Standard Operating Procedure
|
|
- Theodora Hoover
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Capability (Attendance and Performance) (Police Officer) Standard Operating Procedure Notice: This document has been made available through the Police Service of Scotland Freedom of Information Publication Scheme. It should not be utilised as guidance or instruction by any police officer or employee as it may have been redacted due to legal exemptions. Owning Department: Version Number: People and Development 2.00 Date Published: 10/10/2016 Version 2.00
2 Compliance Record Equality and Human Rights Impact Assessment (EqHRIA): Date Completed / Reviewed: Information Management Compliant: Health and Safety Compliant: Publication Scheme Compliant: 10/12/2013 Yes Yes Yes Version Control Table Version History of Amendments Date 1.00 Initial Approved Version 17/03/ Minor changes to nomenclature contained within the document such as PSoS to Police Scotland and Human Resources to People and Development. SOP has been formatted onto new corporate template 10/10/2016 Version
3 Contents 1. Purpose 2. Application 3. Introduction 4. Exclusions 5. Capability Principles 5.1 Confidentiality 5.2 Improvement and Validity Periods 5.3 Attending Meetings/Hearings 5.4 Right to be Accompanied 5.5 Record Keeping 5.6 Mitigating Circumstances 5.7 Performance and Development Review (PDR) 5.8 Advice and Support Mechanisms 6. Capability Procedure 6.1 Improvement Action 6.2 Formal Process 6.3 Stage 1 Performance Meeting 6.4 Stage 1 Performance Meeting Appeal 6.5 Stage 1 Assessment of Performance/Attendance Following First Improvement Period 6.6 Stage 2 Progress Meeting, Appeal Process and Assessment of Performance/Attendance 6.7 Stage 3 Performance Hearing 7. Roles and Responsibilities 7.1 Officers 7.2 Line Managers and Supervisors 7.3 Second Line Manager 7.4 Senior Management 7.5 People and Development 7.6 Occupational Health Version
4 Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C List of Associated Legislation List of Associated Reference Documents List of Associated Forms Version
5 1. Purpose (f) This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) supports the Scottish Police Authority (SPA)/Police Service of Scotland (Police Scotland) Employee Relations Policy. This SOP aims to provide an effective framework to manage police officer underperformance and attendance in a fair and reasonable manner. This will involve giving appropriate training and support to ensure a culture of learning and development and improved performance and attendance wherever possible. This SOP provides: the process for managing underperformance; the process for managing poor attendance, in circumstances where the Attendance Management SOP fails to provide the necessary support and improvement; and guidance to support officers and line managers affected by the process. This SOP is not designed to deal with minor day to day issues relating to performance and attendance and does not apply to conduct issues. Further information is available in section 4. This SOP will operate in line with the Equality, Diversity and Dignity SOP and the Police Service of Scotland (Performance) Regulations Further advice on the content of this SOP can be obtained from line managers or People and Development 2. Application This SOP applies to all police officers who have completed their probation up to the rank of Chief Superintendent. The only exceptions to this are officers on temporary service within Police Scotland or Police Scotland officers who are on temporary service outwith Police Scotland. 3. Introduction The success of SPA/ Police Scotland is dependent upon effective contributions from all officers. In this regard, the SPA/ Police Scotland are committed to proactive performance management which ensures that officers are aware of the performance and attendance levels expected of them, that these levels are honestly reviewed on a regular basis and officers are provided with appropriate training and support to meet these levels. All officers within Police Scotland have a responsibility to perform their duties to an acceptable level, and will be given all reasonable support and encouragement to help them to do so. Version
6 While the vast majority of officers meet or exceed the demands of their respective roles, some officers can find themselves struggling to operate at an acceptable level from time to time. It is recognised that appropriate support is required to assist with improving performance and attendance. (f) Unsatisfactory performance is defined as an inability or failure of the officer to perform the duties of their role or rank (or both) to a satisfactory standard. Unsatisfactory performance can also include poor attendance. Unsatisfactory performance can become apparent in a number of different ways. This may include (not an exhaustive list): poor standards of work, e.g. frequent mistakes, not following a job through, unable to cope with instructions given; inability to cope with a reasonable volume of work to a satisfactory standard; poor interpersonal skills resulting in poor relationships with colleagues or members of the public; lack of apparent skill/method of work required; poor communication skills i.e. written or verbal; consistently not achieving reasonably agreed and realistic set targets/objectives; failing to achieve or sustain required qualifications/training courses; or, inability to attend work to a level that results in a difficulty to effectively perform roles and responsibilities. This SOP aims to ensure, where an officer is assessed as not performing/attending to an acceptable level, they are assisted to improve their performance/attendance in a consistent, fair and supportive manner and at the earliest opportunity. This will be achieved by providing the appropriate support, assistance, development and reasonable time needed in order to affect an improvement. The focus will always be on resolving performance issues through improvement action (refer to section 6.1, where possible. This applies equally to attendance issues, where support for attendance will be offered via the Attendance Management SOP. Only when the support offered in the Attendance Management SOP does not result in improvement in attendance will the Capability (Attendance and Performance) SOP for Police Officers be considered for attendance issues. Where performance/attendance concerns are similar or connected to each other they will be considered together throughout this process. However, there may be occasions where more than one capability process is being required to run concurrently for an officer where the two (or more) performance/attendance issue exist and are not similar or related. Version
7 (g) (h) (i) Reasonable adjustments will be made for officers with a disability (including the officer accompanying them to a meeting) throughout this process if required. Reasonable adjustments must also have been considered prior to the process if applicable as outlined in section 5.6. Where the capability procedure fails to result in a suitable level of performance/ attendance, this SOP aims to support to officer in order to enable them to continue with the Police Scotland, although there is no guarantee that this will be possible. For the purpose of this SOP, working days means any day other than: a Saturday or Sunday; a day which is a bank holiday in Scotland; or a day which is a public holiday in Scotland. 4. Exclusions This SOP is not designed to deal with the day to day management of officers but is to be used when there is an ongoing issue relating to performance/attendance that requires a structured approach. SPA/ Police Scotland also recognises the difference between the deliberate failure of an officer to achieve the levels expected of them, and instances where an officer is unable to carry out their duties to an acceptable level. The same principle applies to attendance where this SOP will only be used where the officer s absence is genuine. Instances where an officer is able but unwilling to carry out duties and/or it is believed that absence is unauthorised will be managed via the Conduct SOP. This SOP should not be used for an attendance issue as a result of an injury/illness whilst a police officer is being considered for ill health retirement in relation to this injury/illness. Where it is determined that an officer should not be progressed or is not eligible for ill health retirement consideration can be given to this issue being progressed through the Capability (Attendance and Performance) SOP. For more information on the Ill Health Retirement process refer to the Ill Health Retirement SOP. Where consideration is being given to using the performance regulations for an issue that is not related to the injury/illness being considered for ill health retirement this must be discussed with People and Development. Version
8 5. Capability Principles 5.1 Confidentiality All capability reviews should be dealt with in the strictest confidence. Any unjustified disclosure regarding a capability situation could be subject to investigation under Police Service of Scotland (Performance) Regulations 2014 (police officers). 5.2 Improvement Periods and Validity Periods At each stage of the capability process the relevant manager should set timescales for improvement of performance/attendance. This will be referred to as the improvement period and should normally be for a period of 12 weeks, taking into account the balance between providing adequate time for improvement and the requirement of the Police Scotland for effective work performance/attendance as soon as possible. Where required, the improvement period may vary from the 12 week improvement period, however in line with Regulation 10 of the Police Service of Scotland (Performance) Regulations 2014, the improvement period must not be longer than 12 months. As well as meeting the required performance/attendance level by the end of the improvement period there is a requirement to maintain that performance/attendance level until the end of the validity period, which is 12 months from the date that the improvement period commenced. Where the improvement period is extended the validity period will also be extended in line with Regulation 11 of the Police Service of Scotland (Performance) Regulations Only when an officer meets the satisfactory performance/attendance level and maintains it for the duration of the validity period will the capability procedure end. Where an officer meets the satisfactory performance/attendance level and then fails to maintain the level expected during the validity period the officer will progress to the next stage of the formal process. Normally the only circumstances when an extension to the improvement period will be considered will be certified or disability/pregnancy related sick leave, authorised leave periods, training availability or where an officer has not had sufficient time to improve due to an emergency deployment to other duties. In any other circumstances, line managers must seek advice from People and Development prior to extending timescales. The improvement period will not be extended for sick leave where the reason for progression to the Capability Procedure relates to the officer s attendance. Advice should be sought from People and Development where there is disability/pregnancy related sick leave during the improvement period. Version
