014

Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF. Staff Results. January 2014 Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF Staff Results January 2014 1 How to Understand Your Report This report presents survey results for your work group. The survey measures employees levels of engagement

More information

Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF. Faculty Results January 2014

Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF. Faculty Results January 2014 Summary of Results DESIGN, COLLEGE OF Faculty Results January 2014 1 How to Understand Your Report This report presents survey results for your work group. The survey measures employees levels of engagement

More information

TEAM MEMBER ENGAGEMENT

TEAM MEMBER ENGAGEMENT TEAM MEMBER ENGAGEMENT INCREASING ENGAGEMENT WORKSHOP TOPICS Definitions Models Table Discussions Measurement Strategies for increasing engagement Challenge: What will I do differently to increase engagement?

More information

Measures for success. Assessment of two E s engagement and enablement can give organizations powerful insights on inclusion beyond diversity.

Measures for success. Assessment of two E s engagement and enablement can give organizations powerful insights on inclusion beyond diversity. Measures for success Assessment of two E s engagement and enablement can give organizations powerful insights on inclusion beyond diversity. Companies for years measured the diversity of their workforce

More information

Report Employee Satisfaction Survey

Report Employee Satisfaction Survey Report Employee Satisfaction Survey Communication 1 In my company, there is open, honest communication. 2 My ideas and suggestions are heard and valued by upper management. 3 I receive adequate information

More information

Implementing an Employee Engagement Programme

Implementing an Employee Engagement Programme Implementing an Employee Engagement Programme A People & Culture White Paper Introduction Over the last decade, employers focus has moved away from employees who are satisfied with their working conditions,

More information

SampleCo Organization Survey Results

SampleCo Organization Survey Results SampleCo Organization Survey Results October 2009 Profile Report (This report was created on 5/30/2017) Table of Contents 1 Introduction: High Performance Organizations 2 Understanding the Data 3 Overall

More information

Best Places to Work for YOU Survey Results

Best Places to Work for YOU Survey Results Best Places to Work for YOU 2018 Survey Results 2 Establish a Foundation Today s Objectives Explore Engagement Pinpoint Opportunities Commit to Action 2017 Focus Areas Review 1 2 3 Emphasize Leader accountability

More information

Employee Engagement. Centre for Excellence in Organization

Employee Engagement. Centre for Excellence in Organization 1 Employee Engagement 2 DEFINING EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT The individual's involvement and satisfaction with as well as enthusiasm for work A result that is achieved by stimulating employees' enthusiasm for

More information

GUIDE TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

GUIDE TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT the essential GUIDE TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT Better business performance through staff satisfaction Sarah Cook KOGAN PAGE London and Philadelphia Contents Preface ix 1. What is employee engagement? 1 What

More information

Summary Category Scores vs. Benchmark UC OVERALL [W] (N=8,096) vs. TOWERS WATSON U.S. NATIONAL NORM (N=160,605)

Summary Category Scores vs. Benchmark UC OVERALL [W] (N=8,096) vs. TOWERS WATSON U.S. NATIONAL NORM (N=160,605) Summary Category Scores vs. Benchmark vs. TOWERS WATSON U.S. NATIONAL NORM (N=160,605) Categories Ranked By Difference Supervision Working Relationships Engagement Career Development Communication Performance

More information

Finance and Administration. Data Report

Finance and Administration. Data Report The Survey of Organizational Excellence Univ. North Texas Health Science Ctr. Fort Worth Finance and Administration Data Report 2007 ID: 763 Category: 103 Table of Contents Survey Results: Survey Respondent

More information

2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 2016 EMPLOYEE SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS JULY 2016 Survey Administered by the Institutional Effectiveness Committee March-June 2016 Report Prepared by the Office of Institutional Advancement Data Support

More information

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. Human Resources Overall

University of Kentucky 2017 Engagement Survey. Human Resources Overall 2017 Engagement Survey Definition of Terms 3WEEKS of survey administration September 6 th 27 th 99% Response rate 86% in 2015 121 responded to the survey 1 Comment Question Sustainable Engagement: 85%

