RETTEW Associates, Inc. QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN. for. (client project/rfp number) (date of proposal submission)
|
|
- Laura Welch
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RETTEW Associates, Inc. QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN for (client project/rfp number) (date of proposal submission) Enclosure 1 This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, a contract is awarded to this offeror as a result of or in connection with the submission of this data, the government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the government s right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction.
2 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT APPROACH PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY GOVERNMENT RESOURCES THE CONTRACTING OFFICER THE CONTRACTING OFFICER S TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE TECHNICAL ASSISTANT COMPETENCY TECHNICAL AUTHORITY ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES THE CONTRACTING OFFICER THE CONTRACTING OFFICER S TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE TECHNICAL ASSISTANT COMPETENCY TECHNICAL AUTHORITY METHODOLOGIES TO MONITOR PERFORMANCE SURVEILLANCE TECHNIQUES CUSTOMER FEEDBACK ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVELS QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FEEDBACK LOOP MONITORING FORM ANALYSIS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENT DETERMINING PERFORMANCE REPORTING REVIEWS AND RESOLUTION ENCLOSURES... 9 ENCLOSURE 1: SERVICE SUPPORT FOR PERFORMANCE STANDARDS... * ENCLOSURE 2: DATA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS... * ENCLOSURE 3: INCENTIVES... * ENCLOSURE 4: SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITY CHECKLIST... * ENCLOSURE 5: QASP QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORING FORM... * 2
3 1.0 Introduction This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is pursuant to the requirements listed in the Statement of Work (SOW) entitled ( Client Program Support Services here). This plan sets forth the procedures and guidelines that RETTEW Associates, Inc., ( RETTEW ) will use in ensuring the required performance standards or services levels are achieved by the contractor. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of the QASP is to describe the systematic methods used to monitor performance and to identify the required documentation and the resources to be employed. The QASP provides a means for evaluating whether the Contractor is meeting the performance standards/quality levels identified in the SOW and the Contractor s Quality Management Plan (QMP), and to ensure that the government pays only for the level of services received. This QASP defines the roles and responsibilities of all members of the Integrated Project Team (IPT), identifies the performance objectives, defines the methodologies used to monitor and evaluate the contractor s performance, describes quality assurance documentation requirements, and describes the analysis of quality assurance monitoring results. 1.2 Performance Management Approach The SOW structures the acquisition around what service or quality level is required, as opposed to how the contractor should perform the work (i.e., results, not compliance). This QASP will define the performance management approach taken by the (client) to monitor and manage the contractor s performance to ensure the expected outcomes or performance objectives communicated in the SOW are achieved. Performance management rests on developing a capability to review and analyze information generated through performance assessment. The ability to make decisions based on the analysis of performance data is the cornerstone of performance management; this analysis yields information that indicates whether expected outcomes for the project are being achieved by the contractor. Performance management represents a significant shift from the more traditional Quality Assurance (QA) concepts in several ways. Performance management focuses on assessing whether outcomes are being achieved and to what extent. This approach migrates away from scrutiny of compliance with the processes and practices used to achieve the outcome. A performance-based approach enables the Contractor to play a large role in how the work is performed, as long as the proposed processes are within the stated constraints. The only exceptions to process reviews are those required by law (federal, state, and local) and compelling business situations, such as safety and health. A results focus provides the Contractor flexibility to continuously improve and innovate over the course of the contract as long as the critical outcomes expected are being achieved and/or the desired performance levels are being met. 3
4 1.3 Performance Management Strategy The contractor is responsible for the quality of all work performed. The contractor measures that quality through the contractor s own Quality Control Plan (QCP). Quality control is work output, not workers, and therefore includes all work performed under this contract/delivery order regardless of whether the work is performed by contractor employees or by subcontractors. The contractor s QCP will set forth the staffing and procedures for self-inspecting the quality, timeliness, responsiveness, customer satisfaction, and other performance requirements in the PWS. The contractor will develop and implement a performance management system with processes to assess and report its performance to the designated government representative. This QASP enables the government to take advantage of the contractor s QCP The government representative(s) will assess performance using Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) to determine how the contractor is performing against communicated performance objectives. The CPAR assesses a contractor s performance, both positive and negative, and provides a record on a given contract during a specified period of time. More information pertaining to CPARS can be found at: Each assessment will be based on objective data (or measurable, subjective data when objective data is not available) supportable by program and contract management data. CPAR performance expectations will be addressed in the Government and contractor s initial post-award meeting. Potential sources of data may include, but are not limited to, the following: Contractor operations reviews Status and progress reviews Production and management reviews Management and engineering process reviews (e.g. risk management, requirements management, etc.) Cost performance reports and other cost and schedule metrics Other program measures and metrics such as: Measures of progress and status of critical resources Measures of product size and stability Measures of product quality and process performance Customer feedback/comments and satisfaction ratings Systems engineering and other technical progress reviews Technical interchange meetings Physical and functional configuration audits Quality reviews and quality assurance evaluations Functional performance evaluations Subcontract Reports 4