9 (f) This section is in line with Regulation 10 of the Police Service of Scotland (Performance) Regulations 2014 and the Performance Regulations Scottish Government Policy Guidance. 5.3 Attending Meetings/Hearings Line managers will arrange meetings during the officer s working hours (unless otherwise agreed with the officer) and individuals are required to attend meetings/hearings initiated by this SOP. A date and time must be agreed with the officer and if no date or time can be agreed then the relevant manager will specify a date and time. For officers who are absent from work, attendance at meetings is not subject to the same considerations as reporting to work. An illness or injury may result in an officer being unfit for their work without affecting their ability to attend a meeting/hearing. The location of a meeting can be flexible where this would form part of a reasonable adjustment e.g. the meeting does not require to take place at a police station where the officer has mobility issues. Where the officer and/or police representative are not available at that date and time the meeting must be postponed to an alternative date and time that is reasonable and falls no later than 10 working days from the date first specified. Where an alternative meeting cannot be arranged within this time Regulation 7 of the Police Service of Scotland (Performance) Regulations 2014 confirms that a meeting can take place in their absence. In the case of a hearing this could also be conducted via video, telephone or other conferencing technology. (f) Any decision to progress to a meeting/hearing in the officer and/or police representative s absence should be taken based on the circumstances of the case and in full consultation with People and Development. For example, more flexibility may be provided where an officer is temporarily incapacitated and it would not be reasonable to expect the meeting to take place within 10 working days of the initial date and time of the meeting/hearing. This section is in line with Regulation 7, 14, 19, 23, 28, 36 and 45 of the Police Service of Scotland (Performance) Regulations 2014 and the Performance Regulations Scottish Government Policy Guidance. 5.4 Right to be Accompanied Officer s may be represented by representatives from the Scottish Police Federation or Association of Scottish Police Superintendents (as appropriate). Alternatively, officers may be represented by another police officer within the Police Scotland. Version
10 (f) (g) Officers will not be permitted to be accompanied to meetings by a representative who is otherwise involved in any aspect of the officer s performance/attendance being considered as part of the Capability (Attendance and Performance) SOP. The responsibility for arranging to be accompanied rests with the officer. Officers must provide their manager with the name of the person attending at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. A police representative may: advise the officer throughout any proceedings under the Capability (Attendance and Performance) SOP; accompany the officer to any meeting or hearing which the officer is required to attend under the Capability (Attendance and Performance) SOP; make representations on the officer s behalf at any meeting/hearing under the Capability (Attendance and Performance) SOP. This includes asking questions of any witnesses where the officer is entitled to do so; and make representations to the Deputy Chief Constable (Designate) concerning any aspect of the proceedings under the Capability (Attendance and Performance) SOP; A police representative must be permitted a reasonable amount of duty time for the purpose of performing this role. This section is in line with Regulation 6 of the Police Service of Scotland (Performance) Regulations 2014 and the Performance Regulations Scottish Government Policy Guidance. 5.5 Record Keeping Line managers are required to keep written records of improvement action, via SCoPE and formal capability process using the capability forms available on the Intranet. Records will detail: the nature of the performance/attendance issues including examples; any mitigating circumstances; the support or training offered or any action taken and the reasons for it; evidence to support any performance/attendance improvement or ongoing shortfalls; the improvement required; the timescales for reviewing performance/attendance; and whether an appeal was lodged if there was a right to appeal, its outcome and any subsequent developments. Version
11 Records must be treated confidentially and should be recorded accurately, timeously and be relevant. Records should be marked with the appropriate Government Protective Marking. Copies of the meeting records should be given to the officer. Copies of all capability records must be provided to People and Development for information at the conclusion of each stage of the capability process. All original records should be sent to People and Development at the conclusion of the capability procedure. Additional copies, whether manual or electronic, are not to be retained by the line manager and must be securely destroyed at the conclusion of the capability procedure once receipt has been confirmed by People and Development. (f) Records will be retained securely by People and Development following the conclusion of the capability procedure in line with the relevant Record Retention SOP. 5.6 Mitigating Circumstances When considering a case of underperformance, it may become clear that mitigating circumstances, such as personal problems are contributing to an officer s underperformance. Mitigating circumstances do not mean that the capability procedure cannot be followed, simply that the impact of the circumstances on the officer s performance, competence or standard of work must be fully assessed as part of the process. In addition, actions that the officer is taking to address the circumstances and any support which may be available from SPA/ Police Scotland should be considered. Line managers should offer any suitable support as per section 5.8 and refer to People and Development for further advice and support where required. If an officer has a disability that may be contributing to underperformance/ attendance the Disability in Employment SOP must be followed prior to consideration of capability procedures being invoked. The capability procedure will only be initiated where the disability process has been followed and performance is still below the level expected despite all reasonable adjustments having been put in place. Where additional reasonable adjustments are identified through the capability procedure these should be implemented and advice should be sought from People and Development in relation to progressing the capability process. Consideration of mitigating circumstances for attendance issues are included in the Attendance Management SOP as part of the process before deciding whether to progress an attendance issue for consideration through the Capability (Attendance and Performance) SOP. However, where mitigating circumstances emerge following the progression to the Capability (Attendance and Version
12 Performance) SOP, these should obviously still be considered. For example, officers may be referred to Occupational Health for up to date information and advice at any stage during the Capability Process if it will assist in identifying ways to support the officer in improving their attendance. 5.7 Performance and Development Review (PDR) The PDR system will continue alongside any action taken under the capability procedure. Where a need to improve work performance standards is identified this should also be supported through appraisal evidence. 5.8 Advice and Support Mechanisms It is recognised that officers may require support and assistance throughout the capability procedure. The following sources of assistance may be available: The officer s line manager; People and Development; Occupational Health; Employee Wellbeing/Assistance Programmes; Scottish Police Federation or Association of Scottish Police Superintendents Representatives; and, Diversity staff groups. Further information, including contact details can be found on the Intranet or from line managers or People and Development. Line managers can seek advice and support from their line manager and/or People and Development as required. 6. Capability Procedure Notices are available via the Force Forms section of the intranet. A list of the relevant standard letters is contained in Appendix C. The procedures outlined in sections are in line with Parts 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the Police Service of Scotland (Performance) Regulations 2014 and the Performance Regulations Scottish Government Policy Guidance. Version