More information

COACHING I 5. BUSINESS MANAGEMENT COACHING TIPS & STRATEGIES The Influence of the Human Resource Department

COACHING I 5. BUSINESS MANAGEMENT COACHING TIPS & STRATEGIES The Influence of the Human Resource Department COACHING I 5. BUSINESS MANAGEMENT COACHING TIPS & STRATEGIES 5.1. The Influence of the Human Resource Department "There is a great man who makes every man feel small. But the real great man is the man

More information

Getting Engaged - What is Employee Engagement and Why Does it Matter?

Getting Engaged - What is Employee Engagement and Why Does it Matter? Getting Engaged - What is Employee Engagement and Why Does it Matter? Employee engagement is critical for the success of any business. It is about having a workforce who wants to be there, who like what

More information

Compensation & Motivation. October 6, 2014

Compensation & Motivation. October 6, 2014 Compensation & Motivation October 6, 2014 Don MacPherson President & Co-Founder dmacpherson@modernsurvey.com 612-399-3837 Twitter: @macpherson_d Website: www.modernsurvey.com Blog: http://www.modernsurvey.com/author/don-macpherson

More information

CEB HR Employee Engagement. CARE (Dec 2014)

CEB HR Employee Engagement. CARE (Dec 2014) CARE (Dec 2014) Report Agenda 1. Engagement Capital Overview 2. Employee Engagement Executive Summary 3. Employee Engagement Deep-Dives 4. Survey Demographics 5. Appendix Engagement Capital Overview A

More information

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT. Administrative Office Circuit Court of Lake County, Illinois 2014 Court Employee Engagement Survey. Employee Growth & Development

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT. Administrative Office Circuit Court of Lake County, Illinois 2014 Court Employee Engagement Survey. Employee Growth & Development Administrative Office, Illinois 2014 Court Employee Engagement Survey Supportive Co-Workers Employee Growth & Development Trustworthy Leadership Continuous Organizational Improvement EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

More information

Employee engagement. Introduction. benchmark trends report. Our ETS benchmark

Employee engagement. Introduction. benchmark trends report. Our ETS benchmark Employee Introduction We re delighted to publish this employee. It s heartening that so many companies now run an employee survey. However, for lots of them, it can still be a challenge to demonstrate

More information

PERCEPTION IS REALITY

PERCEPTION IS REALITY PERCEPTION IS REALITY THE IMPORTANCE OF PAY TRANSPARENCY TO EMPLOYEES AND ORGANIZATIONS Rena Rasch, PhD Lena Bottos, CCP To us, business is personal WORKTRENDS TM REPORT Download your free copy from Kenexa.com

More information

August 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1

August 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1 August 4, 2010 Information Requests Round 1 CAC/MSOS (MPI) 1-50 Reference: 2009 Annual Report page 27. Preamble: In response to Goal 6, one of MPI s strategies is To continue to respond to the issues raised

More information

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government Introduction Bob Lavigna Director Institute for Public Sector Employee Engagement CPS HR Consulting 2 What We ll Cover 1. What is employee engagement

More information

UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey. Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services

UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey. Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey Prepared for: University of Alaska, Fairbanks Administrative Services July 2009 UAF Administrative Services Work Environment Survey Prepared for: University

More information

Jeffco Public Schools

Jeffco Public Schools Jeffco Public Schools 2016 Employee Survey Report of Results June 2016 Prepared by: 2955 Valmont Road, Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80531 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 Contents Executive Summary... 1 Survey Background...