5 2.0 Government Resources 2.1 The Contracting Officer (CO) A person duly appointed with the authority to enter into contracts and make related determination and findings on behalf of the Government. The CO for this contract is (Name, Code). The CO will be designated in the resulting contract. Cos are designated via a written warrant which sets forth limitations of authority. 2.2 The Contracting Officer s Technical Representative (COTR) A person duly designated to be the CO s authorized representative to assist in administering the contract. The COTR will be designated in the resulting contract and individual task orders. The limitations of authority are contained in a written letter of designation. 2.3 Technical An individual designated in writing by the COTR authorized to monitor and review contractor compliance with individual task order requirements. The limitations of authority are contained in a written letter of designation. 2.4 Competency Technical Authority (CTA) An individual designated by the Competency Manager responsible to establish, monitor, and approve technical standards, tools, and processes in conformance with higher authority policy requirements, architectures and standards. 3.0 Roles and Responsibilities 3.1 The Contracting Officer (CO) The Contracting Officer ensures performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. It is the Contracting Officer that assures the Contractor receives impartial, fair and equitable treatment under the contract. The Contracting Officer is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor s performance. 3.2 The Contracting Officer s Technical Representative (COTR) The COTR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and assures proper Government surveillance of the contractor s performance. The COTR is not 5
6 empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any changes on the Government s behalf. Any changes that the contractor deems may affect contract price, terms or conditions shall be referred to the Contracting Officer for action. 3.3 Technical The TA is responsible for the technical review and contract compliance by the contractor to individual task orders. The TA is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any changes on the Government s behalf. Any changes that the contractor deems may affect contract price, terms or conditions shall be referred to the Contracting Officer for action. 3.4 Competency Technical Authority (CTA) The CTA is responsible to ensure that the execution of competency technical standards, tools, and processes adheres to standards and policy that provide a range of technically acceptable alternatives with risk and value assessments. Additionally, the CTA will be responsible for the following: definition of Contract tasks and subtasks, review of requested delivery order work orders, and sourcing concurrence for delivery orders; responsible for key position resume qualification review/approval; and identification by specific contract task and assigned to a Level 3 OBS, as approved by the Level 2 Department Director. 4.0 Methodologies to Monitor Performance 4.1 Surveillance Techniques In an effort to minimize the performance management burden, simplified surveillance methods shall be used by the government to evaluate Contractor performance when appropriate. The primary methods of surveillance are: Random monitoring, which shall be performed by the COTR designated inspector. 100% Inspection Each month, the COTR, shall review the generated documentation and enter summary results into the QS Monitoring Form. Periodic Inspection COTR typically performs the periodic inspection on a monthly basis. 4.2 Customer Feedback The Contractor is expected to establish and maintain professional communication between its employees and customers. The primary objective of this communication is customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction is the most significant external 6
7 indicator of the success and effectiveness of all services provided and can be measured through customer complaints. Performance management drives the Contractor to be customer focused through initially and internally addressing customer complaints and investigating the issues and/or problems but the customer always has the option to communicate complaints to the COTR, as opposed to the Contractor. Customer complaints, to be considered valid, must set forth clearly and in writing the detailed nature of the complaint, must be signed, and must be forwarded to the COTR. The COTR will accept those customer complaints and investigate using the Quality Assurance Monitoring Form Customer Complaint, identified in Attachment 4B. Customer feedback may also be obtained either from the results of formal customer satisfaction surveys or from random customer complaints. 4.3 Acceptable Quality Levels The Acceptable Quality Levels (AQLs) included in Attachment 4A, Performance Requirements Summary Table, for Contractor performance are structured to allow the Contractor to manage how the work is performed while providing negative incentives for performance shortfalls. For certain critical activities such as those involving Program, Identity, and PACS Management, the desired performance level is 100 percent, however the AQL is five error or less for each deliverable in the QASP requirements summary based on the required services (tasks/deliverables). 5.0 Quality Assurance Documentation 5.1 The Performance Management Feedback Loop The performance management feedback loop begins with the communication of expected outcomes. Performance standards are expressed in the SOW and is assessed using the performance monitoring techniques shown in Attachment 4A. 5.2 Monitoring Form The government s QA surveillance, performed by the COTR, will be reported using the monitoring form in Enclosure (5). The form, when completed, will document the government s assessment of the Contractor s performance under the contract to ensure that the required results are being achieved. The COTR will retain a copy of all completed QA surveillance forms. 7