13 6.1 Improvement Action Support Before Consideration of the Formal Capability Process (f) (g) Improvement action should be initiated by the line manager and will normally arise from initial concerns regarding the officer s performance. Improvement action aims to resolve the area of concern and to ensure satisfactory levels of performance are achieved and maintained. With regards to attendance issues the support offered before consideration of the Capability Process is included in the Attendance Management SOP. Only where the support offered in the Attendance Management SOP fails to deal with attendance issues would the formal process outlined from section 6.2 be considered for attendance issues. Improvement action and the Attendance Management SOP allows managers to examine the circumstances and give support to the officer to help them to improve to the required level of competence before considering any formal action. Officers who have previously performed a role to a suitable level may simply require informal support to assist them to improve their performance to the previous level. Line managers should ensure that senior management are fully aware of all capability matters and seek advice from People and Development before and/or throughout the improvement action as required. Line managers should contact People and Development to establish any relevant past capability matters if required. Where a line manager has concerns regarding an officer s performance or standard of work, they should initially discuss the concerns with the officer on an informal basis to: remind the officer of the performance levels expected; identify clearly the ways in which the officer is under-performing and provide examples as appropriate; identify any mitigating circumstances (see section 5.6); provide encouragement and, where appropriate, training or support; and, advise that a failure to improve performance will result in progression to the formal capability procedure outlined in section 6.2 of this SOP. Although this is an informal stage of the process it will often be appropriate to provide targets for improvement and a timescale for achieving these targets. The requirement for targets/timescales and the targets/timescales themselves should be determined on a case by case basis. The line manager should keep notes of the informal discussion that have taken place in line with section 5.5 and record all relevant information on SCoPE. The line manager must ensure it is clear to the officer that this is the informal stage of the capability procedure. Version
14 (h) The discussions should be two-way with the emphasis on finding ways in which the officer can remedy any underperformance with appropriate support from line managers. (i) (j) (k) Line managers will be responsible for resolving any managerial, organisational or environmental issues which are identified as causes of poor performance. Where mitigating circumstances are identified, line managers should refer to section 5.6 and offer any appropriate support as outlined in section 5.8. Where required, an Action Plan (form ) can be developed to help ensure improvement informally. If improvement action does not result in a satisfactory improvement in performance the line manager should seek advice from People and Development before informing the officer that there will be a requirement to progress to the First Stage of the formal process outlined in section Formal Process Any line manager progressing to the formal stages of the capability procedure must ensure that they: have the relevant evidence of the underperformance/attendance; have exhausted improvement action or that Attendance Management SOP (unless advised differently by People and Development); have informed their line manager of the capability case; and have discussed the issue with People and Development. 6.3 Stage 1 Performance Meeting Where improvement action or the Attendance Management SOP have been unsuccessful in improving performance/ attendance the officer will be required to attend a Performance Meeting with their first line manager. People and Development may attend the meeting if required following discussion with the first line manager. The first line manager will provide the officer with a Notice of Requirement to Attend Performance Meeting ( ). The officer will be provided with at least five working days notice of the proposed meeting date. When writing to the officer the line manager will include the following: Version
15 notification of the procedures to confirm or rearrange the date and time of the meeting (in line with section 5.3 of the Capability (Attendance and Performance) SOP); the respect in which the officer s performance/attendance is considered to be unsatisfactory; the possible outcomes of a performance meeting, progress meeting and performance hearing; any proposed attendance at the meeting of a People and Development professional or a police adviser to advise the first line manager on the proceedings; any proposed attendance at the meeting of any other named person and the officer s right to refuse to consent to their attendance; the officer s right to seek advice from a police representative; the officer s right to be represented at the meeting by a police representative; and, the requirement to provide to the first line manager a copy of any documents on which the officer intends to rely at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. (f) When writing to the officer the line manager must also include a copy of any document relied upon in coming to the view that the performance/attendance of the officer is unsatisfactory. The line manager should keep a record of the meeting that has taken place using the Written Record of Meeting (number ). If a First Written Improvement Notice (number ) is issued this will be provided to the officer within five working days of the meeting. This will be accompanied with a record of the meeting and any supporting action plan ( ) both of which the officer will be required to sign and return to their first line manager within seven working days. The First Written Improvement Notice ( ), Written Record of Meeting ( ) and any supporting Action Plan ( ) will ensure that the officer is informed of the: respect in which the officer s performance/attendance is considered unsatisfactory improvements required; period within which that improvement is required to take place i.e. First Improvement Period; validity period in which the officer will be required to maintain their improvement following the First Improvement Period; the officer s right to make comments on the record of the meeting within seven working days from the date on which the copy of that record is received by the officer; Version
16 circumstances in which the officer may be required to attend a progress meeting; arrangements (to be) made to assist/monitor their attainment and maintenance; timescales or review periods involved where appropriate; ownership of specific actions; and, right to appeal a First Written Improvement Notice ( ) ( (refer to section 6.4). (g) (h) Following provision of the First Written Improvement Notice ( ) and receipt of the signed Written Record of Meeting ( ) and Action Plan ( ) the first line manager must ensure that these are retained together. The first line manager must then ensure that a copy of the First Written Improvement Notice ( ) and completed Written Record of Meeting ( ) are provided to People and Development. The action plan ( ) should be provided to People and Development when the action plan ( ) is complete. 6.4 Stage 1 Performance Meeting Appeal Appeals against a First Written Improvement Notice ( ) must be submitted to the officer s second line manager within seven working days of receipt of the improvement notice. This appeal will be considered as soon as reasonably practicable by the second line manager. The submission of an appeal does not affect the continuing operation of a First Written Improvement Notice ( ) Submission of Appeal An officer may appeal against the finding that the officer s performance/ attendance is unsatisfactory and any term of the improvement notice within 7 working days of receiving the improvement notice and this should be submitted on an Appeal Against Finding and Outcome of Performance Meeting (form ). The terms are: the respect in which the officer s performance/attendance is considered unsatisfactory the improvement that is required in performance/attendance; and the length of the improvement period. The grounds for appeal are: that the finding of unsatisfactory performance/attendance is unreasonable; that any of the terms outlined in 6.6. are unreasonable; Version
17 that there is evidence that could not reasonably have been considered at the performance meeting which could have affected materially the finding of unsatisfactory performance/attendance or the terms; and, that there was a breach of the procedures set out in this SOP or any other unfairness which could have affected materially the finding of unsatisfactory performance/attendance or the terms An appeal should include the following: the finding or the term (or both) against which the appeal is made; the grounds of appeal; and, any evidence on which the officer intends to rely Consideration of Appeal The Chair of the appeal must decide whether to require the officer is required to attend an appeal meeting or determine the appeal without the need for a meeting. The decision to determine an appeal without a meeting must only be taken where the officer agrees to this approach. If an appeal meeting is to be held the second line manager must provide the officer with a Notice of Requirement to Attend Performance Appeal Meeting (number ) giving details that mirror the requirements of section 6.3 of this SOP. The only exception to this is that there is no requirement for the officer to provide the second line manager with any documents in advance other than the appeal documentation they have already submitted. At the meeting the second line manager must provide: the officer with the opportunity to make representations; and, the police representative (where applicable) with the opportunity to make representations in line with section 5.4 of this SOP. The second line manger may postpone or adjourn the performance appeal meeting to a later date or time if it appears necessary or expedient to do so and rules for organising this meeting are in line with section 5.3 of this SOP Appeal Outcome Following the appeal meeting the second line manager may confirm or reverse the finding of unsatisfactory performance/attendance; and confirm or vary any of the relevant terms against which the appeal is made. Version