More information

The end of executive incentives? Jarrod Moyle Director Strategic Pay

The end of executive incentives? Jarrod Moyle Director Strategic Pay The end of executive incentives? Jarrod Moyle Director Strategic Pay The End of Incentives? + Were large bonuses the cause of the GFC? + Have the rules changed so much that performance pay is no longer

More information

2017 Engagement Survey. Results Overview

2017 Engagement Survey. Results Overview UK@Work Engagement Survey Results Overview Survey Overview 3WEEKS of survey administration September 6 th 27 th 62% Response rate 48% in 2015 5,269 responded to the survey (Staff: 4,093 Faculty: 1,176)

More information

Human Resources and Organization Development. Interpreting Your Self-Assessment Workbook. August 06

Human Resources and Organization Development. Interpreting Your Self-Assessment Workbook. August 06 Human Resources and Organization Development Interpreting Your Self-Assessment Workbook August 06 Taking your Self-Assessment to the Next Level Now that you have completed the competency self-assessment

More information

An Organizational Analysis of Leadership Effectiveness and Development Needs

An Organizational Analysis of Leadership Effectiveness and Development Needs An Organizational Analysis of Leadership Effectiveness and Development Needs Prepared For ABC Company (Standard Survey) 23 June 2009 2009 Center for Creative Leadership. All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Engagement and Culture: Engaging Talent in Turbulent Times

Engagement and Culture: Engaging Talent in Turbulent Times Point of View Engagement and Culture: Engaging Talent in Turbulent Times When businesses confront an external environment characterized by challenge and confusion, why should they be interested in human

More information

Creating a Culture of Career Development to Increase Employee Engagement. TalentKeepers

Creating a Culture of Career Development to Increase Employee Engagement. TalentKeepers Creating a Culture of Career Development to Increase Employee Engagement TalentKeepers About TalentKeepers Leaders in award-winning and certified engagement and retention solutions Proven results in boosting

More information

How leaders create engaged performance and how to measure it

How leaders create engaged performance and how to measure it How leaders create engaged performance and how to measure it Capturing value in human resources 2008 conference, Stockholm, 21-22 October 2008 Georg Vielmetter Draft presentation including explanatory

More information

National NHS staff survey Brief summary of results from Dudley and Walsall Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust

National NHS staff survey Brief summary of results from Dudley and Walsall Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust National NHS staff survey 2009 Brief summary of results from Dudley and Walsall Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Table of Contents 1: Introduction to this report 3 2: Summary of 2009 Key Findings for

More information

building your career Reaching your potential

building your career Reaching your potential building your career Reaching your potential At Tesco we want you to build your career and reach your potential, in a way that works for you We want everyone to feel welcome and valued. We are proud to

More information

PARTNERS IN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

PARTNERS IN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PARTNERS IN PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT Copyright By Engaged2Perform, The Momentum Group Engagement Influencers & The Manager s Role Poll Questions 1. Is your organization currently focused on engagement improvement?

More information

BUILDING AN ENGAGED WORKFORCE

BUILDING AN ENGAGED WORKFORCE BUILDING AN ENGAGED WORKFORCE The Best Places to Work in the Federal Government rankings offer the most comprehensive assessment of how federal employees view their jobs and workplaces. The rankings and

More information

Werner Co. Performance Management Cycle and Compensation Guide

Werner Co. Performance Management Cycle and Compensation Guide Werner Co. Performance Management Cycle and Compensation Guide Summary: This document is intended to outline the Company s global performance management process. The performance management process intends

More information

Global Employee Engagement Survey MAY 2017 GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2017

Global Employee Engagement Survey MAY 2017 GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT SURVEY 2017 Global Employee Engagement Survey 2017 1 About the survey employee engagement survey supports our ongoing effort to be a Great place to work with a high performance culture. Because it all begins with

More information

The Enemy of Engagement

The Enemy of Engagement The Enemy of Engagement Put an end to workplace frustration and get the most from your employees October 2012 MARK ROYAL What does employee engagement mean to you? 2 How do you picture employee engagement?