8 6.0 Analysis of Quality Assurance Assessment 6.1 Determining Performance The Government shall use the monitoring methods cited to determine whether the performance standards/service levels/aqls have been met. If the contractor has not met the minimum requirements, it may be asked to develop a corrective action plan to show how and by what date it intends to bring performance up to the required levels. 6.2 Reporting At the end of each month, the COTR will prepare a written report summarizing the overall results of the quality assurance surveillance of the Contractor s performance. This written report, which includes the Contractor s submitted monthly report and the completed quality assurance monitoring form (Attachment 4B), will become part of the QA documentation. It will enable the government to demonstrate whether the Contractor is meeting the stated objectives and/or performance standards, including cost/technical/scheduling objectives. 6.3 Reviews and Resolution The COTR may require the Contractor s project manager, or a designated alternate, to meet with the CO and other government IPT personnel as deemed necessary to discuss performance evaluation. The COTR will define a frequency of in-depth reviews with the Contractor, including appropriate self-assessments by the Contractor; however, if the need arises, the Contractor will meet with the COTR as often as required or per the Contractor s request. The agenda of the reviews may include: Monthly performance assessment data and trend analysis Issues and concerns of both parties Projected outlook for upcoming months and progress against expected trends, including a corrective action plan analysis Recommendations for improved efficiency and/or effectiveness Issues arising from the performance monitoring processes 8
9 7.0 Enclosures Enclosure (1) - Service Support For Performance Standards Enclosure (2) - Data Performance Standards Enclosure (3) - Incentives Enclosure (4) - Surveillance Activity Checklist Enclosure (5) QASP Quality Assurance Monitoring Form 9
10 SERVICE SUPPORT FOR PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Description (For Each SOW Element) Performance Standard and Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Surveillance Method/Measure Incentives Provide Program Planning, Analysis, and Assessments 90% acceptable on first 100% acceptable on subsequent submission to Government Technical Report (Study/Service(s)) Reviewed by Program Technical See enclosure 3. Provide Conference and Program Definition 90% acceptable on first 100% acceptable on subsequent submission to Government Technical Report (Study/Service(s)) Reviewed by Program Technical See enclosure 3 Provide Quantitative Resource Analysis 90% acceptable on first 100% acceptable on subsequent Technical Report (Study/Services(s)) Received by Program Technical See enclosure 3 Provide Program Execution Evaluation 90% acceptable on first 100% acceptable on subsequent Technical Report (Study/Services(s)) Received by Program Technical See enclosure 3 Provide Training Program Development and Management 90% acceptable on first 100% acceptable on subsequent Technical Report (Study/Services(s)) Received by Program Technical See enclosure 3 Provide (additional as SOW directed) 90% acceptable on first 100% acceptable on subsequent Technical Report (Study/Services(s)) Received by Program Technical See enclosure 3 Enclosure 1
11 DATA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Description Standard AQL Surveillance Measure Incentives Contractor s Progress, Status Report Submission is in accordance with the Data Item Description (DID) cited in the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) 95% acceptable on first submission to Government 100% acceptable on subsequent submission to Government 100% Inspection by Program Technical See enclosure 3 Technical Report (Status/Services(s)) Submission is in accordance with the Data Item Description (DID) cited in the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) 95% acceptable on first submission to Government 100% acceptable on subsequent submission to Government 100% Inspection by Program Technical See enclosure 3 Funds and Manpower Expenditure Report Submission is in accordance with the Data Item Description (DID) cited in the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) 95% acceptable on first submission to Government 100% acceptable on subsequent submission to Government 100% Inspection by Program Technical See enclosure 3 Enclosure 2
12 INCENTIVES Assessment Period Acceptable Performance Definition How Measured Incentives Evaluation Period 1 All measurement areas rated Satisfactory. See below Midpoint of the assessment period (6 month) evaluation using the CPARs format covering the previous 6 months (+) award of future orders.* (-) Not awarded future orders unless there is remediation with Contracting Officer s Representative (COTR)* Evaluation Period 2 All measurement areas rated Satisfactory. See below. Midpoint of the assessment period (18 month) evaluation using the CPARs format covering the previous 12 months. (+) award of future orders.* (-) Not awarded future orders unless there is remediation with Contracting Officer s Representative (COTR)* Evaluation Period 3 All measurement areas rated at least Satisfactory. Three or more measurements rated either Very Good or Exceptional. See below. Midpoint of the assessment period (30 month) evaluation using the CPARs format covering the previous 12 months. (+) award of future orders.* (-) Not awarded future orders unless there is remediation with Contracting Officer s Representative (COTR)* Evaluation Period 4 All measurement areas rated at least Satisfactory. Three or more measurements rated either Very Good or Exceptional. See below. Midpoint of the assessment period (42 month) evaluation using the CPARs format covering the previous 12 months. (+) award of future orders.* (-) Not awarded future orders unless there is remediation with Contracting Officer s Representative (COTR)* Evaluation Period 5 All measurement areas rated at least Satisfactory. Three or more measurements rated either Very Good or Exceptional. See below. Midpoint of the assessment period (54 month) evaluation using the CPARs format covering the previous 12 months. (+) award of future orders.* (-) Not awarded future orders unless there is remediation with Contracting Officer s Representative (COTR)* Enclosure 3
13 * The Government will not award orders unless all regulatory requirements are met and the contractor meets the acceptable performance definition. All SOW/CDRL tasks, including SOW/CDRL sub-tasks, will be assessed focusing on the following. Quality of Product or Service Assess the contractor s effort to transform operational needs and requirements into an integrated solution. Areas of focus may include the planning and management of program tasks, the quality of support provided throughout all phases of contract execution, the integration of program management specialties, management of interfaces, and the management of a totally integrated effort of all program management concerns to meet cost, performance, and schedule objectives. Assess how successfully the contractor meets program quality. Schedule Assess the contractor s adherence to the required delivery schedule by assessing the contractor s efforts during the assessment period that contribute to or effect the schedule variance. Also address significance of scheduled events (i.e., design reviews), discuss causes, and assess the effectiveness of contractor corrective actions. Cost Control Assess the contractor s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost. Is the contractor experiencing cost growth or underrun? If so, discuss the causes and contractorproposed solutions for the cost