18 Where the second line manager reverses or varies any decision this will substitute the finding, the First Written Improvement Notice ( ) (and the terms against which the appeal was made. Copies of updated First Written Improvement Notice ( ) and Action Plan ( ) (where applicable) should be provided to People and Development at the completion of the appeal process. This should also be accompanied by a record of the meeting. 6.5 Stage One Assessment of Performance/Attendance at the Conclusion of the First Improvement Period During the improvement period the line manager will hold regular informal meetings with the officer, to provide feedback on the progress and to continue to encourage improved performance or attendance. The line manager will record a note of these meetings via the Written Record of Meeting ( ) and update the Action Plan ( ) as required. A Performance/Attendance Review Meeting will be held at the end of the First Improvement Period by the officer s first line manager to assess whether sufficient improvement in performance/attendance has been achieved and sustained or whether a Progress Meeting is required. Information in relation to this meeting must be recorded by the line manager on a First Line Manager Review ( ). The performance/attendance review meeting will identify how the capability process will progress depending on whether the line manager considers that: the performance/attendance levels have been fully met; circumstances are identified which warrant the review period being extended; or there has been unsatisfactory improvement in performance/attendance. Advice should be sought from People and Development in advance of any review meeting where it is not likely that the performance/attendance standards will be fully met. It must be ensured that People and Development are aware of the outcome of any Performance/Attendance Review Meeting Performance/Attendance Standards Fully Met If the review meeting establishes that there has been a sufficient improvement in performance/attendance the line manager will acknowledge this, and the officer will be advised of the requirement for the improvement in their performance/attendance to be sustained for the length of the validity period. Version
19 Written notification of this will be provided (letter template available from People and Development), which will be maintained in the officer s personal file for the length of the validity period. Where there is concern that performance/attendance has subsequently returned to an unsatisfactory level during the validity period the capability procedure will resume at the Stage 1 review meeting to determine whether the officer should be progressed to the Stage 2 Progress Meeting (refer to section 6.6). The First Improvement Notice will be removed from the People and Development File in line with the relevant Record Retention SOP/schedule Circumstances Identified for Extension of Improvement Period Circumstances may be identified that merit an extension of the improvement period to ensure performance/attendance can be appropriately assessed before deciding whether to progress to the next stage. The line manager must receive approval from an officer of the rank of Superintendent or above. An extension to the review period will normally only be permitted once before deciding to progress to the next stage Unsatisfactory Improvement If the review meeting establishes that there has not been a satisfactory improvement in performance/attendance the procedure will go to a Progress Meeting as outlined in section 6.6. This will require the first line manager to advise People and Development and progress all relevant paperwork to the second line manager to ensure they are prepared and aware of the requirement to progress to Stage Stage 2 Progress Meeting, Appeal Process and Assessment of Performance/Attendance Where the First Written Improvement Notice (Should this be review meeting identifies an insufficient improvement in performance/attendance the officer receive a Notice of Requirement to Attend Progress Meeting ( ) from their second line manager. People and Development may attend the meeting if required following discussion with the second line manager. The process for the Progress meeting will mirror that outlined in section 6.3 for the Performance Meeting with the only differences being: the Progress Meeting will be carried out by the Second Line Manager and the written record will be included on a Written Record of Meeting ( ); the Progress Meeting may only consider performance/attendance issues that are similar to or connected with the unsatisfactory performance/attendance referred to in the First Written Improvement Notice. Version
20 the Second Line Manager will be able to refer to improvement action and support provided during the Performance Meeting; the First Line Manager may be in attendance to provide information in relation to the previous stage; the outcome of the Progress Meeting, where no or insufficient improvement was determined, would be a Final Written Improvement Notice ( ) rather than a First Written Improvement Notice (Should this be i.e. failure to improve following Progress Meeting would result in a Performance Hearing rather than Progress Meeting; and appeals against a Final Written Improvement Notice ( ) will be submitted on an Appeal Against Finding and Outcome of Progress Meeting (number ) to the senior manager (third line manager) within seven working days of receipt of the improvement notice. The hearing must then take place as soon as is reasonably practicable and, where applicable, the individual must receive a Notice of Requirement to Attend Progress Appeal Meeting ( ) and a Determination of Progress Appeal Meeting ( ) to inform the officer of the outcome. the reasons, grounds and process for appeals are the same as stage one with the addition that an appeal may be submitted on the basis that the performance/attendance issue is not similar to or connected with the unsatisfactory performance/attendance referred to in the First Written Improvement Notice Where an officer is required to attend a progress meeting and it is found that the officer s performance or attendance has improved or been maintained (contrary to the first line manager s assessment) the second line manager will inform the officer that no further action will be taken at that meeting. The First Written Improvement Notice ( ) will remain in place for the entire validity period and the officer can still be required to attend another progress meeting if they do not maintain their improvement throughout the 12 months that the improvement notice is valid. The performance/attendance review meeting at the end of the improvement period would continue to be carried out by the officer s line manager and therefore this would mirror the process outlined in section 6.4. If the review meeting establishes that there has not been a satisfactory improvement in performance/attendance the formal process will progress to stage three which may result in dismissal with notice or a reduction in rank due to incapability as per section Stage 3 Performance Hearing Version
21 Where the Stage 2 process has been unsuccessful in satisfactorily improving and maintaining performance/attendance the officer will be progressed to a Performance Hearing Nomination of Chair and People And Development Professional (Where Applicable) People and Development will recommend an appropriate chair to the Deputy Chief Constable (Designate) who will confirm this selection. The Chair will normally be a Chief Superintendent with relevant experience who has not been involved in a previous stage of the procedure, however the Chair may be a Superintendent provided that they have the relevant experience and that the nomination is approved by the Deputy Chief Constable (Designate). In addition a People and Development Professional and/or Police Adviser may be appointed to advise the Chair on the Performance Hearing. Their role is to advise on process and they are not there to support the decision making process. Nominations should be selected on the basis that there are no reasonable concerns that those selected could act impartially. An officer may object to the appointment of the Chair, People and Development Professional and/or Police Adviser and this objection must be made in writing to People and Development no longer than three working days after being notified in writing of their requirement to attend a Performance Hearing. This objection must indicate the officer s reasons for objecting. People and Development must recommend to the Deputy Chief Constable (Designate) whether to uphold an objection and must notify the officer in writing of that decision. If the objection is upheld the Deputy Chief Constable (Designate) must nominate a replacement, following a recommendation from People and Development, and inform the officer in writing of the person appointed. People and Development must arrange for those appointed under section to receive the following: any document which was available to the first line manager in relation to the performance meeting; any document which was available to the second line manager in relation to the progress meeting; the records of the performance meeting and the progress meeting; any submission made under section 6.7.3; documents relating to appeals from the Performance and Progress Meetings; and the First Written Improvement Notice ( ) and the Final Written Improvement Notice ( ). Version
22 6.7.2 Timescale for Performance Hearing The Performance Hearing must take place not later than 35 working days after a notice has been sent to attend a Performance Hearing. The Chair may extend this time period if it would be in the interests of fairness to do so Notification of Requirement to Attend Performance Hearing The Senior Manager must write to the officer using a Notice of Requirement to Attend Performance Hearing (106/017) inviting them to a Performance Hearing. The notice will include the following: Details of the nominated chair and People and Development professional (where applicable) and their right to object to these nominations (refer to section 6.7.1) for more details) notification of the procedures to confirm or rearrange the date and time of the meeting (in line with section 5.3 of the Capability (Attendance and Performance) SOP; the respect in which the officer s performance/attendance is considered to be unsatisfactory; the possible outcomes of a performance hearing; The officer s entitlement to provide a written submission to be considered during the hearing (refer to section for more details) The process for requesting consideration of witnesses (refer to section for more details) any proposed attendance at the meeting of the first line manager, the second line manager or the senior manager; any proposed attendance at the meeting of any other named person and the officer s right to refuse to consent to their attendance; the officer s right to seek advice from a police representative; the officer s right to be represented at the meeting by a police representative; and the requirement to provide to the chair a copy of any documents on which the officer intends to rely at least seven days in advance of the meeting Officer s Written Submission Version