More information

Employee Engagement Best Practices at NRC

Employee Engagement Best Practices at NRC Employee Engagement Best Practices at NRC August 5, 2015 ATD Webinar Jody L. Hudson Deputy Chief Human Capital Officer U.S. NRC Employee Engagement Engaged workers stand apart from their not-engaged and

More information

Executive Director Performance Review

Executive Director Performance Review Executive Director Performance Review Board Toolkit October 2012 The board s role in growing and developing the organization includes assessment of the Executive Director. The performance review process

More information

Enhancing performance through employee engagement the MacLeod Review

Enhancing performance through employee engagement the MacLeod Review Enhancing performance through employee engagement the MacLeod Review Presentation to the CIPD Scottish Conference, 12 March 2010 Nita Clarke, Director IPA Vice-chair of the Review The MacLeod Review A

More information

The ClimateQUAL : OCDA survey measures the following organizational climates:

The ClimateQUAL : OCDA survey measures the following organizational climates: The ClimateQUAL : OCDA survey measures the following organizational climates: ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE Organizational climate refers to the interpretative frameworks shared by employees regarding the priorities

More information

How to Retain Top Talent: Moving the Needle on Employee Engagement. Employee Insights

How to Retain Top Talent: Moving the Needle on Employee Engagement. Employee Insights How to Retain Top Talent: Moving the Needle on Employee Engagement Employee Insights How to Retain Top Talent Moving the Needle on Employee Engagement In the sea of relatively neutral economic news over

More information

2017 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust

2017 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 2017 National NHS staff survey Brief summary of results from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust Table of Contents 1: Introduction to this report 3 2: Overall indicator of staff engagement

More information

VITAL SIGNS. MEASURING the Drivers of Organizational Effectiveness

VITAL SIGNS. MEASURING the Drivers of Organizational Effectiveness VITAL SIGNS MEASURING the Drivers of Organizational Effectiveness BLUEGG 2015 70% of organizational change efforts fail - primarily due the people side. How do you develop the insight to stay in the 30%?

More information

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government

Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government Building a Culture of Employee Engagement in Government What We ll Cover 1. What is employee engagement and why does it matter? 2. Measuring engagement 3. Improving engagement 4. Creating an engagement

More information

HR Connect Asia Pacific

HR Connect Asia Pacific Best Employers Trends in Hong Kong - Journey to High Performance By Andy Leung, Senior Consultant, and Project Manager of Best Employers Study, Aon Hewitt, Hong Kong In the Best Employers 2.0 Hong Kong

More information

2017 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from London Ambulance Service NHS Trust

2017 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from London Ambulance Service NHS Trust 2017 National NHS staff survey Brief summary of results from London Ambulance Service NHS Trust Table of Contents 1: Introduction to this report 3 2: Overall indicator of staff engagement for London Ambulance

More information

Balancing Passion & Progress: how do we manage volunteers?

Balancing Passion & Progress: how do we manage volunteers? Balancing Passion & Progress: how do we manage volunteers? Dr Louise Parkes & Carly Adams NFP HR Forum Cerebral Palsy Alliance, 7 th August 2012 e: louise.parkes@voiceproject.com.au p: 0412 822 340 2 believe,

More information

The power of EI: The soft skills the sharpest leaders use. Comparisons across data from Korn Ferry Hay Group leadership and employee surveys

The power of EI: The soft skills the sharpest leaders use. Comparisons across data from Korn Ferry Hay Group leadership and employee surveys The power of EI: The soft skills the sharpest leaders use Comparisons across data from Korn Ferry Hay Group leadership and employee surveys What s emotional intelligence got to do with leadership? Organizations

More information

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust 2016 National NHS staff survey Brief summary of results from Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust Table of Contents 1: Introduction to this report 3 2: Overall indicator of staff engagement for

More information

Employee Engagement Survey Results

Employee Engagement Survey Results Employee Engagement Survey Results The results of the Employee Engagement Survey are back. Eighty-one per cent of employees responded to the survey a significant number that is well above the average,

More information

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust 2016 National NHS staff survey Brief summary of results from Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust Table of Contents 1: Introduction to this report 3 2: Overall indicator of staff engagement for Alder