overruns. For contracts where task or contract sizing is based upon contractor provided person-hour estimates, the relationship of these estimates to ultimate cost should be assessed. In addition, the extent to which the contractor demonstrates a sense of cost responsibility, through the efficient use of resources in each work effort should be assessed. Business Relations Assess the timelines, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor s reasonable and cooperative behavior, effective business relations, and customer satisfaction. Management Assess the contractor s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met small/small disadvantage and women-owned business participation goals. Discuss the extent to which the contractor discharges its responsibility for integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract; identifies and applies resources required to meet schedule requirements; assigns responsibility for tasks/actions required by contract; communicates appropriate information to affected program elements in a timely manner. Assess the contractor s risk mitigation plans. If applicable, identify any other management areas that are unique to the contract. Other areas Assess additional evaluation areas unique to the contract or that cannot be captured elsewhere. The evaluation ratings are as follows: Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government s benefit. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government s benefit. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task contain some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. Enclosure 3
14 Marginal - Performance does not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the task and sub-task being assessed reflect a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the task or sub-task contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor s actions appear or were ineffective. Enclosure 3
15 SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITY CHECKLIST Description Surveillance Method/Measure Date Planned Date Completed Quality Schedule Cost Control Business Relation Mgmt. Other Customer and Provide Program Planning, Analysis, and Assessments Government subject matter experts, quarterly feedback TBD Customer and Provide Conference and Program Definition Government subject matter experts, quarterly feedback TBD Customer and Provide Quantitative Resource Analysis Government subject matter experts, quarterly feedback TBD Provide Program Execution Evaluation Customer and Government subject matter experts, quarterly feedback TBD Provide Training Program Development and Management Customer and Government subject matter experts, quarterly feedback TBD Provide (additional as directed by SOW) Customer and Government subject matter experts, quarterly feedback TBD Enclosure 4
16 QASP QUALITY ASSURANCE MONITORING FORM REQUIRED TASKS/SERVICES: SURVEY PERIOD: SURVEILLANCE METHOD (Check): LEVEL OF SURVEILLANCE (Check): ANALYSIS OF RESULTS: Documented Performance Measurement Rate (# of errors): (AQL = 5 or fewer errors) Reviewer s Performance Assessment (Check): Narrative of Performance During Survey Period: PREPARED BY: DATE: Enclosure 5
FINAL Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
FINAL Quality Assurance DERP-FUDS Project No. I04SC001603 Contract No.:W912DY-10-D0025 Delivery Order No.: 0012 PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntsville Center U.S. Army Engineering and Support
More informationTHE COMMANDER NAVY REGION, SOUTHWEST (CNRSW) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (HAZMAT) OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP) 20 June 2000
THE COMMANDER NAVY REGION, SOUTHWEST (CNRSW) HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (HAZMAT) OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP) 20 June 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PURPOSE... 1 2.0 OVERVIEW.2
More informationSpace and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) / Contracting Officer Representative (COR) Updates CDCA Small Business and Industry Outreach Initiative
More informationGeneral Services Administration
General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule Government-Wide Blanket Purchase Agreement for Performance Management/Continuous Process Improvement Services Period of Performance: 6/24/2013 +
More informationManagement/Administration of a Performance Based Contract
Management/Administration of a Performance Based Contract Management/Administration of a Performance Based Contract Susan Thibodeaux Asst General Manager/Contract Administration Manager IAP Worldwide Services
More informationThe PM's Role in Capturing, Bidding, and Winning Performance-Based Contracts
The PM's Role in Capturing, Bidding, and Winning Performance-Based Contracts P R E S E N T E D BY: D R. J O H N G. P I C A R E L L I, P R E S I D E N T B U S I N E S S D E V E LO P M E N T A S S O C I
More informationPART THREE: Work Plan and IV&V Methodology (RFP 5.3.3)
PART THREE: Work Plan and IV&V Methodology (RFP 5.3.3) 3.1 IV&V Methodology and Work Plan 3.1.1 NTT DATA IV&V Framework We believe that successful IV&V is more than just verification that the processes
More informationLESSON 6 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
LESSON 6 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) CHRISTINE MORRIS QUALITY ASSURANCE SPECIALIST PHONE: 757 501 8181 1 Agenda Agile Proficient Trusted Training Benefits QASP Regulatory Guidance What Type
More informationAssociation of American Railroads Quality Assurance System Evaluation (QASE) Checklist Rev. 1/12/2017
Company: Prepared By: Date: Changes from previous version highlighted in yellow. Paragraph Element Objective Evidence 2.1 Objective of Quality Assurance Program 2.2 Applicability and Scope 2.3 QA Program
More informationWORK PLAN AND IV&V METHODOLOGY Information Technology - Independent Verification and Validation RFP No IVV-B
1. Work Plan & IV&V Methodology 1.1 Compass Solutions IV&V Approach The Compass Solutions Independent Verification and Validation approach is based on the Enterprise Performance Life Cycle (EPLC) framework
More informationPHASE 4 - Post-Award. Type of Feedback Type of Contract Feedback Category Feedback
PHASE 4 - Post-Award Type of Feedback Type of Feedback Category Feedback Commodity (Competitive) Use of the Bid Evaluation Model (BEM), when validated, is a best practice approach to evaluating competitive,
More informationARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN RELATED SERVICES
ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN RELATED SERVICES Section I Application (These procedures do not apply to Design-Build Contracts.)
More informationQUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION PART I QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS PLAN... 3
QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Quality Assurance Program Goal... 1 1.2 Concept of Quality Assurance... 1 1.3 Scope of (QASP)... 1 1.4 Three Part QASP...