23 The officer must, not later than 20 working days from receipt, respond in writing to the Written Notice to Attend Performance Hearing Form. The officer must confirm whether they accept/do not accept the first line manager s opinion to progress to a hearing. Where the officer accepts the first line manager s opinion they may make a written submission to the Deputy Chief Constable (Designate) confirming this. Alternatively where the officer wishes to dispute the requirement to progress to a hearing they must submit a written submission explaining the reasons for not accepting that opinion. A written submission must be accompanied by any document on which the officer intends to rely at the performance hearing Selection of Witnesses (f) The first line manager and the officer must, no later than 10 working days after receipt by the first line manager of the officer s response under section 6.7.3, supply to each other the names and addresses of any witnesses on whom they propose to rely at the performance hearing and a summary of the evidence each witness will give; or notice that they do not intend to rely on any witnesses. The senior manager and the officer must, if it is reasonably practicable to do so, agree on a joint list of witnesses and provide that list to the Chair. If it is not possible to agree on a joint list of witnesses, they must each supply their own list of proposed witnesses to the chair. As soon as reasonably practicable after receiving lists of witnesses the Chair must decide which, if any, of the listed witnesses should attend the hearing and notify the senior manager and the officer of that decision. The Chair may determine that witnesses not included in any list under this regulation (whether joint or otherwise) are to attend the performance hearing. The Chair must not decide that any witness is to give evidence at the performance hearing unless they reasonably consider that it is necessary for the witness to do so. The Chair must notify in writing any witness who is to attend the performance hearing via the Determination of Witnesses ( ) The Hearing Version
24 Where the Chair decides to postpone or adjourn a performance hearing in line with section 6.7.1, they must notify the Deputy Chief Constable (Designate), the officer and nominated People and Development Professional/police adviser (where applicable) of the revised date, time and place of hearing and the reasons for the postponement or adjournment. The Chair should keep a record of the meeting by completing a Written Record of Meeting ( ). At the hearing the Chair must: explain to the officer how their performance/attendance is considered to be unsatisfactory; and, provide the officer, or the officer s police representative, with an opportunity to make representations in response. The Chair may permit the officer or police representative to ask questions of any witness and an audio recording of the hearing must be made and the officer must, on request be supplied with a copy of that recording Following the Performance Hearing Following the performance hearing the Chair must decide whether: the officer has in fact met the required improvement in performance/attendance; or the officer has failed to make the required improvement in performance/attendance by the end of the Final Improvement Period, or failed to maintain this improvement until the end of the validity period. Within three working days of the conclusion of the performance hearing the Chair must give both the officer and their first line manager the Performance Hearing Notification of Decision and Disposal ( ). This will contain: the decision; the reason for the decision; and the outcome following this decision (refer to section for more details). Where an officer is required to attend a performance hearing and it is found that the officer s performance/attendance has improved or been maintained (contrary to the second line manager s assessment) the chair will inform the officer that no further action will be taken at that meeting. The first improvement notice will remain in place for the entire validity period and the officer can still be required to attend another performance hearing if they do not maintain their improvement throughout the 12 months that the improvement notice is valid. Version
25 6.7.8 Performance Hearing Outcome If the chair decides that the officer s performance/attendance is unsatisfactory they may order: Dismissal with notice; Demotion in rank; or an extension of the Final Written Improvement Notice. If dismissal is ordered the period of notice must be determined by the Chair, but must be not less than 28 days; An extension of the Final Written Improvement Notice ( ) may be ordered only where the Chair is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances which justify such an outcome. If an extension of the Final Written Improvement Notice ( ) is ordered the Chair must amend the terms of the Final Written Improvement Notice: to state that if the officer does not make a sufficient improvement in performance/attendance within a reasonable period specified by the Chair (being a period of no more than six months from the date of extension) the officer may be required to attend a further performance hearing; and, to specify a new validity period. The Chair may also amend the terms of the Final Written Improvement Notice ( ) which relate to: the respect in which the officer s performance/attendance is considered to be unsatisfactory; or the improvement that is required in the officer s performance/attendance Appeals Appeals at this stage must be submitted to People and Development no later than 30 working days from the date that written notice of the outcome of hearing was provided to the officer. This appeal should be submitted on an Appeal Against Finding of Performance Hearing ( ). People and Development will recommend a Senior Officer to the Deputy Chief Constable (Designate) to conduct the hearing. Where the appealing officer is a Chief Superintendent a Deputy Chief Constable other than the Deputy Chief Constable (Designate) will be nominated. The Chair of the appeal must send Notice of Requirement to Attend Appeal Against Outcome of Performance Hearing ( ) to the officer within 30 Version
26 working days of receiving the appeal requiring the officer to attend an appeal hearing, whilst also specifying the date and time for that hearing. The appeal hearing is to be heard not more than 10 working days from the date on which the officer received notice to attend the appeal hearing. The officer must receive a Determination of Performance Hearing Appeal ( ). Where an officer is demoted or dismissed the reasons, grounds and process for appeals as is outlined at section 6.4 of this SOP with the following differences: an appeal may also be submitted on the basis that the performance/attendance issues is not similar to or connected with the unsatisfactory performance/attendance referred to in the Final Written Improvement Notice; and the chair s decision to hold an appeal hearing or determine the appeal without holding a hearing is a decision for the chair and is not dependent on whether the officer wishes a hearing to take place. 7. Roles and Responsibilities 7.1 Officers Officers are responsible for: ensuring they understand their role in the organisation; highlighting any areas of concern with their line manager; keeping up to date with any necessary skills to carry out their role; performing and attending to the required level; passing exams/training courses where applicable; and attending any meetings and hearings convened in accordance with the capability procedure. 7.2 Line Managers and Supervisors Line managers and supervisors are responsible for: the overall management and performance of officers under their supervision; setting realistic levels of performance and attendance; providing adequate support, training and guidance to ensure all officers have the opportunity to perform well and attend work where possible; discussing performance and attendance with officers and providing regular feedback; Version
Derbyshire Constabulary GUIDANCE ON UNSATISFACTORY ATTENDANCE PROCEDURES (UAP) FOR POLICE STAFF POLICY REFERENCE 09/271
Derbyshire Constabulary GUIDANCE ON UNSATISFACTORY ATTENDANCE PROCEDURES (UAP) FOR POLICE STAFF POLICY REFERENCE 09/271 This guidance is suitable for Public Disclosure Owner of Doc: Head of Department,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS STUDENTS ASSOCIATION STAFF GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS STUDENTS ASSOCIATION STAFF GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE The Association recognises that, from time to time, members of staff may have problems or concerns regarding their work or relationships
More informationNewcastle University Capability Procedure
Newcastle University Capability Procedure Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Preamble... 1 1.2 General Principles... 3 1.3 Right of Representation... 3 1.4 Trade union representatives... 3 1.5 Scheduling
More informationCapability health procedure for academic support staff
Capability health procedure for academic support staff Policy The School's policy in relation to sickness absence is to support employees by paying sick pay and investigating absence in conjunction with
More informationCapability Policy and Procedure for All School Based Staff. Effective from 1 September 2012 CONTENTS
Capability Policy and Procedure for All School Based Staff Effective from 1 September 2012 CONTENTS 1. Policy Statement 2. Scope of Policy and Procedure 3. Management Support for Performance Advice and
More informationNHS North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group
NHS North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group HR Policies Managing Sickness Absence Approved by: Quality and Assurance Ratification date: November 2016 Review date: November 2019 1 Contents 1 Policy
More informationManaging Work Performance Policy
MWP001 April 2014 Managing Work Performance Policy Policy Number Target Audience Approving Committee MWP001 CCG staff CCG Executive Date Approved 9 th April 2014 Last Review Date April 2014 Next Review
More informationDisciplinary Policy and Procedure
Disciplinary Policy and Procedure Table of Contents Context. p.01 Scope. p.01 Key Principles.. p.01 Responsibilities.. p.03 Informal Support.... p.04 Formal Disciplinary Procedure p.05 Investigation..