More information

Respect Innovate Support Excel

Respect Innovate Support Excel SRUC Shared Values The work of every employee at SRUC contributes to the achievement of our strategic outcomes, it is therefore important that we all have a clear understanding of what our role is and

More information

LEADER. Develop remarkable leaders who deliver amazing results

LEADER. Develop remarkable leaders who deliver amazing results LEADER Develop remarkable leaders who deliver amazing results LEADER Develop remarkable leaders who deliver amazing results by Antoinette Oglethorpe the leader system 3 Here s the bottom line: companies

More information

2017 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Avon And Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust

2017 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Avon And Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust 2017 National NHS staff survey Brief summary of results from Avon And Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Table of Contents 1: Introduction to this report 3 2: Overall indicator of staff engagement

More information

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust 2016 National NHS staff survey Brief summary of results from Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust Table of Contents 1: Introduction to this report 3 2: Overall indicator of staff engagement

More information

The Advancing Women Organizational Assessment Feedback Results. WILOA Test Aggregate. May 2017

The Advancing Women Organizational Assessment Feedback Results. WILOA Test Aggregate. May 2017 The Advancing Women Organizational Assessment Feedback Results May 07 Report format Copyright 997-07 Assessment +, Inc. Introduction It is a well-known reality that, across the working world, women continue

More information

Exit Interviews. Who should do them?

Exit Interviews. Who should do them? Exit Interviews Why do them? The information from the interview is used to provide feedback on why employees are leaving, what they liked about their employment, and what areas of the organization need

More information

THE ROLE OF THE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR

THE ROLE OF THE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR ENHANCING EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF THE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR Dale Carnegie Training White Paper Copyright 2012 Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. Enhance_engagement_062513_wp_EMEA

More information

High Performing Workplace Index

High Performing Workplace Index High Performing Workplace Index S A M P L E B E N C H M A R K R E P O R T Company XYZ Monday, September 21, 2015 C o n f i d e n t i a l Table of Contents P A R T O N E... 1 High Performing Workplace Index...

More information

Calgary Police Commission. Annual Employee Engagement Survey Report

Calgary Police Commission. Annual Employee Engagement Survey Report Calgary Police Commission Annual Employee Engagement Survey Report 2017 DRAFT: CONTENTS NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 PERCEPTIONS OF SAFETY & SERVICE DELIVERY 8 CPS EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT 12

More information

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust

2016 National NHS staff survey. Brief summary of results from Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust 2016 National NHS staff survey Brief summary of results from Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust Table of Contents 1: Introduction to this report 3 2: Overall indicator of staff engagement for Leicestershire

More information

2014, GTC Consulting Services. All rights reserved. Training Workshops

2014, GTC Consulting Services. All rights reserved. Training Workshops Workshops Quick Wins 1. Detection of projects and activities, categorized on their relevance and positive impact in the immediate term (1 month), to achieve a particular goal. Example: to generate more

More information

Creating a Talent Development Culture in Government

Creating a Talent Development Culture in Government Creating a Talent Development Culture in Government October 11, 2018 Dr. Trish Holliday, SPHR, IPMA-HR Assistant Commissioner and State Chief Learning Officer Opening Activity Biggest Challenges in Retaining

More information

THE EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED

THE EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED THE 10 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT METRICS EXPLAINED Metric 1: PERSONAL GROWTH The Personal Growth Metric represents the level of autonomy employees have, whether or not they re improving their skills and if they

More information

Bolster Business Performance and Life Satisfaction with Virtual Vital Friends

Bolster Business Performance and Life Satisfaction with Virtual Vital Friends Bolster Business Performance and Life Satisfaction with Virtual Vital Friends A Special Report from Jocelyn S. Davis and Amanda C.E. Levy Founders of the Positive Workplace Alliance Bolster Business Performance

More information

EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY VOICE OF EMPLOYEE - ANALYSIS & RESULTS. SpiceJet Employee Satisfaction Survey

EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY VOICE OF EMPLOYEE - ANALYSIS & RESULTS. SpiceJet Employee Satisfaction Survey EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY VOICE OF EMPLOYEE - ANALYSIS & RESULTS SpiceJet Employee Satisfaction Survey Executive Summary 1 The main objective of conducting Employee Satisfaction Survey was to set a

More information

Your Voice 2015, BCLC s Employee Survey Comprehensive Report

Your Voice 2015, BCLC s Employee Survey Comprehensive Report Your Voice, BCLC s Employee Survey Comprehensive Report 1 Methodology was the seventh year of conducting Your Voice, the employee engagement survey for. All employees were invited to participate with the

More information

WHY DO EMPLOYEES LEAVE?

WHY DO EMPLOYEES LEAVE? TRENDICATORS SURVEY REPORT WHY DO EMPLOYEES LEAVE? Learn why employees seek employment elsewhere and what you can do to reduce voluntary turnover. The Current Retention Challenge 25 % of employees will

More information

Becoming Measurement Managed: Using Key-Driver Analysis To Understand Employee Satisfaction

Becoming Measurement Managed: Using Key-Driver Analysis To Understand Employee Satisfaction Becoming Measurement Managed: Using Key-Driver Analysis To Understand Employee Satisfaction By Jon Montgomery and Michael Lieberman Becoming a measurement-managed organization is a process which involves

More information

PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PROCESSES (Armstrong, M., 2012) Dr. Michael Ochurub

PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PROCESSES (Armstrong, M., 2012) Dr. Michael Ochurub PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PROCESSES (Armstrong, M., 2012) Dr. Michael Ochurub INTRODUCTION KEY COMPONENTS EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT MOTIVATION COMMITMENT CHANGE MANAGEMENT FLEXIBLE WORKING EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT It means

More information

Enhancing Employee Engagement: The Role of the Immediate

Enhancing Employee Engagement: The Role of the Immediate Enhancing Employee Engagement: The Role of the Immediate Supervisor Dale Carnegie Training White Paper Copyright 2012 Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. enhance_engagement_111312_wp

More information

Boldly Leading the Pack: The 100 Best Workplaces for Women

Boldly Leading the Pack: The 100 Best Workplaces for Women Webinars Boldly Leading the Pack: The 100 Best Workplaces for Women Presented by: Jessica Rohman & Tabitha Russell Please type any questions into the Questions Panel Today s Presenters Jessica Rohman Director

More information

HIGHLIGHT OF THE UC SAN DIEGO 2015 STAFF ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

HIGHLIGHT OF THE UC SAN DIEGO 2015 STAFF ENGAGEMENT SURVEY HIGHLIGHT OF THE UC SAN DIEGO 2015 STAFF ENGAGEMENT SURVEY AGENDA CUCSA Staff Engagement Survey Background IS Engagement Important? 2012 Staff Engagement Survey Outcomes 2015 Staff Engagement Survey Results

More information

integrity. It is vital to be careful and take people seriously during difficult conversations.

integrity. It is vital to be careful and take people seriously during difficult conversations. 8 FIRM LEADERSHIP Creating understanding and acceptance. Fear and insecurity spread in times of uncertainty, when organisational change generates a sense of loss. In conjunction with organisational changes,

More information

in partnership with EMPLOYEE OUTLOOK EMPLOYEE VIEWS ON WORKING LIFE

in partnership with EMPLOYEE OUTLOOK EMPLOYEE VIEWS ON WORKING LIFE in partnership with EMPLOYEE OUTLOOK EMPLOYEE VIEWS ON WORKING LIFE 2015 The CIPD is the professional body for HR and people development. The not-for-profit organisation champions better work and working

More information

Info-Tech Research Group

Info-Tech Research Group Info-Tech Research Group McLean & Company is a research and advisory firm providing practical solution to human resources challenges via executable research tools and advice that have a clear and measurable