More informationSOURCE SELECTION PLAN. {Insert if Phase I or Phase II} {Insert Project Name} {Insert Project Acronym} SOLICITATION XXXXXX-xx-R-xxxx
SOURCE SELECTION PLAN {Insert if Phase I or Phase II} {Insert Project Name} {Insert Project Acronym} SOLICITATION XXXXXX-xx-R-xxxx {INSERT MONTH & YEAR} COORDINATION: Contracting Officer Date IPT Leader
More informationCMMI Project Management Refresher Training
CMMI Project Management Refresher Training Classifica(on 2: Foxhole Technology Employees Only RMD 032 Project Management Refresher Training Course September 21, 2017 Version 1.0 The Process Approach The
More informationQuality Assurance Policy and Procedures
650 Montana Ave, Suite A Las Cruces, NM 88001 (575) 522-0430 www.rmgovernmentservices.com Quality Assurance Policy and Procedures PURPOSE. The purpose of this policy is to outline the quality assurance
More informationSection M: Evaluation Factors for Award HQ R LRDR Section M: Evaluation Factors for Award For HQ R-0002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 LRDR Section M: Evaluation Factors for Award For 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Table of
More informationJ. McCann & Co (Nottm) Ltd McCann House 110 Nottingham Road Chilwell Nottingham NG9 6DQ. Quality Manual
McCann House 110 Nottingham Road Chilwell Nottingham NG9 6DQ Quality Manual Quality Manual Issue I Dated 8 th October 2012 Contents Page Section 1 - Introduction 2 Section 2 - Company Details 2 Section
More informationMonitoring and Oversight Standards and Guidelines
Table of Contents 1. STANDARD... 3 2. BACKGROUND... 3 3. PURPOSE... 4 4. OVERSIGHT... 4 5. MONITORING PLAN... 5 5.1. Areas of Review... 6 6. OPERATIONS MONITORING... 7 Risk Assessment... 7 Scheduling...
More informationIndustry Outreach Quality
Mission and Installation Contracting Command Industry Outreach Quality Joe Merry Quality Assurance C-SPO Joe.merry@us.army.mil 10 August 2010 MICC Quality Program The MICC Quality Program is in the final
More informationPOLICY MANUAL FOR ISO 9001:2008. Document: PM-9001:2008 Date: April 7, Uncontrolled Copy
POLICY MANUAL FOR ISO 9001:2008 Document: PM-9001:2008 Date: April 7, 2015 REVIEWED BY: Tim Powers DATE: 4-7-2015 APPROVED BY: C._Bickford Uncontrolled Copy DATE: 4-7-2015 1.0 GENERAL ISS: 1 REV: E Page:
More informationMetropolitan Washington Airports Authority. Request for Qualifications Information (RFQI) RFQI No C084. for
Request for Qualifications Information (RFQI) RFQI No. for Project Controls Task Contract for Project Support & Management at Washington Dulles International Airport and Ronald Reagan Washington National
More information2017 Archaeology Audit Program Procedure Manual. April 2017
2017 Archaeology Audit Program Procedure Manual April 2017 Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents... 2 1.0 Introduction and Scope... 3 2.0 Audit Objectives... 3 3.0 Audit Procedures... 4 3.1 Audit
More informationA REPORT FROM THE OFFICE OF INTERNAL AUDIT
A REPORT FROM THE OFFICE OF INTERNAL AUDIT PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF BOISE, IDAHO AUDIT / TASK: #12-08S1, Purchasing Compliance AUDIT CLIENT: Purchasing / Cross-Functional REPORT DATE: August
More informationConflict of Interest Language
Project Development - Design Services The Consultant and subconsultants shall disclose in the Transmittal Letters that accompany the Statement of Qualifications (SOQ), all contracts or projects for which
More informationCQR-1. CONTRACTOR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS for CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Revision Date: 6/8/2015
CQR-1 CONTRACTOR QUALITY REQUIREMENTS for CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Revision Date: 6/8/2015 SCOPE This document establishes the minimum quality program requirements for a contractor providing equipment, material,
More information2017 Program Manual. Lighting and Appliances Program Program Manual. Lighting and Appliances PREPARED BY:
2017 Program Manual 2017 Program Manual Lighting and Appliances PREPARED BY: Lighting and Appliances Program CLEAResult 1 Allied Dr. Suite 1600 Little Rock, AR 72202 Contact: Effie Weaver Phone: 270-925-8358
More informationMetropolitan Washington Airports Authority. Request for Qualifications Information. Architectural / Engineering Task Contract Design Services
Request for Qualifications Information Architectural / Engineering Task Contract Design Services At Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport Washington Dulles International Airport Dulles Toll Road System
More informationISO 9001:2008 Quality Management System QMS Manual
2501 Kutztown Road Reading, PA, 19605 Tel. 610-929-3330 Fax 610-921-6861 ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management System QMS Manual The information contained in this document is Fidelity Technologies Corporation
More informationDATA ITEM DESCRIPTION
DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION Title: HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION PROGRAM PLAN Number: Approval Date: 20070404 AMSC Number: N7716 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility:
More informationRFP Restructuring Advisory Committee: Water and Sewer Question and Answer. Question Cut-Off 2/13/17
RFP 2017-0007 Restructuring Advisory Committee: Water and Sewer Question and Answer Question Cut-Off 2/13/17 1. What is the estimated value of the sewer system? Determining an appropriate valuation of
More informationSECTION 6.2: CONTRACT MANAGER
: Section 287.057(15), Florida Statutes, requires the department, for each contractual service contract, to designate an employee to be responsible for enforcing the performance of the contract terms and
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Requests for Proposals Page 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS CONSULTANT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT OF A DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PHASE I OF THE RESULTING PLAN SECTION I - INTRODUCTION
More informationROUND LAKE AREA SCHOOLS DISTRICT 116: LIMITED COMMISSIONING GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION Commissioning (Cx) is a quality assurance process that works to ensure the design intent of a building is fully realized. It requires a systematic approach to review, verify, and document
More information9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 9.1 OVERVIEW AND SCOPE Introduction
9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 9.1 OVERVIEW AND SCOPE 9.1.1 Introduction This chapter is the provisional Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the Jubilee Phase 1 Development project. The elements of
More informationSOW_Service Platform and Infrastructure_System and Database Architecture Page 1 of 35
A Statement of Work (SOW) is typically used when the task is well-known and can be described in specific terms. Statement of Objective (SOO) and Performance Work Statement (PWS) emphasize performance-based