More informationRIVERSIDE SCHOOL. Capability Procedure for Support Staff
RIVERSIDE SCHOOL Capability Procedure for Support Staff APPROVED BY GOVERNORS RESPONSIBLE PERSON HEADTEACHER CONTENTS 1. Purpose and Scope 2. Rights of Representation 3. Definitions and Authority to Initiate
More informationRegulation pertaining to disciplinary & related procedures for academic staff
Regulation pertaining to disciplinary & related procedures for academic staff Table of Contents 1. Application... 2 2. Introduction... 2 3. General Principles... 2 4. Investigation... 3 5. Informal guidance
More informationDerbyshire Constabulary POLICE STAFF PROBATIONARY PERIOD GUIDANCE POLICY REFERENCE 06/169. This guidance is suitable for Public Disclosure
Derbyshire Constabulary POLICE STAFF PROBATIONARY PERIOD GUIDANCE POLICY REFERENCE 06/169 This guidance is suitable for Public Disclosure Owner of Doc: Head of Department, Human Resources Date Approved:
More informationSICKNESS ABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY SICKNESS ABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/staff Policy Statement Purpose and Core Principles Leeds Beckett University aims to provide a healthy working
More informationDisciplinary & Grievance Policy Jan 2016
Disciplinary & Grievance Policy Jan 2016 Disciplinary Procedure: Policy statement Greenwich Mencap wants to ensure employees clearly understand the standards of conduct and behaviour (See Code of Conduct
More informationFairness at Work (Grievance Policy & Procedure)
Fairness at Work (Grievance Policy & Procedure) Publication Scheme Y/N Department of Origin Policy Holder Author Related Documents Can be Published on Force Website HR Head of HR Head of Employee Relations
More informationBASINGSTOKE AND NORTH HAMPSHIRE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Regulation of Capability Procedure. [Policy Number HR/381/10]
BASINGSTOKE AND NORTH HAMPSHIRE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST Regulation of Capability Procedure [Policy Number HR/381/10] This supersedes the Trust Performance Management policy Owner Name Nigel Evison Job Title
More informationGrievance Policy and Procedure
Grievance Policy and Procedure Document Control Information Reviewed by the Strategic Management Team: - Date of Next Review: Mar 2016 Approved by the Board of Management: 24 Mar 2014 The Board of Management
More informationMANAGING WORK PERFORMANCE
MANAGING WORK PERFORMANCE HR Policy: HR16 Date Issued: TBC Date to be reviewed: Periodically or if statutory changes are required Policy Title: Supersedes: Description of Amendment(s): This policy will
More informationManaging Capability Policy
Managing Capability Policy 1. Policy Statement The University is committed to a culture of high performance and to supporting employees to do their jobs well and to meet the standards expected of them.
More informationILL HEALTH CAPABILITY (Ordinance Procedure)
UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER ORDINANCE ILL HEALTH CAPABILITY (Ordinance Procedure) For use in: For use by: Owner All Divisions/Schools/Departments/Colleges of the University All University employees Staffing
More informationGrievance and Disputes Policy and Procedure
Policy: G1 Grievance and Disputes Policy and Procedure Version: G1/04 Ratified by: Trust Management Team Date ratified: 8 th August 2012 Title of Author: Alan Wishart Title of responsible Director Director
More informationIndividual and Collective Grievances Policy (Replacing Policy Number 073 and 108 Workforce)
Individual and Collective Grievances Policy (Replacing Policy Number 073 and 108 Workforce) POLICY NUMBER TPWF/216 VERSION 1 RATIFYING COMMITTEE DATE RATIFIED DATE OF EQUALITY & HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACT ANALYSIS
More informationGRIEVANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE
GRIEVANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE Issue Number: 2.0 Issue Date: 23.11.2016 Review Date: 31.08.2016 (to be reviewed in spring 2017) CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Scope 3. Definition 4. Right to be accompanied
More informationProbation Policy and Procedure
Probation Policy and Procedure Effective from 3 rd January 2017 Author: Employee Relations Advisor Human Resources 1.0 Purpose 1.1 The University recognises that a supportive and developmental probation
More informationManaging Sickness Procedure/Policy
1.0 Aim of the procedure 1.1 To ensure that managers: 1 understand and apply the Council s standards of attendance in the work-place and monitor their achievement 2 identify through risk assessments, general
More informationUNIVERSITY OF EXETER DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE. Disciplinary Policy and Procedure
UNIVERSITY OF EXETER DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE Disciplinary Policy and Procedure 1 Policy, purpose and principles 2 Relationship with other Policies and Procedures 3 Informal procedure 4 The Formal Disciplinary
More informationPRINCES RISBOROUGH TOWN COUNCIL DISCIPLINARY POLICY & PROCEDURE
PRINCES RISBOROUGH TOWN COUNCIL DISCIPLINARY POLICY & PROCEDURE PURPOSE AND SCOPE This procedure is designed to help and encourage all employees to achieve and maintain standards of conduct, attendance
More informationDisciplinary Policy & Procedure
Disciplinary Policy & Procedure 1. Purpose and scope 1.1. The purpose of this disciplinary policy is to help and encourage all employees to achieve and maintain required standards of performance and conduct.
More informationStaff Sickness Absence Policy (Incorporating Ill Health Capability Procedures
St Crispin's School Policy Staff Sickness Absence Policy (Incorporating Ill Health Capability Procedures Version Number Date Changes or reason for Update Date Approved Created V1 2005 First Issue 2005
More informationCAPABILITY POLICY. 1. Definitions 1.1 The term Headteacher also refers, where appropriate, to any other title used to identify the Headteacher.
CAPABILITY POLICY PURPOSE This policy applies to all teachers and the Headteacher, and all support staff employed at the school as defined in paragraph 1 below. In the development of this policy consideration
More informationEaling Schools. Medical Capability Procedure
Ealing Schools Medical Capability Procedure April 2009 Summary Medical Capability Procedure The aim of this procedure is to provide fair and effective arrangements to support schools in managing sickness
More informationIntaGR8 Sickness Policy
IntaGR8 Sickness Policy Absence due to illness Section 1 - Policy statement IntaGR8 recognises that certain levels of absence due to illness are inevitable. It is IntaGR8 s policy to deal with cases of
More informationAttendance. Employee Policy HR Consult. 1. Policy Statement
Attendance 1. Policy Statement Employee Policy HR Consult We value the contribution our employees make to our success and high attendance levels are vital to us continuing to achieve high levels of performance.
More informationDiscipline Policy and Procedure. Adopted by the Trust Board on 6 December 2016
Discipline Policy and Procedure Adopted by the Trust Board on 6 December 2016 1 P a g e Whole Trust Discipline Policy and Procedure Contents 1. Purpose... 2 2. General Principles... 2 3. Acceptable Behaviour
More informationHighbury Grove School Disciplinary Procedure
Highbury Grove School Disciplinary Procedure The policy was adopted by the governing body of Highbury Grove School on 8 February 2017 Review date: Spring 2018 1 Contents 1. Purpose... 3 2. Application
More informationINSERT TITLE AND BRANDING Dr A Gill s signature and front cover to be placed on policy when received from Communications. (Policy fully ratified)
Disciplinary Policy INSERT TITLE AND BRANDING Dr A Gill s signature and front cover to be placed on policy when received from Communications. (Policy fully ratified) Consultation Staff Forum August 2014
More informationMinimise any effect, which such absenteeism may have on service standards.
SICKNESS ABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY Tayside Contracts aims to ensure the attendance of all employees throughout the working week. However, it recognises that a certain level of sickness absence may arise
More informationSICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY
SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY Implementation Date: 01 April 2013 Review Date: 01 April 2016 April 2013 V1.0 Page 1 of 12 Contents POLICY OVERVIEW... 3 Purpose... 3 Who this Policy applies to... 3 Key Principles...
More informationUNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS STUDENTS ASSOCIATION STAFF DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE
UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS STUDENTS ASSOCIATION STAFF DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1. Introduction 1.1 In the Association, as in any organisation, issues may arise in relation to staff conduct. In the first instance
More informationNewcastle University Grievance Procedure
Newcastle University Grievance Procedure Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...1 2. SCOPE...2 3. AIM OF THE PROCEDURE...2 4. INFORMAL APPROACH TO DEALING WITH GRIEVANCES...2 5. RIGHT OF REPRESENTATION...3 6. TRADE
More informationGRIEVANCE AND DISPUTES PROCEDURE
GRIEVANCE AND DISPUTES PROCEDURE Ratified by: Joint Local Negotiating Committee Date Ratified: 20 th May 2010 Name of originator/author: Nicky Littler Name of responsible Joint Local Negotiating Committee
More informationCapability Policy. Human Resources Business Partner Version nd July Greenwich Executive Group
Capability Policy Author(s) Human Resources Business Partner Version 0.1 Version Date 2 nd May 2014 Implementation/Approval Date 2 nd July 2014 Review Date July 2017 Review Body Greenwich Executive Group
More informationSchools Disciplinary Policy & Procedure
Schools Disciplinary Policy & Procedure Approved by: Schools Human Resources Trade Unions Schools Human Resources Disciplinary Policy and Procedure September 2011 Page No Introduction... 3 The Purpose...