More information

9-1. Managing Leadership. Essentials of Contemporary Management, 3Ce. Copyright 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

9-1. Managing Leadership. Essentials of Contemporary Management, 3Ce. Copyright 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved 9 9-1 Managing Leadership Learning Objectives 9-2 1. Describe what leadership is and on what bases of power leaders influence others. 2. Describe the early trait and behavioural theories of leadership

More information

Intro to Organizational Behavior and Culture

Intro to Organizational Behavior and Culture Intro to Organizational Behavior and Culture 1.1 Introduction to Organizational Behaviors and Culture 1.2 Organizational Behavior Definition of Organizational Behavior: Organizational Behavior is the study

More information

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY Customer Service Centre March 31, 2015 on behalf of TTC TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3 Overall Engagement Score 14 Aspects of Employee Engagement 18 What Drives Engagement

More information

Assessment and recommendations for effective HR service delivery model implementation for organizations

Assessment and recommendations for effective HR service delivery model implementation for organizations Assessment and recommendations for effective HR service delivery model implementation for organizations Business Joanna J. Harrop Joanna J. Harrop M.B.A., M.A. Cass Business School, United Arab Emirates

More information

Profile Comparison Top-Leader

Profile Comparison Top-Leader Limbic Personality GmbH Profile Comparison Top-Leader Peter Mustermann Presented by The Limbic Personality Profile Comparison for Top Leaders There are a lot of leaders in the market but only those with

More information

Employee Engagement in

Employee Engagement in Employee Engagement in Tough Times The Impact of HR and Training Departments and employee s perceptions of fairness March 09, 2010 Hay Group research has shown that an employee s perception p of fairness

More information

A Study of the Employee Engagement Practices in the Indian Manufacturing Sector

A Study of the Employee Engagement Practices in the Indian Manufacturing Sector A Study of the Employee Engagement Practices in the Indian Manufacturing Sector 1 Dr Shilpa Varma, 2 Ms PriyaVij, 3 Dr R Gopal 1 Associate Professor DY Patil University School of Management 2 Assistant

More information

50 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT. IDEAS and TIPS A LEADER S GUIDE TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

50 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT. IDEAS and TIPS A LEADER S GUIDE TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT 50 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT IDEAS and TIPS A LEADER S GUIDE TO EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT ! 50 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT IDEAS and TIPS: 50 EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT IDEAS AND TIPS 1 2 3 4 5 BE A BETTER BOSS! Immediate manager

More information

Prepared for: Joe Sample 2/2/15

Prepared for: Joe Sample 2/2/15 Leadership Potential Inventory Report Prepared for: Joe Sample 2/2/ Introduction Your Leadership Potential Inventory Report collects feedback about your behavior and performance from you and your supervisor.

More information

Performance Management. Leadership Roundtable May 14, 2008

Performance Management. Leadership Roundtable May 14, 2008 Performance Management Leadership Roundtable May 14, 2008 Today s Presentation: The Performance Management Approach Guidelines and Resources for Performance Evaluations Performance Management Defined:

More information

GALLUP S PERSPECTIVE ON. Designing Your Organization s Employee Experience

GALLUP S PERSPECTIVE ON. Designing Your Organization s Employee Experience GALLUP S PERSPECTIVE ON Designing Your Organization s Employee Experience COPYRIGHT STANDARDS This document contains proprietary research, copyrighted and trademarked materials of Gallup, Inc. Accordingly,

More information

GDC staff survey 2015

GDC staff survey 2015 Item # Item 16 Council 3 March 2016 GDC staff survey 2015 Purpose of paper Action Corporate Strategy 2016-19 Business Plan 2016 Decision Trail Recommendations Authorship of paper and further information

More information

2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey. San Diego

2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey. San Diego 2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey How to Read Results Scores Scores shown are the total Percent (typically the top two options). For example: Agree Tend to Agree? Tend to Disagree Disagree Differences and

More information