More informationVFA SAMPLE RFP (DETAILED FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT)
VFA SAMPLE RFP (DETAILED FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT) I. Purpose As part of a strategic planning directive, the has decided to undertake a comprehensive condition audit and plant capital renewal
More informationReport of the Reliability Improvement Working Group (RIWG) Volume II - Appendices
Report of the Reliability Improvement Working Group (RIWG) Volume II - Appendices Appendix 1 Formulate Programs with a RAM Growth Program II-1 1.1 Reliability Improvement Policy II-3 1.2 Sample Reliability
More informationUNIVERSAL BUSINESS PAYMENT SOLUTIONS ACQUISITION CORPORATION CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
UNIVERSAL BUSINESS PAYMENT SOLUTIONS ACQUISITION CORPORATION I. Audit Committee Purpose CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the Audit
More information0. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUALITY MANUAL Conforming to ISO 9001:2008 0. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Description ISO 9001 Clause Page 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS n/a 2 1 PIMA VALVE, INC. DESCRIPTION n/a 3 2 QUALITY MANUAL DESCRIPTION 4.2.2
More informationA. Independence/Composition. The Committee shall be comprised of not less than three members. The members of the Committee:
SPARTAN MOTORS, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER Updated February 17, 2016 This Charter governs the organization and operation of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of (the Company ) and has been
More informationAMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER (as amended and restated as of September 26, 2017)
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER (as amended and restated as of September 26, 2017) Purpose The Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in its oversight
More informationSecurity Operations Manual
2018-01-01 Security Operations Manual 1 INTRODUCTION 2 2 CONTEXT 2 3 RISK 3 4 SCOPE 3 5 REFERENCES 4 6 SECURITY OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 4 7 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES 5 7.1 Security policy 6 8 RESOURCE
More informationCORPORATE QUALITY MANUAL
Corporate Quality Manual Preface The following Corporate Quality Manual is written within the framework of the ISO 9001:2008 Quality System by the employees of CyberOptics. CyberOptics recognizes the importance
More informationISO 9001: 2000 (December 13, 2000) QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION OVERVIEW MATRIX
In completing your Documented Quality Management System Review, it is important that the following matrix be completed and returned to us as soon as possible. This will save time during the review and
More informationCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
Template modified: 27 May 1997 14:30 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 63-501 31 MAY 1994 Certified Current 4 November 2009 Acquisition AIR FORCE ACQUISITION QUALITY PROGRAM
More informationREPORT 2015/030 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of the recruitment process at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2015/030 Audit of the recruitment process at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Overall results relating to recruitment process were initially assessed
More information2017 Program Manual Midstream
2017 Program Manual Midstream PREPARED BY: CLEAResult 1 Allied Dr. Suite 1600 Little Rock, AR 72202 Contact: Effie Weaver Phone: 270-925-8358 Email: eweaver@clearesult.com TABLE OF CONTENTS PROGRAM DESCRIPTION...
More informationVersion 1.0. The Contract Management Standard Final Edition. Version 1.0
The Management Standard Final Edition 1 Purpose of the Management Standard The purpose of the Management Standard is to describe the nature of contract management in terms of the contract management processes
More informationProject Management Techniques
ALUMASA QATAR Project Management Techniques A project is usually one time effort. Although similar work may have been done previously, every project has its own features and therefore is of non-repetitive
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES NOT AT RISK FOR THE. St. Charles County Ambulance District
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES NOT AT RISK FOR THE St. Charles County Ambulance District Base 3 & Training Facility Construction 4169 Old Mill Parkway St. Peters, MO 63376 September
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER ORGANIZATION AND PURPOSE The Board of Directors (the Board ) of Nabors Industries Ltd. (the Company ) has established the Audit Committee of the Board to carry out the duties and
More informationGuidance for Rating Each Performance Category on Contractor Performance Evaluation
Guidance for Rating Each Performance Category on Contractor Performance Evaluation Section 1: KNOWLEDGE Knowledge of WSSC Standards (Details/Specifications) Extremely knowledgeable of WSSC standards. Contractor
More informationCOLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO GOVERNANCE PROCESS MANUAL
COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO GOVERNANCE PROCESS MANUAL December 2016 Table of Contents Governance Roles and Responsibilities Table of Contents OVERVIEW OF GOVERNANCE... 3 GOVERNANCE ROLES
More informationQuality Assurance Manual
Quality Assurance Manual Current Electrical is committed to leading the market in satisfying customer needs by providing versatile and innovative electrical and control solutions We take pride in the ability
More informationBusiness Management System Manual Conforms to ISO 9001:2015 Table of Contents
Table of Contents 1.0 Welcome to Crystalfontz... 3 2.0 About the Crystalfontz Business Systems Manual... 4 3.0 Terms and Conditions... 5 4.0 Context of the Organization... 6 4.1. Understanding the Organization
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (As amended and restated on November 30, 2016.) The responsibilities of the Board of Directors of The Walt Disney Company
More informationREPORT 2015/091 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION
INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2015/091 Audit of the recruitment of national staff and individual contractors in the United Nations Mission in the Republic of South Sudan Overall results relating to the
More informationProcedures: QP 4 through QP 8, QP 16, QP 17, and QP 19
SRI Quality System Registrar Procedures: QP 4 through QP 8, QP 16, QP 17, and QP 19 Booklet Version 171122 Revision Date QP 4.0 Pre-Audit Registration Procedures 15 11/07/15 QP 5.0 On-Site Audit Procedure
More informationRequest for Letters of Intent. Connected Traffic Control System (CTCS): Research Planning and Concept Development. October 18, 2017.