More informationWHITELEY PRE SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE. 1.1 The disciplinary procedure applies to all members of staff, volunteers and committee members.
WHITELEY PRE SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The disciplinary procedure applies to all members of staff, volunteers and committee members. 1.2 The procedure will be applied in accordance
More informationHuman Resources. Disciplinary procedures Teaching and support staff
Human Resources Disciplinary procedures Teaching and support staff Rev: September 2013 Contents Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Key policy principles 3 3. Support available during the disciplinary procedure
More informationHuman Resources People and Organisational Development. Disciplinary Procedure Manual Staff
Human Resources People and Organisational Development Disciplinary Procedure Manual Staff December 1998 Revised November 2015 Contents 1. Purpose and Scope... 3 2. General Principles... 3 3. Procedure...
More informationSICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY & PROCEDURE
Sickness Absence Management Policy Version 2.0 Last Amended: March 2017 SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY & PROCEDURE Contents 1. Sickness Absence Management Policy..2 2. Equal Opportunities. 2 3. Scope 2 3.1 Exclusions.
More informationPerformance Improvement Policy A guide to addressing poor performance
August 2017 Performance Improvement Policy A guide to addressing poor performance Purpose and Principles Our success as a University is built on the contribution of each one of our staff, so we know how
More informationDRUMBEAT SCHOOL AND ASD SERVICE. Disciplinary Policy (Adopted Lewisham Model Policy)
DRUMBEAT SCHOOL AND ASD SERVICE Disciplinary Policy (Adopted Lewisham Model Policy) APPROVED BY GOVENORS JUNE 2012 RESPONSIBLE PERSON HEADTEACHER SIGNED BY CHAIR OF GOVERNORS DATE SIGNED BY HEADTEACHER
More informationHuman Resources Policy Framework. Management of Attendance Policy and Procedure
Human Resources Policy Framework Management of Attendance Policy and Procedure Approved by: Cabinet Resources Panel (15.12.2015) revised Cabinet Resources Panel (27.11.2012) original Published: 01.01.2016
More informationGrievance Policy/Procedure
Grievance Policy/Procedure Approved by The Executive Date approved October 2015 Status Approved Policy owner Head of HR Impact assessed Version 4 Date of next review Yes June 2018-1- 1.0 Purpose of Policy
More informationDisciplinary Policy & Procedure
Disciplinary Policy & Procedure Document Type Disciplinary Policy & Procedure Author Owner (Dept) Director of Human Resources Human Resources Date of Review May 2015 Version 3 List of Contents Page No
More informationABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY
ABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER Absence Management Policy VERSION V1.0 APPROVING COMMITTEE & DATE Clinical Executive Committee 17.6.15 REVIEW DUE DATE May 2018 CONTENTS 1. Policy statement 1
More informationDisciplinary Policy and Procedure
Disciplinary Policy and Procedure Version 2.5 Important: This document can only be considered valid when viewed on the Trust website. If this document has been printed or saved to another location, you
More informationWhole School Model Disciplinary Procedure
Whole School Model Disciplinary Procedure 1.1. The Headteacher and Governing Body have a responsibility to assist all members of staff (both teaching and non-teaching) in the school to achieve an acceptable
More informationAllensbank Primary School
Allensbank Primary School Disciplinary Policy This policy will be reviewed annually Head teacher: Chair of Governors: 1.CM.035-Sch Issue 4 May-14 Process Owner: ER Team Authorisation: via Education SAJC
More informationGrievance Policy and Procedure
Policy No: PP02 Version: 7.0 Name of Policy: Grievance Policy and Procedure Effective From: 08/01/2016 Date Ratified 07/12/2015 Ratified Human Resources Committee Review Date 01/12/2017 Sponsor Director
More informationArchway Academy Independent School ARCHWAY ACADEMY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES. 24/10/14- Last Updated 15/12/16 1
ARCHWAY ACADEMY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES 1 1.1 Disciplinary Rules We require high standards of discipline from our employees, together with satisfactory standards of work.
More informationSt Thomas More Catholic Primary School
St Thomas More Catholic Primary School Grievance Policy In the development of this policy consideration has been given to the impact on protected characteristics under the Equality Act and the work life
More informationDisciplinary Policy. If these actions do not provide a resolution, then the Formal Disciplinary Procedure set out in this document should be followed.
Disciplinary Policy 1. Policy Statement The University expects all employees to conduct themselves in an appropriate manner in their day to day work, including in their dealings with colleagues, students
More informationManaging Sickness Absence Procedure
SH HR 55 Summary: Keywords (minimum of 5): (To assist policy search engine) Target Audience: This procedure provides guidance on how sickness absence is managed in Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust.
More informationABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY
ABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY Contents: Introduction Scope Framework Formal Action Appeal Support Disability Appendix A - Checklist for managers Appendix B - Return to work interview ID HR015 Last Review Date
More informationGrievance Policy. Approved by governors. Chair Of Governors
Grievance Policy Policy Document Control Sheet: Trust lead: Ian Hickman Key Staff lead for The Ferns Academy: Adele Young + Debra Murphy Portfolio Governor lead: Steve Dale Status: agreed and adopted Date
More informationEmployee Disciplinary Procedure
Employee Disciplinary Procedure PURPOSE AND SCOPE This procedure is designed to help and encourage all council employees to achieve and maintain high standards of conduct whilst at work or representing
More informationGrievance Policy and Procedure for Academic Support Staff
Grievance Policy and Procedure for Academic Support Staff 1. Policy a) The aim of the School's Grievance Procedure is to provide a fair process for individual employees to obtain a speedy resolution to
More informationTrust Policy Human Resources
Trust Policy Human Resources Title: Managing Absence Author(s): Mandy Black, Senior HR Advisor Policy Lead: Isobel Clements, Acting Director of Human Resources Accepted by: Operational Partnership Forum
More informationABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE
ABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY & PROCEDURE Approving Body Trust/Board Date of First Approval June 2016 Date of Last Amendment June 2016 To be Reviewed June 2017 Responsible Officer HR Page 1 of 13 Contents
More information(Management of) Sickness Absence Policy & Procedures
(Management of) Sickness Absence Policy & Procedures 1. Purpose 1.1 The purpose of this policy is to detail both the support that will be available to employees and the steps that the University of Manchester
More informationMANAGING SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY & PROCEDURE
MANAGING SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY & PROCEDURE 1. Introduction 1.1 This policy and procedure applies to all employees of Loughborough University, regardless of contract type or duration, other than those
More informationSICKNESS MANAGEMENT POLICY CONTENTS ORIGINATOR: JUDE MACDONALD SLT LINK: STUART WILLIAMS MAY 2016
SICKNESS MANAGEMENT POLICY ORIGINATOR: JUDE MACDONALD SLT LINK: STUART WILLIAMS MAY 2016 CONTENTS CONTENTS... 1 1 PURPOSE OF THE POLICY AND PROCEDURE... 2 2 MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES... 2 RETURN TO WORK
More informationSickness Absence Policy Implementation Date: 01 April 2013 Review Date: 01 April 2016
Sickness Absence Policy Implementation Date: 01 April 2013 Review Date: 01 April 2016 1 P age AMENDMENT HISTORY VERSION DATE AMENDMENT HISTORY D1 Sept 13 Addition of branding and formatting changes in
More informationGrievance Procedures for Support Staff
Grievance Procedures for Support Staff 1. Scope The following procedures are available to help staff raise issues and concerns about their work, working environment, or working relationships. The aim is
More informationABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY
ABSENCE MANAGEMENT POLICY DOCUMENT CONTROL Policy Title: Purpose: Supersedes: This policy applies to: Circulation: Absence Management Policy This Managing Attendance Policy sets out the procedure for reporting
More informationPROMOTING ATTENDANCE AT WORK - ADVICE FOR EMPLOYEES
ITEM 10.4 Appendix 2 DRAFT June 2012 WORKFORCE PROMOTING ATTENDANCE AT WORK - ADVICE FOR EMPLOYEES June 2012 1 Contents Page number 1. Key Things to Know 3 2. General Statement 5 3. Responsibilities 5
More informationSickness Absence Management Policy and Procedure
Sickness Absence Management Policy and Procedure (Reference No. HR020 0514) Version: Version 2, January 2015 Version Superseded: Version 1, September 2012 Ratified by: Joint Negotiating Committee Date
More informationATTENDANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY
ATTENDANCE MANAGEMENT POLICY CONTENTS 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES 2. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES 1.1 EMPLOYEE 1.2 MANAGER 1.3 HUMAN RESOURCES 1.4 HEALTH & SAFETY SERVICES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 1.5 TRADE UNION RESPRESENTATIVES
More informationGrievance Policy. Version: 2.3. Status: Final. Title of originator/author: Human Resources Directorate. Name of responsible director:
Grievance Policy Version: 2.3 Status: Title of originator/author: Name of responsible director: Developed/revised by group/committee and Date: Approved by group/committee and Date: Final Human Resources
More informationProbationary Period. Staff Guidelines
Probationary Period Staff Guidelines Contents 1 General Principles 1 2 Scope 1 3 Duration of the Probationary Period 2 4 Roles and Responsibilities 2 4.1 New members of staff 2 4.2 Managers 2 4.3 Human
More informationAbsence Management Policy and Procedures
Absence Management Policy and Procedures Part 1 General Policy 1. Introduction 1.1 ARK Schools is committed to creating a positive working environment. Employees who are absent from work due to sickness
More informationSICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY
SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY UNIQUE REFERENCE NUMBER: RC/XX/045/V2 DOCUMENT STATUS: Approved by Committee 3 August 2016 DATE ISSUED: August 2016 DATE TO BE REVIEWED: August 2019 AMENDMENT HISTORY VERSION DATE
More informationTHE CRYPT SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE (FORMERLY THE CONDUCT PROCEDURE AND GUIDANCE)
THE CRYPT SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE (FORMERLY THE CONDUCT PROCEDURE AND GUIDANCE) DISCIPLINARY AND APPEALS Procedure 1. This procedure does not form part of The Employee s contract of employment, except
More informationSouth Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
South Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Document Version Control Document Type and Title: Authorised Document Folder: New or Replacing: Managing Attendance Policy BLUE HRODE
More informationTrust-wide consultation via Share-point, and consultation via the JCNC Implementation date: May 2012
Grievance and Disputes Policy Responsible Director: Author and Contact Details: Document Type: Target Audience: Document Purpose/ Scope: Date Approved/ Ratified: Approved/Ratified by: Andrew Maloney (Director
More informationAbsence Management Policy
Absence Management Policy Number: THCCGHR02 Version: Executive Summary The overall purpose of the policy is to set out the CCG s approach to the management of absence and attendance within the workplace.
More informationMANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT OF PROBATIONARY CONSTABLES (Police Officer) Standard Operating Procedure
MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT OF PROBATIONARY CONSTABLES (Police Officer) Standard Operating Procedure Notice: This document has been made available through the Police Service of Scotland Freedom of Information
More informationHUMAN RESOURCES POLICY DISCIPLINARY
North of England Clinical Commissioning Groups HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY DISCIPLINARY Policy Number: HR07 Version Number: 2.0 Issued Date: May 2015 Review Date: May 2017 Sponsoring Director: Prepared By:
More informationTIME OFF TO TRAIN POLICY
TIME OFF TO TRAIN POLICY CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Policy A. Eligibility B. How to Apply C. Considering an Application D. Meeting E. Decision on Application F. Appeals Procedure G. Extension of Time
More informationPolicy Number G9 Effective Date: 25/05/2017 Version: 1 Review Date: 25/05/2018
Aim of the Policy This document outlines the policy of Carefound Home Care (the Company ) in relation to the disciplinary procedure. This policy is intended to set out the values, principles and policies
More informationILL HEALTH CAPABILITY (Ordinance Policy)
UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER ORDINANCE ILL HEALTH CAPABILITY (Ordinance Policy) For use in: For use by: Owner All Divisions/Schools/Departments/Colleges of the University All University employees Staffing Policy
More informationSOLIHULL METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
SOLIHULL METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE (1) This policy sets out the terms of agreement reached by those participating in the Council s Consultation and Negotiating Framework. and (2)
More informationSchool Disciplinary Procedure
School Disciplinary Procedure Policy or procedure reference number: S1 Issue number: 5 Date: 11/16 Review date: 11/17 Responsibility for review: Headteacher 1. Scope and purpose of the disciplinary procedures
More informationReview date: July 2018 Responsible Manager: Head of Human Resources. Accessible to Students: No. Newcastle College: Group Services:
Redundancy and Redeployment Policy Date approved: 15 July 2015 Approved by: Executive Board Review date: July 2018 Responsible Manager: Head of Human Resources Executive Lead: Group Director (HR and OD)
More informationDignity at Work Procedure
Dignity at Work Procedure Human Resources 1 Purpose This procedure sets out a clear and transparent process to deal with complaints of harassment or bullying within the workplace. The University has developed
More informationSICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE
SICKNESS ABSENCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE Document Title: Sickness Absence Policy and Procedure Version control: V6.0/2017 Policy Owner: Dawn Haddrick, HR Advisor Approval Process: HR: 17 May 2017 Trade union
More informationyour hospitals, your health, our priority ATTENDANCE MANAGEMENT TW10/055 HR COMMITTEE DEPUTY DIRECTOR HR STAFF SIDE CHAIR HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTORATE
Policy Name: ATTENDANCE MANAGEMENT Policy Reference: TW10/055 Version number : 10 Date this version approved: FEBRUARY 2011 Approving committee: HR COMMITTEE Author(s) (job title) DEPUTY DIRECTOR HR STAFF
More informationGrievance and Disputes Policy. Target Audience. Who Should Read This Policy. All Trust Staff
Grievance and Disputes Policy Who Should Read This Policy Target Audience All Trust Staff Version 3.0 September 2015 Ref. Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 4 2.0 Purpose 4 3.0 Objectives 4 4.0 Process 4 4.1
More informationSTAFF DISCIPLINE CONDUCT AND GRIEVANCE POLICY
Hampton Wick Infant & Nursery School STAFF DISCIPLINE CONDUCT AND GRIEVANCE POLICY This policy was adopted/updated: Dec 2009 This policy was reviewed: Jan 2014 This policy will be reviewed: Sep 2016 (or
More informationRECRUITMENT AND APPOINTMENTS POLICY
RECRUITMENT AND APPOINTMENTS POLICY POLICY STATEMENT 1. PHSO aims to have a diverse workforce that reflects the community we serve and the working populations around our offices in order to help us achieve
More informationPolicy and Procedure for the Management of Sickness Absence
Policy Document Policy and Procedure for the Management of Sickness Absence 1. Terms of Reference 1.1 For all employees employed by the Board of Governors of The King s (The Cathedral) School. 1.2 Definitions:
More informationALL WALES GRIEVANCE POLICY
ALL WALES GRIEVANCE POLICY Policy Number: 142 Supersedes: Previous version Standards For Healthcare Services No/s 7 Version No: 1 Date Of Review: 2 March 2016 Reviewer Name: All Wales document Completed
More information