Request for Letters of Intent Connected Traffic Control System (CTCS): Research Planning and Concept Development October 18, 2017 Issued by University of Virginia Center for Transportation Studies Charlottesville,
More informationCHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Purpose of the Audit Committee CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Audit Committee (the Committee ) is appointed by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of TechnipFMC plc (the Company
More informationReliance Aerospace Solutions
Reliance Aerospace Solutions Quality Manual The information contained in this document is the property of Reliance Aerospace Solutions, a division of Reliance Steel & Aluminum Company This manual is a
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED. the audits of the Company s financial statements;
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED I. Role of the Committee The Audit Committee (the Committee ) of the Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (the Company ) Board of
More informationRequest For Proposal Of Printing and Design Services. Marketing Department
Request For Proposal Of Printing and Design Services Marketing Department Released on June 3, 2016 Mosaic Youth Theatre of Detroit Printing and Design Services REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) BACKGROUND Mosaic
More informationReview of Duke Energy Florida, LLC Internal Audit Function
Review of Duke Energy Florida, LLC Internal Audit Function MAY 2017 B Y A U T H O R I T Y O F The Florida Public Service Commission Office of Auditing and Performance Analysis Review of Duke Energy Florida,
More informationGROUND RULES AND PRICING INSTRUCTIONS:
GROUND RULES AND PRICING INSTRUCTIONS: F-22 REPLENISHMENT SPARES PRICING CY2013 CY2017 REQUIREMENTS CONTRACT (MRC) WITH VARIABLE QUANTITIES I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: The objective of this Spares Requirements
More informationKPMG s Major Projects Advisory Project Leadership Series: Stakeholder Management and Communication
KPMG Global Energy Institute KPMG International KPMG s Major Projects Advisory Project Leadership Series: Stakeholder Management and Communication Stakeholder management and communication is critical to
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. Construction Management Services Not at Risk
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Construction Management Services Not at Risk The St. Charles County Ambulance District proposes to retain a qualified firm/team for the Construction Management Services Not at Risk
More informationA GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICES FOR CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
A GUIDE TO BEST PRACTICES FOR CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROCUREMENT POLICY (OFPP) OCTOBER 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 3 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION 5 OVERVIEW OF THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Customer Service Technical Engagement Services May 19, 2017 Due Date: June 7, 2017 by 5:00 pm EST 133 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 2900 Atlanta, GA 30303
More informationSUNEDISON, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (Adopted October 29, 2008)
SUNEDISON, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (Adopted October 29, 2008) I. Purpose The primary purpose of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee ) is to assist the Board of Directors in
More informationSUSQUEHANNA AREA REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY
SUSQUEHANNA AREA REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS Professional Construction Management Services Harrisburg International Airport Rehabilitate Runway 13-31 Susquehanna Area Regional
More informationTHE AUDIT COMMITTEE HANDBOOK
Summer 2009 THE AUDIT COMMITTEE HANDBOOK Ce document est également disponible en français. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 3... Part 1: ORGANIZATION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE 3... 1. Composition and Organization
More informationService Suppliers Performing Tightness Testing of Hatches With Ultrasonic Equipment on Ships, High Speed and Light Craft and Mobile Offshore Units
pproval of rvc upplrsno. 2.9 STANDARD FOR CERTIFICATION Approval Programmes Approval of Service Suppliers No. 403 Service Suppliers Performing Tightness Testing of Hatches With Ultrasonic Equipment on
More informationTransbay Transit Center Program
Transbay Transit Center Program Quality Management System Manual Revision 1 September 2013 Quality Management System Manual Revision 1 September 2013 Prepared for the Transbay Joint Powers Authority
More informationAICPA STANDARDS FOR PERFORMING AND REPORTING ON PEER REVIEWS. Effective for Peer Reviews Commencing on or After January 1, 2009
AICPA STANDARDS FOR PERFORMING AND REPORTING ON PEER REVIEWS Effective for Peer Reviews Commencing on or After January 1, 2009 Guidance for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews Copyright 2008 by American
More informationINTERNAL AUDIT REPORT PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (PMP)
INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE (PMP) Final Audit Report No. IAIG/2101 Issue Date: 17 October 2012 Audit report no. IAIG/2101: Project Practice (PMP) Page 1 Table of Contents I. OVERVIEW...
More informationBusiness Practice Manual for Reliability Requirements. Version 34
Business Practice Manual for Reliability Requirements Version 34 Last Revised: January 1, 2009July 28, 2010 Approval History Approval Date: 3/27/09 Effective Date: 3/31/09 BPM Owner: Chetty Mamandur BPM
More informationWELLS FARGO & COMPANY AUDIT AND EXAMINATION COMMITTEE CHARTER
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY AUDIT AND EXAMINATION COMMITTEE CHARTER PURPOSE: The purpose of the Audit and Examination Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities to oversee:
More informationSelf Assessment Workbook
Self Assessment Workbook Corporate Governance Audit Committee January 2018 Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Applicability The Self Assessment Workbook: Corporate Governance Audit Committee
More informationIntegrated Baseline Review (IBR) Guide
National Defense Industrial Association Program Management Systems Committee Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) Guide Revision 1 September 1, 2010 National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) 2111 Wilson
More informationDefinitions Definitions used in this document are taken from TNI SOP 7-100, and may be found there.
Request for Proposal (RFP) Evaluating Non-Governmental Accreditation Bodies BACKGROUND The NELAC Institute (TNI) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization whose mission is to foster the generation of environmental
More informationOffice of Internal Auditing
Office of Internal Auditing FY 2017 Annual Report Page Intentionally Blank CONTENTS Executive Summary... 4 Introduction... 5 Personnel/Proficiency/Professional Development... 6 Resources - Allocation...
More informationQuality Manual QM-9001 Revision 25 May 2013
Lion Precision 563 Shoreview Park Road Shoreview, MN 55126 Phone: (651) 484-6544 Fax: (651) 484-6824 info@lionprecision.com Quality Manual QM-9001 Revision 25 May 2013 Approved by: Don Martin, President
More informationKING III COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS
Principle element No Application method or explanation This document has been prepared in terms of the JSE Listings Requirements and sets out the application of the 75 Principles of the King III Report
More informationGKN Aerospace - St. Louis Supplier Quality Assurance Manual
GKN Aerospace - St. Louis Supplier Quality Assurance Manual This manual contains requirements that are applicable when invoked by GKN Aerospace St. Louis Purchase Orders. Use of this manual is required
More informationMANUAL QUALITY CONTROL & QUALITY ASSURANCE
MANUAL QUALITY CONTROL & QUALITY ASSURANCE METROTEC ENGINEERING LLC P.O. BOX: 26045, DUBAI U.A.E TEL : 043889771 FAX:043889772 E Mail: metrotecengg@yahoo.com info@metrotec.ae Web: www.metrotec.ae 2 TABLE
More informationOctober 1, 2016 September 30, 2017 CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN
September 28, 2016 October 1, 2016 September 30, 2017 CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT PLAN Management and Operations of the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF) U.S.
More informationAudit Committee Charter
Audit Committee Charter Organization (Adopted and Effective as of November 8, 2008) There shall be a committee of the Board of Directors of Redwood Trust, Inc. (Redwood) to be known as the Audit Committee.
More informationVIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS DIVISION MEMORANDUM. Charles A. Babish, PE State Materials Engineer Approved:
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MATERIALS DIVISION MEMORANDUM GENERAL SUBJECT: Revisions to Chapter VII of Manual of Instructions Materials Acceptance and Materials Notebook Program NUMBER: MD 407-17
More informationCalifornia Code of Regulations. Title 5. Education. Division 5. Board of Trustees of the California State Universities
California Code of Regulations Title 5. Education Division 5. Board of Trustees of the California State Universities Article 2.2 Management Personnel Plan 1 42720. Structure (a) The California State University
More informationQUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL This Manual is a Proprietary Document and any Unauthorized Reproduction is prohibited. ISSUE DATE July 26, 2012 AUTHORIZED BY: Quality Management Representative Eric Hoff Managing
More informationNEWMARK GROUP, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER. (as of December 2017)
NEWMARK GROUP, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (as of December 2017) Purpose The Audit Committee of Newmark Group, Inc. (the Company ) is appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board ) to
More informationCOST LOADED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES PART 1 - GENERAL
SECTION 01310 COST LOADED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SCOPE: A. COST LOADED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE (Construction Schedule): The WORK under this Contract shall be planned, scheduled, executed,
More informationAudit Committee Charter
Commonwealth Bank of Australia ACN 123 123 124 Audit Committee Charter 1. Purpose and Duties of the Audit Committee 1.1. The principal purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling
More informationREQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS (RFQ)
REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS (RFQ) Transition Initiatives for Stabilization Plus (TIS+) Provision of Support for Engineering Technical Supervision and Capacity Building for Baardhere Orientation Center (JSS021)
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (updated as of August 2016)
I. Purpose and Authority AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (updated as of August 2016) The Board of Directors (the Board ) of News Corporation (the Company ) has established an Audit Committee (the Audit Committee
More informationCHAPTER 11 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT EVALUATION SECTION 1 - GENERAL
CHAPTER 11 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT EVALUATION SECTION 1 - GENERAL 11-1. Purpose of Personnel Management Evaluation. Evaluation is an essential component in the personnel management process. Its purpose is
More informationAudit Report. Audit of Contracting and Procurement Activities
Audit Report August 2012 Recommended for Approval to the Deputy Minister by the Departmental Audit Committee on October 12, 2012 Approved by the Deputy Minister on October 18, 2012 Table of Contents Table
More information